Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Homework 6

Similar documents
Chapter 2: One-dimensional Steady State Conduction

Zero-Free Region for ζ(s) and PNT

Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications

Some Useful Results for Spherical and General Displacements

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 19 Apr 2009

F = F x x + F y. y + F z

A Characterization of Wavelet Convergence in Sobolev Spaces

Implementing the Law of Sines to solve SAS triangles

The numbers inside a matrix are called the elements or entries of the matrix.

MA2331 Tutorial Sheet 5, Solutions December 2014 (Due 12 December 2014 in class) F = xyi+ 1 2 x2 j+k = φ (1)

CHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. 1.1 The definition of a differentiable manifold

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 3

Strauss PDEs 2e: Section Exercise 3 Page 1 of 13. u tt c 2 u xx = cos x. ( 2 t c 2 2 x)u = cos x. v = ( t c x )u

Asymptotic behavior of solutions to wave equations with a memory condition at the boundary

McCreight s Suffix Tree Construction Algorithm. Milko Izamski B.Sc. Informatics Instructor: Barbara König

Table of Common Derivatives By David Abraham

F / x everywhere in some domain containing R. Then, + ). (10.4.1)

2. Properties of Functions

LECTURE NOTES FOR , FALL 2004

Computing 2-Walks in Cubic Time

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 27 Mar 2019

Implicit Differentiation

On the Reverse Problem of Fechnerian Scaling

18.06 Problem Set 4 Due Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. in 2-106

Darboux s theorem and symplectic geometry

LECTURE 22: MAPPING DEGREE, POINCARE DUALITY

CMSC 451: Lecture 9 Greedy Approximation: Set Cover Thursday, Sep 28, 2017

Expressiveness of the Interval Logics of Allen s Relations on the Class of all Linear Orders: Complete Classification

Sensitivity Analysis of Resonant Circuits


18 Numerical Integration of Functions

GLOBAL EDITION. Calculus. Briggs Cochran Gillett SECOND EDITION. William Briggs Lyle Cochran Bernard Gillett

New Equation of Motion of an Electron: the Covariance of Self-action

231 Outline Solutions Tutorial Sheet 7, 8 and January Which of the following vector fields are conservative?

Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing

Packing Plane Spanning Trees into a Point Set

CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM

CSE 5311 Notes 18: NP-Completeness

Tensors, Fields Pt. 1 and the Lie Bracket Pt. 1

PDE Notes, Lecture #11

Aharonov-Bohm effect. Dan Solomon.

Green s function for the wave equation

Where as discussed previously we interpret solutions to this partial differential equation in the weak sense: b

Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics AA215A Lecture 4

for all x in [a,b], then the area of the region bounded by the graphs of f and g and the vertical lines x = a and x = b is b [ ( ) ( )] A= f x g x dx

Lectures - Week 10 Introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations (ODES) First Order Linear ODEs

Euler Equations: derivation, basic invariants and formulae

Hankel Optimal Model Order Reduction 1

Master Thesis. Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung. Asymptotic stability of soliton to the gkdv equation.

Chapter 6. Compression Reinforcement - Flexural Members

Constraint-free Analog Placement with Topological Symmetry Structure

MATH Non-Euclidean Geometry Exercise Set #8 Solutions

Supplementary Materials for A universal data based method for reconstructing complex networks with binary-state dynamics

Schrödinger s equation.

the following action R of T on T n+1 : for each θ T, R θ : T n+1 T n+1 is defined by stated, we assume that all the curves in this paper are defined

Chapter 2: Solution of First order ODE

SQUARE ROOTS AND AND DIRECTIONS

Viewing the Rings of a Tree: Minimum Distortion Embeddings into Trees

The homopolar generator: an analytical example

Determination the Invert Level of a Stilling Basin to Control Hydraulic Jump

Physics 523, General Relativity Homework 4 Due Wednesday, 25 th October 2006

Nelson Pinto-Neto 331 funtion is given in terms of the pointer basis states, an why we o not see superpositions of marosopi objets. In this way, lassi

2. The Energy Principle in Open Channel Flows

WHAT DOES THE CLASSIFYING SPACE OF A CATEGORY CLASSIFY? Introduction. Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol. 7(1), 2005, pp MICHAEL WEISS

Econ 455 Answers - Problem Set Consider a small country (Belgium) with the following demand and supply curves for corn:

Math Implicit Differentiation. We have discovered (and proved) formulas for finding derivatives of functions like

Multi-scale Godunov-type method for cell-centered discrete Lagrangian hydrodynamics.

A Variational Definition for Limit and Derivative

Labeling Workflow Views with Fine-Grained Dependencies

Relative Maxima and Minima sections 4.3

Strauss PDEs 2e: Section Exercise 1 Page 1 of 6

Most results in this section are stated without proof.

Quasi-Monte Carlo Algorithms for unbounded, weighted integration problems

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 30 Jan 2019

Remark 4.1 Unlike Lyapunov theorems, LaSalle s theorem does not require the function V ( x ) to be positive definite.

The Computational Complexity of the Unrooted Subtree Prune and Regraft Distance. Technical Report CS

A MATLAB Method of Lines Template for Evolution Equations

He s Semi-Inverse Method and Ansatz Approach to look for Topological and Non-Topological Solutions Generalized Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

Hidden Momentum in a Spinning Sphere

Differential Equations 8/24/2010

Some facts you should know that would be convenient when evaluating a limit:

Complexity of Regularization RBF Networks

Math Chapter 2 Essentials of Calculus by James Stewart Prepared by Jason Gaddis

Fast Evaluation of Canonical Oscillatory Integrals

τ = 10 seconds . In a non-relativistic N 1 = N The muon survival is given by the law of radioactive decay N(t)=N exp /.

Mid-Term Examination - Spring 2014 Mathematical Programming with Applications to Economics Total Score: 45; Time: 3 hours

SOME PROPERTIES OF LOCALLY CONFORMAL SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

Counting Idempotent Relations

Linear Capacity Scaling in Wireless Networks: Beyond Physical Limits?

Relativistic Dynamics

THE DIVERGENCE. 1. Interpretation of the divergence 1 2. The divergence theorem Gauss law 6

Brazilian Journal of Physics ISSN: Sociedade Brasileira de Física Brasil

Time Domain Method of Moments

Methods of evaluating tests

CS 491G Combinatorial Optimization Lecture Notes

Nonreversibility of Multiple Unicast Networks

The derivative of a function f(x) is another function, defined in terms of a limiting expression: f(x + δx) f(x)

= ν L. C ν L. = ν R. P ν L. CP ν L. CP Violation. Standard Model contains only left-handed neutrinos and right-handed anti-neutrinos

LECTURE 1: BASIC CONCEPTS, PROBLEMS, AND EXAMPLES

10.2 The Occurrence of Critical Flow; Controls

Transcription:

ath 225B: Differential Geometry, Homework 6 Ian Coley February 13, 214 Problem 8.7. Let ω be a 1-form on a manifol. Suppose that ω = for every lose urve in. Show that ω is exat. We laim that this onition is equivalent to the following: if : [, 1] is any urve, then ω epens only on ) an 1), that is, the integral of ω is path inepenent. We will show only the forwar iretion, whih we require. Suppose that, are two paths suh that ) = ) an 1) = 1). Then the omposition is a lose path at ), where t) = 1 t). Hene ω =. But we also have ω = ω ω = = ω = Therefore without loss of generality assume that is onnete, sine the following proof may be repeate for any number of onnete omponents. Then fix p an let, efine a funtion f : R by fx) = ω where γ is a path from p to x. Sine ω is path inepenent, this makes sense for any γ. Further, onsier the funtion gx) onstrute as above with basepoint q an path δ an γ from that q to p. Then we have gx) = ω = ω + ω = C + fx), δ γ γ where C is a onstant. Therefore every hoie of basepoint yiels the same funtion up to positive onstant epening on basepoint. We laim that f = ω. To see this, we will show they take the same value on any vetor fiel X at any p. Let p. Then onsier a urve through p so that ) = p an fx) p = X p f) = t ft)) t=, γ ω. 1

whih is always possible by results in previous setions. We parametrise the path between ) an t) the path t s) by t s) = st). Then This ompletes the proof. fx) = t ft)) t= = ω = t t t= t = 1 ) ω t s)) s t s t= = 1 ) ωst)) t st) s t s s = t ) ωu)) u u t t u t= ) = ωt)) t t t t= ) = ω)) = ωp)x p ). t t= 1 t ω Problem 8.8. A manifol is alle simply onnete if is onnete an if every smooth map f : S 1 is smoothly ontratible to a point. a) If is smoothly ontratible to a point, then is simply onnete. b) S 1 is not simply onnete. ) S n is simply onnete for n > 1. ) If is simply onnete an p, then any smooth map f : S 1 is smoothly ontratible to p. e) If = U V, where U an V are simply onnete open subsets with U V simply onnete, then is simply onnete. f) If is simply onnete, then H 1 ) =. a) Let p : be the smooth ontration of to a point, i.e. there is a homotopy H t : so that H = i an H 1 = {p}. Then let f : S 1 be any map. Then the omposition f H t = F t : I S 1 is a smooth homotopy with F = f an F 1 = {p}. Therefore f is smoothly ontratible to a point, so is simply onnete. b) If S 1 were simply onnete, then every map f : S 1 S 1 woul be homotopi to a onstant map. In partiular, the ientity map woul be homotopi to a onstant map, so S 1 woul be ontratible. But S 1 is a ompat manifol of positive imension, so it is not ontratible. Therefore S 1 is not simply onnete. t= 2

) Let f : S 1 S k be a map. We woul like to show that this is homotopi to a onstant. Taking the hint, Sar s theorem allows us to hoose p S k \ fs 1 ) when k > 1. Reall that we showe in 1.1.13 that S k \{p} is iffeomorphi to R k for k 1. Further, R k is ontratible, so it is simply onnete. Therefore fs 1 ) is iffeomorphi to a loop in R k, whih is homotopi to a onstant. Therefore this homotopy an be pulle bak along the iffeomorphism so fs 1 ) is simply onnete in S k \ {p}, hene in S k as well. This ompletes the proof. ) Sine is path onnete an embeable into Euliean spae, it is in partiular path onnete via loal harts. Therefore suppose that f : S 1 ontrats to a point q. Then there is a path γ : [, 1] so that γ) = q an γ1) = p. Therefore if H t is the homotopy between f an the point {q}, we have a homotopy F t : given by fx) t = H 2t x) < t < 1/2 F t x) = q t = 1/2. γ2t 1) 1/2 < t < 1 p t = 1 Hene f is ontratible to an arbitrary point p. e) Let f : S 1 be a smooth map. Firstly, if the image of f lans in either U or V alone, then f is ontratible to a point, so we are one. Therefore suppose that the image of f lans in both U an V, an that the image of f is not ontaine in U V. Let us parametrise S 1 by [, 1] for simpliity. Then we may break up [, 1] into isjoint segments X i = [a i, b i ] so that fx i ) U or V. From here, we may onnet the points fa i ) an fb i ) in U V by a path γ i to reate a loop in a simply onnete subset either U or V ). Therefore there is a homotopy of this loop to the loop onsisting of γ i on [, 1/2] an γ 1 i on [1/2, 1]. Deleting the bakwars iretion, we have taken the setion fx i ) of our loop an smoothly ontate it to lie ompletely in U V. Repeat this proess a finite number of times, so that the image of f lies ompletely in U V. Thus we are reue to the first ase, so we are one. f) We verify this via the integral. Assume that ω is a lose 1-form. Note that every lose loop in is the image of S 1 in uner some map f. By assumption, f is homotopi to a onstant map p, so by Theorem 8.13 their pullbaks are also equal. Therefore for a 1-form ω, ω = f ω = p ω = ω = S 1 S 1 {p} This hols for every lose urve. Therefore by Problem 8.7, ω is exat. Therefore H 1 ) = sine every 1-form is exat. 3

Problem 8.12. a) Let be {x, y) R 2 : x, y) < 1} together with a proper portion of its bounary, an let ω = x y. Show that ω ω, even though both sies make sense. b) Similarly, fin an example to Stokes Theorem when =, 1) an ω is a -form whose support is not ompat. ) Examine a partition of unity for, 1) by funtions with ompat support to see just why the proof of Stokes Theorem breaks own in this ase. a) Let us examine D, the unit is in R 2. We may apply Stokes Theorem to this manifol: ω = ω. S 1 D Now let : [, 1] S 1 be an appropriately-oriente parametrisation of S 1. Then 1 ω = ω. D Now uner the assumption that we have only a proper portion of the bounary of the unit isk, we take α < 1 so that we have [, α]) =. Hene α ω = ω. Now we ompute iretly. Let t) = os2πt + ), sin2πt + )), where is an appropriate rotation fator. On one han, ω = x y) = x x x y + x y y = x y. y Sine this is a volume form on, we obtain ω = = π. However, ω = = = α α α x y) = α x ) y ) = os2πt + )2π os2πt + )) t os 2 2πt + )2πt 4 α os2πt + ) sin2πt + ))

Using the substitution u = 2πt +, = = 1 2 2πα+ 2πα+ os 2 u)u = 1 2 2πα+ 2 os 2 u) 1 + 1 u os2u) + 1 u = 1 2 sinu) osu) + u) 2πα+ = 1 2 sin2πt + ) os2πt + ) + 2πt + ) α = πα + 1 sin2πα + ) os2πα + ) sin) os)) 2 = πα + 1 sin4πα + 2) sin2)). 4 It is lear that, for small values of α, we have ω < π. Therefore we hek the maximum of this integral on [, 1]. It an be verifie by taking the erivative of this integral with respet to α or using Wolfram Alpha that the maximum of this integral ours at α = 1. Hene we always have, for our hoie of α, 1), ω > ω, so in partiular they are not equal. b) Let =, 1), an let ω = x, the oorinate funtion. Sine =, the integral of any form over the bounary is zero. Then 1 x = x = 1 ω. ) The step of the proof where Stokes Theorem fails is that, given a partition of unity Φ, the support of ω nee not be ontaine in finitely many Φ. Therefore we annot onlue ω = ω = Φ Φ sine the marke equality only hols when ω is supporte in finitely many. Problem 8.13. Suppose is a ompat orientable n-manifol with no bounary), an θ is an n 1)-form on. Show that θ is at some point. First, sine we may put a finite partition of unity on, we reue to the loal ase. We know that θ = θ = θ =. 5

Further, we know that θ is a volume form, so it is of the form θ = f x 1 x n for some funtion f. Sine at every point the term x 1 x n ontributes positively to the integral, if f were always positive or always negative, then the entire integral woul be always positive or always negative. Therefore f = ientially, or f is somewhere positive an somewhere negative, hene is somewhere zero by the mean value theorem. Sine the sign of f etermines the sign of θ, we are one. Problem 8.14. Let 1, 2 R n be ompat n-imensional manifols with bounary with 2 1 \ 1. Show that for any lose n 1)-form ω on 1, ω = ω. 1 2 An n-imensional submanifol of R n takes the inue orientation from R n, so i are orientable. Consier the manifol = 1 \ 2 2, so that = 1 2. Then applying Stokes theorem, = ω = ω = ω 1 2 ω, where the minus sign is introue sine the outwar pointing normal of 2 with respet to is the negation of the outwar pointing normal of 2 with respet to. Therefore ω = ω 1 2 as laime. 6