Determination of Marine Gravity Anomalies in the Truong Sa Archipelago s Sea Territory Using Satellite Altimeter Data

Similar documents
A global high resolution mean sea surface from multi mission satellite altimetry

High resolution geoid from altimetry & bathymetry: requirements for a future mission

RECENT DYNAMIC OCEAN TOPOGRAPHY MODELS AND THEIR COMPARISON

Comparison between EGM96 and FCUL96B tailored geopotential model for the north-east Atlantic

ON THE ACCURACY OF CURRENT MEAN SEA SURFACE MODELS FOR THE USE WITH GOCE DATA

The KMS04 Multi-Mission Mean Sea Surface.

Cryosat-2 SAR altimetry processing and use in the Arctic Ocean. Ole Andersen, M. Jain & Lars Stenseng

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

Hsinchu 300, Taiwan, R.O.C. Published online: 04 Mar 2011.

Journal of Applied Geophysics

The CNES CLS 2015 Global Mean Sea surface

TECH NOTE. New Mean Sea Surface for the CryoSat-2 L2 SAR Chain. Andy Ridout, CPOM, University College London

Geoid and MDT of the Arctic Ocean

Gravity Anomaly and Satellite Altimetry in the China Seas: Applications to Geodynamics

Arctic Ocean Mean Sea Surface, Geoid and Gravity from Surface Data, Icesat and GRACE a reference for Cryosat sea-ice mapping

A Factor of 2-4 Improvement in Marine Gravity and Predicted Bathymetry from CryoSat, Jason-1, and Envisat Radar Altimetry: Arctic and Coastal Regions

Globally covering a-priori regional gravity covariance models

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Towards a New Geoid Model of Tanzania Using Precise Gravity Data. 1. Introduction. Selassie David Mayunga

1 The satellite altimeter measurement

The GOCE User Toolbox

PGM2016: A new geoid model for the. Philippines

Near Real-Time Alongtrack Altimeter Sea Level Anomalies: Options. Corinne James and Ted Strub Oregon State University. Motivation

Final VRF grids Date: Aug 25, 2011 Author: R. Forsberg, G. Strykowski, O. Andersen

Curriculum Vitae. Haiying WANG

Global marine gravity field from the ERS-1 and Geosat geodetic mission altimetry

(1) , 6WHYH.HQ\RQ (2) *HRG\QDPLFV 'HSW 1DWLRQDO 6XUYH\ DQG &DGDVWUH 5HQWHPHVWHUYHM '. &RSHQKDJHQ 19 'HQPDUN UI#NPV GN

Gravimetry data validation in Algeria

TIDE GAUGE AND SATELLITE ALTIMETRY INTEGRATION FOR STORM SURGE PREDICTION

Earth-Oriented Space Research at TU-Delft

CEOS and Climate monitoring

More than 60% of the Earth s land and shallow

GOCE DATA PRODUCT VERIFICATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

Detailed Geoid Model for Africa Final Report

Assimilation of satellite altimetry referenced to the new GRACE geoid estimate

SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND GO-CONG MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE MODELING BY TELEMAC MODEL SUITE

Height systems. Rudi Gens Alaska Satellite Facility

Product Validation Report Polar Ocean

STUDY OF SATELLITE GRAVITY OVER THE SUMATRAN EARTHQUAKE REGION

Project GlobWave. User Meeting 5 th -6 th October, Geoff Busswell, GlobWave Project Manager

Precise Hong Kong Geoid HKGEOID-2000

Current state of art of satellite altimetry

sensors ISSN by MDPI

P. Cipollini, H. Snaith - A short course on Altimetry. Altimetry 2 - Data processing (from satellite height to sea surface height)

SSH retrieval in the ice covered Arctic Ocean: from waveform classification to regional sea level maps

Geophysical Correction Application in Level 2 CryoSat Data Products

Status of the European Gravimetric Quasigeoid

Stacked Global Satellite Gravity Proles. Mara M. Yale. Institution of Oceanography, David T. Sandwell. (Submitted to Geophysics: May 6, 1998) ABSTRACT

Wavelet Modeling of the Gravity Field over Japan

Dependences in the pillar Earth s gravity field of

The GOCE Geoid in Support to Sea Level Analysis

The first high-precision gravimetric geoid of Hungary: HGG2013

GEOid and Sea level Of the North Atlantic Region GEOSONAR. Final report

GLOBAL WAVEFORM SHAPE ANALYSIS FOR THE DETECTION AND MONITORING OF EPHEMERAL SURFACE WATER

A Factor of 2-4 Improvement in Marine Gravity and Predicted Bathymetry from CryoSat, Jason-1, and Envisat Radar Altimetry: Arctic and Coastal Regions

Height systems. Rüdiger Gens

Active microwave systems (2) Satellite Altimetry * the movie * applications

A Mission to Planet Mars Gravity Field Determination

GEOID UNDULATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GEOPOTENTIAL. RICHARD H. RAPP and YAN MING WANG

Latest Geoid Determinations for the Republic of Croatia

DERIVATION OF SEA LEVEL ANOMALY USING SATELLITE ALTIMETER. Ami Hassan Md Din, Kamaludin Mohd Omar

REFINED GEOID MODEL FOR THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

Comparison of Sea Surface Heights Observed by TOPEX Altimeter with Sea Level Data at Chichijima

POLAR GRAVITY FIELDS FROM GOCE AND AIRBORNE GRAVITY

Lake level variations from satellite radar altimetry with retracking of multi-leading edge

AN ASSESSMENT OF SATELLITE ALTIMETRY IN PROXIMITY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN COASTLINE

PROSPECTING FITNESS OF VN-2000 DATUM TO EGM2008

Cotidal Charts near Hawaii Derived from TOPEX/Poseidon Altimetry Data

GOCINO GOCINO. Final Activity Report. GOCE in Ocean Modelling. Specific Support Action. Contract N o SSA5-CT

THE SITUATION IN EASTERN EUROPE ABOUT GEOID / QUASIGEOID MODELS DETERMINATION

Estimation of extreme sea levels from altimetry and tide gauges at the coast

CENTIMETRE LEVEL OF ACCURACY OF QUASIGEOID MODEL IN POLAND

Validation Report: WP5000 Regional tidal correction (Noveltis)

Using satellite altimetry and tide gauges for storm surge warning

Satellite ALTimetry. SALT applications and use of data base for SE-Asia region. SEAMERGES kick-off meeting, Bangkok, Thailand.

Evaluation of the Earth Gravity Model EGM2008 in Algeria

Interannual trends in the Southern Ocean sea surface temperature and sea level from remote sensing data

Seasonal and interannual variabilities of mean velocity of Kuroshio based on satellite data

Inter comparison of wave height observations from buoy and altimeter with numerical prediction

University of Mining and Geology

Proceedings of the First International Conference on Civil Engineering, Assiut University, Volume 2, pp , October 7-8.

D DAVID PUBLISHING. 1. Introduction. 2. Methodology. Truong Thanh Phi

GEOID UNDULATIONS OF SUDAN USING ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS COMPARED WITH THE EGM96 ANG EGM2008

Mass balance of sea ice in both hemispheres Airborne validation and the AWI CryoSat-2 sea ice data product

A Preliminary Attempt of a Quasi-Geoid for Saudi Arabia

Lesson IV. TOPEX/Poseidon Measuring Currents from Space

Satellite Oceanography and Applications 2: Altimetry, scatterometry, SAR, GRACE. RMU Summer Program (AUGUST 24-28, 2015)

Annex VI-1. Draft National Report on Ocean Remote Sensing in China. (Reviewed by the Second Meeting of NOWPAP WG4)

Ocean currents from altimetry

Permanent Link:

A Preliminary Gravitational Model to Degree 2160

Hydrological balance in the large Russian river basins from GRACE satellites

10 Least-squares collocation

Improved description of the ocean mesoscale variability by combining four satellite altimeters

Preliminary Programme (090910)

Coastal Altimetry: recent developments and proposed use in the Agulhas region. Paolo Cipollini (NOCS, UK)

Eddy Shedding from the Kuroshio Bend at Luzon Strait

Development of a coastal monitoring and forecasting system at MRI/JMA

Monitoring Urban Space Expansion Using Remote Sensing Data in Ha Long City, Quang Ninh Province in Vietnam

Coastal geoid improvement using airborne gravimetric data in the United Arab Emirates

Transcription:

This is a Peer Reviewed Paper Determination of Marine Gravity Anomalies in the Truong Sa Archipelago s Sea Territory Using Satellite Altimeter Data NGUYEN Van Sang, VU Van Tri, PHAM Van Tuyen, Vietnam Keywords: Marine gravity anomalies; Satellite altimetry; Least Squares Collocation; Truong Sa archipelago s territory. SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to determine the gravity anomalies on the sea within the Truong Sa archipelago s territory from satellite altimeter data. To accomplish the proposal, the authors have collected and analyzed the satellite altimeter data to propose a satellite altimeterbased gravity anomalies determination procedure. An experiment was then conducted in the Truong Sa archipelago (within the geographic coordinates 6.5 N to 12 N and 112 E to 117.5 E) to evaluate the robustness of the procedure. The experimental results were validated by comparing with the in-situ ship-measured gravity data. Results show that, in order to determine the gravity anomalies from satellite altimeter data, the following steps: (1) the removal of the long-wavelength geoid height using the Global Earth Geopotential Models; (2) the removal of the mean dynamic topography; (3) the removal of the time-varying sea surface topography; (4) the calculation of the residual gravity anomalies emerged from the collocation method; (5) the long-wavelength gravity anomalies restoration by the Global Earth Geopotential Models, must be done. The experimental calculations were done for the study area with 52 cycles of Cryosat-2 satellite (from the 31 st cycle to the 82 st cycle). These marine gravity anomalies are also compared to 625 points of ship-measured gravity. The comparison shows that, the standard deviation between the Cryosat-2 satellite-derived gravity anomalies and ship-measured gravity anomalies is +/- 0.67 mgal. 1

Determination of Marine Gravity Anomalies in the Truong Sa Archipelago s Sea Territory Using Satellite Altimeter Data NGUYEN Van Sang, VU Van Tri, PHAM Van Tuyen, Vietnam 1. INTRODUCTION The latest advances and developments of growing satellite altimetric technology offer numerous applications in the fields of Geodesy, Geophysics, Oceanography, Meteorology, and Environment. A number of studies have been done to determine marine gravity anomalies from satellite altimeter data with improving accuracy and increasing spatial resolution. Hwang and Parsons (1995) determined the marine gravity anomalies using the combination of Seasat, Geosat/ERM, ERS-1, and TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data and ship-measured gravity over the Reykjanes Ridge, and obtained the marine gravity anomaly estimation accuracy of ± 5.76 mgal (Hwang C. and B. Parsons, 1995). In 2002, Hwang et al. used Seasat, Geosat, ERS-1, TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P), and ERS-2 to determine global marine gravity anomalies with a resolution of 2' x 2' (Hwang, C., H. Y. Hsu, and R. J. Jang, 2002). The results were compared with ship-measured gravity data of 12 regions and obtained accuracy from ± 3.057 mgal to ± 13.365 mgal; In 2010, Andersen et al. used Geosat, ERS-1, ERS2, T/P, Jason-1, Envisat, GFO, and ICEsat altimeter data to determine the marine gravity anomalies in order to build the global gravity field model DNSC08GRA with a resolution of 1' x 1' grid (Andersen, O.B., P. Knudsen, and P.A. Berry, 2010). The results were compared with the 321,400 points ship-measured gravity on the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, standard deviation is ±3.91 mgal. In 2010, Andersen built the global gravity field model DTU10GRAV by upgrading the DNSC08GRAV model, with the addition of new ERS-1, ENVISAT altimeter data and improves the accuracy of the calibrations as well as geophysical, altimeter range (Andersen, O.B., 2010). The results of marine gravity anomalies from the DTU10GRAV model were compared with the 321,400 points ship-measured gravity on the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, obtaining the standard deviation of ±3.82 mgal. In 2016, Andersen and Knudsen built the global gravity field model DTU15GRAV based on five-year retracked altimetry data from Cryosat-2 as well as data from the Jason-2 EOL geodetic missions (Andersen, O.B. and P. Knudsen, 2016). The results of marine gravity anomalies from the DTU15GRAV model are compared with 54,000 points of ship-measured gravity collected by Australian Geoscience in 2009. The accuracy of altimetric Gravity calculation is 1 1.5 mgal, and the standard deviation is ±1.81 mgal. Another study conducted by Zhang et al. used Geosat, ERS-1, Envisat, Jason-1, Cryosat-2 and SARAL/Altika altimeter data to determine marine gravity anomalies with a spatial resolution of 1' x 1' (Zhang, S., et al., 2017). The results were compared with ship-measured gravity of the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) survey. Root mean square gain as follows: off-shore southern coast of Taiwan (±5.22 mgal); the vicinity of Philippine s islands (±8.279 mgal). In Vietnam, there are limited studies that use the satellite altimeter data to determine the marine gravity anomalies. Bui et al. combined gravity measured from Gagarinsky and Atlante ships with marine gravity anomalies calculated from satellites altimeter data to establish the Burger gravity anomaly map of Vietnam and vicinity at the scale of 1:1.000.000. The 2

accuracy of the satellite-based gravity anomalies determination is ±8.5 mgal compared to ship-measured gravity (Cong Que, B., et al., 2008); In 2012, Nguyen determined marine gravity anomalies from the combination of ENVISAT altimeter data and ship-measured gravity near the shores and on islands in the East Sea area with an accuracy of about ±6 mgal (Van Sang, N., 2012). In this paper, we focus on the establishing a satellites altimeter-based gravity anomaly determination method and its application in defining gravity anomalies in the sea territory of the Truong Sa archipelago using Cryosat-2 satellite altimeter data. This study a part of a board-class project funded by the Ministry of Ministry of Education and Training, the code B2016-MDA-11ĐT. 2. THE METHOD OF DETERMINING THE GRAVITY ANOMALY FROM SATELLITE ALTIMETER DATA IN THE TRUONG SA ARCHIPELAGO S SEA TERRITORY 2.1. Study area and Data 2.1.1. Study areas Experimental areas are geographically situated within the Truong Sa archipelago s territory (Figure 1) and is located between 6 30'N and 12 00'N in latitude and 112 00'E and 117 30'E in longitude. Figure 1. The experimental area 3

2.1.2. Satellite data Cryosat-2 satellite altimeter data were collected and used to determine gravity anomalies in in the area. It includes 52 cycles and is measured from October 4, 2010 to September 15, 2016. The data were provided by the European Space Agency (ESA). The boundary of the data is 30' larger than the experimental area on the sides. There are 72,483 points in the area, of which the sea surface height were measured by Cryosat-2 satellite altimetry. The distribution of cryosat-2 satellite altimeter data is shown in Figure 2 with a spatial resolution of 3' x 3'. Figure 2. The distribution of cryosat-2 satellite altimeter observation points 2.1.3. The ship-measured gravity data To interpret the results of satellite-derived gravity anomalies, we used the ship-measured gravity data which were made in 1987, 1990, and 1992 under the collaboration project between Vietnam and Russia and between Vietnam and France. The data have high reliability, very clear parameters, and accuracy of ±0.5 mgal (Cong Que, B., et al., 2008). This data are geo-referenced to the international coordinate system WGS-84. However, the measurements were mainly done in the western region of the study area, only 625 observation points were measured within the boundary of the study area (Figure 3). 4

2.2. The method of determining the marine gravity anomalies from the satellite altimeter data Sea surface height is calculated through a geoid height (N) and dynamic topography (hd) using the following formula: SSH = N + h d. (1) Dynamic topography is divided into 2 parts: the mean dynamic topography (hmdt) and the time-varying sea surface topography (ht) (Van Tri V., Van Sang N., et al., 2017). Meanwhile, sea surface heights are represented by the formula: SSH = N + h MDT + h t (2) Geoid height was also divided into 2 components: the long-wavelength geoid height (NEGM) and the residual geoid height. Hence, the formula (2) is re-written as: SSH = N + N + h + h EGM MDT t (3) Ship-measured gravity points Boundary of the gravity anomaly calculated area The boundary of the satellite altimeter data Figure 3. Distribution of ship-measured gravity points in the experimental area From formula (3), to determine the residual geoid height from satellite altimeter data, we needs to firstremove the long-wavelength geoid height (NEGM) from the spherical harmonic coefficients ( nm, nm) of the global Geopotential models by the "remove-restore" technique, C, S, 5

then remove the global mean dynamic topography hmdt, and finally remove the time-varying sea surface topography (ht) by the crossover adjustment method. From the residual geoid height, using least-squares collocation method to determine residual gravity anomalies. And then, using the global Geopotential models to restore the longwavelength gravity anomalies ( gegm) by the "remove-restore" technique. The final results will be the gravity anomalies g. The residual gravity anomalies ( gres) are the difference between gravity anomalies (Δg) and the long-wavelength gravity anomalies ( gegm) computed from the global Geopotential models. This relationship is represented by the following formula: g = g res g EGM (4) The interpolation of residual gravity anomalies from the residual geoid height were done in the similar way as the interpolation of the gravity anomalies from the geoid height, but reduce the influence of the far region data to get more accurate results. The flowchart of the determination of marine gravity anomalies from the satellite altimeter data is illustrated in Figure 4. Sea Surface Height - SSH: Using remove restore technique to remove NEGM: Using the global mean dynamic topography to remove MDT: Using the crossover adjustment method to remove the timevarying sea surface topography (ht). Determination of residual gravity anomalies ( gres) using leastsquares collocation Using remove restore technique to restore gegm: g = gegm + gres 6

Figure 4. The flowchart of the determination of marine gravity anomalies from the satellite altimeter data 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION On the basis of the theory presented above, we have conducted empirical calculations for the study area (latitude: from 6 30' to 12 00'; longitude: from 112 00' to 117 30') with the Cryosat-2 satellite altimeter data. The remove restore technique was applied to remove the long-wavelength geoid height (NEGM) from the global Geopotential model (EGM2008). The global mean dynamic topography (DTU13MDT) of the Technical University of Denmark was then used to remove MDT. After using the crossover adjustment method to remove the time-varying sea surface topography (ht), the residual geoid height map is presented in Figure 4. Figure 5. The residual geoid heights ( N) 7

As a result, the calculated gravity anomalies are as follows: a resolution of 3' x 3' grid, the total score of 12,321 points, the gravity anomalies with the maximum, minimum, and averaged values of +135.44 mgal, -64.11mGal, and 18.11 mgal, respectively. Gravity anomaly map is presented in Figure 6. Figure 6. Marine gravity anomalies determined from Cryosat-2 altimeter data 3.1. Accuracy assessment of the results by comparing with a ship-measured gravity points To assess the accuracy of the satellite-derived marine gravity anomalies, we compared the results with the in-situ gravity of 625 points measured on a ship and the comparison statistics are as follows: The maximum deviation: +1.30 mgal The minimum deviation: -1.82 mgal The average deviation: +0.03 mgal 8

The Standard deviation between the satellite-derived gravity anomalies and shipmeasured gravity anomalies are ±0.67 mgal. In Figure 7, the line graph indicates the frequency of occurrence of the deviation. The comparison also shows that the marine gravity anomalies determined from satellite altimeter data match well with the ship-measured gravity with very small deviations. Small average deviations (0.03 mgal) demonstrates no systemic error between the satellite-derived gravity anomalies and ship-measured gravity anomalies. The trend deviations follow the standard distribution, random nature of the deviation. The accuracy of gravity anomalies in the study area (with the evaluation of 625 measuring points) reaches at ±0.67 mgal. Figure 7. The frequency of occurrence of the deviation 4. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS From the the satellite altimeter data, we can calculate the marine gravity anomaly under process as shown in Figure 4. This determination process is built based on the analyses of the components of the satellite altimeter data with a least-squares collocation method. The marine gravity anomalies on the sea within the Truong Sa archipelago s territory are determined from Cryosat-2 satellite altimeter data achieves accuracy of ± 0.67 mgal when compared with 625-point ship-measured gravity. REFERENCES Hwang C. and B. Parsons, 1995, Gravity anomalies derived from Seasat, Geosat, ERS-1 and TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry and ship gravity: a case study over the Reykjanes Ridge, Geophysical Journal International, 122(2), p. 551-568. Hwang, C., H. Y. Hsu, and R. J. Jang, 2002, Global mean sea surface and marine gravity anomaly from multi-satellite altimetry: applications of deflection-geoid and inverse Vening Meinesz formulae, Journal of Geodesy, 76(8), p. 407-418. 9

Andersen, O.B., P. Knudsen, and P.A. Berry, 2010, The DNSC08GRA global marine gravity field from double retracked satellite altimetry, Journal of Geodesy, 84(3), p. 191-199. Andersen, O.B., 2010, The DTU10 gravity field and mean sea surface, In Second international symposium of the gravity field of the Earth (IGFS2), Fairbanks, Alaska. Andersen, O.B. and P. Knudsen, 2016, Deriving the DTU15 Global high resolution marine gravity field from satellite altimetry, In ESA Living Planet Symposium 2016. Zhang, S., et al., 2017, Inversion of marine gravity anomalies over southeastern China seas from multi-satellite altimeter vertical deflections, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 137, p. 128-137. Cong Que, B., et al., 2008, The mapping of gravity anomalies on the Vietnam coast and the regions, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2, p. 29-41. Van Sang, N., 2012, Detemination of marine gravity anomalies on the Vietnam sea from satellite altimeter data, Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography, Russia. Van Tri V., Van Sang N., et al., 2017, A research on method to determine gravity anomaly in the sea of the Truongsa Archipelago using satellite altimetry and satellite gravity data, Code number: B2016-MDA-11ĐT, The Ministry of Education and Training, Viet Nam. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES NGUYEN Van Sang is a Ph.D. Assoc.Prof., Head of Geodesy Department, Vice Dean of Faculty of Geomatics and Land Administration at Hanoi University of Mining and Geology. He graduated from the Hanoi University of Mining and Geology with an engineer degree in 1999, a master degree in 2006, and from Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK) with Ph.D degree in 2012. He has published 11 international papers, including 4 journals and 7 conference papers. In addition, he has also published 22 domestic papers including 18 journals and 4 conference papers. VU Van Tri is a Ph.D., lecturer of Geodesy Department of Faculty of Geomatics and Land Administration at Hanoi University of Mining and Geology. PHAM Van Tuyen is a PhD student of Geodesy Department of Faculty of Geomatics and Land Administration at Hanoi University of Mining and Geology CONTACTS NGUYEN Van Sang Hanoi University of Mining and Geology No.18, Pho Vien Street, Duc Thang Ward, Bac Tu Liem District Hanoi Vietnam Tel. +84 047368825 Email: nguyenvansang@humg.edu.vn; nguyenvansangtd40@gmail.com Web site: http://humg.edu.vn 10