Classification theorem for the static and asymptotically flat Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton spacetimes possessing a photon sphere

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 1 Nov 2017

Umbilic cylinders in General Relativity or the very weird path of trapped photons

Geometric inequalities for black holes

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 23 Mar 2015

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

Level sets of the lapse function in static GR

Einstein Toolkit Workshop. Joshua Faber Apr

Stationarity of non-radiating spacetimes

Rigidity of Black Holes

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

Theory. V H Satheeshkumar. XXVII Texas Symposium, Dallas, TX December 8 13, 2013

An Overview of Mathematical General Relativity

Black Holes and Thermodynamics I: Classical Black Holes

BLACK HOLES (ADVANCED GENERAL RELATIV- ITY)

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Null Cones to Infinity, Curvature Flux, and Bondi Mass

Stability and Instability of Black Holes

EXCISION TECHNIQUE IN CONSTRAINED FORMULATIONS OF EINSTEIN EQUATIONS

On the Hawking Wormhole Horizon Entropy

Formation and Evaporation of Regular Black Holes in New 2d Gravity BIRS, 2016

Curved spacetime and general covariance

Quasi-local mass and isometric embedding

Singularity formation in black hole interiors

Lecture XIX: Particle motion exterior to a spherical star

3 The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric

Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 2. General Relativity

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013

Kerr black hole and rotating wormhole

Are spacetime horizons higher dimensional sources of energy fields? (The black hole case).

PAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Causality, hyperbolicity, and shock formation in Lovelock theories

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

The Klein-Gordon Equation Meets the Cauchy Horizon

Introduction to Numerical Relativity I. Erik Schnetter, Pohang, July 2007

Curved Spacetime III Einstein's field equations

Gravitational Lensing

From An Apple To Black Holes Gravity in General Relativity

Gravitation: Tensor Calculus

Thermodynamics of rotating charged dilaton black holes in an external magnetic field

Quasi-local Mass and Momentum in General Relativity

Localizing solutions of the Einstein equations

The Time Arrow of Spacetime Geometry

A Summary of the Black Hole Perturbation Theory. Steven Hochman

Kerr-Schild Method and Geodesic Structure in Codimension-2 BBH

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

Pinhole Cam Visualisations of Accretion Disks around Kerr BH

Gravitational waves, solitons, and causality in modified gravity

Electromagnetic Energy for a Charged Kerr Black Hole. in a Uniform Magnetic Field. Abstract

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 29 Jan 2003

Rigidity of outermost MOTS: the initial data version

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 18 Jan 2019

Uniformity of the Universe

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 19 Jun 2009

Quasi-local Mass in General Relativity

Effect of Global Expansion on Bending of Null Geodesics

Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology

Late-time tails of self-gravitating waves

Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions

Mathematical Relativity, Spring 2017/18 Instituto Superior Técnico

Kadath: a spectral solver and its application to black hole spacetimes

Is there a magnification paradox in gravitational lensing?

Lecture: General Theory of Relativity

PAPER 311 BLACK HOLES

Conserved Quantities in Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi Cosmology

FRW cosmology: an application of Einstein s equations to universe. 1. The metric of a FRW cosmology is given by (without proof)

The Stability of the Irrotational Euler-Einstein System with a Positive Cosmological Constant

carroll/notes/ has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general

Singularities and Causal Structure in General Relativity

Non-existence of time-periodic dynamics in general relativity

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Anisotropic Interior Solutions in Hořava Gravity and Einstein-Æther Theory

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 19 Feb 2004

HOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes

A873: Cosmology Course Notes. II. General Relativity

Black Holes in Higher-Derivative Gravity. Classical and Quantum Black Holes

PAPER 52 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Towards a 2nd Law for Lovelock Theory

Curved Spacetime I. Dr. Naylor

Astro 596/496 PC Lecture 9 Feb. 8, 2010

The Geometric Scalar Gravity Theory

Trapped ghost wormholes and regular black holes. The stability problem

Chapter 2 General Relativity and Black Holes

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

Schwarschild Metric From Kepler s Law

Ask class: what is the Minkowski spacetime in spherical coordinates? ds 2 = dt 2 +dr 2 +r 2 (dθ 2 +sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (1)

Gravitation: Cosmology

carroll/notes/ has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general

General Relativity and Differential

Mass, quasi-local mass, and the flow of static metrics

The Geometry of Relativity

Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson

Aspects of Black Hole Physics

Analytic Kerr Solution for Puncture Evolution

Holographic relations at finite radius

Electromagnetic spikes

Gravitation: Special Relativity

Relativistic theory of surficial Love numbers

Physics 325: General Relativity Spring Final Review Problem Set

Self trapped gravitational waves (geons) with anti-de Sitter asymptotics

Transcription:

Classification theorem for the static and asymptotically flat Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton spacetimes possessing a photon sphere Boian Lazov and Stoytcho Yazadjiev Varna, 2017

Outline 1 Motivation 2 Preliminaries 3 Auxiliary results 4 Main theorems 5 Conclusion

Outline 1 Motivation 2 Preliminaries 3 Auxiliary results 4 Main theorems 5 Conclusion

What is a photon sphere? Any null geodesic initially tangent to the photon sphere remains tangent to it.

What is a photon sphere? ˆ Region where light can be confined to closed orbits. ˆ Characteristic of non-rotating black holes and compact objects with radii smaller than 3M. ˆ Closely connected to gravitational lensing. Presence of a photon sphere leads to relativistic images. ˆ Astrophysically timelike hypersurface on which the light bending angle is unboundedly large.

Mathematical properties ˆ In static spacetimes the lapse function is constant on the photon sphere. ˆ Photon spheres are totally umbilic hypersurfaces with constant mean and scalar curvatures as well as constant surface gravity. ˆ Resemblance to event horizons, which leads to the question of classification of solutions using photon spheres.

The problem ˆ Richer class of solutions possessing a photon sphere, compared to the one with an event horizon (neutron stars with radii smaller than 3M have a photon sphere, but don t have an event horizon). ˆ Uniqueness theorems have been proven for the static asymptotically flat solutions to the Einstein equations in vacuum, the Einstein-scalar field equations and the Einstein-Maxwell equations possessing a photon sphere. ˆ Naturally the next question is the classification of the static solutions to the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton field equations.

Outline 1 Motivation 2 Preliminaries 3 Auxiliary results 4 Main theorems 5 Conclusion

Equations and staticity We start with the standard Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton equations, R µν = 2 g µ ϕ g ν ϕ + 2e 2αϕ ( F µβ F β ν g µν 4 F βγf βγ), g [β F µν] = 0, g β ( e 2αϕ F βµ) = 0, g β g β ϕ = α 2 e 2αϕ F µν F µν, and define staticity of the Maxwell and dilaton field in the usual way, L ξ F = 0, L ξ ϕ = 0. For static spacetimes we can write the spacetime and the metric in the form L 4 = R M 3, g = N 2 dt 2 + g.

Photon sphere and electric potential Φ The photon sphere P 3 is defined to be the photon surface of constant N. We modify this with additional properties: the one-forms ι ξ F and dϕ are normal to P 3. We will use later the electric field one-form E and the electric potential Φ, defined in the usual way: E = ι ξ F, dφ = E. With this and considering the purely electric case, where ι ξ F = 0, F is given explicitly by F = N 2 ξ dφ.

Asymptotic flatness For asymtotically flat spacetimes the following expansions for the spatial metric and lapse function hold: g = δ + O(r 1 ), N = 1 M r + O(r 2 ). Next, the asymptotic expansions for the dilaton field ϕ and the electric potential Φ are given by the following: where we set ϕ = 0 and Φ = 0. ϕ = ϕ q r + O(r 2 ), Φ = Φ + Q r + O(r 2 ),

Geometric picture P 3 is the outermost photon sphere. M 3 is a time slice. M 3 ext is the spatial part of the spacetime L 4 outside of the photon sphere. We assume that N regularly foliates M 3 ext. Σ is the intersection of P 3 and M 3, and is the inner boundary of M 3 ext. It is a level set of N by definition. All level sets of N are topological spheres as a consequence of our assumption.

Reduced field equations The reduced Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton equations become: g N = N 1 e 2αϕ g i Φ g i Φ, g R ij = 2 g i ϕ g j ϕ + N 1 g g i j N + N 2 e 2αϕ (g g ij k Φ g k Φ 2 g i Φ g j Φ), g i (N 1 e 2αϕ g i Φ) = 0, g i (N g i ϕ) = αn 1 e 2αϕ g i Φ g i Φ.

Mass, scalar charge and electric charge Using the asymptotic expansions of the potentials, the electric charge is given by Q = 1 N 1 e 2αϕ g i ΦdΣ i. 4π Σ The mass and the dilaton charge are given by the following: M = M 0 + Φ 0 Q, q = q 0 + αφ 0 Q. On the photon sphere we have: M 0 = 1 g i NdΣ i, 4π Σ q 0 = 1 N g i ϕdσ i. 4π Σ

Outline 1 Motivation 2 Preliminaries 3 Auxiliary results 4 Main theorems 5 Conclusion

Dependence between the potentials N, ϕ and Φ Using a new metric γ ij = N 2 g ij on M 3 ext, and introducing new functions u, U, Ψ and ˆΦ, such that N 2 = e 2u, U = u + αϕ, Ψ = ϕ αu, ˆΦ = 1 + α2 Φ, we can rewrite the field equations in the following form: γ R ij = 1 1 + α 2 (2D iud j U 2e 2U D i ˆΦDj ˆΦ + 2Di ΨD j Ψ), D i D i U = e 2U D i ˆΦD i ˆΦ, D i D i Ψ = 0, D i (e 2U D i ˆΦ) = 0.

Dependence between the potentials N, ϕ and Φ From those we can obtain a functional dependence between U and ˆΦ, e 2U 1 ˆΦ 2 + 2(M + αq) Q α ˆΦ = 0, where Q α = 1 + α 2 Q. Introducing yet another potential by dζ = e 2U dˆφ, ζ = 0 we get another functional dependence, (q 0 αm 0 )ζ Q α Ψ = 0, which finally reduces the EMD equations to γ R ij = 2 ( M 2 + q 2 ) 1 + α 2 Q 2 1 D i ζd j ζ, D i D i ζ = 0.

CMC and CSC; some useful relations As a photon sphere, P 3 is totally umbilic, i. e. its second fundamental form is pure trace. Codazzi for P 3 L 4 and EMD = P 3 has CMC. Contracted Gauss for P 3 L 4, EMD, Codazzi for Σ M 3 and dependence between N, ϕ and Φ = P 3 has CSC. We also obtain the following equalities to be used later in the proof: N 0 = 1 N 1 4π e 2αϕ0 0 E2 νa Σ 1 4π N 0( g ν ϕ) 2 A Σ + 3 8π H[ν(N)] 0A Σ, 2[ν(N)] 0 = N 0 H.

Outline 1 Motivation 2 Preliminaries 3 Auxiliary results 4 Main theorems 5 Conclusion

Theorem 1 Let (L 4 ext, g, F, ϕ) be a static and asymptotically flat spacetime with given mass M, electric charge Q and dilaton charge q, satisfying the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton equations and possessing a non-extremal photon sphere (i. e. M 2 + q 2 Q 2 0) as an inner boundary of L 4 ext. Assume that the lapse function regularly foliates L 4 ext. Then (L 4 ext, g, F, ϕ) is spherically symmetric.

Outline of the proof case 1 Here M 2 + q 2 > Q 2 and we consider the potential ( ) λ = M 2 +q 2 1 Q 1 2 1+α ζ and the following inequalities: 2 and M 3 ext M 3 ext D i ( Ω 1 D i χ ) γd 3 x D i [ Ω 1 (ΓD i χ χd i Γ) ] γd 3 x 0 M 3 ext D i [ Ω 1 (ΓD i χ χd i Γ) ] γd 3 x, where χ = ( γ ij D i ΓD j Γ ) 1 4, Γ = tanh(λ) and Ω = 1 cosh 2 (λ). We can show that these transform into an equality, ( ) d ln(n) = 1 dλ 2 coth(λ 0). 0

Outline of the proof case 1 This leads to a vanishing Bach tensor, i. e. R(γ) ijk = 0, which means that R(g) ijk = 0. Finally, considering the surfaces of constant N in M 3, (Σ N, σ) (M 3, g) we can write the spacetime metric in the form: g = N 2 dt 2 + ρ 2 dn 2 + σ AB dx A dx B, since N foliates M 3 ext regularly. Calculating R(g) ijk R(g) ijk = 0 explicitly we can conclude that h Σ N AB = 1 2 HΣ N σ AB, A ρ = 0, i. e. the space geometry is spherically symmetric.

Outline of the proof case 2 Here M 2 + q 2 < Q 2 and we consider the potential ( λ = 1 M 2 +q 2 Q 2 ) 1 1+α 2 ζ. We use the same inequalities but with different functions Γ and Ω, Γ = tan(λ), Ω = cos 2 (λ). The two inequalities lead to an equality, ( ) d ln(n) = 1 dλ 2 cot(λ 0). The same arguments as in case 1 hold and the spacetime is again spherically symmetric. 0

Theorem 2 The second theorem gives an explicit classification of the static and asymptotically flat Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton spacetimes possessing a photon sphere. We can introduce a new parameter M α = M + αq and the following formula: M 2 + q 2 Q 2 = 1 1 + α 2 [ M 2 α Q 2 α + (q αm) 2]. We now consider 2 cases.

Theorem 2 case 1 Here M 2 + q 2 > Q 2. The dimensionally reduced field equations are γ R ij = 2D i λd j λ, D i D i λ = 0. These can be solved for spherically symmetric space, The spacetime metric is thus e 2λ = 1 2 M 2 + q 2 Q 2, r γ ij dx i dx j = dr 2 + e 2λ r 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ). ds 2 = N 2 dt 2 + N 2 [ dr 2 + e 2λ r 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ) ] and we can obtain explicit expressions (3 classes depending on Q2 α M 2 α ) for N, ϕ and Φ, since we know λ.

Theorem 2 case 2 Here M 2 + q 2 < Q 2. The dimensionally reduced field equations are γ R ij = 2D i λd j λ, D i D i λ = 0. These can be solved for spherically symmetric space, ( ) Q2 M λ = arctan 2 q 2, r γ ij = dr 2 + (r 2 + Q 2 M 2 q 2 )(dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ). The spacetime metric is thus ds 2 = N 2 dt 2 + N 2 [ dr 2 + (r 2 + Q 2 M 2 q 2 )(dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 ) ] and we can again obtain explicit expressions for N, ϕ and Φ.

Outline 1 Motivation 2 Preliminaries 3 Auxiliary results 4 Main theorems 5 Conclusion

Discussion Assumptions: The lapse function regularly foliates M 3 ext. In general this assumption cannot be easily dropped. Some of what remains is: Higher dimensional EMD gravitation and/or similar results for stationary spacetimes. What else has been done: Static spacetimes with conformal scalar field. Perturbative approach for the static vacuum case.

Thank you for your attention! The support by Sofia University Research Grant 80.10-30 is gratefully acknowledged.