Particle Physics Homework Assignment 3

Similar documents
energy loss Ionization + excitation of atomic energy levels Mean energy loss rate de /dx proportional to (electric charge) 2 of incident particle

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

Problem Set # 2 SOLUTIONS

The interaction of radiation with matter

Books: - Martin, B.R. & Shaw, G Particle Physics (Wiley) (recommended) - Perkins, D.H. Introduction to High Energy Physics (CUP) (advanced)

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

2. Determine the excess charge on the outer surface of the outer sphere (a distance c from the center of the system).

APEX CARE INSTITUTE FOR PG - TRB, SLET AND NET IN PHYSICS

Relativistic Kinematics Cont d

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

UGC ACADEMY LEADING INSTITUE FOR CSIR-JRF/NET, GATE & JAM PHYSICAL SCIENCE TEST SERIES # 4. Atomic, Solid State & Nuclear + Particle

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

Selected Topics in Physics a lecture course for 1st year students by W.B. von Schlippe Spring Semester 2007

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 4

Interaction of Particles and Matter

A brief history of neutrino. From neutrinos to cosmic sources, DK&ER

Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

2 Give the compound nucleus resulting from 6-MeV protons bombarding a target of. my notes in the part 3 reading room or on the WEB.

Phys102 Lecture 29, 30, 31 Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Lecture 9 - Applications of 4 vectors, and some examples

Neutrinos, nonzero rest mass particles, and production of high energy photons Particle interactions

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 3 Homework 1 Nuclear Phenomenology

Lecture 14 (11/1/06) Charged-Particle Interactions: Stopping Power, Collisions and Ionization

2007 Section A of examination problems on Nuclei and Particles

February 18, In the parallel RLC circuit shown, R = Ω, L = mh and C = µf. The source has V 0. = 20.0 V and f = Hz.

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

Rb, which had been compressed to a density of 1013

MEASURING THE LIFETIME OF THE MUON

The next three lectures will address interactions of charged particles with matter. In today s lecture, we will talk about energy transfer through

Nuclear Reactions A Z. Radioactivity, Spontaneous Decay: Nuclear Reaction, Induced Process: x + X Y + y + Q Q > 0. Exothermic Endothermic

1 The Cathode Rays experiment is associated. with: Millikan A B. Thomson. Townsend. Plank Compton

- ~200 times heavier than the e GeV µ travels on average. - does not interact strongly. - does emit bremsstrahlung in

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

Chapter NP-4. Nuclear Physics. Particle Behavior/ Gamma Interactions TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 IONIZATION

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles

Part II Particle and Nuclear Physics Examples Sheet 1

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Chapter Four (Interaction of Radiation with Matter)

Chapter 44. Nuclear Structure

Chapter 22 Quantum Mechanics & Atomic Structure 22.1 Photon Theory of Light and The Photoelectric Effect Homework # 170

is the minimum stopping potential for which the current between the plates reduces to zero.

Physics Quarknet/Service Learning

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

The discovery of the antiproton and other antimatter,

MESUREMENT OF MUON LIFETIME USING COSMIC MUON STOPPED IN PLASTIC SCINTILLATOR DETECTOR.

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

Motivation. g-spectroscopy deals with g-ray detection and is one of the most relevant methods to investigate excited states in nuclei.

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 23, Physics 663, lecture 4 1

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

Discovery of antiproton

Electromagnetic and hadronic showers development. G. Gaudio, M. Livan The Art of Calorimetry Lecture II

CHAPTER 7 TEST REVIEW

1 Introduction. 1.1 The Standard Model of particle physics The fundamental particles

Particle Interactions in Detectors

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

Final Exam Sample Problems

2nd-Meeting. Ionization energy loss. Multiple Coulomb scattering (plural and single scattering, too) Tracking chambers

Neutrino Helicity Measurement

We start with a reminder of a few basic concepts in probability. Let x be a discrete random variable with some probability function p(x).

IB Physics SL Y2 Option B (Quantum and Nuclear Physics) Exam Study Guide Practice Problem Solutions

Overview: In this experiment we will study the decay of a radioactive nucleus, Cesium. Figure 1: The Decay Modes of Cesium 137

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

Overview: In this experiment we study the decay of a radioactive nucleus, Cesium 137. Figure 1: The Decay Modes of Cesium 137

EP228 Particle Physics

Today, I will present the first of two lectures on neutron interactions.

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Chapter VIII: Nuclear fission

Interaction of Particles with Matter

CHAPTER 12 TEST REVIEW

SECTION C: NUCLEAR RADIATION AND NUCLEAR ENERGY LOSS PROCESSES. " N & = '!t and so N = N 0. implying ln! N $

Class XII - Physics Atoms Chapter-wise Problems

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS

Barrier Penetration, Radioactivity, and the Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

1 The pion bump in the gamma reay flux

University of Michigan Physics : Advanced Laboratory Notes on RADIOACTIVITY January 2007

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Reactions

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department. Problem Set 5 Solutions

Physics H7C Midterm 2 Solutions

Y2 Neutrino Physics (spring term 2017)

Quantum and Atomic Physics - Multiple Choice

Name Final Exam December 14, 2016

Forms of Ionizing Radiation

Case Study: Analyzing Elementary Particle Trajectories

PHYS 352. Charged Particle Interactions with Matter. Intro: Cross Section. dn s. = F dω

Strand J. Atomic Structure. Unit 2. Radioactivity. Text

Lecture 6-4 momentum transfer and the kinematics of two body scattering

Fundamental Interactions (Forces) of Nature

Chapter 32 Lecture Notes

Transcription:

Particle Physics Homework Assignment Dr. Costas Foudas January 7 Problem : The HERA accelerator collides GeV electrons with 92 GeV protons. I. Compute the centre of mass energy (total available energy at the electron proton centre of mass) assuming that the angle between the proton and the electron beam momenta is 8 (head on collision). II. Compute the boost, CM, of the electron-proton centre of mass frame relative to the laboratory frame. III. What should be the energy of an electron beam colliding with protons at rest if the centre of mass energy were to be the same with HERA? This type of experiment is called fixed target experiment to distinguish it with the previous which is called a collider experiment. Solution: I. Define P e = P e ; P e and P p = P p ; P p to be the beam electron and proton 4- vectors. We already know that the centre-of-mass-energy-square is given by : s = P e P p 2 = m 2 e m 2 P 2 P e P p. A the energies we are dealing here we can neglect the mass terms and since the beams collide head-on the 4-vector product can be simplified. Hence, s = 4 P e P p =,4GeV 2 II. The boost is given by: = P p P e P e P p = 92 x x 92 =.94 x III. For fixed target we have: P e = P e ; P e and P p = m p ;. Hence, s = P e P p 2 = m e 2 m P 2 2 P e m p we neglect again the electron and proton masses and we get: s = 2 P e m p Therefore,,4GeV 2 = 2 P e m p P e =55,2GeV where the proton mass has been approximately set to GeV.

2 Problem 2 : Deduce an expression for the energy of a γ-ray from the decay of the neutral pion, π γγ, in terms of the mass m, energy E, and velocity βc of the pion and the angle of emission ϑ in the pion rest frame. Show that if the pion has spin zero, so that the angular distribution is isotropic, the laboratory energy spectrum for the γ-rays will be flat extending from E(+β)/2 to E(-β)/2. For relativistic pions, find an expression for the disparity D (the ratio of energies) for the γ-rays and show that D> is half the decays and D>7 is one quarter of them.(perkins p, 4 th edition) Solution: Figure : Shown here is the π decaying in the centre of mass frame (left) and the Laboratory frame (right). In the CM system we have k =k ; k and k 2 =k 2 ; k 2. However because it is the CM system k = k 2. The two outgoing particles are photons and have zero mass. Hence, k = k 2 = k = k 2. Using then energy conservation we have that m = k 2 k = 2 k k = m 2 And the two 4-vectors in the CM frame are completely determined from the kinematics: k = m 2, n, k 2 = m 2, n () The photon energy in the laboratory frame is given by: 2

k LAB = E LAB ; p LAB and can be computed using the Lorentz transformation: E LAB = k k (2) 2 E LAB = m cos * () 2 where, refer to the pion boost in the laboratory frame with: E LAB = m (4) 4 E LAB = E LAB 2 cos* (5) The spin of the pion is of course zero and this means that the decay distribution in the pion rest frame will be isotropic. In other words the number of photons produced per solid angle will be constant, C: dn d =C dn = C dn d * d * d * = 2C = Constant 5 dn de = 2 LAB E LAB dn d cos * = Flat The limits of the distribution can also be derived with the help of (5). The photons emitted at the direction of the pion have the maximum energy equal to: 5 E LAB MAX = E LAB 2 while those emitted opposite to the direction of the pion will have the minimum energy: 5 E LAB MAX = E LAB 2

4 Figure 2: The photon distribution in the Laboratory frame. The energy disparity, D, of the two photons is given by: D = E LAB LAB E 2 = cos * cos * cos * cos * (6) Note that the disparity distribution has a range from to infinity be definition since for each event we divide always the most energetic photon by the least energetic one. Double counting is avoided by not allowing the cos * to become negative. In order to compute the population of decays above a certain value of disparity, D ' one needs to know the disparity distribution dn dd and integrate from D to infinity. dn dd = dn dcos * dcos dd * (7) The first term in (6) known to be a constant and the second we need to compute: Let cos * = x (8) 68 dd dx = 2 x 2 (9) 4

5 68 x = D D () and using (7) we get: dn dd = dn dcos * 2 d 2 N DD = dn dd dd = dn dcos * 2 D dd 2 N DD = dn dcos * 2 D Hence: N D = dn dcos * 2 = 2 dn dcos * N D7 = dn dcos * 2 7 = 4 dn dcos * Figure : The Energy disparity distribution in the laboratory frame. 5

6 Problem : A high energy electron collides with an atomic electron which can be considered at rest. What is the threshold (the minimum kinetic energy of the incident electron) for producing and electron positron pair? Solution: We are asked to find out what it the minimum kinetic energy so that the reaction: e - e - e - e - e - e + will be allowed to occur. In other words what is the minimum kinetic energy of the incident electron so that the 4 outgoing particles are produced with zero kinetic energy (the only energy they have is due to rest mass). Let P = E ; p be the 4-vector of the incident electron, P 2 = m e ; that of the atomic electron assumed at rest, and P = P 4 = P 5 = P 6 = m e ; the 4 vectors of the final state particles. Conservation of energy and momentum during the collision dictates that: P P 2 = P P 4 P 5 P 6 P P 2 2 = P P 4 P 5 P 6 2 2 m e 2 2 Em e = 4 m e 2 2 2 ji6 p i p j 2 m e 2 2 Em e = 4 m e 2 2 6 m e 2 = 6 m e 2 E = 7 m e So the kinetic energy of the incident electron must be at least 6 times the mass of the electron for an extra electron positron to be produced. This is precisely the way that the anti-poton was discovered via the reaction: p p p p p p in 955 at Berkley and this is why the accelerator was designed to produce a proton beam up to 6 GeV. At the time the unit GeV was called BeV. Hence the accelerator was called Bevatron. The results of this experiment have been published in: O. Chamberlain, E. Segre, C Wiegand, T. Ypsilantis, Phys. Rev., 947, (955). 6

7 Problem 4: An experiment which measured parity violation in weak interactions as well as the + magnetic moment and the Lande' g factor, used a + beam which was produced from the decay in flight of a + beam ( + + ). The kinetic energy of the + beam was 85 MeV. The + beam was produced by colliding a proton beam from an accelerator with a target and selecting the positively charged + from the negatively charged - using a magnetic field. Positive pions of a certain direction and momentum were selected by passing the + beam through an appropriately positioned concrete block with a straight hole through it. Questions regarding the beam: I. Compute the decay length of the pions in the laboratory frame. The lifetime of the + is 26 ns and the + mass is about 4 MeV. The incident beam to the experiment was a mixture of % + and 9% +. How far was the experiment from the point where the pions were produced? II. Compute the pion mean free path in carbon assuming that the pion carbon cross section at the relevant energy is mb. III. Compute the muon and neutrino energies in the rest frame of the pion. Assume that the neutrino is massless and that the mass of the muon is m =6 MeV. IV. Compute the maximum and minimum energy of the muon in the lab frame. V. The authors of the paper used a carbon block 2 cm long. Justify this given that pions and muons of this energy lose in carbon approximately 4.5 MeV/cm due to ionization. 7

8 Questions Regarding the Apparatus: Figure 4: Part of the apparatus of the Garwin-Lederman-Weinrich experiment Phys. Rev.,5:45-47, 957. The 85 MeV NEVIS pion beam is seen entering from the top. The carbon absorber length has been chosen so that only muons exit the carbon block whilst the pions stop in the block. Hence a signal coincidence from the counters # and #2 indicates that a muon has gone through. If the Carbon length is chosen correctly is also means that it will most likely stop on the carbon target below. The experimental apparatus is shown in Fig.. A carbon block has been used to separate the pions from the muons. The carbon block was introduced to for two reasons: () to stop the pions (2) to slow down the muons in such a way so that when they exit the carbon block they have very little kinetic energy left and thus are captured for study by the carbon target shown tilted at the bottom of Fig. 4. Two counters # and #2 have been placed at the path of the beam before and after the carbon block. Counters are devices made of liquid or plastic scintillator. When a charged particle goes through a counter it excites the scintillator material and produces light which can be collected and converted by photo-tubes to charge. Detection of this charge using electronic circuits provides information which indicates that a particle has gone through the scintillator material as well as allows a measurement of the time that the particle went through. 8

9 The signals from Counters # and #2 in this experiment are used in coincidence to provide an experimental trigger. This means that if both counters detected that a particle went though at the same time (coincidence trigger) then that meant that a muon went through the carbon and exited from the other side albeit with very little kinetic energy so that it most likely stopped on the target. If the trigger coincidence condition was fulfilled then detectors around the target were activated appropriately and recorded the data from the muon decays. VI.Compute the maximum possible angle of the decay muons from pions in the Laboratory frame. Use the results from (V) and explain how does the carbon block constrain this angle? Do the angles of the muons which are capable to penetrate the block extend up to this angle? VII.Given that this experiment does not record data unless if there is a trigger compute and discuss how does the distance between the two counters affects the muon energy spectrum detected in this experiment. Assume that the beam enters at the center of the fist counter. Hence, this part of the apparatus has been designed to collect muons which stop at the target (for sometime since the muon lives only 2.6 µsec) to study their properties. The rest of this experiment as well as the results of it will be discussed later in the course when we discuss parity violation in weak interactions and and about the muon magnetic moment. Solution: I. The kinetic energy of the pions is KE=85 MeV. Hence, E = 854 MeV = 225 MeV = E m = 225 MeV 4 MeV =.6 =.78 ; =.26 l = c =.6.78 8 26 9 m = 9.8 m If the beam contains only % muons this means that 9% of the pions have survived at the entry point which we assume it to be located at distance D from the production point: The time difference introduced by the muon travelling between the two counters is very small and the experiment is not sensitive to it. 9

N I N =e t / ln N I = t.5 = D N c D =. m II. = A N A = 2. gr mole 6.22 2 atoms mole 2.265 gr cm 28 m 2 =88 cm III. This is a two-body decay, + +, therefore in the pion rest frame we have P = P P P P 2 2 = P m 2 2 m E = m 2 and finaly E = m 2 2 m = 42 6 2 MeV = 29.87 MeV MeV 2 m 2 4 Assuming that the neutrino is massless we have that p =E in units of ħ=c= (perhaps now you start appreciating the use of these units). At the pion rest frame (two body decay) we have that: p = p =E () Hence E = E 2 m 2 =. MeV MeV (2) IV. Muons of maximum energy at the laboratory frame are those that travel at the pion direction in the pion frame and those that travel opposite to it will have the minimum energy in the lab frame. This statement makes perfect sens but can also be derived from the Lorentz transformation: E LAB = E p and using E LAB MAX =.6.78 MeV = 25 MeV E LAB MIN =.6.78 MeV = 9 MeV V. Easy: L = 85 cm=9 cm so 2 cm is enough so no pions exit. However the kinetic 4.5 energy of the muons from the pion decay in flight is between

9 6 KE LAB 25 6 MeV MeV KE LAB 9 MeV At 2 cm the muons will lose approximately 9 MeV so not all of them will come out of the block. Muons with kinetic energy above 9 MeV will come out with a kinetic energy between 9 MeV. VI. Let, p be the angle and the 4-momentum of the decay muon in the pion frame and LAB, p LAB be the angle and 4-momentum of the muon in the laboratory frame. The Lorentz transformation from the the pion to the laboratory frame gives: p LAB = p p = p p cos () p LAB = p p = p cos p (4) 2 p LAB = p 2 = p sin (5) (The axis with index is along the the boost direction and the axis with index 2 is perpendicular to it). tan LAB = p 2 LAB p sin sin = p cos p = P LAB cos p p Demand that tan LAB has a maximum as a function of and you get that cos MAX p = p =.78 MAX = in the pion frame tan LAB =.224 LAB 2.6 The muons capable of penetrating the block will have energies above E min =6+9 MeV. Hence, p LAB = p p cos E min cos E min p p = 96.6.26 =.5 6 tan LAB sin6.6 cos6.26 =.6 LAB 9.

2 Hence the muons that can penetrate the block can never be emitted at angles smaller than 9. degrees (these have energies between 96 and 25 MeV or kinetic energies between 9 and 9 MeV. VII. By making the distance between the counters larger (i.e moving # further upstream) we are constraining the muon angle in the laboratory frame as well as the angle at the pion rest frame to lower values and therefore the energy at higher values. For example muons of energy larger than 2 MeV correspond to cos E min p p = 2.6.26 29.5 LAB 4.68 which can be obtained by putting the counters 6cm apart. The bottom line is that by adjusting the carbon block length and the counter distance one can determine the energy of the muons. A phenomenon called multiple coulomb scattering (which will learn later in the course) limits this precision particularly at low angles (perhaps less than % effect). 2

Problem 5: When the muon was originally discovered back in the s, people thought that this was the Yukawa particle. The Yukawa particle was considered then to be the mediator of the strong interaction. This incorrect interpretation of the nature of the muon was due to the fact that the muon mass (6 MeV) was not very different from the expected mass of the particle predicted by Yukawa. Later on it turned out that the Yukawa particle was the pion which was discovered in the 4s at Bristol. This problem 2 relates to the calculations done by Tomonaga and Araki who predicted that if the muon was the mediator of the strong interaction then negative muons passing through matter would be more likely to be captured by the nuclei rather than decay. (a) Show that a negative muon captured in an S-state by a nucleus of charge Ze and mass A will spend a fraction f.25 A Z /7 of its time inside the nuclear matter and that in time t it will travel a total distance fct.25 Z /7 in the nuclear matter. The hydrogen atom ground state wave function can be used in these calculations with modifications to account for the fact that the muon mass is of the order of 2 times larger than the electron mass: = Z /2e Zr where = ħ2 M R e and M R= A m p m is the 2 A m p m reduced mass of the proton muon system. The proton and muon masses are m p = 98 MeV and m = 6 MeV. (b) The law of radioactive decay of free muons is dn /dt = d N, where =/ is the decay constant (width) and the lifetime is =2.6 sec. For a negative muon captured in an atom Z the decay constant is TOT = d c, where c is the width for nuclear capture i.e. the probability per unit time of nuclear capture. For aluminium Z =, A=27 the mean lifetime of negative muons is =.88 sec. Calculate c and using he expression for f in (a), compute the interaction mean free path for a muon in nuclear matter. (c) From the magnitude of estimate the magnitude of the coupling constant of the interaction that caused the nuclear capture - p n given that the strong interaction coupling constant is S and corresponds to a mean free path of fm. Conversi, Pancini and Piccioni did experiments in Rome in the 4s to test Tomonaga's and Araki's hypothesis and found that positive muons traversing different materials always decay rather than being captured (not surprising). They also found that negative muons undergo nuclear capture in iron. However, in carbon negative muons decay and do 2 This is a modified version of problem.9 in p4 in Perkins 4 th edition. Conversi, Pancini and Piccioni, Phys. Rev., 7. No, Feb. 947.

4 not get captured by the nucleus in direct contradiction of the Tomonaga-Araki hypothesis. Hence, the muons have nothing to do with the strong interaction. Solution: The fraction that the muon spends in nuclear matter is equal to the probability of the muon being in the nucleus which can be calculated using quantum mechanics: f r N * = dv r f = N Z 2 Zr e r 2 dr d f 2 Zr N = 4 Z 2 Z e y y 2 dy () However the integral can be calculated as according to: f = y y 2 e y dy = 2 2e y 2 y e y y 2 e y (2) Hence, from () and (2) we have that: f = [ e y y e y 2 y 2 e y ] y= 2 Zr () N The quantity y is a small number since we it is a division of the nuclear radius by the Bohr radius. Hence, by expanding the exponentials and keeping terms up to y we get that: f = 6 2 Zr N (4) For such a muonic atom it is given that = ħ2 M R e 2 (5) and (4) and (5) give: f = 4 Z M R e 6 ħ 6 r N (6) What is left now is to compute the nuclear radius r N. 4

5 The nuclear radius can be estimated from the compton wavelength of the pion 4 MeV r p =.4 fm scaled by A / to account for the fact that the nucleus has many protons and neutrons: 4 r N = 4 ħ m c A r N ħ = m c A (7) So from (6), (7) we get: f = 4 M R A Z m 7 The reduced mass is given by : M R = A m p m A m p m which for large A as in (b) becomes M R m =6 MeV Hence, f = 4 6 4 A Z 7 = 4 Z.4 A 7 =.58 A Z 7 Easier way of solving this problem and comparison with the resul from Perkins: A more rough results can be computed as follows: The Bohr radius for such an atom is =7/ Z m a nd the nuclear radius can be computed as : 97. MeV fm r N = A / =.4 fm A /. 4 MeV Simple volume arguments then give that: f = r N =.4 97. MeV 6 MeV A Z 7 =.4 A Z 7 which is off by (4/) from the exact result. 5

6 It turns out that Perkins has used.2 fm A / for the nuclear radius which then gives: f =.27 A Z 7. However, all these tell us that simple 'back of the envelop' calculations can come very close to the exact quantum mechanical result (if you know what you are doing). Just like in Homework we can compute the velocity of the muons as: m e v 2 = 4 Z e2 2 m e v 2 = 4 Ze2 () e 2 As before structure constant is given by: = 4 ħ c = which for 7 ħ = c = = becomes = e2 4 = 7 (2) However the Bohr radius (compute it and convince yourselves) also acquires a factor of Z in the denominator as seen before: 2 m e v 2 = Z v 2 = Z m e = Z Z m e m e 2 = Z Hence, v = Z and the time that the particle spent in nuclear matter is of course D= fct Z 7 (b) This is somewhat easier: The total width for the muon to disappear is the sum of the width to be eaten (captured) by the nucleus plus the width to die in old age by itself (decay). In other words: TOT = decay capture = TOT decay capture with decay =2.6 sec and TOT =.88 sec 6

7 Hence: capture =.49 sec The mean free path can now be computed from: f =.58 A Z 7 D= fct Z 4 Z =.58 A 7 7 c capture =.58 27 /7 4.49 sec D 57 cm Recall that the mean free path was inversely proportional to the interaction cross section. So the ratio of the cross section of the interaction that causes the capture over the strong interaction cross section is related to the mean free paths of the two interactions as capture strong = fm 57 cm = 57 As you may remember from quantum mechanics the cross section is proportional to the coupling-square because the cross section is computed from the amplitude-square. Hence the ratio of coupling of the two interactions is equal to the square root of the ratio of cross sections. Hence, g capture g strong = 57 = 4 8 Conclusion: Whatever causes this muon capture in the nucleus has nothing to do with the strong interaction because it has a coupling constant which is eight orders of magnitude smaller. So the muon could not have been the Yukawa particle. 7