Upper Bounds for the Modified Second Multiplicative Zagreb Index of Graph Operations Bommanahal Basavanagoud 1, a *, Shreekant Patil 2, b

Similar documents
HYPER ZAGREB INDEX OF BRIDGE AND CHAIN GRAPHS

More on Zagreb Coindices of Composite Graphs

Zagreb indices of block-edge transformation graphs and their complements

BoundsonVertexZagrebIndicesofGraphs

The multiplicative Zagreb indices of graph operations

It can be easily shown that the above definition is equivalent to

(Received: 19 October 2018; Received in revised form: 28 November 2018; Accepted: 29 November 2018; Available Online: 3 January 2019)

On the Leap Zagreb Indices of Generalized xyz-point-line Transformation Graphs T xyz (G) when z = 1

A Note on Revised Szeged Index of Graph Operations

arxiv: v1 [cs.dm] 31 Mar 2013

On Degree Sum Energy of a Graph

The Forgotten Topological Index of Four Operations on Some Special Graphs Sirous Ghobadi 1,a *, Mobina Ghorbaninejad 2,b

Research Article. Generalized Zagreb index of V-phenylenic nanotubes and nanotori

THE HOSOYA INDEX AND THE MERRIFIELD-SIMMONS INDEX OF SOME GRAPHS. Communicated by Alireza Ashrafi. 1. Introduction

Extremal Graphs with Respect to the Zagreb Coindices

MULTIPLICATIVE ZAGREB ECCENTRICITY INDICES OF SOME COMPOSITE GRAPHS. Communicated by Ali Reza Ashrafi. 1. Introduction

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 14 May 2018

EXACT FORMULAE OF GENERAL SUM-CONNECTIVITY INDEX FOR SOME GRAPH OPERATIONS. Shehnaz Akhter, Rashid Farooq and Shariefuddin Pirzada

VERTEX-WEIGHTED WIENER POLYNOMIALS OF SUBDIVISION-RELATED GRAPHS. Mahdieh Azari, Ali Iranmanesh, and Tomislav Došlić

Extremal Zagreb Indices of Graphs with a Given Number of Cut Edges

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 5 Sep 2016

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 17 Apr 2018

Topological indices: the modified Schultz index

Estimating Some General Molecular Descriptors of Saturated Hydrocarbons

A NOVEL/OLD MODIFICATION OF THE FIRST ZAGREB INDEX

Magic Graphoidal on Class of Trees A. Nellai Murugan

A New Multiplicative Arithmetic-Geometric Index

ZAGREB INDICES AND ZAGREB COINDICES OF SOME GRAPH OPERATIONS

Vertex-Weighted Wiener Polynomials for Composite Graphs

ON THE GENERALIZED ZAGREB INDEX OF DENDRIMER NANOSTARS

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 13 Mar 2018

The sharp bounds on general sum-connectivity index of four operations on graphs

A Survey on Comparing Zagreb Indices

CCO Commun. Comb. Optim.

THE REVISED EDGE SZEGED INDEX OF BRIDGE GRAPHS

Some properties of the first general Zagreb index

A new version of Zagreb indices. Modjtaba Ghorbani, Mohammad A. Hosseinzadeh. Abstract

COMPUTING SANSKRUTI INDEX OF DENDRIMER NANOSTARS. Chengdu University Chengdu, , P.R. CHINA 2 Department of Mathematics

THE HARMONIC INDEX OF EDGE-SEMITOTAL GRAPHS, TOTAL GRAPHS AND RELATED SUMS

THE HARMONIC INDEX OF SUBDIVISION GRAPHS. Communicated by Ali Reza Ashrafi. 1. Introduction

Discrete Applied Mathematics archive Volume 156, Issue 10 (May 2008) table of contents Pages Year of Publication: 2008 ISSN: X

THE WIENER INDEX AND HOSOYA POLYNOMIAL OF A CLASS OF JAHANGIR GRAPHS

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 3 Jul 2017

SOME VERTEX-DEGREE-BASED TOPOLOGICAL INDICES UNDER EDGE CORONA PRODUCT

Some results on the reciprocal sum-degree distance of graphs

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 6 Feb 2011

Computing distance moments on graphs with transitive Djoković-Winkler s relation

Discrete Applied Mathematics

A Creative Review on Integer Additive Set-Valued Graphs

Computation of New Degree Based Topological Indices of Dutch Windmill Graph

THE GENERALIZED ZAGREB INDEX OF CAPRA-DESIGNED PLANAR BENZENOID SERIES Ca k (C 6 )

Inverse and Disjoint Restrained Domination in Graphs

ON THE WIENER INDEX AND LAPLACIAN COEFFICIENTS OF GRAPHS WITH GIVEN DIAMETER OR RADIUS

M-Polynomial and Degree-Based Topological Indices

Extremal Topological Indices for Graphs of Given Connectivity

On the higher randić indices of nanotubes

A LOWER BOUND FOR RADIO k-chromatic NUMBER OF AN ARBITRARY GRAPH

Further results on relaxed mean labeling

On Pairs of Disjoint Dominating Sets in a Graph

Academic Editor: Angel Garrido Received: 9 October 2016; Accepted: 11 November 2016; Published: 18 November 2016

Energy and Laplacian Energy of Graphs. ALI REZA ASHRAFI Department of Mathematics, University of Kashan, Kashan , I. R.

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 15 Sep 2016

Counting the average size of Markov graphs

CCO Commun. Comb. Optim.

Some Bounds on General Sum Connectivity Index

On the difference between the revised Szeged index and the Wiener index

A Method of Calculating the Edge Szeged Index of Hexagonal Chain

THE (a,b)-zagreb INDEX OF NANOSTAR DENDRIMERS

On the Randić index. Huiqing Liu. School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Hubei University, Wuhan , China

Journal of Science and Arts Year 17, No. 1(38), pp , 2017

Extremal Values of Vertex Degree Topological Indices Over Hexagonal Systems

Article On the Additively Weighted Harary Index of Some Composite Graphs

Hexagonal Chains with Segments of Equal Lengths Having Distinct Sizes and the Same Wiener Index

TWO TYPES OF CONNECTIVITY INDICES OF THE LINEAR PARALLELOGRAM BENZENOID

Multiplicative Connectivity Revan Indices of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Benzenoid Systems

CCO Commun. Comb. Optim.

On a Class of Distance Based Molecular Structure Descriptors

Energy, Laplacian Energy and Zagreb Index of Line Graph, Middle Graph and Total Graph

Improved bounds on the difference between the Szeged index and the Wiener index of graphs

DOMINATION IN DEGREE SPLITTING GRAPHS S , S t. is a set of vertices having at least two vertices and having the same degree and T = V S i

Extremal trees with fixed degree sequence for atom-bond connectivity index

THE GRAPHS WHOSE PERMANENTAL POLYNOMIALS ARE SYMMETRIC

ENERGY OF SOME CLUSTER GRAPHS

INDEPENDENT TRANSVERSAL DOMINATION IN GRAPHS

PAijpam.eu SOME NEW/OLD DEGREE-BASED TOPOLOGICAL INDICES OF NANOSTAR DENDRIMERS

Redefined Zagreb, Randic, Harmonic and GA Indices of Graphene

Keywords: Szeged index, TUAC 6 [ p, k ] Nanotube

Predicting Some Physicochemical Properties of Octane Isomers: A Topological Approach Using ev-degree. Süleyman Ediz 1

On Total Domination Polynomials of Certain Graphs

arxiv: v1 [cs.dm] 9 Jun 2011

Interpolation method and topological indices: 2-parametric families of graphs

COUNTING RELATIONS FOR GENERAL ZAGREB INDICES

PAijpam.eu ON TOPOLOGICAL INDICES FOR THE LINE GRAPH OF FIRECRACKER GRAPH Ashaq Ali 1, Hifza Iqbal 2, Waqas Nazeer 3, Shin Min Kang 4

Key words: matching polynomial; acyclic polynomial; matching generating polynomial; perfect matching; Hosoya index; Pfaffian orientation

Correlation of domination parameters with physicochemical properties of octane isomers

M-POLYNOMIALS AND DEGREE-BASED TOPOLOGICAL INDICES OF SOME FAMILIES OF CONVEX POLYTOPES

Wiener Index of Graphs and Their Line Graphs

K-DOMINATION ON HEXAGONAL CACTUS CHAINS

The Fibonacci numbers for the molecular graphs of linear phenylenes

Super Mean Labeling of Some Classes of Graphs

Transcription:

Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences and Applications Submitted: 06-03- ISSN: 78-9634, Vol. 7, pp 0-6 Revised: 06-08-7 doi:0.805/www.scipress.com/bmsa.7.0 Accepted: 06-08-6 06 SciPress Ltd., Switzerland Online: 06--0 Upper Bounds for the Modified Second Multiplicative Zagreb Index of Graph Operations Bommanahal Basavanagoud, a *, Shreekant Patil, b, Department of Mathematics, Karnatak University, Dharwad - 580 003, Karnataka, India a b.basavanagoud@gmail.com, b shreekantpatil949@gmail.com Keywords: Zagreb index, hyper-zagreb index, modified second multiplicative Zagreb index, graph operations. Abstract. The modified second multiplicative Zagreb index of a connected graph G, denoted by (G), is defined as (G) = uv E(G) [d G (u) + d G (v)] [d G(u)+d G (v)] d G (z) is the degree of a vertex z in G. In this paper, we present some upper bounds for the modified second multiplicative Zagreb index of graph operations such as union, join, Cartesian product, composition and corona product of graphs are derived.. Introduction Throughout this paper, we consider only simple connected graphs. Let G be such a graph on n vertices and m edges. We denote the vertex set and edge set of G by V(G) and E(G), respectively. Thus, V(G) = n and E(G) = m. As usual, n is said to be the order and m the size of G. If u and v are two adjacent vertices of G, then the edge connecting them will be denoted by uv. The degree of a vertex w V(G) is the number of vertices adjacent to w and is denoted by d G (w). We refer to [9] for unexplained terminology and notation. In theoretical chemistry, the physico-chemical properties of chemical compounds are often modeled by means of molecular-graph-based structure-descriptors, which are also referred to as topological indices [8, 4]. The first and second Zagreb indices, respectively, defined M (G) = u V(G) d G (u) and M (G) = uv E(G) d G (u)d G (v) are widely studied degree-based topological indices, that were introduced by Gutman and Trinajstic [7] in 97. In 03, G. H. Shirdel, H. Rezapour and A. M. Sayadi [3] introduced a new version of Zagreb index named hyper-zagreb index which is defined for a graph G as HM(G) = uv E(G) (d G (u) + d G (v)). Recently, Basavanagoud et al. [5] introduced a multiplicative version of index named modified second multiplicative Zagreb index and is defined as (G) = uv E(G) [d G (u) + d G (v)] [d G(u)+d G (v)] In this paper, we present some upper bounds for the modified second multiplicative Zagreb index of graph operations such as union, join, Cartesian product, composition and corona product of graphs are derived. Readers interested in more information on computing topological indices of graph operations can be referred to [-4, 6, 0-]. The following lemma is useful for proving our main results. SciPress applies the CC-BY 4.0 license to works we publish: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences and Applications Vol. 7 Lemma.. (Weighted AM-GM inequality) Let x, x,..., x n be nonnegative numbers and also let w, w,..., w n be nonnegative weights. Set w = w + w + +w n. If w > 0, then the inequality w x +w x + +w n x n w w w x w x w x n n holds with equality if and only if all the x k with w k > 0 are equal.. Main results All the operations considered are binary, hence we deal with two finite and simple graphs, G and G. For a given graph G i, its vertex and edge sets will be denoted by V(G i ) and E(G i ), respectively, and their cardinalities by n i and m i, respectively, i =,... Union A union G G of the graphs G and G is the graph with the vertex set V(G ) V(G ) and the edge set E(G ) E(G ). The degree d G G (u) of a vertex u is equal to the degree of u in the component G i ; i =, that contains it. The following theorem obvious by definition. Theorem.. Let G and G be two simple graphs. Then.. Join (G G ) = (G ) (G ) The join G + G of graphs G and G is a graph with the vertex set V(G ) V(G ) and edge set E(G ) E(G ) {uv: u V(G ) and v V(G )}. If u is a vertex of G + G then d G +G (u) = { d G (u) + n if u V(G ) d G (u) + n if u V(G ). Theorem.. The modified second multiplicative Zagreb index of G + G satisfies the following (G + G ) [ HM(G )+4n m +4n M (G ) ] M (G )+m n [ HM(G )+4n m +4n M (G ) M (G )+m n M (G )+m n ] M (G )+m n [ n M (G )+n M (G )+8m m +n n (n +n ) +4(n +n )(n m +m n ) ] n m +m n +n n (n +n ) () n m +m n +n n (n +n ) the equality holds in () if and only if G and G are regular graphs. Proof. By definition of modified second multiplicative Zagreb index, we have (G + G ) = uv E(G +G ) [d G +G (u) + d G +G (v)] [d G+G (u)+d G+G (v)] = uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n ] [d G (u)+d G (v)+n] uv E(G ) [d G (u) +d G (v) + n ] [d G (u)+d G (v)+n] u V(G ) v V(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n +n ] [d G (u)+d G (v)+n +n ].

Volume 7 By Lemma., we have (G + G ) [ A uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n ] ] A [ A uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) +n ] ] A [ A u V(G ) v V(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n + n ] ] A 3 () 3 A = uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n ] = M (G ) + m n A = uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n ] = M (G ) + m n A 3 = u V(G ) v V(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n + n ] = n m + m n + n n (n + n ). (G + G ) [ A uv E(G ) [(d G (u) + d G (v)) + 4n + 4n (d G (u) + d G (v))]] A [ A uv E(G ) [(d G (u) + d G (v)) + 4n + 4n (d G (u) + d G (v))]] A [ A 3 u V(G ) v V(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + d G (u)d G (v) + (n + n ) +(n + n )(d G (u) + d G (v))]] A 3 = [ A [HM(G ) + 4n m + 4n M (G )]] A [ A [HM(G ) + 4n m + 4n M (G )]] A [ A 3 [n M (G ) + n M (G ) + 8m m + n n (n + n ) + 4(n + n )(n m +m n )]] A 3. (3) Substituting A, A and A 3 value in (3), we get the inequality (). The equality holds in () if and only if d G (u) + d G (v) + n = d G (r) + d G (s) + n for any uv, rs E(G ), d G (u) + d G (v) + n = d G (r) + d G (s) + n for any uv, rs E(G ) and d G (u) + d G (v) + n + n = d G (r) + d G (s) + n + n for any u, r V(G ), v, s V(G ) by Lemma.. This implies that the equality holds in () if and only if G and G must be regular graphs..3. Cartesian product The Cartesian product G G of graphs G and G has the vertex set V(G G ) = V(G ) V(G ) and (a, x)(b, y) is an edge of G G if and only if [a = b and xy E(G )] or [x = y and ab E(G )]. If (a, x) is a vertex of G G then d G G ((a, x)) = d G (a) + d G (x). Theorem.3. The modified second multiplicative Zagreb index of G G satisfies the following (G G ) [ 4m M (G )+n HM(G )+8m M (G ) 4m m +n M (G ) ] 4m m +n M (G ) [ 4m M (G )+n HM(G )+8m M (G ) ] 4m m +n M (G ) (4) 4m m +n M (G ) the equality holds in (4) if and only if G and G are regular graphs.

Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences and Applications Vol. 7 3 Proof. We have, (G G ) = (u,u )(v,v ) E(G G ) [d G G ((u, u )) u V(G ) +d G G ((v, v ))] [d G G ((u,u ))+d G G ((v,v ))] u v E(G ) [(d G (u ) + d G (u )) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] [(d G (u )+d G (u ))+(d G (u )+d G (v ))] d G (u )) + (d G (v ) + d G (u ))] [(d G (u )+d G (u ))+(d G (v )+d G (u ))] u V(G ) u V(G ) By Lemma., we have u V(G ) u v E(G ) [(d G (u ) + u v E(G ) [d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] [d G (u )+(d G (u )+d G (v ))] u v E(G ) [d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] [d G (u )+(d G (u )+d G (v))]. (G G ) [ B u V(G ) [ B u V(G ) u v E(G ) [d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] ] B u v E(G ) [d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] ] B (5) B = u V(G ) u v E(G ) [d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] = 4m m + n M (G ) B = u V(G ) u v E(G ) [d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] = 4m m + n M (G ). (G G ) [ [4m B M (G ) + n HM(G ) + 8m M (G )]] B [ B [4m M (G ) + n HM(G ) + 8m M (G )]] B. (6) Substituting B and B value in (6), we get the inequality (4). Moreover, the equality holds in (5) if and only if d G (u ) + d G (u ) + d G (v ) = d G (x ) + d G (x ) + d G (y ) for any u, x V(G ) and u v, x y E(G ) and d G (u ) + d G (u ) + d G (v ) = d G (x ) + d G (x ) + d G (y ) for any u, x V(G ) and u v, x y E(G ) by Lemma.. One can easily see that the equality in (5) if and only if d G (u ) = d G (v ) for any u, v V(G ) and d G (u ) = d G (v ) for any u, v V(G ). Hence the equality holds in (4) if and only if both G and G are regular graphs..4. Composition The composition G [G ] of graphs G and G with disjoint vertex sets V(G ) and V(G ) and edge sets E(G ) and E(G ) is the graph with vertex set V(G ) V(G ) and (u, v ) is adjacent to (u, v ) whenever [u is adjacent to u ] or [u = u and v is adjacent to v ]. If (a, b) is a vertex of G [G ] then d G [G ]((a, b)) = n d G (a) + d G (b). Theorem.4 The modified second multiplicative Zagreb index of G [G ] satisfies the following (G [G ]) [ n 4 HM(G )+m n M (G )+8m m +8n m M (G ) ] n n 3 3 M (G )+4m m n M (G )+4m m n [ 4n m M (G )+n HM(G )+8n m M (G ) ] 4n m m +n M (G ) (7) 4n m m +n M (G ) the equality holds in (7) if and only if G and G are regular graphs.

4 Volume 7 Proof. By definition of modified second multiplicative Zagreb index, we have (G [G ]) = (u,u )(v,v ) E(G [G ]) [d G [G ]((u, u )) +d G [G ]((v, v ))] [d G[G]((u,u ))+d G [G]((v,v ))] u v E(G ) u V(G ) v V(G ) [(n d G (u ) + d G (u )) + (n d G (v ) +d G (v ))] [(n d G (u )+d G (u ))+(n d G (v )+d G (v))] u V(G ) u v E(G ) [(n d G (u ) +d G (u )) + (n d G (u ) + d G (v ))] [(n d G (u )+d G (u ))+(n d G (u )+d G (v ))]. By Lemma., we have (G [G ]) [ C u v E(G ) u V(G ) v V(G ) [n (d G (u ) + d G (v )) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] ] C [ C u V(G ) u v E(G ) [n d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] ] C (8) C = u v E(G ) u V(G ) v V(G ) [n (d G (u ) + d G (v )) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] = n 3 M (G ) + 4m m n C = u V(G ) u v E(G ) [n d G (u ) + (d G (u ) + d G (v ))] = 4n m m + n M (G ). (G [G ]) [ [n 4 C HM(G ) + m n M (G ) + 8m m + 8n m M (G )]] C [ C [4n m M (G ) + n HM(G ) + 8n m M (G )]] C (9) which gives the required result in (7) by substituting C and C value in (9). The equality holds in (8) and (9) if and only if d G (u ) = d G (v ) for any u, v V(G ) and d G (u ) = d G (v ) for any u, v V(G ) by Lemma.. Hence the equality holds in (7) if and only if both G and G are regular graphs..5. Corona product The corona product G G is defined as the graph obtained from G and G by taking one copy of G and V(G ) copies of G and then joining by an edge each vertex of the i th copy of G is named (G, i) with the i th vertex of G. If u is a vertex of G G then d G G (u) = { d G (u) + n if u V(G ) d G (u) + if u V(G, i). Theorem.5. The modified second multiplicative Zagreb index of G G satisfies the following (G G ) [ HM(G )+4n m +4n M (G ) ] M (G )+m n [ n [HM(G )+4m +4M (G )] ] n M (G )+m n M (G )+m n n M (G )+m n [ n M (G )+n M (G )+8m m +n n (n +) +4(n +)(n m +m n ) ] n m +m n +n n (n +) (0) n m +m n +n n (n +) the equality holds in (0) if and only if G and G are regular graphs.

Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences and Applications Vol. 7 5 Proof. We have, (G G ) = uv E(G G ) [d G G (u) + d G G (v)] [d G G (u)+d G G (v)] uv E(G ) [d G (u) + n + d G (v) + n ] [d G (u)+n +d G (v)+n ] w V(G ) u V(G ) By Lemma., we have uv E(G ) [d G (u) + + d G (v) + ] [d G (u)++d G (v)+] v V(G ) [d G (u) + n + d G (v) + ] [d G (u)+n +d G (v)+]. (G G ) [ D uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n ] ] D [ D w V(G ) [ D 3 u V(G ) uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + ] ] D v V(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n + ] ] D 3 () D = uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n ] = M (G ) + m n D = w V(G ) uv E(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + ] = n M (G ) + m n D 3 = u V(G ) v V(G ) [d G (u) + d G (v) + n + ] = n m + m n + n n (n + ). (G G ) [ [HM(G D ) + 4n m + 4n M (G )]] D [ [n D [HM(G ) + 4m + 4M (G )]]] D [ D 3 [n M (G ) + n M (G ) + 8m m + n n (n + ) + 4(n + )(n m + m n )]] D 3. () Substituting D, D and D 3 value in (), we get the inequality (0). The equality holds in (0) if and only if d G (u i ) = d G (u j ), u i, u j V(G ) and d G (v k ) = d G (v l ), v k, v l V(G ), that is, both G and G are regular graphs. References [] A.R. Ashrafi, T. Dos lic, A. Hamzeh, The Zagreb coindices of graph operations, Discrete Appl. Math. 58 (00) 57-578. [] M. Azari, A. Iranmanesh, Some inequalities for the multiplicative sum Zagreb index of graph operations, J. Math. Inequal. 9(3) (05) 77-738. [3] B. Basavanagoud, S. Patil, A note on hyper-zagreb index of graph operations, Iranian J. Math. Chem. 7() (06) 89-9. [4] B. Basavanagoud, S. Patil, A note on hyper-zagreb coindex of graph operations, J. Appl. Math. Comput. (06) -9. [5] B. Basavanagoud, S. Patil, Multiplicative Zagreb indices and coindices of some derived graphs, Opuscula Math. 36(3) (06) 87-99. [6] K.C. Das et al., The multiplicative Zagreb indices of graph operations, J. Inequal. Appl. (03) -4. [7] I. Gutman, N. Trinajstic, Graph theory and molecular orbitals. Total π-electron energy of alternant hydrocarbons, Chem. Phys. Lett. 7 (97) 535-538.

6 Volume 7 [8] I. Gutman, O.E. Polansky, Mathematical Concepts in Organic Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, 986. [9] F. Harary, Graph Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 969. [0] M.H. Khalifeh, H. Yousefi-Azari, A.R. Ashrafi, The first and second Zagreb indices of some graph operations, Discrete Appl. Math. 57 (009) 804-8. [] M.H. Khalifeh, H. Yousefi-Azari, A. R. Ashrafi, The hyper-wiener index of graph operations, Comput. Math. Appl. 56 (008) 40-407. [] J. Liu, Q. Zhang, Sharp upper bounds for multiplicative Zagreb indices, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 68 (0) 3-40. [3] G.H. Shirdel, H. Rezapour, A.M. Sayadi, The hyper-zagreb index of graph operations, Iranian J. Math. Chem. 4() (03) 3-0. [4] N. Trinajstic, Chemical Graph Theory, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 99.