U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Similar documents
EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

Special Public Notice

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

United States Multi-Hazard Early Warning System

Lake Winnebago Regulation Meeting

Integrating Weather Forecasts into Folsom Reservoir Operations

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Inter State Large Navigable Rivers of the United States

Great Lakes Update. Background

Great Lakes Update. Great Lakes Winter and Spring Summary January June Vol. 187 Great Lakes Update August 2012

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

MEDIA RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 17, 2014 Preparing for the Spring Thaw

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e


Lower Snake River Programmatic Sediment Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

Red River Levee Panel

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Local Flood Hazards. Click here for Real-time River Information

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION

Great Lakes Update. Volume 194: 2015 Annual Summary

Flood Scenario Worksheet

WATER CONTROL MANUAL MISSISSIPPI RIVER NINE FOOT CHANNEL NAVIGATION PROJECT

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

January 25, Summary

GRAPEVINE LAKE MODELING & WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Appendix A Zoning Ordinance

Souris River Basin Spring Runoff Outlook As of March 15, 2018

Great Lakes Update. Volume 188: 2012 Annual Summary

Floods Lecture #21 20

2012 USACE Drought Actions

Summary of the 2017 Spring Flood

Progress Report. Flood Hazard Mapping in Thailand

INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION. of Rainy Lake and of other Boundary Waters in the. Rainy Lake Watershed. CONSOLIDATION. of the

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Great Lakes Update. Volume 199: 2017 Annual Summary. Background

Section 5. Low-Gradient Streams. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

CASE STUDY NATHPA JHAKRI, INDIA

Analysis of Hydraulic Impacts on the Schuylkill River

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Low Low Water in Puget Sound vs. Mean Sea Level. What do the flood event gauge readings at Sedro Woolley really mean?

GTU. Shantilal Shah Engineering College, Bhavnagar

Technical Review of Pak Beng Hydropower Project (1) Hydrology & Hydraulics and (2) Sediment Transport & River Morphology

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Water Level Analysis of Lower St. Marys River September 15, 2010

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Real-Time Flood Forecasting Modeling in Nashville, TN utilizing HEC-RTS

Souris River Basin Spring Runoff Outlook As of March 1, 2019

NOAA Spring Flood Outlook for Iowa

LAKE WINNEBAGO REGULATION MEETING. USACE Detroit District 16 October 2017

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

NOAA s National Weather Service. National Weather Service

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

MISSOURI RIVER BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT SPRING 2019 PUBLIC MEETINGS

Assessment of the Hood River Delta Hood River, Oregon

Limited Visual Dam Safety Inspections OA Oahu Reservoir No Oahu, Hawaii

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

6.1 Water. The Water Cycle

National Weather Service. Harold H. Opitz Hydrologist in Charge

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, New Hampshire

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

Analysis of the Effects of Bendway Weir Construction on Channel Cross Sectional Geometry

The U.S. National Integrated Drought Information System. Roger S. Pulwarty National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration USA

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Delaware River Flood Advisory Committee

Background on the March 13-14, 2007 Flooding in Browns Valley (Traverse County), Minnesota

Great Lakes Update. Volume 191: 2014 January through June Summary. Vol. 191 Great Lakes Update August 2014

CASE STUDY NATHPA JHAKRI, INDIA

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

IN VEHICLES: Do not try to outrun a tornado. Abandon your vehicle and hide in a nearby ditch or depression and cover your head.

Proposal to limit Namakan Lake to 1970 Upper Rule Curve for remainder of summer

Information for File # MMJ; Trunk Highway (TH) 7 / Louisiana Ave. Interchange Project

Ice Phenomena on the Lower Vistula

Mississippi River and Tributaries Project Mississippi River Geomorphology and Potamology Program

Climates of NYS. Definitions. Climate Regions of NYS. Storm Tracks. Climate Controls 10/13/2011. Characteristics of NYS s Climates

COASTAL HAZARDS. Alan Lulloff, Water Management Engineer Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Local Contact: John Spangberg (715)

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

Presentation for the Institute of International & European Affairs

EFFICIENCY OF THE INTEGRATED RESERVOIR OPERATION FOR FLOOD CONTROL IN THE UPPER TONE RIVER OF JAPAN CONSIDERING SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RAINFALL

Thinking Outside the Box (Culvert) Making difficult decisions for Fish Passage. Dave Stewart Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

NEWS RELEASE UNDER SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (33 USC 1344) ACTION NUMBER SPA ABQ

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Transcription:

CORPS FACTS Regulating Mississippi River Navigation Pools U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG Historical Background Federal improvements in the interest of navigation on the Mississippi River began as early as 1824. In 1878, the U.S. Congress authorized the first comprehensive project on the upper river: a 4 1/2-foot channel. This was followed by authorizations for a 6-foot channel in 1907 and a 9-foot channel in 1928, the depth that is being maintained at the present time. To achieve a 9-foot channel in the Upper Mississippi River, the construction of a system of navigation locks and dams was authorized in 1930 and expanded in 1932, 1935, 1937, 1945 and 1958. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District has jurisdiction over the 13 uppermost structures -- No. 10 at Guttenberg, Iowa, to Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam in Minneapolis. These locks and dams, supplemented by dredging, maintain the 9-foot depth during the navigation season. The Navigation Pools The dams create slack-water pools for navigation during periods of low and medium flows. The locks allow river traffic to move from one pool to another like a stairway of water. The Slack-Water Pool System The average person may think of a dam as a huge solid structure used to block the flow in a river and form a lake. This is not true of navigation dams, like those on the upper Mississippi. These dams are not solid but are a series of concrete piers across the river with movable gates between the piers. A dam is formed when the gates are lowered, causing the water level upstream of the dam to rise and form a slack-water pool deep enough for navigation. 1 Open River In order to operate the slack-water pool system, it was necessary for the federal government to acquire interest in all real estate that would be subject to flooding caused by the use of the dams. Much of this land is now serving the public for recreational purposes and as wildlife refuges. Some land is owned outright and some is covered by "flowage easements" allowing artificial flooding of privately-owned land, if necessary. At times, the natural flow of the river provides a channel deep enough for navigation without the use of the dams. This usually occurs following the spring snow melt across the basin. When this occurs, the gates between the piers are raised completely out of the water so that the river flows free, just like an open river. Many people believe that the navigation pools should be drawn down before periods of high water are expected to provide storage

capacity for the incoming flow of water. However, this drawdown cannot be performed for both physical and legal reasons. The physical reason is that the pools do not contain sufficient storage capacity to accommodate flooding events. Even if each pool was completely emptied prior to an anticipated heavy runoff period, it would take only a matter of hours to refill them and this would not appreciably lower the peak river stages reached by the flood. This is because the amount of storage that could be made available by pool drawdowns is so very small in comparison with flood volumes. The legal reason for not drawing down pools is the "Anti- Drawdown Law." This act of Congress, dated March 10, 1934, is entitled, "An act to promote the conservation of wildlife, fish, and game, and for other purposes," as amended by Public Law 732 on Aug. 14, 1946, and again by Public Law 697 on June 19, 1948. The "Anti-drawdown Law" directs that in the management of facilities (including locks, dams and pools) on the Mississippi River between Rock Island, Ill., and Minneapolis administered by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, full consideration and recognition is to be given to the needs of fish and other wildlife resources, including habitat. To the maximum extent possible, the law directs that the Corps regulation of the navigation pools take the needs of these natural resources into account, while maintaining navigation, without causing damage to property, and without creating additional liability to the government. The law also directs that the Corps shall generally operate and maintain pool levels as though navigation were carried on throughout the year. Dam Operations Each dam is operated to accommodate river flow conditions. In normal operation, all gates are partially open, to allow water to flow through. As the river flow increases or decreases, the gate openings are increased or decreased accordingly. If there were no flow in a pool contained by an upper and lower dam, the water surface of the pool would be level throughout its entire length. However, if there is flow through the pool, there must be a slope to the water surface; the upstream end of the pool will rise as the discharge of the upper dam increases, and the downstream end of the pool will fall as the discharge of the lower dam increases, resulting in a drawdown at the lower dam. The water surface profile of the pool will tend to pivot about a point somewhere between the two dams. The pivot point is called the "primary control point," and its location is found to be at or near the point of intersection of the "project pool" elevation and the "ordinary high water profile." Court decisions have define ordinary high water profile as follows: "where the banks of a body of water are relatively steep, ordinary high water mark is coordinate with the limit of the bed of the water; and that, only, is to be considered the bed which the water occupies sufficiently long and continuously to wrest it from vegetation and destroy its value for agricultural purposes." 2 When the banks are low and flat, ordinary high water mark is to be considered "the point up to which the presence and action of the water is so continuous as to destroy the value of the land for agricultural purposes by preventing the growth of vegetation, constituting what may be termed any ordinary agricultural crop." On navigable lakes and rivers the Government of the United States holds an easement to sue the riparian lands up to ordinary high water mark, in the public interest.

The primary purpose of the dams in the St. Paul District is to maintain a minimum channel depth of nine feet for navigation, and to accomplish this purpose, project pool elevations must be maintained at the primary control points. The operation of the dams is required at low and moderate flows in the Mississippi River, but the dams are not needed during high flows, and the movable dams must be removed from the water before flood stages are reached. Except for the water that goes into valley storage as the inflows increase, all inflow must be discharged. BASIC PLAN OF OPERATION In each pool, field surveys have established the ordinary high water profile, and the location of the primary control point has been determined. Project pool elevation is maintained at the primary control point, and the pool elevation at the dam is allowed to fall as the discharge is increased. However, the drawdown at the dam must be limited so that navigation and conservation interests in the area, from the primary control point to the dam, will not be damaged by extremely low water. The maximum allowable drawdown varies from 0 to 1 foot in the various pools, depending on local conditions. By using this method of operation, the inundated area for many smaller flood events is reduced, thereby greatly reducing the cost to the Government of acquiring flowage rights. 3 When the maximum allowable drawdown has been reached at the dam, control of the pool is shifted from the primary control point to the dam, and the pool is then said to be in secondary control. If, while the pool is in secondary control, the inflow continues to increase, the maximum allowable drawdown is maintained at the dam by increasing the discharge, and the stage at the primary control point and at all other points in the pool is allowed to rise. As the discharge is increased, the head at the dam will be decreased; and when the head has been reduced to less than one foot, the gates shall be raised out of the water, and open river flow will be in effect.

When the river has been in open river flow condition and the pool elevation at the dam falls to the secondary control elevation, the gates are returned to operation and secondary control elevation is maintained at the dam until the stage at the primary control point has fallen to project pool elevation. Then, control of the pool is returned to the primary control point, and project pool elevation is again maintained at the primary control point. This plan of operation, combined with the natural variation of flows, results in fluctuations of pool levels, which may at times cause some adverse effects. However, compensation has been paid to those affected by project operations, as authorized by Congress. Consistent with the basic purpose of the navigation project, which was authorized for and designed to make safe navigation of the Upper Mississippi River possible, every effort is made to cooperate with other activities, such as small-boat docks and harbors, farming, trapping, fishing, and other pursuits within the area of the pools. This method of operation is used for all the navigation pools in the St. Paul District with the exception of: Upper St. Anthony Pool and Pool No. 1, which are controlled by hydropower interests; Lower St. Anthony Pool, which is too small to require this type of operation; and Pool No. 7, where all control is at the dam. Lock 10 is also a special case, since it was originally in the Rock Island District, and it has an operation plan developed by that district. River Stages The Corps of Engineers furnishes data on river stages and flows to the National Weather Service (NWS) forecast office in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which has the sole responsibility for issuing public warnings, watches, and statements on current river levels, as well as forecasts of expected flood crests. Daily river stages and flood forecasts are disseminated through the local media as well as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather radio and weather wire. The NOAA weather wire is used by many local civil defense and police agencies. The flood forecasts issued by the National Weather Service are referenced to elevation in feet above mean sea level (m.s.l.) or to stage, which is measured as the height in feet of the river level above an arbitrary reference point known as the gage datum. If the elevation of the gage datum (zero of the gage) is known, forecasts referenced to stage may be converted to elevation by simply adding the datum elevation to the stage reading. Forecasts of stage or river elevations are not useful unless referenced to a known river level. The normal reference used for this purpose is the NWS flood stage at each location or the project pool elevation for each lock and dam pool. With these known reference points, river interests can use the current and forecasted river stages to determine how the forecasted river level relates to local topography. Navigators who use the river commercially are familiar with these reference points and their relationship to a given river level. For safety reasons, those who use the river for pleasure or other purposes should become familiar with these reference points and the river levels which results in the most favorable depths and conditions for the particular activity in which they are engaged. Those interested in navigating a particular portion of the river should check river levels in that area. 4

To obtain further information about pool regulation you may contact the St. Paul District Water Control Center at 651-290-5624. 5