= ~ M3~ Figure 0.1: Sensor and sensorless modes

Similar documents
Integrator Windup

Quanser NI-ELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control. DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual

Acceleration and velocity are related and have a direct impact on the three basic parts of the CNC system.

Acceleration Feedback

Equal Pitch and Unequal Pitch:

Post-Test. For more information, please contact the MCU Training Team.

Mathematical Modeling and Dynamic Simulation of a Class of Drive Systems with Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors

Acknowledgements. Control System. Tracking. CS122A: Embedded System Design 4/24/2007. A Simple Introduction to Embedded Control Systems (PID Control)

Motors Automation Energy Transmission & Distribution Coatings. Servo Drive SCA06 V1.5X. Addendum to the Programming Manual SCA06 V1.

CiA Draft Standard Proposal CANopen. Application Profile for Lift Control Systems. Part 2: Virtual device definitions

FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS

Lab 3: Quanser Hardware and Proportional Control

B1-1. Closed-loop control. Chapter 1. Fundamentals of closed-loop control technology. Festo Didactic Process Control System

Application Note #3413

Stepping Motors. Chapter 11 L E L F L D

Chapter 7 Control. Part Classical Control. Mobile Robotics - Prof Alonzo Kelly, CMU RI

Lecture 6: Control Problems and Solutions. CS 344R: Robotics Benjamin Kuipers

Dynamics of Machines. Prof. Amitabha Ghosh. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module No.

SEMINAR ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, INFORMATICS, AND ITS EDUCATION

Current Reduction in Stepping Motor Applications using an Adaptive PI controller based on Linearized Dynamics

Sensorless Sliding Mode Control of Induction Motor Drives

Automatic Control Systems. -Lecture Note 15-

Digital Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors

Analysis, Design, Implementation of Sensorless V/f control in a Surface Mounted PMSM without damper winding

ECE 5670/6670 Lab 8. Torque Curves of Induction Motors. Objectives

Overview of motors and motion control

Mechatronics Engineering. Li Wen

Transient Stability Analysis with PowerWorld Simulator

Sensorless Five-Phase Induction Motor Drive with Inverter Output Filter and Fault Detection Possibility. Patryk D. Strankowski

RamchandraBhosale, Bindu R (Electrical Department, Fr.CRIT,Navi Mumbai,India)

EE 410/510: Electromechanical Systems Chapter 4

7. Transient stability

Lesson 17: Synchronous Machines

Spontaneous Speed Reversals in Stepper Motors

CHV Series Vector Control Inverter Options. Operating Instructions for Tension Control Card

Rotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02. Rotary Experiment #11: 1-DOF Torsion. 1-DOF Torsion Position Control using QuaRC. Student Manual

Automatic Control (TSRT15): Lecture 1

Sensorless Control for High-Speed BLDC Motors With Low Inductance and Nonideal Back EMF

TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON MOTOR PERFORMANCE

Electrical Drives I. Week 3: SPEED-TORQUE characteristics of Electric motors

L03: pn Junctions, Diodes

MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab. Chapter 5: Electromechanical Transducers

Sensorless DTC-SVM of Induction Motor by Applying Two Neural Controllers

AN EXPERIMENTAL WEB TENSION CONTROL SYSTEM: SYSTEM SET-UP

Control 2. Proportional and Integral control

Lecture 8: Sensorless Synchronous Motor Drives

Lecture 6: Time-Dependent Behaviour of Digital Circuits

AKD SYSTEM CONFIGURATION WITH KOLLMORGEN DDL LINEAR MOTORS By Kenny Hampton 1/12/2017 Rev. L

Control. CSC752: Autonomous Robotic Systems. Ubbo Visser. March 9, Department of Computer Science University of Miami

POWER SYSTEM STABILITY

Technical Guide for Servo Motor Selection

Robust Speed Controller Design for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives Based on Sliding Mode Control

Sensorless Torque and Speed Control of Traction Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor for Railway Applications based on Model Reference Adaptive System

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DIRECT TORQUE CONTROL OF 3-PHASE INDUCTION MOTOR

Dynamic Modeling of Surface Mounted Permanent Synchronous Motor for Servo motor application

System Modeling: Motor position, θ The physical parameters for the dc motor are:

MSBCCL Series Asynchronous Three-Phase Brake Motors With Squirrel Cage Rotor Direct Current Brake

II. Mathematical Modeling of

We provide two sections from the book (in preparation) Intelligent and Autonomous Road Vehicles, by Ozguner, Acarman and Redmill.

Encoders. Understanding. November design for industry: Help clean up the ocean. Horizon failure forensics

ISSN: (Online) Volume 2, Issue 2, February 2014 International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies

FRENIC-Ace (C2) (Supplement to RS-485 User's Manual)

Modelling of Closed Loop Speed Control for Pmsm Drive

Sensorless Speed Control for PMSM Based On the DTC Method with Adaptive System R. Balachandar 1, S. Vinoth kumar 2, C. Vignesh 3

ECE 5670/ Lab 3. PID Control of a Brush DC Motor. Objectives

Research on the winding control system in winding vacuum coater

AC Induction Motor Stator Resistance Estimation Algorithm

(Refer Slide Time: 1:42)

MODELING AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONTROL OF ELECTRIC MACHINES

MODIFIED SCHEME OF PREDICTIVE TORQUE CONTROL FOR THREE-PHASE FOUR-SWITCH INVERTER-FED MOTOR DRIVE WITH ADAPTIVE DC-LINK VOLTAGE IMBALANCE SUPPRESSION

Plasma Physics Prof. V. K. Tripathi Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Accurate Joule Loss Estimation for Rotating Machines: An Engineering Approach

Survey of Methods of Combining Velocity Profiles with Position control

Laboratory Exercise 1 DC servo

A New Novel of transverse differential protection Scheme

APPENDIX. SELECTING THE SureServo SERVO SYSTEM. In This Appendix... Selecting the SureServo Servo System...B 2. Leadscrew - Example Calculations...

A New Model Reference Adaptive Formulation to Estimate Stator Resistance in Field Oriented Induction Motor Drive

Speed Sensor less Control and Estimation Based on Mars for Pmsm under Sudden Load Change

A High Performance DTC Strategy for Torque Ripple Minimization Using duty ratio control for SRM Drive

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BSC (HONS) MECHATRONICS TOP-UP SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED MECHATRONIC SYSTEMS

Double Pendulum Power Method for Extracting Power from a Mechanical Oscillator -

Multi Rotor Scalability

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development SIMULATION OF FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR

DEVELOPMENT OF DIRECT TORQUE CONTROL MODELWITH USING SVI FOR THREE PHASE INDUCTION MOTOR

By: B. Fahimi. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla Tel: (573) Fax: (573) EML:

Wheel and Axle. Author: Joseph Harrison. Research Ans Aerospace Engineering 1 Expert, Monash University

Fig Use Fig. 3.1 to state the physical properties of this metal. In your answer, you should use appropriate technical terms, spelled correctly.

Speed Control of Torsional Drive Systems with Backlash

Rotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02. Rotary Experiment #01: Modeling. SRV02 Modeling using QuaRC. Student Manual

SRV02-Series Rotary Experiment # 1. Position Control. Student Handout

Modeling of Direct Torque Control (DTC) of BLDC Motor Drive

Input-Output Linearization of an Induction Motor Using MRAS Observer

Game Physics. Game and Media Technology Master Program - Utrecht University. Dr. Nicolas Pronost

MCE493/593 and EEC492/592 Prosthesis Design and Control

Simulating a Power System

Keywords: Electric Machines, Rotating Machinery, Stator faults, Fault tolerant control, Field Weakening, Anisotropy, Dual rotor, 3D modeling

2016 Kappa Electronics Motor Control Training Series 2016 Kappa Electronics LLC. -V th. Dave Wilson Co-Owner Kappa Electronics.

Parameter Prediction and Modelling Methods for Traction Motor of Hybrid Electric Vehicle

Master thesis Model-based-design to develop sensorless fan

Chapter 9: Transient Stability

Transcription:

0.1. Application Note - Sensorless Title Sensorless Velocity Control for PMSM Number Device S300/S700 Author Juan C. Ramirez Martinez Module Date Firmware 5.55 Page 14 Function Sensorless 0.1 Application Note - Sensorless This application note describes the feature Sensorless for PMSM in a Servostar S300/S700. Contents: Introduction Tuning stepper and sensorless feature Summary of parameters Results when sensorless is working Help when sensorless is not working 0.1.1 Introduction Sensorless is a method that allows the operation of electrical machines without needing a feedback sensor (See Fig. 0.1). To close the loop, the feedback signal is estimated. Such estimation depends of which kind of sensorless is being applied. In our case, sensorless is based on a reduced machine model. In a few words, when the orientation is not correct (false angle) a Back-EMF (Electromagnetic force) is present at d-axis. Based on that principle, position will be estimated and used as control variable. As soon as sensorless detects that BEMF in D is close to zero, then the position will be considered as correct. When a disturbance appears, a BEMF will appear again in d-axis and sensorless will try to reduce this BEMF controlling the position as mentioned. u* e j PWM = ~ u* e j^ PWM = ~ ^ u PMSM Model i M3~ M3~ Position / Velocity loops (a) Typical feedback solution with sensor Velocity loop (b) Sensorless Figure 0.1: Sensor and sensorless modes Most of the S700 Servo-drive applications are considered to be of high-performance and such high-dynamic can be just reached using a sensor. On the other side, sensorless-dynamic is considerably slower than sensor-dynamic. Therefore: Sensorless-mode is not a substitute or replacement for sensor-mode and actually it should only be considered as an option Eliminating a sensor and using sensorless is not a way to reduce costs Sensorless should be used in applications of limited dynamic and when the use of sensor is complicated A sensorless axis performs best if it runs close to nominal speed. The machine in sensorless mode should be chosen that the velocity range of the application is higher than 50% of the nominal speed of the machine Sensorless should not be applied for positioning applications 1

Juan C. Ramirez 0.1.2 Tuning stepper and sensorless feature In the following steps, a general protocol to tune sensorless is described. 1. In DriveGUI-Feedback window select Feedback Type = 10 Sensorless and ensure that SLMODE is set to 1. If not, do it manually, typing SLMODE = 1 in terminal page 2. Because sensorless-mode is not as dynamic as sensor-mode, the slopes for SLACCMAX, ACC and DEC should be slow. At the beginning, try at most SLACCMAX = ACC = DEC = 600rad/s 2. If this value shows troubles at transition point, make the slopes slower, specially the value for SLACCMAX 3. At this point, parameters for current controller (MLGQ & KTN) and for velocity controller (GV & GVTN) are already set, maybe according to the Motor-Name or set by the user. Most of the parameters have not big influence in sensorless performance, but GV and specially GVTN. As mentioned, sensorless-mode is not as dynamic as sensor-mode. For that reason, the proportional part of the velocity controller (GV) should be small and integral part (GVTN) should be slow. For GVTN, values under 30ms will crash the sensorless completely. A value around 100ms is expected to show good performance 4. As a matter of principle back-emf, sensorless mode cannot work at zero or very low speeds. Therefore at zero and low speeds, a feed-forward stepper-mode is used. The user should set two parameters to decide a threshold velocity (SLJSWITCH) and a transition time (SLTSWITCH) between stepper and sensorless modes. For SLJSWITCH a value of 10% nominal speed or higher is mandatory. SLTSWITCH defines a time in which the motor remains at speed SLJSWITCH to let the observer integrators settle (grey line in Fig. 0.2). SLTSWITCH can often be set to zero so that the transition will be done instantaneously (black line in Fig. 0.2). SLTSWITCH can be used only in the acceleration slope, while SLJSWITCH is present in acceleration and deceleration slope as well Velocity SLJSWITCH 0 Sensorless Mode ACC/DEC Stepper Mode SLACCMAX Time SLTSWITCH Figure 0.2: Transition between stepper and sensorless mode 5. In stepper-mode a current defined by id = MIMR is injected in the machine windings. Being MIMR the unique manipulated variable here, a value for MIMR = 30% MICONT is advisable. However, if this current is not high enough to generate the required torque and make the motor rotate in stepper-mode, then this value should be increased. 6. Mostly, sensorless-mode depends of three parameters: SLIDK01, SLIQK& SLIQK1. The range of values SLIDK01 goes from 0 up to 1. Be aware that values close to 1 would generate faults (over speed, commutation error, etc.). While SLIDK01 = 0 does the motor just working on stepper mode until velocity limit SLJSWITCH (See Fig. 0.3). For some applications, it is sufficient to run the drive only in stepper mode. This is one possibility, just set SLJSWITCH=VLIM. But be aware, stepper mode is not a close-loop control. For the beginning set SLIQK & SLIQK1 to zero and start tuning SLIDK01. Set a value of SLIDK01 = 0.1 and if the motor does not move or stop after some seconds (similar to Fig. 0.17) then increase SLIDK01. For SLIDK01 a value between 0.1 and 0.3 is expected to develop a good performance 7. After SLIDK01 is already done, SLIQK and SLIQK1 should be set according to the following values that were obtained from experimental results. SLIQK1 = 1 and SLIQK should be select according to the model of S700 and Table 0.1 8. Other parameter that should be also fixed for sensorless is the band-width for the observer (MRESBW). A value of 50Hz or lesser (at least 30Hz) is recommended 2

0.1. Application Note - Sensorless S300 /S700 Model SLIQK factor 701 1 706 4 712 8 724 10 748 20 772 30 Table 0.1: Values for SLIQK Figure 0.3: Velocity response when SLJSWITCH = 500rpm, SLIDK01 = 0 and J = 1000rpm 0.1.3 Summary of parameters A summary of all parameters that should be taken in account for sensorless is shown in Table 0.2. Here an example set for a S712 and a motor 6SM37L4000. The recommended values are also shown. 3

Juan C. Ramirez Parameter Set value Units Recommended value SLMODE 1 1 SLIDK01 0.23 0.1<SLIDK01<0.3 SLIQK 8 See Table 0.1 SLIQK1 1 1 SLTSWITCH 0 ms SLJSWITCH 200 rpm 10 % of MSPEED SLTEMPM 0 0 SLACCMAX 418 rad/s 2 at most 600 ACC 418 rad/s 2 at most 600 DEC 418 rad/s 2 at most 600 MRESBW 50 Hz at most 50 MIMR 0.9 A 30 % of MICONT MVR 0 rpm 0 VLIM 4000 rpm GV 0.053 A s/rad GVTN 100 ms 100 MLGQ 90 V/A KTN 0.725 ms Table 0.2: Main parameters that affect sensorless performance 0.1.4 Results when sensorless is working The following results are the conclusion of several tests. A summary of the results with a S712 using a 6SM37L4000 as motor and a 6SM37S6000 (KT = 0.5Nm/A) as load machine will be presented here: No load and a velocity reference of 3000rpm Figure 0.4: Velocity response 4

0.1. Application Note - Sensorless Figure 0.5: Estimated position DELTASL Figure 0.6: Transition point at approximately 0.4s (J = 3000rpm) Most of the sensorless difficulties are present at transition point. Taking a look carefully at Figs.?? and 0.6 can help you to identify where difficulties come from. 5

Juan C. Ramirez No load and change in velocity reference from 3000rpm to 3600rpm Figure 0.7: Velocity response With load. The load machine is set to OPMODE = 2 and a load torque of T = 0.1Nm is applied at the beginning Figure 0.8: Velocity response 6

0.1. Application Note - Sensorless With load T = 0.1Nm applied when the motor is already rotating Figure 0.9: Velocity response With a load torque profile of T = 0.1 Nm and t = 1500s, applied at the beginning Figure 0.10: Velocity response 7

Juan C. Ramirez Here with the most complex cases, which means: Slow velocity. 12.5% of the nominal speed = 500rpm Maximal load torque from the machine T = 0.5Nm (see Fig. 0.11) And fast transition of the load, in this case 750ms (see Fig. 0.12) Warning: A velocity command of 12.5% of the nominal speed is really too slow for reliable continuous sensorless operation. It is used here only for demonstration at the lowest limit. Naturally the response from Fig. 0.11 is not as good as the response using sensor. Here some conclusions: Sensorless is able to keep operating the machine, even when the velocity reference is only 12.5% of the nominal speed. But this is only an example of the lowest limit and should not be used as reference for real operation Besides, the velocity in Fig. 0.11 cannot be considered as controlled The load is changing quickly, but it is not reason to lose the position for the field oriented control Also, as mentioned before, this is an example and should not be considered for real operation. Figure 0.11: Sensorless response with a profile load torque and 12.5% nominal speed 8

0.1. Application Note - Sensorless Figure 0.12: Profile of load torque 0.1.5 Help when sensorless is not working In the following section, several problematic cases will be shown and possible solutions as well. GVTN is too small Using the parameters of Table 0.2, but GVTN = 6ms. Setting a velocity reference of 3000 rpm. Fig. 0.13 shows a plot of velocity response. SLJSWITCH = 200 is the transition point, where the position is lost. Here a lot of possible combinations for SLIDK01 & SLIQK and different values for SLJSWITCH were tested without positive results. The unique solution is a bigger value of GVTN. 9

Juan C. Ramirez Figure 0.13: Velocity and curent responses with GVTN = 6ms Figure 0.14: Sensorless variables with GVTN = 6ms GVTN is on the limits Using the parameters of Table 0.2, but GVTN = 31.5ms. Setting a velocity reference of 3000 rpm 10

0.1. Application Note - Sensorless Figure 0.15: Velocity and current responses with GVTN = 31.5ms Figure 0.16: Velocity response with GVTN = 31.5ms There is a range of values for GVTN that is on the limits between functional and nonfunctional. In such cases (see Figs. 0.15-0.16), the position and velocity will be correctly calculated for some instants and then sensorless get into an oscillation zone and the motor will start to vibrate and eventually lose orientation completely. As mentioned GVTN can be set to 100ms and then start decreasing this value until an acceptable performance is found. 11

Juan C. Ramirez SLIDK01 smaller than 0.2 Using the parameters of Table 0.2, but SLIDK01 = 0.06 and setting a velocity reference of 3000 rpm. Figure 0.17: Velocity response and current responses with GVTN = 0.06ms Figure 0.18: Velocity response with GVTN = 0.06ms Figs. 0.17-0.18 show a similar performance as Figs. 0.15-0.16. Also here, the estimated actual velocity is correctly estimated, but the control gets into an oscillation zone and the motor vibrates. Differently to Figs. 0.17-0.18 is that 12

0.1. Application Note - Sensorless here, in most of the cases, after some second the motor will remain still because the current is zero. This means the orientation has been lost. SLIDK01 bigger than 0.3 Using the parameters of Table 0.2, but SLIDK01 = 0.4. Setting a velocity reference of 3000 rpm. As seen in Figs. 0.19-0.20, the motor remains still. At the transition point DELTAERR is composed 98% by ISLD and only 2% by ISLQ. Therefore, a relative correct value for SLIDK01 is mandatory. In this case, reducing to SLIDK01 solve the problem. As seen in Figs. 0.13-0.20, a wrong value for GVTN or SLIDK01 show similar troubles. A recommendation is to set firstly GVTN = 100 ms and the set a reliable value for SLIDK01. After that, you can start reducing the value for GVTN. 13

Juan C. Ramirez Figure 0.19: Velocity response Figure 0.20: Velocity response 14