Kentucky Seismic and Strong Motion Network - Including the Central United States Seismic Observatory (CUSSO)

Similar documents
Seismic Velocity Measurements at Expanded Seismic Network Sites


Seismic Recording Station AZ_PFO Summary Report

Seismic Recording Station TA_109C Summary Report

The San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth: Recent Site Characterization Studies and the 2.2-Km-Deep Pilot Hole

AN EVALUATION OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND-MOTION SITE EFFECTS AT TWO SITES UNDERLAIN BY DEEP SOILS IN WESTERN KENTUCKY

Originally published as:

ESTIMATION FOR S-WAVE VELOCITY PROFILE USING RAYLEIGH WAVE INDUCED BY THE STANDARD PENETRATION TEST

Earthquakes, Tsunamis and Nuclear Explosions: Open Data Exchange for Research and Monitoring in Seismology

GROUND MOTION CHARACTERISTIC IN THE KAOHSIUNG & PINGTUNG AREA, TAIWAN

DEVELOPMENT OF EMPIRICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY AND STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE IN SOILS OF CHENNAI CITY

The quarter-wavelength average velocity: a review of some past and recent application developments

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

the IRIS Consortium Collaborative, Multi-user Facilities for Research and Education Briefing NSF Business Systems Review September 9, 2008

Seismicity in Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Seismic Network (PASEIS)

Research infrastructures in FP7: Seismology and Geophysics

Analysis Of Earthquake Records of Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response System Stations Related to the Determination of Site Fundamental Frequency

Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Field Further Studies Jan Dirk Jansen TU Delft

3D VISCO-ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN THE BORREGO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

INVESTIGATION OF SITE RESPONSE IN KATHMANDU VALLEY USING AFTERSHOCK DATA OF THE 2015 GORKHA EARTHQUAKE, NEPAL

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE FOR SITE- SPECIFIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS USED IN US BUILDING CODES

P Wave Reflection and Refraction and SH Wave Refraction Data Processing in the Mooring, TN Area

Haiti: Earthquake on January 12, 2010

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

The UK GeoEnergy Test Bed Ceri J Vincent British Geological Survey

Seismic tests at Southern Ute Nation coal fire site

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

THE NEW DIGITAL SEISMIC NETWORK IN GHANA THE WAYFORWARD AND THE CHALLENGES

Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in or Near Ignace

ACCOUNTING FOR SITE EFFECTS IN PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS: OVERVIEW OF THE SCEC PHASE III REPORT

Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station

[S06 ] Shear Wave Resonances in Sediments on the Deep Sea Floor

NESEC NEWS. Published by the Northeast States Emergency Consortium. Wakefield, Massachusetts

By D.H. Lang 1 and J. Schwarz 1. This paper is an extract from

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Shear Velocity in Urban Basins

Comparison of CPT Based Liquefaction Potential and Shear Wave Velocity Maps by Using 3-Dimensional GIS

Ground-Water Exploration in the Worthington Area of Nobles County: Summary of Seismic Data and Recent Test Drilling Results

3D Elevation Program, Lidar in Missouri. West Central Regional Advanced LiDAR Workshop Ray Fox

Unique Site Conditions and Response Analysis Challenges in the Central and Eastern U.S.

Real time Monitoring System for Earthquakes and Tsunamis (DONET)

Ship heave effects while drilling: observations from Legs 185 & 188

Geological Mapping using Geophysics

On May 4, 2001, central Arkansas experienced an M=4.4 earthquake followed by a

Advantages of Regional and Global Data Exchange. Gavin Hayes U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center

Geophysical Site Investigation (Seismic methods) Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Initial Borehole Drilling in the Hornepayne and Manitouwadge Area

Harvey Thorleifson, Director, Minnesota Geological Survey. Status of geological mapping needed for groundwater protection in Minnesota

Seismic Observation and Seismicity of Uganda

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

SEISMIC CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARCTIC

IGUT Seismic Network. Institute of Geophysics University of Tehran (IGUT) Mehdi Rezapour

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF FROZEN ROCK ON EXPLOSIVE COUPLING

Final Technical Report COLLECTION, COMPILATION AND ANALYSIS OF GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL DATA FOR MAP PRODUCTION

Synthetic Near-Field Rock Motions in the New Madrid Seismic Zone

Verification of Predictions of Magnitude of Completeness Using an Earthquake Catalog

158 Reducing Earthquake Losses

Alaska Earthquake Center. By Natalia A. Ruppert Seismic Network Manager

Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in Central Huron,

Geotechnical Site Classification and Croatian National Annex for EC 8

STRONG-MOTION SEISMOGRAPH NETWORK OPERATED BY NIED: K-NET AND KiK-net

APPENDIX J. Dynamic Response Analysis

CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY

Overview. Tools of the Trade. USGS Decision-Making Tools for Pre-Earthquake Mitigation and Post-Earthquake Response

General Geologic Setting and Seismicity of the FHWA Project Site in the New Madrid Seismic Zone

Finding out what earthquakes have happened recently Subscribe to an alert system

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk

2.3 Notes: Earthquake Damage Can Be Reduced

Borehole Array observation system operated by Tono Research Institute of Earthquake Science and Some Interesting Result

Report on the evaluation of geophysical data and seismic site effects in the Maltese archipelago in relation to the calculation of seismic risk

A METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED LANDSLIDE RISK. Agency for the Environmental Protection, ITALY (

New Madrid and Central U.S. Region Earthquake Hazard

Metallic Mineral Exploration in Minnesota: Typical Exploration Activities. Division of Lands and Minerals Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, , JAPAN

Seismic Velocity Database for the New Madrid Seismic Zone and Its Vicinity. Qian Li Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky

BAD VIBRATIONS (Earthquakes/Tsunamis)

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND HAZARDS MITIGATION: THE CENTRAL UNITED STATES AND NORTHWESTERN CHINA

REAL-TIME ASSESSMENT OF EARTHQUAKE DISASTER IN YOKOHAMA BASED ON DENSE STRONG-MOTION NETWORK

A THEORETICAL MODEL FOR SITE COEFFICIENTS IN BUILDING CODE PROVISIONS

Arthur Frankel, William Stephenson, David Carver, Jack Odum, Robert Williams, and Susan Rhea U.S. Geological Survey

Lima Project: Seismic Refraction and Resistivity Survey. Alten du Plessis Global Geophysical

Geology 229 Engineering Geology Lecture 27. Earthquake Engineering (Reference West, Ch. 18)

7.1 FIJI 1, :57:22 UTC

GEOMATICS AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT: Early Impact assessment in Haiti

Results of the Lacq pilot s monitoring Focus on microseismicity. Joëlle HY-BILLIOT 10 may - Venice

Agency Vision and Decision- Maker Needs: A USGS Perspective

High Resolution Seismic for Minerals

Integration of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis with Nonlinear Site Effects and Application to the Mississippi Embayment

SONGS Seismic Research Projects

Estimating energy balance for hydraulic fracture stimulations: Lessons Learned from Basel

Absolute strain determination from a calibrated seismic field experiment

Author: Seth Stein, William Deering Professor of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University. Background for Calais & Stein paper

A STUDY ON THE BLASTING VIBRATION CONTROL OF CREEP MASS HIGH SLOPE

Global Instrumental Seismicity Catalogue

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

TexNet and CISR Integrated Seismicity Monitoring and Research in Texas

Tsunami Response and the Enhance PTWC Alerts

I. Locations of Earthquakes. Announcements. Earthquakes Ch. 5. video Northridge, California earthquake, lecture on Chapter 5 Earthquakes!

Transcription:

Kentucky Seismic and Strong Motion Network - Including the Central United States Seismic Observatory (CUSSO) Jonathan McIntyre Kentucky Geological Survey University of Kentucky Zhenming Wang Kentucky Geological Survey University of Kentucky Edward W. Woolery Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Kentucky 2007 KRCEE-PGDP Technical Symposium 30 October 2007

26 monitoring stations 19 short-period seismometers 12 strong-motion accelerometers 2 vertical arrays (3 other boreholes w/o instruments) CUSSO (595-m borehole awaiting instrumentation)

KSSMN capable of monitoring any earthquake with a magnitude 2.0 or larger within Kentucky. Significant blasts, mine collapses, and explosions are also monitored and catalogued. Data from 12 seismic stations are continuously recorded as part of the near real-time monitoring system. System triggers to record events of note to be reviewed (noise, mine blasts, earthquakes). Real-time network utilizes the Kentucky Early Warning System (KEWS) for data transmission. Data from remaining stations are downloaded via modem (weekly) or are downloaded manually (quarterly). Recorded 30+ earthquakes since January 1, 2006. Magnitudes ranged from 1.5 to 3.4. Instruments available to rapidly begin aftershock studies for large events. Communicate with CERI if discrepancies occur from what is recorded by KSSMN and what is reported by CERI.

Website Near real-time viewing of digital webicorders for 12 stations. Refreshes every 3 minutes. Images are archived.

Recordings from the Kentucky Seismic and Strong Motion Network for the January 2, 2006 Illinois earthquake (magnitude 3.6) # 01/02/2006 earthquake (3.6) ÊÚ &V &V # # # &V # # # Magnitude 3.6 - Illinois January 2, 2006 21:48:57 UTC

Mine blast ROKY BHKY October 17 th, 2007 10:06:40 UTC

Temporary Seismic Network (PGDP area) 7 seismometers near PGDP, Wickliffe, Arlington, La Center, Lovelaceville, Ballard WMA, and Bardwell. Manually downloaded every 2-3 months and archived. Data compared to CERI and NEIC reported information.

8.9 3.6 18.7-89.000 36.920 12:21:42 06/20/05 Unprocessed 2.9 16.0-89.010 36.910 23:47:43 01/31/07 8.7 2.7 9.8-88.990 36.930 2:00:32 06/20/05 9.8 2.4 27.2-88.960 37.110 6:49:49 02/12/04 2.0 3.1 1.9-88.680 37.100 2:26:58 08/26/03 1.5 4 2.6-88.980 36.870 12:29:34 06/06/03 Depth (UK) Magnitude Depth (km) Long. Lat. Time (UTC) Date

Strong-motion Network Nine active stations. Two vertical arrays (VSAS, VSAP). Data recorded and stored locally temporarily. Events are recorded based on ground-motion thresholds specific to each site. Stored events are reviewed weekly via dial-up connection. Noise events are deleted. Seismic events are downloaded and archived. Usually average +/- 500-600 event triggers/week. Boreholes available to expand vertical array network.

Central US Seismic Observatory Phase 1 complete: (CUSSO) Project Drilled, logged, and cased a 595 m hole near the central segment of the NMSZ A cooperative effort between federal agencies and various elements at the University of Kentucky: the United States Department of Energy the U.S. Geological Survey the Kentucky Geological Survey the Kentucky Research Consortium for Energy and Environment the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences

Location Site Location (modified from USGS)

Borehole Specifics Mud-rotary operation 585 m (1,920 ) soil/sediment 9.5 m (30 ) into rock 4 steel casing (0 1,930 ) 4 stainless steel (1,930 1,950 )

Logging *log courtesy Drew Andrews and Steve Martin (KGS)

Site Amplification 1 st stiff layer, 260 m Existing vertical array @ CUSSO site

Instrumentation Plan Free-field FBA-23 Existing FBA-23DH @ 30 m Existing FBA-23DH @ 260 m Section View Proposed FBA-23DH @ 593 m

Immediate Tasks Instrumentation acquisition Perform refraction and reflection seismic imaging to obtain a comprehensive understanding of subsurface structural and stratigraphic geologic features in three dimensions in order to provide information regarding vertical and lateral variations in geometry and G max at the site. Measure deep borehole ground motion while shaking at the ground surface to obtain synthetic site response data.

Phase II: Instrumentation of the Deep Borehole Phase I of the Central United States Seismic Observatory (CUSSO) is completed Phase II will consist of installing and operating a three-dimensional array of borehole and surface accelerometers at the site A proposal has been submitted to NEHRP for funding of a workshop to be hosted at the University of Kentucky. The focus of the workshop will be to determine how to best instrument the observatory to compliment/enhance the existing instrumentation on site Phase II will begin upon completion of this workshop and after acquiring necessary funds to purchase the instrumentation

Project Significance Five significant technical contributions to earthquake engineering are ultimately expected from the final 3-D seismic observatory (CUSSO) in the New Madrid Seismic Zone: 1. Evaluation of the effect of deep soil conditions on earthquake ground motions. 2. Characterization of the dynamic soil properties of sediments in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. 3. Evaluation of current analytical models for deep soil sites. Several analytical models are currently being used to predict the seismic response of deep soil sites; however, these analytical procedures have not been validated for sites deeper than 100 m (i.e.,design engineers cannot be confident in their predictions). 4. Evaluation the recommended provisions of NEHRP, as they pertain to the New Madrid Seismic Zone. 5. Study of lateral propagation effects and spatial variation in ground motions. In addition to the scientific and engineering significance, the ability to reduce the large uncertainty in the existing seismic hazard definitions for western Kentucky will have positive societal impacts, particularly in the area of economic development.

Acknowledgements The Department of Energy The United States Geological Survey The Kentucky Research Consortium for Energy and Environment Mr. Austin Voorhees for providing the land for CUSSO Special acknowledgement: Dr. Ron Street. Who originally proposed the project in the early 1990 s during his tenure as Professor at the University of Kentucky Department of Geological Sciences