LABORATORY CHARACTERISTICS OF GRADED BEEF CARCASSES

Similar documents
QUAL I T Y C H A R A C T E R i S T l C S I N PORK

MEASURES OF MUSCLING IN PORK CARCASSES

Effect of finishing practices on beef quality from Rectus Abdominis and Longissimus Thoracis muscles of Maine Anjou culled cows

Development of Optimal Protocol for Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopic Evaluation of Meat Quality

Image analysis in computer vision: A high level means for Non-Destructive evaluation of marbling in beef meat

The aecond method reviewed by Professor Wilford was that which i s recommended by t h e National Livestock and Meat Board.

FUR BE F FOR EVALUATION* CARCASS AND MEASURING GRADING. i n commercial coolers where it i s impractical t o obtain cold carcass weights,

it can certainly be considered to be strongly predisposing in that d i r e c t i o n.

NIR prediction of pork tenderness. Steven Shackelford, Andy King, and Tommy Wheeler USDA-ARS U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE

ENVIRONMENTAL AND NUTRITIONAL EFFECTS ON BEEF TENDERNESS IN TEXAS

* Presented. 197n. The basic principles, a s outlined above, served as guidelines i n. DR. W R. USBORNE University o f Guelph

- Beall A NEW LOOK A T BEEF CARCASS E V A L U A T I O N PROCEDURES QUAL I TY F A C T O R S

ss VALUE ON L i v f HOGS

Estimation of EUROP- Conformation and Fatness of Beef Carcasses by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis.

E F F E C T OF SEX AND ENERGY L E V E L S

R I C H A R D H m ALSMEYER. MEAT OUAL i T Y L A B O R A T O R Y R E S E A R C HDIVISION, ARS

W. Y. Vaxney.) Van Stavern, B. D Personal communication. Service, Ohio S t a t e University.

CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GROUND B E E F

Changing from recording ultimate ph to drip loss when improving breeding programs for quality traits in pigs

are imperative, It is especially important t o separate toughness caused by

A T 7 5, 1 2 5, 1 7 5, 225, AND 275 POUNOS. Dr. A. Pearson has worked with the p r i n c i p l e of determining volume i n a closed chamber.

or a s t h e t i t l e suggests, " Q u a l i t a t i v e C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e Meat Animal",

ON THE KEEPING QUALITY AND NUTRITIVE VALUE OF PORK

EFFECTS OF B R E E D I N G ON BEEF CARCASS C H A R A C T E R I S t i C S

F A C I L C I I E S N E E D E D, N E A T S REOUIRED AND TCME N E C E S S A R Y FOR

Prediction of beef chemical composition by NIR Hyperspectral imaging

THE. as it i s represented by a choice No. 1 grade as described by t h e Livestock. is meant by these words: Are you including dressing percent?

O R G A H O L E P T I C TESTS DEVELOPED FOR M E A S U R I I G

Growth and Muscle Production

Comparison of methods for the determination the fat content of meat

it behooves us t o consider the basis f o r the use of anyone, o r a combinat i o n of these indices.

ClASS1FtCAtlON OF SUBJECT MATERIAL

MANDIGO. s t e p s involved w i t h c a r c a s s c h i l l i n g, curing, smoking, and f i n a l c h i l l i n g found i n conventional processing.

Proceedings International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, Zurich, /8

GRADING BEEF A RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING AND FOR CARCASS EVAIUATI ON

EFFECT OF D IETARY VITAMIN E L EVEL O N PERFORMANCE AND MEAT QUAL ITY OF L UXI Y ELLOW BROIL ERS

PRESENT & FUTURE 123. i s a sausage lab i n which each c l a s s prepares a t least one emulsion type

Evaluation of Alternative Measures of Pork Carcass Composition

FOOD FACT Proteins contain 4 calories per gram. Protein is a very important nutrient. It makes up most of our body cells, tissues and fluids.

I22. EARLE W. KLOSTERMAN Ohio A g r i c u l t u r a l Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio

P. A. ANDERSON. means t h e placing of a d i f f e r e n t value on products.

R. L. HOSTETLER. s l i d e and a drop of s a l i n e s o l u t i o n added.

may be required in specific cases due to the objectives in mind, but such

A S U R V E Y OF 4-H AND FFA MEATS P R O G R A M S

- FUNOAHElVTAl HISTOLOGICAL NE THODS CONSIDERATIONS

INTRODUCTION. The loss of moisture, shrinkage, associated with carcasses during the post-slaughter chilling, storing and distributing periods is of

MULLINS, F. BOULWARE. Materials and Methods

INFLUENCE OF DIETARY BETAINE SUPPLEMENTATION ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS IN MALE AND FEMALE GROWING-FINISHING PIGS

RALPH W. JOHNSTON of Agriculture

Maine-Anjou. PO Box 1100 Platte City, MO (816) fax (816)

Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1

Chemical Basis of Life

The Caspase System: a potential role in muscle proteolysis and meat quality? Tim Parr

139. ROBERT G. KAUF'FMAN, Gross Muscle Anatomy of Ovine and Porcine, The Meat Quality Machine.

YEAR'S EXPERIENCE CARCASS CUNTEST PROCEDURES. of t h e committee. My assignment has been t o report on a year's experience

Chapter 16: Correlation

UN I FORM CUTTl NG AND METHODS OF MEASURING LAMB CARCASSES

Lectures 3, 9, 10, 11: Prenatal and

Corn Basis Information By Tennessee Crop Reporting District

UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE T E A C H I N G I N MEAT S C I E N C E. meat science seminar and another graduate l e v e l course.

R V I W OF CURi? NT 1 4 N B C4RC4SS R E S E A R C H

Distribution of cesium-137 in reindeer

F. B'. THOWAS NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY

Quantitative characters - exercises

PHYSICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL PHASES OF MEAT RESEARCH

Cells & Cell Organelles. Doing Life s Work

Joy of Science Experience the evolution of the Universe, Earth and Life

What i s t h e U.S.L.A.

Ms. Stacey-Ann Joseph HSB TEST 1

Rapid determination of pork sensory quality using Raman spectroscopy

...E, NEW STATE EXTENSION MEATS. More farms could YORK

02/02/ Living things are organized. Analyze the functional inter-relationship of cell structures. Learning Outcome B1

Nature of matter. Chemical bond is a force that joins atoms

Photosynthesis and Life

b. In Table 1 (question #2 on the Answer Sheet describe the function of each set of bones and answer the question.)

STRUCTURAL AND PALATABILITY TRAITS OF GROUND BEEF HOT BONED, CHILLED AND FROZEN MUSCLE

Review Activity Module 1: Biological Chemistry

Plant Water Stress Frequency and Periodicity in Western North Dakota

Pre-lab homework Lab 4: Movement and Support

C 6 H 12 O 6 + 6O 2 6CO 2 + 6H 2 O

There are a greater number of home freezers and combination freezer-refrigerators than in the past.

171. passed over t h e block w i t h no p a r t i c u l a r designation as t o quality. A s t h e

Biology. Chapter 2 Notes

_-----_--_------_

The Extraction of Lactic acid from Maize (Zea may)

TNE. IHPORTANCE. OF M E A f RESEARCH I N 4 N I H 4 L SCIENCE

1. Matter is anything that has mass and volume. 2. What is the difference between a physical change and a chemical change?

Chapter 6 The Chemistry of Life

Energy and Life. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview. 8.1 Energy and Life

Components of a functional cell. Boundary-membrane Cytoplasm: Cytosol (soluble components) & particulates DNA-information Ribosomes-protein synthesis

Military High School AL- Ain. Grade 10 &11. Biology Sample Questions. Student Name: Computer #:

152. i s t o ensure t h a t lamb i n t h e d i e t permanently s a b s t i t u t e s f o r man! Thus I t o o am a zealous missionary.

BURNETT CENTER INTERNET PROGRESS REPORT. No. 13 -December, 2001

Cells and Tissues PART B

Describe how proteins and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) are related to each other.

a d e f i n i t i o n would be impossible of a p p l i c a t i o n because no one has e s t a b l i s h e d

SWINE E V A L U A T I O N PROGRAMS IN RETROSPECT

Biology. Mrs. Michaelsen. Types of cells. Cells & Cell Organelles. Cell size comparison. The Cell. Doing Life s Work. Hooke first viewed cork 1600 s

Radioactivity. Lecture 14 The Human Radioactivity Cycle

Chapter 2 Chemistry of Life

Transcription:

0. LABORATORY CHARACTERSTCS OF GRADED BEEF CARCASSES A M E R C A N MEAT N S T T U T E F O U N D A T O N *.**..**...*..*...*...*...*.*...* Mr. Chairman, Mr. Franklin, bkmbers of the Conference and Guests: t i s a r e a l pleasure t o t a l k before t h i s group about s o w of the studies that we have carried out a t the American *at n s t i t u t e Foundation on graded beef carcasses. As Mr. Pierce has already stated, t h i s work was carried out under contract with the Livestock Branch of the Agricultural Marketing Service, and the d e t a i l e d r e s u l t s w i l l be presented i n a U.S.D.A. technical bull e t i n t h a t is now being prepared. The report that w i l l give t h i s morning i s a s u m r y of t h e r e s u l t s obtained i n t h i s threeyear study which involved some 53 graded beef carcasses.. ntroduction k n y investigators have determined the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of beef and attempted t o r e l a t e these c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s t o carcass grade and t o organoleptic properties. No attempt w i l l be made here t o review the l i t e r a t u r e on t h i s subject. This report i s a summary of some of the r e s u l t s obtained from a three year study involving 53 graded beef carcasses. The research was supported by contract with the Livestocks Branch, Agricrzltural h r k e t i n g % m i c e, U.S.D.A., and r e s u l t s w i l l be published i n d e t a i l i n a U.S.D.A. Technical Bulletin. Materials and Methods The carcas8 groups selected f o r study are shown i n Table. Three carcasses from each group were selected each year f o r a three year period making a t o t a l of 27 l i g h t, 27 heavy, 36 l i g h t, 36 heavy, and 27 Commercial Cow carcasses. R i b cuts from a l l carcasses and rounds from /3 of the carcasses were removed approximately 48 hours a f t e r s l a u g h k r and transported t o the laboratory. The Longissimus dorsi of the r i b and Semitendinosus muscle of the round were sampled immediately and a f t e r 2 and 4 weeks aging of the cuts a t 3335OF. The d e t a i l s of sampling and procedures used f o r the various determinations are described i n d e t a i l i n a U.S.D.A. Technical Bulletin which i s i n preparation. Results and Discussion Carcass Composition. Based on the ammat of separable lean, f a t and bone i n t h e 90 r i b section, calculated carccss composition values (Table ) indicate that Grade carcasses contained more f a t and less lean and bone than grade carcasaes, with Commercial Cow carcasses i n t e r mediate between the two groups of younger animals. These findings a r e i n agreement with our expectations and coxxfirm results of other investigatore.

. Color of b a n. Lean color of r a w ribeye as determined by comparison with Mmseii Color Plates, was very significcznt.y related t o carcasa grade and extent of aging. The color of Prim grade ribeye uw3 l i g h t e r than t h a t from good o r Commercial grade and aged ribeye was l i g h t e r i n color than unaged ribeye. Marblm. Subjective marbling ratings on raw ribeye indicated t h a t Prim grade ribeye was s i g n i f i c a n t l y better marbled than grade ribeye with Comnercial Cow ribeye intermediate (Table SS). Beavy carcasses i n each grade exhibited aomwhat better ribeye marbling than l i g h t carcasses. Shear Strength. Although the average shear values (/2 inch cylinders) for r a w ribeye f o r the differttnt carca88 groups varied from 4.2 t o 9.4 there was no s i g n i f i c a n t r e l a t i o n s h i p between shear value f o r the r a w ribaye and carcass grade o r weight o r extent of aging. Cooking (broiling) markedly increased t h e shear strength of nngissimus d o r s i but decreased that of Semi.tendinosu6. Aging the raw meat reduced the shear strength of the cooked mat and shear strength of the cooked ribeye was very s i g n f f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t f o r the d i f f e r e n t carcass groups. (Table V). Press Fluid. The data (Table V) show that r a w ribeye from carcasses yielded more f l u l d than t h a t from carcasaes with Commercial carcas8e8 intermediate, Aging reduced the y i e l d of press f l u i d. Cooked ribeye yielded more press f l u i d than raw, b u t t h e r e were no consistent carcass grade o r aging e f f e c t s. Similar results were obtained with the Semitendinosus, Other Physical Tests. Specific conductance, pentetrometer readings, and objective firmness values f o r ribeye and Semitendinosus were not related s i g n i f i c a n t l y t o carcass grade o r weight. n t r a m s c u l a r Fat. ntramacular f a t i n the raw ribeye varied from.5 t o 2 6. m ' i n r a w Semitendinosus from 0.6 t o 9.4%. There were d i s t i n c t differences i n i n t r m s c u l a r f a t due t o carcass grade and weight (Table V). Nonprotein N i t r o e, Amino Nitrogen and Soluble Protein Nitrogen The amount of these nitrogenous components of ribeye and Semitendinosus were not r e l a t e d t o carca88 grade o r weight. During aging the &no nitrogen and nonprotein nitrogen content o f raw meat increased s l i g h t l y but significantly. A t the sa= time the soluble protein content decreased and t o a much g r e a t e r extent than could be accounted for by the increase i n nonprotein nitrogen. Creatine and Creatinine. The creatine content of raw ribeye varied from 95 GTOOg t o 43 mg./l%, and the creatinine content varied from 8 t o 44 mg./loog. There were no conslatent dif'ferences related t o carcass grade o r weight. Aging and cooking increaeed the creatinine content of the meat., Muscle Fiber Diamter. The muscle fiber diameter of samples from Phmcle t i s s u e from older animals had s l i g h t l y l a r g e r f i b e r s than corresponding tissue from younger animals. Fiber diameter in the Semitendinosus was g r e a t e r than i n the ribeye from the same carcass. 40 carcaeses varied from 27 t o 74 microns. m e c l e Bundle Size. Primary muscle bundle cross sectional area i n the samples studied varied from 0.07 t o.47 square millimeters but differences

2. were not associated with carcass grade o r weight. Primary muscle bundles were l a r g e r i n the ribeye than i n Semitendinosus from the same carcassr Elastin Content and E l a s t i n Fiber Diaraeter. On the basis of h i s t o chemical es6imatiori f a r e l a s t i n on samples from 84 carcasses the e l a s t i n cont e n t and e l a s t i n ffber diamter were much g r e a t e r i n the Semitendinosus than i n ribeye. Aging and/or cooking had no detectable influence on e l a s t i n. Collagen. Results obtained on all samples studied did not show any consistent differences in the collagen content of raw o r cooked ribeye due t o carca6s grade o r weight, but the amount of collagen was reduced s l i g h t l y by aging and/or cooking (Table V ). The Semitendinosus contained more collagen than Longissimus d o r s i from the same carcass. h s c l e Fiber Autolysis, Fiber autolysis varied from 0 t o 4 or an a r b i t r a r y subjective r a t i n g scale, but was not consistently related t o carcass grade. Autolysis r a t i n g s were increased by aging, especially during t h e f i r s t two weeks period. Autolysis i n t h e Semitendinosus was much less extensive than i n the ribeye and the e f f e c t of aging was not a6 pronounced. Cooking Losses. The t o t a l cooking 068 durfng b r o i l i n g of steaks from r i b and round of c&rcasse8 studied was not associated with carcass grade o r weight. However, d r i p loss was d i r e c t l y correlated with separable fat, E n d evaporation l o s s was inversely correlated with separable fat] of t h e steaks. Aging reduced d r i p loss m d increased evaporation loss during broiling. Lean Flavor of Broiled Steaks. The panel scores f o r lean f l a v o r of broiled ribeye samples ranged from 5. 2 t o 9.9 and those f o r broiled Semitendinosus ranged from 3.5 t o 7.7. There were pronounced differences i n l e a n flavor scores due t o c a r c a ~ sgrade and extent of aging (Table V). Tenderness of Broiled Steaks. The panel scores f o r tenderness of broiled ribeye ranged from 2.2 t o 9.3 and those f o r broiled Semitendinosus ranged from 3.0 t o 8.2. Tenderness of broiled ribeye vas associated with carcass grade and aging (Table X). The aging e f f e c t wa8 more pronounced on and Commercial grade carcasses than on. Juiciness of Broiled.Steaks. Juiciness score6 f o r broiled ribeye varied from 4.3 t o 9.0 and those f o r broiled Semitendinosus varied from 3.7 t o 8.0. Ribeye f r o m l i g h t grade carcasses was s i g n i f i c a n t l y l e s s juicy than that from other carcass grades and weights. Semitendinosus w&s less j u i c y than ribeye. O t h e r than these, differences i n juiciness were not consistently associated with carcass grade o r weight or extent of aging. Biochemical Properties. The a c t i v i t y of proteolytic and c e r t a i n oxidative enzyme systems i n beef muscle t i s s u e was investigated during the course of these studies. The r e s u l t s indicate that variations i n carcass gsde and weight were not r e l a t e d t o the carbohydrate metabolism of the muscle from the time we received the samples (48 hour6 after slaughter) t o the end of a four week6 aging period. ntramuscular Variation and ntermuscular Differences. Data obtained i n the cour6e of t h i s study'indicated some small but d i s t i n c t d i f f e r ences i n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the Longissimus dorei from one end of the r i b cut

3. t o the other. The posterior portion contsined less f a t but more collagen and had a higher shear strength than t h e a n t e r i o r portion. n broiled ribeye the posterior end as compared t o the a n t e r i o r had higher s p e c i f i c conductance, more zollagen and lower scores f o r lean f l a v o r and tenderness. The center portion of the Semitendinosus contained more f a t, exhibited a g r e a t e r a u t o l y s i s l e v e l and had a lower shear strength than did e i t h e r end, Wscle fiber diameter n t h e Semitendinosus decreased progressively from top &o bottom. Despite t h e quantitative differences between the muscles and withi n %he same muscle, some of the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the two musclee were f a i r l y weu. correlated (Table X) ReSatlonships of Some Chemical, Physical and E i 6 t o l ~ i C a lproperties t o Organoleptic Characteristics.!tenderness of cooked ribeye was very d e f i n i t e ~ associated w i t h carca88 f a t, intramuscular f a t, and marbling (Table X ) e 6 8 s consistent relationships irere shown between tenderness and Specific conductance, lean color o r a u t o l y s i s rating. Tenderness was not s i g n i f i c a n t l y correlated w i t h the collagen content of raw or cooked meat o r with penetrometer readings. Juiciness ~ c o r e 8of cooked ribeye were very eignificantly correlated w i t h carca88 f a t, intramuscular fat, and marbling rating, but showed no con s i s t e n t relationship t o any other properties of the e a t, Lean f l a v o r scores f o r cooked ribeye t ~ r enot consietently related t o any of the other propertiea of the neat. summary On the b a s i s of r e s u l t s from 53 graded beef carcasses t h e following findings appear most s i g n i f i c a n t. grade carcasees were f a t t e r than grade carcassee. Ribeye from grade c a r c a s e e ~as compared t o t h a t from grade had a lower shear strength (raw and cooked), more press f l u i d (raw), g r e a t e r e l e c t r i c a l conductance (raw), more intrarrmscular fat, b e t t e r marbling and b r i g h t e r lean color, More d r i p 066 but l e s s evaporation l o s s wa6 noted after b r o i l i n g rib steaks from as compared t o grade carcasses. The ribeye of broiled r i b steaks from Prius grade c a r c a 6 3 e ~had b e t t e r lean f l a v o r and was more tender than t h a t from grade carcasse6. Juiciness acores f o r ribeye from l i g h t grade carcasees were less than those f o r ribeye f o r other groups of carcasses. For almost a l l these grade differences ribeye from Commercial carcasses ranked between the mean8 f o r and c a r c a s ~ e s. Aged r a w ribeye as compared t o f r e s h had a higher ph and contained higher percentages of nonprotein nitrogen, free amino nitrogen and creatinine but less soluble protein. Aging increased the autolysis l e v e l and improved the color of raw meat. Aging f o r two weeks improved the tenderness and lean f l a v o r of broiled ribeye. An additional two weeks aging period had l i t t l e tenderizing influence and uas detrimental t o fat and lean flavor.

Table Grade and Weight of Carcassee Studied Dates Sampled Wight Grade c 500 800 400 650 Commercial 650 Jan., June, Aug. t t Jan., June, Aug., Oc,. t t Jan., A u g., Oct. Table Carcass Cornpositdon &nge of Different Grades and Weights Separable Lean Se parable Bone k % F rime 46 59 343 6 Eeavy 4557 343 04 5464 230 320 Eeavy 4764 20 20 Commercial Cow 4658 26 44 8 Table.9% 2.00 Corn. cow 2.3, 2.75 3469

5 Table V Thf'luence of Carcass Grade, Aging and Cooking on Shear Strength ( l b s. ) ~ ~~~~~ Raw Xlbeye Raw Semitendinosus Cooked Semitendinosus Cooked Ribeye :: 58 0 aging 2GE.J Cooked Ribeye Cooked &mitendinof3lm3 g. 5 57 90 L9.2 Reavy corn. Ught 6.69.4 5.67.6 5.58.3 89 46 79 '~~~~, 2 weeks cow 93.6 ~ L 8*7 9.9 J > p.. Differences between mans not bracketed together is significant. p / Table V Average ~ r e s sfluid i n $ from ~ongissimusdorsi from Carcasses Sampled i n August

6. 3.,' 4.6 L,J LJ Corn. cow 6.3 Prim 8.J 8.7.L... L..T. t Table V Average Collagen Content ($ by Volume) of Ribeye and Semiteiidinosus from Carcasses Sampled i n August RAV RBEYE 2 8 4.3 *.. 0 3*.7 09..7 08.8 COOKED RBEYE

7. Table V Average eaa Flavor Scores for Ribeye from Carcasses Sampled i n August and January come Cow eavy 7.7, Difference between means not bracketed together is significant corn. cow. 5.6 5,8 6*2J 0 aging 5.5 PriW L, 7.0. 2J 2 weeks 7 2!. (

8. Table X Correlation Coefficients f o r Characgeristics of 2 week6 0 aging Tende r e 6s J u i cines s Collagen, raw Fat, raw Sp. Cond., raw r 23.506** 22 22 38,85.52 23 836M.375* r No..4 24s.076.004.70W,474* Table X Linear Correlation Coefficients Between Tenderness and Other Properties of Ribeye Second Year's Result6 ~. T. Carcass ktt ntramuscular Fat Marbling Rating Shear, cooked Sp. Cond., r a w Autolysis Rating Lean Color Rating Collagen, Raw Collagen, Cooked Penetrometer, Raw * Significant ** Significant No. r.55w+.598w 33*,03 562** 827w.488*.7**..e2.043 No.? 38 36 r.2 97*.333*.5* 070.(23 2 226 86 09 a t S$ level a t % l e v e l CAlJiMAN PEARSON: Thank you, D r. Doty. 0.m next paper t h i s morning i s e n t i t l e d, "Visual Evidence of Beef Q u a l i t y as Associated with Eating Desirability, ' and t h i s paper w i l l be given by D r. R. L. Hiner of the U.S.D.A.

9. DR R, L. XNER, U, S, Dept of Agriculture : M r Chairman, Members of the Reciprocal *at Conference and Guests : The subject that has been aebigned to me is "Viaual Evidence of Beef' Quality a8 Associated with Eating Desirability. " if 8 #. ###.#if i%