Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Prof. A.H. Techet Fall 2004

Similar documents
/01/04: Morrison s Equation SPRING 2004 A. H. TECHET

13.42 LECTURE 13: FLUID FORCES ON BODIES. Using a two dimensional cylinder within a two-dimensional flow we can demonstrate some of the principles

OFFSHORE HYDROMECHANICS OE 4620-d

1. Froude Krylov Excitation Force

Coupled Heave-Pitch Motions and Froude Krylov Excitation Forces

OpenFOAM simulations of irregular waves and free surface effects around a monopile offshore wind turbine

Object Impact on the Free Surface and Added Mass Effect Laboratory Fall 2005 Prof. A. Techet

13.42 LECTURE 2: REVIEW OF LINEAR WAVES

FLUID MECHANICS. Chapter 9 Flow over Immersed Bodies

Froude Krylov Excitation Force

Lecture-4. Flow Past Immersed Bodies

Hydrodynamic Forces on Floating Bodies

REE Internal Fluid Flow Sheet 2 - Solution Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics


Figure 3: Problem 7. (a) 0.9 m (b) 1.8 m (c) 2.7 m (d) 3.6 m

Interphase Transport in Isothermal Systems

Chapter 12. Recall that when a spring is stretched a distance x, it will pull back with a force given by: F = -kx

BAE 820 Physical Principles of Environmental Systems

Lecture 1: Introduction to Linear and Non-Linear Waves

d v 2 v = d v d t i n where "in" and "rot" denote the inertial (absolute) and rotating frames. Equation of motion F =

V (r,t) = i ˆ u( x, y,z,t) + ˆ j v( x, y,z,t) + k ˆ w( x, y, z,t)

Principles of Convection

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow

Models of ocean circulation are all based on the equations of motion.

Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture 19. Exact (nonlinear) governing equations for surface gravity waves assuming potential theory

1 POTENTIAL FLOW THEORY Formulation of the seakeeping problem

Day 24: Flow around objects

Lab Reports Due on Monday, 11/24/2014

OE4625 Dredge Pumps and Slurry Transport. Vaclav Matousek October 13, 2004

Design and Modeling of Fluid Power Systems ME 597/ABE Lecture 7

Wave Hydro Dynamics Prof. V. Sundar Department of Ocean Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Chapter 10. Solids and Fluids

Bluff Body, Viscous Flow Characteristics ( Immersed Bodies)

VERTICAL SCALES AND SHEAR STRESSES IN WAVE BOUNDARY LAYERS OVER MOVABLE BEDS. Peter Nielsen & Paul A Guard

2.6 Oseen s improvement for slow flow past a cylinder

Lecture 7 Boundary Layer

AP Physics Laboratory #6.1: Analyzing Terminal Velocity Using an Interesting Version of Atwood s Machine

Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER S THESIS

Lesson 6 Review of fundamentals: Fluid flow

CLASS SCHEDULE 2013 FALL

Resistance in Unsteady Flow Search for a Model

Estimation of State Noise for the Ensemble Kalman filter algorithm for 2D shallow water equations.

Review of Fundamental Equations Supplementary notes on Section 1.2 and 1.3

Friction Factors and Drag Coefficients

15. Physics of Sediment Transport William Wilcock

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Chapter 7: Natural Convection

FLUID MECHANICS PROF. DR. METİN GÜNER COMPILER

2 Internal Fluid Flow

Basic Fluid Mechanics

Module 9: Packed beds Lecture 29: Drag, particles settling. Flow through a packed bed of solids. Drag. Criteria of settling.

Chapter 1: Basic Concepts

1. Fluid Dynamics Around Airfoils

ESCI 485 Air/Sea Interaction Lesson 1 Stresses and Fluxes Dr. DeCaria

First Year Physics: Prelims CP1. Classical Mechanics: Prof. Neville Harnew. Problem Set III : Projectiles, rocket motion and motion in E & B fields

Prof. Scalo Prof. Vlachos Prof. Ardekani Prof. Dabiri 08:30 09:20 A.M 10:30 11:20 A.M. 1:30 2:20 P.M. 3:30 4:20 P.M.

What we know about Fluid Mechanics. What we know about Fluid Mechanics

Bottom friction effects on linear wave propagation

Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture 19. Exact (nonlinear) governing equations for surface gravity waves assuming potential theory

TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, DIVISION OF PHYSICS 13. STOKES METHOD

Fluid Mechanics. Spring 2009

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Classification of offshore structures

CHAPTER 4 BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW APPLICATION TO EXTERNAL FLOW

Fluid Mechanics. Chapter 9 Surface Resistance. Dr. Amer Khalil Ababneh

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Waves in Fluids

Modelling of dispersed, multicomponent, multiphase flows in resource industries. Section 3: Examples of analyses conducted for Newtonian fluids

Lecture 4 1/28/2019. CM3120 Transport/Unit Operations 2

5 SIMILITUDE. 5.1 Use of Nondimensional Groups

Figure 1: Surface waves

Chapter -5(Section-1) Friction in Solids and Liquids

FE Fluids Review March 23, 2012 Steve Burian (Civil & Environmental Engineering)

Topics in Fluid Dynamics: Classical physics and recent mathematics

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Ideal Flow Theory & Basic Aerodynamics

CHAPTER 12 OSCILLATORY MOTION

High Speed Aerodynamics. Copyright 2009 Narayanan Komerath

Fluid Mechanics Prof. T. I. Eldho Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department. Fluid Mechanics. Chapter 1. General Introduction

PIPE FLOWS: LECTURE /04/2017. Yesterday, for the example problem Δp = f(v, ρ, μ, L, D) We came up with the non dimensional relation

INSTRUCTOR: PM DR MAZLAN ABDUL WAHID

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN

HEAT TRANSFER BY CONVECTION. Dr. Şaziye Balku 1

Introduction to Marine Hydrodynamics

58:160 Intermediate Fluid Mechanics Bluff Body Professor Fred Stern Fall 2014

BLUFF-BODY AERODYNAMICS

Chapter 4 Water Waves

Convection Heat Transfer. Introduction

Fluid Mechanics. du dy

Part A: 1 pts each, 10 pts total, no partial credit.

28. Pendulum phase portrait Draw the phase portrait for the pendulum (supported by an inextensible rod)

21 Rotating flows. Lecture 21 Spring J Nonlinear Dynamics II: Continuum Systems The Taylor-Proudman theorem

Class #4. Retarding forces. Worked Problems

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS WAVES IN THE OCEANS. Wolfgang Fennel Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde (IOW) an der Universität Rostock,Germany

Module 6: Free Convections Lecture 26: Evaluation of Nusselt Number. The Lecture Contains: Heat transfer coefficient. Objectives_template

Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 16, 1997 WIT Press, ISSN X

PHYSICAL MECHANISM OF CONVECTION

FE Exam Fluids Review October 23, Important Concepts

OPEN CHANNEL FLOW. One-dimensional - neglect vertical and lateral variations in velocity. In other words, Q v = (1) A. Figure 1. One-dimensional Flow

Fluid Mechanics II Viscosity and shear stresses

Chapter 9 Flow over Immersed Bodies

Transcription:

13.01 ydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Prof. A.. Techet Fall 004 Morrison s Equation 1. General form of Morrison s Equation Flow past a circular cylinder is a canonical problem in ocean engineering. For a purely inviscid, steady flow we know that the force on any body is zero ( Allembert s paradox). For unsteady inviscid flow this is no longer the case and added mass effects must be considered. Of course in the real world, viscosity plays a large role and we must consider, in addition to added mass forces, viscous drag forces resulting from separation and boundary layer friction. Following on Tuesday s lecture, the resulting force on a body in an unsteady viscous flow can be determined using Morrison s Equation, which is a combination of an inertial term and a drag term. The force in the x-direction on a body in unsteady flow with velocity U(t) is 1 Fx() t = () t = ρcm U + ρcdau U (1.1) In order to obtain rough estimates of the magnitude of the force of a body, it is advantageous to use Morrison s equation with constant coefficients. Supposing we want to find the estimates of the wave forces on a fixed structure, then the procedure would be as follows: 1. Select an appropriate wave theory (linear waves, or other higher order if necessary).. Select the appropriate C M and C based on Reynolds number, and other factors (see table below). 3. Apply Morrison s Equation version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-1- 003, 004, aht

Wave Theory C d C m Comments Reference Linear Theory 1.0 0.95 Mean values for ocean wave data on 13-4in cylinders Wiegel, et al (1957) 1.0-1.4.0 Recommended design values based on statistical analysis of Agerschou and Edens (1965) published data Stokes 3 rd order 1.34 1.46 Mean Values for oscillatory flow for -3in cylinders Keulegan and Carpenter (1958) Stokes 5 th order 0.8-1.0.0 Recommended values based on statistical analysis of published data Agerschou and Edens (1965) We can see from the above table that for linear waves the recommended values for drag and mass coefficients are 1.0-1.4 and.0, respectively. The range of drag coefficients allows us to account for roughness and Reynolds number effects. These values are for rough estimates. In reality these coefficients vary widely with the various flow parameters and with time. Bretschneider showed that the values of C and C M can even vary over one wave cycle. Even if we ignore the time dependence of these coefficients we must account for the influence of other parameters. Reynolds number and roughness effects: For smooth cylinders at Reynolds numbers around 10 5, laminar flow transitions to turbulent flow, and there is a dip in C as a function of Re. For larger Reynolds numbers the separation point remains essentially constant and thus so does the drag coefficient. In this range C is Reynolds number independent. Roughness causes the change from laminar to turbulent flow at a lower Reynolds number and increases the friction and causes a larger C. The mass coefficient is influenced by the changes in the boundary layer and is thus also affected Reynolds number and roughness. version 3.0 updated 10/5/004 -- 003, 004, aht

z u(z,t) L o Figure 1. Cylinder in non-uniform inflow Suppose a vertical cylinder is subject to a current with a horizontal velocity changing both in time and vertically in the z-direction: uzt. (,) The approach in practice is to evaluate, using Morrison s formula, the force acting on a small section of the cylinder (eq. 1.) at each depth and then integrate to get the total force (eq. 1.3). π df(,) zt = CMρ d uztdz (,) + C d ρuzt (,) uzt (,) dz (1.) 4 1 z= L F() t = df( z,) t (1.3) z= 0 The moment on the structure around the origin (point 0) is found by integrating the height z times df. M () t = z df( z,) t (1.4) 0 L There are several limitations to these integrals. First we are limited to assume that each section does not influence the adjacent sections flow. This assumption becomes version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-3- 003, 004, aht

questionable in the case of a cross flow that forces direct interference between the flow of neighboring sections. The second assumption is that the cylinder is not piercing the free surface because in this case the water splashing must be taken into account. In the absence of experimental data we use Morrison s equation as a first estimate in this class, but in reality we should attempt a correction for the surface piercing phenomena.. Morrison s Equation when both the body and fluid are moving Assume that a vertical cylinder is moving with velocity, u(t), within a fluid with velocity, v(t), both velocities in the horizontal direction and uniform in space, then we can write Morrison s equation as follows: π π 1 M M [ ] F( t) = ρc d lv ( t) ρ C 1 d hu ( t) + C ρdl v( t) u( t) v( t) u( t) (.1) 4 4 where d is the cylinder diameter and l the cylinder height. It is good to note that this equation does not account for the inertial force due to the mass of the cylinder as required by Newton s law. For example if the cylinder was subject to an inflow we could set Ft () = mat (), where F(t) is found using equation 3.1, m is the mass of the cylinder, and a(t) is the acceleration. 3. Forces on an Inclined Cylinder Suppose that a cylinder of diameter, d, and large length, l, is at an angle within an unsteady inflow, u(t), and we would like to use Morrison s equation. It has been suggested that in such cases of slender objects (large l/d) that we can use the following approach: first decompose the inflow velocity into two components U n and U t, where U n is the velocity normal to the cylinder and U t is the component tangential to the cylinder; then we can use the following expressions: version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-4- 003, 004, aht

and π 1 n = Mρ n + ρ n n F C d U C du U 4 (3.1) 1 Ft = Cf ρπdut Ut (3.) to determine the normal and tangential forces per unit length. The mass and drag coefficients are found using the diameter of the cylinder and the normal velocity as in the general (non-inclined) case. The frictional coefficient, C f, is used in the tangential case instead of the drag coefficient since the drag results from the flow along (tangential) to the cylinder. In the three-dimensional case where we have a vertical cylinder subject to a velocity vector (u, v, w) then we must decompose this velocity into components normal and tangential to the cylinder. The convention is to take the z-axis parallel with the cylinder axis (centerline) so that the w component is the tangential component of velocity: U u v n = + and Ut = w (3.3) The velocity components (u, v, w) used in eq. (3.3) are taken in the coordinate system with z- axis parallel to cylinder axis. Equations (3.1) and (3.) can then be used to determine the normal and tangential force components. Finally the resultant force in a global coordinate system (say with z-axis perpendicular to the free surface) can be determined using simple trigonometry. These equations have some limitations on as incline angle, as experiments have shown that these expressions are valid up to incline angles of about 60º. version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-5- 003, 004, aht

4. Relative Importance of Inertial versus rag Force Terms For an incoming wave train with elevation η ( x, t) cos( kx ωt) h = we can determine the relative magnitude of the integrated inertial and drag force terms in Morrison s equation. Understanding the imum forces and also when inertial effects dominate over viscous drag, or vice versa, is important in designing offshore structures. The horizontal velocity and acceleration under the wave at the centerline (x=0) of the cylinder are hω cosh k z ux ( = 0, zt, ) = cos( ωt) (3.4) sinhk u cosh k z (0, zt, ) = aω sin t t sinh k ( ω ) (3.5) Consider the force caused on a vertical cylinder in water depth,, by a linear wave with wavelength,, and height, h, given in the form Ft () = F() t + F() t (3.6) I where F I (t) is the inertial force term and F (t) is the viscous drag force term. The inertial force F I is dependent on the mass coefficient and can be determined by integrating the force acting over the height of the structure. For a structure fixed to the seafloor the inertial force (in the x-direction) due to waves impinging on a circular cylinder is π cosh h k z FI () t C d sin t dz 4 sinh 0 ρ ω = ( ω ). (3.7) M version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-6- 003, 004, aht

After integrating eq. (4.4) the resultant inertial force is π h FI() t = ρ CM d ω sin( ωt). (3.8) 4 k Similarly we can find the drag force F (t) in a similar fashion 0 1 h cosh k z F() t = ρcd ω cos ( ωt) cos( ωt) dz (3.9) 4 sinh sinh k + 1 h ω 4 F() t = ρ Cd cos ( ωt) cos( ωt) (3.10) 4 k sinh ( k) The imum values of these two force components are useful when considering design loads on a structure. One way to determine the imum is to plot equations (3.8) and (3.10), or simply to look generally at the equations. The imum inertial force using the result in eq. (3.8) is π h FI C d 4 k = Mρ ω, (3.11) and the imum drag force from eq. (4.7) is F sinh k + 1 h 4 4 k sinh = ρcd dω. (3.1) ( k) version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-7- 003, 004, aht

To compare the effects of inertial versus drag components we can take the ratio F I to F. F C h sinh k 1 = + FI C 4 sinh M d k (3.13) Substituting the typical values for drag and mass coefficients, 1.0 and.0, respectively, allows us to determine how the imum drag force compares to the imum inertial force, i.e. F > F when I ( π ) ( π ) h 4sinh 4sinh > π = π d sinh k + k sinh 4 + 4π (3.14) k If is large (deep water) then sinh e k and the deep water asymptote for h/d, such that F > F, is I h d ( 4π ) e 4π 4π (3.15) ( 4π ) e + 4π If is small (very shallow water) then sinh k and the shallow water asymptote for h/d, such that F > F, is I h d ( π ) 4 π = ( π) (3.16) 4π + 4π We could also consider the imum drag and inertial force (force/length) terms at a specific depth, z, below the free surface: version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-8- 003, 004, aht

cosh k z F ( z) C d 4 sinh 1 h = ρ ω (3.17) π h cosh k z FI z = ρc M d ω (3.18) 4 sinh The ratio of these two components is F z C cosh k z h =. (3.19) F z πc d sinh k I M It is evident from equation (3.17) that the drag force is most significant nearest to the surface and it decreases with increasing depth. Take as an example, the case of deep water waves with typical values for C d and C m (1.0 and.0 respectively), the ratio of drag and inertial forces as a function of depth are F z 1 h e kz = (3.0) F z π d I The imum total force integrated over the height of the cylinder can be determined using equations (3.8) and (3.10). Thus total force as a function of time is π h Ft () = ρcm d ω sin( ωt) 4 k sinh ( k ) k + 1 h ω 4 + ρ Cd cos ωt ωt 4 k sinh ( k) cos (3.1) ( ω ) ( ω ) ( ω ) Ft () = F sin t + F cos t cos t (3.) Io o version 3.0 updated 10/5/004-9- 003, 004, aht