Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Similar documents
Application and verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Serbia

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products: 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2013

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2014

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Verification of ECMWF products at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

ECMWF products to represent, quantify and communicate forecast uncertainty

Five years of limited-area ensemble activities at ARPA-SIM: the COSMO-LEPS system

Road Weather Modelling System: Verification for Road Weather Season

EWGLAM/SRNWP National presentation from DMI

Technical Report Road Weather Modelling System: Verification for Road Weather Season. Claus Petersen, Alexander Mahura, Bent Sass

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2018

Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2006

Developments towards multi-model based forecast product generation

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

ECMWF product development

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute

A review on recent progresses of THORPEX activities in JMA

Assessment of Ensemble Forecasts

High resolution regional reanalysis over Ireland using the HARMONIE NWP model

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

The Hungarian Meteorological Service has made

Calibration of ECMWF forecasts

Operational and research activities at ECMWF now and in the future

Quarterly numerical weather prediction model performance summaries April to June 2010 and July to September 2010

István Ihász, Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

Road Weather Modelling System: Verification for Road Weather Season

Severe weather warnings at the Hungarian Meteorological Service: Developments and progress

Current best practice of uncertainty forecast for wind energy

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Descripiton of method used for wind estimates in StormGeo

Allison Monarski, University of Maryland Masters Scholarly Paper, December 6, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

Nowcasting for the London Olympics 2012 Brian Golding, Susan Ballard, Nigel Roberts & Ken Mylne Met Office, UK. Crown copyright Met Office

Extracting probabilistic severe weather guidance from convection-allowing model forecasts. Ryan Sobash 4 December 2009 Convection/NWP Seminar Series

Verification and performance measures of Meteorological Services to Air Traffic Management (MSTA)

State of the art of wind forecasting and planned improvements for NWP Helmut Frank (DWD), Malte Mülller (met.no), Clive Wilson (UKMO)

REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL PROJECT

Use and impact of ATOVS in the DMI-HIRLAM regional weather model

Convective-scale NWP for Singapore

Drought forecasting methods Blaz Kurnik DESERT Action JRC

Claus Petersen* and Bent H. Sass* Danish Meteorological Institute Copenhagen, Denmark

Statistical interpretation of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) output

LAMEPS activities at the Hungarian Meteorological Service. Hungarian Meteorological Service

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007

Adaptation for global application of calibration and downscaling methods of medium range ensemble weather forecasts

Tangent-linear and adjoint models in data assimilation

The Impact of Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble Size on Probabilistic Forecasts of Precipitation by the ECMWF EPS

Forecasting Extreme Events

ECMWF 10 th workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems

Estimation of Forecat uncertainty with graphical products. Karyne Viard, Christian Viel, François Vinit, Jacques Richon, Nicole Girardot

Developing Operational MME Forecasts for Subseasonal Timescales

Exploiting ensemble members: forecaster-driven EPS applications at the met office

Model Output Statistics (MOS)

Probabilistic weather hazard forecast guidance for transoceanic flights based on merged global ensemble forecasts

Ocean and sea ice modeling for Arctic shipping

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2016

Weather Analysis and Forecasting

4.3.2 Configuration. 4.3 Ensemble Prediction System Introduction

COntinuous Mesoscale Ensemble Prediction DMI. Henrik Feddersen, Xiaohua Yang, Kai Sattler, Bent Hansen Sass

TCC Recent Development and Activity

MAP Re-Analysis with IFS/ARPEGE/ALADIN

At the start of the talk will be a trivia question. Be prepared to write your answer.

Strategic Radar Enhancement Project (SREP) Forecast Demonstration Project (FDP) The future is here and now

Status of the SRNWP-EPS II Project

Use of NWP and EPS Products in support of Location-specific Forecasts

How ECMWF has addressed requests from the data users

Current Issues and Challenges in Ensemble Forecasting

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. June 22, 2018 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

Seasonal Hydrometeorological Ensemble Prediction System: Forecast of Irrigation Potentials in Denmark

Transcription:

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 Danish Meteorological Institute Author: Søren E. Olufsen, Deputy Director of Forecasting Services Department and Erik Hansen, forecaster M.Sc. 1. Summary of major highlights The ECMWF deterministic forecasts are used extensively by the duty forecasters and also to produce a wide range of automatic forecasts. The ocean model is primarily used by the Danish Maritime Service, one of the largest ship routing services in Europe. The information on the DMI website http://www.dmi.dk has been improved in geography as well as in time. Information in graphical format is now given for any city or town which has its own zip code. This is true for 536 places in Denmark. The information contains forecasts for the next 48 hours taken from HIRLAM and forecasts for day 3 through 9 based on ECMWF deterministic forecast. 3-9 day forecast for Copenhagen taken from www.dmi.dk Last but not least probabilistic forecasts for day 10 to 14 based on ECMWF EPS system. Forecasts are given with probabilities for the 3 most likely scenarios based on the combined forecasted temperatures, wind, cloud amount and precipitation from a group of ensemble members with similar forecast values. These forecasts were introduced in this form in 2008 and have been well received by the public, who apparently understands that the probabilities will not sum up to 100%. 1

EPS forecast for Copenhagen 2. Use and application of products Includes medium-range deterministic and ensemble forecasts, monthly forecast and seasonal forecast A seasonal forecast for the 2m temperature for the Danish area of interest is displayed at our website www.dmi.dk. Anomaly chart for the 2m temperature for Denmark and Northwestern Europe for July, August and September 2009 As the anomaly map at dmi.dk are based on a 30-years climate normal adapted from 1961-90, the DMI seasonal map differs slightly from the ECMWF presentation, which is based on a 30-years running mean. The seasonal forecast does get a lot of media attention during the spring. 2

The EPS output is used for a five days extension of our automatically generated deterministic forecasts on day 10-14. We also provide a 30-days probability forecast for the 2m temperature for commercial supply companies. Last the EPS products are used as general guidelines for the confidence of the regular day 1-7 forecast. Given certain criteria are fulfilled a message is generated to the forecasters containing the highest winds, highest and lowest temperatures, the highest amounts of precipitation forecasted by EPS for a number of Danish locations. Included in the guidance message is the numbers of the ensemble members forecasting the extreme values. 2.1 Post-processing of model output 2.1.1 Statistical adaptation Not used in any products. All filtering has been removed in 2008. There are several reasons for this. First the quality of the models has been improved to a level where adaptation to surface observations is no more required. Secondly this gives a faster and smoother after treatment of data for our automatic products. The last reason is greater flexibility of our automatic products, as we have become independent of surface observations. 2.1.2 Physical adaptation Including limited-area models, hydrological models, dispersion models etc. using ECMWF model data as input The Hirlam model has been upgraded in 2009. The suite consists of 3 different resolutions. ECMWF is used as boundary conditions for the 15 km model, which provides boundary conditions for the nested high resolution models. As an important element of the Danish disaster preparedness setup the weather service are able to make a trajectory calculation of pollutants based on ECMWF data. 2.1.3 Derived fields None. 2.2 Use of products Use of ECMWF products in operational duties, in particular in severe weather situations The ECMWF medium range products including the EPS are extensively used as one of the primary sources of information in the public weather service. Also our commercial service is highly dependent on both the deterministic forecast worldwide as well as the quality of the ECMWF WAM model. The forecasters of the DMI Maritime Service are using the EC-models worldwide in order to produce forecasts and provide commercial ships with routeing advices. The onboard systems of the costumers of Maritime Service are supported with ECMWF GRIB data. In potential severe weather situations the preferred models are the high resolution DMI-HIRLAM models, the DMI-WAM model and our 3-D seamodel BSH-cmod. As the in-house models are our primary tools in severe weather situation we have not really any experience with the EFI-index, but the deterministic model is quite usable. 3. Verification of products Include medium-range deterministic and ensemble forecasts, monthly forecast, seasonal forecast. ECMWF does extensive verification of its products in the free atmosphere. However, verification of surface parameters is in general limited to using synoptic observations. More detailed verification of weather parameters by national Services is particularly valuable. 3.1 Objective verification 3.1.1 Direct ECMWF model output (both deterministic and EPS) Focus on local weather parameters verified for locations which are of interest to your service The direct ECMWF model output is verified against observations for day 0, 3 and 5 which is corresponding to forecast lengths of +12hrs, +84hrs and +132hrs. We are making a monthly verification of max- and minimum temperatures. The observed maximum temperature over Denmark is estimated as the 80% quantile of all synoptic observations of the maximum temperature. This technique filters errors and outliers and provides some representative extreme values. 3

EC 1st qtr. 09 day(0) day(3) day(5) EC 1st qtr. HR 2 (%) 86 77 78 Bias -1,0-1,0-0,5 HR 4 (%) 100 98 98 MAE 1,1 1,1 1,2 obs-ec(0) obs-ec(3) obs-ec(5) Table 1: Tmax 1st quarter Hit Rate calculated for +/- 2 degrees for ecmwf direct output against observations (left). Right table shows bias and Mean Absolute Error Table 1 (left) shows an almost perfect Hit Rate for +/- 4 degrees and fine scores for +/-2 degrees as well. The right yellow table shows a slightly negative bias for the maximum temperature. This might be caused by the verification methods as the most extreme values are filtered by the 80% quantile approach. EC 1st qtr. 09 day(0) day(3) day(5) EC 1st qtr. HR 2 (%) 53 44 41 Bias -2,6-2,7-3,0 HR 4 (%) 69 75 65 MAE 2,8 2,9 3,7 obs-ec(0) obs-ec(3) obs-ec(5) Table 2: Tmin 1st quarter. Hit Rate calculated for +/- 2 degrees for ecmwf direct output against observations (left). Right table shows bias and Mean Absolute Error Table 2 (left) displays the performance of the model estimation of the wintertime minimum temperature over Denmark. There is so to speak confidence in a +/- 4 degrees prognosis but especially the Hit Rates for the +/-2 degree interval could be improved further. The right blue table shows a negative bias for the minimum temperature which in general can be interpreted as too warm model temperature during the Danish winter nights. We have worked on a verification method of the forecasted total cloud fraction against automatic synoptic observations based on LIDAR ceilometers. However the project suffered from a general limitation of the quality of cloud fraction observations. The observed cloud fraction of convective clouds showed a high dependency of the wind velocity and we also had problems with proper observations of high semitransparent cirrus, so the project was dropped. 3.1.2 ECMWF model output compared to other NWP models Comparison of performance of ECMWF model to other NWP models used by your service 4

Standard deviation (upper curves) and bias (lower curves) for EC, DMI-HIRLAM T15, UKM and T1B (DMI-HIRLAM test version) for various parameters 5

Verification for 1st quarter 2009 for surface parameters (left) and upper atmospheric values (right) for DMI- HIRLAM T15, ECMWF (ECH) and UKMO (UKL) against Ewglam station list. The included prognosis for T15 and UKL is with initial time 00UTC, 06UTC, 12UTC and 18UTC. For ECMWF the included prognosis is with initial time 00UTC and 12UTC. The upper curves show the standard deviation and the lower curves show the bias. The ECMWF outperforms the other models in the upper atmosphere and for the surface pressure bus scores (not surprisingly) slightly below the high-resolution models for the 2m temperature and the 10m wind. 3.1.3 Post-processed products e.g. Kalman filtered products, calibrated EPS probabilities, etc. Filtering and statistical after treatment is not used in any products. 3.1.4 End products delivered to users 3.2 Subjective verification 3.2.1 Subjective scores (including evaluation of confidence indices when available) In 2008 we conducted a survey of user satisfaction with our maritime forecasts for the Danish Waters, including short- and medium range forecasts. The survey was conducted on our website and the result was that 80 % of the users were very satisfied with the quality of the forecasts while 16 % was quite pleased. Only 4 % were not satisfied.. This was our only subjective survey last year. 3.2.2 Synoptic studies Including evaluation of the behaviour of the model Since the introduction of the T35R1 cycle there has been an over forecasting of convective precipitation on a small scale. This occurs especially in weak convective situations where a few grid points show a tiny amount of precipitation. The forecasters estimate that a slight under forecasting of showers has turned into a weak over forecasting. The cloud prognosis is very good but has a weak point in the representation of low clouds. 4. References to relevant publications None. 6