Pion Form Factor Contribution in Vacuum Polarization corrections for 1s energy level in different Pionic-Hydrogen Atoms

Similar documents
Relativistic corrections of energy terms

Proton charge radius puzzle

13. Basic Nuclear Properties

User s Guide for Neutron Star Matter EOS

Proton. Hadron Charge: +1 Composition: 2 up quarks 1 down quark. Spin: 1/2

for the production of lepton pairs and photons in collisions of relativistic nuclei

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540

Calculations of the Pion-Nucleus Inelastic Cross Sections Using the Microscopic Optical Potential

Central density. Consider nuclear charge density. Frois & Papanicolas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 133 (1987) QMPT 540

1. Nuclear Size. A typical atom radius is a few!10 "10 m (Angstroms). The nuclear radius is a few!10 "15 m (Fermi).

Parity-Violating Asymmetry for 208 Pb

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.atom-ph] 8 Oct 2004

Lisheng Geng. Ground state properties of finite nuclei in the relativistic mean field model

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 4 Nature of the nuclear force. Reminder: Investigate

arxiv:physics/ v3 27 Jun 2005

Chapter 28. Atomic Physics

Shape of Lambda Hypernuclei within the Relativistic Mean-Field Approach

Effect of Barrier Height on Nuclear Fusion

E. Fermi: Notes on Thermodynamics and Statistics (1953))

L. David Roper

A natural solution of the proton charge radius puzzle.

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 5 : Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering. Electron-Proton Scattering

Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov description of sizes and shapes of A = 20 isobars

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 5 Jul 2012

The Nucleus. PHY 3101 D. Acosta

Schrödinger equation for the nuclear potential

Global properties of atomic nuclei

Neutron Halo in Deformed Nuclei

LAMB SHIFT & VACUUM POLARIZATION CORRECTIONS TO THE ENERGY LEVELS OF HYDROGEN ATOM

NEW VALUE OF PROTON CHARGE rms RADIUS

Goal: find Lorentz-violating corrections to the spectrum of hydrogen including nonminimal effects

Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen and the proton charge radius puzzle

Investigation of Nuclear Ground State Properties of Fuel Materials of 232 Th and 238 U Using Skyrme- Extended-Thomas-Fermi Approach Method

Chapter 3: Relativistic Wave Equation

Spin-Orbit Interactions in Nuclei and Hypernuclei

Pseudopotential generation and test by the ld1.x atomic code: an introduction

The Nuclear Equation of State

Introduction to Modern Physics Problems from previous Exams 3

Directions toward the resolution of the proton charge radius puzzle

Higher-order recoil corrections in Helium and Helium-like ions

(relativistic effects kinetic energy & spin-orbit coupling) 3. Hyperfine structure: ) (spin-spin coupling of e & p + magnetic moments) 4.

Physics 3223 Solution to Assignment #5

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

QUANTUM MECHANICS SECOND EDITION G. ARULDHAS

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS by Lawrence R. Mead, Prof. Physics, USM

CHAPTER 6: AN APPLICATION OF PERTURBATION THEORY THE FINE AND HYPERFINE STRUCTURE OF THE HYDROGEN ATOM. (From Cohen-Tannoudji, Chapter XII)

Charge density distributions and charge form factors of some even-a p-shell nuclei

Structure properties of medium and heavy exotic nuclei

QED, Lamb shift, `proton charge radius puzzle' etc.

Precision physics of simple atoms:qed tests, nuclear structure and fundamental constants

Lecture 3. Solving the Non-Relativistic Schroedinger Equation for a spherically symmetric potential

Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions

Relativistic versus Non Relativistic Mean Field Models in Comparison

The Lamb shift in hydrogen and muonic hydrogen and the proton charge radius

Energy Level Energy Level Diagrams for Diagrams for Simple Hydrogen Model

Model operator approach to calculations of the Lamb shifts in relativistic many-electron atoms

Presence of Barrier Distributions in Heavy Ion Fusion

Nuclear size corrections to the energy levels of single-electron and -muon atoms

Preliminary Quantum Questions

Lecture 8 Feynman diagramms. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Instead, the probability to find an electron is given by a 3D standing wave.

Bound Electron g Factor

DI-NEUTRON CORRELATIONS IN LOW-DENSITY NUCLEAR MATTER

Intermediate Energy Pion- 20 Ne Elastic Scattering in the α+ 16 O Model of 20 Ne

New simple form for phenomenological nuclear potential. Abstract

RADIAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION- DEMYSTIFIED

1.6. Quantum mechanical description of the hydrogen atom

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 8 (10/4/06) Neutron-Proton Scattering

Electric Potential. 1/22/14 Physics for Scientists & Engineers 2, Chapter 23 1

Fine structure in hydrogen - relativistic effects

AFDMC Method for Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Astrophysics

Nuclear structure Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University

UNIT 15: NUCLEUS SF027 1

1 Schroenger s Equation for the Hydrogen Atom

Final Exam Practice Solutions

221B Lecture Notes Quantum ElectroDynamics

A Monte Carlo Simulation for Estimating of the Flux in a Novel Neutron Activation System using 252 Cf Source

Electron-positron production in kinematic conditions of PrimEx

1 Introduction. 1.1 The Standard Model of particle physics The fundamental particles

Calculation of realistic electrostatic potentials in star crusts

Solved radial equation: Last time For two simple cases: infinite and finite spherical wells Spherical analogs of 1D wells We introduced auxiliary func

Chem 467 Supplement to Lecture 19 Hydrogen Atom, Atomic Orbitals

One-loop corrections as the origin of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in the massless chiral sigma model

Physics 129, Fall 2010; Prof. D. Budker

D Göttingen, Germany. Abstract

QRPA Calculations of Charge Exchange Reactions and Weak Interaction Rates. N. Paar

Simulated nucleon nucleon and nucleon nucleus reactions in the frame of the cascade exciton model at high and intermediate energies

In this lecture, we will go through the hyperfine structure of atoms. The coupling of nuclear and electronic total angular momentum is explained.

High Density Neutron Star Equation of State from 4U Observations

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

General Physics (PHY 2140)

Nuclear electric dipole moment in the Gaussian expansion method

Joel Broida UCSD Fall 2009 Phys 130B QM II. Homework Set 4

Ro-vibrational spectroscopy of the hydrogen molecular ion and antiprotonic helium

Lecture 2 Finding roots of a function, Λ hypernuclei

An Alternative Approach to Modelling Elementary Particles. S. Reucroft * and E. G. H. Williams ThinkIncubate, Inc., Wellesley, Mass.

arxiv: v2 [physics.atom-ph] 24 Mar 2012

Lec. 8: Hydrogen Atom and Band Theory

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 19 The Stark Effect in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

64-311/5: Atomic and Molecular Spectra

Transcription:

IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-issn: 2278-4861.Volume 9, Issue 1 Ver. III (Jan. Feb. 217), PP 2-26 www.iosrjournals.org Pion Form Factor Contribution in Vacuum Polarization corrections for 1s energy level in different Pionic-Hydrogen Atoms M El Shabshiry 1, S. Ismaeel 2 1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University 11556, Cairo, Egypt 2 College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Kharj, Saudi Arabia Abstract: The 1s energy level vacuum polarization correctionsof pionic hydrogen atom induced by a potential including form factor are compared with those obtained by using pion point potential. Without form factor of nucleus and pion the correction increases very slowly for low Z atoms and increases fastly for higher Z. The finite size of the nucleus increases the correction with Z in case of exponential distribution, while in case of Gaussian distribution the increase is lower. For Fermi distribution there is a fast increase at low values of Z and faslty decreases with higher values of Z. The effect of form factor of pion on the correction is very clear for low Z nuclei and then becomes nearly constant for higher values Z. Keywords: Vacuum polarization correction, pion form factor, pionic-hydrogen atom. I. Introduction Vacuum polarization plays an important role of calculating the energy levels of atoms. It is small in hydrogen atoms but for heavier orbital particles such as muons and pions it gives a dominant contribution to QED corrections. It is the interaction of the bound electron with the electrons in the Dirac Sea. Fig.1 Represents Feynman diagram for one loop vacuum polarization. We calculated the vacuum polarization corrections in different energy levels for mionic-hydrogen atom [1] and for pionic-hydrogen atom with finite size proton [2].The results are very near from those calculated by Borie [3].In this work we study the effect of pion form factor in 1s level for different pionic-hydrogen atoms. In these calculations, the relativistic approach is used. Borie [3] calculated the Lamb shift in case of mionichydrogen atom. The mionic hydrogen (2p 2s) transition was investigated by Carroll et.al. [4]. They used a precise non-perturbative numerical solution of the Dirac equation including the finite size Coulomb force and finite size vacuum polarization.lee et.al. [5] derived a formula for the vacuum polarization correction for the spin zero orbital particle. They used the formula for these corrections based on Klein-Gordon-Fock equation.karshenbiomet. al. [6] used the Uehling potential for calculating one loop vacuum polarization for the pionic circular states. In this work, we usedthis formula to calculate the vacuum polarization corrections in 1s DOI: 1.979/4861-913226 www.iosrjournals.org 2 Page

state for different pionic-hydrogen atoms from Z = 1toZ = 68. The main aim of this work is to show the effect of the pion form factor on these corrections for different pionic-hydrogen atoms. II. Theory The relativistic equation of Klein-Gordon-Fockwhich describes the spin zero particle, has the form E i V r 2 P 2 c 2 m 2 π c 4 Φ i r = (1) Φ i r are not orthogonal and their normalization is not trivial. The solution of this equation with non-coulomb potential is possible [7-8]. The perturbative theory of Coulomb potential has not been developed until now. The vacuum polarization corrections in energy levels are calculated by using a recent form of Lee et.al. [5] E i = Φ o o i E i V o o δv Φ i (2) o o Φ i E i V o o Φ i Where Φ nl o = 1 r R nl (r)y lm (θ, φ) WhereR nl (r)is taken from [2]. In case of electrostatic potential, the equation is valid for any perturbation such as Uehling corrections. The Coulomb problem is considered as an unperturbed case and we take the unperturbed solution of the last equation from [2].The vacuum polarization perturbative potential for finite nuclei including the form factor of pion is obtained by folding the Uehling potential with the extended source distribution and the pion distribution, which has the form, d 3 q e iq.r δv r = 4π 2π 3 q 2 ΠR q 2 ρ N q ρ π q (3) Where ρ N q = d 3 r N e iq.r N ρ N r N ρ π q = d 3 r π e iq.r π ρ π r π, ρ N r N = Zeρ r N, ρ π r π = eρ r π ρ r N is the central nuclear density and is taken in Gaussian, exponential, and Fermi forms and the density of pion,ρ(r π ), is in Gaussian. δv r = 4π 2 α 15m 2 π Substituting the values of ρ N r N and ρ π r π we get δv r = 4π 2 Zα 2 15m 2 π r N 2 dr N ρ r N r N 2 dr N ρ N r N ρ π r r N ρ r r N (4) Substituting into equation 2 we obtain the vacuum polarization correction in the 1s state. To show the effect of the pion form factor we compare δecalculatedusing the pion as a point charge and that calculated in case of pion form factor from equation Where δv r = 4π q 2 Π R q 2 = αq2 πm 2 dv 1 d 3 q 2π 3 e iq.r Π R q 2 ρ N q v 2 1 1 3 v2 1 + q 2 4m 2 1 v2 In this work, we used the following nucleus distributions 1- Fermi distribution αq2 15πm 2 DOI: 1.979/4861-913226 www.iosrjournals.org 21 Page ρ π q ρ F r N = 1 + e r C D Where C is the root mean square radius of the nucleus and D is the diffuseness. 2- Exponential distribution ρ o for small q

ρ E r N = ξ2 8π e ξr N Where ξ = 12 C 2 and the Fourier transform of the exponential distribution is 1 ρ N q = 1 + R 2 q 2 2 R = 1 ξ 3- Gaussian distribution And its Fourier transform is ρ G r N = ξ2 r a 2 π 3 2 e a3 ρ π q = e a2 q 2 4 Table 1. Vacuum Polarization corrections for the energy level 1s (in MeV) of the pionic-hydrogen atoms calculated by applying Lee [5] method for the spin zero pion particle. DOI: 1.979/4861-913226 www.iosrjournals.org 22 Page

Fig.2 Three spherical symmetric charge densities ofthe nucleus, for Z=11 Fig.3 Represents the 1s square of the radial unperturbed wave function R 2 1 (r) r 2 obtained from equation (1). Fig.4 The figure represents different forms of the potential for Z=11 as an example. DOI: 1.979/4861-913226 www.iosrjournals.org 23 Page

Fig.5 The effect of the pion radius on the potential of fermi distributed nucleus and Gaussian pion form factor. Fig.6 Represents the vacuum polarization corrections for the 1s energy level for different Z pionichydrogen atoms. III. Results And Discussion In these calculations we use the relativistic unitsħ = c = 1, the pion massm π = 139.577 MeV, the electron mass m e =.519989 MeV and the fine structure constant α = 1 137.359998, and the radius of pion is.61 ±.15 fm [9]. Figure 2 shows the three different distributions mentioned above. In the short range, the exponential density is higher than the Gaussian density and the Gaussian is higher than the Fermi distribution. For higher distances, they are approximately the same. Figure 3 represents the 1s square of the unperturbed radial wave function of pion obtained from equation (1) against r, for Z = 11 and radius 2.986 fm [1] and reduced mass19.738 MeV. From the figure, it is clear that most contribution of the wave function is found at the origin, so that the potential that has large values at the origin will give a large correction to the energy.from figures 4-a,4-b, and 4-c it is clear that these potentials have large overlap with the wave function since the maximum exists at the origin, like the wave function. The point nucleus potential with Gaussian form factor, fig. 4-c, has the shortest range (1.2 fm), while the pion point potential with Gaussian, Fermi, and exponential form DOI: 1.979/4861-913226 www.iosrjournals.org 24 Page

factor of the nucleus has a range of about 5 fm. Figure 4-d has three maxima for the three potentials. The potential with the Fermi nucleus and Gaussian pion form factor has the highest peak. The potential with exponential nucleus distribution and pion Gaussian distribution has the lowest peak. These peaks are not at the origin hence the values of the corrections corresponding to these three potentials are smaller than the other potentials because the overlap of these potentials with the wave function is small. The position of these peaks is as follows VGF at r = 2.749 fm, VGG at r = 2.473 fm, and VGE at r = 2.113 fm. To show the effect of the pion radius on the potential, figure 5 is drawn. From the figure, it is clear that the peak decreases when the radius of pion increases. For the energy, the increase in radius of pion decreases the value of the vacuum polarization correction, e.g. for Z = 11, E = 6.476599 1 6 MeV for pion radius.76 fm and E = 6.88418 1 6 MeV for pion radius.61 fm.from figure 6 and table 1, we can conclude that without form factor of nucleus and pion the correction increases very slowly for low Zatoms and increases fastly for higher Z. The finite size of the nucleus increases the correction with Z in case of exponential distribution; while in case of Gaussian distribution, the increase is less. For Fermi distribution there is a fast increase at low values of Z and faslty decreases with higher values ofz. The effect of form factor of pion on the correction is very clear for low Z nuclei and then becomes nearly constant for higher values Z. Acknowledgment The first author would like to thank Professor A. Faessler and professor W. Griener for their help and encouraging. References [1]. M El shabshiry, S.M.E. Ismaeel, and M.M. Abdel-Mageed, IOSR Jornal of applied Physics, e- ISSN: 2278-4861. Volume 7, Issue 5 Ver. I. 215, pp 6-66. [2]. M El shabshiry, S.M.E. Ismaeel, and M.M. Abdel-Mageed, IOSR Jornal of applied Physics, e- ISSN: 2278-4861. Volume 8, Issue 1 Ver. III. 216, pp 47-53. [3]. E. Borie, Phys. Rev. A71 3258 (25). [4]. J.D. Carroll, A.W. Thomas, J.Rafelski and A.G. Miller, Phys. Rev. A84 1256 (211). [5]. R.N. Lee, A. I. Milstein and S. G. karshenboim, Phys. Rev. A73 1255 (26). [6]. S.G. Karshenboim, E. Yu. Korzinin and V.G. Ivanov, Canadian Journal of Physics 84 (2) 17-113 (26). [7]. V.S. Popov, Sov. Jour. Nucl. Phys. 12, 235 (1971). [8]. W. Fleischer and G. Soff, Z. Naturforschung 11, 73 (1984). DOI: 1.979/4861-913226 www.iosrjournals.org 25 Page

[9]. G. T. Adylovet. al. Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 51, Issue 4, page 42-46 (1974). [1]. B A Brown, C R Bronk and P E Hodgson, J. Phys. G. Nucl. Phys. 1 (1984) 1683-171. Printed in Great Britain. DOI: 1.979/4861-913226 www.iosrjournals.org 26 Page