Correlations of magnetic features and the torsional pattern

Similar documents
Meridional Flow, Torsional Oscillations, and the Solar Magnetic Cycle

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 29 Mar 2002

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 2 Jun 2006

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 2 Oct 2007

Solar Cycle Prediction and Reconstruction. Dr. David H. Hathaway NASA/Ames Research Center

Sunspot Groups as Tracers of Sub-Surface Processes

Solar Structure. Connections between the solar interior and solar activity. Deep roots of solar activity

Non-homogeneous Behaviour of the Spatial Distribution of Macrospicules

CONSTRAINTS ON THE APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERFACE DYNAMO TO THE SUN

Meridional Flow, Differential Rotation, and the Solar Dynamo

4+ YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC RESULTS WITH SDO/HMI

Predicting a solar cycle before its onset using a flux transport dynamo model

Date of delivery: 29 June 2011 Journal and vol/article ref: IAU Number of pages (not including this page): 5

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Motivation

L. A. Upton. Heliophysics Summer School. July 27 th 2016

WHAT S DOWN WITH THE SUN? MAJOR DROP IN SOLAR ACTIVITY PREDICTED

Understanding solar torsional oscillations from global dynamo models

From Active Region to Polar Field: Understanding Solar Cycle Magnetic Evolution with Measured Near-Surface Flows ABSTRACT

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 11 Oct 2011

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 14 Oct 2007

Dynamical variations of the differential rotation in the solar convection zone

Latitude-time distribution of the solar magnetic fields from 1975 to 2006

Circulation-dominated solar shell dynamo models with positive alpha-effect

The Origin of the Solar Cycle & Helioseismology

Mechanism of Cyclically Polarity Reversing Solar Magnetic Cycle as a Cosmic Dynamo

The Synchronic Frame of Photospheric Magnetic field: The Improved Synoptic Frame

Helioseismology. Bill Chaplin, School of Physics & Astronomy University of Birmingham, UK

Joy s Law: A Space-Age Update Aimee Norton, Stanford University, SDO/HMI

Parity of solar global magnetic field determined by turbulent diffusivity

Solar cycle & Dynamo Modeling

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 21 Apr 2011

SDO/HMI survey of emerging active regions for helioseismology

Meridional flow and differential rotation by gravity darkening in fast rotating solar-type stars

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 20 Dec 2016

COMPLETE LIST OF PUBLICATIONS OF ARNAB RAI CHOUDHURI

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 11 Jan 2016

Prediction of solar activity cycles by assimilating sunspot data into a dynamo model

Solar and stellar dynamo models

Obridko V., Georgieva K. June 6-10, 2016, Bulgaria

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 12 Feb 2016

Recovering Solar Toroidal Field Dynamics From Sunspot Location Patterns. Aimee A. Norton and Peter A. Gilman

Large-scale Flows and Dynamo In Solar-Like Stars

Solar dynamo theory recent progress, questions and answers

Unusual Migration of Prominence Activities in the Southern Hemisphere during Cycles 23 24

A numerical MHD model for the solar tachocline with meridional flow

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 23 Apr 2014

Impact of changes in the Sun s conveyor belt on recent solar cycles

The Synchronic Frame of Photospheric Magnetic field: The Improved Synoptic Frame

Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager for Solar Dynamics Observatory

Active-Region Tilt Angles: Magnetic Versus White-Light Determinations of Joy s Law

The Extreme Solar Activity during October November 2003

Tracing sunspot groups to determine angular momentum transfer on the Sun

Solar small-scale dynamo and polarity of sunspot groups

Local helioseismology using ring diagram analysis

Active longitudes in sunspot activity: Century scale persistence

EVIDENCE THAT A DEEP MERIDIONAL FLOW SETS THE SUNSPOT CYCLE PERIOD David H. Hathaway. Dibyendu Nandy. and Robert M. Wilson and Edwin J.

Time Distance Study of Isolated Sunspots

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 29 Mar 2011

Key words: sunspot cycle solar dynamo Gnevyshev gap Spörer's law

Date of delivery: 29 June 2011 Journal and vol/article ref: IAU Number of pages (not including this page): 5

How radial is the photospheric magnetic field?

An accurate numerical approach for the kinematic dynamo problem

SOLAR DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION INFLUENCED BY LATITUDINAL ENTROPY VARIATIONS IN THE TACHOCLINE

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Jul 2001

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 31 Oct 2006

On the role of tachoclines in solar and stellar dynamos

Asymptotic solutions for dynamo waves and polar activity in the solar cycle Kirill Kuzanyan 1,2)

General Circulation. Nili Harnik DEES, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Dynamo Simulations in Solar Convection Zone

Turbulent three-dimensional MHD dynamo model in spherical shells: Regular oscillations of the dipolar field

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 11 Oct 2012

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 29 Jul 2018

Convection-driven spherical dynamos: remarks on bistability and on simple models of the Solar cycle

Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager for Solar Dynamics Observatory

FARSIDE HELIOSEISMIC HOLOGRAPHY: RECENT ADVANCES

BABCOCK-LEIGHTON SOLAR DYNAMO: THE ROLE OF DOWNWARD PUMPING AND THE EQUATORWARD PROPAGATION OF ACTIVITY

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 3 Nov 2010

The solar butterfly diagram: a low-dimensional model

NORTH SOUTH ASYMMETRY OF DIFFERENT SOLAR ACTIVITY FEATURES DURING SOLAR CYCLE 23. India. Uttarakhand, India *

INFERENCE OF SOLAR SUBSURFACE FLOWS BY TIME-DISTANCE HELIOSEISMOLOGY

Oscillations of the Sun: insights and challenges for the future

The Solar Interior and Helioseismology

Part 1 : solar dynamo models [Paul] Part 2 : Fluctuations and intermittency [Dario] Part 3 : From dynamo to interplanetary magnetic field [Paul]

THE DYNAMO EFFECT IN STARS

Stanford Helioseismology Workshop 6-9 August Sébastien Couvidat & Paul Rajaguru HEPL, Stanford University

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 18 Oct 2014

IS THE SMALL-SCALE MAGNETIC FIELD CORRELATED WITH THE DYNAMO CYCLE? ApJ press (arxiv: ) Bidya Binay Karak & Axel Brandenburg (Nordita)

1. Solar Atmosphere Surface Features and Magnetic Fields

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 28 Nov 2016

Heritage of Konkoly's Solar Observations: the Debrecen Photoheliograph Programme and the Debrecen Sunspot Databases

Probing Magnetic Fields in the Solar Convection Zone with Meridional Flow

The solar dynamo (critical comments on) SPD Hale talk 14 June 2011

Physical Properties of Wave Motion in Inclined Magnetic Fields Within Sunspot Penumbrae

Analysis of Helioseismic Power-Spectrum Diagram of A Sunspot

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.sr] 5 Feb 2018

Problem Set SOLUTIONS: Heliophysics Textbook III: Chapter 5

Studies of Solar Magnetic Cycle and Differential Rotation Based on Mean Field Model. Hideyuki Hotta

How Low is Low? Tom Woods. Latest News on this Current Solar Cycle Minimum. LASP / University of Colorado.

Paul Charbonneau, Université de Montréal

Transcription:

The Physics of Sun and Star Spots Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 273, 2010 D. P. Choudhary & K. G. Strassmeier, eds. c International Astronomical Union 2011 doi:10.1017/s1743921311015626 Correlations of magnetic features and the torsional pattern Judit Muraközy and András Ludmány Heliophysical Observatory, H-4010 Debrecen P.O.Box 30, Hungary Abstract. The striking similarity between the cyclic equatorward migration of the torsional oscillation belts and the sunspot activity latitudes inspired several attempts to seek an explanation of the torsional phenomenon in terms of interactions between flux ropes and plasma motions. The aim of the present work is to examine the spatial and temporal coincidences of the torsional waves and the emergence of sunspot magnetic fields. The locations of the shearing latitudes have been compared with the distributions of certain sunspot parameters by using sunspot data of more than two cycles. The bulges of the sunspot number and area distributions tend to be located within the forward belts close to their poleward shearing borders. A possible geometry of the magnetic and velocity field interacion is proposed. Keywords. Torsional wave, sunspots 1. Introduction The torsional oscillation was firstly reported by Howard and LaBonte 1980 as a travelling wave pattern superposed on the differential rotation. At the beginning the similarity of the equatorward migration of these belts and the butterfly diagram was very remarkable and inspiring, Labonte and Howard (1982) already provided a comparison of the belts and the latitudinal distribution of the emerging magnetic field by using magnetograms. Snodgrass (1987a, 1987b), Wilson (1987), Snodgrass and Wilson (1987) presented arguments that the torsional pattern is related to large convection cells. Subsurface measurements were reported by Kosovichev and Schou (1997) and Schou et al. (1998), Howe et al., (2000a) published results of GONG and MDI subsurface measurements and reported torsional pattern down to about 0.92 R, this was confirmed by Komm et al. (2001) and Antia and Basu (2001). The torsional oscillation can be regarded to be a persistent feature extending down to about 0.92 R. The early models followed global approach, the works of Yoshimura (1981) and Schüssler (1981) were based on the Lorentz force. Later models followed local treatment. Küker et al. (1996) considered magnetic quenching of Reynolds stresses modifying the differential rotation profile. In the model of Petrovay and Forgács-Dajka (2002) the sunspots modify the turbulent viscosity in the convective zone which leads to the modulation of the differential rotation. The present paper aims at finding any spatial correlation between the torsional wave and any sunspot feature. Earlier works also indicated some spatial connections but only based on magnetograms. LaBonte and Howard (1982) averaged the latitudinal magnetic activity distribution for a longer time, whereas Zhao and Kosovichev (2004) only indicated the location of the activity belt with no distribution information. By using sunspot data, one can study the role of the most intensive magnetic fluxes hopefully leading to an answer for the question: which properties of the magnetic flux ropes could be able to modify the ambient flow resulting in the observed zonal velocity pattern. 394

IAU273: Magnetic fields - Torsional waves 395 Figure 1. The upper panel shows the azimuthal velocity data of Ulrich and Boyden (2005) in black-and-white reproduction along with additionally inserted borderlines of the prograde belts. These borderlines are also inserted into the rest of the panels. The second and third panels show the distributions of the number and the area of spot groups. The fourth and fifth panels show the mean number of spots in the groups and the mean area of groups. 2. Observational material and method of analysing The aim is to follow the temporal variation of the latitudinal distribution of sunspot parameters in comparison with the migration of the torsional waves. Four parameters were considered: the number and the total area of sunspots as well as the mean number of spots in groups and the mean area of groups. These latter two parameters can characterise the complexity of the sunspot groups to check the assumption that larger clusters of flux ropes can modify more efficiently the ambient velocity fields. The sunspot data were taken from the most detailed sunspot database, the Debrecen Photoheliographic Data (DPD, Győri et al. 2010). The present study analyses the years 1986-2002. The latitudinal distributions were determined in such a way that latitudinal

396 Judit Muraközy & András Ludmány stripes of one degree were considered, and all applied sunspot parameters were summed up for all stripes on a three-monthly basis. To compare the obtained distributions with the torsional pattern one has to determine the latitudinal location of the torsional wave i.e. the latitudes of fast/slow belts and the shearing zones. The torsional data were taken from the paper of Ulrich and Boyden (2005), Figure 1. shows these data for the period 1986-2002. Since fractal-like distributions cannot be compared directly we inserted curves on the shear zones indicating the prograde belts and the same curves were inserted in the four panels of sunspot distributions. The number and the total area of sunspot groups are plotted in the 2-3 panels, the areas are taken into account at the time of the largest extension of the groups. The mean number of spots within the groups as well as the mean area of spot groups are plotted in panels 4 and 5. These last two features characterize the significance of the groups, their size and complexity. They are used to check the assumption that larger and more complex flux rope systems might influence the ambient flows more efficiently and this could be the reason of the torsional pattern (Petrovay, 2002). Figure 2. Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism in the northern hemisphere. Left: view from outside, right: view in the meridional plane from west. 3. Possible scenario of a flow system The panels do not support the assumption that the torsional belts are caused by the sunspots themselves because the onset of the belts precedes the appearance of the first spot in the new cycles and the complexity of spot groups does not seem to play any role, at least in the present representation of spot group complexity. The following properties of the distributions are conspicuous: 1. The line of weight of the area occupied by sunspots is located on the borderline between the prograde and the poleward retrograde belts. 2. The equatorward borderline of the prograde belt is a definite borderline of the sunspot occurrence (see the second panel of Fig. 1).

IAU273: Magnetic fields - Torsional waves 397 Figure 3. Internal torsional belts between 1996-1999 reported by Howe et al. (2000) in black-and-white reproduction. The borderlines of Fig. 1 are also inserted. The second feature may be a signature of certain internal streams, it seems to allow the following interpretation. The cluster of toroidal magnetic field ropes may be present in the convective zone up to a certain height and may act as an obstacle for the emerging material. Out of this region (poleward and equatorward from the toroidal belt) the uprising streams may be stronger than above the torus and they turn around the obstacle, the torus. Above the torus these turning around streams flow equatorward in the poleward half of the toroidal belt and they flow poleward in the equatorward half. The former flow is then oriented eastward and the latter one westward due to the Coriolis force, these produce the retrograde/prograde belts, see Fig. 2. The inward motion at active regions has been observed by Zhao and Kosovichev (2004). This mechanism avoids the problem of the apparent violation of causality arising in models based on sunspots. In this model the source region of the sunspots, i.e. the toroidal field is the cause of the torsional pattern which is present prior to the emergence of the first sunspot in a cycle. This restricts the onset of the belts to middle latitudes. If this scenario is correct it may have implications for the depth of the toroidal field rope clusters. Howe et al. (2000) reported internal torsional patterns and found that the

398 Judit Muraközy & András Ludmány belts get disintegrated at a depth of about 0.92. This may mean that this is the depth of the outermost toroidal field rope clusters above which the torsional belts can be formed. Acknowledgements The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No. 218816. References Antia, H. M. & Basu, S. 2001, Astrophys. J., 559, L67 Győri, L., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A. et al. 2010 Debrecen Photoheliographic Data http://fenyi.solarobs.unideb.hu/dpd/index.html Howard, R. & LaBonte, B. J. 2005, Astrophys. J., 239, L33 Howe, R., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Hill, et al. 2000, Astrophys. J., 533, L163 Komm R. W., Hill F., & Howe R. 2001, Astrophys. J., 558, 428 Kosovichev, A. G. & Schou, J., 1997, Astrophys. J., 482 L207 Küker, M., Rüdiger, G., & Pipin, V. V. 2005, Astron. Astrophys, 312, 615 LaBonte, B. J. & Howard, R. 1982, Solar Phys., 75, 161 Petrovay, K., Forgács - Dajka E. 2002, Solar Phys., 205, 39 Schou, J., Antia, H. M., & Basu, S., et al. 1998, Astrophys. J., 505, 390 Schüssler, M. 1981, Astron. Astrophys, 94, L17 Ulrich R. K. & Boyden, J. E. 2005, Astrophys. J., 620, L123 Yoshimura, H. 1981, Astrophys. J., 247, 1102 Zhao, J. & Kosovichev, A. G. 2004, Astrophys. J., 603, 776