Ice Accretion Prediction Code

Similar documents
In-flight Ice Accretion Prediction Code

Introductory Thoughts

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF HIGH-LIFT CONFIGURATIONS USING A VISCOUS ADJOINT-BASED METHOD

Study Group Report: Plate-fin Heat Exchangers: AEA Technology

Aircraft Performance - Drag

NGSS High School Physics Domain Model

Kinetics of Particles. Chapter 3

Introduction: A Generalized approach for computing the trajectories associated with the Newtonian N Body Problem

Phys101 Final Code: 1 Term: 132 Wednesday, May 21, 2014 Page: 1

Increasing Heat Transfer in Microchannels with Surface Acoustic Waves*

Short notes for Heat transfer

Conceptual Dynamics SDC. An Interactive Text and Workbook. Kirstie Plantenberg Richard Hill. Better Textbooks. Lower Prices.

Module 4: General Formulation of Electric Circuit Theory

(1.1) V which contains charges. If a charge density ρ, is defined as the limit of the ratio of the charge contained. 0, and if a force density f

ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF POROSITY ON UNSTEADY COUETTE FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER BETWEEN PARALLEL POROUS PLATES WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAYING PRESSURE GRADIENT

Solution to HW14 Fall-2002

Design Optimization of Multi Element High Lift Configurations. Using a Viscous Continuous Adjoint Method

Numerical Simulation of the Flow Field in a Friction-Type Turbine (Tesla Turbine)

7.0 Heat Transfer in an External Laminar Boundary Layer

Homework 1 AERE355 Fall 2017 Due 9/1(F) NOTE: If your solution does not adhere to the format described in the syllabus, it will be grade as zero.

Study Guide Physics Pre-Comp 2013

Numerical Simulation of the Thermal Resposne Test Within the Comsol Multiphysics Environment

Dispersion of Contaminants in the Ocean

February 28, 2013 COMMENTS ON DIFFUSION, DIFFUSIVITY AND DERIVATION OF HYPERBOLIC EQUATIONS DESCRIBING THE DIFFUSION PHENOMENA

Fall 2013 Physics 172 Recitation 3 Momentum and Springs

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT OF OUTFLOW OPENING FOR PREDICTING CROSS-VENTILATION FLOW RATE

Q x = cos 1 30 = 53.1 South

Collective effects in Beam Dynamics

k-nearest Neighbor How to choose k Average of k points more reliable when: Large k: noise in attributes +o o noise in class labels

Examiner: Dr. Mohamed Elsharnoby Time: 180 min. Attempt all the following questions Solve the following five questions, and assume any missing data

z = Geometric height (m)

Figure 1a. A planar mechanism.

BLAST / HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS

Derailment Safety Evaluation by Analytic Equations

Q1. In figure 1, Q = 60 µc, q = 20 µc, a = 3.0 m, and b = 4.0 m. Calculate the total electric force on q due to the other 2 charges.

SMART TESTING BOMBARDIER THOUGHTS

Free Vibrations of Catenary Risers with Internal Fluid

Coupling High Fidelity Body Modeling with Non- Keplerian Dynamics to Design AIM-MASCOT-2 Landing Trajectories on Didymos Binary Asteroid

Forward-Integration Riccati-Based Feedback Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers on Elliptic Orbits

Principles of Organic Chemistry lecture 5, page 1

1/2 and e0 e s ' 1+ imm w 4 M s 3 πρ0 r 3 m. n 0 ktr. .Also,since n 0 ktr 1,wehave. 4 3 M sπρ 0 r 3. ktr. 3 M sπρ 0

Honors Physics Final Review Summary

Propeller Performance Analysis Using Lifting Line Theory. by Kevin M. Flood B.S., (1997) Hobart College M.A., (2002) Webster University

" 1 = # $H vap. Chapter 3 Problems

Rotating Radial Duct

A Study of Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Anti-tank Missile

Chapter 4. Unsteady State Conduction

FIELD QUALITY IN ACCELERATOR MAGNETS

Professional Development. Implementing the NGSS: High School Physics

Numerical study on flow separation control over NACA0015 aerofoil using electromagnetic fields

Kinematic transformation of mechanical behavior Neville Hogan

Course Stabilty of Structures

Yeu-Sheng Paul Shiue, Ph.D 薛宇盛 Professor and Chair Mechanical Engineering Department Christian Brothers University 650 East Parkway South Memphis, TN

Assume that the water in the nozzle is accelerated at a rate such that the frictional effect can be neglected.

Design Optimization of High Lift Configurations Using a Viscous Continuous Adjoint Method

NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

AUTOMOTIVE RADIATOR - DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION

Advanced Heat and Mass Transfer by Amir Faghri, Yuwen Zhang, and John R. Howell

STUDIES OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACHES TO VISCOUS AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ J] dt x x hard to solve in general solve it numerically. If there is no convection. is in the absence of reaction n

17 IMPACT PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITES

THE PARTITION OF ENERGY INTO WAVES AND CURRENTS

ES201 - Examination 2 Winter Adams and Richards NAME BOX NUMBER

Pressure And Entropy Variations Across The Weak Shock Wave Due To Viscosity Effects

bulk velocity through orifice,

making triangle (ie same reference angle) ). This is a standard form that will allow us all to have the X= y=

Reduction of the Adjoint Gradient Formula in the Continuous Limit

Enhancing Performance of MLP/RBF Neural Classifiers via an Multivariate Data Distribution Scheme

Math 302 Learning Objectives

Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors

COMP 551 Applied Machine Learning Lecture 5: Generative models for linear classification

Compressibility Effects

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method

CS 477/677 Analysis of Algorithms Fall 2007 Dr. George Bebis Course Project Due Date: 11/29/2007

Chapter 2 GAUSS LAW Recommended Problems:

convection coefficient. The different property values of water at 20 C are given by: u W/m K, h=8062 W/m K

AEDC-TR ABLATION TESTING IN HOT AND COLD COAXIAL JETS - PHASE I, COLD FLOW FEASIBILITY TESTS. April 1970

CHAPTER 6 -- ENERGY. Approach #2: Using the component of mg along the line of d:

MATHEMATICS SYLLABUS SECONDARY 5th YEAR

ELECTRON CYCLOTRON HEATING OF AN ANISOTROPIC PLASMA. December 4, PLP No. 322

SOLUTION OF THREE-CONSTRAINT ENTROPY-BASED VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION

The Effect of Scaling of Owl s Flight Feather on Aerodynamic Noise at Inter-coach Space of High Speed Trains based on Biomimetic Analogy

ON THE COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN METHODS FOR IMPROOVING THE GEAR TRANSMISSION PERFORMANCES

Computational modeling techniques

Effects of piezo-viscous dependency on squeeze film between circular plates: Couple Stress fluid model

ENGI 4430 Parametric Vector Functions Page 2-01

Process Engineering Thermodynamics E (4 sp) Exam

Lattice specific heat of carbon nanotubes.

Fast Fourier Transform-based micromechanical modeling of polycrystals with direct input from microstructural images

Guaranteeing Reliability with Vibration Simulation and Testing. Dr. Nathan Blattau

3D FE Modeling Simulation of Cold Rotary Forging with Double Symmetry Rolls X. H. Han 1, a, L. Hua 1, b, Y. M. Zhao 1, c

Q1. A) 48 m/s B) 17 m/s C) 22 m/s D) 66 m/s E) 53 m/s. Ans: = 84.0 Q2.

THE TOPOLOGY OF SURFACE SKIN FRICTION AND VORTICITY FIELDS IN WALL-BOUNDED FLOWS

Analysis of Hydrodynamics and Heat Transfer in a Thin Liquid Film Flowing Over a Rotating Disk by the Integral Method

The challenges of Linearized Physics (LP) in Data Assimilation (DA)

PSU GISPOPSCI June 2011 Ordinary Least Squares & Spatial Linear Regression in GeoDa

Comparison of hybrid ensemble-4dvar with EnKF and 4DVar for regional-scale data assimilation

OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED PLYWOOD PLATES UNDER COMBINED EDGEWISE BENDING AND COMPRESSION

Surface and Contact Stress

Edexcel GCSE Physics

Transcription:

Ice Accretin Predictin Cde Vladimír Hrák University f Defence Institute f Hydrdynamics, Academy f Sciences Czech Republic 1

Dedicated t the memry f Dr. Bhumír Hření 2

Mtivatin The in-flight icing may affect all types f aircraft. Presence f ice n an aircraft surface can lead t a number f perfrmance degradatins: changes in pressure distributin decreased maximum lift and increased drag stall ccurring at lwer angles f attack and increased stall speed reduced cntrllability It is imprtant t t understand d hw the different ice shapes affect aircraft aerdynamics. It can be studied by flight tests, wind tunnel measurements, and cmputatinal simulatins. 3

Cmputatinal simulatin f ice accretin is an essential tl in design, develpment and certificatin f aircraft fr flight int icing cnditins. Currently, there exist several apprved ice accretin cdes: LEWICE (LEWis ICE accretin prgram) is sftware develped by the Icing Branch at NASA Glenn Research Center CANICE cde develped at the Ecle Plytechniue de Mntreal ONERA (Office Natinal d'etudes et de Recherches Aérspatiales) cde in France TRAJICE cde which was develped by DERA (Defence Evaluatin and Research Agency) in United Kingdm CIRA cde frm Italian Aerspace Research Center. 4

Ice Accretin Predictin Cde Cde was develped as a tl fr simulating flight int icing cnditins Presented sftware was subseuently develped and imprved. There are three main cde versins: R-Ice 1.1 Rime ice accretin predictin Ice 3.1 Glaze ice accretin predictin Ice 4.1 Multi-element airfils icing 5

Trajectry f water drplets The ptential flw field is calculated using 2-D panel methd. The relatin fr any pint inside the cntrl area is in frm Ptential flw field is then used t determine the trajectries f water drplets and the impingement pints n the bdy. Drplets passing thrugh the atmsphere are cnsidered as spherical elements n that the surrunding fluid frces and gravitatin act. Small water drplets have trajectries similar t streamlines, vice versa large water drplets trajectries are affected by the airfil inherency nly slightly. 6

Versin 1.1 Airfil rime ice accretin predictin Impinging super-cled water drplets freeze immediately upn impact. Cde applies a time-stepping prcedure t calculate the shape f an ice accretin. 0,050 0,050 y/c [1] y/c [1] 0,025 0,025 0,000 Chrd=0.9144 m; Vext=92.54 m.s -1 ; FluidP=100000 Pa; FluidT=257.6 K; Alpha=0 ; PartD=0.00002 m; PartCntent=0.00033 kg.m -3 ; RimeIceRh=900 kg.m -3 ; Steps=5; TimeStep=64.8 s; Time=324 s. 0,000 Chrd=0.9144 m; Vext=92.54 m.s -1 ; FluidP=100000 Pa; FluidT=257.6 K; Alpha=0 ; PartD=0.00002 m; PartCntent=0.00033 kg.m -3, RimeIceRh=900kg.m -3 ; Steps=5; TimeStep=244.8 s; Time=1224 s. -0,025-0,025-0,050-0,025 0,000 0,025 0,050 x/c [1] -0,050-0,050-0,025 0,000 0,025 0,050 x/c [1] 7

Quantitative cmparisn f using the current cmputatinal iceaccretin simulatin methds. 0,050 y/c [1] 0,025 0,000-0,025 Clean Airfil Experimental ONERA1990 Simn CANICE Paraschiviu TRAJICE ADSE ONERA2000 Duprat NASA R-ICE Generally, current ice accretin cdes give satisfied results f fthe rime ice simulatin. -0,050-0,025 0,000 0,025 0,050 x/c [1] 0,075 0,050 y/c [1] 0,025 0,000-0,025 Clean Airfil Experimental ONERA1990 Simn CANICE Paraschiviu TRAJICE ADSE ONERA2000 Duprat NASA R-ICE -0,050-0,050-0,025 0,000 0,025 x/c [1] 0,050 8

Versin 3.1 Airfil glaze ice accretin predictin Glaze ice creates at cmbinatins f temperature clse t freezing. Evapratin In that case, nt all f the impinging ev p water freezes n impact. Liuid water Thin layer f water is flwing very fr slwly alng the surface and freeze at ther lcatins. Ice accretin Bundary layer There are used theretical appraches are generally called as a shallw water thery. The cnservative euatins using fr the slutin f water flw in pen channels are frmally arranged. The flux terms are evaluated using a discntinuus Galerkin methd based n finite-vlume frmulatin. 9

Mass, mtin, and energy cnservative euatins culd be written in the general frm x t S S F Q general frm Q A Vectrs f variables Q, flw F and surces S, S are given by relatins: flw crss-sectin mass flux A EQ I g A Q Q E Q A n 1 2, F Q flw crss-sectin flw vlume thermal energy mass flux mmentum flux flux f energy A EQ E A dx dp A g I g t 2 0 S Internal T T T T A dx dp A g I g e e e w w w e e w w t n 2 S surces: f ev w fr w p e v v v S External surces: 10 ev ev w fr fr w p p e ev w fr w px p e L L ct ct ct v v v S surces:

Example f glaze ice-accretin simulatin. Airfil NAC 0012, chrd 0.45 m, angle f attack α = 0, velcity v =772ms -1 77.2, MVD = 18 μm, LWC = 0.32 g m -3, air temperature T = 270.5 K, icing expsitin 300 s. 006 0,06 y/b 0,04 0,02 0,00-0,02-0,04-0,06-0,02 0,00 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 x/b 0,10 Clean Airfil Experimental Paraschiviu CANICE ADSE TRAJICE Duprat ONERA NASA LEWICE Cmparisn f current ice-accretin cdes shws there is still rm fr imprvement in the uality f predictins. 11

Air temperature influence n iced airfil shapes Stream-wise shape (b), (c) Duble-hrn shape (d), (e) Span-wise ridge shape (f) (a) Rime ice (b) T = 269.6565 K (c) T = 270.15 K (d) T = 270.65 K (e) T = 271.65 K (f) T = 272.65 K Airfil NFL0414, chrd 0.45 m, angle f attack α = 0, velcity v = 77.2 m s -1, MVD = 18 μm, LWC = 0.32 g m -3, icing expsitin 900 s. 12

Versin 4.1 Multi-element airfils icing The latest cde versin enables slutin f multi-element airfils up t eight separate parts. Mutual flw verlap f circumfluent bdies ccurs. Drplet trajectries near an airfil with a sltted flap Drplet trajectries near an airfil with a sltted flap in landing psitin 13

Example f flapped airfil icing Ice accretin n the flap causes the reductin f the gap size between main element and flap. Cnseuently, it can have a large impact n the perfrmance degradatin f iced multi-element airfils. There is a ptential mechanical prblem in the elevatr mechanism itself. 14

Input file Cnfiguratin file: _ice.cfg Icing parameters # cnfiguratin file # ------------------ PrfDta=NACA0018 # NACA0018 Chrd=1 # 1.0;<0.1,10> Vext=50 # 50.0;<10,200> Alpha=5 # 5.0;<-20,20> FluidP=100000 # 1.e5;<0.1e5,1.2e5> 1e5 1 FluidT=263 # 263;<200,300> PartCntent=0.001 # 1.e-3;<0.05e-3,5.e-3> PartD=0.0001 # 100e-6;<5.e-6,5000.e-6> PartT=274.15 # 274.15;<200,300> BdyT=263.15 # 263.15;<200,300> RimeIceRh=900 # 900;<700,1000> GlaseIceRh=917 # 917;<700,1000> # ------------------ TimeStep=120 # 120;<1,600> Steps=5 # 5;<1,1000> MinBdyPints=50 # 50;<20,500> 15

Graphical utput files Airfil gemetry gem004.eps Successive ice accretin by steps mdif004.eps Drplet trajectries near iced airfil part004.eps p 16

beta004.eps Water drplets lcal cllectin efficiency β, nrmal v n and tangential v t velcity with regard t the airfil surface at impact lcatin 17

blay004.eps Parameters f bundary layer: Lcal frictin cefficient c f, displacement bundary layer thickness δ 1 (mass) and δ 2 (impulse), and Nusselt number Nu 18

flw004.eps Distributin f pressure cefficient c p and relative velcity v/v 19

flw005.dta Text utput file 1.000000 Chrd [m] 2.087219 Length [m] 5.000000 Alpha [st] 50.000000 Vext [m/s] 1.000000e+005 FluidP [Pa] 263.000000 FluidT [K] 1324643 1.324643 FluidRh [kg/m^3] 1.246121e-005 FluidNu [m^2/s] 1.000000e-004 PartD [m] 274.150000 PartT [K] 1.000000e-003 PartCntent [kg/m^3] 1000.000000 PartRh [kg/m^3] 263.150000 BdyT [K] # s[m] x[m] y[m] v[m/s] beta[-] vn[m/s] vt[m/s] cp[-] cf[-] Nu[-] -1.0395e+000 +9.9210e-001-8.7863e-002-3.2739e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +5.7127e-001 +0.0000e+000 6.7548e+002-1.0353e+000 +9.8800e-001-8.8559e-002-3.2634e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +5.7400e-001 +0.0000e+000 6.7548e+002-1.0311e+000 +9.8390e-001-8.9234e-002-3.4098e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +5.3493e-001 +0.0000e+000 6.7548e+002-1.0270e+000 +9.7979e-001-8.9889e-002-3.6759e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +4.5952e-001 +0.0000e+000 6.7548e+002-1.0228e+000 +9.7568e-001-9.0526e-002-3.8835e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +3.9672e-001 +0.0000e+000 6.7548e+002-1.0187e+000 +9.7157e-001-9.1144e-002-4.0328e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +3.4946e-001 +0.0000e+000 6.7548e+002...... +1.0187e+000 +000 +9.7264e-001-7.8940e-002 78940 002 +4.1296e+001 +001 0.0000e+0000000 +0.0000e+000 0000 +000 +0.0000e+000 0000 +000+31785 +3.1785e-001 +0.0000e+000 0000 +000 3.2149e+003 +1.0228e+000 +9.7658e-001-8.0263e-002 +3.9687e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +3.6997e-001 +0.0000e+000 3.2149e+003 +1.0270e+000 +9.8052e-001-8.1603e-002 +3.7486e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +4.3793e-001 +0.0000e+000 3.2149e+003 +1.0311e+000 +9.8445e-001-8.2961e-002 +3.4692e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +5.1859e-001 +0.0000e+000 3.2149e+003 +1.0353e+000 +9.8837e-001-8.4338e-002 +3.3053e+001 0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 +5.6299e-001 +0.0000e+000 3.2149e+003 +1.0395e+000 +9.9229e-001 9229e-001-8.5735e-002 +3.2948e+001 0.0000e+000 0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 0000e+000 +0.0000e+000 0000e+000 +5.6577e-001 +0.0000e+000 0000e+000 3.2149e+003 #end 20

Clsing remarks ICE cde enables cmputatinal rime ice and glaze ice accretin predictin n single and multi-element airfils in acceptable time f slutin. Mathematical ti mdel has recently been mdified d fr variable wall temperature alng the airfil surface. The cde was als imprved fr the better apprximatin f transitin bundary layer lcatin. Presented cde culd be cnsidered at least as a fully cmparable with the current ice accretin predictin cdes. 21

Thank yu fr yur attentin 22