EEL 6266 Power System Operation and Control. Chapter 5 Unit Commitment

Similar documents
Mechanics Physics 151

An introduction to Support Vector Machine

Mechanics Physics 151

Dual Approximate Dynamic Programming for Large Scale Hydro Valleys

Graduate Macroeconomics 2 Problem set 5. - Solutions

Mechanics Physics 151

Chapter 6: AC Circuits

Ramp Rate Constrained Unit Commitment by Improved Adaptive Lagrangian Relaxation

The Dynamic Programming Models for Inventory Control System with Time-varying Demand

Dynamic Team Decision Theory. EECS 558 Project Shrutivandana Sharma and David Shuman December 10, 2005

Reactive Methods to Solve the Berth AllocationProblem with Stochastic Arrival and Handling Times

, t 1. Transitions - this one was easy, but in general the hardest part is choosing the which variables are state and control variables

On One Analytic Method of. Constructing Program Controls

Math 128b Project. Jude Yuen

Notes on the stability of dynamic systems and the use of Eigen Values.

Solution in semi infinite diffusion couples (error function analysis)

FTCS Solution to the Heat Equation

Variants of Pegasos. December 11, 2009

In the complete model, these slopes are ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR THE COMPLETE TWO-WAY MODEL. (! i+1 -! i ) + [(!") i+1,q - [(!

ISSN MIT Publications

Lecture 11 SVM cont

( ) () we define the interaction representation by the unitary transformation () = ()

Research Article Solving Unit Commitment Problem Using Modified Subgradient Method Combined with Simulated Annealing Algorithm

TSS = SST + SSE An orthogonal partition of the total SS

CS 268: Packet Scheduling

Online Supplement for Dynamic Multi-Technology. Production-Inventory Problem with Emissions Trading

Outline. Probabilistic Model Learning. Probabilistic Model Learning. Probabilistic Model for Time-series Data: Hidden Markov Model

UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA MARCH 2017 EXAMINATION

CS434a/541a: Pattern Recognition Prof. Olga Veksler. Lecture 4

Chapters 2 Kinematics. Position, Distance, Displacement

Ordinary Differential Equations in Neuroscience with Matlab examples. Aim 1- Gain understanding of how to set up and solve ODE s

Lecture 6: Learning for Control (Generalised Linear Regression)

Clustering (Bishop ch 9)

A Tour of Modeling Techniques

APOC #232 Capacity Planning for Fault-Tolerant All-Optical Network

CHAPTER 10: LINEAR DISCRIMINATION

Lecture VI Regression

John Geweke a and Gianni Amisano b a Departments of Economics and Statistics, University of Iowa, USA b European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany

(,,, ) (,,, ). In addition, there are three other consumers, -2, -1, and 0. Consumer -2 has the utility function

Lecture 2 M/G/1 queues. M/G/1-queue

. The geometric multiplicity is dim[ker( λi. number of linearly independent eigenvectors associated with this eigenvalue.

Cubic Bezier Homotopy Function for Solving Exponential Equations

THERMODYNAMICS 1. The First Law and Other Basic Concepts (part 2)

Abstract. The startup cost is considered as an exponential function of off time of a generating unit and the corresponding equation is:

Including the ordinary differential of distance with time as velocity makes a system of ordinary differential equations.

DEEP UNFOLDING FOR MULTICHANNEL SOURCE SEPARATION SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Volatility Interpolation

Discrete Markov Process. Introduction. Example: Balls and Urns. Stochastic Automaton. INTRODUCTION TO Machine Learning 3rd Edition

Keywords: integration, innovative heuristic, interval order policy, inventory total cost 1. INTRODUCTION

CS286.2 Lecture 14: Quantum de Finetti Theorems II

[ ] 2. [ ]3 + (Δx i + Δx i 1 ) / 2. Δx i-1 Δx i Δx i+1. TPG4160 Reservoir Simulation 2018 Lecture note 3. page 1 of 5

Let s treat the problem of the response of a system to an applied external force. Again,

. The geometric multiplicity is dim[ker( λi. A )], i.e. the number of linearly independent eigenvectors associated with this eigenvalue.

ABSTRACT KEYWORDS. Bonus-malus systems, frequency component, severity component. 1. INTRODUCTION

Single-loop System Reliability-Based Design & Topology Optimization (SRBDO/SRBTO): A Matrix-based System Reliability (MSR) Method

Fall 2009 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison. Problem Set 2 Answers (4) (6) di = D (10)

Robustness Experiments with Two Variance Components

Political Economy of Institutions and Development: Problem Set 2 Due Date: Thursday, March 15, 2019.

Density Matrix Description of NMR BCMB/CHEM 8190

Motion in Two Dimensions

Existence and Uniqueness Results for Random Impulsive Integro-Differential Equation

Linear Response Theory: The connection between QFT and experiments

Tight results for Next Fit and Worst Fit with resource augmentation

2/20/2013. EE 101 Midterm 2 Review

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

Implementation of Quantized State Systems in MATLAB/Simulink

Computing Relevance, Similarity: The Vector Space Model

OPTIMIZATION OF A PRODUCTION LOT SIZING PROBLEM WITH QUANTITY DISCOUNT

II. Light is a Ray (Geometrical Optics)

Fall 2010 Graduate Course on Dynamic Learning

Machine Learning Linear Regression

Response of MDOF systems

Comb Filters. Comb Filters

Density Matrix Description of NMR BCMB/CHEM 8190

Modeling and Solving of Multi-Product Inventory Lot-Sizing with Supplier Selection under Quantity Discounts

J i-1 i. J i i+1. Numerical integration of the diffusion equation (I) Finite difference method. Spatial Discretization. Internal nodes.

EEL 6266 Power System Operation and Control. Chapter 3 Economic Dispatch Using Dynamic Programming

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 5: Specification: Choosing Independent Variables (Studenmund, Chapter 6)

Dynamic Team Decision Theory

Genetic Algorithm in Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems

Advanced Macroeconomics II: Exchange economy

Lecture 18: The Laplace Transform (See Sections and 14.7 in Boas)

First-order piecewise-linear dynamic circuits

P R = P 0. The system is shown on the next figure:

A Profit-Based Unit Commitment using Different Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization for Competitive Market

Generation Scheduling in Large-Scale Power Systems with Wind Farms Using MICA

Testing a new idea to solve the P = NP problem with mathematical induction

Unconstrained Gibbs free energy minimization for phase equilibrium calculations in non-reactive systems using an improved Cuckoo Search algorithm

A Novel Efficient Stopping Criterion for BICM-ID System

( ) [ ] MAP Decision Rule

Adaptive Teaching Learning Based Strategy for Unit Commitment with Emissions

Machine Learning 2nd Edition

January Examinations 2012

Li An-Ping. Beijing , P.R.China

Attribute Reduction Algorithm Based on Discernibility Matrix with Algebraic Method GAO Jing1,a, Ma Hui1, Han Zhidong2,b

Pendulum Dynamics. = Ft tangential direction (2) radial direction (1)

CONSISTENT EARTHQUAKE ACCELERATION AND DISPLACEMENT RECORDS

DECOMPOSITION-COORDINATION METHOD FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF A CHAIN OF DAMS

Study on Distribution Network Reconfiguration with Various DGs

Robust and Accurate Cancer Classification with Gene Expression Profiling

Transcription:

EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol Chaper 5 Un Commmen

Dynamc programmng chef advanage over enumeraon schemes s he reducon n he dmensonaly of he problem n a src prory order scheme, here are only N combnaons o ry for an N un sysem a src prory ls would resul n a heorecally correc dspach and commmen only f he no-load coss are zero un npu-oupu characerscs are lnear here are no oher lms, consrans, or resrcons sar-up coss are a fxed amoun 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 2

Dynamc programmng he followng assumpons are made n hs mplemenaon of he DP approach a sae consss of an array of uns wh specfed uns operang and he res decommed (off-lne) a feasble sae s one n whch he commed uns can supply he requred load and mees he mnmum capacy for each perod sar-up coss are ndependen of he off-lne or down-me.e., s a fxed amoun w.r.. me no un shung-down coss a src prory order wll be used whn each nerval a specfed mnmum amoun of capacy mus be operang whn each nerval 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 3

The forward DP approach runs forward n me from he nal hour o he fnal hour he problem could run from he fnal hour back o he nal hour he forward approach can handle a un s sar-up coss ha are a funcon of he me has been off-lne (emperaure dependen) he forward approach can readly accoun for he sysem s hsory nal condons are easer o specfed when gong forward he mnmum cos funcon for hour K wh combnaon I: F cos ( K I ) = mn[ P ( K, I ) + S ( K, L : K, I ) + F ( K, L) ], cos cos cos { L} F cos (K, I) = leas oal cos o arrve a sae (K, I) P cos (K, I) = producon cos for sae (K, I) S cos (K, L: K, I) = ranson cos from sae (K, L) o (K, I) 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 4

The forward DP approach sae (K, I) s he I h commmen combnaon n hour K a sraegy s he ranson or pah from one sae a a gven hour o a sae a he nex hour X s defned as he number of saes o search each perod N s defned as he number of sraeges o be saved a each sep hese varable allow conrol of he compuaonal effor for complee enumeraon, he maxmum value of X or N s 2 N for a smple prory-ls orderng, he upper bound on X s n, he number of uns reducng N means ha nformaon s dscarded abou he hghes cos schedules a each nerval and savng only he lowes N pahs or sraeges here s no assurance ha he heorecal opmum wll be found 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 5

The forward DP approach resrced search pahs N = 3 X = 5 N X X N X Inerval K Inerval K Inerval K + 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 6

Example consder a sysem wh 4 uns o serve an 8 hour load paern Incremenal No-load Full-load Mn. Tme Un Pmax Pmn Hea Rae Cos Ave. Cos (h) (MW) (MW) (Bu / kwh) ($ / h) ($ / mwh) Up Down 80 25 0440 23.00 23.54 4 2 2 250 60 9000 585.62 20.34 5 3 3 300 75 8730 684.74 9.74 5 4 4 60 20 900 252.00 28.00 Inal Condon Sar-up Coss Un off(-) / on(+) Ho Cold Cold sar (h) ($) ($) (h) -5 50 350 4 2 8 70 400 5 3 8 500 00 5 4-6 0 0.02 0 Hour Load (MW) 450 2 530 3 600 4 540 5 400 6 280 7 290 8 500 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 7

Example o smplfy he generaor cos funcon, a sragh lne ncremenal curve s used he uns n hs example have lnear F(P) funcons: df F( P) = Fno load + P dp he uns mus operae whn her lms F(P) F no-load P mn P max P No-load Incremenal Un Pmax Pmn Cos Cos (MW) (MW) ($ / h) ($ / MWh) 80 25 23.00 20.88 2 250 60 585.62 8.00 3 300 75 684.74 7.46 4 60 20 252.00 23.80 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 8

Case : Src prory-ls orderng he only saes examned each hour conss of he lsed four: sae 5: un 3, sae : 3 + 2 sae 4: 3 + 2 +, sae 5: all four all possble commmens sar from sae (nal condon) mnmum un up and down mes are gnored n hour : P F cos = cos Sae Un saus Capacy 5 0 0 0 300 MW 0 0 550 MW 4 0 630 MW 5 690 MW possble saes ha mee load demand (450 MW):, 4, & 5 (,5) = F ( 25) + F2 ( 05) + F3 ( 300) + F ( 20) 735.36 + 20.88( 25) + 8.00( 05) + 7.46( 300) + 23.80( 20) (,5) = Pcos (,5) + Scos( 0, :,5) = ( 986.36) + [( 350) + ( 0.02) ] = 02. 38 Economc Dspach Eq. 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 9 = 986.36 DP Sae Transon Eq.

Case n hour : mnmum a sae (9208) n hour 2: K P cos S cos F cos 5 986 350 02 4 9493 350 9843 9208 0 9208 possble saes ha mee load demand (530 MW):, 4, & 5 P 2,5 = F 25 + F 85 + F 300 + F 20 F cos = cos ( ) ( ) 2( ) 3( ) ( ) 735 + 20.88( 25) + 8.00( 85) + 7.46( 300) + 23.80( 20) ( 2, 5) = P ( 2,5) + S (, L : 2,5) = cos 350 + 9208 0 + 02 ( 30) + mn 0 + 9843 = 20859 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 0 cos = 30 DP Sae Transon Eq.

Case : DP dagram sae un saus capacy hour 0 hour 450 MW hour 2 530 MW hour 3 600 MW hour 4 540 MW hour 5 400 MW hour 6 280 MW hour 7 290 MW hour 8 500 MW 5 690 MW 4 0 630 MW 986 02 9493 9843 30 20860 0933 20492 340 3368 265 32472 48 43953 4 3 43585 4 8964 5265 0 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 0 0 8593 52244 350 350 6869 58828 6490 58449 750 7043 64976 5 6665 64597 5 750 076 74442 5 0393 74074 5 0 0 550 MW 0 9208 0 9208 0648 9857 0828 43300 4 0 8308 5609 0 0 692 57800 750 400 6366 63949 5 750 400 008 73439 5 5 0 0 0 300 MW 5574 5782 0 5748 62930 5 oal cos: 73,439 prory order ls, up-mes and down-mes negleced 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol

Case 2: complee enumeraon (2.56 0 9 possbles) forunaely, mos are no feasble because hey do no supply suffcen capacy n hs case, he rue opmal commmen s found he only dfference n he wo rajecores occurs n hour 3 s less expensve o urn on he less effcen peakng un #4 for hree hours han o sar up he more effcen un # for ha same me perod only mnor mprovemen o he oal cos case : 73,439 case 2: 73,274 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol

Case 2: DP dagram sae un saus capacy hour 0 hour 450 MW hour 2 530 MW hour 3 600 MW hour 4 540 MW 5 690 MW 986 02 30 20860 340 3368 48 43953 4 4 0 630 MW 350 350 9493 9843 0933 20492 350 265 32472 3 43585 4 3 0 60 MW 350 350 9576 9576 06 2022 350 450 32507 3 43503 3 0 0 550 MW 9208 9208 0648 9857 0828 4335 3 5 0 0 0 300 MW 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 3

Lagrange Relaxaon dual varables and dual opmzaon consder he classcal consraned opmzaon problem prmal problem: mnmze f(x,,x n ), subjec o ω(x,,x n ) = 0 he Lagrangan funcon: L(x,,x n ) = f(x,,x n ) + ω(x,,x n ) defne a dual funcon q( ) = mn L( x, x2,) x, x2 hen he dual problem s o fnd q = max q ( ) ( ) 0 he soluon nvolves wo separae opmzaon problems n he case of convex funcons hs procedure s guaraneed o solve he problem 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 4

2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 5 Example mnmze f(x,x 2 ) = 0.25x + x 2 2 subjec o ω(x,x 2 ) = 5 x x 2 he Lagrangan funcon: he dual funcon: he dual problem: ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 0 5 max 2 5 0 = = = = q q q ( ) ( ) ( ) 5 2 & 2,, mn 2 4 5 2 2, 2 + = = = = q x x x x L q x x ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 2 2 5 0.25,, x x x x x x L + + =

Ierave form of Lagrange relaxaon mehod he opmzaon may conan non-lnear or non-convex funcons erave process based on ncremenal mprovemens of s requred o solve he problem selec a arbrary sarng solve he dual problem such ha q() becomes larger d updae usng a graden adjusmen: = + q d fnd closeness o he soluon by comparng he gap beween he prmal funcon and he dual funcon prmal funcon: J * = mn L * relave dualy gap: J q * zero q * ( ) ( ) α, n pracce he gap never reaches 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 6

Lagrange relaxaon for un commmen loadng consran P load N = P un lms U = 0 = KT U P mn P U P mn = K N and = KT un mnmum up-me and down me consrans he objecve funcon T N [ ( ) ] F ( P + Ssar up, U = F P, U ) = = 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 7

Formaon of he Lagrange funcon n a smlar way o he economc dspach problem L ( P, U, ) = F( P, U ) + Pload T = = un commmen requres ha he mnmzaon of he Lagrange funcon subjec o all he consrans he cos funcon and he un consrans are each separaed over he se of uns wha s done wh one un does no affec he cos of runnng anoher un as far as he cos funcon, un lms, and he up-me and down-me consrans are concerned he loadng consran s a couplng consran across all he uns he Lagrange relaxaon procedure solves he un commmen by emporarly gnorng he couplng consran N P U 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 8

The dual procedure aemps o reach he consraned opmum by maxmzng he Lagrangan wh respec o he Lagrange mulpler ( ) ( ) q( ) = mn L( P, U, ) q = max q where done n wo basc seps Sep : fnd a value for each whch moves q() owards a larger value Sep 2: assumng ha found n Sep s fxed, fnd he mnmum of L by adjusng he values of P and U mnmzng L L = = T N [ F ( P ) + S, ] = = N T T { [ F ( P ) + S ] U P U } +, = = U + T Pload = T P, U = = = N load P P U 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 9

separaon of he uns from one anoher; he nsde erm can now be solved ndependenly for each generang un T [ F ( ) + ] P S =, U P U he mnmum of he Lagrangan s found by solvng for he mnmum for each generang un over all me perods mn q N T ( ) [ = { ( ) + ] mn F P S U P U }, = = subjec o he up-me and down-me consrans and U P mn P U = KT hs s easly solved as a wosae dynamc programmng problem of one varable P mn U = S S S U = 0 = = 2 = 3 = 4 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 20

Mnmzng he funcon wh respec o P a he U = 0 sae, he mnmzaon s rval and equals zero a he U = sae, he mnmzaon w.r.. P s: mn d dp [ F + P ] ( P ) [ ] F + P = F ( P ) + = 0 F ( P ) = ( P ) d dp here are hree cases o be consdered for P op and he lms f P op P mn hen mn [F (P ) P ] = F (P mn ) P mn f P mn P op P max hen mn [F (P ) P ] = F (P op ) P op f P max P op hen mn [F (P ) P ] = F (P max ) P max he wo-sae DP s solved o mnmze he cos of each un for U = 0 he mnmum s zero; herefore he only way o have a lower cos s o have [F (P ) P ] < 0 d dp 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 2

Adjusng mus be carefully adjused o maxmze q() varous echnques use a mxure of heursc sraeges and graden search mehods o acheve a rapd soluon for he un commmen problem s a vecor of s o be adjused each hour smple echnque graden componen: heursc componen: α = 0.0 when d d q α = 0.002 when d d = + q d ( ) ( ) d q s posve s negave ( ) d d α q where N ( ) = Pload = P U 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 22

The relave dualy gap used as a measure of he closeness o he soluon for large real-sze power-sysems un-commmen calculaons, he dualy gap becomes que small as he dual opmzaon proceeds he larger he commmen problem, he smaller he gap he convergence s unsable a he end some uns are beng swched n and ou he process never comes o a defne end here s no guaranee ha when he dual soluon process sops, wll be a a feasble soluon * * he gap equaon: ( J q ) q * 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 23

Lagrange relaxaon algorhm usng dual opmzaon updae for all sar pck sarng for = T k = 0 loop for each un solve for he dual value q * ( ) wo-sae dynamc program wh T sages and solve for P and U gap > hreshold solve he economc dspach for each hour usng commed uns calculae he prmal value ( ) J * q * q * gap < hreshold make fnal adjusmens o schedule o acheve feasbly end 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 24

Example fnd he un commmen for a hree-generaor sysem over a four-hour segmen of me assume no sar-up cos and no mnmum up-me or down-me F F 2 F 2 ( P ) = 500 + 0P + 0.002P 00 < P < 2 ( P2 ) = 300 + 8P2 + 0.0025P2 00 < P2 < 2 ( P ) = 00 + 6P + 0.005P 50 < P < 200 3 3 sar wh all values se o zero 3 3 600 400 execue an economc dspach for each hour when here s suffcen generaon commed for ha hour f here s no enough generaon, arbrarly se he cos o 0,000 he prmal value J * s he oal generaon cos summed over all 3 P load ( MW ) 70 2 520 3 00 4 330 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 25

Ieraon : Hour u u 2 u 3 P P 2 P 3 dq()/d P P 2 P 3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 0 0 0 3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 0 0 0 q() = 0.0 J * = 40,000 (J * q * ) / q * = undefned Ieraon 2: dynamc programmng for un #3 =.7 F(P) P = 327.5 P 3 = P mn 3 U 3 = 5.2 52.5 P 32 = P 3 mn.0-700.0 P 33 = P 3 max 3.3 247.5 P 34 = P 3 mn U 3 = 0 = = 2 = 3 = 4 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 26

Ieraon 2: Hour u u 2 u 3 P P 2 P 3 dq()/d P P 2 P 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 2 5.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 0 0 0 3.0 0 0 400 200 500 0 0 0 4 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 0 0 0 q() = 4,982 J * = 40,000 (J * q * ) / q * =.67 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 27

Ieraon 3: Hour u u 2 u 3 P P 2 P 3 dq()/d P P 2 P 3 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 400 200-80 0 320 200 3 6.0 600 400 200-00 500 400 200 4 6.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 0 0 0 q() = 8,344 J * = 36,024 (J * q * ) / q * = 0.965 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 28

Ieraon 4: Hour u u 2 u 3 P P 2 P 3 dq()/d P P 2 P 3 5. 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 2 0.24 0 0 400 200-80 0 320 200 3 5.8 600 400 200-00 500 400 200 4 9.9 0 0 380 200-250 0 30 200 q() = 9,24 J * = 28,906 (J * q * ) / q * = 0.502 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 29

Ieraon 5: Hour u u 2 u 3 P P 2 P 3 dq()/d P P 2 P 3 6.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 2 0.08 0 0 400 200-80 0 320 200 3 5.6 600 400 200-00 500 400 200 4 9.4 0 0 0 0 200 30 0 0 200 q() = 9,532 J * = 36,024 (J * q * ) / q * = 0.844 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 30

Ieraon 6: Hour u u 2 u 3 P P 2 P 3 dq()/d P P 2 P 3 8.5 0 0 0 0 200-30 0 0 70 2 9.92 0 0 384 200-64 0 320 200 3 5.4 600 400 200-00 500 400 200 4 0.7 0 0 400 200-270 0 30 200 q() = 9,442 J * = 20,70 (J * q * ) / q * = 0.037 Remarks he commmen schedule does no change sgnfcanly wh furher eraons however, he soluon s no sable (oscllaon of un 2) he dualy gap does reduce afer 0 eraons, he gap reduces o 0.027 good soppng crera would be when he gap reaches 0.05 2002, 2004 Florda Sae Unversy EEL 6266 Power Sysem Operaon and Conrol 3