Forecast verification study for McMurdo and Palmer Stations: Preliminary Results

Similar documents
AMPS Update June 2016

Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station CLIMAT Message Project

The Antarctic-IDD. Matthew A. Lazzara

UNITED STATES ANTARCTIC PROGRAM

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008

The Future of the USAP Antarctic Internet Data Distribution System

Satellite-derived Wind, Cloud, and Surface Products at Direct Broadcast Sites in the Antarctic and Arctic

A Framework for Assessing Operational Model MJO Forecasts

Antarctic Automatic Weather Station Data for the calendar year 2000

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

AMPS Update June 2017

MODELING PRECIPITATION OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN IN ICELAND

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Jordan G. Powers Kevin W. Manning. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, USA

István Ihász, Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

Mio Matsueda (University of Oxford) Tetsuo Nakazawa (WMO)

Status Report from the Antarctic Meteorological Research Center

COSMIC GPS Radio Occultation and

The Relative Contributions of ECMWF Deterministic and Ensemble Forecasts in an Automated Consensus Forecasting System

Polar Weather Prediction

Adaptation for global application of calibration and downscaling methods of medium range ensemble weather forecasts

15 day VarEPS introduced at. 28 November 2006

Polar WRF. Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2013

Antarctic Automatic Weather Stations Abbreviated Field Report for

Experimental MOS Precipitation Type Guidance from the ECMWF Model

Application and verification of ECMWF products: 2010

Observations needed for verification of additional forecast products

EVALUATION OF ANTARCTIC MESOSCALE PREDICTION SYSTEM (AMPS) FORECASTS FOR DIFFERENT SYNOPTIC WEATHER PATTERNS

Jordan G. Powers Kevin W. Manning. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO

SuperPack North America

Forecast Models. General Meteorology Laboratory #11

On Improving the Output of. a Statistical Model

István Ihász, Máté Mile and Zoltán Üveges Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

Correcting Microwave Precipitation Retrievals for near- Surface Evaporation

Figure ES1 demonstrates that along the sledging

Module 11: Meteorology Topic 5 Content: Weather Maps Notes

CustomWeather Statistical Forecasting (MOS)

Optimal combination of NWP Model Forecasts for AutoWARN

The Impact of Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble Size on Probabilistic Forecasts of Precipitation by the ECMWF EPS

Verification of Continuous Forecasts

INDIAN OCEAN STATE February 14, 2018 MJO INDEX

AMPS Support for Antarctic Science and Logistics A Decennial Review

Ground-based GPS networks for remote sensing of the atmospheric water vapour content: a review

Verification of different wind gust parametrizations Overview of verification results at MeteoSwiss in the year 2012

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2018

General Meteorology Laboratory #11. Forecast Models

Akira Ito & Staffs of seasonal forecast sector

THE NEXT GENERATION POLAR CLIMATE AND WEATHER STATION

Implementation of global surface index at the Met Office. Submitted by Marion Mittermaier. Summary and purpose of document

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

Re-analysis activities at SMHI

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007

Improving Gap Flow Simulations Near Coastal Areas of Continental Portugal

Application and verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

INDIAN OCEAN STATE February 28, 2018 MJO INDEX

Badger Flood Situation Report. Robert Picco Amir Ali Khan Ken Rollings. Department of Environment Water Resources Management Division

Enhancing Weather Forecasts via Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture and NRT GVF

Impact of METOP ASCAT Ocean Surface Winds in the NCEP GDAS/GFS and NRL NAVDAS

Bias Correction of Satellite Data in GRAPES-VAR

Analysis of long-term temporal variations in atmospheric water vapor time series

Sky Cover: Shining Light on a Gloomy Problem

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION BY MEANS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO ESTABLISH EARLY WARNING SYSTEM

An Investigation of Reforecasting Applications for NGGPS Aviation Weather Prediction: An Initial Study of Ceiling and Visibility Prediction

Data impact studies in the global NWP model at Meteo-France

WEATHER SOURCES FSS WXBRIEF

Filippo MAIMONE Climate Department CNMCA (Operational Meteorological and Climate Center) Italian National Meteorological Service.

Counselor s Name: Counselor s Ph #: 1) Define meteorology. Explain how the weather affects farmers, sailors, aviators,

Put the Weather to Work for Your Company

Climate Regions. Combining Climate Graphs and Köppen s Classification

Application of Probability Density Function - Optimal Interpolation in Hourly Gauge-Satellite Merged Precipitation Analysis over China

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

YOPP archive: needs of the verification community

Climatography of the United States No

The National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Operational Snow Analysis

The Polar Wind Product Suite

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

4.5 Comparison of weather data from the Remote Automated Weather Station network and the North American Regional Reanalysis

Verification of wind forecasts of ramping events

The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting

Description of the case study

P3.1 Development of MOS Thunderstorm and Severe Thunderstorm Forecast Equations with Multiple Data Sources

Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Integrating Nowcastingwith crisis management and risk prevention in a transnational framework (INCA-CE)

Probabilistic Forecast Verification. Yuejian Zhu EMC/NCEP/NOAA

Assimilation of Satellite Infrared Brightness Temperatures and Doppler Radar Observations in a High-Resolution OSSE

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

COMPOSITE ANALYSIS OF EL NINO SOUTHERN OSCILLATION EVENTS ON ANTARCTICA

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Speedwell High Resolution WRF Forecasts. Application

Importance of Numerical Weather Prediction in Variable Renewable Energy Forecast

Towards a Definitive High- Resolution Climate Dataset for Ireland Promoting Climate Research in Ireland

ABSTRACT 3 RADIAL VELOCITY ASSIMILATION IN BJRUC 3.1 ASSIMILATION STRATEGY OF RADIAL

Observational Needs for Polar Atmospheric Science

1 Introduction. Station Type No. Synoptic/GTS 17 Principal 172 Ordinary 546 Precipitation

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

AN ENSEMBLE STRATEGY FOR ROAD WEATHER APPLICATIONS

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011

Peter P. Neilley. And. Kurt A. Hanson. Weather Services International, Inc. 400 Minuteman Road Andover, MA 01810

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Transcription:

Forecast verification study for McMurdo and Palmer Stations: Preliminary Results Jonas V. Asuma Antarctic Meteorological Research Center University of Wisconsin - Madison 3 rd Antarctic Meteorological Observation, Modeling, and Forecasting Workshop - Madison, WI June 11 th, 28

Motivation

Forecast Sources

McMurdo Forecast Sources Resident SPAWAR Forecasters Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System (AMPS) FORECA provides forecasts for MSN.com Finnish Company Largest in Nordic Countries Data source not listed The Weather Channel (weather.com( weather.com) US company Data source not listed Weather Underground (wunderground.com( wunderground.com) International forecasts NCEP AVN model run

Palmer Forecast Sources SPAWAR Forecasters in Charleston AMPS send out Town forecasts daily Qwikcast.com National Weather Service.5 GFS model for international forecasts METAR s from nearest location (Falkland Islands) Weather Underground International forecasts NCEP AVN model run

Palmer/McMurdo Town Forecast

Method

Method Compared High and Low Temperature forecasts versus the McMurdo/Palmer Station monthly climatologies Temperature Universally forecasted across sources Statistical analysis performed Computed the, Accumulated, Average, Root Mean-Squared (RMSE), Accumulated MSE, Maximum, and Correlation Coefficient Produced scatter plots to visualize error

Results

McMurdo High/Low Temperatures

McMurdo Station Forecasts: High Temperatures MCM High Temp 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4 Obs vs. MCM High Temp (C) -32-28 -24-2 -16-12 -8-4 4 Obs High Temp Obs vs. MSN High Temp (C) Correlation =.9122547 Correlation =.7462791 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4 MSN High Temp -32-28 -24-2 -16-12 -8-4 4 Obs High Temp Wx Channel High Temp 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4 Obs vs. WX Channel High Temp (C) -32-28 -24-2 -16-12 -8-4 4 Obs High Temp 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4 Obs vs. Wx Underground High Temp (C) Correlation =.363229 Correlation =.8527524 Wx Underground High Temp -32-28 -24-2 -16-12 -8-4 4 Obs High Temp

McMurdo Station Forecasts: High Temperatures (148 days) Forecast Source Acc. Average Max RMSE MCM 292 1.98 7.12 2.5º Corr. Coef..9122 Wx Und. 54 3.65 12.18 4.43º.8527 Wx 884 5.97 19.71 7.52º.363 Channel MSN Wx 1 6.76 18.97 8.19º.7462

McMurdo Station Forecasts: Low Temperatures Obs vs. MCM Low Temp (C) Obs vs. MSN Low Temp (C) MCM Low Temp 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4-45 -5-4 -35-3 -25-2 -15-1 -5 Obs Low Temp Correlation =.885111 Correlation =.7244981-5 MSN Low Temp -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4-45 -5-4 -35-3 -25-2 -15-1 -5 Obs Low Temp Wx Channel Low Temp Obs vs. Wx Channel Low Temp (C) 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4-45 -5-4 -35-3 -25-2 -15-1 -5 Obs Low Temp Obs vs. Wx Underground Low Temp (C) Correlation =.4851495 Correlation =.83495 Wx Underground Low Temp 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4-45 -5-4 -35-3 -25-2 -15-1 -5 Obs Low Temp

McMurdo Station Forecasts: Low Temperatures (164 days) Forecast Source Sum Average Max RMSE MCM 464 2.83 14.2 3.72º Corr. Coef..885 Wx Und. 55 3.8 11.29 3.81º.8341 MSN Wx 1121 6.84 18.61 8.2º.7244 Wx Channel 1268 7.74 26.84 9.47º.4851

Palmer High/Low Temperatures

Palmer Station Forecasts: High Temperatures PAL High Temp Qwikcast High Temp Obs vs. PAL High Temp (C) 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 -12-14 -16-18 -2-14. -12. -1. -8. -6. -4. -2.. 2. 4. 6. 8. Obs High Temp Obs vs. Qwikcast High Temp (C) Correlation =.714855 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 -12-14 -16-18 -2-14. -12. -1. -8. -6. -4. -2.. 2. 4. 6. 8. Obs High Temp Correlation =.86663 Wx Undergound High Temp Obs vs. Wx Underground High Temp (C) Correlation =.7248 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 -12-14 -16-18 -2-14. -12. -1. -8. -6. -4. -2.. 2. 4. 6. 8. Obs High Temp

Palmer Station Forecasts: High Temperatures (178 days) Forecast Source Sum Average Max RMSE PAL 315 1.77 7.2 2.36º Corr. Coef..867 Wx Und. 347 1.95 2.68 2.88º.724 Qwikcast 48 2.7 13.11 3.49º.7148

Palmer Station Forecasts: Low Temperatures PAL Low Temp 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 -12-14 -16-18 -2-22 Wx Underground Low Temp Obs vs. PAL Low Temp (C) -18. -16. -14. -12. -1. -8. -6. -4. -2.. 2. 4. 8 6 4-2 2-4 -6-1 -8-12 -14-16 -18-2 -22 Obs Low Temp Obs vs. Wx Underground Low Temp (C) -18. -16. -14. -12. -1. -8. -6. -4. -2.. 2. 4. Obs Low Temp Correlation =.762566 Correlation =.69919 Qwikcast Low Temp 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -1-8 -12-14 -16-18 -2-22 Obs vs. Qwikcast Low Temp (C) -18. -16. -14. -12. -1. -8. -6. -4. -2.. 2. 4. Obs Low Temp Correlation =.84359

Palmer Station Forecasts: Low Temperatures (187 days) Forecast Source Sum Average Max RMSE PAL 359 1.92 7.67 2.45º Corr. Coef..7626 Qwikcast 43 2.2 11. 2.77º.843 Wx Und. 394 2.11 2.57 3.11º.699

Conclusions/Future Work

Conclusions SPAWAR forecasters most accurate Accumulated, Average, and Mean Squared Despite forecast hiccups Average and Mean Squared most significant indications of accuracy Correlation Coefficient not the best indicator of forecast accuracy

Future Work Perform similar study but: Use longer dataset preferably an entire year Compare multiple parameters Wind direction/speed, precipitation, cloud cover Compare more forecast sources Other private forecast companies i.e. AccuWeather

Acknowledgements Matt Lazzara,, Linda Keller, AMRC, Chester Clogston,, Ken Edele,, Harry Stockman, and NSF