Math 5801 General Topology and Knot Theory

Similar documents
Math 5801 General Topology and Knot Theory

Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory

Chapter 2 Axiomatic Set Theory

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska

Informal Statement Calculus

Set Theory and the Foundation of Mathematics. June 19, 2018

Tutorial on Axiomatic Set Theory. Javier R. Movellan

INCOMPLETENESS I by Harvey M. Friedman Distinguished University Professor Mathematics, Philosophy, Computer Science Ohio State University Invitation

MAGIC Set theory. lecture 2

Introduction to Logic and Axiomatic Set Theory

Math 144 Summer 2012 (UCR) Pro-Notes June 24, / 15

Axiomatic set theory. Chapter Why axiomatic set theory?

Math 6120 Fall 2012 Assignment #1

Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352

Axiom of Choice, Maximal Independent Sets, Argumentation and Dialogue Games

The Reflection Theorem

Contents Propositional Logic: Proofs from Axioms and Inference Rules

Axioms for Set Theory

Extremely large cardinals in the absence of Choice

hal , version 1-21 Oct 2009

µ (X) := inf l(i k ) where X k=1 I k, I k an open interval Notice that is a map from subsets of R to non-negative number together with infinity

Problems - Section 17-2, 4, 6c, 9, 10, 13, 14; Section 18-1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10; Section 19-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9;

Discrete Mathematics. W. Ethan Duckworth. Fall 2017, Loyola University Maryland

Automata and Languages

CS2742 midterm test 2 study sheet. Boolean circuits: Predicate logic:

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO ZFC. Contents. 1. Motivation and Russel s Paradox

Products, Relations and Functions

This paper is also taken by Combined Studies Students. Optional Subject (i): Set Theory and Further Logic

REU 2007 Transfinite Combinatorics Lecture 9

Set Theory History. Martin Bunder. September 2015

Math 109 September 1, 2016

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes

This section will take the very naive point of view that a set is a collection of objects, the collection being regarded as a single object.

Section 0. Sets and Relations

INTRODUCTION TO CARDINAL NUMBERS

9 FUNCTIONS. 9.1 The Definition of Function. c Dr Oksana Shatalov, Fall

Section 0.7. The Axiom of Choice, Order, and Zorn s Lemma

Russell Sets, Topology, and Cardinals

Homotopy Type Theory. Benno van den Berg. LoLaCo, 29 September 2014

Chapter 0. Introduction: Prerequisites and Preliminaries

Math Fundamentals of Higher Math

Three Profound Theorems about Mathematical Logic

Supplementary Material for MTH 299 Online Edition

SETS AND FUNCTIONS JOSHUA BALLEW

Notes for Math 601, Fall based on Introduction to Mathematical Logic by Elliott Mendelson Fifth edition, 2010, Chapman & Hall

B1.2 Set Theory. Lecture notes HT 2018 Jonathan Pila

CA320 - Computability & Complexity

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH WINTER

Dr. Bob s Axiom of Choice Centennial Lecture Fall A Century Ago

Lecture 2. Least Fixed Points

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH SPRING

Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics.

9/19/2018. Cartesian Product. Cartesian Product. Partitions

Sets, Models and Proofs. I. Moerdijk and J. van Oosten Department of Mathematics Utrecht University

Non-deterministic inductive definitions and Fullness

CMPSCI 601: Tarski s Truth Definition Lecture 15. where

Lecture 8: Equivalence Relations

Gödel's famous incompleteness theorems from the 1930's demonstrate the possibility of unprovable theorems in discrete and finite mathematics.

CHAPTER 0: BACKGROUND (SPRING 2009 DRAFT)

Lecture 1. Econ 2001: Introduction to Mathematical Methods (a.k.a. Math Camp) 2015 August 10

Incompleteness Theorems, Large Cardinals, and Automata ov

Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010)

Math 117: Topology of the Real Numbers

MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017

Foundations of Mathematics

SELF-DUAL UNIFORM MATROIDS ON INFINITE SETS

MATH 145 LECTURE NOTES. Zhongwei Zhao. My Lecture Notes for MATH Fall

MATH 320 SET THEORY BURAK KAYA

Math 421, Homework #6 Solutions. (1) Let E R n Show that = (E c ) o, i.e. the complement of the closure is the interior of the complement.

Hilbert s problems, Gödel, and the limits of computation

MAGIC Set theory. lecture 6

MATH XYZ. 1. Basics: Sets, Maps, Relations,...

Lecture 11: Gödel s Second Incompleteness Theorem, and Tarski s Theorem

Lecture 2: What is Proof?

Math 564 Homework 1. Solutions.

Chapter 3. Formal Number Theory

Section 31. The Separation Axioms

CITS2211 Discrete Structures (2017) Cardinality and Countability

Math/EECS 1028M: Discrete Mathematics for Engineers Winter Suprakash Datta

Axioms as definitions: revisiting Hilbert

1. Propositional Calculus

Essential Background for Real Analysis I (MATH 5210)

1 The Local-to-Global Lemma

The Kolmogorov extension theorem

GENERAL TOPOLOGY JESPER M. MØLLER

A topological set theory implied by ZF and GPK +

COMP9020 Lecture 3 Session 2, 2014 Sets, Functions, and Sequences. Revision: 1.3

MATH 101: ALGEBRA I WORKSHEET, DAY #1. We review the prerequisites for the course in set theory and beginning a first pass on group. 1.

Recursive definitions on surreal numbers

Marie Duží

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:

Sets are one of the basic building blocks for the types of objects considered in discrete mathematics.

Meta-logic derivation rules

Is P Versus NP Formally Independent?

The integers. Chapter 3

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof

COMP9020 Lecture 3 Session 2, 2016 Sets, Functions, and Sequences. Revision: 1.3

17.1 The Halting Problem

AN EXTENSION OF THE PROBABILITY LOGIC LP P 2. Tatjana Stojanović 1, Ana Kaplarević-Mališić 1 and Zoran Ognjanović 2

Kruskal s Theorem Rebecca Robinson May 29, 2007

Transcription:

Lecture 2-8/24/2012 Math 5801 Ohio State University August 24, 2012 Course Info Textbook (required) J. R. Munkres, Topology (2nd Edition), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2000. ISBN-10: 0131816292 Reading for Monday Chapter 1.4-1.6, pgs. 30-43 Reminder: HW 1 for Monday Chapter 1.1: 3a, 4c Chapter 1.2: 2a-b, 4a-b, 5a Chapter 1.3: 2, 4, 11

Fix a universe U with a relation. Everything in U is a set. Any element of a set is itself a set. For example {, {{ }}} Any quantified statement (like x, x x) is quantified over our entire universe U. We will assume U satisfies the following collection of axioms (called ZFC) Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms (EXT) (Extensionality Axiom) Sets are determined by their elements: For all sets A and B, (A = B) iff ( x, x A iff x B) (PAIR) (Pair Set Axiom) The set {x, y} exists: For all x and y, there is A s.t. z, [z A iff (z = x or z = y)] (UNION) (Axiom of Unions) Unions of sets exist: For all sets A there is a set B such that x B iff A A s.t. x A (POW) (Power Set Axiom) Every set has a power set: For all sets A there is a set P such that B, B P iff ( x B, x A)

Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms (SEP) (Separation Axiom) If A is a set and Q(x) is a logical statement which depends on x then the subset of all elements of A satisfying Q(x) exists: A and statements Q(x), B s.t. x, x B iff x A and Q(x) is true. (REP) (Replacement Axiom) If A is a set and f is a function then B = f (A) is a set: For any set A and any statement Q(x, y) ( x A,!y s.t. Q(x,y) is true) implies ( B s.t. y B iff x A s.t. Q(x, y) is true) (EMP) (Existence of an empty set) There is a set which has no elements: There exists E s.t. x, x / E Before we give last three axioms of ZFC need notation: Definition 6 (, {, }, {x A Q(x)},,,, P()) 1. is set given by (EMP). (EXT) implies uniqueness. (See Prop. 7 below) 2. {x, y} is shorthand for the set given by (PAIR). 3. {x} is shorthand for {x, x}. 4. {x A Q(x)} is shorthand for set given by (SEP) applied to set A and statement Q(x). 5. A B is shorthand for statement x, (x A implies x B). 6. A B is shorthand for set given by (UNION) applied to A = {A, B}. 7. A is set given by (UNION) applied to A. 8. A B is shorthand for set {x A x B}. 9. If A then let A A. A is shorthand for {x A B A, x B}. 10. P(A) is set given by (POW).

Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms (REG) (Axiom of Regularity) Every nonempty set A contains an element x with x A =. For all sets A if A then x A s.t. ( y s.t. (y x) and (y A)) (INF) (Axiom of Infinity) There is an infinite set and it contains, { }, {, { }},. There exists S s.t. S and x S, x {x} S. (AC) (Axiom of Choice) Given a set A of nonempty disjoint sets there is a set C which contains exactly one element from each set in A. For all A s.t. ( / A) and ( A, B A,A B implies A B = ) C s.t. A A,!x C s.t. x C A. Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms That s all! IF there is a universe U with a relation satifying: { } (EXT), (PAIR), (UNION), (POW), (SEP) ZFC = (REP), (EMP), (REG), (INF), (AC) then we can do all modern math in U. BUT! Gödel s Second Incompleteness Theorem says Existence of such a universe U is unprovable! So we assume U exists and move on. Someday someone might prove inconsistency of ZFC.

Forget everything you know about set theory. Can only talk about sets that exist due to ZFC axioms. it Note: We can prove existence of some sets without Axiom of Choice (AC). Such sets are constructible. Using (AC) is fine but sets whose existence depends on (AC) are inaccessible. Proposition 7 (Empty set is unique) Let denote the set given by (EMP). Then if the set A satisfies same properties as given in (EMP) then A =. Proof. By (EMP) there exists a set E such that x, x / E. Call it. Suppose there is A s.t. x, x / A. Then x, (x / A) and (x / ). Then x, (x A) and (x ). Then x, ( (x A) and (x ) ) or ( (x A) and (x ) ). Then x, (x A) iff (x ). So by (EXT) A =.

Proposition 8 (Subsets of the empty set are empty) A iff A =. Proof. A = iff x, (x / A) iff x, (x A) iff x, (x A) implies (x ) iff A. Proposition 9 P( ) = { }. Proof. By definition P( ) has property given in (POW). Namely B, B P( ) iff x B, x. By definition { } = {, } which by (PAIR) satisfies B, B {, } iff (B = ) or (B = ). Thus B, B { } iff B =. B P( ) iff x B, x iff B }{{} iff B = iff B { }. Thus B, B P( ) iff B { }. Thus by (EXT) we have P( ) = { }. Prop. 8

Proposition 10 (Miscellaneous properties of sets) If A, B and C are sets then: 1. A A. (Reflexivity) 2. A = B iff (A B and B A). 3. (A B and B C) implies A C. (Transitivity) 4. A A B. 5. A B A. 6. A. 7. A = A. 8. A =. 9. =. 10. B P(A) iff B A. Proposition 11 (More properties of sets) 1. x {y} implies x = y. 2. {a, b} = {x, y} implies ((a = x and b = y) or (a = y and b = x)).

Proposition 12 For any set A we have A / A. Proof. Let A be a set. Suppose A A. By (PAIR) the set {A} exists. A A and A {A} so A {A}. By (REG) there is x {A} such that x {A} =. But x {A} implies x = A implies x {A} = A {A} =. }{{} so A / A. Prop. 11(1) CONTRADICTION. Ordered Pairs in ZFC Definition 13 (Ordered pair) (x, y) = {x, {x, y}}. Proposition 14 (x, y) = (z, w) iff x = z and y = w. Proof. Suppose x = z and y = w. Then {x, {x, y}} = {z, {z, w}}. Thus (x, y) = (z, w).

Ordered Pairs in ZFC Proof of Prop. 14 (continued). Suppose (x, y) = (z, w). Then {x, {x, y}} = {z, {z, w}}. Then (x = z and {x, y} = {z, w}) or (x = {z, w} and {x, y} = z). CASE I: Suppose x = z and {x, y} = {z, w}. Then x = z and ((x = z and y = w) or (x = w and y = z)). If x = z and (x = z and y = w) then we are done. If x = z and (x = w and y = z) then w = x = z = y so (x = z and y = w) and we are done. CASE II: Suppose x = z and x = {z, w} and {x, y} = z. Then x = {x, y}. But then x is a member of itself. CONTRADICTION (Prop. 12) The Cartesian Product We d like to define A B = {(a, b) a A and b B}. Suppose a A and b B. By definition (a, b) = {a, {a, b}}. In order to use (SEP) we need a set which contains each (a, b). a A and {a, b} P(A B). So {a, {a, b}} A P(A B). So {a, {a, b}} P(A P(A B)). Definition 15 (Cartesian Product) A B = { C P(A P(A B)) } a A, b B s.t. C = (a, b). or more informally, A B = {(a, b) a A and b B}.

Functions Definition 16 (Function) Let A and B be sets. A function f : A B is a pair f = (G, B) where G A B and for all a A there is a unique b B such that (a, b) G. If (a, b) G we write f (a) = b. The set dom(f ) = A is called the domain of f. The set codom(f ) = B is called the codomain or range of f. The set graph(f ) = G is called the graph of f. Observations: Let f be a function. Then a dom(f ) iff b B s.t. (a, b) graph(f ). If f and g are functions and f = g then graph(f ) = graph(g), codom(f ) = codom(g). Moreover dom(f ) = dom(g).