Extended Chandra Multi-Wavelength Project (ChaMPx): Source Catalog and Applications

Similar documents
The Bright Side of the X-ray Sky The XMM-Newton Bright Survey. R. Della Ceca. INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera,Milan

Radio Properties Of X-Ray Selected AGN

Ultraluminous X-ray Sources in Nearby Galaxies

Results from the Chandra Deep Field North

The quest for Type 2 quasars: What are the X-ray observations of optically selected QSOs2 telling us?

GALAXIES. Edmund Hodges-Kluck Andrew Ptak

The Hamburg/RASS Catalogue of Optical Identifications of ROSAT-BSC X-ray Sources

Extragalactic X-ray Surveys: Source Populations and their Evolution. Paul Green SAO

Chandra s view of local op.cally dull X ray bright galaxies. Daryl Haggard CIERA Fellow

Lecture 11: SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio. Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS

X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies

X-raying High-Redshift AGNs and the First Black Holes: From Chandra to Lynx

X ray Survey Results on AGN Physics and Evolution Niel Brandt

Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics

Revealing new optically-emitting extragalactic Supernova Remnants

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

FIGURE 1. The total kev logn-logs determined from several ROSAT surveys as indicated in the plot. Adapted from Hasinger et al.

The BAT AGN Survey - Progress Report J. Tueller, C. Markwardt, L. Winter and R. Mushotzky Goddard Space Flight Center

Multi-wavelength Surveys for AGN & AGN Variability. Vicki Sarajedini University of Florida

The History of Active Galaxies A.Barger, P. Capak, L. Cowie, RFM, A. Steffen, and Y. Yang

XRBs in Star-forming Galaxies X-ray Luminosity Functions Ultra-Luminous X-ray Sources

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The Chandra COSMOS X-ray Survey

Scientific cases for Simbol-X of interest of the Italian community

High Redshift Universe

HARD X-RAY EMITTING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI SELECTED BY THE CHANDRA MULTIWAVELENGTH PROJECT

Paul Sell. University of Wisconsin-Madison Advisor: Christy Tremonti

COMOVING SPACE DENSITY OF X-RAY SELECTED ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

CHARACTERIZATION OF AGN VARIABILITY IN THE OPTICAL AND NIR REGIMES

Identifying distant* hidden monsters with NuSTAR

The parsec scale of. ac-ve galac-c nuclei. Mar Mezcua. International Max Planck Research School for Astronomy and Astrophysics

Galaxies 626. Lecture 10 The history of star formation from far infrared and radio observations

Hunting for Monsters. Selecting and Characterizing Obscured Quasars with WISE Kevin Hainline Hidden Monsters Dartmouth College August 2016

LeMMINGs the emerlin radio legacy survey of nearby galaxies Ranieri D. Baldi

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Dec 1999

ROSAT Roentgen Satellite. Chandra X-ray Observatory

X-ray binaries. Marat Gilfanov MPA, Garching

Investigating Ultraluminous X-ray Sources through multi-wavelength variability, broadband spectra, and theoretical modelling

Soft X-ray Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei. Mat Page

Surveys for high-redshift (z>6) AGN with AXIS (cf. Athena) James Aird. University of Cambridge (-> University of Leicester)

Survey of dusty AGNs based on the mid-infrared all-sky survey catalog. Shinki Oyabu (Nagoya University) & MSAGN team

The History of Active Galaxies A.Barger, P. Capak, L. Cowie, RFM, A. Steffen,W-H Wang and Y. Yang

Few good reasons to hold the meeting in Cervia

The search for. COSMOS and CDFS. Marcella Brusa

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 25 Dec 2018

Ultra Luminous Infared Galaxies. Yanling Wu Feb 22 nd,2005

Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys

The quest for early Black Holes

THE CHAMP EXTENDED STELLAR SURVEY (CHESS): PHOTOMETRIC AND SPECTROSCOPIC PROPERTIES OF SERENDIPITOUSLY DETECTED STELLAR X-RAY SOURCES 1

A new catalogue of ultraluminous X-ray sources (and more!)

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 18 Aug 2001

Gamma-Rays from Radio Galaxies: Fermi-LAT

Galaxies 626. Lecture 9 Metals (2) and the history of star formation from optical/uv observations

The Palermo Swift-BAT Hard X-ray Catalogue

DLAs Probing Quasar Host Galaxies. Hayley Finley P. Petitjean, P. Noterdaeme, I. Pâris + SDSS III BOSS Collaboration 2013 A&A

Astr 2320 Thurs. April 27, 2017 Today s Topics. Chapter 21: Active Galaxies and Quasars

Introduction to AGN. General Characteristics History Components of AGN The AGN Zoo

Background Picture: Millennium Simulation (MPA); Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma satellite (P. Predehl 2011)

A galaxy without its SMBH: implications for feedback

A Unified Model for AGN. Ryan Yamada Astro 671 March 27, 2006

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

Survey of dusty AGNs based on the mid-infrared all-sky survey catalog

Active Galactic Nuclei OIII

Data Release 5. Sky coverage of imaging data in the DR5

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona)

Demographics of radio galaxies nearby and at z~0.55. Are radio galaxies signposts to black-hole mergers?

Empirical Evidence for AGN Feedback

Optical studies of an ultraluminous X-ray source: NGC1313 X-2

v Characteristics v Possible Interpretations L X = erg s -1

Unveiling the Secrets of the Cosmos with the Discovery of the Most Distant Object in the Universe

Properties of Lyman-α and Gamma-Ray Burst selected Starbursts at high Redshifts

Chandra Observation of Point Sources in the X-Ray Elliptical Galaxy NGC 1407

Luminous Quasars and AGN Surveys with ELTs

The bolometric output of AGN in the XMM-COSMOS survey

Chien-Ting Chen! Dartmouth College

IRS Spectroscopy of z~2 Galaxies

WORKSHOP ULXs AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT June 13th 16th, 2016 Strasbourg, France

ChaMP SERENDIPITOUS GALAXY CLUSTER SURVEY

Tidal disruption events from the first XMM-Newton Slew Survey

Stellar populations of quasar host galaxies

Multi epoch variability of αox in the CDFS

e e-03. which is distributed with standard chandra processing. visual inspection are included.

Active Galactic Nuclei SEDs as a function of type and luminosity

Systematic Observation of Long GRB Host Galaxies in the Subaru/Gemini Time Exchange Program

Studying Merger Driven BH Growth with Observations of Dual AGN

A RADIO SEARCH FOR BLACK HOLES IN THE MILKY WAY GLOBULAR CLUSTER M10

The The largest assembly ESO high-redshift. Lidia Tasca & VUDS collaboration

What Can We Learn from Galaxy Clustering 1: Why Galaxy Clustering is Useful for AGN Clustering. Alison Coil UCSD

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 14 Oct 2009

Active Galaxies & Quasars

A confirmed stellar-mass ULX with recurrent X-ray occultations from its precessing disk

Radiation Backgrounds Observations across the Electromagnetic Spectrum. Günther Hasinger, MPE Garching & TUM

Clustering studies of ROSAT/SDSS AGN through cross-correlation functions with SDSS Galaxies

Measuring star formation in galaxies and its evolution. Andrew Hopkins Australian Astronomical Observatory

X-ray flashes and X-ray rich Gamma Ray Bursts

Vivienne Wild. Timing the starburst AGN connection

Chapter 10: Unresolved Stellar Populations

Star Formation Indicators

The Contribution of Active Galactic Nuclei to the Excess Cosmic Radio Background at 1.4 GHz

13.1 Galaxy Evolution: Introduction

Transcription:

Extended Chandra Multi-Wavelength Project (ChaMPx): Source Catalog and Applications Dong-Woo Kim, P. Green, T. L. Aldcroft, W. Barkhouse, D. Haggard, V. Kashyap, A. Mossman, M. A. Agueros, A. Constantin, K. R. Covey, H. Tananbaum, B. Wilkes, & ChaMP Collaboration

Abstract We present new results of the Extended Chandra Multi-wavelength Project (ChaMPx). In addition to our original ChaMP sample where we only used Chandra AO1-2 archival data, we extend to Chandra AO3-6 observations if they are also covered by the SDSS optical images. We cross-correlated Chandra X-ray and SDSS optical sources and visually inspected both X-ray and optical images for each match. Our catalog consists of 13458 X-ray sources of which 6347 sources have optical counterparts and 1347 sources are further identified by optical spectra. We developed sky coverage maps which provide limiting fluxes at every sky location covered in our X-ray dataset. We summarize recent results from ChaMP/SDSS samples of ~1100 QSOs, ~350 stars, ~150 normal galaxies serendipitously detected in ChaMPx.

Extended ChaMP (ChaMPx) Equatorial coordinates First ChaMP Catalog (M. Kim et al 2007) 149 observations from Chandra observing cycle AO1-2 6600 X-ray sources from ~10 deg 2 of the sky 1 Galactic coordinates ChaMPx Additional 258 obs from Chandra observing cycle AO3-6 also covered by SDSS DR5 optical images 13458 X-ray sources from ~20 deg 2 of the sky

ChaMPx Source Catalog X-ray information for 13458 sources (select sources detected in I0-3 and S2-3; excluded false sources, e.g., afterglows) Multi-band X-ray count rate, flux, luminosity (when z is known) X-ray hardness ratio, colors Time variability Position uncertainty (by empirically determined formula) ** Source detection limits (for both detected and undetected sources) Optical match and imaging information for ~50% (6347 sources) x-o distance ** matching confidence (given by visual inspection) broad band magnitudes/colors photometric z for 4953 sources (~3000 w/ z=0.01-0.9) Optical spectroscopic information for ~10% (1347 sources) spectroscopic identification spectroscopic z for 1196 sources (This catalog will be available in the summer.)

X-ray Source Detection Limits Red 0<OAA<4 Blue 4<OAA<8 Green 8<OAA<12 90% 50% and 90% detection fractions 50% Threshold map is generated by wtransform (part of wavdetect) It is then calibrated by simulations to estimate a detection limit in a given confidence. This procedure also tested and confirmed with 21 CDF-S obsids (1.8 Msec exposure). applicable to (1) estimate detection upper limit for a given undetected object (2) determine sky area (as a function of fx) for a given sample

X-ray-Optical Source Match Visual inspection Every source was visually inspected and the match confidence was assigned We use only reliable matches with a high confidence X-ray optical source position offset 80% of matches within 1 arcsec 85% of matches within 95% X-ray position uncertainties which was empirically determined by simulations (dashed lines for the cumulative fraction)

Source Types Comparison of ID/types: spec_type, photoz_type, ext_type (optical extendedness) Types determined by optical spectra: 659 BLAGN 245 NELG 247 ALG 190 stars comparison between spec_type and photoz_type comparison between spec_type and ext_type ------------------------------------------------- photoz_type total BLAGN NELG ALG STAR ------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- -0.1 0.0 583 35+ 22 72 15 spec_type ext_type=3 ext_type=6 0.0 0.1 293 1 16 23 21 (extended) (point-like) 0.1 0.2 221* 2 13 12 5 ---------------------------------------------- 0.2 0.3 215* 2 15 5 4 BLAGN 80 397 0.3 0.4 200* 6 10 6 1 NELG 138 9 0.4 0.5 181* 7 15 5 0 ALG 126 6 0.5 0.6 203* 5 5 4 1 contin 2 5 0.6 0.7 167* 5 14 1 0 STAR 5 49 0.7 0.8 202 11 12 1 3 unclass 0 1 0.8 0.9 204 11 8 0 1 NULL 2136+ 2003++ 0.9 1.0 247 19 6 0 0 ---------------------------------------------- 1.0 1.1 2241** 357 9 1 3 ------------------------------------------------- + Wrong photoz_type + 75% of 2136 optically extended objects (photometric z is way off from spec z) are likely galaxies (NELG+ALG). ** 2241 objects (identified as photoz_type>1) are ++ 85% of 2003 optically point-like objects likely BLAGNs with a very small (~3%) contamination are likely BLAGNs * 73% of 1187 objects (photoz_type = 0.1-0.7) are NELG + ALG.

X-ray to optical flux ratio, F XO [ log f XO = log f X + r/2.5 + 5.36 (f X = X-ray flux in 0.5-8 kev) ] spec type log fxo<-2-2:-1 >-1 photoz type log fxo<-2-2:-1 >-1 BLAGN 0 38 587-0.1 0.0 76 100 405 star 57 61 15 0.3 0.4 7 25 167 NULL 97 364 4710 0.5 0.6 6 23 170 273 555 5515 0.7 0.8 8 22 171 0.8 0.9 4 8 192 spec type vs fxo photoz type vs fxo ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- NELG 39 49 124 0.0 0.1 41 86 166 ALG 79 42 72 0.1 0.2 18 42 160 conti 1 1 6 0.2 0.3 8 40 167 unclass 0 0 1 0.4 0.5 6 25 150 ------------------------------------------------- 0.6 0.7 4 18 145 ext type vs fxo 0.9 1.0 6 4 236 ---------------------------------------------- 1.0 1.1 6 59 2174 ext type log fxo<-2-2:-1 >-1 ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- 190 452 4303 extended 128 293 2057 point-like 62 159 2246 NULL 83 103 1212 ---------------------------------------------- 273 555 5515 Object types and f XO can be used to distinguish different samples. e.g., normal galaxies can be selected by the following criteria (to effectively exclude AGNs): (log f XO < -2) & (spec type = NELG or ALG) or (log f XO < -2) & (ext type = extended) & (photoz type < 1.0)

ChaMPx Quasars P. Green et al. 2008 submitted to ApJ 1135 X-ray detected quasars in z = 0.2-5.4, representing 36 Msec of eff. exposure (57 QSOs at z > 3) No evidence of evolution out to z=5 for either spectral index (Γ) or α ox Significant hardening toward higher Lx (and smaller α ox )

ChaMPx Stars (ChESS = ChaMP Exended Stellar Survey) K. R. Covey et al. 2008 submitted to ApJ 348 X-ray emitting stars (see poster by Argueros et al. in this meeting)

ChaMPx Normal Galaxies D.-W. Kim et al. 2008 in prep. (preliminary results presented in 2007 Vulcano meeting) - 147 Normal galaxies selected by Fxo, spec type, extendedness, photoz type with spec z (125) and/or photo z - Log(N)-log(S) and X-ray luminosity function of normal galaxies - ULX (off-nuclear luminous X-ray sources): found in ~10% of normal galaxies - E+A galaxy: 3 candidates with no intrinsic absorption (against dusty starbursts) - Additionally, 66 XBONG candidates: heavily obscured in the high luminosity end

Log N-Log S for Normal Galaxies For completeness, we further limit our sample to 24 obsids with full optical imaging spectroscopic obs. Calculate X-ray sky coverage as a function of S X by extensive simulations (Kim, M. et al. 07) A similar method as applied for LMXB s XLF (Kim & Fabbiano 03, 04) same shape in S-band and B-band our slope = 1.5 steeper than CXB (0.7 below the break) less steep than CDF-N (1.74± 0.3) normal galaxies will exceed in number over the AGN population (Bauer et al. 05) at faint F X ~10-18 erg s -1 cm -2 (lower than the previous estimate) ChaMP logn-logs (Kim et al. 2004)

from E-ChaMP out of 6553 x-ray sources with optical ID fxo<0.01 (0.01:0.1) fxo>0.1 ---------------------------------------- extended 111* 260 2750* point src 88 145 3005* Cosmic X-ray background (Hickox and Markevitch 2007) 80% of the total extragalactic CXRB resolved at 1-2 kev, but the remaining CXRB requires logn-logs steeper than that of AGNs subpopulation of normal galaxies (the best fit slope of 1.3)

Off-nuclear ULXs Lehmer et al. (2006) (Ultra-Luminous X-ray Sources) ULX with L X > 10 39 erg s -1 (exceed Eddington L X of stellar mass BH) often found in star burst galaxies in the local universe and known to be correlated with SFR (e.g. Gilfanov et al 2004; Swartz et al 2004) ULX can be used to probe SFR and its increase with z Ptak and Colbert (2004) found 12% of RC3 spiral and Irr galaxies with 1 or more ULX (10 39 erg s -1 ) Lehmer et al. (2006) found 24 ULX candidates from CDFs at z=0.05 0.3 Fraction elevated (~80% confidence) by a factor of 1.9 (+1.4-1.3) from the local value from E-ChaMP (z = 0.01-0.13) Out of 2740 galaxies (Chandra fov, R 25 > 20 and r =15-19 mag and z>0.01), 835 galaxies have the limiting luminosity (L X = 10 41 erg s -1 ) Fraction of galaxies with ULX candidate (Lx > 2 x 10^39 erg/s) = 10% after removing 20% bkg src within 1/2 D25. assuming that all the src in 1/2 x D25 < r < D25 are bkg src the fraction depends on galaxy size 50% increase in bigger galaxies (R < -20 mag) than in smaller (R > -20)

XBONG X-ray Bright Optically Normal Galaxies = ALG with L X > 10 42 erg s -1 known to exist since Einstein (Elvis et al. 1981) Could be intrinsically luminous, but obscured AGN, where the obscuration must be extreme and cover all direction to hide both BL and NL. Out of 21 candidates, 2 heavily obscured. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name net counts r z log fx/fo log Lx HR 1σ limit S H (mag) (erg s -1 ) (lower upper) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CXOMP J105626.8-033721 14.46 86.04 21.26 0.643-0.08 43.36 0.72 (0.63 0.81) CXOMP J205601.2-042955 0.68 9.18 21.33 0.370-0.74 42.09 1.00 (0.68 1.00) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dilution of nuclear emission lines (from type 2) by the stellar light of the host galaxy But no significant distinction between AGN2 and XBONG candidates in Fx, Fo, Lx, Lo Inner radiatively inefficient accretion flow which could in turn produce strong IC X-ray emission (Yuan and Narayan 05)

from E-ChaMP 66 XBONG Candidates (L X > 10 42 and ALG) Lx # <HR> #(HR>0)* ------------------------------------- 40-41 18-0.721506 2 11% 41-42 30-0.703647 3 10% 42-43 16-0.614662 2 13% 43-44 23-0.448117 4 17% 44-45 20 0.075500 11 55% 45-46 6-0.080000 2 33% 10 22 (5 10 22 ) 10 21 (HR > 0 == N H > 10 22 cm -2 at z=0) heavily obscured populations in the luminous end! (Z=1)

E+A Galaxies E+A galaxies strong Balmer absorption lines + no emission in [OII] == Post starbursts with a recent star burst in ~1 Gyr ago, but no sign of current SF What truncates the star formation abruptly? Link to other types of galaxies in their evolutionary path? (blue galaxies at high z, S0 progenitors?) cluster-related mechanism merger/interaction origin (Goto 05: excess local density) dusty starbursts (with current, but hidden star formation) We identified 3 E+A candidates (2 from ChaMP sp + 3 rd one from E-ChaMP, also in Goto 07 sample): --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- name net counts r z log fx/fo log Lx HR 1σ limit S H (mag) (erg s -1 ) (lower upper) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CXOMP J113956.1+660553 17.5 0.0 18.90 0.376-1.96 42.25-1.00 (-1.00-0.82) CXOMP J230243.1+083945 136.5 53.5 19.26 0.438-0.69 43.14-0.44 (-0.53-0.34) 092316.3+311431 8.1 3.6 17.58 0.313-1.11 43.05-0.67 (-0.92-0.36) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All candidates have soft X-ray emission can not be dusty starbursts 1 (+1) has a close companion in ~50 kpc consistent with merger/interaction scenario (Goto 05) X-ray bright E+A phenomenon somehow enhances X-ray emission (?)