Diagrammatic Green s Functions Approach to the Bose-Hubbard Model

Similar documents
Bose-Hubbard Model (BHM) at Finite Temperature

Green s functions: calculation methods

Tuning the Quantum Phase Transition of Bosons in Optical Lattices

A. Field theoretical methods for the partition function, perturbative expansions

Tutorial class 1: Quantization of the harmonic chain 1

where β = 1, H = H µn (3.3) If the Hamiltonian has no explicit time dependence, the Greens functions are homogeneous in time:

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY IN CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS. Wolfgang Belzig

Auxiliary-field Monte Carlo methods in Fock space: sign problems and methods to circumvent them

561 F 2005 Lecture 14 1

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY, GREEN S FUNCTION, AND PERTURBATION THEORY

Filippo Tramonto. Miniworkshop talk: Quantum Monte Carlo simula9ons of low temperature many- body systems

Time Evolving Block Decimation Algorithm

Examination paper for TFY4210 Quantum theory of many-particle systems

9 Making Use of Self-Energy Functionals: The Variational Cluster Approximation

Design and realization of exotic quantum phases in atomic gases

Cluster Extensions to the Dynamical Mean-Field Theory

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.other] 19 Feb 2009

Lecture 1: The Equilibrium Green Function Method

Interaction-induced Symmetry Protected Topological Phase in Harper-Hofstadter models

Quantum Quenches in Extended Systems

Interplay of micromotion and interactions

Quantum quenches in the thermodynamic limit

Finite Temperature Field Theory

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

The nature of superfluidity in the cold atomic unitary Fermi gas

LECTURE 3 WORM ALGORITHM FOR QUANTUM STATISTICAL MODELS

Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclei and cold atoms

Green Functions in Many Body Quantum Mechanics

The Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian

Probing the Optical Conductivity of Harmonically-confined Quantum Gases!

DMFT for correlated bosons and boson-fermion mixtures

The Quantum Theory of Finite-Temperature Fields: An Introduction. Florian Divotgey. Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main

Electronic correlations in models and materials. Jan Kuneš

On the Dirty Boson Problem

Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices

3. Greens functions. H = H 0 + V t. V t = ˆBF t. e βh. ρ 0 ρ t. 3.1 Introduction

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory

Static and dynamic variational principles for strongly correlated electron systems

The bosonic Kondo effect:

The Mott Metal-Insulator Transition

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Diagrammatic Monte Carlo methods for Fermions

with ultracold atoms in optical lattices

Andreas Kreisel. Institut für Theoretische Physik Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main. July,

10 Thermal field theory

Finite-temperature Field Theory

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 24 Feb 2006

Functional renormalization for ultracold quantum gases

6. Auxiliary field continuous time quantum Monte Carlo

Lecture 20: Effective field theory for the Bose- Hubbard model

Self-consistent Conserving Approximations and Renormalization in Quantum Field Theory at Finite Temperature

Billiard ball model for structure factor in 1-D Heisenberg anti-ferromagnets

Quantum Phase Transitions

February 15, Kalani Hettiarachchi. Collaborators: Valy Rousseau Ka-Ming Tam Juana Moreno Mark Jarrell

Introduction to DMFT

Lecture 6: Fluctuation-Dissipation theorem and introduction to systems of interest

The properties of an ideal Fermi gas are strongly determined by the Pauli principle. We shall consider the limit:

Renormalization of microscopic Hamiltonians. Renormalization Group without Field Theory

Magnetism and Superconductivity on Depleted Lattices

Lecture 11: Long-wavelength expansion in the Neel state Energetic terms

Euclidean path integral formalism: from quantum mechanics to quantum field theory

Adiabatic particle pumping and anomalous velocity

Part III: Impurities in Luttinger liquids

Superfluid vortex with Mott insulating core

Tackling the Sign Problem of Ultracold Fermi Gases with Mass-Imbalance

Preface Introduction to the electron liquid

Diagrammatic Monte Carlo simulation of quantum impurity models

Classical Monte Carlo Simulations

Magnetism and Superconductivity in Decorated Lattices

Thermal Quantum Field Theory in Real and Imaginary Time. Daniele Teresi

Introduction to Recent Developments on p-band Physics in Optical Lattices

We already came across a form of indistinguishably in the canonical partition function: V N Q =

From Gutzwiller Wave Functions to Dynamical Mean-Field Theory

Spin liquid phases in strongly correlated lattice models

Superfluidity near the Mott transition of cold bosonic atoms: validating a quantum simulator

Quark Gluon Plasma thermodynamics

Finite temperature QFT: A dual path integral representation

Mean-field theory for extended Bose-Hubbard model with hard-core bosons. Mathias May, Nicolas Gheeraert, Shai Chester, Sebastian Eggert, Axel Pelster

A Brief Introduction to Linear Response Theory with Examples in Electromagnetic Response

Théorie de la Matière Condensée Cours & 16 /09/2013 : Transition Superfluide Isolant de Mott et Modèle de Hubbard bosonique "

Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo methods in heavy nuclei

Nonlinear BEC Dynamics by Harmonic Modulation of s-wave Scattering Length

Andrea Marini. Introduction to the Many-Body problem (I): the diagrammatic approach

Statistical properties of nuclei by the shell model Monte Carlo method

Is a system of fermions in the crossover BCS-BEC. BEC regime a new type of superfluid?

Quantum Many-Body Phenomena in Arrays of Coupled Cavities

Green's Function in. Condensed Matter Physics. Wang Huaiyu. Alpha Science International Ltd. SCIENCE PRESS 2 Beijing \S7 Oxford, U.K.

Second Lecture: Quantum Monte Carlo Techniques

Quantum Phases in Bose-Hubbard Models with Spin-orbit Interactions

Non-Perturbative QCD at Finite Temperature

Ground-state properties, excitations, and response of the 2D Fermi gas

ɛ(k) = h2 k 2 2m, k F = (3π 2 n) 1/3

Relativistic Dirac fermions on one-dimensional lattice

Dynamical mean field approach to correlated lattice systems in and out of equilibrium

Numerical Studies of Correlated Lattice Systems in One and Two Dimensions

Bogoliubov theory of disordered Bose-Einstein condensates

Electrons in a periodic potential

Monday, April 13. Today: equation of motion method (EOM) Dyson equation and Self-energy. Many-Body Green s Functions

Theory of Many-Particle Systems

7 Monte Carlo Simulations of Quantum Spin Models

Transcription:

Diagrammatic Green s Functions Approach to the Bose-Hubbard Model Matthias Ohliger Institut für Theoretische Physik Freie Universität Berlin 22nd of January 2008

Content OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Introduction Experimental realization Bose-Hubbard model Motivation

Content OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Introduction Experimental realization Bose-Hubbard model Motivation Imaginary-time Green s functions Hopping expansion Cumulant decomposition Diagrammatic rules

Content OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Introduction Experimental realization Bose-Hubbard model Motivation Imaginary-time Green s functions Hopping expansion Cumulant decomposition Diagrammatic rules Time-of-flight

Content OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Introduction Experimental realization Bose-Hubbard model Motivation Imaginary-time Green s functions Hopping expansion Cumulant decomposition Diagrammatic rules Time-of-flight Phase diagram Resummation Results and comparison with QMC

Content OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Introduction Experimental realization Bose-Hubbard model Motivation Imaginary-time Green s functions Hopping expansion Cumulant decomposition Diagrammatic rules Time-of-flight Phase diagram Resummation Results and comparison with QMC Excitation spectrum

Content OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Introduction Experimental realization Bose-Hubbard model Motivation Imaginary-time Green s functions Hopping expansion Cumulant decomposition Diagrammatic rules Time-of-flight Phase diagram Resummation Results and comparison with QMC Excitation spectrum Summary and outlook

Experimental realization OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Optical lattice produced by counter-propagating lasers V sin 2 (2πx/λ) Relative strength of hopping and interaction controllable (Quasi) one-, two-, and three-dimensional configurations possible 2 1.5 1 0.5 0-2 -1 0 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2

Bose-Hubbard model OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian: Ĥ BHM =Ĥ 0 + Ĥ 1 Ĥ 0 = [ ] U 2 ˆn i(ˆn i 1) µˆn i i Ĥ 1 = J <i,j> â iâj = i,j J i,j â iâj ˆn i =â iâi { J if i,j nearest neighbors J ij = 0 otherwise

Bose-Hubbard model OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian: Ĥ BHM =Ĥ 0 + Ĥ 1 Ĥ 0 = [ ] U 2 ˆn i(ˆn i 1) µˆn i i Ĥ 1 = J <i,j> â iâj = i,j J i,j â iâj Ĥ 0 site-diagonal: Ĥ 0 n = N S E n n ˆn i =â iâi { J if i,j nearest neighbors J ij = 0 otherwise E n = U n(n 1) µn 2 Perturbative expansion in Ĥ 1

Motivation OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Green s functions contain many important information about the system: Quantum phase diagram Time-of-flight pictures Excitation spectra Thermodynamic properties

Motivation OVERVIEW CONSIDERED SYSTEM BASIC IDEA Green s functions contain many important information about the system: Quantum phase diagram Time-of-flight pictures Excitation spectra Thermodynamic properties Motivated by: F. Nogueira s Primer to the Bose-Hubbard model Diagrammatic calculations for Fermions by W. Metzner, PRB 43, 8549 (1993)

Imaginary-time Green s function IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Definition: G 1 (τ,j τ,j) = 1 Z Tr {e βĥ ˆT with Z = Tr{e βĥ } Heisenberg operators in imaginary time ( = 1): Ô H (τ) = eĥτ Ôe Ĥτ [ ]} â j,h (τ)â j,h (τ )

Dirac interaction picture IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Time evolution of operators determined only by Ĥ 0 : Ô D (τ) = eĥ0τ Ôe Ĥ 0 τ Dirac time evolution operator calculated by Dyson series: Û D (τ,τ 0 ) = τ ( 1) n n=0 = ˆTexp ( τn 1 dτ 1... dτ n Ĥ 1D (τ 1 )... Ĥ 1D (τ n ) τ 0 τ 0 ) dτ 1 Ĥ 1D (τ 1 ) τ 0 τ

Partition function IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Full partition function: Z = Tr { } e βĥ 0 Û D (β,0)

Partition function IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Full partition function: nth order contibution: Z (n) = 1 n! Z(0) Z = Tr i 1,j 1,...,i n,j n J i1j 1... J inj n { } e βĥ 0 Û D (β,0) β Unperturbed n-particle Green s function: 0 dτ 1 β 0 β dτ 2... dτ n 0 G (0) n (τ 1, j 1 ;...;τ n, j n τ 1, i 1 ;...;τ n, i n ) (0) G (0) n (τ 1, i 1 ;...;τ n, i n τ 1, i 1 ;... ; τ n, i n ) = ˆTâ i 1(τ 1 )â i 1 (τ 1 )...â i (τ n n )â i n (τ n )

Cumulant decomposition IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Decompose G (0) n (τ 1,i 1 ;... ;τ n,i n τ 1,i 1 ;... ;τ n,i n ) into simple parts Ĥ 0 not harmonic Wick s theorem not applicable

Cumulant decomposition IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Decompose G (0) n (τ 1,i 1 ;... ;τ n,i n τ 1,i 1 ;... ;τ n,i n ) into simple parts Ĥ 0 not harmonic Wick s theorem not applicable But: Decomposition into cumulants Ĥ 0 site-diagonal cumulants local. Example: G (0) 2 (τ 1, i 1; τ 2, i 2 τ 1, i 1 ; τ 2, i 2 ) = δ i1,i 2 δ i 1,i 2 δ i 1,i 1 C(0) 2 (τ 1, τ 2 τ 1, τ 2 ) + δ i1,i 1 δ i 2,i 2 C(0) 1 (τ 1 τ 1)C (0) 1 (τ 2 τ 2) + δ i1,i 2 δ i 2,i 1 C(0) 1 (τ 2 τ 1)C (0) 1 (τ 1 τ 2)

Cumulant decomposition IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Decompose G (0) n (τ 1,i 1 ;... ;τ n,i n τ 1,i 1 ;... ;τ n,i n ) into simple parts Ĥ 0 not harmonic Wick s theorem not applicable But: Decomposition into cumulants Ĥ 0 site-diagonal cumulants local. Example: G (0) 2 (τ 1, i 1; τ 2, i 2 τ 1, i 1 ; τ 2, i 2 ) = δ i1,i 2 δ i 1,i 2 δ i 1,i 1 C(0) 2 (τ 1, τ 2 τ 1, τ 2 ) + δ i1,i 1 δ i 2,i 2 C(0) 1 (τ 1 τ 1)C (0) 1 (τ 2 τ 2) + δ i1,i 2 δ i 2,i 1 C(0) 1 (τ 2 τ 1)C (0) 1 (τ 1 τ 2) Denote contributions diagrammatically: Points for cumulants, lines for hopping matrix elements Perturbation theory in number of lines

Calculation of cumulants IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Generating functional: ( β C (0) 0 [j, j ] = log ˆTexp dτj (τ)â(τ) + j(τ)â (τ) Cumulants calculated by functional derivatives: C (0) n (τ 1,...,τ n τ 1,..., τ n ) = 0 ) (0) δ 2n δj(τ 1 )...δj(τ n)δj (τ 1 )...δj (τ n ) C(0) 0 [j, j ] j=j =0

Calculation of cumulants IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES One- and two-particle cumulants: C (0) 1 (τ, τ) = ˆTâ (τ )â(τ) (0) = 1 Z (0) = 1 Z (0) n=0 n ˆTâ (τ )â(τ) n e βen n=0 [ Θ(τ τ )(n + 1)e (En En+1)(τ τ ) +Θ(τ τ)ne (En En 1)(τ τ) ] e βen C (0) 2 (τ 1, τ 2 τ 1, τ 2 ) = ˆTâ (τ 1)â (τ 2)â(τ 1 )â(τ 2 ) (0) C (0) 1 (τ 1, τ 1 )C (0) 1 (τ 2, τ 2 ) C (0) 1 (τ 1, τ 2 )C (0) 1 (τ 2, τ 1 )

Diagrammatic rules for Z (n) IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES 1 Draw all possible combinations of vertices with total n entering and n leaving lines 2 Connect them in all possible ways and assign time variables and hopping matrix elements onto the lines 3 Sum over all site indices and integrate all time variables from 0 to β =J ij τ i τ =C (0) 1 (τ τ) =C (0) 2 (τ 1, τ 2 τ 1, τ 2 )

Calculation of free energy IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Grand-canonical free energy: F = 1 β log Z, F(0) = N S β log Z(0), Z (0) = n e βen

Calculation of free energy IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Grand-canonical free energy: F = 1 β log Z, F(0) = N S β log Z(0), Z (0) = n e βen Contains only connected vacuum diagrams

Calculation of free energy IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Grand-canonical free energy: F = 1 β log Z, F(0) = N S β log Z(0), Z (0) = n e βen Contains only connected vacuum diagrams First correction: F (2) = 1 2β i τ 1 τ 2 = N S2DJ 2 UZ (0)2 j = 1 2β n,k β β J i,j J j,i dτ 1 i,j 0 [ ] (n + 1)k n(k + 1) + e β(en+e k) k n + 1 n k + 1 0 dτ 2 C (0) 1 (τ 2 τ 1 )C (0) 1 (τ 1 τ 2 )

IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Diagrammatic rules for Green s functions G 1 (τ, i τ, i) = 1 } {e Z Tr βĥ 0 ˆTâ i (τ )â i (τ)û D (β, 0) G (n) 1 (τ, i τ, i) = Z(0) 1 J i1j Z n! 1... J inj n i 1,j 1,...,i n,j n β 0 β dτ 1... dτ n 0 G (0) n+1 (τ 1, j 1 ;... ; τ n, j n ; τ, i τ 1, i 1 ;... ; τ n, i n, τ, i)

IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Diagrammatic rules for Green s functions G 1 (τ, i τ, i) = 1 } {e Z Tr βĥ 0 ˆTâ i (τ )â i (τ)û D (β, 0) G (n) 1 (τ, i τ, i) = Z(0) 1 J i1j Z n! 1... J inj n i 1,j 1,...,i n,j n β 0 β dτ 1... dτ n 0 G (0) n+1 (τ 1, j 1 ;... ; τ n, j n ; τ, i τ 1, i 1 ;... ; τ n, i n, τ, i) Diagrams have external lines with fixed time and site variables

IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Diagrammatic rules for Green s functions G 1 (τ, i τ, i) = 1 } {e Z Tr βĥ 0 ˆTâ i (τ )â i (τ)û D (β, 0) G (n) 1 (τ, i τ, i) = Z(0) 1 J i1j Z n! 1... J inj n i 1,j 1,...,i n,j n β 0 β dτ 1... dτ n 0 G (0) n+1 (τ 1, j 1 ;... ; τ n, j n ; τ, i τ 1, i 1 ;... ; τ n, i n, τ, i) Diagrams have external lines with fixed time and site variables Disconnected diagrams cancelled by Z (0) /Z

IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Diagrammatic rules for Green s functions G 1 (τ, i τ, i) = 1 } {e Z Tr βĥ 0 ˆTâ i (τ )â i (τ)û D (β, 0) G (n) 1 (τ, i τ, i) = Z(0) 1 J i1j Z n! 1... J inj n i 1,j 1,...,i n,j n β 0 β dτ 1... dτ n 0 G (0) n+1 (τ 1, j 1 ;... ; τ n, j n ; τ, i τ 1, i 1 ;... ; τ n, i n, τ, i) Diagrams have external lines with fixed time and site variables Disconnected diagrams cancelled by Z (0) /Z Zeroth and first order: G (0) 1 (τ, i τ, j) = G (1) 1 (τ, i τ, j) = i τ τ = δ i,jc (0) 1 (τ τ) i j τ τ 1 τ = Jδ d(i,j),1 β 0 dτ 1 C (0) 1 (τ τ 1 )C (0) 1 (τ 1 τ)

Calculations in Matsubara space IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Translational invariance in time suggests Matsubara transform: C (0) 1 (ω m) = 1 [ ] (n + 1) n e βen, ω Z (0) m = 2π E n+1 E n iω m E n E n 1 iω m β m n

Calculations in Matsubara space IMAGINARY-TIME GREEN S FUNCTION CUMULANT DECOMPOSITION DIAGRAMMATIC RULES AND EXAMPLES Translational invariance in time suggests Matsubara transform: C (0) 1 (ω m) = 1 [ ] (n + 1) n e βen, ω Z (0) m = 2π E n+1 E n iω m E n E n 1 iω m β m n In rule 3 integration over τ replaced by summation over ω m under consideration of frequency conservation on vertices: G (1) 1 (ω; i, j) = i j ω ω ω = Jδ d(i,j),1c (0) 1 (ω)2 G (2) 1 (ω; i, j) = i k j ω 1 ω 1 + ω ω ω ω ω i ω =J 2 (δ d(i,j),2 + 2δ d(i,j), 2 + 2Dδ i,j )C (0) 1 (ω)3 + J 2 2Dδ i,j 1 (ω 1)C (0) 2 (ω, ω 1 ω, ω 1 ) ω 1 C (0) k

Equal-time correlations TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Momentum space density: ˆn k = ˆψ (k) ˆψ(k) = w(k) 2 e ik(ri rj) â iâj, â iâj = lim G 1(τ, i 0, j) τ ր0 i,j }{{} S(k)

Equal-time correlations TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Momentum space density: ˆn k = ˆψ (k) ˆψ(k) = w(k) 2 e ik(ri rj) â iâj, â iâj = lim G 1(τ, i 0, j) τ ր0 i,j }{{} Quasi-momentum distribution: S(k) J(k) S(k) = K 0 + K 1 U + K J 2 (k) 2 U 2 +..., J(k) = 2J 3 cos(k l a) l=1

Equal-time correlations TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Momentum space density: ˆn k = ˆψ (k) ˆψ(k) = w(k) 2 e ik(ri rj) â iâj, â iâj = lim G 1(τ, i 0, j) τ ր0 i,j }{{} Quasi-momentum distribution: S(k) J(k) S(k) = K 0 + K 1 U + K J 2 (k) 2 U 2 +..., J(k) = 2J Lowest orders: G (0) 1 (0, i j, 0) = δ ij Z (0) G (1) 1 (0, i j, 0) =J2δ d(i,j),1 UZ (0)2 n ne βen n,k 3 cos(k l a) l=1 n(n + 1) (n k + 1)(k n + 1) e β(en+e k)

Time-of-flight pictures TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM first-order calculation (T = 0) second-order calculation (T = 0) experimental absorption pictures (a) V 0 = 8E R, (b) V 0 = 14E R, (c) V 0 = 18E R, and (d) V 0 = 30E R

Phase transition TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Phase transition requires diverging Green s function. Not possible in perturbation theory

Phase transition TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Phase transition requires diverging Green s function. Not possible in perturbation theory Solved by resummation: G 1 (ω; i, j) = ω i ω + i j ω ω ω + i k j ω ω ω ω + i k h j ω ω ω ω ω +...

Phase transition TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Phase transition requires diverging Green s function. Not possible in perturbation theory Solved by resummation: G 1 (ω; i, j) = ω i ω + i j ω ω ω Summed most easily in Fourier space: + i k j ω ω ω ω + i k h j ω ω ω ω ω +... G (1) 1 (ω,k) = C (0) 1 (ω) 1 J(k)C (0) 1 (ω), G (1) 1 (0,0) = C (0) 1 (0) 1 2DJC (0) 1 (0)

Phase transition TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Phase transition requires diverging Green s function. Not possible in perturbation theory Solved by resummation: G 1 (ω; i, j) = ω i ω + i j ω ω ω Summed most easily in Fourier space: + i k j ω ω ω ω + i k h j ω ω ω ω ω +... G (1) 1 (ω,k) = C (0) 1 (ω) 1 J(k)C (0) 1 (ω), G (1) 1 (0,0) = C (0) 1 (0) 1 2DJC (0) 1 (0) Neglected contributions like D k ω 1 ω 1 ω i ω vanish at least as 1/D for

Phase boundary TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Phase boundary given by: 2DJ c = ( n e βen n+1 n e βen E n+1 E n ) T 0 = n E n E n 1 1 n+1 E n+1 E n n E n E n 1

Phase boundary TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Phase boundary given by: 2DJ c = ( n e βen n+1 n e βen E n+1 E n ) T 0 = n E n E n 1 1 n+1 E n+1 E n Same result as obtained by mean-field theory (z = 2D): Jz U 0.2 0.175 0.15 0.125 superfluid k B T/U = 0 k B T/U = 0.02 k B T/U = 0.1 n E n E n 1 0.1 0.075 0.05 0.025 Mott insulator 1 2 3 4 µ U

Beyond mean field TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Replace by sum over all one-particle irreducable diagrams: ( = + + ) +...

Beyond mean field TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Replace by sum over all one-particle irreducable diagrams: ( = + + ) +... Full Green s function obtained by Dyson series: ( ) l+1 G 1 (ω,k) = J(k) l l=0

Beyond mean field TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Replace by sum over all one-particle irreducable diagrams: ( = + + ) +... Full Green s function obtained by Dyson series: ( ) l+1 G 1 (ω,k) = J(k) l Approximated by considering only the first two terms in l=0

Calculation of one-loop diagram TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM k ω 1 ω 1 ( 2Dδ i,j J 2 G (2B) 1 (ω) = ω i ω = 2Dδ i,j 1 Z (0)2 U 2 e β(en+e k) n,k { [ (k + 1)(n 1)n k 2 + 2(n 1) 2 µ 2 + 2k(2 2n µ) ] + β + 7 more terms { n,k C (0) 1 (ω) n,k (k n + 1) 2 (k 2n + µ)(1 n + µ) 2 } C (0) 1 (ω)3 [ ][ (n + 1)k n(k + 1) n + 1 + k n + 1 n k + 1 n µ iω [ ] (n + 1)k n(k + 1) + e β(en+e k) k n + 1 n k + 1 n n 1 µ iω }) ] e β(en+e k)

One-loop corrected phase boundary TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM 2nd order resummed Green s function: G (2) 1 (ω,k = 0) = C (0) 1 (ω) 1 J2DC (0) 1 (ω) + J2 2DG (2B) 1 (ω)/c (0) 1 (ω)

One-loop corrected phase boundary TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM 2nd order resummed Green s function: G (2) 1 (ω,k = 0) = C (0) 1 (ω) 1 J2DC (0) 1 (ω) + J2 2DG (2B) 1 (ω)/c (0) 1 (ω) Phase boundary { } J c = 1/ C (0) 1 (0)D 2DG (2B) 1 (0)/C (0) 1 (0) + D2 C (0)2(0) 1 In T =0 limit same result as E. Santos

TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Comparison with simulations for T = 0 J/U J/U 0.06 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 D = 3 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Capogrosso-Sansone et. al. PRB 75, 134302 (2007) n = 1. Black: First order (Mean field) Red: Second order µ/u 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 D = 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 µ/u Capogrosso-Sansone et. al. arxiv:0710.2703v3 (2007) 0.15 0.1 0.05 J/U D = 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Niyaz, et. al. PRB 44, 7143 (1991) µ/u

Finite-temperature phase diagram TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM J/U 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 µ/u J/U 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 µ/u D = 3. Black: 1st order. Red: 2nd Order. Left: T = 0.1 U. Right: T = 0.02 U Temperature effects small at tip of lobe Second-order correction largest at zero temperature

Real-time Green s function TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Dynamic properties determined by retarded Green s function in real-time: G 1 (t, j, t, j) = Θ(t t ) i {e [ ]} Z Tr βĥ â j,h (t), â j,h (t ) Can be obtained by analytic continuation of imaginary-time result. Easily done by replacing Zeroth order: G (0) 1 (ω; i, j) = δ i,j Z (0) n [ iω m ω + iη ] (n + 1) E n+1 E n ω iη n e βen E n E n 1 ω iη

Excitation spectrum TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Excitation spectrum given by poles of real-time Green s function

Excitation spectrum TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Excitation spectrum given by poles of real-time Green s function For T = 0: [ G (1) 1 (ω,k)] 1! = 0 = ω 1,2 = U 2 (2n 1) µ J(k) ± 1 2 U2 UJ(k)(4n + 2) + J(k) 2 Different signs correspond to particle and hole excitations

Excitation spectrum TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Excitation spectrum given by poles of real-time Green s function For T = 0: [ G (1) 1 (ω,k)] 1! = 0 = ω 1,2 = U 2 (2n 1) µ J(k) ± 1 2 U2 UJ(k)(4n + 2) + J(k) 2 Different signs correspond to particle and hole excitations Dispersion relation of pairs: ω ph (k) = ω 1 (k) ω 2 (k) = U 2 UJ(k)(4n + 2) + J(k) 2

Excitation spectrum TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM ω ph /U 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 E gap/u 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 n = 1, T = 0. Black: J = 0 Red: 2DJ = 0.13 U Blue: 2DJ = 2DJ c = 0.172 U k/a T/U 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 n = 1. Black: J = 0 Red: 2DJ = 0.13 U Blue: 2DJ = 0.17 U

Excitation spectrum TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM ω ph /U 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 E gap/u 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 n = 1, T = 0. Black: J = 0 Red: 2DJ = 0.13 U Blue: 2DJ = 2DJ c = 0.172 U k/a T/U 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 n = 1. Black: J = 0 Red: 2DJ = 0.13 U Blue: 2DJ = 0.17 U Gap vanishes when hopping reaches critical value. J c : Hopping at tip of lobe Gap experimentally measurable. Could serve as thermometer.

Summary TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Green s function contain necessary information about finite-temperature properties of Bose-Hubbard model Hopping expansion provides perturbative access to Green s function in Mott regime Time-of-flight pictures for deep lattices agree with experiment

Summary TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Green s function contain necessary information about finite-temperature properties of Bose-Hubbard model Hopping expansion provides perturbative access to Green s function in Mott regime Time-of-flight pictures for deep lattices agree with experiment Diagrammatic representation facilitates resummation One-loop corrected phase diagram in good agreement with Quantum Monte-Carlo data

Summary TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Green s function contain necessary information about finite-temperature properties of Bose-Hubbard model Hopping expansion provides perturbative access to Green s function in Mott regime Time-of-flight pictures for deep lattices agree with experiment Diagrammatic representation facilitates resummation One-loop corrected phase diagram in good agreement with Quantum Monte-Carlo data Excitation spectrum shows characteristic vanishing of gap at critical hopping

Outlook TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Transition between Mott insulator and normal gas

Outlook TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Transition between Mott insulator and normal gas Excitation spectrum in 2nd order Excitation spectrum as thermometer

Outlook TIME-OF-FLIGHT PHASE TRANSITION EXCITATION SPECTRUM Transition between Mott insulator and normal gas Excitation spectrum in 2nd order Excitation spectrum as thermometer Green s function within superfluid phase: near phase boundary with Landau expansion, far away with Bogoliubov theory