Torsion Experiment. Encoder #3 ( 3 ) Third encoder/disk for Model 205a only. Figure 1: ECP Torsion Experiment

Similar documents
Inverted Pendulum System

Rectilinear System. Introduction. Hardware

Belt Tension Clamp. Drive Motor. Friction Brake. Load. Encoder 2. Drive. (4000 lines/rev incremental) Encoder 1. (4000 lines/rev incremental)

Industrial Servo System

Industrial Servo System

Lecture #8-3 Oscillations, Simple Harmonic Motion

Physics 2107 Oscillations using Springs Experiment 2

Q5 We know that a mass at the end of a spring when displaced will perform simple m harmonic oscillations with a period given by T = 2!

Actuators & Mechanisms Actuator sizing

16.30/31 September 24, 2010 Prof. J. P. How and Prof. E. Frazzoli Due: October 15, 2010 T.A. B. Luders /31 Lab #1

9 HOOKE S LAW AND SIMPLE HARMONIC MOTION

Department of Physics Preliminary Exam January 3 6, 2006

Chapter 2: Introduction to Damping in Free and Forced Vibrations

Faraday's Law Warm Up

m A 1 m mgd k m v ( C) AP Physics Multiple Choice Practice Oscillations

BALLISTIC PENDULUM. EXPERIMENT: Measuring the Projectile Speed Consider a steel ball of mass

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.010: Systems Modeling and Dynamics III. Final Examination Review Problems

DETECTION OF NONLINEARITY IN VIBRATIONAL SYSTEMS USING THE SECOND TIME DERIVATIVE OF ABSOLUTE ACCELERATION

Spinning Disk and Chladni Plates

Simple and Compound Harmonic Motion

LAB MECH8.COMP From Physics with Computers, Vernier Software & Technology, 2003.

ma x = -bv x + F rod.

T m. Fapplied. Thur Oct 29. ω = 2πf f = (ω/2π) T = 1/f. k m. ω =

Part IA Paper 1: Mechanical Engineering MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS Examples paper 3

COS 424: Interacting with Data. Written Exercises

Successful Brushless A.C. Power Extraction From The Faraday Acyclic Generator

Analysis of ground vibration transmission in high precision equipment by Frequency Based Substructuring

In the session you will be divided into groups and perform four separate experiments:

Question 1. [14 Marks]

EE 468 Control System Laboratory Supporting Materials and Experiments

Simple Harmonic Motion

Problem Set 14: Oscillations AP Physics C Supplementary Problems

The ballistic pendulum

CHAPTER 19: Single-Loop IMC Control

ME Machine Design I. FINAL EXAM. OPEN BOOK AND CLOSED NOTES. Friday, May 8th, 2009

A Pulley System Apparatus for a Laboratory Experience in Dynamics

Energy and Momentum: The Ballistic Pendulum

Ocean 420 Physical Processes in the Ocean Project 1: Hydrostatic Balance, Advection and Diffusion Answers

Experiment 2: Hooke s Law

Simple Harmonic Motion

Analysis of Impulsive Natural Phenomena through Finite Difference Methods A MATLAB Computational Project-Based Learning

TUTORIAL 1 SIMPLE HARMONIC MOTION. Instructor: Kazumi Tolich

PH 221-1D Spring Oscillations. Lectures Chapter 15 (Halliday/Resnick/Walker, Fundamentals of Physics 9 th edition)

The ballistic pendulum

Ph 20.3 Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations

Self-Erecting Inverted Pendulum: Swing up and Stabilization Control

= T. Oscillations and Waves. Example of an Oscillating System IB 12 IB 12

Periodic Motion is everywhere

Name: Partner(s): Date: Angular Momentum

Laboratory 11 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557. State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint

1 (40) Gravitational Systems Two heavy spherical (radius 0.05R) objects are located at fixed positions along

Waves Unit I Activity: Kinematic Equations for SHM

Honors Lab 4.5 Freefall, Apparent Weight, and Friction

Using a De-Convolution Window for Operating Modal Analysis

Accuracy of the Scaling Law for Experimental Natural Frequencies of Rectangular Thin Plates

Ufuk Demirci* and Feza Kerestecioglu**

EN40: Dynamics and Vibrations. Final Examination Tuesday May 15, 2011

THE EFFECT OF SOLID PARTICLE SIZE UPON TIME AND SEDIMENTATION RATE

DIRECT TORQUE CONTROL OF INDUCTION MACHINES CONSIDERING THE IRON LOSSES

H Technical Reference

PHYS 102 Previous Exam Problems

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF THE TYRE/ROAD CONTACT

which proves the motion is simple harmonic. Now A = a 2 + b 2 = =

EXPERIMENT 2 Acceleration of Gravity

Two-Mass, Three-Spring Dynamic System Investigation Case Study

Physics 207 Lecture 18. Physics 207, Lecture 18, Nov. 3 Goals: Chapter 14

Physics 218 Exam 3 Fall 2010, Sections

Supplementary Information for Design of Bending Multi-Layer Electroactive Polymer Actuators

CHECKLIST. r r. Newton s Second Law. natural frequency ω o (rad.s -1 ) (Eq ) a03/p1/waves/waves doc 9:19 AM 29/03/05 1

HYBRID ADAPTIVE FRICTION COMPENSATION OF INDIRECT DRIVE TRAINS

5/09/06 PHYSICS 213 Exam #1 NAME FEYNMAN Please write down your name also on the back side of the last page

Flipping Physics Lecture Notes: Free Response Question #1 - AP Physics Exam Solutions

Force and dynamics with a spring, analytic approach

Modular Control of a Rotary Inverted Pendulum System

System Design of Quadrotor

Determining a Function for the Damping Coefficient of a laminated Stack

Chapter 1: Basics of Vibrations for Simple Mechanical Systems

ANALYSIS OF HALL-EFFECT THRUSTERS AND ION ENGINES FOR EARTH-TO-MOON TRANSFER

(b) Frequency is simply the reciprocal of the period: f = 1/T = 2.0 Hz.

Definition of Work, The basics

PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION OF A FEED DRIVE FOR HIGH SPEED MACHINE TOOLS

N-Point. DFTs of Two Length-N Real Sequences

9. h = R. 10. h = 3 R

dt dt THE AIR TRACK (II)

2.9 Feedback and Feedforward Control

XI PHYSICS M. AFFAN KHAN LECTURER PHYSICS, AKHSS, K.

Axis. Axis. Axis. Solid cylinder (or disk) about. Hoop about. Annular cylinder (or ring) about central axis. central axis.

OBJECTIVES INTRODUCTION

Student Book pages

Robustness Experiments for a Planar Hopping Control System

Physics 41 HW Set 1 Chapter 15 Serway 7 th Edition

Instruction Sheet Martin Henschke, Ballistic Pendulum art. no.:

Monitoring and system identification of suspension bridges: An alternative approach

Name Period. What force did your partner s exert on yours? Write your answer in the blank below:

Physics 4A Solutions to Chapter 15 Homework

Reducing Vibration and Providing Robustness with Multi-Input Shapers

Vibration Characteristics of Cardboard Inserts in Shells

A body of unknown mass is attached to an ideal spring with force constant 123 N/m. It is found to vibrate with a frequency of

State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Link

Unit 14 Harmonic Motion. Your Comments

Transcription:

Torsion Experient Introduction For the Torsion lab, there are two required experients to perfor and one extra credit assignent at the end. In experient 1, the syste paraeters need to be identified so that they can be used in later experients to build a controller. Experient 2 is broken into 4 sub-parts. First, the disks are anually displaced with a P or a PD controller. After this, a step input is ipleented to 3 different systes; under-daped, critically daped and over-daped. Next, a full PID controller is ipleented and tested, and coparisons are drawn between the PD and PID controllers. The final test in Experient 2 then evaluates the frequency response of the under-daped, critically daped and overdaped systes tested earlier. (J 3) Encoder #3 ( 3 ) Third encoder/disk for Model 205a only k2 = L2 GJ Make certain upper disk is ounted below shaft clap (J 2 ) k1 = L1 GJ Encoder #2 ( ) 2 (J 1) 4 Movable asses each disk Brushless Servo Motor Encoder #1 ( 1) Rigid belt drive Hardware Figure 1: ECP Torsion Experient The syste we use in this experient is Model 205. Figure 1 shows the Model 205 Torsion Experient consisting of three disks supported by a torsionally flexible shaft that is suspended vertically on anti-friction ball bearings. The shaft is driven by a brushless servo otor connected via a rigid belt (negligible tensile flexibility) and pulley syste 1

with a 3:1 speed reduction ratio. An encoder located on the base of the shaft easures the angular displaceent, 1 of the first disk, J 1. Two additional encoders easure the displaceents of the other two disks as shown. The torsional echanis represents any physical plants including rigid bodies; flexibility in drive shafts, gearing and belts; and coupled discrete vibration with actuator at the drive input and sensor collocated or at flexibly coupled output (non-collocated). Safety As with every lab, first read Appendix B on the course website. For this lab experient - Ensure the asses are firly secured by screws. - Be sure to stay clear of the echanis when turning on the controller. Selecting Ipleent Algorith iediately ipleents the specified controller; if there is an instability or large control signal, the plant ay react violently. If the syste appears stable after ipleenting the controller, first displace the disk with a light, non sharp object (e.g. a plastic ruler) to verify stability prior to touching plant. Hardware/Software Equipent Check Before starting the lab, ake sure the equipent is working by following the steps below: Step 1: Enter the ECP progra by double clicking on its icon. You should see the Background Screen. Gently rotate the drive or load disk by hand. You should observe soe following errors and changes in encoder counts. The Control Loop Status should indicate "OPEN" and the Controller Status should indicate OK. Step 2: Make sure that you can rotate the disks freely. Now press the black "ON" button to turn on the power to the Control Box. You should notice the green power indicator LED lit, but the otor should reain in a disabled state. Do not touch the disks whenever power is applied to the Control Box since there is a potential for uncontrolled otion of the disks unless the controller has been safety checked. 2

Experient 1: Syste Identification In practice, the syste paraeters of a piece of equipent, such as the inertia, spring constant, and daping ratios are often unknown. In this section of the lab, these unknown paraeters will be deterined using a process called syste identification. These sae paraeters will be used later to ipleent various controllers. Procedure: 1. Secure four 500g asses on the upper and lower disks as shown in the figure. Verify that the asses are secured and that each is at a center distance of 9.0 c fro the shaft center-line. 2. Clap the center disk to put the echanis in the configuration shown in Figure 1-1a using the 1/4" bolt, square nut, and clap spacer. Only light torqueing on the bolt is necessary. 3. Set the tie saple interval and tie duration for sapling using the following procedure: With the controller powered up, enter the Control Algorith box via the Set-up enu and set T s = 0.00442 and Continuous Tie. Enter the Coand enu, go to Trajectory and select Step, Set-up. Select Open Loop Step and input a step size of 0 (zero), a duration of 4000 s and 1 repetition. Exit to the Background Screen by consecutively selecting OK. This puts the controller board in a ode for acquiring 8 sec of data on coand but without driving the actuator. This procedure ay be repeated and the duration adjusted to vary the data acquisition period. Encoder #3 Encoder #3 2 9.0 c fro C/L of shaft to C/L of each ass 9.0 c fro C/L of shaft to C/L of each ass J 2 Middle disk claped k1 4 asses on top and botto disks 2 asses on top and botto disks J 1 Encoder #1 1 Encoder #1 a) Set-up To Begin Plant Identification Procedure b) Transfer Function Configuration 3

Figure 1 Configurations For Plant Identification 4. Select the encoder(s) needed for this lab and how often to easure the using the following steps: Go to Set up Data Acquisition in the Data enu and select Encoder #1 and Encoder #3 as data to acquire and specify data sapling every 2 (two) servo cycles, i.e. every 2 T s 's. Select OK to exit. Select Zero Position fro the Utility enu to zero the encoder positions. 5. Collect data for the experient using the following steps: Prepare to anually displace the upper disk approxiately 20 deg. Exercise caution in displacing the inertia disk; displaceents beyond 40 deg ay daage and possibly break the flexible drive shaft. (Displaceents beyond 25 deg will trip a software liit which disables the controller indicated by "Liit Exceeded" in the Controller Status box in the Background Screen. To reset, siply reselect Execute fro the Coand enu.) Select Execute fro the Coand enu. With the upper disk displaced approxiately 20 deg ( 1000 encoder counts as read on the Background Screen display) in either direction, select Run fro the Execute box and release the disk approxiately 1 second later. The disk will oscillate and slowly attenuate while encoder data is collected to record this response. Select OK after data is uploaded. 6. Export the data fro ECP to MATLAB, and plot the Encoder 3 data using MATLAB. Be sure to clearly label the plots. 7. Find the natural frequency of the syste using the following steps: Choose several consecutive cycles (say 5 to 10) in the aplitude range between 100 and 1000 counts. Divide the nuber of cycles by the tie taken to coplete the being sure to take beginning and end ties fro the sae phase of the respective haronic cycles. Convert the resulting frequency in Hz to radians/sec. This daped frequency, d, approxiates the natural frequency, n, according to: (Equation 1-1) where the "d31" subscript denotes disk #3, trial #1. To find the exact tie, use the Data Cursor tool in the MATLAB figure window fro the plot you just created in step 6. Use these values to find the frequency. When pasting in the plot to your lab report, ake sure to include the beginning and ending points you used for your calculations. 4

8. Now prepare for the next test, and repeat the above process. To do this, reove the four asses fro the third (upper) disk and repeat Steps 5 through 7 to obtain nd32 for the unloaded disk. If necessary, repeat Step 3 to reduce the execution (data sapling) duration. Make sure to export the data fro ECP to MATLAB and create a new figure for this data, and clearly label the plot and the beginning and end points as you did in the step before. 9. Find the daping ratio of the syste using the following steps: Measure the reduction fro the initial cycle aplitude X o to the last cycle aplitude X n for the n cycles easured in Step #8. Using relationships associated with the logarithic decreent: (Equation 1-2) find the daping ratio d32 and show that for this sall value the approxiations of Equations 1 and 2 are valid. By using the Data Cursor fro the last step, you also have the beginning and ending aplitudes. 10. Find the natural frequency and daping ratio for Disk 1. To do this, repeat Steps 5 through 9 for the lower disk, disk #1. Make sure you acquire data for Encoder 1 instead of Encoder 3. Obtain nd11, nd12 and d12. How does this daping ratio copare with that for the upper disk? 11. Calculate by hand the inertia of the disks 1 and 3 together. Use the following inforation pertaining to each ass piece to calculate the portion of each disk's inertia attributable to the four asses for the "d31" and "d11" cases. Brass Mass (incl. bolt & nut) = 500g (± 5g) Diaeter of Brass Mass = 5.00 c (± 0.02 c) 12. Calling this luped inertia J (i.e. that associated with the four asses cobined), use the following relationships to solve for the unloaded disk inertia J d3, and upper torsional shaft spring k d3. k d3 /(J +J d3 ) = ( nd31 ) 2 (Equation 1-3) k d3 /J d3 = ( nd32 ) 2 (Equation 1-4) 5

13. Find the daping coefficient c d3 by equating the first order ters in the equation for: s 2 + 2 n s + 2 n = s 2 + c/js + k/j (Equation 1-5) Repeat this for the lower unloaded disk inertia (this includes the reflected inertias of the otor, belt, and pulleys), spring and daping J d1, c d1 and k d1 respectively. 1 Now all dynaic paraeters have been identified! Values for J 1 and J 2 for any configuration of asses ay be found by adding the calculated inertia contribution of the asses to that of the unloaded disk 2. The final report is expected to include: A diagra identifying the control eleents and signals in the Torsion Experient. Sensor: Actuator: Controller: Reference Input: Actuator Output: Syste Output: Four (4) MATLAB Plots, with two (2) Data Cursor Points on each plot, along with titles, labels and legends if necessary that clearly show which plot corresponds to which situation. - Disk 3 Trial 1 - Disk 3 Trial 2 - Disk 1 Trial 1 - Disk 1 Trial 2 Calculations showing how you found the following values, along with units for EVERY quantity found. Use equations 1-1 1-5. - 4 Natural frequencies ( nd31 nd32 nd11 nd12 ) - 2 Daping ratios ( d32 d12 ) - *Inertia of the 4 asses (J ) - Inertia of Disk 1 (J d1 ) - Inertia of Disk 3 (J d3 ) - Daping constant on Disk 3 (c d3 ) - Daping constant on Disk 1 (c d1 ) - Spring constant on Disk 3 (k d3 ) - Spring constant on Disk 1 (k d1 ) 1 Steps 11, 12 and 13 ay be done later, away fro the laboratory, if necessary. 2 In plant configurations where a disk is used in the center location, the inertia and daping paraeters ay be assued to be the sae as for the upper disk. 6

* First, calculate the inertia of each weight about its center of gravity (Jcg=0.5*r 2 ). Then, use the parallel axis theore to get the inertia about the center of rotation (J=J cg +R 2 ). Then ultiply four to get J. For all the questions highlighted, the questions should be copied and pasted into your lab report and explicitly answered iediately thereafter. Experient 2.a: Rigid Body PD and PID Control In this part of the lab, a proportional controller will be ipleented, so that the syste will act like a specific frequency spring. After this the proportional gain will be increased. After these tests a daping ter will also be included. Note: You will need this value: k hw = 17.4 N-/rad Procedure: Proportional & Derivative Control Actions 1. Using the results fro Experient 1 to construct a odel of the plant with two ass pieces at 9.0 c radial center distance on the botto disk both other disks reoved. You ay neglect friction. 2. Set-up the plant in the configuration described in Step 1. 3. Fro Equation 2-3 deterine the value of k p (k d =0) so that the syste behaves like a 1 Hz spring-inertia oscillator. n = k pk hw J (Equation 2-3) 4. Set the tie saple interval and tie duration for sapling using the following procedure: Set-up to collect Encoder #1 and Coanded Position inforation via the Set-up Data Acquisition box in the Data enu. Set up a closed-loop step of 0 (zero) counts, dwell tie = 5000 s, and 1 (one) rep (Trajectory in the Coand enu). 5. Now, set up the controller. Enter the Control Algorith box under Set-up and set Ts=0.00442 s and select Continuous Tie Control. Select PI + Velocity Feedback (this is the return path derivative for) and Set-up Algorith. Enter the k p value deterined above for 1 Hz oscillation (k d & k i = 0, do not input values greater than k p = 0.16) and select OK. Select Ipleent Algorith, then OK. 6. Run the experient: Prepare to anually rotate the lower disk roughly 60 deg. Select Execute under Coand. Then select Run, rotate about 60 deg. and release disk. Do not hold the rotated disk position for 7

longer than 1-2 seconds as this ay cause the otor drive theral protection to open the control loop. 7.a Export the data to MATLAB. Plot the encoder 1 data Calculate the frequency by using the Data Cursor Tool in the MATLAB Figure. Be sure to show the calculations and units. For syste stability, do not input values greater than k p = 0.16). 7.b Repeat the test with a new proportional gain. Double the value of k p. Repeat steps 5, 6 and 7.a with the new value of k p. Again, Export the data to MATLAB. Plot the encoder 1 data 8. Deterine the value of the derivative gain, k d, to achieve k d k hw = 0.1N/(rad/s). 3. Repeat Step 5, except input the above value for k d and set k p & k i = 0. (Do not input values greater than k d = 0.1). 9. After checking the syste for stability by displacing it with a ruler, anually ove the disk back and forth to feel the effect of viscous daping provided by k d. Do not excessively coerce the disk as this will again cause the otor drive theral protection to open the control loop. 10. Repeat Steps 8 & 9 for a value of k d five ties as large (Again, k d 0.1). Can you feel the increased daping? The final report is expected to include: Two (2) MATLAB Plots, with two (2) Data Cursor Points on each plot, along with titles, labels and legends if necessary that clearly show which plot corresponds to which situation. - Plot of k p - Plot of 2k p Calculations showing how you found the following values, along with units for EVERY quantity found. - Inertia of the Syste J for this experiental setup - Calculation for k p - Experiental frequency calculations using the k p value calculated. - Calculations for k d 3 For the discrete ipleentation you ust divide the resulting value by T s for the controller input value Here, since the PD controller is iproper, the backwards difference transforation: s = (1-z-1)/T s is used. 8

Experient 2.b PD Control Design & Step Response This part is a continuation of Experient 2.a with the sae experiental setup. In this section the k p and k d values will be used to calculate 3 separate scenarios; under daped, over daped and critically daped. 11. Perfor the calculations used to find the gain values for the following tests. Fro Equations 2-2 through 2-4) design controllers (i.e. find k p & k d ) for a syste natural frequency n = 2 Hz, and three daping cases: 1) = 0.2 (under-daped), 2) = 1.0 (critically daped), 3) = 2.0 (over-daped). c(s) = k p k hw /J (Equation 2-2) s 2 + k hw /J k d s+k p n = k pk hw J (Equation 2-3) = k d k hw k = d k hw 2J n 2 Jk p k hw (Equation 2-4) 12. Set up the controller and the input. Ipleent the underdaped controller (via PI + Velocity Feedback) and set up a trajectory for a 2500 count closed-loop Step with 2000 s dwell tie and 1 rep. 13. Run the test. Execute this trajectory and plot the coanded position and encoder position in MATLAB (Plot the both on the sae vertical axis so that there is no graphical bias.) 14. Repeat Steps 12 & 13 for the critically daped and over-daped cases. Save your plots for later coparison. The final report is expected to include: Four (4) MATLAB Plots, along with titles, labels and legends if necessary that clearly show which plot corresponds to which situation. - Under-daped step response - Critically daped step response - Over-daped step response - All three cases plotted on one graph with the coanded position (Hint: use the Legend coand and different colors and lines to plot each response clearly) Calculations showing how you found the following values, along with units for EVERY quantity found. - K p 9

- Under-daped k d - Critically daped k d - Over-daped k d *If the calculated k p does not give you the right n, experientally deterine a k p which does. Experient 2.c Adding Integral Action In this part of the lab, a full PID controller will be ipleented. By adding integral action to the controller, the settling tie and overshoot will be ipacted. 18a. Perfor the calculations and progra the controller. Now copute k i such that k i k hw = 3 N-/(rad-sec). Ipleent a controller with this value of k i and the critically daped k p & k d paraeters fro Step 11. (Do not input k i >0.4. 18b. Execute a 2500 count closed-loop step of 5000 s duration (1 rep). 18c. Plot the encoder #1 response and coanded position in MATLAB 19. Experientally deterine a value of k i that visibly gives you a better response judged by its transient response and steady-state error in coparison to the previous run. This k i ay be saller than the one used in Step 18. The final report is expected to include: Three (3) MATLAB Plots, along with titles, labels and legends if necessary that clearly show which plot corresponds to which situation. - Calculated k i - Experientally better k i - A plot containing values of k i = 0 (fro Experient 2.b), the calculated k i and the better k i, along with the coanded position (Hint: use the Legend coand and different colors and lines to plot each response clearly) Calculations showing how you found the following values, along with units for EVERY quantity found. - k i Observe these results and briefly describe the effects of adding integral action to the controller. Is this what you expect? Experient 2.d Frequency Response In this portion of the lab, the input will now be a series of increasing frequency sine waves, used to deterine the frequency perforance of the controller. 15a. Ipleent the under daped controller fro Step 11. 10

15b. Set up a trajectory for a 400 count closed-loop Sine Sweep fro 0.1 Hz to 20 Hz of 60 seconds duration with Logarithic Sweep checked. (You ay wish to specify Encoder #1 data only via Set-up Data Acquisition. This will reduce the acquired data size.) 16a. Execute the trajectory 16b. Plot the Encoder 1 frequency response using Linear Tie and Linear aplitude for the horizontal and vertical axes in MATLAB. The data will reflect the syste otion seen as the sine sweep was perfored. 16c. Now plot the sae data using Logarithic Frequency and Db aplitude. By considering the aplitude (the upper ost portion of the data curve) you will see the data in the forat coonly found in the literature for Bode agnitude plots. Can you easily identify the resonance frequency and the high frequency (>5 Hz) and low frequency (< 0.8 Hz) gain slopes? (i.e. in Db/decade). 17. Repeat Step 16 for the critically daped and over daped cases The final report is expected to include: Six (6) MATLAB Plots, along with titles, labels and legends if necessary that clearly show which plot corresponds to which situation. - Plot of under-daped linear tie and aplitude - Plot of critically daped linear tie and aplitude - Plot of over-daped linear tie and aplitude - Plot of under-daped frequency response (logarithic axes) * ark the resonance peak with the Data Cursor - Plot of critically daped frequency response (logarithic axes) - Plot of over-daped frequency response (logarithic axes) Calculations showing how you found the following values, along with units for EVERY quantity found. - The percent error between the natural frequency fro Experient 2.b and the resonance frequency - Note the gain slopes Extra Credit! The following is optional. It was in old versions of the lab, and students are welcoe to try it to see if this iproves understanding of the syste behavior. If understanding is notably deonstrated in the lab writeup, then a inor level of extra credit, no ore than 10%, will be given. 11

Part (2) Two degree-of-freedo syste (follow instruction below) Mount all three disks to the device. Add a pair of weights to both lower and iddle disks at 9.0 c radius. Unfasten the iddle disk and fasten the top disk to the frae so that it can t ove. The syste now has two degrees of freedo at the two oving disks, and the shaft segents connecting the three disks act as torsional springs. Set up a sine sweep action siilar to what you did in Step 15 except this tie setting the trajectory to sweep frequencies fro 0.5 Hz to 10Hz. You should acquire position data for both disk 1 and disk 2. Execute the sine sweep and observe the responses fro both the disks. They are not in phase but you should see the responses increase, decrease, increase again and decrease again as the sweep frequency increases, suggesting two natural frequencies. Plot Encoder 1 position in Log frequency and Db aplitude, fro which to estiate the captured two natural frequencies (the peaks). Repeat it for Encoder 2 position to see if the captured peaks are the sae frequencies. The final report is expected to include: Two (2) MATLAB Plots, along with titles, labels and legends if necessary that clearly show which plot corresponds to which situation. Use the Data Cursor to indicate the two natural frequency peaks in each plot. - Plot of Encoder 1 - Plot of Encoder 2 Calculations showing how you found the following values, along with units for EVERY quantity found. - The two natural frequencies for Disk 1 - The two natural frequencies for Disk 2 12