EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS FOR A CLASS OF ASYMPTOTICALLY PERIODIC SCHRÖDINGER-POISSON SYSTEMS

Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 207 (207), No. 2, pp.. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS FOR A CLASS OF ASYMPTOTICALLY PERIODIC SCHRÖDINGER-POISSON SYSTEMS DA-BIN WANG, HUA-FEI XIE, WEN GUAN Communicated by Claudianor O. Alves Abstract. In this article, by using variational method, we study the existence of a positive ground state solution for the Schrödinger-Poisson system u + V (x)u + K(x)φu = f(x, u), x R, φ = K(x)u 2, x R, where V (x), K(x) and f(x, u) are asymptotically periodic functions in x at infinity.. Introduction and statement of results For past decades, much attention has been paid to the nonlinear Schrödinger- Poisson system i Ψ t = 2 2m Ψ + U(x)Ψ + φ(x)ψ Ψ q Ψ, φ = Ψ 2, x R, x R, t R (.) where is the Planck constant. Equation (.) derived from quantum mechanics. For this equation, the existence of stationary wave solutions is often sought, that is, the following form of solution Ψ(x, t) = e it u(x), x R, t R. Therefore, the existence of the standing wave solution of the equation (.) is equivalent to finding the solution of the following system (m = 2, =, V (x) = U(x) + ) u + V (x)u + φu = u q u, x R, (.2) φ = u 2, x R. As far as we know, the first result on Schrödinger-Poisson system was obtained in [6]. Thereafter, using the variational method, there is a series of work to discuss the existence, non existence, radially symmetric solutions, non-radially symmetric 200 Mathematics Subject Classification. 5J20, 5J60, 5J65. Key words and phrases. Schrödinger-Poisson systems; ground state solution; variational methods. c 207 Texas State University. Submitted March 22, 207. Published September 22, 207.

2 D.-B. WANG, H.-F. XIE, W. GUAN EJDE-207/?? solutions and ground state to Schrödinger-Poisson system (.2) [,, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 0,, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 20, 2, 2,, 7, 40, 4, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49]. To the best of our knowledge, Azzollini and Pomponio [5] firstly obtained the ground state solution to the Schrödinger-Poisson system (.2). The conclusion they got was that if V is a positive constant and 2 < q < 5, or V is non-constant, possibly unbounded below and < q < 5, system (.2) has a ground state solution. Alves, Souto and Soares [] studied Schrödinger-Poisson system u + V (x)u + φu = f(u), x R, φ = u 2, x R, (.) where V is bounded locally Hölder continuous and satisfies: () V (x) α > 0, x R ; (2) lim x V (x) V 0 (x) = 0, where V 0 satisfy V 0 (x) = V 0 (x + y) for all x R and all y Z ; () V (x) V 0 (x) for all x R, and there exists an open set Ω R with m(ω) > 0 such that V (x) < V 0 (x) for all x Ω. Alves et al. studied the ground state solutions to system (.) in case the asymptotically periodic condition under conditions () (). In case p (, 5), Cerami and Vaira [9] studied the existence of positive solutions for the following non-autonomous Schrödinger-Poisson system u + u + K(x)φ(x)u = a(x) u p u, x R, φ = K(x)u 2, x R, (.4) where a, K are nonnegative functions such that lim x a(x) = a > 0, and lim x K(x) = 0. Zhang, Xu and Zhang [48] considered existence of positive ground state solution for the Schrödinger-Poisson system u + V (x)u + K(x)φu = f(x, u), x R, φ = K(x)u 2, x R. (.5) In their paper, V and K satisfy: V, K L (R ), inf R V > 0, inf R K > 0, and V V p, K K p F, where V p and K p satisfy V p (x + z) = V p (x), K p (x + z) = K p (x) for all x R and z Z, here F = {g L (R ) : ε > 0}, the set {x R : g(x) ε} has finite Lebesgue measure}. On the other hand, when K = 0 the Schrödinger-Poisson system (.5) becomes the standard Schrödinger equation (replace R with R N ) u + V (x)u = f(x, u), x R N. (.6) The Schrödinger equation (.6) has been widely investigated by many authors, see [2, 7,, 4, 8, 2, 29, 24, 4, 5, 6, 42, 4, 46] and reference their. Especially, in [2, 29, 4, 42, 4], they studied the nontrivial solution and ground state solution for problem (.6) in which V or f satisfy the asymptotically periodic condition. In the other context about asymptotically periodic condition, we refer the reader to [22, 25, 26, 9] and reference their. Motivated by above results, in this paper we study positive ground state solutions to system (.5) under reformative condition about asymptotically periodic case of V, K and f at infinity.

EJDE-207/2 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS To state our main results, we assume that: (A) V, V p L (R ), 0 V (x) V p (x) and V (x) V p (x) A 0, where A 0 := {k(x) : for any ε > 0, m{x B (y) : k(x) ε} 0 as y } and V p satisfies V 0 := inf x R V p > 0 and V p (x + z) = V p (x) for all x R and z Z. K, K p L (R ), 0 < K(x) K p (x), K(x) K p (x) A 0 and K p satisfies K 0 := inf x R K p > 0 and K p (x + z) = K p (x) for all x R and z Z ; and f C(R R +, R) satisfies (A2) lim f(x,s) s 0 + s = 0 uniformly for x R, f(x,s) (A) lim s + s = 0 uniformly for x R, 5 (A4) f(x,s) s is nondecreasing on (0, + ), (A5) there exists f p C(R R +, R) such that (i) f(x, s) f p (x, s) for all (x, s) R R + and f(x, s) f p (x, s) A, where A := {h(x, s) : for any ε > 0, m{x B (y) : h(x, s) ε} 0as y uniformly for s bounded}, (ii) f p (x + z, s) = f p (x, s) for all (x, s) R R + and z Z, (iii) fp(x,s) s is nondecreasing on (0, + ), F (iv) lim p(x,s) s + = + uniformly for x R, where 4 F p (x, s) = s 0 f p(x, t)dt. Remark.. (i) Functional sets A 0 in (A) and A in (A5) were introduced by [29] in which Liu, Liao and Tang studied positive ground state solution to Schrödinger equation (.6). (ii) Since F A 0, our assumptions on V and K are weaker than in [48]. Furthermore, in our paper V (x) 0 but in [48] they assumed V (x) > 0. (iii) In [48], to obtain the positive ground state to system (.5), they firstly consider the periodic system u + V p (x)u + K p (x)φu = f p (x, u) x R, φ = K p (x)u 2 x R. (.7) Then a solution of system (.5) was obtained by applying inequality between the energy of periodic system (.7) and that of system (.5). In this paper, we do not using methods that of [48] and we proof the Theorem.2 directly. Since we are looking for a positive solution, we may assume that f(x, s) = f p (x, s) = 0 for all (x, s) (R R ). The next theorems are the main results of the present paper. Theorem.2. Suppose that (A) (A5) are satisfied. positive ground state solution. Then system (.5) has a Theorem.. Suppose that V (x) V p (x), K(x) K p (x) satisfy (A), and f(x, s) f p (x, s) satisfies (A2) (A5). Then system (.5) has a positive ground state solution. 2. Variational framework and preliminary results The letter C and C i will be repeatedly used to denote various positive constants whose exact values are irrelevant. B R (z) denotes the open ball centered at z with

4 D.-B. WANG, H.-F. XIE, W. GUAN EJDE-207/?? radius R. We denote the standard norm of L p by u p = ( u p dx) /p and u R = ess sup x R u. The Sobolev space H (R ) is endowed with the norm u 2 H := ( u 2 + u 2 )dx. R The space D,2 (R ) is endowed with the standard norm u 2 D,2 := R u 2 dx. Let E := {u L 6 (R ) : u L 2 (R ) and V (x)u 2 dx < } be the Sobolev R space endowed with the norm u 2 := ( u 2 + V (x)u 2 )dx. R Lemma 2.. [29] Suppose (A) holds. Then there exists two positive constants C and C 2 such that C u 2 H u C 2 u 2 H for all u E. Moreover, E Lp (R ) for any p [2, 6] is continuous. System (.5) can be transformed into a Schrödinger equation with a nonlocal term. In fact, for all u E (then u H (R )), considering the linear functional L u defined in D,2 (R ) by L u (v) = K(x)u 2 vdx. R According to the Hölder inequality and lemma (2.), one has that L u (v) K u 2 2/5 v 6 C u 2 v D,2. (2.) So, by the Lax-Milgram theorem exists an unique φ u D,2 (R ) such that φ u v dx = (φ u, v) D,2 = L u (v) = K(x)u 2 v dx, R R for any v D,2 (R ) and φ u D,2 C u 2. Namely, φ u is the unique solution of Moreover, φ u can be expressed as φ u = C φ = K(x)u 2, x R. R K(y)u 2 (y) dy. x y Substituting φ u into the system (.5), we obtain u + V (x)u + K(x)φ u u = f(x, u), x R. (2.2) By (2.), we get K(x)φ u u 2 dx C u 4. (2.) R So the energy functional I : H (R ) R corresponding to (2.2) is given by I(u) = ( u 2 + V (x)u 2 )dx + K(x)φ u u 2 dx F (x, u)dx, 2 R 4 R R where F (x, s) = s f(x, t)dt. 0

EJDE-207/2 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS 5 Moreover, under our condition, I belongs to C, so the Fréchet derivative of I is I (u), v = ( u v + V (x)uv)dx + K(x)φ u uvdx f(x, u)vdx R R R and (u, φ) H (R ) D,2 (R ) is a solution of system (.5) if and only if u H (R ) is a critical point of I and φ = φ u. For all u E, let φ u D,2 (R ) is unique solution of the following equation Moreover, φ u can be expressed as φ u = C φ = K p (x)u 2, x R. R K p (y)u 2 (y) dy. x y Let I p (u) = ( u 2 + V p (x)u 2 )dx + K p (x) φ u u 2 dx F p (x, u)dx, 2 R 4 R R where F p (x, s) = s 0 f p(x, t)dt. Then I p is the energy functional corresponding to the equation u + V p (x)u + K p (x) φ u u = f p (x, u), x R. (2.4) It is easy to see that (u, φ) H (R ) D,2 (R ) is a solution of periodic system (.7) if and only if u H (R ) is a critical point of I p and φ = φ u. Lemma 2.2. Suppose (A) holds. Then K p (x) φ u( +z) u 2 ( + z)dx = R K p (x) φ u u 2 dx, R z Z, u E. Lemma 2.. Suppose that (A2), (A4), (A5) hold. Then (i) 4 f(x, s)s F (x, s) 0 for all (x, s) R R, (ii) 4 f p(x, s)s F p (x, s) 0 for all (x, s) R R. The proof of the above lemma is similar to that in [], so we omitted here. Lemma 2.4. Operator I is weakly sequentially continuous. Namely if u n u in E, I (u n ) I (u) in E. The proof of the above lemma is similar to that of in [48], so we omitted here. Lemma 2.5 ([29]). Suppose that (A2), (A), (A5)(i) hold. Assume that {u n } is bounded in E and u n 0 in L s loc (R ), for any s [2, 6). Then up to a subsequence, one has R (F (x, u n ) F p (x, u n ))dx = o n (). Lemma 2.6 ([29]). Suppose that (A), (A2), (A) (A5)(i) hold. Assume that {u n } is bounded in E and z n. Then any ϕ C 0 (R ), one has R (V p (x) V (x))u n ϕ( z n )dx = o n (), R (f(x, u n ) f p (x, u n ))ϕ( z n )dx = o n ().

6 D.-B. WANG, H.-F. XIE, W. GUAN EJDE-207/?? Lemma 2.7. Suppose that (A), (A2), (A), (A5)(i) hold. Assume that u n 0 in E. Then up to a subsequence, one has R (K(x)φ un u n ϕ( z n ) K p (x) φ un u n ϕ( z n ))dx = o n (), where z n and ϕ C 0 (R ). Proof. Set h(x) := K(x) K p (x). By (A), we have h(x) A 0. Then for any ε > 0, there exists R ε > 0 such that m{x B (y) : h(x) ε} < ε, for any y R ε. We cover R by balls B (y i ), i N. In such a way that each point of R is contained in at most N + balls. Without any loss of generality, we suppose that y i < R ε, i =, 2,..., n ε and y i R ε, i = n ε +, n ε + 2, n ε +,..., +. Then (K(x)φ un u n ϕ( z n ) K p (x) φ un u n ϕ( z n ))dx R K p (y)u n (y)ϕ(y z n ) = dyh(x)u 2 R R x y n(x)dx K p (y)u 2 + n(y) dyh(x)u n (x)ϕ(x z n )dx x y + R R R R := E + E 2 + E h(y)u 2 n(y) dyh(x)u n (x)ϕ(x z n )dx x y As in [48], we define K p (y)u n (y)ϕ(y z n ) H(x) := dy R x y K p (y)u n (y)ϕ(y z n ) = dy {y: x y } x y K p (y)u n (y)ϕ(y z n ) + dy. x y {y: x y >} By the Hölder inequality and the Sobolev embedding, we have H(x) K p u n ϕ 6 ( {y: x y } ( + K p u n 2 ϕ 4 {y: x y >} ( C {z: z } x y 2 dy ) /2 x y 4 dy ) /4 z 2 dz ) /2 + C ( {z: z >} So, sup x R H(x) <. Then, we obtain E = H(x)h(x)u 2 n(x)dx R + {x: h(x) ε} := Q + Q 2 {x: h(x) <ε} z 4 dz ) /4.

EJDE-207/2 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS 7 Q = Q = = {x: h(x) ε} {x: h(x) ε, x >R ε+} + {x: h(x) ε, x R ε+} n ε+ {x B (y i): h(x) ε, x >R ε+} + 2 sup x R H(x) K p := Q + Q 2 n ε+ {x B (y i): h(x) ε, x >R ε+} 2 sup H(x) K p x R C n ε+ ( C ε 2/ n ε+ ( m{x B (y) : h(x) ε} {x B (y i): h(x) ε, x >R ε+} n ε+ B Rε+ u n (x) 2 dx {x B (y i): h(x) ε, x >R ε+} ) 2/ ) / u 6 n(x) dx {x B (y i): h(x) ε, x >R ε+} C (N + )ε 2/ R ( u n 2 + u 2 n)dx C 2 ε 2/. ( u n 2 + u 2 n)dx Letting ε 0, we obtain Q 0. Since u n 0, one has that Q 2 0. So, Q = Q + Q 2 0. Q 2 = {x: h(x) <ε} ε sup H(x) u 2 n(x) dx Cε. x R R u 2 n(x) dx Let ε 0, we have Q 2 0. Therefore, from the above fact we get that E 0. In the same way, we can prove E 2 0 and E 0. We define N := {u E \{0} : (I (u), u) = 0}. Then N is a Nehari type associate to I, and set c := inf u N I. Let F := {u E : u + 0}, where u ± = max{±u, 0}. In fact N = {u F : (I (u), u) = 0}. Lemma 2.8. Suppose that (A) (A5) hold. For any u F, there is a unique t u > 0 such that t u u N. Moreover, the maximum of I(tu) for t 0 is achieved.

8 D.-B. WANG, H.-F. XIE, W. GUAN EJDE-207/?? Proof. Define g(t) := I(tu), t 0. Using (A2), (A) and (A5), we can prove that g(0) = 0, g(t) > 0 for t small and g(t) < 0 for t large. In fact, by (A2) and (A), for all ε > 0 there exists a C ε > 0 such that Then f(x, s) ε s + C ε s 5, F (x, s) ε 2 s 2 + C ε 6 s 6, s R. g(t) = t2 2 u 2 + t4 K(x)φ u u 2 dx F (x, tu)dx 4 R R = t2 2 u 2 + t4 K(x)φ u u 2 dx F (x, tu)dx 4 R R t2 2 u 2 εt 2 u 2 dx C ε t 6 u 6 dx R R t2 2 u 2 Cεt 2 u 2 C ε t 6 u 6. Hence, g(0) = 0, g(t) > 0 for t small. Set Ω := {x R : u(x) > 0}, by using Fatou lemma and (A5), we have F (x, tu) lim inf t + (tu) 4 u 4 F p (x, tu) dx lim inf t + (tu) 4 u 4 dx = +. Hence lim sup t + g(t) t 4 = lim sup t + = lim sup t + Ω 2t 2 u 4 + 4 2t 2 u 4 + 4 K(x)φ u u 2 dx lim inf R t + K(x)φ u u 2 dx lim inf R t + Ω R Ω F (x, tu) t 4 dx F (x, tu) (tu) 4 u 4 dx =, which deduces g(t) as t +. Therefore, there exists a t u such that I(t u u) = max t>0 I(tu) and t u u N. Suppose that there exist t u > t u > 0 such that t uu, t u u N. Then, We have R (t u) 2 u 2 + K(x)φ u u 2 f(x, t dx = uu)u 4 R (t uu) dx and this identity is also true if t u is replaced by t u. Therefore, ( (t u) 2 ) (t u ) 2 u 2 = ( f(x, t uu) R (t uu) f(x, t uu) (t u u) )u4 dx, which is absurd in view of (A4) and t u > t u > 0. Remark 2.9. As in [6, 46], we have where c = inf I(u) = inf u N max u F t>0 I(tu) = inf γ(t) Γ max t [0,] I(γ(t)) > 0 Γ := {γ C([0, ], E) : γ(0) = 0, I(γ()) < 0}. Lemma 2.0. Suppose that (A), (A2) (A5) hold. Then there exists a nonnegative and bounded sequence {u n } E such that I(u n ) c and I (u n ) E 0.

EJDE-207/2 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS 9 Proof. From the proof of Lemma 2.8, it is easy to see that I satisfies the mountain pass geometry. By [8], there exists an {u n } such that I(u n ) c and ( + u n ) I (u n ) E 0. By Lemma (2.), we have c = I(u) 4 I (u n ), u n + o n () = 4 u n 2 + ( R 4 f(x, u n)u n F (x, u n ))dx + o n () 4 u n 2 + o n (). Therefore, {u n } is bounded. Moreover, we have I (u n ), u n = u n 2 + K(x)φ un (u n ) 2 dx = o n (). R Then u n 2 = o() and K(x)φ R u n (u n ) 2 = o(). Therefore, we can infer that I(u + n ) c and I (u + n ) E 0. Hence, we may always assume that {u n } is nonnegative and the prove is fished. Lemma 2.. Suppose that (A) (A5) hold. If u N and I(u) = c, then u is a solution of system (.5). Proof. The proof is similar to that of [29, 0]. Suppose by contradiction, that u is not a solution of system (.5). Hence, there exists ϕ E such that I (u), ϕ <. Choose ε (0, ) small enough such that for all t ε and σ ε, I (tu + σϕ), ϕ 2. Let ζ(t) [0, ] satisfies ζ(t) = for t ε 2 and ζ(t) = 0 for t ε. for all t > 0, let γ(t) be a curve such that γ(t) = tu for t ε and γ(t) = tu + εζ(t)ϕ for t < ε. Obviously, γ(t) is a continuous curve, furthermore, γ(t) > 0 for t < ε in which ε small enough. Next we will prove I(γ(t)) < c, for all t > 0. In fact, if t ε, I(γ(t)) = I(tu) < I(u) = c. If t < ε, for all σ [0, ε], we define A : σ I(tu + σζ(t)ϕ). Obviously, A C. By the mean value therm, there exists σ (0, ε) such that I(tu + εζ(t)ϕ) = I(tu) + I (tu + σζ(t)ϕ), εζ(t)ϕ I(tu) ε ζ(t) < c. 2 Set ν(u) := I (u), u, then ν(γ( ε)) = ν(( ε)u) > 0 and ν(γ( + ε)) = ν(( + ε)u) < 0. According to the continuity of t ν(γ(t)), there exists t ( ε, + ε) such that ν(γ(t )) = 0. Thus γ(t ) N and I(γ(t )) < c, which is a contradiction. Define N p = {u F \ {0} : I p(u), u = 0} and c p = inf u N p. In fact, c p = inf u F max t>0 I p (tu). Remark 2.2. For any u F, by Lemma 2.8, there exists t u > 0 such that t u u N and then I(t u u) c. Using V (x) V p (x) and F (x, s) F p (x, s), we have c I(t u u) I p (t u u) max t>0 I p (tu). Then we obtain c c p.

0 D.-B. WANG, H.-F. XIE, W. GUAN EJDE-207/??. Proof of main results Proof. According to Lemma 2.0, there exist a nonnegative and bounded sequence {u n } E such that I(u n ) c and I (u n ) E 0. Then there exists u E such that, up to a subsequence, u n u in E, u n u in L 2 loc (R ) and u n (x) u(x) a.e. in R. By lemma 2.4, we have that 0 = I (u n ), v + o n () = I (u), v, v E, that is u is a solution of system (.5). We next distinguish the following two case to prove system (.5) have a nonnegative ground state solution. Case : u 0. Then I(u) c. By Lemma 2. and the Fatou lemma, we obtain c = lim inf (I(u n) n 4 I (u n ), u n ) ( = lim inf n 4 u n 2 + ( ) R 4 f(x, u n)u n F (x, u n ))dx 4 u 2 + ( f(x, u)u F (x, u))dx R 4 = I(u) 4 I (u), u = I(u). Therefore, I(u) = c and I (u) = 0. Case 2: u = 0. Let β := lim sup n sup z R B (z) u 2 ndx. If β = 0, by using the Lions lemma [27, 28], we have u n 0 in L q (R ) for all q (2, 6). From the conditions of (A2) and (A), for all ε > 0 there exists C ε > 0 such that 2 f(x, u)u F (x, u) ε( u 2 + u 6 ) + C ε u α for any (x, s) R R and α (2, 6). Let ε small enough, we have that c = I(u n ) 2 I (u n ), u n + o n () = K(x)φ un u 2 4 ndx + ( R R 2 f(x, u n)u n F (x, u n ))dx + o n () K(x)φ un u 2 4 ndx + (ε( u n 2 + u n 6 ) + C ε u n α )dx + o n () 0, R R which is a contradiction with c > 0. So β > 0. Up to a subsequence, there exists R > 0 and {z n } Z such that u n (x + z n ) 2 dx = u 2 ndx > β B R B R (z n) 2. Set w n := u n (x + z n ). Hence, there exists a nonnegative function w E such that, up to a subsequence, w n w in E, w n w in L 2 loc (R ) and w n (x) w(x) a.e. in R. Obviously, w 0. If {z n } is bounded, R such that u 2 ndx u 2 ndx β 2, B R (0) B R (z n) which contradicts with the fact u n 0 in L 2 loc (R ). Hence {z n } is unbounded. Up to a subsequence, we have z n. For all ϕ C 0 (R ), by Lemmas 2.6 and 2.7, we have 0 = I (u n, ϕ( z n )) + o n ()

EJDE-207/2 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS = ( u n ϕ( z n )dx + V (x)u n ϕ( z n ))dx + K(x)φ un u n ϕ( z n )dx R R f(x, u n )ϕ( z n )dx + o n () R = ( u n ϕ( z n ) + V p (x)u n ϕ( z n ))dx + K p (x) φ un u n ϕ( z n )dx R R f p (x, u n )ϕ( z n )dx + o n () R = ( w n ϕ + V p (x)w n ϕ)dx + K p (x) φ wn w n ϕdx R R f p (x, w n )ϕdx + o n () R = I p(w), ϕ, that is, w is a solution of periodic system (.7). By Lemma (2.), Lemma 2.5, (A5) and Fatou lemma, we have c = I(u n ) 4 I (u n ), u n + o n () = 4 u n 2 + ( R 4 f(x, u n)u n F (x, u n ))dx + o n () 4 u n 2 + ( R 4 f p(x, u n )u n F p (x, u n ))dx + o n () = 4 w n 2 + ( R 4 f p(x, w n )w n F p (x, w n ))dx + o n () 4 w 2 + ( R 4 f p(x, w)w F p (x, w))dx + o n () = I p (w) 4 I p(w), w = I p (w) c p. Using Remark (2.2), I p (w) = c p = c. By the properties of c and N, there exits t w > 0 such that t w w N. Thus, we obtain c I(t w w) I p (t w w) I p (w) = c. So c is achieved by t w w. By Lemma 2., we have I (t w w) = 0. Therefore, u = t w w is a nonnegative ground state solution for system (.5). Similar to that of discussed in [48], by the maximum principle discussed, u > 0. Acknowledgements. The author thanks the anonymous referees and the editors for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (5604). References [] C. O. Alves, M. A. S. Souto, S. H. M. Soares; Schrödinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 77 (20), 584-592. [2] A. Ambrosetti, M. Badiale, S. Cingolani; Semiclassical states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 40 (997), 285-00. [] A. Ambrosetti, D. Ruiz; Multiple bound states for the Schrödinger-Poisson equation, Commun. Contemp. Math., 0 (2008), -4. [4] A. Azzollini; Concentration and compactness in nonlinear Schrödinger-Poisson systemwith a general nonlinearity, J. Differential Equations, 249 (200), 746-765.

2 D.-B. WANG, H.-F. XIE, W. GUAN EJDE-207/?? [5] A. Azzollini, A. Pomponio; Ground state solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger-Maxwell equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 45 (2008), 90-08. [6] V. Benci, D. Fortunato; An eigenvalue problem for the Schrödinger-Maxwell equations, Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis, (998), 28-29. [7] H. Berestycki, P. L. Lions; Nonlinear scalar field equations. II. Existence of infinitely many solutions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis, 82 (98), 47-75. [8] G. M. Coclite; A multiplicity result for the nonlinear Schrödinger-Maxwell equations, Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, 7 (200), 47-42. [9] G. Cerami, G. Vaira; Positive solutions for some non-autonomous Schrödinger-Poisson systems, J. Differential Equations, 248 (200), 52-54. [0] T. D Aprile, D. Mugnai; Solitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-Maxwell and Schrödinger- Maxwell equations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section: A Mathematics, 4 (2004), 89-906. [] T. D Aprile, D. Mugnai; Non-existence results for the coupled Klein-Gordon-Maxwell equations, Advanced Nonlinear Studies, 4 (2004), 07-22. [2] T. D Aprile, J. Wei; On bound states concentrating on spheres for the Maxwell- Schrödinger equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 7 (2005), 2-42. [] M. del Pino, P. Felmer; Semi-classical states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations: A variational reduction method, Math. Ann., 24 (2002), -2. [4] Y. Ding, F. Lin; Solutions of perturbed Schrödinger equations with critical nonlinearity, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 0 (2007), 2-249. [5] L. R. Huang, E. M. Rocha, J. Q. Chen; Two positive solutions of a class of Schrödinger- Poisson system with indefinite nonlinearity, J. Differential Equations, 255 (20), 246-248. [6] X. He, W. Zou; Existence and concentration of ground states for Schrödinger-Poisson equations with critical growth, J. Math. Phys., 5 (202), 02702. [7] W. Huang, X. H. Tang; Ground-state solutions for asymptotically cubic Schrödinger-Maxwell equations, Mediterr. J. Math., (206), 469 48. [8] L. Jeanjean, K. Tanaka; Singularly perturbed elliptic problems with superlinear or asympotically linear nonlinearities, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 2 (2004), 287-8. [9] Y. Jiang, H. Zhou; Schrödinger-Poisson system with steep potential well, J. Differential Equations, 25 (20), 582-608. [20] G. Li, S. Peng, C. Wang; Multi-bump solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger-Poisson system, J. Math. Phys., 52 (20), 05505. [2] G. Li, S. Peng, S. Yan; Infinitely many positive solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger-Poisson system, Commun. Contemp. Math., 2 (200), 069-092. [22] G. Li, A. Szulkin; An asymptotically periodic Schrödinger equation with indefinite linear part, Commun. Contemp. Math., 4(2002), 76-776. [2] X. Y. Lin, X. H. Tang; An asymptotically periodic and asymptotically linear Schrödinger equation with indefinite linear part, Comp. Math. Appl., 70 (205), 726-76. [24] Y. Li, Z. Q. Wang, J. Zeng; Ground states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with potentials, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. NonLinéaire, 2 (2006), 829-87. [25] Haendel F. Lins, Elves A. B. Silva; Quasilinear asymptotically periodic elliptic equations with critical growth, Nonlinear Analysis, 7 (2009), 2890-2905. [26] Haendel F. Lins, Elves A. B. Silva; Quasilinear asymptotically periodic Schrödinger equations with subcritical growth, Nonlinear Analysis, 72 (200), 295-2949. [27] P. L. Lions; The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré. NonLinéaire, -4 (984), 09-45. [28] P. L. Lions; The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations, The locally compact case, part 2, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. NonLinéaire, -4 (984), 22-28. [29] J. Liu, J. Liao, C. L. Tang; A positive ground state solution for a class of asymptotically periodic Schrödinger equations, Comp. Math. Appl., 7 (206), 965-976. [0] J. Q. Liu, Y. Q. Wang, Z. Q. Wang; Solutions for Quasilinear Schrödinger Equations via the Nehari Method, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 29 (2004), 879-90. [] S. Liu; On superlinear problems without the Ambrosetti Rabinowitz condition, Nonlinear Analysis, 7 (200), 788-795. [2] Z. Liu, Z. Q. Wang, J. Zhang; Infinitely many sign-changing solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger-Poisson system, Annali di Matematica, 95 (206), 775-794.

EJDE-207/2 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS [] Z. Liu, S. Guo, Y. Fang; Multiple semiclassical states for coupled Schrödinger-Poisson equations with critical exponential growth, J. Math. Phys., 56 (205), 04505. [4] R. de Marchi; Schrödinger equations with asymptotically periodic terms, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, (45) 205, 745-757. [5] P. H. Rabinowitz; Minimax theorems in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, In: CBMS. Regional Conf. Ser. in Math. 65, RI, Amer. Math. Soc. (986). [6] P. H. Rabinowitz; On a class of nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 4 (992), 270-29. [7] D. Ruiz; The Schrödinger-Poisson equation under the effect of a nonlinear local term, J. Funct. Anal., 27 (2006), 655-674. [8] M. Schechter; A variation of the mountain pass lemma and applications, J. Lond. Math. Soc., 44 (99), 49-502. [9] E. A. B. Silva, G. F. Vieira; Quasilinear asymptotically periodic Schrödinger equations with critical growth, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 9 (200), -. [40] J. Sun, S. Ma; Ground state solutions for some Schrödinger-Poisson systems with periodic potentials, J. Differential Equations, 260 (206), 29-249. [4] J. Sun, T. F. Wu, Z. Feng; Multiplicity of positive solutions for a nonlinear Schrödinger- Poisson system, J. Differential Equations, 260 (206), 586-627 [42] X. H. Tang; Non-Nehari manifold method for asymptotically linear Schrödinger equation, J. Aust. Math. Soc., 98 (205), 04-6. [4] X. H. Tang; Non-Nehari manifold method for asymptotically periodic Schrödinger equations, Science China Mathematics, 58(205), 75-728. [44] G. Vaira, Gound states for Schrödinger-Poisson type systems, Ricerche di Matematica, (60)20, 26-297. [45] J. Wang, J. Xu, F. Zhang, X. Chen; Existence of multi-bump solutions for a semilinear Schrödinger-Poisson system, Nonlinearity, 26(20), 77-99. [46] M. Willem; Minimax Theorems, Birkhäuser, Bosten, 996. [47] M. Yang, F. Zhao, Y. Ding; On the existence of solutions for Schrödinger-Maxwell systems in R, Rocky Mountain J. Math., 42(202), 655-674. [48] H. Zhang, J. Xu, F. Zhang; Positive ground states for asymptotically periodic Schrödinger- Poisson systems, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 6(20), 427-49. [49] L. Zhao, F. Zhao; On the existence of solutions for the Schrödinger-Poisson equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 46(2008), 55-69. Da-Bin Wang (corresponding author) Department of Applied Mathematics, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 70050, China E-mail address: wangdb96@6.com Hua-Fei Xie Department of Applied Mathematics, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 70050, China E-mail address: xiehuafeilz@6.com Wen Guan Department of Applied Mathematics, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 70050, China E-mail address: mathguanw@6.com