Chow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups

Similar documents
Computers work exceptionally on Lie groups

Cohomology theories on projective homogeneous varieties

Another proof of the global F -regularity of Schubert varieties

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications

(Equivariant) Chern-Schwartz-MacPherson classes

Parabolic subgroups Montreal-Toronto 2018

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

Littlewood Richardson coefficients for reflection groups

Characteristic classes in the Chow ring

Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY. p : E B such that there exist a countable open covering {U i } i I of B and homeomorphisms

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Equivariant K -theory and hook formula for skew shape on d-complete set

Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Betti numbers of abelian covers

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

Spherical varieties and arc spaces

7.3 Singular Homology Groups

Characteristic classes and Invariants of Spin Geometry

THE S 1 -EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY RINGS OF (n k, k) SPRINGER VARIETIES

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6

Equivariant Algebraic K-Theory

NOTES ON POINCARÉ SERIES OF FINITE AND AFFINE COXETER GROUPS

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

Chern Classes and the Chern Character

Free Loop Cohomology of Complete Flag Manifolds

PERMUTATION REPRESENTATIONS ON SCHUBERT VARIETIES arxiv:math/ v2 [math.rt] 4 Jun 2007

Chern classes à la Grothendieck

Combinatorial models for the variety of complete quadrics

LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

THE p-smooth LOCUS OF SCHUBERT VARIETIES. Let k be a ring and X be an n-dimensional variety over C equipped with the classical topology.

Lecture on Equivariant Cohomology

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

Geometry and combinatorics of spherical varieties.

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 28 Sep 2016

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Generically split projective homogeneous varieties

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Geometry of Schubert varieties and Demazure character formula

The tangent space to an enumerative problem

Math 210C. The representation ring

arxiv: v4 [math.rt] 9 Jun 2017

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

Kraśkiewicz-Pragacz modules and some positivity properties of Schubert polynomials

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 17 Apr 2015

3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).

Rigid Schubert classes in compact Hermitian symmetric spaces

Recall for an n n matrix A = (a ij ), its trace is defined by. a jj. It has properties: In particular, if B is non-singular n n matrix,

Intersection Theory course notes

Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE ONE: PREVIEW

STEENROD OPERATIONS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

Moment map flows and the Hecke correspondence for quivers

COMBINATORIAL MODELS FOR THE VARIETY OF COMPLETE QUADRICS

ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS

ON AN INFINITE LIMIT OF BGG CATEGORIES O

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

Cover Page. Author: Yan, Qijun Title: Adapted deformations and the Ekedahl-Oort stratifications of Shimura varieties Date:

DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES

ADVANCED TOPICS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

Bruhat order, rationally smooth Schubert varieties, and hyperplane arrangements

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

Equivariant cohomology of infinite-dimensional Grassmannian and shifted Schur functions

Research Statement. Edward Richmond. October 13, 2012

Algebraic Cobordism. 2nd German-Chinese Conference on Complex Geometry East China Normal University Shanghai-September 11-16, 2006.

Representations of semisimple Lie algebras

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

COMBINATORIAL CURVE NEIGHBORHOODS FOR THE AFFINE FLAG MANIFOLD OF TYPE A 1 1

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

Joint work with Milen Yakimov. Kent Vashaw. November 19, Louisiana State University Prime Spectra of 2-Categories.

Math 249B. Tits systems

A note on Samelson products in the exceptional Lie groups

Comparison of the Weyl integration formula and the equivariant localization formula for a maximal torus of Sp(1)

EXCEPTIONAL COLLECTIONS OF LINE BUNDLES ON PROJECTIVE HOMOGENEOUS VARIETIES ALEXEY ANANYEVSKIY, ASHER AUEL, SKIP GARIBALDI AND KIRILL ZAINOULLINE

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE TWO: DEFINITIONS AND BASIC PROPERTIES

Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.

Algebraic v.s. Analytic Point of View

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8

Delzant s Garden. A one-hour tour to symplectic toric geometry

Characteristic Classes, Chern Classes and Applications to Intersection Theory

A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM

1. Quivers and their representations: Basic definitions and examples.

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

Counting matrices over finite fields

NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE AND COBORDISM TYPE. 1. Introduction

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups

ON ORBIT CLOSURES OF SYMMETRIC SUBGROUPS IN FLAG VARIETIES

PATTERN AVOIDANCE AND RATIONAL SMOOTHNESS OF SCHUBERT VARIETIES SARA C. BILLEY

Transcription:

Chow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups Shizuo Kaji joint with Masaki Nakagawa Workshop on Schubert calculus 2008 at Kansai Seminar House Mar. 20, 2008

Outline Introduction Our problem (algebraic geometory) Cohomology of flag variety Borel presentation (algebraic topology) Schubert presentation (geometry) Divided difference operator (combinatorics) Computations and Main Theorems (man & computer power) Future Work

Notations G: simply connected simple complex Lie group B: Borel subgroup of G l: rank of G G/B: a projective variety called the flag variety associated to G H (G/B; Z): ordinary integral cohomology of G/B A (G): Chow ring of G

Main goal General Goal Determine A (G) for all simply connected simple complex Lie groups Classification Theorem tells that G is one of the following types: SL n, Spin(n), Sp(n), G 2, F 4, E 6, E 7, E 8 Grothendieck considered the problem in the 1950 s. He gave a formula to compute it from H (G/B; Z). Consequently, A (G) was determined to be trivial for G = SL n, Sp(n). A (G) Z/p was determined by Kac(1985) for all G. A (G) for G = Spin(n), G 2, F 4 were determined by R.Marlin(1974). His method seems to be hopeless for other exceptional types. (Note: Nakagawa also checked the result of Marlin by the same method we use here). Our Goal Today Determine A (G) for G = E 6, E 7, E 8.

What is Chow ring A (X ): the Chow ring of a non-singular variety X A (X ) = i 0 Ai (X ) A i (X ) is a group of the rational equivalence classes of algebraic cycles of codimension i. (an algebraic cycle is a linear sum of possibly singular subvarieties) intersection product A i (X ) A j (X ) A i+j (X )

Basic Facts Theorem (Grothendieck(1958)) the cycle map cl : A (G/B) H 2 (G/B; Z) is an isomorphism of rings: A (G/B) H 2 (G/B; Z) = H (G/B; Z). the pullback of the projection p : G G/B induces a surjection p : A (G/B) A (G), where the kernel is an ideal generated by A 1 (G/B). Corollary A (G) = H (G/B; Z)/(H 2 (G/B; Z)) Note: Since H (G/B; Q) is generated by degree 2 elements, A (G) Q = Q for all G. For G = SL n, Sp n, H (G/B; Z) is also generated by degree 2 elements, and so A (G) = Z.

Strategy A (G) = H (G/B; Z)/(H 2 (G/B; Z)) A presentation for H (G/B; Z) was given by Borel. It is called Borel presentation, which is a quotient of a polynomial ring divided by some ideal. Ring structure is clear, but generators have little geometric meaning. H (G/B; Z) has another module basis consisting of by Schubert classes. Schubert classes come from subvarieties called Schubert varieties. Ring structure is complicated, so it is difficult to use Grothendieck s Theorem. Hence, what we will do are: easy Compute A (G) purely algebraically from Borel presentation. difficult Find Schubert varieties representing the generators. Main tool We use the divided difference operator given by Demazure and Berstein-Gelfand-Gelfand.

Borel presentation K(= G R ): maximal compact subgroup of G T (= T R ): maximal compact torus of K (=K B = (S 1 ) l ) BT : classifying space of T (=(CP ) l ) W : Weyl group of K (=N(T )/T ) {ω i } 1 i l : fundamental weights and H (BT ; Z) = Symh Z = Z[ω 1,..., ω l ] Inclusion K G induces a diffeomorphism K/T = G/B. the classifying map K/T ι BT of the T -bundle T K K/T induces the characteristic map ι : H (BT ; Z) H (K/T ; Z) Theorem (Borel(1953)) ι induces H (BT ; Q)/I W H (K/T ; Q), where I W = (H + (BT ; Q) W ) an ideal generated by the W -invariants of positive degrees.

Borel presentation Toda(1975) extended Borel s work to give H (K/T ; Z) by a quotient ring of a polynomial ring. Based on Toda s method, H (G/B; Z) = H (K/T ; Z) were explictly determined for all G. Theorem ι : H (BT ; Z) Z[γ di ] (ideal) H (K/T ; Z), γ di = 2d i.

Schubert presentation The Bruhat decomposition of G gives a cell decomposition G = w W G/B = w W BwB BwB/B. l(w): length of w W, w 0 W : the longest element X w = closure of Bw 0 wb/b( = C l(w0w) ): Schubert variety σ w = {the cohomology class corresponding to X w } H 2l(w) (G/B; Z): Schubert class corresponding to w {σ w } w W forms an additive basis for H (G/B; Z).

Comparison of the two presentations Hence we have two descriptions for H (K/T ; Z) = H (G/B; Z) = A (G/B) Borel presentation Schubert presentation elements polynomials Schubert classes geometry no algebraic cycles ring structure easy hard Demazure and BGG s divided difference operator bridges those two presentations.

Divided difference operator We can switch between Borel presentation and Schubert presentation. Theorem (B-G-G(1973), Demazure(1973)) For w W, they defined w : H (BT ; Z) H 2l(w) (BT ; Z). (characteristic map) c : H 2k (BT ; Z) H 2k (K/T ; Z) defined by c(f ) = w (f )σ w (Note: w (f ) Z) (Giambelli formula) ( σ w = c ( w 1w0 How to calculate? l(w)=k α + α W α (ω β ) = δ αβ α (fg) = α (f )g + s α (f ) α (g) )), + : the set of positive roots.

Borel presentation for H (E 6 /T ; Z) Theorem (Toda-Watanabe(1974)) H (E 6 /T ; Z) = Z[t 1, t 2,..., t 6, t 0, γ 3, γ 4 ] (ρ 1, ρ 2, ρ 3, ρ 4, ρ 5, ρ 6, ρ 8, ρ 9, ρ 12 ) ( t i = 2, γ i = 2i) ρ 1 =c 1 3t 0 ρ 2 = c 2 4t 2 0 ρ 3 =c 3 2γ 3 ρ 4 = c 4 + 2t 4 0 3γ 4 ρ 5 =c 5 3t 0 γ 4 + 2t 2 0 γ 3 ρ 6 = γ 3 2 + 2c 6 3t 2 0 γ 4 + t 6 0 ρ 8 =3γ 4 2 6tγ 3 γ 4 9t 2 0 c 6 + 15t 4 0 γ 4 6t 5 0 γ 3 t 8 0 ρ 9 =2c 6 γ 3 3t 3 0 c 6 ρ 12 =3c 2 6 2γ 4 3 + 6t 0 γ 3 γ 4 2 + 3t 2 0 c 6γ 4 + 5t 3 0 c 6γ 3 15t 4 0 γ 4 2 10t 6 0 c 6 + 19t 8 0 γ 4 6t 9 0 γ 3 2t 12 0

Correspondence Using the characteristic map, we can translate the generators {t 1, t 2,..., t 6, t, γ 3, γ 4 } in Borel presentation into Schubert classes. Borel Schubert Borel Schubert t 1 σ 1 + σ 2 t 6 σ 6 t 2 σ 1 + σ 2 σ 3 t σ 2 t 3 σ 2 + σ 3 σ 4 γ 3 σ 342 + 2σ 542 t 4 σ 4 σ 5 γ 4 σ 1342 + 2σ 3542 + σ 6542 t 5 σ 5 σ 6 Furthermore, we wish to take a single Schubert class for each generator. In this E 6 case, for example, we can take the following classes: σ 342 = γ 3 + 2t 3 σ 1342 = γ 4 2tγ 3 + 2t 4

A(E 6 ) By Grothendieck s Theorem, where A (G) = A (G/B)/(A 1 (G/B)) = H (G/B; Z)/(H 2 (G/B; Z)) = H (K/T ; Z)/(H 2 (K/T ; Z)), H (K/T ; Z) = Z[t 1,..., t l, t 0, γ d1,...]/(ρ j1,...) H 2 (K/T ; Z) = Z{t 1,..., t l, t 0 } Therefore to obtain A (G) from H (K/T ; Z), we simply put t i = 0, (0 i l) in Borel presentation. H (E 6 /T ; Z)/(t 1,..., t 6, t 0 ) = Z[γ 3, γ 4 ]/(2γ 3, 3γ 4, γ 2 3, γ 3 4) = Z[σ 542, σ 6542 ]/(2σ 542, 3σ 6542, σ 2 542, σ 3 6542)

Main Theorems p : G G/B: projection Theorem (K-Nakagawa) A(E 6 ) = Z[X 3, X 4 ]/(2X 3, 3X 4, X 2 3, X 3 4 ) X 3 = p (X w0s 5s 4s 2 ) = B(w 0 s 5 s 4 s 2 )B G X 4 = p (X w0s 6s 5s 4s 2 ) = B(w 0 s 6 s 5 s 4 s 2 )B G

A(E 7 ) Theorem (K-Nakagawa) A(E 7 ) = Z[X 3, X 4, X 5, X 9 ] /(2X 3, 3X 4, 2X 5, X 2 3, 2X 9, X 2 5, X 3 4, X 2 9 ) X 3 = p (X w0s 5s 4s 2 ) = B(w 0 s 5 s 4 s 2 )B G X 4 = p (X w0s 6s 5s 4s 2 ) = B(w 0 s 6 s 5 s 4 s 2 )B G X 5 = p (X w0s 7s 6s 5s 4s 2 ) = B(w 0 s 7 s 6 s 5 s 4 s 2 )B G X 9 = p (X w0s 6s 5s 4s 3s 7s 6s 5s 4s 2 ) = B(w 0 s 6 s 5 s 4 s 3 s 7 s 6 s 5 s 4 s 2 )B G

A(E 8 ) Proposition (K-Nakagawa) A(E 8 ) = Z[X 3, X 4, X 5, X 6, X 9, X 10, X 15 ] / 2X 3, 3X 4, 2X 5, 5X 6, 2X 9, X5 2 3X 10, X4 3, 2X 15, X9 2, 3X 10 2, X 3 8, X15 2 + X 10 3 + 2X 6 5 X i = p (γ i ) (i = 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15) Note: here X i may not be the pull-back of a single Schubert variety but a linear combination of them.

Case of G = Spin(n), G 2, F 4 Theorem (Marlin, Nakagawa) A(F 4 ) = Z[X 3, X 4 ]/(2X 3, 3X 4, X 2 3, X 3 4 ), where X 3 = B(w 0 s 1 s 2 s 3 )B, X 4 = B(w 0 s 1 s 2 s 3 s 4 )B. where X 3 = B(w 0 s 1 s 2 s 1 )B. A(G 2 ) = Z[X 3 ]/(2X 3, X 2 3 ), A(Spin(2n + 1)) = Z[X 3, X 5,..., X 2[ n+1 2 ] 1]/(2X i, X p i i ), where X i = B(w 0 s n i+1 s n 1 s n )B (1 i n) and p i = 2 [log 2 n i ]+1. A(Spin(2n)) = Z[X 3, X 5,..., X 2[ n 2 ] 1 ]/(2X i, X p i i ), where X 1 = B(w 0 s n )B, X i = B(w 0 s n i... s n 2 s n )B (2 i n 1)) and p i = 2 [log 2 n 1 i ]+1.

Future Work Determine which Schubert classes belong to the decomposable ideal. (equivalently, find indecomposable Schubert classes) Find a presentation of a given Schubert class σ w as a polynomial in a fixed set of ring generators. (Schubert polynomial of type G 2, F 4, E l (l = 6, 7, 8)) Replace B with any parabolic subgroup P in the above problems. (Note: there is a ring monomorphism H (G/P; Z) H (G/B; Z) described in terms of Schubert presentation)

Finding a set of ring generators How to determine which Schubert classes can be chosen as generators? This question can be formulated as follows. Definition R: graded commutative ring with R 0 = Z R : non-invertible elements of R decomposable ideal: (R R ) x R is indecomposable when x 0 R/(R R ) In our setting when R = H (G/B; Z): There is at most one ring generator in each degree H >2 (G/B; Z). If we find an indecomposable σ w H 2d (G/B; Z), then we take it as a generator γ d. Related question Which Schubert classes are indecomposable?

Example (finding indecomposables) H (F 4 /B; Z) has generators only in degrees 2, 6, and 8. H 2 (F 4 /B; Z) is spanned by σ w, where W = [1], [2], [3], [4], the length one elements in the Weyl group. Of course they are indecomposable. Out of 16(= dim H 6 (F 4 /B; Z)), the indecomposables are: W = [1, 2, 3], [1, 3, 2], [2, 1, 3], [2, 3, 2], [3, 2, 1], [3, 2, 3] Out of 25(= dim H 8 (F 4 /B; Z)), the indecomposables are: W =[1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 2], [1, 2, 4, 3], [1, 3, 2, 3], [1, 3, 2, 4], [1, 4, 3, 2] [2, 1, 3, 4], [2, 1, 4, 3], [2, 3, 2, 1], [2, 3, 2, 4], [2, 4, 3, 2] [3, 2, 1, 3], [3, 2, 1, 4], [3, 2, 3, 4] [4, 3, 2, 1], [4, 3, 2, 3] Note: there are more than one way to express an element of Weyl group by the products of the simple reflections.

Thank you for listening