Unital associahedra. and homotopy unital homotopy associative algebras. Andrew TONKS London Metropolitan University

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 10 Oct 2011

Homotopical Algebra Summer Day in Barcelona 2012

Koszul duality for operads

KOSZUL DUALITY COMPLEXES FOR THE COHOMOLOGY OF ITERATED LOOP SPACES OF SPHERES. Benoit Fresse

Homotopy Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras

Higher Algebra with Operads

Deformation theory of algebraic structures

Operads. Spencer Liang. March 10, 2015

1 Hochschild Cohomology and A : Jeff Hicks

LECTURE X: KOSZUL DUALITY

Deligne s. Kathryn Hess. Institute of Geometry, Algebra and Topology Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Iterated Bar Complexes of E-infinity Algebras and Homology Theories

Homological mirror symmetry via families of Lagrangians

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 30 Mar 2005

Hypercommutative Operad as a Homotopy QuotientofBV

Operad-algebras and homotopy categories

Stasheffs A -algebras and Homotopy Gerstenhaber Algebras. Tornike Kadeishvili A. Razmadze Mathematical Institute of Tbilisi State University

DRAFT DOCUMENT. Benoit Fresse

Erratum to: A Proof of Tsygan s Formality Conjecture for an Arbitrary Smooth Manifold

Moduli spaces of graphs and homology operations on loop spaces of manifolds

A Hodge decomposition spectral sequence for E n-homology

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Remarks on deformation quantization of vertex Poisson algebras

Kathryn Hess. Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011

HOMOLOGY OF GENERALIZED PARTITION POSETS

Kathryn Hess. International Conference on K-theory and Homotopy Theory Santiago de Compostela, 17 September 2008

The Goldman-Millson theorem revisited

arxiv: v4 [math.kt] 11 May 2011

ON THE COBAR CONSTRUCTION OF A BIALGEBRA. 1. Introduction. Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol.7(2), 2005, pp T.

PERVERSE SHEAVES ON A TRIANGULATED SPACE

Derived A-infinity algebras in an operadic context. Contents MURIEL LIVERNET CONSTANZE ROITZHEIM SARAH WHITEHOUSE. 1 A review of known results 2

SECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS

Equivariant Trees and G-Dendroidal Sets

Iterated bar complexes of E infinity algebras and homology theories

Groupoids and Faà di Bruno Formulae for Green Functions

CGP DERIVED SEMINAR GABRIEL C. DRUMMOND-COLE

Erratum to: A Proof of Tsygan s Formality Conjecture for an Arbitrary Smooth Manifold

Grothendieck duality for affine M 0 -schemes.

Higher Prop(erad)s. Philip Hackney, Marcy Robertson*, and Donald Yau UCLA. July 1, 2014

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 5 Jan 2004

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

MODULES OVER OPERADS AND FUNCTORS. Benoit Fresse

TCC Homological Algebra: Assignment #3 (Solutions)

Realization problems in algebraic topology

ON A HIGHER STRUCTURE ON OPERADIC DEFORMATION COMPLEXES

A spectral sequence for the homology of a finite algebraic delooping

OPERAD BIMODULE CHARACTERIZATION OF ENRICHMENT. V2

NOTES ON BASIC HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 0 L M N 0

Math 752 Week s 1 1

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

(communicated by Ross Street)

Introduction to Chiral Algebras

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

The Lambrechts Stanley model of configuration spaces

The Ordinary RO(C 2 )-graded Cohomology of a Point

DISCRETIZED CONFIGURATIONS AND PARTIAL PARTITIONS

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY

Serre A -functors. Oleksandr Manzyuk. joint work with Volodymyr Lyubashenko. math.ct/ Notation. 1. Preliminaries on A -categories

JUVITOP OCTOBER 22, 2016: THE HOPKINS-MILLER THEOREM

An introduction to derived and triangulated categories. Jon Woolf

EILENBERG-ZILBER VIA ACYCLIC MODELS, AND PRODUCTS IN HOMOLOGY AND COHOMOLOGY

Plan Feynman categories Universal constructions. Feynman categories. Ralph Kaufmann. IAS and Purdue University. IAS, Dec

Chromatic unstable homotopy, plethories, and the Dieudonné correspondence

An introduction to calculus of functors

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

The geometry and algebra of master equations, BV operators and Feynman transforms

ON THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF ENRICHED CATEGORIES

Categories and functors

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

ALBERTO CANONACO, MATTIA ORNAGHI, AND PAOLO STELLARI

BERTRAND GUILLOU. s G q+r

arxiv:math/ v3 [math.qa] 9 Oct 2006

Minisymposium on Categorical Algebra, Homotopy Theory, and Applications

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 5

OMEGA-CATEGORIES AND CHAIN COMPLEXES. 1. Introduction. Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol.6(1), 2004, pp RICHARD STEINER

Rewriting Systems and Discrete Morse Theory

A -algebras. Matt Booth. October 2017 revised March 2018

COMBINATORICS OF POLYHEDRA FOR n-categories

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the

On the Merkulov construction of A -(co)algebras

INTRODUCTION TO PART V: CATEGORIES OF CORRESPONDENCES

Bar constructions for topological operads and the Goodwillie derivatives of the identity

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 5 Oct 1999

Extensions of motives and higher Chow groups

370 INDEX AND NOTATION

Identification of the graded pieces Kęstutis Česnavičius

Enveloping algebras of Hom-Lie algebras

AXIOMS FOR GENERALIZED FARRELL-TATE COHOMOLOGY

Multiplicative properties of Atiyah duality

Quillen cohomology and Hochschild cohomology

PROPped up graph cohomology

BATALIN-VILKOVISKY ALGEBRAS AND CYCLIC COHOMOLOGY OF HOPF ALGEBRAS

THE INTRINSIC FORMALITY OF E n -OPERADS

INVERSION OF INTEGRAL SERIES ENUMERATING PLANAR TREES

DGLA STRUCTURE ON THE DEFORMATION COMPLEX OF LEIBNIZ PAIRS. E. Hoefel. Abstract

Topology Hmwk 6 All problems are from Allen Hatcher Algebraic Topology (online) ch 2

J. M. CASAS, (1) J.-L. LODAY (2) and T. PIRASHVILI (3) 1. Introduction

Transcription:

Unital associahedra and homotopy unital homotopy associative algebras Andrew TONKS London Metropolitan University with Fernando MURO Universidad de Sevilla

Outline Classical algebraic definition arises from a topological operad Unital Associahedra: spaces of trees-with-corks D.g. operad ua governing homotopy unital A algebras [Fukaya-Ono-Oh-Ohta, Hirsh-Millès, Lyubashenko] Operad of Associahedra: spaces of trees [Boardman-Vogt, Stasheff] Cellular chain complex D.g. operad A governing homotopy associative d.g. algebras

Outline Algebra Differential graded operads A algebras ua algebras Combinatorics Rooted planar trees with leaves and corks Operations: contracting and grafting Pruning binary trees Cell complexes Classical associahedra Cubical construction Polytope construction Relation to A algebras Unital associahedra Cubical construction Cellular construction Relation to ua algebras

Prototypical d.g. operad: multilinear endo morphisms If (M, d) is a differential graded k-module, consider E M (n) =hom k (M n, M), (n 0) with the identity and substitution operations u =(M id M) E M (1), E M (m) k E M (n) i EM (n+m 1) These satisfy the relations u 1 a = a = a i u and { ( 1) b c (a j c) i+n 1 b ( 1 j < i ) (a i b) j c = a i (b j i+1 c) ( i j < m + i ) for M l a M, M m b M, M n c M in E M.

Definition A d.g. operad O is a sequence of d.g. k-modules (O(n)) n 0, with u O(1), O(m) k O(n) i O(n + m 1) for each 1 i m, satisfying u 1 a = a = a i u and { ( 1) b c (a j c) i+n 1 b ( 1 j < i ) (a i b) j c = a i (b j i+1 c) ( i j < m + i ) for a O(l), b O(m), c O(n). E M is termed the endomorphism operad of M. All operads here will be non-symmetric. [Later: all trees are planar and rooted]

Algebras over d.g. operads An O-algebra is an object M together with an operad morphism O E M (or O(n) k M n M, n 0) Examples Consider the non-symmetric operad A with A (0) =0, A (n) =k (n 1) Then an A -algebra is just an associative algebra. Consider the non-symmetric operad ua with ua (0) =k, ua (n) =k (n 1) Then a ua -algebra is just an associative algebra with unit.

Homotopy algebra Problem: Given two homotopy equivalent complexes A B, A is an O-algebra B is an O-algebra Solution: Replace O by a minimal resolution O O Then A is an O -algebra B is an O -algebra

Theorem (Stasheff 1963) A CW complex is a loop space it is an A -space. The A structure is a lifting of the obvious associative algebra structure on the homology of the a loop space. The following more recent result has the same form: Deligne Conjecture Let A be an associative algebra. The Hochschild cochain complex C (A, A) has a G -algebra structure inducing the known Gerstenhaber algebra structure on Hochschild cohomology.

Koszul Duality for Operads [GK,... ] Consider the adjoint functors Bar and Cobar and the Koszul dual dg AlgebrasOperads 2 B( ) dg CoalgebrasCooperads 2 Ω (C, C, d C ) = Ω ( ) T (s 1 C), = s 1 d C s +(s 1 ) 2 C s ΩBO

A quadratic operad O is Koszul iff the cobar construction of the Koszul dual cooperad is a resolution: quadratic: Ω(O ) O 0 (R) Free(X) O 0 Generators X concentrated in valence 2 Relations R in valence 3 (that is, weight 2) Example: associative operad A Koszul dual cooperad: 0 O Cofree(sX) (s 2 R) 0 Example: (O = A ) A structure on M coalgebra structure on s 1 M

The A operad From the purely algebraic formalism of Koszul duality: A is the d.g. operad such that As a graded operad, it is freely generated by µ n A (n) of degree n 2 (n 2) It has a differential defined on the generators by d(µ n ) = ( 1) qp+(q 1)i µ p i µ q. p+q 1=n 1 i p Thus an A -algebra is a d.g. k-module M with a binary operation m 2 and (higher) homotopies M n mn M, dm n +m n d = ( 1) qp+(q 1)i m p (1 M (i 1) m q 1 M (p i)). p+q 1=n 1 i p

Resolutions of Quadratic + Linear + Constant Operads Let O be an operad admitting a presentation of the form 0 (R) Free(X) O 0 where the ideal is generated by its part of weight 2, R = (R) (k X Free(X) (2) ) R X = 0 Let qr be the quadratic image of the relations, where q : Free(X) Free(X) (2) and define a quadratic operad 0 (qr) Free(X) qo 0 with its classical Koszul dual cooperad 0 qo Cofree(sX) (s 2 qr) 0 Consider the morphism ϕ : qr X k whose graph is R, R = { a ϕ(a) : a qr }

The above data induce a curved cooperad structure (qo, d ϕ, θ φ ) termed the Koszul dual dg cooperad O of O. The operad O is termed Koszul if the associated quadratic operad qo is Koszul in the classical sense. Theorem (Gálvez-Tonks-Vallette, Hirsch-Millès) The cobar construction of the Koszul dual dg cooperad O is a resolution of a Koszul (linear + quadratic + constant) operad O, Examples O := Ω(qO, d ϕ, θ ϕ ) O Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras are quadratic+linear, (a b) ( (a) b) (a (b)) [ a, b ] = 0 Unital associative algebras are quadratic+constant, a 1 a = 1 a a = 0

Appplication: definition of homotopy unital algebras Fukaya Oh Ohta Ono introduced homotopy units into the picture in their work in symplectic geometry. Lyubashenko, Millès Hirsch gave equivalent definitions. Definition ua has underlying graded operad freely generated by µ S n+m O(n), S [n + m], S = m, in degree µ S n+m = 2m + n 2, (n 2ifm = 0), with d(µ {i} 1+1 )=µ 2+0 i µ {1} 0+1 u, i {1, 2}. d(µ S n+m) = ±µ S 1 p+s i µ S 2 q+t, p+q 1=n s+t=m 1 i p S 1 i S 2 =S

Some easy combinatorial structures

Planar rooted trees with corks and leaves v 5 v 6 v 7 v 8 v 9 v 4 v3 v 1 v 2 v 0 v 8 v 4 v3 v 1 Vertices may not have degree two. The vertex order determines the planar structure. Usually we only draw the internal vertices and the corks. In the picture: v 1, v 3, v 4 are internal, v 8 is a cork.

Contraction of inner edges, and grafting at leaf edges v 8 v 4 e v3 v 1 v 8 [e] v 1 2 =

Binary trees with one cork and 2leaves

Pruning of one edge in a binary tree T = e1 e 2 e 3, T \ e 1 =, T \ e 2 =, T \ e 3 =.

Classical associahedra

Boardman Vogt constructed the classical associahedra as / K n = H T, H T =[0, 1] n 2 binary trees T with n leaves and no corks (x 1,...,x n 2 ) H T is a length labelling of the inner edges of T. x 2 x 1 Whenever T /e = T /e then identifies the corresponding negative faces of H T and H T. 0. 0

The associahedra K 3 and K 4 as cubical complexes

The associahedra form a topological operad Operad structure i on the family (K n ) is defined by maps H T H T H T i T given by an insertion of coordinates in a grafting x 1 x 2 2 y 2 y1 = y 2 y1 1 x 1 x 2 = (x 1, 1, y 1, y 2, x 2 ). with an inclusion as a positive face.

Associahedra as polytopes One may forget the cubical subdivision: the associahedron K n can be represented as an (n 2)-dimensional polytope. Its face poset is the category of planar rooted trees with n leaves, no corks and no degree 2 vertices. Inclusion of faces corresponds to collapses T T /e. The unique (n 2)-cell of K n is the corolla C n. We may write K T for the codimension r face of K n corresponding to a tree T with n leaves and r inner edges. Recall: codimension 1 faces of K n are given by K p i K q. These correspond to trees with a unique internal edge e = {v 1, v i+1 }, obtained by grafting corollas C p i C q. More generally K T i K T = K T i T.

K 3. K 4

Associahedra and A algebras Associahedra admit orientations such that the d.g. operad A can be recovered by taking the cellular chains: A = (C (K n, k)) n 2 It is freely generated as a graded operad by the fundamental classes µ n =[K n ] C n 2 (K n, k), n 2, The differential is given by the polytope boundary d(µ n ) = ( 1) qp+(q 1)i µ p i µ q. p+q 1=n 1 i p The exact signs depend on the orientations chosen. That is, the cellular chains on the (polytopal) associahedra gives the operad encoding A -algebras.

Unital associahedra

We define unital associahedra using quotients of cubes, / Kn u = H T, H T =[0, 1] 2m+n 2 binary trees T with n leaves and 0 m < corks (x 1,...,x 2m+n 2 ) H T is a length labelling of the inner edges of T. x 3 x 2 =(x 1, x 2, x 3 ) H T. x 1 If T /e = T /e, identifies negative faces of H T and H T. Of course, both of these faces have the same dimension. However, if T contains a corked edge e, then will identify a negative face of H T with the lower-dimensional cube H T \e indexed by the pruned tree.

0 b a max(a,b) b 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a a 0 0 0

Example: 2-cells H T of the unital associahedron K u 2 These cells correspond to binary trees with 2 leaves and 1 cork: 1 1 1 1 Edges with white corks have length 1 (as do others so labelled)

The unital associahedra form a topological operad Theorem The cubical maps H T H T H T i T given by grafting and inclusion of positive faces x 1 x 3 1 x 2 x 4 y 3 y 2 y1 = y 3 y 2 y1 1 =(x 1, x 2,1, y 1, y 2, y 3, x 3, x 4 ) x 1 x 3 x 2 x 4 are compatible with the identifications. The collection (K u n ) with the induced operations j forms a cofibrant object in the model category of topological operads.

A better cellular structure: cork filtration Theorem There is a sequence of trivial cofibrations K u n,0 K u n,1 K u n,2 K u n where: The first stage Kn,0 u is the classical associahedron Each further stage Kn,m u is the quotient of binary trees T with n leaves and mcorks The cofibrations K u n,m 1 K u n,m are formed by attaching copies of (2m + n 2)-dimensional cells K n+m [0, 1] m. The attachment is along K n+m ([0, 1] m ). H T

The first stage of the cork filtration After the classical associahedron K u n,0 = K n, the next stage in the cork filtration also has a straightforward description: Theorem For n 1 the space Kn,1 u is the mapping cylinder of (σ i ) i : n+1 K n+1 K n, i=1 where σ i : K n+1 K n are the associahedral degeneracy maps.

Stage Kn,1 u of the first four unital associahedra K u 0,1 :, K u 1,1 :, K u 2,1 :, K u 3,1 :

The second stage of the cork filtration: The smallest example is given by trees with no leaves and at most two corks, K 0,2

Remarks Each unital associahedron K u n is a contractible CW complex (but not a poytope). The cells K u T of the unital associahedron K u n are in bijection with the set of all planar rooted trees T with n leaves, m b black corks and m w white corks, in which no vertex has degree two, and the case (n, m b )=(0, 1) is also excluded. The operad composition is cellular: K u T i K u T = K u T i T

Theorem The cells of the unital associahedra admit orientations (inherited by those on K n+m [0, 1] m ) such that the d.g. operad (C (K u n, k)) obtained by taking cellular chains is naturally isomorphic to the operad ua for the homotopy unital associative algebras of Fukaya Oh Ohta Ono.

Final Example: attempting to visualize K u 1,2 This stage of the cork filtration of K1 u indexed by consists of three 3-cells, The first 3-cell (and, symmetrically, the last) has faces.

The second 3-cell has faces of the form

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION