Some Inequalities variations on a common theme Lecture I, UL 2007

Similar documents
5.1-The Initial-Value Problems For Ordinary Differential Equations

Contraction Mapping Principle Approach to Differential Equations

Minimum Squared Error

MTH 146 Class 11 Notes

Minimum Squared Error

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 3. Chapter 1

The solution is often represented as a vector: 2xI + 4X2 + 2X3 + 4X4 + 2X5 = 4 2xI + 4X2 + 3X3 + 3X4 + 3X5 = 4. 3xI + 6X2 + 6X3 + 3X4 + 6X5 = 6.

EXERCISE - 01 CHECK YOUR GRASP

Mathematics 805 Final Examination Answers

Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for convex functions via fractional integrals

ENGR 1990 Engineering Mathematics The Integral of a Function as a Function

e t dt e t dt = lim e t dt T (1 e T ) = 1

Motion. Part 2: Constant Acceleration. Acceleration. October Lab Physics. Ms. Levine 1. Acceleration. Acceleration. Units for Acceleration.

0 for t < 0 1 for t > 0

GENERALIZATION OF SOME INEQUALITIES VIA RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE FRACTIONAL CALCULUS

4.8 Improper Integrals

A Simple Method to Solve Quartic Equations. Key words: Polynomials, Quartics, Equations of the Fourth Degree INTRODUCTION

September 20 Homework Solutions

Average & instantaneous velocity and acceleration Motion with constant acceleration

PARABOLA. moves such that PM. = e (constant > 0) (eccentricity) then locus of P is called a conic. or conic section.

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( y )

Solutions from Chapter 9.1 and 9.2

Green s Functions and Comparison Theorems for Differential Equations on Measure Chains

A LIMIT-POINT CRITERION FOR A SECOND-ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR IAN KNOWLES

INTEGRALS. Exercise 1. Let f : [a, b] R be bounded, and let P and Q be partitions of [a, b]. Prove that if P Q then U(P ) U(Q) and L(P ) L(Q).

EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS FOR A SECOND-ORDER ITERATIVE BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM

3. Renewal Limit Theorems

Convergence of Singular Integral Operators in Weighted Lebesgue Spaces

f t f a f x dx By Lin McMullin f x dx= f b f a. 2

ON NEW INEQUALITIES OF SIMPSON S TYPE FOR FUNCTIONS WHOSE SECOND DERIVATIVES ABSOLUTE VALUES ARE CONVEX

P441 Analytical Mechanics - I. Coupled Oscillators. c Alex R. Dzierba

3 Motion with constant acceleration: Linear and projectile motion

Forms of Energy. Mass = Energy. Page 1. SPH4U: Introduction to Work. Work & Energy. Particle Physics:

Predator - Prey Model Trajectories and the nonlinear conservation law

New Inequalities in Fractional Integrals

Chapter Direct Method of Interpolation

white strictly far ) fnf regular [ with f fcs)8( hs ) as function Preliminary question jointly speaking does not exist! Brownian : APA Lecture 1.

Magnetostatics Bar Magnet. Magnetostatics Oersted s Experiment

Lecture notes. Fundamental inequalities: techniques and applications

CALDERON S REPRODUCING FORMULA FOR DUNKL CONVOLUTION

Chapter 2. First Order Scalar Equations

f(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all

Available Online :

MATH1050 Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality and Triangle Inequality

Think of the Relationship Between Time and Space Again

Convex Sets and Functions

3D Transformations. Computer Graphics COMP 770 (236) Spring Instructor: Brandon Lloyd 1/26/07 1

ON NEW INEQUALITIES OF SIMPSON S TYPE FOR FUNCTIONS WHOSE SECOND DERIVATIVES ABSOLUTE VALUES ARE CONVEX.

CBSE 2014 ANNUAL EXAMINATION ALL INDIA

MATH 124 AND 125 FINAL EXAM REVIEW PACKET (Revised spring 2008)

Physics 2A HW #3 Solutions

Two Coupled Oscillators / Normal Modes

MA 214 Calculus IV (Spring 2016) Section 2. Homework Assignment 1 Solutions

22.615, MHD Theory of Fusion Systems Prof. Freidberg Lecture 9: The High Beta Tokamak

1.0 Electrical Systems

FM Applications of Integration 1.Centroid of Area

Y 0.4Y 0.45Y Y to a proper ARMA specification.

A Kalman filtering simulation

Lecture 3. Limits of Functions and Continuity

How to Prove the Riemann Hypothesis Author: Fayez Fok Al Adeh.

1. Find a basis for the row space of each of the following matrices. Your basis should consist of rows of the original matrix.

ON THE OSTROWSKI-GRÜSS TYPE INEQUALITY FOR TWICE DIFFERENTIABLE FUNCTIONS

1. Introduction. 1 b b

Math 2142 Exam 1 Review Problems. x 2 + f (0) 3! for the 3rd Taylor polynomial at x = 0. To calculate the various quantities:

How to prove the Riemann Hypothesis

Hamilton- J acobi Equation: Explicit Formulas In this lecture we try to apply the method of characteristics to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation: u t

Appendix to Notes 8 (a)

PHYSICS 1210 Exam 1 University of Wyoming 14 February points

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

23.5. Half-Range Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

1 1 + x 2 dx. tan 1 (2) = ] ] x 3. Solution: Recall that the given integral is improper because. x 3. 1 x 3. dx = lim dx.

An integral having either an infinite limit of integration or an unbounded integrand is called improper. Here are two examples.

ANSWERS TO EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 2

On Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for Caputo k-fractional derivatives

Hamilton- J acobi Equation: Weak S olution We continue the study of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation:

Stochastic models and their distributions

Announcements: Warm-up Exercise:

An Introduction to Malliavin calculus and its applications

We just finished the Erdős-Stone Theorem, and ex(n, F ) (1 1/(χ(F ) 1)) ( n

Physic 231 Lecture 4. Mi it ftd l t. Main points of today s lecture: Example: addition of velocities Trajectories of objects in 2 = =

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 28: Inner product spaces.

[5] Solving Multiple Linear Equations A system of m linear equations and n unknown variables:

A REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H. Thomas Shores Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Spring 2007

(b) 10 yr. (b) 13 m. 1.6 m s, m s m s (c) 13.1 s. 32. (a) 20.0 s (b) No, the minimum distance to stop = 1.00 km. 1.

Inventory Analysis and Management. Multi-Period Stochastic Models: Optimality of (s, S) Policy for K-Convex Objective Functions

Matrix Algebra. Matrix Addition, Scalar Multiplication and Transposition. Linear Algebra I 24

Chapter 2 Summary. Carnegie Learning

Lesson Notes: Week 40-Vectors

Analytical Methods Exam: Preparatory Exercises

10 Vector Integral Calculus

14. The fundamental theorem of the calculus

Some estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions

dy dx = xey (a) y(0) = 2 (b) y(1) = 2.5 SOLUTION: See next page

Chapter 3. Vector Spaces

Solutions to Problems from Chapter 2

Transformations. Ordered set of numbers: (1,2,3,4) Example: (x,y,z) coordinates of pt in space. Vectors

Exercises: Similarity Transformation

Application on Inner Product Space with. Fixed Point Theorem in Probabilistic

t is a basis for the solution space to this system, then the matrix having these solutions as columns, t x 1 t, x 2 t,... x n t x 2 t...

Math 426: Probability Final Exam Practice

Transcription:

Some Inequliies vriions on common heme Lecure I, UL 2007 Finbrr Hollnd, Deprmen of Mhemics, Universiy College Cork, fhollnd@uccie; July 2, 2007 Three Problems Problem Assume i, b i, c i, i =, 2, 3 re rel numbers Prove h ( + b + c ) 2 + ( 2 + b 2 + c 2 ) 2 + ( 3 + b 3 + c 3 ) 2 2 + b 2 + c 2 + 2 2 + b 2 2 + c 2 2+ 2 3 + b 2 3 + c 2 3 Problem 2 Assume i, b i, c i, i =, 2, 3 re posiive numbers Prove h 3 b c + 3 2 b 2 c 2 + 3 3 b 3 c 3 3 ( + 2 + 3 )(b + b 2 + b 3 )(c + c 2 + c 3 ), b = 2 b 2 = 3 b 3 Problem 3 Assume i, b i, c i, i =, 2, 3 re posiive numbers Prove h + b + + c 2 + b 2 + + c 2 3 + b 3 + c 3, + 2 + 3 + b +b 2 +b 3 + c +c 2 +c 3 b = 2 b 2 = 3 b 3 2 A bsic inequliy Theorem Suppose, b > 0 Then 2 b + b, > 0,

In oher words, 2 b = min{ + b = b : > 0} = min{s + b : s, > 0, s = } Proof + b 2 b = 2 2 b + b We deduce some consequences Theorem 2 If, b, c, d > 0 Then b + cd ( + c)(b + d), Proof For ll > 0, Hence c = b d 2[ b + cd] + b + c + d = 2[ b + cd] min{( + c) + We cn build on his in wo wys b d b + d = c = + c (b + d) = ( b) 2 (b + d) = ( + c) +, : > 0} = 2 ( + c)(b + d) Theorem 3 Suppose, b, c, d, e, f, g, h > 0 Then 4 bcd + 4 efgh 4 ( + e)(b + f)(c + g)(d + h), e = b f = c g = d h Proof Pu x = b, y = cd, u = ef, v = gh Then 4 bcd + 4 efgh = xy + uv We cn now deduce he following semen (x + u)(y + v) = ( b + ef)( cd + gh) ( + e)(b + f) c + g)(d + h) = 4 ( + e)(b + f)(c + g)(d + h) 2

Corollry If, b, c, e, f, g > 0, hen 3 bc + 3 efg 3 ( + e)(b + f)(c + g), e = b f = c g Proof Le d = 3 bc, h = 3 efg nd pply he heorem d + h = 4 bcd + 4 efgh 4 ( + e)(b + f)(c + g)(d + h), whence 3 bc + 3 efg = d + h 3 ( + e)(b + f)(c + g) A soluion of Problem 2 follows Exercise Prove he ls semen Exercise 2 Suppose i, b i > 0, i =, 2,, n Prove h n 2 n + n b b 2 b n n ( + b )( 2 + b 2 ) ( n + b n ), b = 2 b 2 = = n b n 3 The Cuchy-Schwrz inequliy Theorem 2 is specil cse of disguised version of one form of perhps he mos useful inequliy in ll of Mhemics, nmely he Cuchy-Schwrz inequliy Theorem 4 (Cuchy-Schwrz) If x i, y i > 0, i =, 2,, n, hen n n n xi y i ( x i )( y i ), i= i= i= x y = x 2 y 2 = = x n y n Proof Invoke Theorem 2 nd use inducion We cn phrse his differenly Corollry 2 If i, i =, 2,, n re rel numbers, hen n n n 2 i = mx{ i x i : x 2 i = } i= i= i= 3

Proof For, if n i= x2 i =, hen n i x i nd here is equliy when i= = = n i x i i= n (i ) 2 (x i ) 2 i= n n ( 2 i )( x 2 i ) i= i= n 2 i, i= x i = i n, i =, 2,, n i= 2 i Theorem 5 If, b, c, d re rel numbers, hen ( + b)2 + (c + d) 2 2 + c 2 + b 2 + d 2 Proof Suppose x 2 + y 2 = Then Hence x + cy 2 + c 2, bx + dy b 2 + d 2 ( + b)x + (c + d)y x + cy + bx + dy 2 + c 2 + b 2 + d 2 I follows h ( + b)2 + (c + d) 2 = mx{ (+b)x+(c+d)y : x 2 +y 2 = } 2 + c 2 + b 2 + d 2 This is specil cse of Minkowski s inequliy Theorem 6 (Minkowski) Assume i, b i, i =, 2, 3 re rel numbers Then n ( i + b i ) 2 n 2 i + n b 2 i i= i= i= Proof Suppose n i= x2 i = Then n 2 i + n n n b 2 i i x i + b i x i i= i= 4 i= i= n ( i + b i )x i i=

Hence n n ( i + b i ) 2 = mx{ ( i + b i )x i : i= i= n x 2 i = } n 2 i + n b 2 i i= i= i= 4 Discussion of Theorem 2 The produc b represens he re of recngle A wih dimensions, b, nd cd is he re of recngle B wih dimensions c, d And + c, b + d re he dimensions of recngle C he sum of A, B Thus re(a) + re(b) re(c), A, B, C re scled versions of ech oher Exercise 3 Give geomeric inerpreion of Problem 2 We cn cs he previous semen in differen wy Wih ech poin (vecor) x = (x, x 2 ) is he firs qudrn of R 2, le Then, if y = (y, y 2 ), g 2 (x) = x x 2 g 2 (x) + g 2 (y) g 2 (x + y) Thus g 2 is super-ddiive on R 2 Noice, oo, h, for every sclr λ > 0, λx = (λx, λx 2 ) nd g 2 (λx) = λg 2 (x), x R 2, ie, g 2 is homogeneous of degree Hence, g 2 is concve on R 2 Anlyiclly, his mens h x, y R 2, nd 0 λ, hen λg 2 (x) + ( λ)g 2 (y) g 2 (λx + ( λ)y) To ge n ide of wh i mens, geomericlly, ry nd picure he surfce in 3-spce whose equion is z = xy, x, y 0 Exercise 4 Apropos Problem 2, drw similr conclusion bou he funcion g 3 (x) = 3 x x 2 x 3, x = (x, x 2, x 3 ) R 3, x i 0, i =, 2, 3 In fc, if x = (x, x 2,, x n ) is vecor in n-spce nd is coordines re posiive, nd g n (x) = n x x 2 x n, hen g n is super-ddiive nd is homogeneous of degree on Hence, g n is concve on his region {x R n : x i 0, i =, 2,, n} 5

5 Discussion of Theorem 5 I s fmilir h 2 + b 2 is he eucliden disnce from he origin o he poin (, b) in R 2 Thus Theorem 5 is simply n nlyicl semen equivlen o he ringle inequliy! To pu his noher wy, le l 2 (x) = x 2 + x 2 2, x = (x, x 2 ) R 2, hen l 2 (x + y) l 2 (x) + l 2 (y), x, y R 2 In oher words, l 2 is sub-ddiive Bu i s lso homogeneous of degree one Hence, i is convex on R 2, ie, x, y R 2, nd 0 λ, hen l 2 (λx + ( λ)y) λl 2 (x) + ( λ)l 2 (y) To ge n ide of wh his mens, geomericlly, ry nd picure he region of poins (x, y, z) in 3-spce consrined by he condiions 0 z x 2 + y 2, x, y R [Hin: your nex mel exmine he sugr bowl, sy] A soluion of Problem follows once we cn show h l 3 (x) = x 2 + x 2 2 + x 2 3, x = (x, x 2, x 3 ) R 3, hs he sme propery Exercise 5 Esblish h l 3 is sub-ddiive nd convex on R 3, nd solve Problem 6 Soluion of Problem 3 By now i will hve occurred o you h wh is wned o solve Problem 3 is n nlogue of Corollry for he hrmonic men of hree posiive numbers (This hs properies similr o he geomeric men, bu doesn ge s much enion, nd doesn feure in oo mny IMO problems) Nmely, we wn o show h he funcion h 3 defined by 3 h 3 (x) = x + x 2 +, x = (x, x 2, x 3 ) R 3, x, x 2, x 3 > 0 x 3 is super-ddiive, nd so concve, on R 3 Theorem 7 If, b, c > 0, hen + + = min{x + by + cz : 0 < x, y, z, x + y + z = } b c 6

Proof This is consequence of Theorem 4 For, if x, y, z > 0 nd x+ y+ z =, hen Hence, = ( x + by b + cz c ) 2 (x + by + cz)( + b + c ) + + x + by + cz, b c whenever 0 < x, y, z, x + y + z =, nd here is equliy here when x = 2 ( + +, y = b c )2 b 2 ( + +, z = b c )2 c 2 ( + + b c )2 Corollry 3 If, b, c, d, e, f > 0, hen h 3 (, b, c) + h 3 (d, e, f) h 3 ( + d, b + e, c + f) There is equliy iff d = b e = c f Proof For, if x, y, z > 0 nd x + y + z =, hen h 3 (, b, c)+h 3 (d, e, f) 3(x+by+cz)+3(dx+ey+fz) = 3[(+d)x+(b+e)y+(c+f)z], nd so h 3 (, b, c) + h 3 (d, e, f) doesn exceed 3 min{(+d)x+(b+e)y+(c+f)z : 0 < x, y, z, x+ y+ z = } = h 3 (+d, b+e, c+f) Moreover, (?) here is equliy here iff nd x = ( + + ) = d( + + ) = ( + d)( + + ), b c d e f +d b+e c+f y = b( + + ) = e( + + ) = (b + e)( + + ), b c d e f +d b+e c+f z = c( + + ) = f( + + ) = (c + f)( + + ) b c d e f +d b+e c+f In oher words, (?) iff Exercise 6 Now solve Problem 3 d = b e = c f 7

7 Exercises Suppose, b > 0 Prove h = b + g 2 (, b) 2 g 2 (, + b 2 ), 2 Se nd prove n nlogue of Theorem 7 nd is corollry for h 2, where 3 Suppose, b > 0 Prove h 2 h 2 (x) = x +, x = (x, x 2 ) R 2, x i, x 2 > 0 x 2 = b + h 2 (, b) 2 h 2 (, + b 2 ), 4 Suppose, b, c > 0 Prove h g 2 (, b) + g 2 (b, c) + g 2 (c, ) + b + c, = b = c 5 Suppose, b, c > 0 Prove h h 2 (, b) + h 2 (b, c) + h 2 (c, ) + b + c, = b = c 6 Suppose, b, c > 0 Prove h 3 3 bc = min{x + by + cz : 0 < x, y, z, xyz = } Deduce Corollry 7 More generlly, if x i 0, i =, 2,, n, x = (x, x 2,, x n ), nd g n (x) = n x x 2 x n Prove h n ng n (x) = min{ x i y i : y y 2 y n =, y i > 0, i =, 2, n} i= Now redo Exercise 2 in Secion 2 8

8 Suppose, b, c > 0 Prove h = b = c + g 2 (, b) + g 3 (, b, c) 3g 3 (, + b 2, + b + c ), 3 9 Suppose, b, c > 0 Prove h + h 2 (, b) + h 3 (, b, c) 3h 3 (, + b 2, + b + c ), 3 = b = c 0 Suppose, b, c, d > 0 Prove h b + b + + cd c + d + Suppose, b, c > 0 Prove h < ( + c)(b + d) + b + c + d + g 2 (, b) + g 2 (b, c) + g 2 (c, ) 3g 3 ( + b 2, b + c 2, c + 2 ) + b + c, = b = c 2 Suppose, b, c > 0 Prove h h 2 (, b) + h 2 (b, c) + h 2 (c, ) 3h 3 ( + b 2, b + c 2, c + 2 ) + b + c, = b = c 9