FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

Similar documents
CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors]

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project

2011 South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process. Executive Summary

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

Traffic Impact Study

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output

Directions to MOVBL fields 9-10 & 11-12

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

FINAL REPORT. City of Toronto. Contract Project No: B

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL IV

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

Signalized Intersections

South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report

A Study of Red Light Cameras in Kansas City, MO

Brandywine Road Speed Study FINAL REPORT

Appendix C Traffic Study

I-95/I-85 INTERCHANGE ROADWAY SAFETY ASSESSMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Monroe County: Key West and Lower Keys

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11. Then, I-10 West at Resler closes for 27 hours on Feb 25

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015

Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

TRAFFIC FORECAST METHODOLOGY

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE

Transportation and Road Weather

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017.

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY...

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

Appendix I: Traffic Study

Application of Global Positioning System (GPS) to Travel Time and Delay Measurements

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA

TO THE REPORT: A STRATEGIC PLAN TO REDUCE VEHICLE- ANIMAL ACCIDENTS IN NORTHEAST OHIO

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance

Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011

PROPOSED PROJECT. Section PROJECT DESCRIPTION

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672

US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study

Solar Powered Illuminated RPMs

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006

GIS-BASED VISUALIZATION FOR ESTIMATING LEVEL OF SERVICE Gozde BAKIOGLU 1 and Asli DOGRU 2

West Tennessee Construction June 14-21, 2017

March Grade Crossing Analysis

CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

Annual Collision Report

Perth County Road Fatal Head-on Collision - A Common and Dangerous Issue

ACCESSIBILITY OF INTERMODAL CENTERS STUDY

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity

PENNSTATE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2016

Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

EXAMINATION OF THE SAFETY IMPACTS OF VARYING FOG DENSITIES: A CASE STUDY OF I-77 IN VIRGINIA

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

Long-Term Evaluation of the Operational Performance of Fixed Time Ramp Metering Control Strategy: A Freeway Corridor Study

Montmorency County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

2012 South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program

PATREC PERSPECTIVES Sensing Technology Innovations for Tracking Congestion

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

Montmorency County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

2015 Grand Forks East Grand Forks TDM

Portable Changeable Message Sign (PCMS) Speed Study

GIS ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

Application of Global Positioning System (GPS) to Travel Time And Delay Measurements. Summer 2005

CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design

TMC Monthly Operational Summary

Morgantown, West Virginia. Adaptive Control Evaluation, Deployment, & Management. Andrew P. Nichols, PhD, PE

The World Bank China Wuhan Second Urban Transport (P112838)

CHAPTER 3 TRANSPORTATION

A More Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment: Flood Damage in Virginia Beach

North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned

Appendix B. Traffic Analysis Report

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

I. M. Schoeman North West University, South Africa. Abstract

California Experience With Inside Shoulder Removals

Transcription:

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report Local Transportation and Traffic Data Travel Time and Delay Data for Belpre and Marietta, Ohio Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre (OH) and Marietta (OH) Fiscal Year 2010 Report WOOD WASHINGTON WIRT INTERSTATE PLANNING COMMISION An affiliate agency of the MID-OHIO VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL Parkersburg, West Virginia 1-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 1.0 Introduction... 1-1 1.1 Travel Time... 1-2 1.2 Travel Delay... 1-2 1.3 Travel Time and Delay Surveys... 1-2 1.4 Survey Locations... 1-2 2.0 Travel Time and Delay Procedures... 2-1 2.1 Purpose... 2-1 2.2 Definitions... 2-1 2.3 Survey Methodology... 2-2 2.4 Analysis... 2-3 2.5 Average Speeds... 2-4 2.6 Delay at Specific Locations... 2-4 3.0 Travel Time and Delay Analysis... 3-1 3.1 OH SR 618 or Washington Boulevard... 3-1 3.1.1 Historical Travel Time and Delay Comparisons... 3-1 3.1.2 Analysis of Travel Time... 3-8 3.1.3 Analysis of Travel Speed... 3-11 3.1.4 Analysis of Travel Delay... 3-14 3.2 Ohio State Route 7... 3-17 3.2.1 Historical Travel Time and Delay Comparisons... 3-17 3.3 Ohio State Route 60... 3-22 3.3.1 Historical Travel Time and Delay Comparisons... 3-22 Table of Contents i

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Figure 1-1: Travel Time and Delay Survey Corridors in OH... 1-4 Figure 3-1: OH SR 618/Washington Boulevard Corridor... 3-2 Table 3-1: Travel Time and Delay Summary for OH SR 618/Washington Boulevard... 3-3 Figure 3-2: Historic Summary of Average Travel Time on the OH SR 618 Corridor... 3-4 Figure 3-3: Historic Summary of Average Travel Speed on the OH SR 618 Corridor... 3-4 Figure 3-4: Historic Summary of Average Total Delay Per Run on the OH SR 618 Corridor... 3-5 Figure 3-5: 5-year Travel Time History on the OH 618 Corridor... 3-6 Figure 3-6: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time EB AM... 3-9 Figure 3-7: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time WB AM... 3-9 Figure 3-8: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time EB PM... 3-10 Figure 3-9: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time WB PM... 3-10 Figure 3-10: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed EB AM... 3-12 Figure 3-11: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed WB AM... 3-12 Figure 3-12: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed EB PM... 3-13 Figure 3-13: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed WB PM... 3-13 Figure 3-14: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay EB AM... 3-15 Figure 3-15: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay WB AM... 3-15 Figure 3-16: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay EB PM... 3-16 Figure 3-17: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay WB PM... 3-16 Figure 3-18: OH SR 7 Corridor... 3-18 Table 3-2: Travel Time and Delay Summary for the OH SR 7 Corridor... 3-19 Figure 3-19: Historic Summary of Average Travel Time on the OH SR 7 Corridor... 3-20 Figure 3-20: Historic Summary of Average Travel Speed on the OH SR 7 Corridor... 3-20 Figure 3-21: Historic Summary of Average Total Delay Per Run on the OH SR 7 Corridor... 3-21 Figure 3-22: OH SR 60 Corridor... 3-23 Table 3-3: Travel Time and Delay Summary for the OH SR 60 Corridor... 3-24 Figure 3-23: Historic Summary of Average Travel Time on the OH SR 60 Corridor... 3-25 Figure 3-24: Historic Summary of Average Travel Speed on the OH SR 60 Corridor... 3-25 Figure 3-25: Historic Summary of Average Total Delay Per Run on the OH SR 60 Corridor... 3-26 Figure 3-26: 5-year Travel Time History on the OH SR 60 Corridor... 3-27 Table of Contents ii

Executive Summary The Cities of Parkersburg and Vienna, WV, and Belpre and Marietta, OH are located in the Mid-Ohio Valley region along Ohio River and are a part of the Wood-Washington- Wirt (WWW) Interstate Planning Commission s transportation modeling network. WWW continually collects and records transportation and traffic data within its transportation network such as physical street conditions, traffic control, traffic volumes, traffic patterns, travel time, travel delay, accident information, and other general transportation data. This Continuing Planning Program Local Transportation and Traffic Data Product Report (Report) is a collection of travel time and delay data for seven specific corridors within the WWW study area. The purpose of this document is to record and document these performance measures on the selected corridors. These corridors were selected for evaluation because there were identified as congested corridors or were perceived by the public as congested corridors. Travel time and delay surveys or runs were conducted during the morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hour traffic times for each corridor. The AM runs were conducted from 7AM to 9AM and the PM runs were conducted from 3PM to 6PM. This Report presents the travel time and delay data for those corridors in the Ohio (OH) portion of the study area from July 1, 2009 to June 31, 2010. It also includes a summary of data from previous fiscal year studies. Information on the West Virginia (WV) corridors is documented in a separate report and is available upon request. The OH corridors are listed below with a description of the location, longest travel time, and location of worst delay for the study period. The OH SR 618 (Washington Boulevard) westbound (WB) corridor starts at 5th and Ann Streets in Parkersburg and ends at SR 339 west of Belpre. The eastbound (EB) corridor runs from SR 339 west of Belpre to the intersection of 4th and Ann Streets in Parkersburg. This corridor is 5.4 miles in length and has an unimpeded travel time of 8 minutes 23 seconds. The longest average travel Executive Summary 1

times occurred during the EB AM survey and the EB PM survey. Both of them lasted for 10 minutes 33 seconds. The longest individual delay lasted 1 minute 6 seconds at the intersection of OH SR 618 and Main Street in Belpre during WB AM peak runs. The OH SR 7 corridor starts at Acme Street in Marietta and ends at the entrance of Dimex Corporation in Reno. This corridor is 4.45 miles long and has an unimpeded travel time of 4 minutes 2 seconds. As a result of on-going construction activities. Travel time and delay surveys were not conducted in FY09. The OH SR 60 corridor in Marietta starts at the intersection of SR 7 (Pike St.) and Wayne St. and ends at the intersection of Muskingum Dr. (SR 60) and Colegate Dr. This corridor is 3.25 miles in length and takes 5 minutes 51 seconds to travel at the speed limit with no delays. Travel time and delay surveys were not conducted along this corridor due to ongoing construction activities. Travel times and delay data for each corridor as well as speed information are presented in the detailed analysis section of this report. Information from previous corridor runs is also provided for comparison, and to establish a historical database of information. Executive Summary 2

1.0 Introduction This Continuing Planning Program Local Transportation and Traffic Data Product Report (Report) is a collection of travel time and delay data for seven specific corridors within the WWW study area. Corridors were selected for study based on congestion or perceived congestion and those roadways that were most heavily traveled in the region based on ADT. WWW began conducting travel time and delay surveys for select corridors within the city limits of Belpre and Marietta, OH, and Vienna and Parkersburg, WV. Survey data was documented in Continuing Planning Program Local Transportation and Traffic Data Product Reports from Fiscal Year 1999 (FY99) to the present and is updated annually. WWW defines each fiscal year as the time from July 1 to June 31. This Report represents current conditions and provides a measure to determine the effectiveness of past improvements that may have been implemented along these corridors and trends in travel time and delay patterns. Although the purpose of this report is not to draw conclusions or recommendations from the data, it may serve to aid in the identification for project need and justification along the corridors. This Report supplements prior Reports to maintain a historical database of travel time and delay conditions. However, due to variances in the transportation position within the WWW organization, some data is unavailable or incomplete. Specific impacts to this report will be highlighted as they occur. This Report presents travel time and delay survey data for those corridors in the Ohio portion of the study area for FY10. Some historical comparisons are also provided. Information on the West Virginia corridors is available upon request. Introduction 1-1

1.1 Travel Time Travel time is a measure of transportation system performance and is measured by recording the amount of time it takes to reach control points along a corridor from beginning to end. Control points are discussed further in Section 2 of this Report. 1.2 Travel Delay Travel delay is also a measure of transportation system performance and can be caused by a variety of conditions. Bus stops, accidents, pedestrian or bicycle crossing, traffic signals, and turning movements are a few examples of factors impacting travel delay. Travel delay is a timed measure of where and why a delay occurred. Delay is timed and documented when the survey vehicle is slowed to a speed of 10 MPH or less. 1.3 Travel Time and Delay Surveys Travel time and delay surveys or runs were conducted during the morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hour traffic times for each corridor. The AM runs were conducted from 7AM to 9AM and the PM runs were conducted from 3PM to 6PM. 1.4 Survey Locations A map of the survey corridors is included on Figure 1-1. The corridors are as follows: Washington Boulevard (in Belpre, OH) from 5th and Ann Street in Parkersburg, WV to SR 339 west of Belpre, OH. OH SR 60 (in Marietta, OH) from the intersection of SR 7 (Pike Street) and Wayne Street to the intersection with Colegate Drive. SR 7 from Court/Lafayette Streets (in Marietta, OH) to Dimex Corporation in Reno, OH. Although this Report does not include travel time and delay survey information for WV, the following corridors are included in that Report: Introduction 1-2

Emerson Avenue from 30th Street to Cypress St. in Parkersburg. Murdoch/Grand Central Avenue o Northbound from 8th and Ann Streets in Parkersburg, WV to 28th Street in Vienna, WV. o Southbound from 28th Street in Vienna, WV to 4th and Ann Streets in Parkersburg, WV. 7th Street from the I-77 interchange to Quincy Street in Parkersburg, WV. WV SR 14 from north of Camden Ave. in Parkersburg, WV to Lost Pavement Road in Pettyville, WV. Introduction 1-3

Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission 26 Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Parkersburg, Vienna, Belpre, and Marietta FIGURE 1-1 31 TRAVEL DELAY CORRIDORS IN OHIO AND WEST VIRGINIA Legend : WV 7th Street WV Emerson Avenue WV Murdoch/Grand Central Avenue WV State Route 14 OH State Route 60 OH State Route 7 OH State Route 618 (Washington Boulevard) 0 3 Miles Prepared by : Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission 6 1-4

2.0 Travel Time and Delay Procedures The following sub-sections describe the purpose, methodologies, and analysis procedures utilized in the development of this Report for the OH corridors. 2.1 Purpose As described in Section 1.0 of this report, travel time and delay are measures of transportation system performance. Travel time and delay surveys are conducted to evaluate the quality of traffic movement along a roadway and determine the locations, types, and extent of traffic delays by using a moving test vehicle. There are many uses for the data generated by this Report, including: Comparison of operational conditions before and after an intersection or roadway improvement. Prioritization of system improvements. Determining Level of Service (LOS) of a roadway or intersection. Determining the need for improvements such as traffic signal timing, safety, traffic channelization, or the addition of turn lanes. The identification of traffic congestion and potential causes. Generating travel-time contour maps. 2.2 Definitions The following definitions are commonly used in transportation studies including this Report: Control Point (CP): Control points are pre-determined locations along the corridor, which serve as data collection sites to indicate the start, intermediate, and end locations where the cumulative time of travel is documented. Delay (D): The elapsed time (in seconds) spent driving at a speed less than 10 mph. Travel Time and Delay Procedures 2-1

Travel Time: The time taken by a vehicle to traverse a given segment of street or highway. Running Time (RT): The time a vehicle is actually in motion (or moving faster than a pre-designated speed) while traversing a given segment of street or highway. Distance: The length of a link or the length of a corridor (in miles). Running Speed (RS): The test vehicle s average speed (in miles per hour) while the vehicle is in motion (does not include delay time), which can be calculated by the formula: RS = Dis tan ce TravelTime Delay Travel Speed: The distance traveled divided by the travel time. Space-Mean Speed: The segment distance divided by mean travel time over the segment of several vehicles, or of a single vehicle completing several trips. Operational Delay: The component of delay caused by the presence and interference of other traffic. This type of delay might be in the form of side friction, where other traffic interferes with the traffic stream (e.g., parking maneuvers) or in the form of internal friction, where the interference takes place within the traffic stream (e.g., encountering a reduction in capacity). Fixed Delay: It is the component of delay caused by traffic control devices which is independent of traffic volume and operational delay. Stopped Time Delay: It is the part of delay when the vehicle is not moving (or moving slower than a pre-designated speed). Travel Time Delay: It is the difference between actual travel time and travel time based on a vehicle traversing the study segment at an average speed equal to that for uncontested traffic flow on the segment. 2.3 Survey Methodology For this and previous Reports, the Average Speed Test Car method was utilized to conduct travel time and delay surveys. This method utilizes a test vehicle to traverse the Travel Time and Delay Procedures 2-2

corridors to measure or time the travel time and delay. The test vehicle contains a driver and a passenger to collect data. The test vehicle driver moves with the traffic flow utilizing the floating car technique. The floating car technique requires the driver to move with the flow of traffic, safely passing as many vehicles as pass the test vehicle. As mentioned in Section 1.4 of this Report, travel time and delay surveys or runs were conducted during the AM and PM peak hour traffic times. Surveys were conducted during Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday (excluding holidays) to avoid unusual traffic conditions. Travel time and delay is timed by a stopwatch and recorded by the test vehicle passenger. For travel time, the passenger records the stopwatch reading each time a control point is traversed. The amount of travel time required to reach each point is a reflection of traffic volume and congestion. To facilitate historical comparisons, the control points utilized within the corridors have remained essentially the same as in previous reports. Some intermediate control points have been added to corridors where appropriate. For travel delay, the test vehicle passenger records the amount of time, location, and cause of delay when the test vehicle slows to a speed of 10 MPH or less. 2.4 Analysis The average cumulative travel times were calculated for each corridor and plotted on graphs. These graphs also contain a depiction of the unimpeded travel time or the amount of travel time required for a vehicle to travel at the posted speed limit. Unimpeded travel times were computed by dividing the distance between control points by the posted speed limit of a corridor. The graphs were examined to identify locations where the actual travel time varied significantly from travel time at speed limit. For example, when the slope of a line depicting actual travel time was greater than the slope of a line depicting unimpeded travel time, the test vehicle was delayed. Conversely, if two graphs were parallel, the test vehicle was traveling at or near the speed limit. To provide additional information, the Travel Time and Delay Procedures 2-3

average cumulative travel time from the previous Report is also shown on the same graph. 2.5 Average Speeds Average speeds were calculated using the standard equation for rate of motion: Speed = Distance / Time The graphs illustrate the average speed between control points for the most current runs, the average speed between control points from the last survey, and speed limit. Average speed can be used to measure level of service (LOS) for the entire corridor as well as between control points. The average speed between control points can also help identify areas that may be experiencing traffic flow problems. Average speed from the previous Report is shown for historical comparison. 2.6 Delay at Specific Locations The delay data consists of duration (actual time the vehicle was moving at 10 MPH or less), location, direction of travel, and cause (signal, pedestrian, turning vehicle, etc.) of each delay encountered by the test vehicle. The total delay for the data collection dates was computed for each direction of travel and then used to calculate the average delay per test run. The average delay should give an indication of the amount of delay that can be expected when driving the route during the hours studied. The percentage of total delay by location was also computed for each corridor and test date. Travel Time and Delay Procedures 2-4

3.0 Travel Time and Delay Analysis 3.1 OH SR 618 or Washington Boulevard The OH SR 618 or Washington Boulevard Corridor was studied from OH SR 339 in Belpre, Ohio to the intersection of 4 th /Ann Streets just beyond the Parkersburg-Belpre Bridge in Parkersburg, WV. Ten control points were utilized along the 5.4 miles of the corridor: OH SR 339, the Kraton warning light, Farson Street, Middle Street, the Belpre Plaza shopping center, Lee Street, Stone Road, Maple Street, Main Street, and 4 th /Ann Streets (EB) or 5 th /Ann Streets (WB). These control points were utilized in previous studies and are illustrated in Figure 3-1. 3.1.1 Historical Travel Time and Delay Comparisons Table 3-1 is a comprehensive summary of travel time and delay data that has been collected from FY00 to FY10. As noted in the table travel time data was not available in FY05 and the data collected in FY07 was incomplete. Therefore, travel time and delay information for these two years was not utilized in the analysis of historic travel time and delay. Average travel times reached a peak in the EB AM, WB AM, and WB PM during FY04. Since this time, travel times have collectively reached their lowest with slight increases from FY08 to FY10. In relation to these changes, the average travel speeds have decreased, but shown some decline from FY08 to FY10. However, the average travel delay per run has increased over time from FY08 to FY10. In some instances, the increase was approximately 55 seconds. These results are displayed graphically in Figure 3-2 to Figure 3-4. Graphs depicting the travel times by control point over the past 5 years has been provided in Figure 3-5. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-1

Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre and Marietta Ohio River FIGURE 3-1 CONTROL POINTS ON THE OH STATE ROUTE 618 CORRIDOR # OH SR 339 # Warning Light # Farson St. # Middle St. # Shopping Center # Lee St. # # # Stone Rd. Maple St. Main St. 4th/Ann Sts. # # 5th/Ann Sts. Legend : # Control Points Travel Delay Corridor 0 0.5 1 Miles Prepared by : Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission 3-2

Table 3-1: Travel Time and Delay Summary for OH SR 618/Washington Boulevard Travel Date Number of Runs EB AM Runs Average Travel Average Travel Avg. Total Delay Time (seconds) Speed (mph) (sec) Oct-99 (FY00) 6 536.3 36.2 19.1 Jan-02 (FY02) 5 583.8 33.3 19.8 Apr-03 (FY03) 5 563.4 34.5 15.8 Sept-03 (FY04) 5 651.0 26.8 17.5 FY05 * - - - - Aug-05 (FY06) 5 599.4 36.6 17.7 Apr-07 (FY07) * - - - - Aug-07 (FY08) 6 561.0 33.6 15.8 July-08 (FY09) 6 571.8 32.9 16.7 Apr-10 (FY10) 5 587.0 32.0 16.7 WB AM Runs Oct-99 (FY00) 6 526.7 36.9 25.9 Jan-02 (FY02) 5 539.6 36.0 15.2 Apr-03 (FY03) 5 547.6 35.5 15.5 Sept-03 (FY04) 5 606.0 27.6 20.5 FY05 * - - - - Aug-05 (FY06) 5 490.2 31.8 15.3 Apr-07 (FY07) * - - - - Aug-07 (FY08) 6 507.0 35.6 15.5 July-08 (FY09) 6 510.0 35.5 13.9 Apr-10 (FY10) 5 530.0 37.0 22.9 EB PM Runs Oct-99 (FY00) 8 546.3 35.8 28.0 Jan-02 (FY02) 7 571.0 34.0 22.3 Apr-03 (FY03) 7 597.8 32.5 16.3 Sept-03 (FY04) 7 628.1 25.2 22.5 FY05 * - - - - Aug-05 (FY06) 7 580.0 25.2 14.0 Apr-07 (FY07) * - - - - Aug-07 (FY08) 8 559.8 35.2 16.3 July-08 (FY09) 7 543.0 34.4 14.8 Apr-10 (FY10) 7 589.0 35.5 18.9 WB PM Runs Oct-99 (FY00) 8 590.4 32.6 28.8 Jan-02 (FY02) 7 576.6 33.7 20.9 Apr-03 (FY03) 7 581.5 33.4 23.2 Sept-03 (FY04) 7 628.5 27.0 20.6 FY05 * - - - - Aug-05 (FY06) 7 567.6 23.3 15.2 Apr-07 (FY07) * - - - - Aug-07 (FY08) 8 552.0 33.2 23.2 July-08 (FY09) 8 553.8 32.6 17.7 Apr-10 (FY10) 7 578.0 32.6 19.7 *No data or incomplete data. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-3

Figure 3-2: Historic Summary of Average Travel Time on the OH SR 618 Corridor 660.0 640.0 620.0 Average Travel Time EB AM Runs WB AM Runs EB PM Runs WB PM Runs 600.0 Seconds 580.0 560.0 540.0 520.0 500.0 Oct-99 (FY00) Jan-02 (FY02) Apr-03 (FY03) Sept-03 (FY04) FY05 NONE Fiscal Year Aug-05 (FY06) Apr-07 (FY07) NONE Aug-07 (FY08) July-08 (FY09) Apr-10 (FY10) Figure 3-3: Historic Summary of Average Travel Speed on the OH SR 618 Corridor 38.0 Average Travel Speed 36.0 34.0 32.0 MPH 30.0 28.0 26.0 24.0 22.0 20.0 Oct-99 (FY00) Jan-02 (FY02) Apr-03 (FY03) Sept-03 (FY04) FY05 NONE Fiscal Year Aug-05 (FY06) Apr-07 (FY07) NONE Aug-07 (FY08) EB AM Runs WB AM Runs EB PM Runs WB PM Runs July-08 (FY09) Apr-10 (FY10) Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-4

Figure 3-4: Historic Summary of Average Total Delay Per Run on the OH SR 618 Corridor 35.0 30.0 Average Travel Delay Per Run EB AM Runs WB AM Runs EB PM Runs WB PM Runs 25.0 Seconds 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Oct-99 (FY00) Jan-02 (FY02) Apr-03 (FY03) Sept-03 (FY04) FY05 NONE Fiscal Year Aug-05 (FY06) Apr-07 (FY07) NONE Aug-07 (FY08) July-08 (FY09) Apr-10 (FY10) Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-5

10:48 9:36 8:24 Figure 3-5: 5-year Travel Time History on the OH 618 Corridor FY10 FY09 FY08 FY07 (NONE) FY06 5-year Travel Time History - EB AM 7:12 Time (minutes) 6:00 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 OH SR 339 Warning Light at Kraton Farson St. Middle St. Shopping Center Lee St. Stone Rd. Maple St. Main St. 5th/Ann Sts. Distance (miles) 10:48 9:36 8:24 FY10 FY09 FY08 FY07 (NONE) FY06 5-year Travel Time History - EB PM 7:12 Time (minutes) 6:00 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 OH SR 339 Warning Light at Kraton Farson St. Middle St. Shopping Center Distance (miles) Lee St. Stone Rd. Maple St. Main St. 5th/Ann Sts. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-6

9:36 8:24 FY10 FY09 FY08 5-year Travel Time History - WB AM 7:12 FY07 (NONE) FY06 Time (minutes) 6:00 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 5th/Ann Sts. Main St. Maple St. Stone Rd. Lee St. Shopping Center Distance (miles) Middle St. Farson St. Warning Light at Kraton OH SR 339 10:48 9:36 8:24 7:12 FY10 FY09 FY08 FY07 (NONE) FY06 5-year Travel Time History - WB PM Time (minutes) 6:00 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 5th/Ann Sts. Main St. Maple St. Stone Rd. Lee St. Shopping Center Distance (miles) Middle St. Farson St. Warning Light at Kraton OH SR 339 Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-7

3.1.2 Analysis of Travel Time Travel times are increasing over the unimpeded travel time in the EB direction during both the AM and PM surveys. As per Figure 3-6 and Figure 3-8, the section between the warning light at Kraton and Farson Street accounts for the increase. This increase is likely the result of the new traffic signal installed at the Farson Street intersection. The remainder of the survey results show travel time is relatively parallel to the unimpeded travel time. By the 5 th Street/Ann Street intersection is reached, the travel times are approximately one minute behind that of the unimpeded travel time. In the WB direction, the survey results show a slight decline in travel time when compared to the previous survey and the unimpeded travel time calculations. The WB PM survey shows the most decline by approximately 1.5 minutes. Figures 3-6 through 3-9 illustrate the cumulative average travel times for the Washington Boulevard Corridor. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-8

11.0 10.0 9.0 Figure 3-6: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time EB AM Travel Time EB AM Actual Travel Time Previous Survey Travel Time Unimpeded Travel Time 8.0 Time (minutes) 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 OH SR 339 (0.0) Warning Light at Kraton (1.2) Farson St. (2.5) Middle St. (3.0) Shopping Center (3.3) Lee St. (4.2) Stone Rd. (4.4) Maple St. (4.6) Main St. (4.9) 5th St. / Ann St. (5.4) 10.0 9.0 8.0 Distance (miles) Figure 3-7: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time WB AM Travel Times WB AM Actual Travel Time Previous Survey Travel Time Unimpeded Travel Time 7.0 Time (minutes) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 5th/Ann Sts (0.0) Main St. (0.5) Maple St. (0.8) Stone Rd (1.0) Lee St. (1.2) Shopping Cntr (2.1) Distance (miles) Middle St. (2.4) Farson St. (2.9) Warning Light (4.2) OH SR 339 (5.4) Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-9

Figure 3-8: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time EB PM 12.0 10.0 Actual Travel Time Previous Survey Travel Time Unimpeded Travel Time Travel Time EB PM 8.0 Time (minutes) 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 OH SR 339 (0.0) Warning Light at Kraton (1.2) Farson St. (2.5) Middle St. (3.0) Shopping Center (3.3) Lee St. (4.2) Stone Rd. (4.4) Maple St. (4.6) Main St. (4.9) 5th St. / Ann St. (5.4) Distance (miles) Figure 3-9: OH SR 618 Average Cumulative Travel Time WB PM 12.0 10.0 Actual Travel Time Previous Survey Travel Time Unimpeded Travel Time Travel Time WB PM 8.0 Time (minutes) 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 5th/Ann Sts (0.0) Main St. (0.5) Maple St. (0.8) Stone Rd (1.0) Lee St. (1.2) Shopping Cntr (2.1) Middle St. (2.4) Farson St. (2.9) Warning Light (4.2) OH SR 339 (5.4) Distance (miles) Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-10

3.1.3 Analysis of Travel Speed Graphical depictions of the average travel speeds for the EB and WB directions in the AM and PM peak hours can be found on Figures 3-10 through 3-13. Compared to the previous survey, travel speeds were lower in the EB AM and EB PM from OH 339 to Middle Street. From Middle Street to Lee Street, speeds were similar. In the WB AM and WB PM, there was a spike in travel speed from Main Street to Maple Street, where speeds slowed to Lee Street. Converse to the EB direction, speeds showed a spike around Lee Street. Speeds were again slightly above the posted speed limit from Middle Street to Farson Street. From Farson Street to the end of the survey, speeds remained below the posted speed limit. These speeds are correlative to the average travel time comparisons between the survey data and the unimpeded travel time calculations. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-11

60 55.4 Figure 3-10: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed EB AM Travel Speed EB AM 55.0 50 50.2 Speed (mph) 40 30 20 36.0 39.1 34.2 32.7 26.3 26.3 33.8 34.1 21.2 21.8 35.0 28.8 24.0 27.7 25.7 25.0 25.0 22.8 34.0 33.1 10 Avg. Speed Between Control Points Prev. Avg. Speed Between Control Points Speed Limit 0 OH SR 339 Warning Light Farson St. Middle St. Shopping Center Lee St. Stone Rd. Maple St. Main St. 5th/Ann Sts. Control Points Figure 3-11: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed WB AM Speed (mph) 60 50 40 30 20 28.1 25.4 25.0 41.5 38.6 30.0 21.8 Travel Speed WB AM 39.5 35.0 36.8 34.8 24.8 25.7 24.0 39.1 32.7 55.0 52.0 43.3 49.7 41.4 36.7 38.1 10 Avg. Speed Between Control Points Prev. Avg. Speed Between Control Points 0 5th/Ann Sts. Speed Limit Main St. Maple St. Stone Rd. Lee St. Shopping Center Middle St. Farson St. Warning Light OH SR 339 Control Points Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-12

60 50 54.7 55.4 Figure 3-12: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed EB PM Travel Speed EB PM 55.0 Speed (mph) 40 30 20 40.7 39.1 34.7 33.3 36.0 30.0 33.1 31.5 35.0 21.2 32.7 24.0 30.9 30.0 26.1 25.0 20.9 35.8 33.0 10 0 OH SR 339 Avg. Speed Between Control Points Prev. Avg. Speed Between Control Points Speed Limit Warning Light Farson St. Middle St. Shopping Center Control Points 15.7 Lee St. Stone Rd. Maple St. Main St. 5th/Ann Sts. 60 Figure 3-13: OH SR 618 Average Travel Speed WB PM Travel Speed WB PM 55.0 50 48.0 40 36.0 40.0 35.0 41.9 45.0 46.0 40.7 Speed (mph) 30 20 23.1 20.2 28.4 25.0 24.0 18.5 20.0 16.7 33.1 30.9 30.0 34.0 33.6 35.1 10 Avg. Speed Between Control Points Prev. Avg. Speed Between Control Points 0 5th/Ann Sts. Speed Limit Main St. Maple St. Stone Rd. Lee St. Shopping Center Middle St. Farson St. Warning Light OH SR 339 Control Points Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-13

3.1.4 Analysis of Travel Delay In the EB direction, the largest peak hour delay was attributed to Farson Street in the AM and the PM. The 4 th Street/Ann Street intersection was also prevalent in the PM followed by Lee Street. As mentioned previously, improvements to the Farson Street intersection are likely the cause of increased delay at the Farson Street intersection. In the WB direction, Main Street, Stone Road, Farson Street, and Lee Street are all locations with prevalent delay times. As seen in the Figures, the Main Street intersection accounts for the most delay along the corridor in both the AM and PM. Figures 3-14 through 3-17 depict the analysis results for average travel delay on the OH SR 618 Corridor. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-14

Shopping Center 10% Middle St. 15% Figure 3-14: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay EB AM Percentage of Total Delay by Location EB AM Stone Rd. 11% Misc. 0% 5th/Ann Sts. 9% Farson St. 31% 5th/Ann Sts. Farson St. Lee St. Main St. Maple St. Middle St. Shopping Center Stone Rd. Misc. Maple St. 4% Main St. 11% Lee St. 9% Figure 3-15: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay WB AM Middle St. 0% Percentage of Total Delay by Location WB AM Stone Rd. 20% Misc. 0% Farson St. 27% 5th/Ann Sts. Farson St. Lee St. Main St. Maple St. Middle St. Shopping Center Stone Rd. Misc. Shopping Center 0% Lee St. 6% Main St. 47% Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-15

Figure 3-16: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay EB PM Shopping Center 11% Middle St. 5% Maple St. 0% Main St. 13% Percentage of Total Delay by Location EB PM Stone Rd. 7% Misc. 0% 5th/Ann Sts. 27% 5th/Ann Sts. Farson St. Lee St. Main St. Maple St. Middle St. Shopping Center Stone Rd. Misc. Lee St. 18% Farson St. 28% Figure 3-17: OH SR 618 Percent Travel Delay WB PM Shopping Center 4% Middle St. 1% Stone Rd. 21% Percentage of Total Delay by Location WB PM 5th/Ann Sts. 0% Misc. 0% Farson St. 20% Lee St. 9% 5th/Ann Sts. Farson St. Lee St. Main St. Maple St. Middle St. Shopping Center Stone Rd. Misc. Maple St. 3% Main St. 42% Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 618 3-16

3.2 Ohio State Route 7 The OH SR 7 corridor is located in Marietta, Ohio and consists of 10 control points from Acme Street to the south Dimex Corporation entrance. The control points utilized are at Acme Street, the I-77 NB exit, Cogswell Lane, Capt D Seeley Drive, CR 344, TWP 345, CR 9, CR 20, Kardex, and the Dimex S entrance. The corridor extends from the north to south and is a total of 4.45 miles in length. The corridor is shown with its respective control points in Figure 3-18. This corridor was successfully studied last in April 2006 for the FY05-FY06 report. Data is not available for this corridor subsequent to that report as a consequence of staffing changes within WWW and construction activities on OH SR 7. Currently, OH SR 7 is being widened from two lanes to four lanes from the I-77 interchange through to Reno, Ohio. Therefore, a travel time and delay survey could not be conducted for the FY10 report. 3.2.1 Historical Travel Time and Delay Comparisons A summary of historic data from FY01 to FY06 has been prepared and presented in Table 3-2. A graphical depiction of this information has been provided in Figure 3-19 to Figure 3-21. Graphs depicting the travel times by control point over the past 5 years could not be provided for comparison purposes because only the FY 06 data is available. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 7 3-17

Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission Cogswell Ln. Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre and Marietta Acme St. I-77 NB Exit Captain Seely Dr. County Route 344 Township Route 345 FIGURE 3-18 CONTROL POINTS ALONG THE OH STATE ROUTE 7 CORRIDOR County Route 9 Legend : Control Points Travel Delay Corridor County Route 20 Ohio River Dimex South Entrance Kardex Employee Entrance 0 0.5 1 Miles Prepared by : Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission 3-18

Table 3-2: Travel Time and Delay Summary for the OH SR 7 Corridor Travel Date Number of Runs Average Travel Time (seconds) Average Travel Speed (mph) Avg. Total Delay (sec) NB AM Runs Aug-2001 (FY01) 8 385.2 41.6 13.0 Oct-2002 (FY03) 5 412.2 39.7 12.8 May-2005 (FY04) 6 405.5 38.6 9.6 Apr-2006 (FY06) 7 450.4 36.3 9.4 Mar-2007 (FY 07)* - - - - FY 08* - - - - May-2009 (FY 09)* - - - - May-2010 (FY 10)* - - - - SB AM Runs Aug-2001 (FY01) 8 376.2 42.6 12.2 Oct-2002 (FY03) 5 447.6 36.6 16.0 May-2005 (FY04) 6 390.2 34.6 14.5 Apr-2006 (FY06) 7 410.1 31.9 7.6 Mar-2007 (FY 07)* - - - - FY 08* - - - - May-2009 (FY 09)* - - - - May-2010 (FY 10)* - - - - NB PM Runs Aug-2001 (FY01) 11 416.4 38.5 18.7 Oct-2002 (FY03) 7 486.6 33.7 18.8 May-2005 (FY04) 9 450.5 38.1 17.6 Apr-2006 (FY06) 8 573.3 33.6 42.6 Mar-2007 (FY 07)* - - - - FY 08* - - - - May-2009 (FY 09)* - - - - May-2010 (FY 10)* - - - - SB PM Runs Aug-2001 (FY01) 10 441.2 36.2 19.7 Oct-2002 (FY03) 7 492.0 33.3 26.3 May-2005 (FY04) 9 468.4 33.8 15.3 Apr-2006 (FY06) 8 491.3 33.0 14.5 Mar-2007 (FY 07)* - - - - FY 08* - - - - May-2009 (FY 09)* - - - - May-2010 (FY 10)* - - - - * No Data or Incomplete Data Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 7 3-19

Figure 3-19: Historic Summary of Average Travel Time on the OH SR 7 Corridor 700.0 Average Travel Time 600.0 500.0 NB AM Runs SB AM Runs NB PM Runs SB PM Runs Seconds 400.0 300.0 200.0 100.0 0.0 Aug-2001 (FY01) Oct-2002 (FY03) May-2005 (FY04) Apr-2006 (FY06) Fiscal Year Figure 3-20: Historic Summary of Average Travel Speed on the OH SR 7 Corridor 45.0 Average Travel Speed 40.0 35.0 30.0 MPH 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 NB AM Runs SB AM Runs 5.0 NB PM Runs SB PM Runs 0.0 Aug-2001 (FY01) Oct-2002 (FY03) May-2005 (FY04) Apr-2006 (FY06) Fiscal Year Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 7 3-20

Figure 3-21: Historic Summary of Average Total Delay Per Run on the OH SR 7 Corridor 45.0 Average Travel Delay Per Run 40.0 35.0 NB AM Runs SB AM Runs NB PM Runs SB PM Runs 30.0 Seconds 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Aug-2001 (FY01) Oct-2002 (FY03) May-2005 (FY04) Apr-2006 (FY06) Fiscal Year Travel time, speed, and delay data analysis could not be provided for the current fiscal year, due to insufficient data. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 7 3-21

3.3 Ohio State Route 60 The OH SR 60 corridor is located in Marietta, Ohio and consists of 12 control points along its 3.25 mile length. The corridor extends from Wayne Street (in the south) to Colegate Drive (in the north) along OH SR 60. The control points utilized include Wayne Street, 7 th Street/Pike Street/Green Street, the Williamstown Bridge intersection, 4 th Street, 3 rd Street, Butler Street, Putnam Street, Scammel Street, Washington Street, Marion Street, Davis Drive, and Colegate Drive. These intersections were also utilized in the previous Reports and are labeled on Figure 3-22. This corridor was successfully studied last in October 2008 for the FY09 report. Data is not available for this corridor for this report due to ongoing construction along the corridor. Currently, OH SR 60 is undergoing improvements near Julian Avenue and just prior to Colegate Drive. Therefore, a travel time and delay survey could not be conducted for the FY10 report. 3.3.1 Historical Travel Time and Delay Comparisons A comprehensive summary of the travel time and delay data that was collected from FY00 to FY09 can be found in Table 3-3. Travel time and delay was not collected in FY08 due to transitions in WWW staffing. A graphical representation of the historic data contained in Table 3-3 can be found in Figure 3-23, Figure 3-24, and Figure 3-25. Graphs depicting the travel times by control point over the past 5 years has been provided in Figure 3-26. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 60 3-22

Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission Colgate Dr. Davis Ave. # # Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre and Marietta FIGURE 3-22 77 CONTROL POINTS ON THE OH SR 60 CORRIDOR Marion St. # Legend : # Control Points Travel Delay Corridor Washington St. # Scammel St. # Putnam St. # Butler St. # # # Greene St. 4th St. # WIlliamstown Bridge 7th St. # # Wayne St. 0 0.5 1 Miles Prepared by : Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission 3-23

Table 3-3: Travel Time and Delay Summary for the OH SR 60 Corridor Travel Date Number of Runs Average Travel Time (seconds) NB AM Runs Average Travel Speed (mph) Avg. Total Delay (sec) Mar-2003 (FY03) 4 546.0 21.4 27.1 Sept-2003 (FY04) 5 529.6 18.9 19.8 Sept-2005 (FY06) 5 478.6 21.2 11.7 Nov-2006 (FY 07) 5 474.0 23.9 14.8 FY 08* - - - - Oct-2008 (FY 09) 5 528.0 21.1 23.0 Oct-2009 (FY 10)* - - - - SB AM Runs Mar-2003 (FY03) 4 530.7 22.0 21.4 Sept-2003 (FY04) 5 522.1 18.6 30.3 Sept-2005 (FY06) 5 517.8 19.8 19.9 Nov-2006 (FY 07) 5 528.0 21.4 19.9 FY 08* - - - - Oct-2008 (FY 09) 5 525.0 22.1 23.0 Oct-2009 (FY 10)* - - - - NB PM Runs Mar-2003 (FY03) 6 688.0 17.0 32.0 Sept-2003 (FY04) 6 536.1 18.6 28.2 Sept-2005 (FY06) 6 589.2 17.1 18.2 Nov-2006 (FY 07) 6 508.0 18.7 23.5 FY 08* - - - - Oct-2008 (FY 09) 6 582.0 20.4 26.0 Oct-2009 (FY 10)* - - - - SB PM Runs Mar-2003 (FY03) 6 674.5 17.3 40.2 Sept-2003 (FY04) 6 609.4 17.1 24.0 Sept-2005 (FY06) 6 627.6 17.1 23.0 Nov-2006 (FY 07) 6 533.0 20.9 14.2 FY 08* - - - - Oct-2008 (FY 09) 6 575.0 19.9 26.0 Oct-2009 (FY 10)* - - - - * No Data of Incomplete Data Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 60 3-24

Figure 3-23: Historic Summary of Average Travel Time on the OH SR 60 Corridor 800.0 Average Travel Time 700.0 600.0 500.0 Seconds 400.0 300.0 200.0 100.0 NB AM Runs SB AM Runs NB PM Runs SB PM Runs 0.0 May-2003 (FY03) Sept-2003 (FY04) Sept-2005 (FY06) Nov-2006 (FY 07) Oct-2008 (FY 09) Fiscal Year Figure 3-24: Historic Summary of Average Travel Speed on the OH SR 60 Corridor Average Travel Speed 30.0 25.0 20.0 MPH 15.0 10.0 NB AM Runs 5.0 SB AM Runs NB PM Runs SB PM Runs 0.0 May-2003 (FY03) Sept-2003 (FY04) Sept-2005 (FY06) Nov-2006 (FY 07) Oct-2008 (FY 09) Fiscal Year Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 60 3-25

Figure 3-25: Historic Summary of Average Total Delay Per Run on the OH SR 60 Corridor 45.0 40.0 35.0 NB AM Runs SB AM Runs NB PM Runs SB PM Runs Average Travel Delay Per Run 30.0 Seconds 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 May-2003 (FY03) Sept-2003 (FY04) Sept-2005 (FY06) Nov-2006 (FY 07) Oct-2008 (FY 09) Fiscal Year Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 60 3-26

9:36 8:24 7:12 Figure 3-26: 5-year Travel Time History on the OH SR 60 Corridor FY10 (NONE) FY09 FY08 (NONE) FY07 FY06 5-year Travel Time History - NB AM 6:00 Time (minutes) 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 Wayne St. 7th St./Pike St./Greene St. Williamstown Bridge 4th St. 3rd St. Butler St. Distance (miles) Putnam St. Scammel St. Washington St. Marion St. Davis Dr. Colegate Dr. 10:48 9:36 8:24 FY10 (NONE) FY09 FY08 (NONE) FY07 FY06 5-year Travel Time History - NB PM 7:12 Time (minutes) 6:00 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 Wayne St. 7th St./Pike St./Greene St. Williamstown Bridge 4th St. 3rd St. Butler St. Putnam St. Distance (miles) Scammel St. Washington St. Marion St. Davis Dr. Colegate Dr. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 60 3-27

9:36 8:24 7:12 6:00 FY10 (NONE) FY09 FY08 (NONE) FY07 FY06 5-year Travel Time History - SB AM 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 Colegate Dr. Davis Dr. Marion St. Time (minutes) Washington St. Scammel St. Putnam St. Butler St. Greene St. 4th St. Williamstown Bridge 7th St./Greene St./Pike St. Wayne St. Distance (miles) 12:00 10:48 9:36 8:24 FY10 (NONE) FY09 FY08 (NONE) FY07 FY06 5-year Travel Time History - SB PM Time (minutes) 7:12 6:00 4:48 3:36 2:24 1:12 0:00 Colegate Dr. Davis Dr. Marion St. Washington St. Scammel St. Putnam St. Distance (miles) Butler St. Greene St. 4th St. Williamstown Bridge 7th St./Greene St./Pike St. Wayne St. Travel Time and Delay Analysis OH SR 60 3-28