FLIGHT DYNAMIC OF ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT LEPIDOPTERA IN SOMBOR (SERBIA) IN 2009 AND FORECAST FOR 2010

Similar documents
FLIGHT DYNAMIC OF LEPIDOPTERA OF ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE IN SOMBOR DURING 2010 AND FORECAST FOR 2011

What is insect forecasting, and why do it

Jitendra Sonkar,, Jayalaxmi Ganguli and R.N. Ganguli

November 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

September 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

The Palfai Drought Index (PaDI) Expansion of applicability of Hungarian PAI for South East Europe (SEE) region Summary

Republic of Serbia Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia. Drought monitoring and forecasting in Serbia

Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) is an

JRC MARS Bulletin global outlook 2017 Crop monitoring European neighbourhood Turkey June 2017

Research Article Light-Trap Catch of the Harmful Moths Depending of Moonlight in North Carolina and Nebraska States of USA

A STUDY OF PADDYSTEM BORER (SCIRPOPHAGA INCERTULAS) POPULATION DYNAMICS AND ITS INFLUENCE FACTORS BASE ON STEPWISE REGRESS ANALYSIS

Some notes on migrant Lepidoptera species in Norway 1997 (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by R u ñ a r K r o g e n received 2.VI.1999

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2012 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

MORPH forecast for carrot flies

Meteorological Information for Locust Monitoring and Control. Robert Stefanski. Agricultural Meteorology Division World Meteorological Organization

Agrometeorologists for farmers in hotter, drier, wetter future, 9-10 November 2016, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2016 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

Central Ohio Air Quality End of Season Report. 111 Liberty Street, Suite 100 Columbus, OH Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission

Northwest Outlook September 2017

Champaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary

Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis: Bt Corn, Lignin, and ANOVAs

Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary

It is never so good as expected and never so bad as feared.

DROUGHT MONITORING BULLETIN

Helicoverpa zea Trends from the Northeast: Suggestions Towards Collaborative Mapping of Migration and Pyrethroid Susceptibility

CHANGES IN THE NUMBER OF MACROLEPIDOPTERA INDIVIDUALS AND SPECIES CAUGHT BY LIGHT-TRAP, IN CONNECTION WITH THE GEOMAGNETIC Kp AND M-INDEX

RESEARCH REPORT TO: THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR 2009 VegNet Regional Pest Monitoring Program

carbon dioxide +... (+ light energy) glucose +...

2010 Growing Season. Prince Edward County Report

1 29 g, 18% Potato chips 32 g, 23% 2 30 g, 18% Sugar cookies 35 g, 30% 3 28 g, 19% Mouse food 27 g, 18%

H2020-TWINN Guest lecture. 9May2018 Vienna, Austria

Impact on Agriculture

MORPHOLOGICAL, CULTURAL AND PATHOGENIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MACROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA ISOLATES FROM SUGAR BEET

2008 Growing Season. Niagara Region

The flight of the Cameraria ohridella population in the city of Timisoara, Romania

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Drought Monitoring in Mainland Portugal

2006 Drought in the Netherlands (20 July 2006)

Plant Water Stress Frequency and Periodicity in Western North Dakota

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

9/9/ May 2013 JRC CROP YIELD FORECASTING IN SEE Skopje (Macedonia) May 2013 JRC CROP YIELD FORECASTING IN SEE Skopje (Macedonia)

Agrometeorological activities in RHMSS

PERFORMANCE OF NATURAL ENEMIES REARED ON ARTIFICIAL DIETS J.E. Carpenter 1 and S. Bloem 2 1

Understanding the Tools Used for Codling Moth Management: Models

INSECT MANAGEMENT IN SWEET CORN Shelby J. Fleischer Department of Entomology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802

Population Dynamics of Sugarcane Plassey Borer Chilo tumidicostalis Hmpson (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

CONTROLING THE WORM COMPLEX IN ALFALFA. Eric T. Natwick and M. Lopez 1 ABSTRACT

Prediction of Long Distance Migration of Rice Planthoppers to Northern Kyushu Considering Low-Level Jet Stream

Table 1. August average temperatures and departures from normal ( F) for selected cities.

Ganbat.B, Agro meteorology Section

2012 Growing Season. Niagara Report. Wayne Heinen

CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2002

4. МЕЂУНАРОДНА КОНФЕРЕНЦИЈА Савремена достигнућа у грађевинарству 22. април Суботица, СРБИЈА

Global warming and the change of butterfly distributions: a new opportunity for species diversity or a severe threat (Lepidoptera)?

Hibernation and Migration of Diamondback Moth in Northern Japan

SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN BOLLWORM (HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA HUBNER) ON TRANSGENIC BT COTTON

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 21, 2017

JRC MARS Bulletin global outlook 2017 Crop monitoring European neighbourhood

Response of Introduced Sunflower Hybrids to Broomrape (Orobanche cumana W.)

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: May 15, 2014 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Biomes Section 1. Chapter 6: Biomes Section 1: What is a Biome? DAY ONE

ACCURACY OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING PHENOLOGY OF BLACKHEADED FIREWORM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVED PEST MANAGEMENT

Natural Disasters and Storms in Philadelphia. What is a storm? When cold, dry air meets warm, moist (wet) air, there is a storm.

Fire Weather Drivers, Seasonal Outlook and Climate Change. Steven McGibbony, Severe Weather Manager Victoria Region Friday 9 October 2015

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: February 15, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Serbia

Effect of weather parameters on the seasonal dynamics of tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in castor in Telangana State

Central Kansas Prairie Grasslands

SEPTEMBER 2013 REVIEW

1999 Day Precip Comments 2000 Day Precip Comments 2000 Day Precip Comments July January

Thermal analysis of solid and vented disc brake during the braking process

Analysis of meteorological measurements made over three rainy seasons in Sinazongwe District, Zambia.

Sudan Seasonal Monitor

Weather Report 04 April 2018

European Drought Observatory Progress on Drought Monitoring

Insect Pests. Ric Bessin

Seasonal Climate Forecast August October 2013 Verification (Issued: November 17, 2013)

ANNUAL REPORT SUGARCANE ENTOMOLOGY

2011 Year in Review TORNADOES

Attribution of Estonian phyto-, ornitho- and ichtyophenological trends with parameters of changing climate

Effect of Weather Parameters on Population Dynamics of Paddy Pests

Constructing a typical meteorological year -TMY for Voinesti fruit trees region and the effects of global warming on the orchard ecosystem

NEW ZEALAND WEATHER. BRIEF REVIEW OF WINTER AND SPRING 1990 WINTER 1990 (Fig. 1) Weather and Climate (1991) 11: 31-36

SEASONAL RAINFALL FORECAST FOR ZIMBABWE. 28 August 2017 THE ZIMBABWE NATIONAL CLIMATE OUTLOOK FORUM

OVERVIEW OF IMPROVED USE OF RS INDICATORS AT INAM. Domingos Mosquito Patricio

INFLUENCE OF THE AVERAGING PERIOD IN AIR TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT

Monthly Overview. Rainfall

Control of thrips in Allium and Brassica crops

Climate Science, Projections and BoM Capability

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 18, 2017 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP,

METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE JAMAICA CLIMATE BRANCH

March Figure 1: Precipitation Pattern from for Jamaica.

Where is the tropical zone? What are three biomes found in the tropical zone?

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

Module 3, Investigation 1: Briefing 2 The ENSO game: Predicting and managing for El Niño and La Niña

Current Climate Trends and Implications

Weather Conditions during the 1992 Growing Season

Student Name: Teacher: Date: Test: 9_12 Agriculture AP41 - Horticulture I Test 2 Description: Pest Management District: Wake County Form: 501

Northwest Outlook October 2016

South & South East Asian Region:

Transcription:

Acta entomologica serbica, 2009, 14(2): 175-184 UDC 595.78(497.113) FLIGHT DYNAMIC OF ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT LEPIDOPTERA IN SOMBOR (SERBIA) IN 2009 AND FORECAST FOR 2010 DRAGAN VAJGAND Agroprotekt doo, Nikole Pašića 9, RS-25000 Sombor, Serbia E-mail: vajgandd@sbb.rs Abstract Results of the research on the flight dynamic of the species: Loxostege sticticalis, Ostrinia nubilalis, Autographa gamma, Helicoverpa armigera, Spodoptera exigua, Lacanobia oleracea, Mamestra brassicae, Agrotis ipsilon, A. exclamationis, A. segetum and Hyphantria cunea, caught by a light trap in Sombor, have been presented. In addition,their quantity is compared with the average for the long term-period from 1980 to 2004 (VAJGAND et al., 2008). A positive forecast for the first generation in 2009 has been made for the species: O. nubilalis, L. oleracea, A. exclamationis, A. segetum and H. cunea. A negative forecast is made for M. brassicae. For the species L. sticticalis, A. gamma, H. armigera, S. exigua and A. ipsilon, no long term forecast has been made because these are migratory species. During the year 2009 characteristics of temperature and rainfall had a significant influence on the flight dynamic of some species of moths. The temperature was warmer, precipitation was less. O. nubilalis and A. segetum had a third generation. O. nubilalis and H. armigera had a large population, and were an economically important species in Vojvodina. There were few of the hydrophilic species (Mamestra brassicae and L. oleracea). KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, light trap, flight dynamic, Ostrinia nubilalis. Introduction It is important to follow quantities and flight dynamics for warning of possible damage. The forecast is based on the Integral Pest Management in plant protection. Research on moths in the region of Sombor started in 1979 (RADIN & TOŠEV, 1983).

176 D. VAJGAND More than 18,000 specimens of moths have been determined in the laboratory of Agroprotekt in 2009. More than 140 species of moths have been determined. For each of the species the flight dynamic was registered. We have given data about the flight of: Loxostege sticticalis, Ostrinia nubilalis, Autographa gamma, Helicoverpa armigera, Spodoptera exigua, Lacanobia oleracea, Mamestra brassicae, Agrotis ipsilon, A. exclamationis, A. segetum and Hyphantria cunea. Thus it was possible to make a forecast for the species for 2010. To explain results of the flight dynamic, we have compared the values of temperature and precipitation in 2009 with the average values for Sombor for the period from 1948 to 2008. Material and Methods With a 250W mercury light as the light source, Agroprotekt used the light trap type RO Agrobečej for catching moths. The light trap was placed in the southern suburb of Sombor; according to the UTM net, the place was marked CR45. The trap was operational from April 10 th to October 10 th when moths were collected and determined daily in the laboratory of Agroprotekt. Average meteorological data are presented for the period from 1948 to 2008. We are grateful to the the Faculty of Agriculture in Novi Sad for the meteorological data they provided. The temperature curve shows that April was warmer than average by 3 ºC, May by 1.8 ºC, July by 1.7 ºC, August by 2.1 ºC and September by 2.4 ºC. Only June was colder than average by 0.4 ºC (Fig. 1). Figure 1. Meteorological data for Sombor in 2009 and average data for period from 1948 to 2008. The average temperature in the vegetation period in 2009 was warmer by 1.8 ºC, or 10%, compared with the long term period. The total sum of temperature was 323,6 ºC higher than in the average vegetation period. Thus moths had 15 days more of accumulated warmth energy for development. The total precipitation for the period from April to September was 87,8 mm/m 2 less than the average! Only June had 32 mm precipitation more than the average, but this precipitation could not compensate for the deficit of water in the soil from April and May. Hence the year 2009 was very warm and dry compared with the long term period.

Flight dynamic of economically important Lepidoptera 177 Results and Discussion Results of the counting of moths collected using the light trap over a 10-day period are presented in the Tab. I. The results from Sombor for 2009 have been compared with earlier data for Sombor (VAJGAND et al., 2008) (Tab. II). Loxostege sticticalis (Linnaeus, 1761) Beet webworm In Sombor the average number of moths per year is 215 specimens (Vajgand et al. 2008). In 2009 this species was not registered in Sombor. This is the first year without a catch, and the smallest number since 1980. We did not make a long-term forecast because this is a migratory species. Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner, 1796) European corn borer The first specimen was caught on April 29 th. Permanent flight started on May 6 th. Until May 17 th numbers were low but from that date, the daily numbers increased quickly and peaked first on May 26 th : 53 females were registered per night. After this the numbers declined for a few days, and increased later (Fig. 2). The second peak of the first generation and the flight maximum was on June 6 th, when 75 females were registered per night. The end of flight of the first generation was on July 10 th. In 2009, 1649 specimens of the first generation were registered (Tab. II), which is 1.8 times more moths than the average for Sombor (VAJGAND et al., 2008). The second generation started to fly on July 11 th. The number of moths increased fast from the 23 rd ; the peak and the maximum flight of the second generation occurred on August 4 th : 438 females per night. The second peak was on August 21 st, when 121 females were registered per night. The second generation finished flight on September 4 th. 4688 specimens of the second generation were registered in Sombor, which is half of the average for the the long term period for Sombor. A small third generation was registered from September 5 th to 28 th : 115 specimens were caught. The maximum flight of the third generation was on September 18 th. Nine females were registered per night. The percentage of the first generation in Sombor in 2009 was 25.5%, the second 72.5% and the third 2%. August and September of 2009 were dry, but numbers were high, so a large population in the first generation in 2010 is expected. Autographa gamma (Linnaeus, 1758) Silver Y moth Only 90 specimens were caught in Sombor, which is only 16% of the average number (Tab. II). Moths were caught from May 8 th to October 10 th with a few short breaks. The largest number was caught on June 1 st and August 16 th : four specimens per night. In 2009 we have registered no migration in our region. As well, because this is a migratory species no long term forecast was made. Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner, 1808) Cotton Bollworm, Corn Earworm The first four single moths in Sombor were registered from May 13 th to 17 th (Fig. 3). The second period of flight started on June 8 th. Until August 3 rd (with a short pause) a few moths were caught per night. From August 8 th numbers increased until August 20 th, when the maximum of flight was registered (46 moths per night). After this, the number was reduced until September 5 th. Then again it increased until September 20 th,

178 D. VAJGAND when a peak was registered (12 moths per night). Single moths were registered till October 10 th. The total number of moths in Sombor in 2009 was 493. This is only 31% of the average for Sombor (Tab. II), but is much more than the economical level. This is a migratory species, and no forecast has been made. Figure 2. Flight dynamics of Ostrinia nubilalis on light trap in Sombor. Figure 3. Flight dynamics of Helicoverpa armigera on light trap in Sombor. Spodoptera exigua (Hübner, 1808) - Beet armyworm 17 moths were registered in 2009 in Sombor. 12 single moths were caught in the period from July 15 th to August 27 th and five from September 18 th to October 2 nd. This is 49% of the average number in Somber (Tabs. I and II) which was unexpected because this species likes warm weather. This is a migratory species and no forecast has been made.

Flight dynamic of economically important Lepidoptera 179 Lacanobia oleracea (Linnaeus, 1758) Bright-line Brown-eye The moth flying period started on April 11 th, 15 days before the usual time (Fig. 4). The first generation of moths flew until June 27 th. The maximum number was registered on May 20 th : 21 specimens per night. 170 specimens were caught during the first generation flight period which is 84% of the average number for the first generation. The second generation flew from July 12 th to September 17 th. A single specimen was registered without peak or flight maximum. Only 59 specimens of the second generation were registered which is only 29% of the average number. The total sum for 2009 in Sombor is 229 specimens, 56% of the average. L. oleracea in 2009 was important for cabbage and cauliflower. The first generation needs to be sprayed with insecticide several times, and the second generation only once or twice. For 2010 we predict average numbers for the first generation. Damage to cabbage but not to sugar beet can be expected for the first generation. Figure 4. Flight dynamics of Lacanobia oleracea and light trap in Sombor. Mamestra brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758) Cabbage moth Only three specimens of the first generation were registered on May 6 th, 18 th and 23 rd. The second generation was present from July 5 th to 23 rd (eight single specimens), and two single specimens on August 26 th and September 8 th. We registered 13 specimens in all of 2009 in Sombor (Tab. II). This is only 11% of the average number for Sombor. For the first generation in 2010 we make a negative forecast. We expect damage to local cabbage where it is grown in a big area.

180 D. VAJGAND Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel, 1766) Black cutworm, Dark sword grass moth Only a single specimen was registered: four from April 19 th to May 3 rd, eight from June 10 th to July 11 th, and one on August 31 st, and October 3 rd and 10 th (Tab. I). The total is 15 (Tab. II), which is 28% of the average number per year for Sombor. We have not made a forecast for 2010 because this is a migratory species. Agrotis exclamationis (Linnaeus, 1758) Heart & dart The first generation flew from May 18 th to June 11 th with a big break between catches. Eleven specimens were registered. Maximum flight was on May 20 th, with five moths per night. Eleven specimens were registered which is 13% of the average quantity for Sombor. The second generation flew from June 20 th to August 29 th. No maximum flight was registered. The biggest number of moths was present from July 23 rd to 25 th (Fig. 5). The number of registered specimens was 52 (Tab. II) which is only 44% of the average number for Sombor. Figure 5. Flight dynamics of Agrotis exclamationis in light trap in Sombor. We have made a positive forecast for the first generation in 2010: the number of moths was too small for damage to be expected from the first generation of this species. Agrotis segetum (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) Turnip moth In 2009 the moth was present in three generations (Fig. 6). First it was present from May 1 st to June 9 th. The maximum flight was on May 20 th, with five specimen per night. The sum of first generation moths was 21 which is 22% of the average quantity for Sombor. The second generation was present from July 06 th to August 13 th. The maximum flight was on August 4 th. Two peaks of flying were also registered, on July 25 th, and August 10 th (five specimens). There were 49 specimens of the second generation. Single specimens were registered on August 26 th and September 3 rd. The third generation was present from September 7 th to October 9 th. Maximum flight was on September 19 th when seven specimens were registered. The total of specimens in the third generation was 52.

Flight dynamic of economically important Lepidoptera 181 The total sum of moths is 124. This is 38% of the average number for Sombor. Figure 6. Flight dynamics of Agrotis segetum and the light trap in Sombor. Table I. Quantity of moths in a light trap in Sombor during a ten-day period 2009. Species Period L. sticticalis O. nubilalis A. gamma H. armigera S. exigua L. oleracea M. brassicae A. ipsilon A. exclamationis A. segetum H. cunea 12-21.04 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 22.04-01.05 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 02-11.05 0 11 2 0 0 13 1 1 0 3 0 12-21.05 0 318 3 4 0 66 1 0 8 11 1 22-31.05 0 296 1 0 0 24 1 0 1 2 0 01-10.06 0 593 13 2 0 44 0 1 1 5 0 11-20.06 0 272 6 2 0 15 0 1 1 0 0 21-30.06 0 103 5 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 01-10.07 0 55 5 1 0 0 2 3 0 3 0 11-20.07 0 23 5 6 2 6 4 1 4 5 0 21-30.07 0 349 6 8 2 10 2 0 21 16 0 31.07-09.08 0 2361 6 17 3 6 0 0 11 17 2 10-19.08 0 1296 13 145 1 14 0 0 5 8 0 20-29.08 0 576 4 160 4 4 1 0 1 1 0 30.08-08.09 0 90 3 43 0 13 1 1 0 2 0 09-18.09 0 80 11 45 1 6 0 0 0 16 0 19-28.09 0 28 4 52 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 29.09-10.10 0 0 3 6 2 0 0 2 0 10 0

182 D. VAJGAND The dynamics of flight were different compared with the average dynamics (Fig. 6). There were three clear separate periods. The first time the third generation was bigger than the second. The forecast is positive for the first generation in 2010. But because the numbers were so small we think that the first generation of A. segetum cannot be economically important in Vojvodina except in places where damage was done in the last few years. Hyphantria cunea (Drury, 1773) Fall webworm In the locality of Sombor, only three single specimens per night were registered on May 18 th, and August 6 th and 9 th which is the smallest number per year since 1980. (VAJGAND, 1999, 2008; VAJGAND et al., 2008). Compared with previous times, this number is much lower than the average per year for Sombor, which is 396 moths (VAJGAND et al., 2008). According to the quantities in 2009, we expect small numbers for the first generation in 2010; locally, this species can be economically important in 2010 on ornamentals, walnut (Juglans regia) and mulberry trees (Cornus mas). Table II. Number of moths in 2009 in Sombor and comparison with the average for a long term period (VAJGAND et al., 2008). Number of moths of first generation Number of moths of second or second and third generation Total sum per year Species average 2009 average 2009 average 2009 (%) Loxostege sticticalis 1 0 0 0 0 215 0 0 Ostrinia nubilalis 1 940 1649 8222 4803 9163 6452 70 Autographa gamma 1 0 0 0 0 549 90 16 Helicoverpa armigera 2 0 0 0 0 1565 493 32 Spodoptera exigua 2 0 0 0 0 35 17 49 Lacanobia oleracea 1 202 170 205 59 408 229 56 Mamestra brassicae 1 13 0 108 10 121 13 11 Agrotis ipsilon 1 0 0 0 0 39 15 38 Agrotis exclamationis 1 83 11 95 42 178 53 30 Agrotis segetum 1 96 21 232 103 330 124 38 Hyphantria cunea 1 131 1 265 2 396 3 1 2009x100/ average 1 Average for period 1980-2004 2 Average for period 1994-2004 Conclusion All species were less numerous during 2009 than in the long term period (Tab. II). We believe that the main cause of this decline is a very warm and dry vegetation period (Fig. 1).

Flight dynamic of economically important Lepidoptera 183 In 2009 the species L. sticticalis, A. gamma, M. brassicae and H. cunea had less than 16% of the average. Economically important species during 2009 in the same regions were: O. nubilalis, H. armigera, L. oleracea and M. brassicae. Warm weather caused the emergence of the third generation of species O. nubilalis and A. segetum, like in 2008 (VAJGAND, 2009). A positive forecast for the first generation in 2010 has been made and presented for the species: O. nubilalis, L. oleracea, A. exclamationis, A. segetum and H. cunea. Because the species A. exclamationis, A. segetum and H. cunea had small numbers, they can be economically important in 2010 only locally. A negative forecast was made for M. brassicae. For the species L. sticticalis, A. gamma, H. armigera, S. exigua and A. ipsilon, a long term forecast was not made because these are migratory species. Every year flight dynamics have some special characteristics, and the control of the number of these species must be continued. References RADIN, Ž. & TOŠEV, M., 1983. Forecasting of occurrence of Noctuidae on sugar beet in the region of Sombor as a starting point for rational control (1979 1982). Plant protection, Beograd, 34(2) 164: 287 294. VAJGAND, D., 1999. Flight dynamic of Hyphantria cunea and analysis of element of forecast in Sombor since 1980 to 1999 and comparison with data for Novi Sad. In: Anonymous (ed.): Fourth Yugoslav conference for plant protection, Zbornik radova, Zlatibor, 06-10.12.1999: 101. [In Serbian] VAJGAND, D., RADIN Ž., FORGIĆ, G. & TOŠEV, M., 2008. Flight dynamic of economically important Lepidoptera in the Sombor area during 2005 and 2006. Biljni lekar, Novi Sad, XXXVI(1): 18-29. [In Serbian, with English s.] VAJGAND, D., 2008. Flight dynamic of economically important Lepidoptera in the Sombor area during 2007 and forecast for 2008. Biljni lekar, Novi Sad, XXXVI(2): 121-131. [In Serbian, with English s.] VAJGAND, D., 2009. Flight dynamics of economically important Lepidoptera in Sombor during 2008 and forecast for 2009. Biljni lekar, Novi Sad, XXXVII(1): 10-20. [In Serbian, with English s.]

184 D. VAJGAND ДИНАМИKA ЛЕТА ЕКОНОМСКИ ЗНАЧАЈНИХ ВРСТА LEPIDOPTERA У СОМБОРУ ТОКОМ 2009. И ПРОГНОЗА ЗА 2010. ГОДИНУ ДРАГАН ВАЈГАНД Извод У раду су дати резултати праћења динамике лета врста: Loxostege sticticalis, Ostrinia nubilalis, Autographa gamma, Helicoverpa armigera, Spodoptera exigua, Lacanobia oleracea, Mamestra brassicae, Agrotis ipsilon, A. exclamationis, A. segetum и Hyphantria cunea (Табела 1). За праћење је коришћена светлосна клопка типа РО Агробечеј. Резултати су упоређени са вишегодишњим подацима за период од 1980. до 2004. године (VAJGAND et al., 2008) (Табела 2). Ако упоредимо метеоролошке податке за Сомбор из 2009. године са вишегодињим просечним подацима, може се констатовати да је током вегетационог периода 2009. година била много топлија (за 1,8 ºC више) и много сувља (87,8мм по метру квадратном падавина мање). Бројност врста L. sticticalis, A. gamma, M. brassicae и H. cunea је током 2009 године је чинила мање од 16% просечне бројности (Табела 2). Позитивна прогноза за прву генерацију током 2010. године се даје за врсте: O. nubilalis, L. oleracea, A exclamationis, A. segetum и H. cunea. Негативна прогноза се саопштава за врсту M. brassicae. За врсте L. sticticalis, A. gamma, H. armigera, S. exigua и A. ipsilon, дугорочна прогноза се не саопштава јер су миграторне врсте. Врсте O. nubilalis и A. segetum су имале трећу генерацију (Графикони 2 и 6). O. nubilalis, H. armigera, M. brassicae и L. oleracea су током 2009 су биле економски значајне врсте. Received October 21st, 2009 Accepted November 27th, 2009