Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples

Similar documents
arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 12 Nov 2002

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Poisson modules and generalized geometry

Generalized Contact Structures

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Contact manifolds and generalized complex structures

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations

HAMILTONIAN ACTIONS IN GENERALIZED COMPLEX GEOMETRY

Generalized complex geometry

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

De Lecomte Roger à Monge Ampère From Lecomte Roger to Monge Ampère

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath. XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

The Calabi Conjecture

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

BRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]).

LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP

Mirror Symmetry: Introduction to the B Model

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

LECTURE 3 MATH 261A. Office hours are now settled to be after class on Thursdays from 12 : 30 2 in Evans 815, or still by appointment.

Reduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle

BACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Hamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections

Tesi di Laurea Magistrale in Matematica presentata da. Claudia Dennetta. Symplectic Geometry. Il Relatore. Prof. Massimiliano Pontecorvo

Master of Science in Advanced Mathematics and Mathematical Engineering

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

Hyper-Kähler geometry and semi-geostrophic theory

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

Vector fields in the presence of a contact structure

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

NOTES ON THE CHARACTERISTIC VARIETY

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

Moduli space of special Lagrangians in almost Kahler spaces

Dierential geometry for Physicists

JACOBI STRUCTURES AND DIFFERENTIAL FORMS ON CONTACT QUOTIENTS

arxiv: v2 [math.sg] 8 Mar 2018

SECOND-ORDER TYPE-CHANGING EVOLUTION EQUATIONS WITH FIRST-ORDER INTERMEDIATE EQUATIONS

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

SUBTANGENT-LIKE STATISTICAL MANIFOLDS. 1. Introduction

RESEARCH STATEMENT YUHAO HU

WARPED PRODUCTS PETER PETERSEN

Categorification of shifted symplectic geometry using perverse sheaves

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Doubled Aspects of Vaisman Algebroid and Gauge Symmetry in Double Field Theory arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 15 Jan 2019

Symplectic Geometry versus Riemannian Geometry

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

Mathematical methods of classical mechanics

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

Shifted Symplectic Derived Algebraic Geometry and generalizations of Donaldson Thomas Theory

Monge-Ampère Structures and the Geometry of Incompressible Flows

The only global contact transformations of order two or more are point transformations

Geometric characterization and classification of Bäcklund transformations of sine-gordon type

Geometria Simplettica e metriche Hermitiane speciali

Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry

Master Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry Lecture notes allowed

Solutions to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation as Lagrangian submanifolds

THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009

MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus

Adiabatic limits of co-associative Kovalev-Lefschetz fibrations

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Stable generalized complex structures

An integral lift of contact homology

SUBMANIFOLDS OF GENERALIZED COMPLEX MANIFOLDS. Oren Ben-Bassat and Mitya Boyarchenko

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

Singularities of affine fibrations in the regularity theory of Fourier integral operators

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

Dirac structures. Henrique Bursztyn, IMPA. Geometry, mechanics and dynamics: the legacy of J. Marsden Fields Institute, July 2012

On the Virtual Fundamental Class

Contact Geometry of the Visual Cortex

MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATIONS VIEWED FROM CONTACT GEOMETRY

INTEGRATION OF TWISTED POISSON STRUCTURES ALBERTO S. CATTANEO AND PING XU

Contact pairs (bicontact manifolds)

Constant symplectic 2-groupoids

Complex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

NOTES ON FORMAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND JET BUNDLES

Some aspects of the Geodesic flow

E 0 0 F [E] + [F ] = 3. Chern-Weil Theory How can you tell if idempotents over X are similar?

Transcription:

Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples Vladimir Rubtsov, ITEP,Moscow and LAREMA, Université d Angers Workshop "Geometry and Fluids" Clay Mathematical Institute, Oxford University UK, April 07, 2014

Plan Introduction Effective forms and Monge-Ampère operators Symplectic Transformations of MAO Solutions of symplectic MAE Monge-Ampère and Geometric Structures Classification of SMAE on R 2 SMAE in 3D

Bibliography: Figure: Cambridge University Press, 2007

Basic object Figure: Monge and Ampère A 2 f q 2 1 + 2B 2 f q 1 q 2 + C 2 f q 2 2 + D ( 2 f q 2 1 2 f q 2 2 f ( ) 2) + E = 0 q 1 q 2

Global Solutions: Monge Figure: sphere and pseudosphere An example: curvature of a surface in R 3 u q1 q 1 u q2 q 2 u 2 q 1 q 2 (1+u 2 q 1 + u 2 q 2 ) 2 = K(u)

Main idea Let F : R n (i)r n be a vector-function and its graph is a subspace in T (R n ) = R n (i)r n.

Main idea Let F : R n (i)r n be a vector-function and its graph is a subspace in T (R n ) = R n (i)r n. The tangent space to the graph at the point (x,f(x)) is the graph of (df) x - the differential of F at the point x.

Main idea Let F : R n (i)r n be a vector-function and its graph is a subspace in T (R n ) = R n (i)r n. The tangent space to the graph at the point (x,f(x)) is the graph of (df) x - the differential of F at the point x. This graph is a Lagrangian subspace in T (R n ) iff (df) x is a symmetric endomorphism. The matrix F i x j is symmetric x iff the differential form i F idx i Λ 1 (R n ) is closed or, equivalently, exact: F i = f x i = F = f.

Main idea Let F : R n (i)r n be a vector-function and its graph is a subspace in T (R n ) = R n (i)r n. The tangent space to the graph at the point (x,f(x)) is the graph of (df) x - the differential of F at the point x. This graph is a Lagrangian subspace in T (R n ) iff (df) x is a symmetric endomorphism. The matrix F i x j is symmetric x iff the differential form i F idx i Λ 1 (R n ) is closed or, equivalently, exact: F i = f x i = F = f. The projection of the graph of f on (R n ) x is given in coordinates by 2 (f) = det 2 f i. xj 2

Symplectic Linear Algebra Digression Let (V,Ω) be a symplectic 2n-dimensional vector space over R and Λ (V ) the space of exteriors forms on V. Let Γ : V V be the isomorphism determined by Ω and let X Ω Λ 2 (V) be the unique bivector such that Γ (X Ω ) = Ω.

Symplectic Linear Algebra Digression Let (V,Ω) be a symplectic 2n-dimensional vector space over R and Λ (V ) the space of exteriors forms on V. Let Γ : V V be the isomorphism determined by Ω and let X Ω Λ 2 (V) be the unique bivector such that Γ (X Ω ) = Ω. We introduce the operators : Λ k (V ) Λ k+2 (V ), ω ω Ω and : Λ k (V ) Λ k 2 (V ), ω i XΩ (ω). They have the followings properties:

Symplectic Linear Algebra Digression Let (V,Ω) be a symplectic 2n-dimensional vector space over R and Λ (V ) the space of exteriors forms on V. Let Γ : V V be the isomorphism determined by Ω and let X Ω Λ 2 (V) be the unique bivector such that Γ (X Ω ) = Ω. We introduce the operators : Λ k (V ) Λ k+2 (V ), ω ω Ω and : Λ k (V ) Λ k 2 (V ), ω i XΩ (ω). They have the followings properties: [, ](ω) = (n k)ω, ω Λ k (V ); : Λ k (V ) Λ k 2 (V ) is into for k n+1; : Λ k (V ) Λ k+2 (V ) is into for k n 1.

Symplectic Linear Algebra Digression Let (V,Ω) be a symplectic 2n-dimensional vector space over R and Λ (V ) the space of exteriors forms on V. Let Γ : V V be the isomorphism determined by Ω and let X Ω Λ 2 (V) be the unique bivector such that Γ (X Ω ) = Ω. We introduce the operators : Λ k (V ) Λ k+2 (V ), ω ω Ω and : Λ k (V ) Λ k 2 (V ), ω i XΩ (ω). They have the followings properties: [, ](ω) = (n k)ω, ω Λ k (V ); : Λ k (V ) Λ k 2 (V ) is into for k n+1; : Λ k (V ) Λ k+2 (V ) is into for k n 1. A k-form ω is effective if ω = 0 and we will denote by Λ k ε(v ) the vector space of effective k-forms on V. When k = n, ω is effective if and only if ω Ω = 0.

Hodge-Lepage-Lychagin theorem Figure: Hodge and Lychagin The next theorem plays the fundamental role played by the effective forms in the theory of Monge-Ampère operators : Theorem (Hodge-Lepage-Lychagin) Every form ω Λ k (V ) can be uniquely decomposed into the finite sum ω = ω 0 + ω 1 + 2 ω 2 +..., where all ω i are effective forms.

Hodge-Lepage-Lychagin theorem Figure: Hodge and Lychagin The next theorem plays the fundamental role played by the effective forms in the theory of Monge-Ampère operators : Theorem (Hodge-Lepage-Lychagin) Every form ω Λ k (V ) can be uniquely decomposed into the finite sum ω = ω 0 + ω 1 + 2 ω 2 +..., where all ω i are effective forms. If two effective k-forms vanish on the same k-dimensional isotropic vector subspaces in (V,Ω), they are proportional.

MAO definition Let M be an n-dimensional smooth manifold. Denote by J 1 M the space of 1-jets of smooth functions on M and by j 1 (f) : M J 1 M, x [f] 1 x the natural section associated with a smooth function f on M.

MAO definition Let M be an n-dimensional smooth manifold. Denote by J 1 M the space of 1-jets of smooth functions on M and by j 1 (f) : M J 1 M, x [f] 1 x the natural section associated with a smooth function f on M. The Monge-Ampère operator ω : C (M) Ω n (M) associated with a differential n-form ω Ω n (J 1 M) is the differential operator ω (f) = j 1 (f) (ω).

Contact Structure A contact structures is some analogue of symplectic structure on odd-dimensional manifold. A differential 1-form U on a smooth manifold M is called nondegenerate if the following conditions hold: The map P : a M ker U a T a M is a 1-codimensional distribution;

Contact Structure A contact structures is some analogue of symplectic structure on odd-dimensional manifold. A differential 1-form U on a smooth manifold M is called nondegenerate if the following conditions hold: The map P : a M ker U a T a M is a 1-codimensional distribution; A restriction of du to the hyperplane P(a) is a symplectic structure on P(a) for any a M.

Contact Structure A contact structures is some analogue of symplectic structure on odd-dimensional manifold. A differential 1-form U on a smooth manifold M is called nondegenerate if the following conditions hold: The map P : a M ker U a T a M is a 1-codimensional distribution; A restriction of du to the hyperplane P(a) is a symplectic structure on P(a) for any a M. The last condition means that if a vector X a P(a) and X a ( du P(a) ) = 0, then Xa = 0. In other words, a differential 1-form U is nondegenerate if the distribution P has no characteristic symmetries.

Example: Cartan form The Cartan form U = du pdx on R 3 is a nondegenerate 1-form.

Example: Cartan form The Cartan form U = du pdx on R 3 is a nondegenerate 1-form. Figure: Contact structure in R 3

Generalized Solutions Let U be the contact 1-form on J 1 M and X 1 be the Reeb s vector field. Denote by C(x) the kernel of U x for x J 1 M.

Generalized Solutions Let U be the contact 1-form on J 1 M and X 1 be the Reeb s vector field. Denote by C(x) the kernel of U x for x J 1 M. (C(x),dU x ) is a 2n-dimensional symplectic vector space and T x J 1 M = C(x) RX 1x.

Generalized Solutions Let U be the contact 1-form on J 1 M and X 1 be the Reeb s vector field. Denote by C(x) the kernel of U x for x J 1 M. (C(x),dU x ) is a 2n-dimensional symplectic vector space and T x J 1 M = C(x) RX 1x. A generalized solution of the equation ω = 0 is a legendrian submanifold L n of (J 1 M,U) such that ω L = 0. Note that T x L is a lagrangian subspace of (C(x),dU x ) in each point x L, and that L is locally the graph of a section j 1 (f), where f is a regular solution of the equation ω (f) = 0, if and only if the projection π : J 1 M M is a local diffeomorphism on L.

Effective Forms - MAO Correspondence Denote by Ω (C ) the space of differential forms vanishing on X 1. In each point x, (Ω k (C )) x can be naturally identified with Λ k (C(x) ).

Effective Forms - MAO Correspondence Denote by Ω (C ) the space of differential forms vanishing on X 1. In each point x, (Ω k (C )) x can be naturally identified with Λ k (C(x) ). Let Ω ε (C ) be the space of forms which are effective on (C(x),dU x ) in each point x J 1 M.

Effective Forms - MAO Correspondence Denote by Ω (C ) the space of differential forms vanishing on X 1. In each point x, (Ω k (C )) x can be naturally identified with Λ k (C(x) ). Let Ω ε (C ) be the space of forms which are effective on (C(x),dU x ) in each point x J 1 M. The first part of the Hodge-Lepage-Lychagin theorem means that Ω ε(c ) = Ω (J 1 M)/I C, where I C is the Cartan ideal generated by U and du.

Effective Forms - MAO Correspondence Denote by Ω (C ) the space of differential forms vanishing on X 1. In each point x, (Ω k (C )) x can be naturally identified with Λ k (C(x) ). Let Ω ε (C ) be the space of forms which are effective on (C(x),dU x ) in each point x J 1 M. The first part of the Hodge-Lepage-Lychagin theorem means that Ω ε(c ) = Ω (J 1 M)/I C, where I C is the Cartan ideal generated by U and du. The second part means that two differential n-forms ω and θ on J 1 M determine the same Monge-Ampère operator if and only if ω θ I C.

Contact Groupe Action Ct(M), the pseudo-group of contact diffeomorphisms on J 1 M, naturally acts on the set of Monge-Ampère operators in the following way

Contact Groupe Action Ct(M), the pseudo-group of contact diffeomorphisms on J 1 M, naturally acts on the set of Monge-Ampère operators in the following way F( ω ) = F (ω), and the corresponding infinitesimal action is X( ω ) = LX (ω).

Symplectic MAO-1 We are interested in particular in a more restrictive class of operators, the class of symplectic operators. These operators satisfy X 1 ( ω ) = LX1 (ω) = 0.

Symplectic MAO-1 We are interested in particular in a more restrictive class of operators, the class of symplectic operators. These operators satisfy X 1 ( ω ) = LX1 (ω) = 0. Let T M be the cotangent space and Ω be the canonical symplectic form on it. Let us consider the projection β : J 1 M T M, defined by the following commutative diagram:

Symplectic MAO-1 We are interested in particular in a more restrictive class of operators, the class of symplectic operators. These operators satisfy X 1 ( ω ) = LX1 (ω) = 0. Let T M be the cotangent space and Ω be the canonical symplectic form on it. Let us consider the projection β : J 1 M T M, defined by the following commutative diagram: α R J 1 M T M f 33333333333333333 j 1 (f) df 3 M β

Symplectic MAO-2 We can naturally identify the space {ω Ω ε(c ) : L X1 ω = 0} with the space of effective forms on (T M,Ω) using this projection β. Then, the group acting on these forms is the group of symplectomorphisms of T M.

Symplectic MAO-2 We can naturally identify the space {ω Ω ε(c ) : L X1 ω = 0} with the space of effective forms on (T M,Ω) using this projection β. Then, the group acting on these forms is the group of symplectomorphisms of T M. Definition A Monge-Ampère structure on a 2n-dimensional manifold X is a pair of differential form (Ω,ω) Ω 2 (X) Ω n (X) such that Ω is symplectic and ω is Ω-effective i.e. Ω ω = 0.

Symplectic MAO-2 We can naturally identify the space {ω Ω ε(c ) : L X1 ω = 0} with the space of effective forms on (T M,Ω) using this projection β. Then, the group acting on these forms is the group of symplectomorphisms of T M. Definition A Monge-Ampère structure on a 2n-dimensional manifold X is a pair of differential form (Ω,ω) Ω 2 (X) Ω n (X) such that Ω is symplectic and ω is Ω-effective i.e. Ω ω = 0. When we locally identify the symplectic manifold (X,Ω) with (T R n,ω 0 ), we can associate to the pair (Ω,ω) a symplectic Monge-Ampère equation ω = 0.

Symplectic MAO-2 We can naturally identify the space {ω Ω ε(c ) : L X1 ω = 0} with the space of effective forms on (T M,Ω) using this projection β. Then, the group acting on these forms is the group of symplectomorphisms of T M. Definition A Monge-Ampère structure on a 2n-dimensional manifold X is a pair of differential form (Ω,ω) Ω 2 (X) Ω n (X) such that Ω is symplectic and ω is Ω-effective i.e. Ω ω = 0. When we locally identify the symplectic manifold (X,Ω) with (T R n,ω 0 ), we can associate to the pair (Ω,ω) a symplectic Monge-Ampère equation ω = 0. Conversely, any symplectic Monge-Ampere equation ω = 0 on a manifold M is associated with Monge-Ampère structure (Ω,ω) on T M.

Correspondence: Forms -Symplectic MAO Let M be a smooth n dimensional manifold and ω is a differential n-form on T M. A (symplectic) Monge-Ampère operator ω : C (M) Ω n (M) is the differential operator defined by ω (f) = (df) (ω), where df : M T M is the natural section associated to f.

Examples ω ω = 0 dq 1 dp 2 dq 2 dp 1 f = 0 dq 1 dp 2 + dq 2 dp 1 f = 0 dp 1 dp 2 dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 dq 3 Hess(f) = 1 dp 1 dq 2 dq 3 dp 2 dq 1 dq 3 f Hess(f) = 0 +dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 dp 1 dp 2 dp 3

Generic types of singularities for Generalized solutions of MAE Figure: Lagrangian singularities (Wave fronts, foldings etc.)

Symplectic Monge-Ampère Equations: Solutions A generalized solution of a MAE ω = 0 is a lagrangian submanifold of (T M,Ω) which is an integral manifold for the MA differential form ω: ω L = 0.

Symplectic Monge-Ampère Equations: Solutions A generalized solution of a MAE ω = 0 is a lagrangian submanifold of (T M,Ω) which is an integral manifold for the MA differential form ω: ω L = 0. A generalized solution (generically) locally is the graph of an 1-forme df for a regular solution f.

Generalized solution T* R n df L dg π dh R n Figure: Generalized solution of a MAE

Symplectic Equivalence-1 Two SMAE ω1 = 0 and ω2 = 0 are locally equivalent iff there is exist a local symplectomorphism F : (T M,Ω) (T M,Ω) such that F ω 1 = ω 2.

Symplectic Equivalence-1 Two SMAE ω1 = 0 and ω2 = 0 are locally equivalent iff there is exist a local symplectomorphism F : (T M,Ω) (T M,Ω) such that F ω 1 = ω 2. L is a generalized solution of F ω 1 = 0 iff F(L) is a generalized solution of ω = 0.

Legendre partial transformation Figure: Legendre u q1 q 1 + u q2 q 2 = 0 v q1 q 1 v q2 q 2 v 2 q 1 q 2 = 1 Φ ω = dq 1 dp 2 dq 2 dp 1 ω = dp 1 dp 2 dq 1 dq 2

Legendre partial transformation-2 L u = ( q 1,q 2,u q1,u q2 ) Φ L v = ( q 1, q 2,v q1,v q2 ) = ( q 1, u q2,u q1,q 2 ) e q 1 cos(q 2 ) q 2 arcsin(q 2 e q 1 ) + e 2q 1 q 2 2 with Φ : T R 2 T R 2, (q 1,q 2,p 1,p 2 ) (q 1, p 2,p 1,q 2 ).

Table 1. ω = 0 ω pf(ω) f = 0 dq 1 dp 2 dq 2 dp 1 1 f = 0 dq 1 dp 2 + dq 2 dp 1 1 2 f q 2 1 = 0 dq 1 dp 2 0

Geometric Structures on T R 2. Let (Ω,ω) be a Monge-Ampère structure on X = R 4. The field of endomorphisms A ω : X TX T X is defined by REMARK The tensor ω(, ) = Ω(A ω, ). J ω = A ω pf(ω) gives an almost-complex structure on X if pf(ω) > 0.

Geometric Structures on T R 2. Let (Ω,ω) be a Monge-Ampère structure on X = R 4. The field of endomorphisms A ω : X TX T X is defined by REMARK The tensor ω(, ) = Ω(A ω, ). J ω = A ω pf(ω) gives an almost-complex structure on X if pf(ω) > 0. an almost-product structure on X if pf(ω) < 0.

THEOREM (Lychagin-R.) Let ω Ω 2 ε (R4 ) be an effective non-degenerate 2-form on (R 4,Ω). The following assertions are equivalent:

THEOREM (Lychagin-R.) Let ω Ω 2 ε (R4 ) be an effective non-degenerate 2-form on (R 4,Ω). The following assertions are equivalent: The equation ω = 0 is locally equivalent to one of two linear equations: f = 0 ou f = 0;

THEOREM (Lychagin-R.) Let ω Ω 2 ε (R4 ) be an effective non-degenerate 2-form on (R 4,Ω). The following assertions are equivalent: The equation ω = 0 is locally equivalent to one of two linear equations: f = 0 ou f = 0; The tensor J ω is integrable;

THEOREM (Lychagin-R.) Let ω Ω 2 ε (R4 ) be an effective non-degenerate 2-form on (R 4,Ω). The following assertions are equivalent: The equation ω = 0 is locally equivalent to one of two linear equations: f = 0 ou f = 0; The tensor J ω is integrable; ω the normalized form is closed. pf(ω)

Courant Bracket T tangent bundle of M and T cotangent bundle. (X +ξ,y +η) = 1 2 (ξ(y)+η(x)), -natural indefinite interior product on T T. The Courant bracket on sections of T T is [X +ξ,y +η] = [X,Y]+L X η L Y ξ 1 2 d(ι Xη ι Y ξ).

Generalized Complex Geometry Figure: Hitchin DEFINITION [Hitchin]: An almost generalized complex structure is a bundle map J : T T T T with and J 2 = 1, (J, ) = (,J ). An almost generalized complex structure is integrable if the spaces of sections of its two eigenspaces are closed under the Courant bracket.

2D SMAE and Generalized Complex Geometry DEFINITION A Monge-Ampère equation ω = 0 has a divergent type if the corresponded form can be chosen closed : ω = ω +µω.

2D SMAE and Generalized Complex Geometry DEFINITION A Monge-Ampère equation ω = 0 has a divergent type if the corresponded form can be chosen closed : ω = ω +µω. PROPOSITION (B.Banos) Let ω = 0 be a Monge-Ampère divergent type equation on R 2 with closed ω (which might be non-effective). The generalized almost-complex structure defined by ( A J ω = ω Ω 1 ) Ω(1+A 2 ω, ) A ω is integrable.

Hitchin pairs (after M.Crainic) A Hitchin pair is a pair of bivectors π and Π, Π non-degenerate, satisfying { [Π,Π] = [π,π] (1) [Π,π] = 0. PROPOSITION There is a 1-1 correspondence between Generalized complex structure ( ) A πa J = σ A with σ non degenerate and Hitchin pairs of bivector (π,π). In this correspondence σ = Π 1 A = π Π 1 π A = (1+A 2 )Π

Hitchin pair of bivectors in 4D Π is non-degenerate two 2-forms ω and Ω, not necessarily closed and ω(, ) = Ω(A, ). A generalized lagrangian surface: closed under A, or equivalently, bilagrangian: ω L = Ω L = 0. Locally, L is defined by two functions u and v satisfying a first order system:

Jacobi systems { a+b u x + c u y + d v x + e v y + f det J u,v = 0 A+B u x + C u y + D v x + E v y + E det J u,v = 0 ) J u,v = ( u x v x u y v y Such a system generalizes both MAE and Cauchy-Riemann systems and is called a Jacobi system.

Invariants for effective 3-forms To each effective 3-form ω Ω 3 ε (R6 ), we assign the following geometric invariants:

Invariants for effective 3-forms To each effective 3-form ω Ω 3 ε (R6 ), we assign the following geometric invariants: the Lychagin-R. metric defined by g ω (X,Y) = (ι Xω) (ι Y ω) Ω Ω 3,

Invariants for effective 3-forms To each effective 3-form ω Ω 3 ε (R6 ), we assign the following geometric invariants: the Lychagin-R. metric defined by the Hitchin tensor defined by g ω (X,Y) = (ι Xω) (ι Y ω) Ω Ω 3, g ω = Ω(A ω, ),

Invariants for effective 3-forms To each effective 3-form ω Ω 3 ε (R6 ), we assign the following geometric invariants: the Lychagin-R. metric defined by the Hitchin tensor defined by The Hitchin pfaffian defined by g ω (X,Y) = (ι Xω) (ι Y ω) Ω Ω 3, g ω = Ω(A ω, ), pf(ω) = 1 6 tra2 ω.

(0,3) 0 (2,1) 0 ω = 0 ω ε(q ω ) pf(ω) 1 hess(f) = 1 dq 1 dq 2 dq 3 +ν dp 1 dp 2 dp 3 (3,3) ν 4 2 f hess(f) = 0 dp 1 dq 2 dq 3 dp 2 dq 1 dq 3 (0,6) ν 4 +dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 ν 2 dp 1 dp 2 dp 3 3 f + hess(f) = 0 dp 1 dq 2 dq 3 + dp 2 dq 1 dq 3 (4,2) ν 4 +dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 +ν 2 dp 1 dp 2 dp 3 4 f = 0 dp 1 dq 2 dq 3 dp 2 dq 1 dq 3 + dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 5 f = 0 dp 1 dq 2 dq 3 +dp 2 dq 1 dq 3 + dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 6 q2,q 3 f = 0 dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 dp 2 dq 1 dq 3 (0,1) 0 7 q2,q 3 f = 0 dp 3 dq 1 dq 2 + dp 2 dq 1 dq 3 (1,0) 0 8 2 f q 2 1 = 0 dp 1 dq 2 dq 3 (0,0) 0 9 0 (0, 0) 0 Table: Classification of effective 3-formes in dimension 6

3D Generalized Calabi-Yau structures A generalized almost Calabi-Yau structure on a 6D-manifold X is a 5-uple (g,ω,a,α,β) where g is a (pseudo) metric on X,

3D Generalized Calabi-Yau structures A generalized almost Calabi-Yau structure on a 6D-manifold X is a 5-uple (g,ω,a,α,β) where g is a (pseudo) metric on X, Ω is a symplectic on X, A generalized Calabi-Yau structure (g, Ω, K, α, β) is integrable if α and β are closed.

3D Generalized Calabi-Yau structures A generalized almost Calabi-Yau structure on a 6D-manifold X is a 5-uple (g,ω,a,α,β) where g is a (pseudo) metric on X, Ω is a symplectic on X, A is a smooth section X TX T X such that A 2 = ±Id and such that g(u, V) = Ω(AU, V) for all tangent vectors U, V, A generalized Calabi-Yau structure (g, Ω, K, α, β) is integrable if α and β are closed.

3D Generalized Calabi-Yau structures A generalized almost Calabi-Yau structure on a 6D-manifold X is a 5-uple (g,ω,a,α,β) where g is a (pseudo) metric on X, Ω is a symplectic on X, A is a smooth section X TX T X such that A 2 = ±Id and such that g(u, V) = Ω(AU, V) for all tangent vectors U, V, α and β are (eventually complex) decomposable 3-forms whose associated distributions are the distributions of A eigenvectors and such that α β Ω 3 is constant. A generalized Calabi-Yau structure (g, Ω, K, α, β) is integrable if α and β are closed.

Generalized CY and MA Each nondegenerate Monge-Ampère structure (Ω,ω 0 ) defines a generalized almost Calabi-Yau structure (q ω,ω,a ω,α,β) with ω 0 ω = λ(ω0 ). 4

The generalized Calabi-Yau structure associated with the equation (f) hess(f) = 0 is the canonical Calabi-Yau structure of C 3 g = 3 dx j.dx j + dy j.dy j j=1 A = 3 y j dx j x j dy j j=1 Ω = 3 dx j dy j j=1 α = dz 1 dz 2 dz 3 β = α

The generalized Calabi-Yau associated with the equation (f)+hess(f) = 0 is the pseudo Calabi-Yau structure g = dx 1.dx 1 dx 2.dx 2 + dx 3.dx 3 + dy 1.dy 1 dy 2.dy 2 + dx 3.dx 3 A = x 1 dy 1 y 1 dx 1 + y 2 dx 2 x 2 dy 2 y 3 dx 3 + x 3 dy 3 Ω = 3 dx j dy j j=1 α = dz 1 dz 2 dz 3 β = α

The generalized Calabi-Yau structure associated with the equation is the real Calabi-Yau structure g = 3 dx j.dy j j=1 hess(f) = 1 A = 3 x j dx j y j dy j j=1 Ω = 3 dx j dy j j=1 α = dx 1 dx 2 dx 3 β = dy 1 dy 2 dy 3

THEOREM A SMAE ω = 0 on R 3 associated to an effective non-degenerated form ω is locally equivalent to on of three following equations:

THEOREM A SMAE ω = 0 on R 3 associated to an effective non-degenerated form ω is locally equivalent to on of three following equations: hess(f) = 1 f hess(f) = 0 f + hess(f) = 0

THEOREM A SMAE ω = 0 on R 3 associated to an effective non-degenerated form ω is locally equivalent to on of three following equations: hess(f) = 1 f hess(f) = 0 f + hess(f) = 0 iff the correspondingly defined generalized Calabi-Yau structure is integrable and locally flat.