Exercises: Similarity Transformation

Similar documents
Math 315: Linear Algebra Solutions to Assignment 6

MATH 2050 Assignment 9 Winter Do not need to hand in. 1. Find the determinant by reducing to triangular form for the following matrices.

Concourse Math Spring 2012 Worked Examples: Matrix Methods for Solving Systems of 1st Order Linear Differential Equations

ODEs II, Lecture 1: Homogeneous Linear Systems - I. Mike Raugh 1. March 8, 2004

t is a basis for the solution space to this system, then the matrix having these solutions as columns, t x 1 t, x 2 t,... x n t x 2 t...

10. State Space Methods

The Eigenvalue Problems - 8.8

Chapter Three Systems of Linear Differential Equations

Application 5.4 Defective Eigenvalues and Generalized Eigenvectors

2 Some Property of Exponential Map of Matrix

Optimality Conditions for Unconstrained Problems

Solutions of Sample Problems for Third In-Class Exam Math 246, Spring 2011, Professor David Levermore

Let ( α, β be the eigenvector associated with the eigenvalue λ i

Then. 1 The eigenvalues of A are inside R = n i=1 R i. 2 Union of any k circles not intersecting the other (n k)

Chapter 6. Systems of First Order Linear Differential Equations

Γ(h)=0 h 0. Γ(h)=cov(X 0,X 0-h ). A stationary process is called white noise if its autocovariance

KEY. Math 334 Midterm III Winter 2008 section 002 Instructor: Scott Glasgow

Let us start with a two dimensional case. We consider a vector ( x,

An Introduction to Malliavin calculus and its applications

System of Linear Differential Equations

Math 334 Fall 2011 Homework 11 Solutions

Math 1. Two-Hours Exam December 10, 2017.

Second quantization and gauge invariance.

Chapter 3 Boundary Value Problem

After the completion of this section the student. Theory of Linear Systems of ODEs. Autonomous Systems. Review Questions and Exercises

Ordinary Differential Equations

3, so θ = arccos

THE GENERALIZED PASCAL MATRIX VIA THE GENERALIZED FIBONACCI MATRIX AND THE GENERALIZED PELL MATRIX

Two Coupled Oscillators / Normal Modes

Tests of Nonlinear Resonse Theory. We compare the results of direct NEMD simulation against Kawasaki and TTCF for 2- particle colour conductivity.

Hamilton- J acobi Equation: Explicit Formulas In this lecture we try to apply the method of characteristics to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation: u t

Lecture 20: Riccati Equations and Least Squares Feedback Control

EE202 Circuit Theory II , Spring. Dr. Yılmaz KALKAN & Dr. Atilla DÖNÜK

MATH 128A, SUMMER 2009, FINAL EXAM SOLUTION

EXERCISES FOR SECTION 1.5

KEY. Math 334 Midterm III Fall 2008 sections 001 and 003 Instructor: Scott Glasgow

We just finished the Erdős-Stone Theorem, and ex(n, F ) (1 1/(χ(F ) 1)) ( n

Hamilton- J acobi Equation: Weak S olution We continue the study of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation:

Homework sheet Exercises done during the lecture of March 12, 2014

14 Autoregressive Moving Average Models

Solutions for homework 12

Section 3.5 Nonhomogeneous Equations; Method of Undetermined Coefficients

non -negative cone Population dynamics motivates the study of linear models whose coefficient matrices are non-negative or positive.

Finish reading Chapter 2 of Spivak, rereading earlier sections as necessary. handout and fill in some missing details!

Optimal Paired Choice Block Designs. Supplementary Material

Announcements: Warm-up Exercise:

SPECTRAL EVOLUTION OF A ONE PARAMETER EXTENSION OF A REAL SYMMETRIC TOEPLITZ MATRIX* William F. Trench. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 11 (1990),

Matrix Versions of Some Refinements of the Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality

2.7. Some common engineering functions. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

DIAGONALIZATION. In order to see the implications of this definition, let us consider the following example Example 1. Consider the matrix

Tracking Adversarial Targets

11!Hí MATHEMATICS : ERDŐS AND ULAM PROC. N. A. S. of decomposiion, properly speaking) conradics he possibiliy of defining a counably addiive real-valu

Supplementary Material: Accelerating Adaptive Online Learning by Matrix Approximation

Computer-Aided Analysis of Electronic Circuits Course Notes 3

Linear Dynamic Models

Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) - State Feedback Design

On linear ODEs with a time singularity of the first kind and unsmooth inhomogeneity

Diagonalization of Matrix

Robotics I. April 11, The kinematics of a 3R spatial robot is specified by the Denavit-Hartenberg parameters in Tab. 1.

Math 10B: Mock Mid II. April 13, 2016

IMPLICIT AND INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREMS PAUL SCHRIMPF 1 OCTOBER 25, 2013

Second Order Linear Differential Equations

Lie Derivatives operator vector field flow push back Lie derivative of

t + t sin t t cos t sin t. t cos t sin t dt t 2 = exp 2 log t log(t cos t sin t) = Multiplying by this factor and then integrating, we conclude that

Chapter #1 EEE8013 EEE3001. Linear Controller Design and State Space Analysis

Homework Solution Set # 3. Thursday, September 22, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Lalo, Second Volume Complement G X

Example on p. 157

MATH 5720: Gradient Methods Hung Phan, UMass Lowell October 4, 2018

Model Reduction for Dynamical Systems Lecture 6

Sliding Mode Extremum Seeking Control for Linear Quadratic Dynamic Game

Chapter 2. First Order Scalar Equations

Lecture 9. Mathematical methods in communication January 10th, 2012 I. INRODUCTION. Lemma 1 f is convex iff g(t) = f (x+tv) is convex in t for all v.

2. Nonlinear Conservation Law Equations

ON THE DEGREES OF RATIONAL KNOTS

Y, where. 1 Estimate St.error

12: AUTOREGRESSIVE AND MOVING AVERAGE PROCESSES IN DISCRETE TIME. Σ j =

Lecture 23: I. Data Dependence II. Dependence Testing: Formulation III. Dependence Testers IV. Loop Parallelization V.

Mark Scheme (Results) January 2011

Math Week 15: Section 7.4, mass-spring systems. These are notes for Monday. There will also be course review notes for Tuesday, posted later.

Linear Algebra Primer

h[n] is the impulse response of the discrete-time system:

Large time unimodality for classical and free Brownian motions with initial distributions

THE 2-BODY PROBLEM. FIGURE 1. A pair of ellipses sharing a common focus. (c,b) c+a ROBERT J. VANDERBEI

Solutions to the Olympiad Cayley Paper

A Note on Superlinear Ambrosetti-Prodi Type Problem in a Ball

LAPLACE TRANSFORM AND TRANSFER FUNCTION

Predator - Prey Model Trajectories and the nonlinear conservation law

Representation of Stochastic Process by Means of Stochastic Integrals

Module 3: The Damped Oscillator-II Lecture 3: The Damped Oscillator-II

NEW APPROACH TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH COUNTABLE IMPULSES

Math 2142 Exam 1 Review Problems. x 2 + f (0) 3! for the 3rd Taylor polynomial at x = 0. To calculate the various quantities:

Linear Cryptanalysis

Homework 10 (Stats 620, Winter 2017) Due Tuesday April 18, in class Questions are derived from problems in Stochastic Processes by S. Ross.

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors. Initialization

WEEK-3 Recitation PHYS 131. of the projectile s velocity remains constant throughout the motion, since the acceleration a x

Outline of Topics. Analysis of ODE models with MATLAB. What will we learn from this lecture. Aim of analysis: Why such analysis matters?

Problem set 6: Solutions Math 207A, Fall x 0 2 x

POSITIVE AND MONOTONE SYSTEMS IN A PARTIALLY ORDERED SPACE

SOLUTIONS TO ECE 3084

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 15 Nov 2016

Transcription:

Exercises: Similariy Transformaion Problem. Diagonalize he following marix: A [ 2 4 Soluion. Marix A has wo eigenvalues λ 3 and λ 2 2. Since (i) A is a 2 2 marix and (ii) i has 2 disinc eigenvalues, we can apply he diagonalizaion [ mehod we discussed in class. Specifically, we obain an arbirary eigenvecor v of λ, say v and, and an arbirary 2 eigenvecor v 2 of λ 2, say v 2 [. Then, we form: Q [ 2 by using v and v 2 as he firs and second columns, respecively. Q has he inverse: [ Q 2 We hus obain he following diagonalizaion of A: A Q diag[3, 2 Q. Problem 2. Consider again he marix A in Problem 5. Calculae A for any ineger. Soluion. We already know ha A: A Q diag[3, 2 Q. Hence: A Q diag[3, 2 Q [ [ [ 3 2 2 2 [ 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 2 3 2 + 2 3 2 Problem 3. Diagonalize he marix A Soluion. Recall ha all symmeric marices are diagonalizable. A is a 3 3 marix. The key is o find hree linearly independen eigenvecors..

From he soluion of Problem, we know ha A has eigenvalues λ and λ 2. x EigenSpace(λ ) includes all x 2 x 3 saisfying x u x 2 v x 3 u for any u, v R. The vecor space EigenSpace(λ ) has dimension 2 wih a basis {v, v 2 } where v (given by u, v ) and v 2 (given by u, v ). Similarly, EigenSpace(λ 2 ) includes all x x 2 x 3 x u x 2 saisfying x 3 u for any u R. The vecor space EigenSpace(λ 2 ) has dimension wih a basis {v 3 } where v 3 - (given by u ). So far, we have obained hree linearly independen eigenvecors v, v 2, v 3 of A. We can hen apply he diagonalizaion mehod exemplified in Problem 5 o diagonalize A. Specifically, we form: Q Q has he inverse: Q We hus obain he following diagonalizaion of A: /2 /2 /2 /2 A Q diag[,, Q. Problem 4. Suppose ha marices A and B are similar o each oher, namely, here exiss P such ha A P BP. Prove: if x is an eigenvecor of A under eigenvalue λ, hen P x is an eigenvecor of B under eigenvalue λ. Soluion. By definiion of similariy, we know A P BP. We proved in he lecure ha λ mus also be an eigenvalue of B. Since x is an eigenvecor of A under λ, we know: Ax λx P BP x λx B(P x) λ(p x) 2

which complees he proof. Problem 5. Suppose ha an n n marix A has n linearly independen eigenvecors v, v 2,..., v n. Prove: for any n vecor x, Ax is a linear combinaion of v, v 2,..., v n. Soluion. Assume ha v i (i [, k) is an eigenvecor of A under eigenvalue λ i. We have Av i λ i v i. Since v, v 2,..., v n are linearly independen, we know ha x mus be a linear combinaion v, v 2,..., v n. Namely, here exis c,..., c n such ha which complees he proof. x c v + c 2 v 2 +... + c n v n Ax c Av + c 2 Av 2 +... + c n Av n Ax c λ v + c 2 λ 2 v 2 +... + c n λ n v n. Problem 6. Prove or disprove: if an n n marix A has rank n, hen i mus have n independen eigenvecors. Soluion. False. Consider n 2 and A v of A mus saisfy: [ Thus, any eigenvecor of A mus have he form dimension of. Problem 7. Prove ha A. I has only one disinc eigenvalue. Thus, any eigenvecor (A I)x [ x 2 {[ is no diagonalizable. R, }. This se of vecors has a Soluion. A has wo eigenvalues λ and λ 2 2. Le v be an eigenvecor of λ. v mus saisfy: Hence, he se of eigenvecors of λ is: This se has dimension. (A λ I)v v R, 3

Le v 2 be an eigenvecor of λ 2. v 2 mus saisfy: (A λ I)v 2 v 2 Hence, he se of eigenvecors of λ 2 is: This se also has dimension. R, I hus follows ha he larges number of linearly independen eigenvecors of A is + 2. Therefore, A is no diagonalizable. Problem 8. Le A, B, and C be hree n n marices for some ineger n. Prove ha if A is similar o B and B is similar o C, hen A is similar o C. Soluion. From he fac ha A is similar o B and B is similar o C, we know: and Hence: which complees he proof. A P BP B Q CQ. A P Q BQP (QP ) B(QP ) Problem 9. Decide wheher A [ 2 4 is similar o B [ 3 2. Soluion. From Problem, we know ha A has disinc eigenvalues 3 and 2. Hence, A is similar o he diagonal marix diag[3, 2. On he oher hand, B clearly also has eigenvalues 3 and 2, and hus, is also similar o diag[3, 2. From he resul of Problem 8, we know ha A is similar o B. 4

[ x y Soluion 2. We will ry o find an inverible marix P z w hold. This is equivalen o AP P B. Hence: [ [ [ [ x y x y 3 2 4 z w z w 2 [ [ x z y w 3x x + 2y 2x + 4z 2y + 4w 3z z + 2w This gives he following equaion se: x z 3x y w x + 2y 2x + 4z 3z 2y + 4w z + 2w x You can verify ha he se of soluions y z is w v [ 2 Le us ry u 2, v. This gives P 2 inverible. We can now conclude ha A is similar o B. u/2 u/2 v u ha makes A P BP u R, v R.. Since de(p ), we know ha P is 5