Future experiments from the Moon dedicated to the study of the Cosmic Microwave Background

Similar documents
4.3 Planck. Scientific goals. Planck payload

The first light in the universe

Planck 2014 The Microwave Sky in Temperature and Polarisation Ferrara, 1 5 December The Planck mission

Large Scale Polarization Explorer

News from BICEP/Keck Array CMB telescopes

The cosmic background radiation II: The WMAP results. Alexander Schmah

Probing the Dark Ages with 21 cm Absorption

Planck was conceived to confirm the robustness of the ΛCDM concordance model when the relevant quantities are measured with much higher accuracy

Planck Mission and Technology

QUIET-I and QUIET-II:

CMB Polarization Experiments: Status and Prospects. Kuo Assistant Professor of Physics Stanford University, SLAC

Physics of CMB Polarization and Its Measurement

Exploring the primordial Universe with QUBIC

Measurements of Degree-Scale B-mode Polarization with the BICEP/Keck Experiments at South Pole

Short course: 101 level introductory course to provide a foundation for everyone coming to the workshop to understand the field.

The international scenario Balloons, LiteBIRD, PIXIE, Millimetron

PIXIE: The Primordial Inflation Explorer. Al Kogut GSFC

Michel Piat for the BRAIN collaboration

Primordial gravitational waves detected? Atsushi Taruya

Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor. Wednesday, September 25, 13

Polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background: Are Those Guys Serious? Al Kogut Goddard Space Flight Center

CMB studies with Planck

THE PLANCK MISSION The most accurate measurement of the oldest electromagnetic radiation in the Universe

CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation

Lecture 03. The Cosmic Microwave Background

Power spectrum exercise

CMB polarization and cosmology

Introduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?

1. CMB Observations and cosmological constraints

Measurements of the CMB by the PLANCK satellite

The Einstein Polarization Interferometer for Cosmology (EPIC)

Cosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.

QUIET Experiment and HEMT receiver array

PLANCK lately and beyond

Cosmic Microwave Background

Precise measurement of CMB polarisation from Dome-C: the BRAIN and CLOVER experiments

Astr 2320 Thurs. May 7, 2015 Today s Topics Chapter 24: New Cosmology Problems with the Standard Model Cosmic Nucleosynthesis Particle Physics Cosmic

Really, really, what universe do we live in?

Assignments. Read all (secs ) of DocOnotes-cosmology. HW7 due today; accepted till Thurs. w/ 5% penalty

The CMB sky observed at 43 and 95 GHz with QUIET

Planck. Report on the status of the mission Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 9 Dec 2001

Challenges present and future in the observation of the Cosmic Microwave Background

Model Universe Including Pressure

Galaxies 626. Lecture 3: From the CMBR to the first star

An Introduction to Radio Astronomy

Chapter 22 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective. Seventh Edition. The Birth of the Universe Pearson Education, Inc.

THE SPOrt MISSION ON ISSA

Astroparticle physics

Cosmic Microwave Background Introduction

Herschel and Planck: ESA s New Astronomy Missions an introduction. Martin Kessler Schloss Braunshardt 19/03/2009

Estimation of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

Modern Cosmology / Scott Dodelson Contents

PICO - Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins

The Polarimeter for Observing Inflationary Cosmology at the Reionization Epoch (POINCARE)

The Planck Telescope

Cosmic Microwave Background

20 Lecture 20: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation continued

BINGO simulations and updates on the performance of. the instrument

Anisotropy Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background

Lecture 09. The Cosmic Microwave Background. Part II Features of the Angular Power Spectrum

Cosmic microwave background radiation

CMB Polarization and Cosmology

Microcosmo e Macrocosmo

Rayleigh scattering:

MoBiKID Kinetic Inductance Detectors for up-coming B-mode satellite experiments

Brief Introduction to Cosmology

An Introduction to Radio Astronomy

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Detection of B-mode Polarization at Degree Scales using BICEP2. The BICEP2 Collaboration

What I heard about Planck Eiichiro Komatsu (MPA) December 9, 2014 December 22, 2014

Simulating Cosmic Microwave Background Fluctuations

Cosmology with CMB & LSS:

Lorenzo Moncelsi. SPIDER Probing The Dawn Of Time From Above The Clouds

SPIDER: A Balloon-Borne Polarimeter for Measuring Large Angular Scale CMB B-modes

Toward an Understanding of Foregrounds in the BICEP2 Region

M.Bersanelli Physics Department, University of Milano. IAP, June 2012 M. Bersanelli Beyond CORE Workshop

Advanced Topic in Astrophysics Lecture 1 Radio Astronomy - Antennas & Imaging

HOW TO GET LIGHT FROM THE DARK AGES

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES

Physics Nobel Prize 2006

Polarization from Rayleigh scattering

Radiation processes and mechanisms in astrophysics I. R Subrahmanyan Notes on ATA lectures at UWA, Perth 18 May 2009

Physics 661. Particle Physics Phenomenology. October 2, Physics 661, lecture 2

Constraining the topology of the Universe using CMB maps

A100 Exploring the Universe Big Bang Theory and the Early Universe. Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy

SKY POLARISATION OBSERVATORY (SPOrt): A PROJECT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION

Forthcoming CMB experiments and expectations for dark energy. Carlo Baccigalupi

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 19 May 1997

Ringing in the New Cosmology

Contents. 2 Curriculum Vitae Summary of Work Effort Current and Pending Support 43

Space Cryogenics at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

CMB polarization anisotropies from cosmological reionization: extension to B-modes

Imprint of Scalar Dark Energy on CMB polarization

Testing parity violation with the CMB

The Early Universe John Peacock ESA Cosmic Vision Paris, Sept 2004

Data analysis of massive data sets a Planck example

Observational Cosmology

Concordance Cosmology and Particle Physics. Richard Easther (Yale University)

Astr 102: Introduction to Astronomy. Lecture 16: Cosmic Microwave Background and other evidence for the Big Bang

Transcription:

Future experiments from the Moon dedicated to the study of the Cosmic Microwave Background C. Burigana, A. De Rosa, L. Valenziano, R. Salvaterra, P. Procopio, G. Morgante, F. Villa, and N. Mandolesi

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) Anisotropies Angular power spectrum Polarization P 2 = Q 2 + U 2 Example: Scattering Thomson of radiation with quadrupole anisotropy generates linear polarization Spectrum Photon distribution function

Motivation & context The absence of atmospheric emission and radio-millimetre interferences + the feasibility of having in situ instrumentation of remarkable size up-gradable with time the Moon is a potentially ideal place for accurate measurements of CMB: polarization anisotropies, total intensity anisotropies at small angular scales, spectral distortions Although extremely challenging, these kinds of measures are of fundamental relevance for our understanding of the cosmic evolution, from the epoch of inflation to the plasma era, and, finally, to the epoch of cosmological re-ionization related to the cosmic structure formation We carried out a feasibility study of experiments dedicated to the CMB B-mode polarization and to absolute temperature measurements at centimetre and decimetre wavelengths Italian Vision for Moon Exploration, Observation of the Universe from the Moon (Studio Osservazione dell Universo dalla Luna), Final Report, Contratto I/032/06/04 - ASI Perspectives for future experiments and studies on cosmic background radiation from the Moon (WP1420, WP1430, WP1430cm) by C. Burigana, L. Valenziano, A. De Rosa, R. Salvaterra, P. Procopio, G. Morgante, F. Villa, N. Mandolesi

Polarization anisotropies of CMB

WMAP 2003-2006 Courtesy WMAP Science Team

Multifrequency is needed! Courtesy WMAP Science Team

WMAP 3y Power Spectrum

Planck perspectives: TT, TE, EE

Measure of E and B modes of the CMB primordial polarisation anisotropy Synchrotron range without Galactic cut The same but excluding Galactic plane or in a clean region Sensitivity required to accurately determine E and B modes. 70GHz case, not observable from the Earth, where foreground contamination is minimum. La Porta et al., 2006

B-mode polarization APS from lensing need for about 10 arcmin resolution

Constraining Neutrino Mass and Cosmic Reionization with CMB Polarization as a function of neutrino mass Measurable in E mode Small effect in total intensity reionization bump Burigana et al., 2004

Sensitivity: a very high sensitivity is required since the predicted level of the signal is a free parameter of the theory. Therefore, the working hypothesis depends on the theoretical model considered, in this way requirements can be obtained in detail. The sensitivity requirement of the detector is S < 0.1 mk * sec-1/2. With this sensitivity, or better, the B modes can be measured till multipoles l ~ 500 for a signal dt > 0.1 mk and till l ~ 200-300 for dt > 0.01 mk at clean cosmological frequencies. FWHM: 1 arcmin a 100 GHz Lifetime: 4 full sky surveys. This requirement reflects the trade-off between detector s sensitivity and redundancy of observations to allow an accurate separation of systematic effects. Number of detectors: at least N*1000, where N is the frequency band. The millimetre detectors, both bolometers and radiometers, have sensitivity near the quantum limit. Therefore, in order to obtain the sensitivity required by the predicted observational time it is necessary to have a number of detectors of the order of thousands. This number is necessary not only in cosmological bands, but also in the near bands in order to remove the foregrounds with a comparable accuracy.

Technology: HEMT from ~ 20 to 100; Bolometers from ~ 70 to 500 GHz. The detectors based on HEMT are used, for CMB measurements, in experiment on Earth and on the Planck mission. They proved great stability, reliability, cleanness in measurements and they can be used at temperatures of almost 20K; this temperatures can be obtained with active coolers. Recent developments raised the operational frequency over 300 GHz with predicted sensitivity of almost 2.5 times the quantum noise. They are candidates as ideal detectors for frequencies above 100 GHz. See the following figures where measurements and LAN HEMT InP models with gate length 35 nm are reported. The bolometers actually are the most sensitive millimetre, but the cryogenic apparatus needed to reach a temperature of almost 100 mk is more complex. They are the only available broad band detectors at high frequencies. It is important that in a mission like this, where the systematic effects are the limiting effect for the observations, the technologies of observations have a band of overlap.

Cryogenics: According to the mission design (single payload, separate payload), to the number and to the type of detectors and their requisites of dissipation, different cryogenic chains can be hypothesized. As example we report an evolution of the chain used on Planck satellite, where the two different chains cohabit in the same focal plane. From T-env to ~50K passive cooling through radiators (V-Grooves like), located always in a area of shade. This radiators can be joined with mechanical coolers active at low vibrations or of sorption-cooler type. From ~50K to ~20-30K (Operating temperature for detectors based on HEMT technology and pre-cooling phase for cryogenic phases at lower temperatures), sorption/jt cooler with H2 or Ne; otherwise mechanical coolers can be used (as example a pulse tube with a small level of vibrations). Even if theoretically possible, the use of cryogenic liquids or solids H2 o Ne is not favoured due to the operating complexity.

From ~20-30K to ~5K (pre-cooling for 0.1K cooler): sorption/jt He cooler, technology under development, for systems of great heat-lift, by different research institutes. Also in this case cryogenic liquids can be used, with the remarks previously listed. Depending on the level of vibrations admitted by the microphony of detectors, mechanical cryogenerators (pulse tube) can be used. From ~5K to 0.1K: the technology for obtaining temperatures of almost 100 mk with a high heat lift is of dilution kind. The system used on Planck, for example, consents to cool more than 50 detectors at 100 mk, but its operative time is limited by the available quantity of He3, which is dispersed in space at the and of the cycle. For a new generation mission is necessary to develop new closed-cycle systems, which theoretically allow a infinite operative time.

Architecture based on OMT for an accurate separation of polarized signals. The Ortho Mode Transducer are the components that allow the most clean separation of the polarized components in the millimetre range. A mission dedicated to the measurements of CMB polarization with a so high sensitivity requires a separation of the components of almost 60dB.

Instead of a single big experiment, we can assume to have a set of 4 smaller payloads which exploit at full the synergies. In this case a excessively big antenna for high frequencies and the complications deriving from a very crowded focal region could be avoided. One (or two, given the low frequency) at low frequencies: HEMTbased for foregrounds measurements (from 20 to 60 GHz) One at intermediate frequencies: HEMT and/or Bolometers (e.g. from 70 to 200 GHz) for the cosmology One at high frequency: Bolometers (e.g. from 300 to 500 GHz) for foregrounds measurements.

Spectral Distortions of CMB

CMBR SPECTRUM T 0 = 2.725 ± 0.002 K (Mather et al. 1999) Redshift Dimensioneless frequency Has the CMBR a black body spectrum?

CMB Spectrum measures Recent measures of CMB spectrum (collected by Burigana and Salvaterra, 1999) λ>1cm: typical error > 0.1 K FIRAS measures: typical error ±0.0001 K

Impact of various sources of errors: note the atmosphere relevance

Spectral distortions In the primordial universe some processes can lead the matter-radiation fluid out of the thermal equilibrium (energy dissipation because of density fluctuations,physical processes out of the equilibrium, radiative decay of particles, energy release related to the first stages of structures formation, free-free distortions) The photon distribution function isn t a Planckian one The Kompaneets equation in cosmological contest provides the best tool to compute the evolution of the photon distribution function, but a numerical code is needed! KYPRIX An extremely precise fortran based code, able to simulate the effects of the primordial physical processes that can affect the thermodynamic equilibrium of the CMBR

Primordial distortions BIG BANG Cosmological applications z term z BE z z ric z today Bose-Einstein like spectrum Superposition of black bodies with µ function of X where Free-free distortions Late distortions Related (mainly) to the reionization history of the universe Cosmological application of a numerical code for the solution of the Kompaneets equation, P.Procopio and C.Burigana, INAF-IASF Bologna, Internal Report, 421

Theoretical CMB Spectral Distortions Middle age Free-free Early Bose-Einstein like Late Comptonization like Distorted spectra in the presence of a late energy injection with Δε/ε i = 5 x 10-6 plus an early/intermediate energy injection with Δε/ε i = 5 x 10-6 occurring at y h =5, 1, 0.01 (from the bottom to the top; in the figure the cases at y h =5 and 1 are indistiguishable at short wavelengths; solid lines) and plus a free-free distortion with y B =10-6 (dashes).

T e /T R = 10 4 z R = 20 dε/ε = 10-5 Cosmological application One of the representative cases Distortions due to reionization of the universe at low redshifts Ω m = 1 Ω Λ = 0 Ω m = 0.29 Ω Λ = 0.73

In the Planckian Hypothesis: limits achievable with a new low frequency experiment DIMES Example: 6 freq. channels between 2 & 90 GHz Limits achievable with a low frequency experiment with the same FIRAS sensitivity Current limits Hypothesis to be checked Burigana and Salvaterra, 2003 Cosmic time

CMB spectrum: Key parameters Configuration A and B Frequency operating range: 0.4 50 GHz (75-0.6 cm) Spectral resolution: 10% Angular resolution: 7 /8 Sensitivity: < 1 mk sec -1/2 Field of View: > 10 4 deg 2 Final sensitivity (E.O.L) better than 0.1 mk per resolution element Low sidelobes optics Ground shield avoid ground signal pickup thermal stability Channel Frequency (GHz) Wavelength (cm) 1 100 0.300000 2 63.0957 0.475468 3 39.8107 0.753566 4 25.1189 1.19432 5 15.8489 1.89287 6 10.0000 3.00000 7 6.30957 4.75468 8 3.98107 7.53566 9 2.51189 11.9432 10 1.58489 18.9287 11 1.00000 30.0000 12 0.630957 47.5468 13 0.398107 75.3566

Calibrator requirements Return Loss < -60dB in the whole frequency range Intercalibration between frequency bands better than 30 μk Thermal stability better than 1 mk with well sampled temperature monitoring (temperature accuracy better than 10 μk) The ARCADE calibrator

Radiometers Differential radiometers (using low noise amplifiers) Absolute calibration One of the ARCADE radiometers (Kogut, 2002)

Sketch of the large payload Mass: ~1000 Kg, height ~ 6 m, deployed in a shaded crater

Scientific performance as function of (low) frequency coverage C = 2, 5, 8 freq. channels, 0.48, 1.9, 7.54 cm D = 3, 6, 9 freq. channels, 0.75, 3.0, 11.9 cm E = 3, 5, 7 freq. Channels, 0.75, 1.9, 4.75 cm R = recent data @ λ 1cm F = COBE/FIRAS Note that even with observations @ λ 5cm the improvement is very good!

New Concept Design Requirements Mass < 300 Kg Simplify cooling system Location at the pole Continuous operation (day and night) Simplify pointing system Autonomous, unmanned operation Simplify deployment

Reduce Dimension and Mass Reduce the number of channels Use a smaller payload Use a smaller cooler Select highest frequency bands Reduce horn and calibrator dimension Enlarge FOV (14 FWHM) Reduce horn dimensions Passive cooling for the optics Use a smaller cooler Introduce steerable optical system Reduce horn dimension Avoid an alt-az mounting

New Location Select a location at the Pole Reduce the size of passive cooling radiators Reduce the observed portion of the sky (acceptable from the scientific point of view) Avoid rover and deployment system (reduce mass) Shaded crated location not strictly required Simplified deployment on the final site Operation on the landing module possible Power generation from solar panels on the payload Operation from the near side of the Moon Higher frequency less affected by man-made interference

New Payload Concept (conf. E) 3 channels 6 GHz 15 GHz 63 GHz FOV: 14 deg Passive cooling for the optics Steerable optical element at horn aperture 63GHz Channel Internal Reference @20K Radiometer @20K 15GHz Channel Thermal Link @20K 6GHz Channel Steerable Mirror Feed Horn Absolute Reference@4K Thermal Link @4K Cold Head

New Payload Concept - I 15GHz Channel 63GHz Channel Cold Head 6GHz Channel Pointing system obtained using steerable mirrors and Moon rotation Electonics box Compressor

New Payload Concept - II

Location External passive cooling Shield Internal passive cooling shield Solar panel Instrument Cooler s Radiators Middle Shield Location at the Pole Passive cooling possible. Smaller radiators Easy deployment, unmanned operation Shields deployed in-situ Operation from the lander possible Solar panels on the payload

Estimated mass: < 200 Kg In situ overall dimension: diameter: 8 m, height: 3 m Passive shield deployed Estimated power requirements: 3 kw Continuous operation possible

CONCLUSIONS I CMB general Moon advantages: absence of atmospheric emission and radio-millimetre interferences in situ instrumentation of remarkable size up-gradable with time Moon is a potentially ideal place for accurate measurements of CMB of very high scientific interest: B-mode Polarization Anisotropy (large equipments): inflation physics lensing cosmic reionization (through B & extremely accurate E mode) Spectral Distortions in particular at λ > 1 cm ( large equipments): cosmic reionization (FF & Compt. Dist.) dissipation processes @ various cosmic scales (FF, Compt,, BE) particle decays & annihilations (BE, full shape)

CONCLUSIONS II CMB spectrum The Moon is a unique opportunity for accurate cm & dm CMB spectrum measures free from atmosphere contamination dm observations requires 10 3 Kg experiments cm observations need 10 2 Kg experiments and represents, @ 0.1 mk sensivity, a great improvement with respect to the current observation status in particular for free-free distortions & BE-like (early) distortions A compact design for early cm experiments has been proposed Definitive cm & dm missions will map the cosmic thermal history with high precision up redshifts of ~ 10 7 Options: The payload can be integrated with the lander that could supply power No critical dependence on choice of exact position, provided that it is well known Possible implementation on free-flyer, using any available Moon mission

Thanks for the attention!