Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS

Similar documents
Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc.

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: Cascade Thornapple River Assoc. Project: Water Analysis Lab Order:

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013.

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

Optimizing Standard Preparation

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

Measuring Environmental Volatile Organic Compounds by U.S. EPA Method 8260B with Headspace Trap GC/MS

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1

Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs

CALA Directory of Laboratories

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

Electronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical Model of Analyte Uptake by Permeation Passive Samplers

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete

Target Compound Results Summary

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

In-Tube Extraction Sample Preparation for Gas Chromatography

METHOD 5021 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN SOILS AND OTHER SOLID MATRICES USING EQUILIBRIUM HEADSPACE ANALYSIS

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Reduced VOC Sample Analysis Times Using a New Dual Purge-and-Trap System

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.

Determination of Hydrocarbon Components in Petroleum Naphthas

Volatile Organic Compounds in Water PBM

Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Discovering the Scent of Celery: HS-SPME, GC-TOFMS, and Retention Indices for the Characterization of Volatiles

Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals (USP<467>) with Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus and HS-10 Headspace Sampler

Associates. Project No.: October 25, 2017

Application Note 116 Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

Organochlorine Pesticides by GCxGC-ECD

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

Analysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME

Techniques for Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge-and-Trap/GC/MS Application

Thermal Desorption Technical Support

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 1 of 5

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Purgeable Organic Compounds (VOC s) in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air

Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

Analysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System

CALA Directory of Laboratories

METHOD MEASUREMENT OF PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN WATER BY CAPILLARY COLUMN GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY. Revision 4.

ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN WATER BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY USING NITROGEN PURGE GAS

Sensitive Detection of 2-MIB and Geosmin in Drinking Water

Methods of Analysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners Using an Application-Specific Capillary GC Column

Readiness thru Health

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

USP <467> Headspace Residual Solvent Assay with a HT3 Headspace Instrument

Identifying Disinfection Byproducts in Treated Water

R.E.A.C.T. Roxbury Environmental Action CoaliTion P.O. Box 244 Ledgewood, N.J Website:

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

NELAC PT for Accreditation Fields of Proficiency Testing with PTRLs Drinking Water Effective: November 03, 2017

Non-Potable Water A2LA Certificate

1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP), gas chromatography, microextraction

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley

Chlorinated Compounds in Hydrocarbon Streams Using a Halogen Specific Detector (XSD)

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

Enhanced Preconcentrator for the Analysis of Vapor Phase Volatile Organic Compounds

C146-E209. Headspace Samplers. HS-20 Series

Table 1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Summary Table

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident

Luminescence transitions. Fluorescence spectroscopy

Method 1624 Revision C Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GCMS

Transcription:

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS LECO Corporation; Saint Joseph, Michigan USA Key Words: GC-TOFMS, VOC's, Environmental 1. Introduction Disinfection by-products are formed in drinking water due to a reaction of natural organic matter with chlorine, chloramines, and ozone; which are used to kill bacteria. In addition to trihalomethanes (e.g. chloroform, bromoform, etc.) and haloacetic acids, cyanogen chloride and bromide can be formed through disinfection. Cyanogen chloride (CNCl) is metabolized to cyanide in the body and the World Health Organization has issued a guideline of 70 ppb of total cyanogenic compounds in drinking water. Methods of analysis for CNCl in drinking water include purge-and-trap (P&T) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), static headspace GC-electron capture detector (ECD), and micro liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) GC-ECD. P&T GC-MS (EPA Method 524.2), has a quantification limit of 0.3 ppb for CNCl. The method is sensitive and reproducible because of the relatively large sample size (5 ml), and the exhaustive sampling approach of P&T. Static headspace is not as sensitive or precise as P&T, mainly because CNCl is so water-soluble. The micro LLE approach (EPA Method 551.1) uses methyl t-butyl ether and a salting out extraction to improve recovery for the hydrophilic CNCl, but the method is still not as sensitive as P&T. An alternate approach to the methods above is solid phase microextraction (SPME). A syringe-type coated fiber is either immersed in an aqueous sample, or suspended in the headspace above the sample to collect volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Subsequently, the fiber is desorbed in a hot injector of a GC. This note describes preliminary method development work on SPME of CNCl in drinking water, with fast GC Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (TOFMS) to measure CNCl and VOCs in Las Vegas, Nevada drinking water. 2. Experimental Conditions Drinking Water Las Vegas uses Lake Mead, formed by the damming of the Colorado River, as its water source. Chlorination is the current form of disinfection. Standards CNCl was obtained from Protocol Analytical Supplies, Inc. Cyanogen bromide was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company. All other VOCs were from Restek Corporation. A mixed standard containing all compounds used in this work was prepared in methanol, from the stock listed above. Working solutions of this standard were spiked into water to prepare aqueous samples for testing and calibration purposes. SPME 2 ml of water was placed into a 4 ml vial. A micro stirring bar was placed into the vial and a holed cap with a PTFElined silicone septum was used to seal the vial. Stirring was started and a Carboxen/PDMS fiber from a manual SPME fiber holder (Supelco) was inserted into the headspace of the vial. After exactly 4 minutes, the fiber was retracted and removed from the vial. VOCs were desorbed from the fiber via a splitless injector at 250 C. A 0.75 mm ID SPME injection sleeve (Supelco) was the liner for the injector. The injector was purged after 15 seconds. GC Parameters: Agilent 6890N Column: 20 m x 0.25 mm x 0.71 µm Rtx-TNT (Restek) Carrier: Helium at 5 ml/minute, constant flow Injection: SPME desorption Oven Program: -40 C (0.25 minute), 120 /minute to 80, 80 /minute to 220 Total Run Time: 3 minutes Mass Spectrometer: LECO Pegasus III GC-TOFMS Ionization: Electron ionization at 70eV Source Temperature: 180 C Stored Mass Range: 47 to 350 u Acquisition Rate: 40 spectra/second Data Processing LECO ChromaTOF software with automatic Peak Find and Deconvolution. 3. Results SPME sampling time was kept as short as possible while trying to maximize response for CNCl. Figure 1 shows that the maximum response for CNCl occurred at about 4 minutes, so this was set as the SPME sampling time.

Delivering the Right Results Normalized peak area 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 Sample time (min) 4 min. this method Chloromethane Cyanogen chloride Cyanogen bromide Chloroform Toluene Bromoform Figure 1. SPME headspace sampling efficiencies for a group of volatile organic compounds. A high GC column flow rate of 5 ml/minute was used for two reasons. The first was to provide high flow through the inlet to speed desorption of the VOCs from the SPME fiber. The other reason was to chromatograph the VOCs as quickly as possible, knowing that the peak find and deconvolution algorithms available with TOFMS would provide the differentiation necessary for qualitative and quantitative measurements. Retention times and elution orders for the VOCs are illustrated in Table 1 and Figure 2. Note that many of the peak widths for the VOCs are less than one second wide. Narrow peak widths and spectral deconvolution explain the reason for acquiring MS data at a high 40 spectra/second rate. Table 1. Retention times in seconds for a standard of VOCs sampled from water using SPME. Peak# Compound RT (sec.) 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 33.36 2 Chloromethane 38.65 3 Cyanogen chloride 44.98 4 Bromomethane 50.82 5 Chloroethane 53.55 6 Trichlorofluoromethane 60.25 7 Cyanogen bromide 63.90 8 1,1-Dichloroethene 65.05 9 Methylene chloride 66.90 10 trans-1,2-dichloroethene 71.40 11 1,1-Dichloroethane 72.87 12 cis-1,2-dichloroethene 76.82 13 Bromochloromethane 77.82 14 2,2-Dichloropropane 77.90 15 Chloroform 78.20 16 1,2-Dichloroethane 81.82 17 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 82.10 18 1,1-Dichloropropene 83.42 19 Benzene 84.17 20 Carbon tetrachloride 84.52 21 1,2-Dichloropropane 88.35 22 Dibromomethane 88.55 23 Trichloroethene 88.90 24 Bromodichloromethane 89.32 25 cis-1,3-dichloropropene 93.42 26 trans-1,3-dichloropropene 96.25 27 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 97.27 28 Toluene 97.77 29 1,3-Dichloropropane 98.90 30 Chlorodibromomethane 100.95 31 1,2-Dibromoethane 102.42 32 Tetrachloroethene 103.77 33 Chlorobenzene 108.25 34 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 108.30 35 Ethylbenzene 110.17 36 m-xylene 111.22 37 p-xylene 111.22 38 Bromoform 113.07 39 Styrene 113.90 40 o-xylene 114.47 41 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 115.55 42 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 116.55 43 Isopropylbenzene 118.45 44 Bromobenzene 119.72 45 n-propylbenzene 122.28 46 2-Chlorotoluene 122.36 47 4-Chlorotoluene 122.92 48 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 124.05 49 tert-butylbenzene 127.45 50 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 127.55 51 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 129.35 52 sec-butylbenzene 129.77 53 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 130.02 54 p-isopropyltoluene 131.27 55 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 133.20 56 n-butylbenzene 135.27 57 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 138.32 58 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 150.97 59 Naphthalene 152.25 60 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 155.35 61 Hexachlorobutadiene 155.65

4 5 15 12 2 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 1 3 7 19 18 17 16 20 Fluorobenzene 23 24 22 25 21 28 26 27 55 2-Bromo- 1-chloropropane 56 29 30 31 32 57 33 34 58 59 60 35 36 37 39 38 40 43 41 44 42 Figure 2. Chromatogram of VOCs using fast TOFMS (40 spectra/second) after sampling of spiked water with SPME. Total analysis time is less than 3 minutes. Diagnostic extracted ions are plotted for each VOC. Refer to Peak# in Table 1 for compound identifications. 61 45 46 47 48 49 50 52 51 53 54

Internal standard calibration curves (using either fluorobenzene or bromochloropropane) were developed for most of the VOCs, ranging from 0.2 to 40 ppb. The calibration curve for CNCl is shown in Figure 3. Delivering the Right Results 0.2 to 10 ppb Extended Range 10 to 40 ppb Figure 5. Lower and extended range calibration curves for chloroform. The top curve from 0.2 to 10 ppb is built using the 83 ion, while the bottom curve (10 to 40 ppb) uses the less intense ion 87 due to detector saturation for 83 in this range. Figure 3. TOFMS calibration curve from 0.2 to 40 ppb for cyanogen chloride. Because the TOFMS detector voltage was set relatively high for poorly detected cyano compounds, the detector saturated on some VOC base peak ions at higher concentrations (e.g. chloroform, bromodichloromethane). Since these same ions are typically used for quantification, the calibration curves for these compounds had a limited range. Fortunately, ChromaTOF provides an elegant solution to this problem through the use of Extended Range Calibration. In Extended Range Calibration, a less intense mass is used for quantification in the higher range. Figure 4 indicates how the entries are made in the Calibration Table. The resulting calibration curves for chloroform are plotted in Figure 5. The beauty of Extended Range Calibration is that range selection is automatic for unknown analysis. No operator intervention is necessary. A summary of Las Vegas drinking water quantification results is shown in Table 2. Fourteen replicate water samples were drawn during a constant flushing of the tap. Cyanogen chloride was detected in all of the samples. Total trihalomethanes (THMs) averaged around 45 ppb. The EPA limit for THMs is 100 ppb. Table 2. Quantification of VOCs in Las Vegas drinking water by SPME GC-TOFMS. Compound ppb RSD % Cyanogen chloride 2.8 26 Cyanogen bromide ND ND Chloroform 16 17 Bromodichloromethane 16 8 Dibromochloromethane 12 10 Bromoform 1.1 11 RSD% is the relative standard deviation for fourteen analyses. ND is not detected. Range 1 Base Peak Quant Masses Range 2 Less Intense Quant Masses Estimated detection limits (EDLs) in drinking water for select compounds measured using the SPME GC- TOFMS method are shown in Table 3. These were calculated by extrapolation of the 0.2 ppb standard, based on the quantification mass and a signal-tonoise of 3 as the detection limit. Obviously the method is very sensitive, capable of measuring many VOCs in the ppt range. CNCl has an excellent detection limit also. Figure 4. Extended range calibration for chloroform and bromodichloromethane. In the top table, the most intense ions (83) are used for the lower level curve (up to 10 ppb). The bottom table shows the switch to less intense ions (87 and 129) for levels from 10 to 40 ppb because the detector saturates when the most intense ion is used in this range.

Table 3. Estimated detection limits for select VOCs in drinking water using SPME GC-TOFMS. Compound Mass EDL (ppb) Cyanogen chloride 61 0.03 Cyanogen bromide 105 0.1 Chloroform 83 0.0003 Bromodichloromethane 83 0.0005 Dibromochloromethane 129 0.001 Bromoform 173 0.002 5. References World Health Organization, Water and Sanitation, Guidelines for drinking water quality. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/gdwq/ch emicals/cyanogenchloridefull.htm#general B. Cancho, F. Ventura, M.T. Galceran, Simultaneous determination of cyanogen chloride and cyanogen bromide in treated water at sub-µg/l levels by a new GC-ECD method, J. Chromatogr. A 897 (2000) 307-315. Method Development Observations Direct aqueous sampling of tap water using SPME resulted in degradation of the fiber, and even though rinsing in a methanol/water solution could restore fiber performance, headspace sampling is preferred for VOCs. Some carryover occurs with the Carboxen/PDMS fiber when it is desorbed at 250 C for 15 seconds. To decrease carryover, higher desorption temperatures are preferred (320 C maximum) versus increased desorption time. Although it was not done in this work, since all sampling and analysis was performed almost simultaneously, free chlorine should be quenched to halt production of disinfection byproducts during sample storage and SPME. Cryogenic oven cooling during SPME desorption is timeconsuming, but necessary to refocus low boiling volatiles on the GC column. A thicker film GC column might permit a higher oven start temperature. 4. Conclusions SPME is a simple, inexpensive, and sensitive method for sampling cyanogen chloride and other volatiles in drinking water. 61 VOCs were chromatographed in less than 3 minutes using a fast GC method. The high acquisition rate of TOFMS defines peaks less than 1 second wide, and enables spectral deconvolution of coeluting peaks. Extended Range Calibration enabled hands-off measurement for compounds whose typical quantification ions saturated the MS detector. LECO Corporation 3000 Lakeview Avenue St. Joseph, MI 49085 Phone: 800-292-6141 Fax: 269-982-8977 info@leco.com www.leco.com ISO-9001:2000 No. FM 24045 LECO is a registered trademark of LECO Corporation. Form No. 203-821-219 8/08-REV1 2008 LECO Corporation