Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny I 66 (2) Electronic Supplement Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 1863-7221, 5.12.2008 A Contribution to the Phylogeny of the Ciidae and its Relationships with Other Cucujoid and Tenebrionoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia) Ge r d a Bu d e r, Ch r i s t i n Gr o s s m a n n, An n a Hu n d s d o e r f e r & Kl a u s-dieter Kl a s s * State Natural History Collections Dresden, Museum of Zoology, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany [gerda.buder@snsd.smwk.sachsen.de], [christin.grossmann@snsd.smwk.sachsen.de], [anna.hundsdoerfer@snsd.smwk.sachsen.de], [klaus.klass@snsd.smwk.sachsen.de] * Corresponding author (all authors contributed equally to this study) Received 12.vi.2008, accepted 10.x.2008. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 05.xii.2008. > Electronic Supplement Figure captions for Electronic Supplement EFigs. E1 E25. Phylogenetic trees resulting from the various analyses. The trees are designated according to the used taxon sample (E-sample; R-sample; C-sample), the used analytical method (MPew and MPdw = maximum parsimony based on fixed alignment, under equal resp. differentiated weighting of characters; ML = maximum likelihood; MB = MrBayes; DO = partial direct optimization, with gap cost either 2x or 4x that of nucleotide changes), and the included gene fragments (18S, COI, COII, the latter also including part of trna-lys). See chapter 2 for details and Tab. 3 for tree statistics. The last specification, in parentheses, indicates the nature of the tree: (1/N) = one out of N most parsimonious trees, (1/1) meaning the single most parsimonious tree is shown; (sct) = strict consensus tree; (50%) = 50% majority rule tree. Bootstrap values and posterior probabilities of branches are indicated if 50%. The scale for branch lengths gives a measure for the amount of evolutionary changes (in % of aligned sequences); it is attached to the figures where such measurement is applicable (all but consensus trees and trees derived from DO analyses).
Buder et al.: Phylogeny of Ciidae II 10 63 62 87 86 EFig. E1: E-sample-MPew[COI,18S](1/24) 63 62 87 86 EFig. E2: E-sample-MPew[COI,18S](sct)
Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 66 (2) III 1 TRO Thymalus marginicolli 50 80 76 77 76 79 EFig. E3: E-sample-MPdw[COI,18S](1/3) EFig. E4: E-sample-MPdw[COI,18S](sct) 50 80 77 76
Buder et al.: Phylogeny of Ciidae IV EFig. E5: E-sample-ML[COI,18S](1/1) MON Rhizophagus sp- 65 66 91 83 62 90 14 85 98 58 61 83 70 62 56 84 82 86 84 71 79 79 EFig. E6: E-sample-MB[COI,18S](50%mr)
Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 66 (2) V 87 73 70 98 85 56 88 75 EFig. E7: E-sample-MB[18S](50%mr) 80 88 58 83 COC Coccinula14-pustulata 85 57 61 77 72 84 71 74 80 56 91 EFig. E8: E-sample-MB[COI](50%mr)
Buder et al.: Phylogeny of Ciidae VI 10 EFig. E9: R-sample-MPew[COI,18S](1/22) 59 58 EFig. E10: R-sample-MPew[COI,18S](sct) 58 EFig. E11: R-sample-MPdw[COI,18S](1/3) EFig. E12: R-sample-MPdw[COI,18S](sct) 67 73 74 50 51 1 67 74 73 51 50
Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 66 (2) VII 68 EFig. E13: R-sample-ML[COI,18S](1/5) EFig. E14: R-sample-ML[COI,18S](sct) 68 EFig. E15: R-sample-MB[COI,18S](50%mr) 63 87 51 98 60 59 68 89 79
Buder et al.: Phylogeny of Ciidae VIII 1 91 61 EFig. E18: C-sample-MPdw[COI,COII,18S](1/1) 10 78 EFig. E16: C-sample-MPew[COI,COII,18S](1/10) 90 82 EFig. E19: C-sample-ML[COI,COII,18S](1/1) EFig. E17: C-sample-MPew[COI,COII,18S](sct) 78
Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 66 (2) IX 85 75 71 82 72 EFig. E20: C-sample-MB[18S](50%mr) 70 57 83 98 77 56 91 EFig. E21: C-sample-MB[COI](50%mr) 89 63 73 87 57 98 91 EFig. E23: C-sample-MB[COI,COII,18S](50%mr) 77 EFig. E22: C-sample-MB[COII](50%mr)
Buder et al.: Phylogeny of Ciidae X EFig. E24: C-sample-DOgap2x[COI,COII,18S](sct) EFig. E25: C-sample-DOgap4x[COI,COII,18S](sct)