ISSI Meeting - Bern, Switzerland, March Laboratory for Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamiics

Similar documents
Direct effects of particle precipitation and ion chemistry in the middle atmosphere

An Overview of the Impact. on the Stratosphere and Mesosphere

Energetic particle effects on the atmosphere and climate

Chemistry-Climate Models: What we have and what we need

EPP contribution to (stratospheric and) tropospheric variations. Annika Seppälä Finnish Meteorological Institute Academy of Finland

Ionization Rates for from Solar Proton Events

Mesospheric dynamical changes induced by the solar proton events in October November 2003

An Overview of the Impact of Energetic Particle Precipitation (EPP) on the Mesosphere and Stratosphere

Production of Odd Hydrogen in the Mesosphere During the January 2005 Solar Proton Event

Atmospheric Coupling via Energetic Particle Precipitation (EPP)

Energetic Particle Influences on the Ozonosphere mediated by the Geomagnetic Field

IMPULSIVE NITRATE DEPOSITION EVENTS IN POLAR ICE THE RESULT OF SOLAR PROTON EVENTS. D. F. Smart and M. A. Shea SYNOPSIS

Three-dimensional GCM modeling of nitric oxide in the lower thermosphere

Myagkova I.N., Panasyuk M.I., Kalegaev V.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow

Influence of Sudden Stratosphere Warmings on the Ionosphere and Thermosphere

WACCM Studies at CU-Boulder

The Impact of Polar Stratospheric Ozone Loss on Southern Hemisphere Stratospheric Circulation and Surface Climate

Total ozone decrease in the Arctic after REP events

Model simulations of stratospheric ozone loss caused by enhanced mesospheric NO x during Arctic Winter 2003/2004

Atmospheric Responses to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure

Tidal Coupling in the Earth s Atmosphere. Maura Hagan NCAR High Altitude Observatory

The atmospheric response to solar irradiance variations: Simulations with HAMMONIA

2. Sketch a plot of R vs. z. Comment on the shape. Explain physically why R(z) has a maximum in the atmospheric column.

Lecture #1 Tidal Models. Charles McLandress (Banff Summer School 7-13 May 2005)

Geomagnetic cutoff simulations for low-energy cosmic rays

Thermospheric Winds. Astrid Maute. High Altitude Observatory (HAO) National Center for Atmospheric Science (NCAR) Boulder CO, USA

The Effect of Galactic Cosmic Rays on the Middle Atmosphere: a study using the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model

Introduction to Climate ~ Part I ~

Satellite measurements of nitric monoxide (NO) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Dec 2006

TIME SERIES COMPARISONS OF MIPAS LEVEL 2 NEAR REAL TIME PRODUCTS WITH CLIMATOLOGY

The Earth s thermosphere and coupling to the Sun:

Analysis and hindcast experiments of the 2009 sudden stratosphere warming in WACCMX+DART

On recent interannual variability of the Arctic winter mesosphere: Implications for tracer descent

CESM2 (WACCM6): Stratospheric Evaluation

Joule heating and nitric oxide in the thermosphere, 2

Coupled Chemistry in the Met Office UM: current and in a future extended (thermosphere) version

IONIZATION EFFECTS IN THE MIDDLE STRATOSPHERE DUE TO COSMIC RAYS DURING STRONG GLE EVENTS

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Momentum Budget Analysis of the Migra5ng Diurnal Tide in WACCM4: Seasonal Varia5on

D-region electron density and effective recombination coefficients during twilight experimental data and modelling during solar proton events

Lunar Tidal Effects on the Bottom Side of the Ionospheric Plasma With Variation of Local Magnetic Field in Mid-Latitude

Which Earth latitude receives the greatest intensity of insolation when Earth is at the position shown in the diagram? A) 0 B) 23 N C) 55 N D) 90 N

Latitudinal extent of the January 2005 solar proton event in the Northern Hemisphere from satellite observations of hydroxyl

SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences

Effects of Dynamical Variability in the Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere on Energetics and Constituents

Meridional structure of the downwelling branch of the BDC Susann Tegtmeier

Global Atomic Oxygen Abundance in the Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere as Measured by SCIAMACHY

Atmospheric effects of energetic particle precipitation in the Arctic winter revisited

Understanding the Relation between V PSC and Arctic Ozone Loss

The atmospheric impact of the Carrington event solar protons

Climate/chemistry effects of the Pinatubo volcanic eruption simulated by the UIUC stratosphere/troposphere GCM with interactive

Computation of ionization effect due to cosmic rays in polar middle atmosphere during GLE 70 on 13 December 2006

Outline. Planetary Atmospheres. General Comments about the Atmospheres of Terrestrial Planets. General Comments, continued

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 16 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens

On Forecasting Thermospheric and Ionospheric Disturbances in Space Weather Events

Responses of mesosphere and lower thermosphere temperatures to gravity wave forcing during stratospheric sudden warming

Overview of Middle Atmosphere Tides. R. S. Lieberman Northwest Research Associates, Inc. Colorado Research Associates Division Boulder, CO

Updated model CRAC:HEPII of atmospheric ionization due to high energy protons

Overview of the ISS radiation environment observed during EXPOSE- R2 mission in

Global Observations of Earth s Ionosphere/Thermosphere. John Sigwarth NASA/GSFC Geoff Crowley SWRI

Radiative-Convective Models. The Hydrological Cycle Hadley Circulation. Manabe and Strickler (1964) Course Notes chapter 5.1

PHYSICS OF THE SPACE ENVIRONMENT

BIRA-IASB, 30th October 2006

HEIGHT-LATITUDE STRUCTURE OF PLANETARY WAVES IN THE STRATOSPHERE AND TROPOSPHERE. V. Guryanov, A. Fahrutdinova, S. Yurtaeva

1. The vertical structure of the atmosphere. Temperature profile.

Planetary Atmospheres: Earth and the Other Terrestrial Worlds Pearson Education, Inc.

Enhancement of High Energy Electron Fluxes and Variation of Atmospheric Electric Field in the Antarctic Region

Lecture 15 Antarctic Ozone Hole ATOC/CHEM 5151

SC-WACCM! and! Problems with Specifying the Ozone Hole

Dynamical effects of the thermal tides in the Venus atmosphere

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 109, D01110, doi: /2003jd003796, 2004

Modeling polar ozone loss at the University of Colorado

Deep Space Test Bed. POC Deep Space Test Bed (DSTB)

Venus Upper Atmosphere Circulation Models and Coupling from Above and Below

Long term data for Heliospheric science Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA

Radiative Heat Balances in Jupiter s Stratosphere: Development of a Radiation Code for the Implementation to a GCM

Polar vortex dynamics observed by means of stratospheric and mesospheric CO ground-based measurements carried out at Thule (76.5 N, 68.

Modelling the effects of the October 1989 solar proton event on mesospheric odd nitrogen using a detailed ion and neutral chemistry model

Tracking Hurricane Sandy

1-4-1A. Sun Structure

What can I do with the TIEGCM?

Shape and Chemical Diagnostics of the Polar Vortices in WACCM

Modeling of Jupiter s stratosphere: new radiation code and impacts on the dynamics

Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with Thermosphere and Ionosphere Extension (WACCM-X): Model Overview

Chapter 10 Planetary Atmospheres: Earth and the Other Terrestrial Worlds Pearson Education, Inc.

On the sources of day-to-day variability in the occurrence of equatorial plasma bubbles: An analysis using the TIEGCM

DO SOLAR FLARES AFFECT TOTAL OZONE? DEGO MARIN. I.N.T.A., Atmospheric Sounding Station "ElArenosillo", Mazagon, Spain' JAN LASTOVICKA

This project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie-Sklodowska-Curie grant

Large increase of NO 2 in the north polar mesosphere in January February 2004: Evidence of a dynamical origin from GOMOS/ ENVISAT and SABER/TIMED data

CHEM/ENVS 380 S14, Midterm Exam ANSWERS 1 Apr 2014

Pfs results at Mars. By V.Formisano and the PFS Team

Three-dimensional modeling of minor chemical constituents in the mesosphere/lower thermosphere region

PROBLEMS Sources of CO Sources of tropospheric ozone

General Comments about the Atmospheres of Terrestrial Planets

What is a Sudden Stratospheric Warming?

Study of Solar Proton Event Observed using Riometers

Radiation in the atmosphere

Dynamical. regions during sudden stratospheric warming event (Case study of 2009 and 2013 event)

Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling as Revealed in Ground and Space-Based Observations of Total Electron Content

Transcription:

ISSI Meeting - Bern, Switzerland, 23-28 March 214 3D simulations of atmospheric response caused by precipitating electrons and solar protons at both polar regions induced by geomagnetic storms Alexei Krivolutsky alexei.krivolutsky@rambler.ru Laboratory for Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamiics Central Aerological Observatory (CAO), Dolgoprudny, Russia

Outline 1. Particles-Ionization-Chemistry mechanism. 2. Ionization rates caused by the particles (October-November, 23; HEPPA). 3. Models description 4. Particle effects in composition 5. Particle effects in temperature and dynamics 6. Conclusions

Daily averaged energy values of solar protons during 1994-23 (1-1 MeV, GOES data) Averaged energy of protons (MeV) 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 July 14 Nov. 4 Oct. 28 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23

N and OH production caused by cosmic rays (Jackman et al., 1976; Heaps, 1978; Solomon and Crutzen, 1981) 7 km 5 N OH 3 1. 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2. molecular / ion pair

Ionization rates 75 N (66 km) caused by energetic particles during October-November 23 (calculated by Maik Wissing) 1E+11 1E+1 [ p ] [ e ] [ alfa ] Ionization raites 1E+9 1E+8 1E+7 75 N 66 km 1E+6 1E+5 1 2 3 5 7 9 Hours after 26 October 23 (: UT)

Ionizatin raites Ionization rates caused at 75 S (66 km) by energetic particles during October-November 23 (calculated by Maik Wissing) 1E+11 1E+1 1E+9 1E+8 1E+7 [ p ] [ e ] [ alfa ] 75 S 66 km 1E+6 1E+5 2 1 Hours after 26 October 23 (: UT)

Calculated Ionization rates caused by solar protons at 66 km (6 AM 28 October 23) 6H 28oct p 35 longitude 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 latitude 1.5E+1 9.E+9 7.E+9 5.E+9 3.E+9 1.E+9.E+

longitude Calculated Ionization rates caused by solar protons at 66 km (6 PM 28 October 23) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 18H 28oct p - - - -2 2 latitude 1.4E+9 1.2E+9 1.E+9 8.E+8 6.E+8 4.E+8 2.E+8.E+

Calculated Ionization rates caused by relativistic electrons at 66 km (6 AM 28 October 23) 35 6H 28oct E longitude 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 latitude 1.4E+1 1.2E+1 1.E+1 8.E+9 6.E+9 4.E+9 2.E+9.E+

Calculated Ionization rates caused by electrons at 66 km (6 PM 28 October 23) 35 18H 28oct E longitude 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 latitude 1.7E+1 1.5E+1 1.3E+1 1.1E+1 9.E+9 7.E+9 5.E+9 3.E+9 1.E+9.E+

Ionization rates induced by solar protons at 75 N km 7 5 3 2 1 1 2 3 5 7 hours after 27 October 23 1.8E+1 1.6E+1 1.4E+1 1.2E+1 1.E+1 8.E+9 6.E+9 4.E+9 2.E+9.E+

Ionization rates caused relativistic electrons at 75 N km 7 5 3 2 1 4.E+9 3.6E+9 3.2E+9 2.8E+9 2.4E+9 2.E+9 1.6E+9 1.2E+9 8.E+8 4.E+8.E+ 1 2 3 5 7 hours after 27 October 23

Ionization rates caused by relativistic electrons at 85 S IO_e_85S km 7 5 3 2 1 1 2 3 5 7 hours after 27 October 23 9.E+9 8.E+9 7.E+9 6.E+9 5.E+9 4.E+9 3.E+9 2.E+9 1.E+9.E+

CHARM CHemical Atmospheric Research Model equations (-9 km): Model µ µ µ µ + U + V + W = P L AD µ t a cosθ λ a θ z P, L photochemical Sources and Losses U, V, W wind components (from ARM) Number of gas-phase reactions 73; number of photolysis reactions - 38 Chemical families method - Turco, Whitten, 1974 Advection scheme: Prather, 1986

Ozone mixing ratio (ppmv) for 1st January (3D simulation with CAO model) 7 5 3 2 1 - - - -2 2 1 8 6 4 2

NO mixing ratio (ppbv) for 1st January (3D simulations with CAO model) 7 5 3 2 1 - - - -2 2 2 15 1 7 5 2 1

HNO3 mixing ratio (ppbv) for 1st January (3D simulations with CAO model) 7 5 3 2 1 - - - -2 2 1. 8. 6. 4. 2..

N2O mixing ratio (ppbv) for 1st January (3D photochemical simulations) 7 5 3 2 1 - - - -2 2 3 2 22 1 1 1 2 5

ClNO3 mixing ratio (ppbv) for 1st January (3D photochemical simulations) 7 5 3 2 1 - - - -2 2 2.4 2.2 2. 1.5 1..5.1.

ARM -Atmospheric Research Model (GCM) Altitudes: -135 км Resolutions: vertical 1 km; longitudinal 1 ; latitudinal 5 time step 5 min. Paramaterizations: Heating - О2, О3, Н2О (Strobel, 1978; Chou et al., 22); IR cooling- СО2, О3, H2O, NО ( Chou et al., 22; Fomichev, 23; Kockarts, 19), GWs (Lindzen, 1981) Planetary waves at lower boundary

Temperature of the atmosphere for July (ARM model runs)

Zonal wind (m/s) for January (ARM model runs) Height 12 1 2 5 3 2 1 5-5 -1-2 -3 - -5 - -7 - - - - -2 2 Latitude

Tidal component (D) in zonal wind for 18 July 12 11 1 9 7 5 3 2 - -7 - -5 - -3-2 -1 1 2 3 5 7 32 3 28 26 24 22 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2

Tidal component (SD) in zonal wind for 18 July 12 11 1 9 7 5 3 2 - -7 - -5 - -3-2 -1 1 2 3 5 7 42 38 36 34 32 3 28 26 24 22 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2

Longitude 3D Simulation of ozone response (%) at 66 km induced by joint effect of energetic particles (54 hours after - UT 26 October 23) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 Latitude -1-1 -2-3 - -5 - -65

3D Simulation of ozone response (%) at 66 km induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons (66 hours after - UT 26 October 23) Longitude 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 latitude -1-1 -2-3 - -5 - -7 - -9

3D Simulation of NOy response (ppbv) at 66 km induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons (54 hours after - UT 26 October 23) km 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 latitude 12 1 2

Longitude 3D Simulation of NOy response (ppbv) at 66 km induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons (66 hours after - UT 26 October 23) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 latitude 2 1 1 1 12 1 2 1 1

3D Simulation of ozone response induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons (28 October 23 12- UT) Height 2 - - - -2 2 Latitude 15 1 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 - -45-5 -55 - -65-7 -75

3D Simulation of ozone response induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons (2 November 23 12- UT) 1-5 Heigh(km) 2-1 -15-2 -25-3 -35 - -45 - - - -2 2 Latitude -5

3D Simulation of ozone response induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons (4 November 23 12- UT) Height(km) 2 - - - -2 2 Latitude 2 15 1 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 - -45-5

3D Simulation of ozone response (%) at 75 N induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons after 26 October 23 Height(km) 7 5 3 2-1 -5-1 -15-2 -25-3 -35 - -45 1 1 2 3 5 7 9 1 11 12 Hours -5-55

3D Simulation of ozone response (%) at 75 S induced by joint effect of solar protons and precipitating electrons after 26 October 23 Height(km) 7 5 3 2 1 1 2 3 5 7 9 1 11 12 Hours 2 15 1 5-1 -5-1 -15-2 -25-3 -35 - -45-5 -55 - -65-7 -75 -

Ozone response (%) at 75 N induced by solar protons after 27 October 23 (3D simulation) Height(km) 7 5 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 Hours -5-1 -2-3 - -45

Ozone response (%) at 75 S induced by solar protons after 27 October 23 (3D simulation) Height(km) 7 5 3 2 1 2 1121112-5 -1-2 -3 - -5 - -7 - -9 Hours

Ozone response (%) at 75 N induced by electrons after 27 October 23 (3D simulation) Height(km) 7 5 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 22 Hours -5-1 -2-3 -

Ozone response (%) at 75 S induced by electrons after 27 October 23 (3D simulation) Height(km) 7 5 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 22 Hours -5-1 -2-3 - -5 - -7

Ozone response (%) at 75 N induced by alfa-particles after 27 October 23 (3D simulation) Height(km) 7 5 3 2 1 2 1 12 1 1 1 2 22-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-32 Hours

Ozone response (%) at 75 S induced by alfa particles after 27 October 23 (3D simulation) Height(km) 7 5 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 22-5 -1-2 -3 - -5 - -7-75 Hours

OH response at 66 km induced by joint effect of energetic particles for 11- UT 28 October 23 (3D model simulations) 35 Longitude 3 25 2 15 1 5 - - - -2 2 Latitude 1.E+7 8.E+6 6.E+6 4.E+6 2.E+6.E+

NOy response (%) induced by energetic particles in 23-24 at 75 N

NOy response (%) induced by energetic particles in 23-24 at 75 S

Simulated O3 response (%) induced by energetic particles in 23-24 at 75 N

O3 response (%) induced by energetic particles in 23-24 at 75 S

Temperature changes induced by SPE 28.1.23 (ARM model runs) 12 1 1 1 Height(km) 2 - - - - -1-1 -1 - - - -2 2 Latitude

Changes in zonal wind (m/s) induced by SPE of 28.1.28 (ARM model runs) Height (km) 12 1 2.6.5.4.3.2.1 -.1 -.2 -.3 -.4 -.5 -.6 -.7 -.8 -.9-1. -1.1-1.2-1.3 - - - -2 2 Latitude

Changes in zonal wind magnitudes (absolute values) induced by SPE for 4 November 12- UT 23 (simulations with ARM) Height(km) 12 1 2 2.2 2. 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1..8.6.4.2 -.2 -.4 -.6 -.8-1. -1.2-1.4-1.6 - - - -2 2 Latitude

Changes in temperature caused by SPE 28.1.23 at 72 km (GCM model runs) Latitude 2-2 - - - 5 1 15 2 25 3 Hours after 26.1.23 [12:].5.4.3.2.1. -.1 -.2 -.3 -.4 -.5 -.6 -.7 -.8 -.9-1. -1.1-1.2

Changes in UV heating (K/day) at 72 km caused by SPE on 1st of November 12- UT 23 (GCM simulations) Latitude 2-2 - - - 5 1 15 2 25 3 Hours after 26.1.23 [12:].4.3.2.1. -.1 -.2 -.3 -.4 -.5 -.6 -.7 -.8 -.9-1. -1.1-1.2-1.3-1.4-1.5

Changes in zonal wind induced by SPE 28.1.23 at 72 km (GCM model runs) Latitude 2-2 - - - 5 1 15 2 25 3 Hours after 26.1.23 [12:] 2. 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1..8.6.4.2. -.2 -.4 -.6 -.8-1. -1.2

GWs input to SPE-induced temperature changes (K/day) on 1.11.23 (GCM model runs) Height [km] 12 1 2 - - - -2 2 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1..9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1. -.1 -.2 -.3 -.4 -.5 Latitude

Changes in zonal wind (m/s/day) induced by GWs on 1.11.23 as simulated by GCM Height [km] 12 1 2 - - - -2 2 3 3 2 2 1 1-1 -1-2 -2-3 -3-4 -4-5 -5-6 -6 Latitude

Changes in absolute values of zonal wind (m/s) initiated by particle-caused ozone depletion at 75 N (simulations with GCM)

Changes in absolute values of zonal wind (m/s) initiated by particle-caused ozone depletion at 75 S (simulations with GCM)

Changes in absolute values of zonal wind (m/s) initiated by particle-caused ozone depletion at 75 N (simulations with GCM)

Changes in temperature (K) initiated by particle-caused ozone depletion at 75 N (simulations with GCM)

Changes in temperature (K) initiated by particle-caused ozone depletion at 75 N (simulations with GCM)

Changes in temperature (K) on global scale initiated by particle-caused ozone depletion at 37 km (simulations with GCM)

Conclusions 1) Energetic particles change chemical composition and transform wind and temperature fields via ozone depletion. 2) Such effects may induce long-term consequences due to downward transport during polar night. 3) The interaction between chemistry and dynamics leads to temperature effects in the troposphere.

Thank you for your attention!