Quantum Cloning WOOTTERS-ZUREK CLONER

Similar documents
Optimal cloning of photonic quantum states

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006

UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. Why It Is Hard to See Schrödinger s Cat: Sadegh Raeisi A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES

1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics

Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract

MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 7 Apr 2014

Chapter 2 The Density Matrix

Lecture: Quantum Information

CS120, Quantum Cryptography, Fall 2016

Optical quantum cloning

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

Physics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 6

Flocks of Quantum Clones: Multiple Copying of Qubits

QUANTUM INFORMATION -THE NO-HIDING THEOREM p.1/36

Local cloning of entangled states

Concepts and Algorithms of Scientific and Visual Computing Advanced Computation Models. CS448J, Autumn 2015, Stanford University Dominik L.

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006

TELEBROADCASTING OF ENTANGLED TWO-SPIN-1/2 STATES

Simple scheme for efficient linear optics quantum gates

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 16 Jan 2006

Quantum field theory and Green s function

PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix

Quantum Teleportation

Quantum Measurements: some technical background

Lecture 13B: Supplementary Notes on Advanced Topics. 1 Inner Products and Outer Products for Single Particle States

Quantum Interference of Unpolarized Single Photons

Lecture 1: Introduction to Quantum Computing

Hilbert Space, Entanglement, Quantum Gates, Bell States, Superdense Coding.

Quantum information processing. Two become one

Experimental continuous-variable cloning of partial quantum information

Optimal copying of entangled two-qubit states

FIG. 16: A Mach Zehnder interferometer consists of two symmetric beam splitters BS1 and BS2

Lecture 11 September 30, 2015

Problem Set: TT Quantum Information

Introduction to Quantum Computing

M.L. Dalla Chiara, R. Giuntini, R. Leporini, G. Sergioli. Qudit Spaces and a Many-valued Approach to Quantum Comp

REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 77, OCTOBER 2005

Transmitting and Hiding Quantum Information

Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 2

5th March Unconditional Security of Quantum Key Distribution With Practical Devices. Hermen Jan Hupkes

Quantum Error Correcting Codes and Quantum Cryptography. Peter Shor M.I.T. Cambridge, MA 02139

A review on quantum teleportation based on: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen channels

Broadcasting of Entanglement and Consequences on Quantum Information Processing

Quantum Information Processing and Diagrams of States

Ensembles and incomplete information

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 30 Dec 2018

arxiv:quant-ph/ v3 18 Jan 2004

Unitary Dynamics and Quantum Circuits

Quantum Entanglement and Error Correction

Decoherence and the Classical Limit

Quantum Teleportation

b) (5 points) Give a simple quantum circuit that transforms the state

Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871

Quantum Teleportation with Photons. Bouwmeester, D; Pan, J-W; Mattle, K; et al. "Experimental quantum teleportation". Nature 390, 575 (1997).

The Stern-Gerlach experiment and spin

Analogy between optimal spin estimation and interferometry

Three problems from quantum optics

This is the important completeness relation,

Quantum algorithms (CO 781, Winter 2008) Prof. Andrew Childs, University of Waterloo LECTURE 1: Quantum circuits and the abelian QFT

Quantum NP - Cont. Classical and Quantum Computation A.Yu Kitaev, A. Shen, M. N. Vyalyi 2002

arxiv: v1 [physics.ed-ph] 5 Dec 2013

Quantum Dense Coding and Quantum Teleportation

Weak measurement and quantum interference

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 18 Jan 2006

Equal Superposition Transformations and Quantum Random Walks

6.1 Main properties of Shannon entropy. Let X be a random variable taking values x in some alphabet with probabilities.

Logical error rate in the Pauli twirling approximation

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 22 May 1998

Lecture 1: Introduction to Quantum Computing

Introduction to Quantum Computation

Talk by Johannes Vrana

Experiment 6 - Tests of Bell s Inequality

2. Introduction to quantum mechanics

10 - February, 2010 Jordan Myronuk

Generation and classification of robust remote symmetric Dicke states

Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

No-cloning of nonorthogonal states does not require inner product preserving

Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics

Quantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar

Frequency and time... dispersion-cancellation, etc.

Compute the Fourier transform on the first register to get x {0,1} n x 0.

Chapter 5. Density matrix formalism

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 9 Nov 2005

Grover s algorithm. We want to find aa. Search in an unordered database. QC oracle (as usual) Usual trick

Detection of Eavesdropping in Quantum Key Distribution using Bell s Theorem and Error Rate Calculations

Introduction to Quantum Error Correction

Does Quantum Measurement Violate the Conservation of Angular Momentum? A Paradox Resolved Rick Bradford, 6/12/16

MITOCW watch?v=0usje5vtiks

DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS

Quantum wires, orthogonal polynomials and Diophantine approximation

Mixed-state sensitivity of several quantum-information benchmarks

Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects

New schemes for manipulating quantum states using a Kerr cell. Istituto Elettrotecnico Nazionale Galileo Ferraris, Str. delle Cacce 91, I Torino

9. Distance measures. 9.1 Classical information measures. Head Tail. How similar/close are two probability distributions? Trace distance.

Quantum Gates, Circuits & Teleportation

High Fidelity to Low Weight. Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute

This operator has a kernel that can calculated. In one dimension it is given by. ( 2 + E) 1 (x, y) = 1 2. E e. 1 e E x y

Delayed Choice Paradox

Transcription:

Quantum Cloning Quantum cloning has been a topic of considerable interest for many years. It turns out to be quantum limit for copying an input state and is closely related to linear amplification when talking about optical cloning. It is commonly stated that it is impossible to clone. In actuallity it is possible to clone perfectly, one just needs to know the input state. As Wootters and Zurek showed it is impossible to clone any arbitrary unknown state with perfect fidelity. This became affectionately known as the no cloning theorem, although it is more correctly called the no perfect cloning theorem. In fact, it may be safe to say that quantum information was founded based on this theorem. WOOTTERS-ZUREK CLONER The Wootters-Zurek theorem goes something like this. Suppose we have a two state particle which we wish to copy. The quantum states of the particle are given by 0 a and 1 a, where the subscript a denotes a spatio-temporal mode for the particle. Suppose initially we are given a state 0 a and we have a quantum cloning machine in state Q x. The cloning machine then performs the operation 0 a Q x 0 a 0 b Q 0 x (1) where the subscript b denotes a unique spatio-temporal mode with respect to a. Thus, the cloning machine has made an exact copy in another place while keeping the original. Now, suppose that we are given the 1 a instead. We wish to have the cloner behave as 1 a Q x 1 a 1 b Q 1 x (2) So far so good. These transformations are perfectly allowed by quantum mechanics. Thus, as long as we know the basis of the states, it is possible to perfectly clone. In fact, these transformations are achieved by a controlled-not gate. Now suppose that we are given a state which is a superposition of the two basis states s a = α 0 a + β 0 a (3)

where α and β satisfy α 2 + β 2 = 1. The cloning operation must then obey the following transformation s a Q x α 0 a 0 b Q 0 x + β 1 a 1 b Q 1 x (4) The density matrix for the output system is then given by ρ = α α 0 a 0 b Q 0 xx Q 0 b 0 a 0 + αβ 0 a 0 b Q 0 xx Q 1 b 1 a 1 + α β 1 a 1 b Q 1 xx Q 0 b 0 a 1 + β β 1 a 1 b Q 1 xx Q 1 b 1 a 1 (5) We assume that the machine states form an orthonormal set, namely x Q 0 Q 0 x = x Q 1 Q 1 x = x Q Q x = 1 (6) and x Q 0 Q 1 x = x Q 0 Q x = x Q 1 Q x = 0 (7) We are only interested at looking at the original and the copy after the cloning. However, it can be seen that the machine states are entangled to the states of the copy and clone. To observe the copy and clone by themselves, we must trace over the machine states. The orthonormality of the machine states makes the transformation simple. The reduced density matrix of the two particle system is then given by ab = T r x [ abx] = α α 0 a 0 bb 0 a 0 + β β 1 a 1 bb 1 a 1 (8) To observe the single particle reduced density matrices, we trace over the states of the other particle. Hence, a = T r b [ ab ] = α α 0 aa 0 + β β 1 aa 1 (9) and b = T r a [ ab ] = α α 0 bb 0 + β β 1 bb 1 (10) It can be seen that the original and the copy have identical outputs. Unfortunately, the original has been modified relative to the input state. We will discuss two ways to measure the modification. The first method is called the fidelity and the second is called the Hilbert-Schmidt norm.

Fidelity The fidelity is found by F = s a s (11) where s is the state of the particle before entering the cloning device. It can then be seen that the fidelity is given by PROVE F = α 4 + β 4 (12) which has a maximum value of 1 for either α = 1 or β = 1 and a minimum value of 1 2 for α = β = 1 2. A fidelity of 1 means that a perfect copy has been made, because the original and the copy both have the same state as the input. A fidelity of 1 2 is not a copy at all, but a maximally mixed state. In fact, if we look closer at the output state in eqn. 4, it can be seen that the original, copy and machine states are maximally entangled. This implies that if one maximally entangles a state to another two state particle, one has made a perfectly bad copy. Also, we learn that a perfect copy can be made if we know the basis that a particle is in. The most important result, is that we cannot inject an arbitrary state into a cloning machine and get a perfect copy. Hilbert-Schmidt norm In the original Buzek-Hillery cloning paper, they used the Hilbert-Schmidt norm to measure a scalar distance between two density matrices. The Hilbert-Schmidt norm is defined as where ρ s is the density matrix of the input state D = T r[(ρ s a ) 2 ] (13) ρ s = α α 0 aa 0 + αβ 0 aa 1 + α β 1 aa 0 + β β 1 aa 1 (14) Hence, PROVE D = 2 α 2 β 2 (15)

which has a minimum value when either α = 1, β = 0 or β = 1, α = 0. In this case the distance between the density matrix vanishes, which means that the original is unchanged by the cloning process. It also means that the copy is perfect, because the copy is the same as the original. The distance is maximum distance of 1 2 occurs when α = β = 1 2. UNIVERSAL CLONING MACHINE The mathematics of the universal cloning machine is considerably more involved than the Wootter-Zurek cloner. Buzek and Hillery proposed the first universal cloning machine. The idea is that a cloning machine can accept an arbitrary input state and copy it with the same fidelity for all possible states. The first experimentally realizable cloning machine was proposed by Simon et al. However, the proposal was different than the Buzek-Hillery cloner, because the original and copy were both in the same spatio-temporal mode. Hence, the mathmetics of the Buzek-Hillery cloner had to be neglected. Essentially, all previous proposals assumed distinguishable particles, whereas the Simon cloner assumed indistinguishable particles. After Simon s proposal, several experiments were realized. The idea is that a seed photon, which is to be copied is injected in an optical parametric amplifier during pair production of entangled photons. Assume that the photon is initially horizontally polarized in the state s = a hc 0 (16) where the hc subscript denotes a the to-be-cloned horizontally polarized photon created in mode a. The pair production state is given by ψ = 1 (a hd 2 b v + a vd b h ) 0 (17) where the hp subscript, for example, represents a horizontally polarized photon created by It should be noticed that the original photon to be cloned and one of the photons are both created in the same mode a. Also, it is interesting to note that if one traces over the states of the photon in mode b, then the photon in mode a is a maximally mixed state, which is represented by a Bloch vector of zero length in the Bloch sphere. One can consider a Bloch vector of zero length to be a perfectly blank state (much like a white piece of paper to make a copy on). Also, the photon in mode b is the analog of the machine states discussed earlier. Without the machine state, the photon in mode a could not be completely blank. Although,

this was not state, it has been shown that the machine states realize the universality of the cloning machine. The machine states, or states of the other photon or ancilla realize the universality of the cloning machine. The state of the original and down converted pair are given by C = s Ψ = 1 (a hc 2 a hd b v + a hc a vd b h ) 0 (18) If the input photon is made spatially, spectrally and temporally indistinguishable from the down converted photon in mode a, then one obtains, without worrying about normalization C = s Ψ = ((a h )2 b v + a h a vb h ) 0 (19) = 2 2, 0; 0, 1 + 1, 1; 1, 0 (20) The clone thus experiences a boson mode occupation enhancement for the term which has the same polarization and no enhancement for the orthogonal polarization. The fidelity is determined by using photon counting. One simply counts the number of photons weighted by their probability of occuring. The fidelity is then the number of photons with the polarization of the original divided by total of all possible events F = 2 2 + 1 1 2 2 + 2 1 = 5 6 (21) This requires a basis-dependent verification. PROBLEM 1. Phase covariant cloner. Show that if one interferes a circularly polarized photon with a linear polarized photon and postselects only two photon events in one arm of the beam splitter, that all possible linear polarization states will be cloned with 5/6 fidelity.