Spatial Heterogeneity of Nitrogen in Plant Invasion Project Progress Report

Similar documents
Do Native Plant Mixtures Reduce Invasions Along Roadsides in Wisconsin? Joslyn Mink MS Candidate University of Wisconsin-Madison

Basic and Applied Ecology

OPPORTUNITY PONDS A CELLS (PCMA_008)

Communities on the Loam Ecosite

Communities on the Badlands Ecosites

John B. Taft Connie Carroll-Cunningham Hannah L. Grant. INHS Technical Report 2014 (13) Prepared for Illinois Tollway Authority Issue Date: 03/28/2014

FINAL REPORT ASSESS MANAGEMENT-IGNITED FIRE EFFECTS UPON THE VEGETATION OF BONITO PARK APRIL 21, 2004

PURPOSE... i. Abbreviations... i. 1 Introduction Methods Compliance with Management Plans Results Discussion...

Photosynthetic Capacity of 26 Dominant Plant Species of the Mixedgrass

Comparison of Vegetation Sampling Procedures in a Disturbed Mixed-Grass Prairie

MAPPING WEEDS ON ANCESTRAL LANDS: A COLLABORATIVE PILOT PROGRAM ENGAGING NAVAJO AND HOPI YOUNG ADULTS

Towards characterizing green roof vegetation using color-infrared and thermal sensors

Monitoring Restoration of the Vaseux-Bighorn National Wildlife Area Following Pipeline Construction

Beach and Dune Plant Associations of British Columbia

Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model

THE USE OF MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN THE RESTORATION OF HIGHLY DISTURBED SOILS AT HEIL RANCH, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO U.S.A.

Study 11.9 Invasive Plant Study

Full Sun, Wet Prairies

Invasive Alien Vascular Plants in Bulgaria

Vegetation Ecology Plains to Alpine Fieldtrip: Vascular Plant Species (Working List) Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado

A TEST OF THE EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL GROUP RICHNESS AND COMPOSITION ON GRASSLAND INVASIBILITY

Upland Prairie System

of MINNESOTA DRAFT P ollinator RESOURCE VALUES for Upland & Wetland Prairies

Ecological Archives. Europe. North America

Karr J.R. and D.R. Dudley Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Manager 5:55-68.

POLLINATOR HABITAT EVALUATION FORM

RAIN GARDEN PLANT GUIDE

Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34

Identifying faithful neighbours of rare plants in Britain; an application of the TPP dataset

Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems

The Role of Native Annual Forbs in the Restoration of Invaded Rangelands

Patterns Of Alpine Plant Species Diversity Across Elevational Gradients At Four Sites In California:

Biodiversity Laboratory. Measuring Impacts on Soil Biodiversity in Agroecosystems

I L L IN 0 PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Oikos. Appendix 1 OIK Conradi, T., Temperton, V. M. and Kollmann, J. 2017: Resource availability determines the importance of nichebased

Plant Production as a Measure of Environment: A Study in Crop Ecology

Final Report Year Two

AFNR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths

Plant Community Change Following Fifty-years of Management at Kalsow Prairie Preserve, Iowa, U.S.A.

Presentation of the list of invasive plants in Bosna and Herzegovina. Doc. dr Zlatan Kovačević Doc. dr Siniša Mitrić Mr Biljana Vučković

John B. Taft; Hannah L. Grant; Connie C. Cunningham. INHS Technical Report 2015 (06) Prepared for Illinois Tollway Authority. Issue Date: 03/11/2015

Our understanding of the ecology

A Plant Inventory of Weeden Farm

Across kingdoms and continents: being a grassland ecologist is AWESOME! Kimberly La Pierre University of California, Berkeley

NEIGHBOURHOOD INVASIVE PLANT COST SHARE PROGRAM INFORMATION PACKAGE 2017

Nolan Notah GIS Field Supervisor -Conservation Legacy -Southwest Conservation Corps -Ancestral Lands

Vegetation of the mima mounds of Kalsow Prairie, Iowa

Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) is an invasive

ARTHROPOD AND PLANT RESPONSES TO RESOURCE AVAILABILITY AND HETEROGENEITY. Irene Samantha Khavin. B.S., Rutgers University, 2001

Using Rana to Screen Plant Species for Effective Pollinator Support During Ecosystem Restoration

Water the odds: Precipitation manipulations impact different stages of plant recruitment in a mixed-grass prairie ecosystem

Biodiversity indicators for UK habitats: a process for determining species-weightings. Ed Rowe

Historical Michigan Landscapes

Appendix A.8.21 Lackagh Quarry Petrifying Spring Survey Results

HIGH LINE BLOOM LIST SEPTEMBER

Herbicide Effectiveness on Weeds in Mint

Major Changes in Grassland as a Result of Continued Drought

Vascular Flora of the University of Central Oklahoma Selman Living Living Laboratory, Woodward County, Oklahoma

Differential effects of temperature and precipitation on early- vs. late-flowering species

I""~ ':I~iI1.4~ ",.. ;:., '~r' t, ," -, MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART

Restoring wet prairies at EE Wilson Wildlife Area 2012 report

IMPORTANT PLANT AREA NOMINATION FORM MONTANA

Key To Microscopic Fragments of Plant Tissue in Prairie Dog Stomachs and Food Habits of Prairie Dogs in South Dakota

Diversity and Floristics of Monocots

The Effects of Hemiparasitism by Castilleja Species on Community Structure in Alpine Ecosystems

NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT

U. S. UPLAND ECOLOGICAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR GRASSLANDS

RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY OF ROCK OUTCROP COMMUNITIES

Botany Appendix. Appendix A Lists of Species Recorded Appendix B Field Data Forms Appendix C Vegetation Characterization Report

Seedling resistance to herbivory as a predictor of relative abundance in a synthesised prairie community

Cover photograph credits clockwise from the top: Alaysha Whitworth, Jackie Hafla, and Colby Kramer. All photographs are from Big Southern Butte.

VEGETATION AND NOXIOUS WEEDS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

SILENE SPALDINGII (SPALDING S CATCHFLY) POPULATION VIGOR AND COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS IN ASOTIN COUNTY, SOUTHEASTERN WASHINGTON TARYN BETH CLARK

Changing soils to manage plant

FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY AND MOWING REGIME OF FLOWER STRIPS AS TOOLS TO SUPPORT POLLINATORS AND TO SUPPRESS WEEDS

LIST A OF THE COLORADO NOXIOUS WEEDS - ERADICATION REQUIRED - IN DOUGLAS CO PRIORITY

MINERAL COUNTY WEED DISTRICT

Activated Carbon as a Restoration Tool: Potential for Control of Invasive Plants in Abandoned Agricultural Fields

USING GRIME S MATHEMATICAL MODEL TO DEFINE ADAPTATION STRATEGY OF VASCULAR PLANTS IN THE NORTH OF RUSSIA

Appendix C Treatment Options by Target Species

Largest % of global land cover. Perennial native grasslands. > 50% ice free terrestrial landscape Multi-continental range.

Shadow Cliffs Wildflowers

BIOLOGY TECHNICAL NOTE

Coyote Hills Wildflowers

An analysis of tall-grass prairie vegetation relative to slope position, Sheeder Prairie, Iowa

Effects of Species, Water, and Nitrogen on Competition Among Three Prairie Grasses

ROLE OF NITROGEN AVAILABILITY IN THE TRANSITION FROM ANNUAL DOMINATED TO PERENNIAL DOMINATED SERAL COMMUNITIES

Oikos. Appendix 1. Adult understory Seed bank. Nestedness [NODF] 30. Nurse age [years]

Native Species? In US prior to European settlement

Status of Biological Control Agents Used for Managing Invasive Plants in Colorado

Alien plant species in Eastern Wisconsin Natural Areas

Astragalus mulfordiae: Population dynamics and the effect of cattle grazing in the Vale District, BLM

Ecology for Planting Design - understanding long-term plant performance. (C) Noel Kingsbury 2016

The Effect of Water Stress on the Efficacy of Mesotrione to Control Weeds in Cool-season Turfgrass Stands

Northwest Invasive Plant Council Land Owner Weed Removal Rebate

A revised Flora of the Pacific Northwest: Taxonomic implications Washington s flora

Desert Biomes of North America and Beyond

Varying diversity patterns of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens at different spatial scales in central European landscapes

INTEREST in native plants and prairie restoration has increased

Barcode UK: saving plants and pollinators using DNA barcoding

Transcription:

Spatial Heterogeneity of Nitrogen in Plant Invasion Project Progress Report Submitted by Investigator: Kallin Tea Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bowman University of Colorado, Boulder Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department Progress Report Through Jan. 2009 This project investigated the role of spatial heterogeneity of nutrients and its influence on a plant community s susceptibility to new plant establishment. It consisted of creating a spatially heterogeneous nutrient treatment through minor nutrient amendment and then subsequently seeding the research site with 4 native weedy species to simulate a plant invasion. Research was conducted at two sites: the Tracy Collin s property just north of the wind generation laboratories and the South Boulder Creek West Trail. The project design was identical at both sites. The design of the experiment at each site consisted of four different treatments: homogeneous nutrient amendment, heterogeneous nutrient amendment, no amendment with seeding, and no amendment without seeding. Each treatment consisted of 8 replicate plots, where each plot was a 2 x 2 m square. In May 2008, experimental plots were set-up using a large nail and washer to hammer blue flagging into the ground at each of the four corners of the plot to facilitate locating the site again in the future. The homogeneous amendment plots received a consistent addition of nutrient throughout the plot: 4 g N/m 2 /yr, 2.5 g K/m 2 /yr, 1.25 g P/m 2 /yr. The heterogeneous 1

amendment received the same amount of nutrients as the homogeneous treatment (Table 1). The two controls of no amendment with and without seeding did not receive any nutrients. Table 1. Example of heterogeneous treatment plot with 16 subplots, + is nutrient amended subplot, 0 is no nutrient amended subplot. 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 After the plots were set-up and fertilized, plant surveys were conducted once in the early season June-July 2008 and again in the late season August 2008 (Table 2). These surveys were conducted using a point-intercept method, with 144 points in each plot. In January 2009, seeds of 4 native weeds that were collected from Boulder County during the summer of 2008 and were dispersed evenly amongst all the treatments except for the no amendment without seeding control (Table 3). The four species were: Helianthus annuus, Helianthus petiolaris, Grindelia squarrosa, and Argemone polyanthemos. 2

Table 2: Timetable of Research Project Dates Heterogeneous Nutrient with Seeding May 2008-2010 Deposit nutrient pellets Homogeneous Nutrient with Seeding Deposit nutrient pellets Treatments No Amendment with Seeding No Amendment without Seeding May-June & August 2008-2010 Plant Vegetation Plant Vegetation Plant Vegetation Plant Vegetation January 2009 Seeding 4 Native Species Seeding 4 Native Species Seeding 4 Native Species August 2010, nutrient sampling will occur. Table 3: Seeds Dispersed in Treatments: Homogeneous, Heterogeneous, No Amendment with seeding Helianthus annuus Helianthus petiolaris Grindelia squarrosa Argemone polyanthemos 240 seeds/m 2 46 seeds/m 2 373 seeds/m 2 103 seeds/m 2 According to the 3 year project design, fertilization treatments and plant surveys will take place again in 2009 and 2010, identical to what took place in 2008. Then in late August of 2010, after vegetation survey of the final year, a nutrient variability survey will be performed by obtaining about 10 soil samples from the study site. The soil sample requires collecting a 1 cm x 30 cm soil core from the rooting zone to measure soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability. To perform the nitrogen analyses, the samples would be extracted with saturated KCl within 1-2 hours of collection in the Bowman Lab at CU. Phosphorus analyses would rely on an extraction procedure using modified Bray s solution. A flow-injection colorimetric autoanalyzer (Lachat Instruments, Mequon, Wisconsin) would be used for all the nutrient. 3

As only one of the three years has been completed in this research project, only preliminary data is available at the time. However, once the project has concluded, BNCA will certainly receive a detailed report on the research project results. Preliminary Data At the Tracy Collins site, the average species richness was about 30 plant species per plot. For the entire Tracy Collins site, there were 90 plants identified mostly to the species, if not then to genus (Table 4). For the South Boulder Creek site, the average species richness was about 27 plant species per plot and 111 species in the entire site (Table 5). There were roughly 60 plant species that were found at both research sites. 4

Table 4: Plant Species at Tracy Collins Property Site 1. Achillea lanulosa 31. Eriogonum sp.) 61. Paronychia jamesii 2. Acosta diffusa 32. Erysimum asperum 62. Paronychia sessiliflora 3. Allium textile 33. Gaillardia aristata 63. Pascopyrum smithii 4. Alyssum parviflora 34. Gaura coccinea 64. Penstamon secundafloris 5. Ambrosia psilostachia 35. Gutierreza sarothrae 65. Penstamon virens 6. Andropogon gerardii 36. Helianthus rigidus 66. Physaria sp. 7. Antennaria sp. 37. Hesperostipa comata 67. Poa agassizensis 8. Apocinum carabinum 38. Hetherothica sp. 68. Poa compressa 9. Aristada purpurea 39. Heterotheca foliosa 69. Podospernum sp. 10. Artemesia frigida 40. Heterothica velosa 70. Psorilidium tenuiflorum 11. Artemesia ludoviciana 41. Hypericum perforatum 71. Pterogonum elatum 12. Aster porteri 42. Koeleria macrantha 72. Ratibida columnifera 13. Astragalus shortianus 43. Lactuca serriola 73. Rumex acetorella 14. Astragalus spatulatus 44. Lequerella ludoviciana 74. Schizachyrium scoparium 15. Bouteloua curtipendula 45. Liatrus punctata 75. Scutellaria britanis 16. Bouteloua gracile 46. Linaria dalmatica 76. Silene antirnina 17. Brea arvense 47. Lithospernum sp. 77. Solidago nana 18. Bromus japonicus 48. Lomatium orientale 78. Solidago sp. (unk. 1) 19. Bromus tectorum 49. Muhlenbergia montanum 79. Solidao sp. (unk. 2) 20. Camelina microcarpa 50. Muhlenbergia wrightii 80. Sorghastium avenacum 21. Carex sp. 51. Musineon sp. 81. Sporobolus cryptadras 22. Chicorium intybus 52. Neolepia compeser 82. Sporobolus heterolepco 23. Comandra umbellata 53. Nothocalais cuspidata 83. Stipa occidentalis 24. Convolvulus arvensis 54. Oenetharia vidilosa 84. Talinum parviflorum 25. Coryphantha missouriensis 55. Oenethera howardii 85. Taraxacum officinale 26. Draba reptans 56. Oligosporus campestris 86. Tithalymus montanum 27. Echinocereus viridiflorus 57. Opuntia fragilis 87. Tradescantia occidentalis 28. Elymus elymoides 58. Opuntia macrorhiza 88. Tragapogon dubius ssp. major 29. Eremogone fendleri 59. Oxybaphus linearis 89. Viola nutallii 20. Erigeron flagellaris 60. Oxytropis lambertii 90. Virgulus ericoides 5

Table 5: Plant Species at South Boulder Creek Site 1. Achillea lanulosa 38. Dianthus armeri 75. Oxytropis sericeous 2. Acosta diffusa 39. Dicanthelium oligosanthes 76. Panicum vivgatum 3. Agrostes exarata 40. Echinocereus viridiflorus 77. Penstamon secundaflorus 4. Agrostis gigantea 41. Erigeron flagellaris 78. Penstamon virens 5. Allium textile 42. Eriogonum effusum 79. Phacelia heterophylla 6. Alyssum parviflora 43. Eriogonum umbellatum 80. Plantago lanceaoata 7. Ambrosia psilostachia 44. Erodium cicutarium 81. Plantago patigonica 8. Andropogon gerardii 45. Erysimum asperum 82. Pneumonanthe bigelovii 9. Aphyllon fasiculatum 46. Festuca arundacea 83. Poa agassizensis 10. Arisida purpurea 47. Gaillardia aristata 84. Poa compressa 11.Artemesia frigida 48. Gaura coccinea 85. Podospernum sp. 12. Artemesia ludoviciana 49. Hesperostipa comata 86. Potentilla ambigens 13. Asclepias speciosa 50. Heterotheca foliosa 87. Potentilla pensylvanicas 14. Aster cordineri 51. Heterothica velosa 88. Prunella vulgaris 15. Aster laevis 52. Hippochaete hyemalis 89. Psorilidium tenuifloraum 16. Aster porteri 53. Hypericum perforatum 90. Ratibida columnifera 17. Astragalus shortianus 54. Iris missouriensis 91. Rosea sai or asikalaris 18. Bouteloua gracile 55. Juncus articus 92. Rumex acetorella 19. Brea arvense 56. Juncus longistylis 93. Schizochirium scoparium 20. Brickelia eupatorioides 57. Lactuca serriola 94. Sisymbrium altissimum 21. Bromus japonicus 58. Liatrus punctata 95. Sisynchirium montanum 22. Bromus tectorum 59. Linaria dalmatica 96. Solidago canadaensis 23. Camelina microcarpa 60. Lithospernum sp. 97. Solidago sp. 24. Campanula rotundifolia 61. Lupinus sp. 98. Sorghastrum avenaceum 25. Carduus nutans 62. Medandriam dioicum 99. Sporobolus asper 26. Carex pragacellis 63. Medicago lupilina 100. Sporobolus cryptadras 27. Carex sp. 64. Melilotus alba 101. Sporobolus heterolepis 28. Carduus nutans 65. Neolepia compeser 102. Stipa occidentalis 29. Chicorium intybus 66. Oligoneuron rigidus 103. Talinum parviflorum 30. Circium ungulatum 67. Oligosporus campestris 104. Taraxacum officinale 68. Oligosporous dracumculus? 105. Toxicodendron rynbergii 31. Circium vulgare 32. Comandra umbellata 69. Oenothera villosa 106. Tradescantia occidentalis 107. Tragapogon dubius ssp. major 33. Convolvulus arvensis 70. Onosmodium molle 34. Coryphantha missouriensis 71. Opuntia fragilis 108. Vicia americana 35. Dactylis glomerata 72. Opuntia macrorhiza 109. Viola nutallii 36. Dalea candida 73. Oxalis dilleni 110. Virgulus ericoides 37. Daucus carata 74. Oxybaphus linearis 111. Yucca glauca 6

Budget Accounting General Description Item Descriptions Approximate Amount Photo documentation supplies Camera and memory card $200 Plant mounting supplies Acid free paper, binders, notebooks, etc. $50 Plant survey supplies Marker line, flags, hand lens, misc. $50 Plot marking supplies Nails, washers, measure tapes, hammers, flagging, and other hardware $150 Nitrogen fertilizer Slow release fertilizer $50 Total $500 7