EXAMINATION INFORMATION PAGE Written examination

Similar documents
Solution to exam in PEF3006 Process Control at Telemark University College

7.2 Controller tuning from specified characteristic polynomial

Control Lab. Thermal Plant. Chriss Grimholt

Systems Engineering/Process Control L1

Systems Engineering/Process Control L1

Process Control, 3P4 Assignment 6

Solutions for Tutorial 10 Stability Analysis

CHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies Chapter 16

Process Control J.P. CORRIOU. Reaction and Process Engineering Laboratory University of Lorraine-CNRS, Nancy (France) Zhejiang University 2016

Fundamental Principles of Process Control

AMJAD HASOON Process Control Lec4.

SIMULATION SUITE CHEMCAD SOFTWARE PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS COURSE WITH CHEMCAD MODELS. Application > Design > Adjustment

CM 3310 Process Control, Spring Lecture 21

INTRODUCTION TO THE SIMULATION OF ENERGY AND STORAGE SYSTEMS

Class 27: Block Diagrams

Task 1 (24%): PID-control, the SIMC method

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies (Advanced Control) Cascade Control Time-Delay Compensation Inferential Control Selective and Override Control

Process Control, 3P4 Assignment 5

Exercise 1a: Transfer functions

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

Architectural Issues in Control System Design. Graham C. Goodwin. University of Newcastle, Australia

Process Control Hardware Fundamentals

YTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department

Process Control & Design

BITS-Pilani Dubai, International Academic City, Dubai Second Semester. Academic Year

MATH 23 Exam 2 Review Solutions

Process Solutions. Process Dynamics. The Fundamental Principle of Process Control. APC Techniques Dynamics 2-1. Page 2-1

Lynkurs Prosessregulering (Crash course process control) Sigurd Skogestad Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi Rom K4-211

B1-1. Closed-loop control. Chapter 1. Fundamentals of closed-loop control technology. Festo Didactic Process Control System

PID controllers, part I

DESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR ph CONTROL

Multiple Model Based Adaptive Control for Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Process

Control System Design

Control for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e

sc Control Systems Design Q.1, Sem.1, Ac. Yr. 2010/11

Appendix A: Exercise Problems on Classical Feedback Control Theory (Chaps. 1 and 2)

TS02 - Pre-Instructional Survey

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =

CHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

Process Dynamics, Operations, and Control Lecture Notes 2

Improved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback

Control of MIMO processes. 1. Introduction. Control of MIMO processes. Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes

Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain

Dynamic Behavior. Chapter 5

Math 266 Midterm Exam 2

Basic Procedures for Common Problems

Math 215/255 Final Exam, December 2013

Solutions for Tutorial 4 Modelling of Non-Linear Systems

Exercise 8: Level Control and PID Tuning. CHEM-E7140 Process Automation

Input-output Controllability Analysis

Subject: Introduction to Process Control. Week 01, Lectures 01 02, Spring Content

Control Introduction. Gustaf Olsson IEA Lund University.

Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control

ChE 6303 Advanced Process Control

APPM 2360 Section Exam 3 Wednesday November 19, 7:00pm 8:30pm, 2014

Exam in FRT110 Systems Engineering and FRTN25 Process Control

MS-E2133 Systems Analysis Laboratory II Assignment 2 Control of thermal power plant

Chapter 1 Basic Characteristics of Control Systems and their Representation Process and Instrument Diagrams

Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering

YTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department

Acceleration Feedback

Modeling and Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Hydraulic System

Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)

PROCESS CONTROL TUTORIAL

CHAPTER 13: FEEDBACK PERFORMANCE

Model predictive control of industrial processes. Vitali Vansovitš

Introduction to Process Control

APPM 2360: Midterm exam 1 February 15, 2017

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Chapter 7 Control. Part Classical Control. Mobile Robotics - Prof Alonzo Kelly, CMU RI

Competences. The smart choice of Fluid Control Systems

Parametric Functions and Vector Functions (BC Only)

Chapter 8. Feedback Controllers. Figure 8.1 Schematic diagram for a stirred-tank blending system.

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

CHAPTER 7 MODELING AND CONTROL OF SPHERICAL TANK LEVEL PROCESS 7.1 INTRODUCTION

Advanced control If single-loop feedback control (PID) alone is not good enough

Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL. Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 5. An Introduction to Feedback Control Systems

Experiment # 5 5. Coupled Water Tanks

Chapter 9. Electromagnetic Waves

Control System Design

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303)

Process Control Exercise 2

Midterm 2 Nov 25, Work alone. Maple is allowed but not on a problem or a part of a problem that says no computer.

Systems Engineering and Control

Solutions for Tutorial 3 Modelling of Dynamic Systems

MAT292 - Calculus III - Fall Solution for Term Test 2 - November 6, 2014 DO NOT WRITE ON THE QR CODE AT THE TOP OF THE PAGES.

MULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS

Control Of Heat Exchanger Using Internal Model Controller

130 CHAP. 4 Systems of ODEs. Phase Plane. Qualitative Methods. Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix

JUSTIFICATION OF INPUT AND OUTPUT CONSTRAINTS INCORPORATION INTO PREDICTIVE CONTROL DESIGN

PROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL Offset-Free Tracking of Model Predictive Control with Model Mismatch: Experimental Results

3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions

Dynamics and PID control. Process dynamics

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

AC&ST AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND SYSTEM THEORY SYSTEMS AND MODELS. Claudio Melchiorri

Model based control design

Transcription:

EXAMINATION INFORMATION PAGE Written examination Course code: Course name: PEF3006 Process Control Examination date: 30 November 2018 Examination time from/to: 09:00-13:00 Total hours: 4 Responsible course teacher: Docent Finn Aare Haugen (97019215, finn.haugen@usn.no) Campus: Porsgrunn Faculty: Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritme Sciences No. of problems: 8 No. of attachments: One appendix for formulas etc. No. of pages incl. front page and attachments: 6 Permitted aids: None except paper and pen. No calculator. If you can not calculate a numerical answer by hand, it is acceptable that you present an expression from which the correct answer can be calculated with a calculator if you had one. Information regarding attachments: The appendix contains information which may be useful in some of the problems. You must decide yourself which information to use. Comments: If you thin that an assumption for solving a specific problem is missing in the text, you should state an appropriate assumption yourself. The teacher will normally not visit the exam room during the exam time. It is not allowed to call on the teacher to as for help for interpreting or understanding the exam problems. Select the type of examination paper Spreadsheets Line sheets 1

Exam in Course PEF3006 Process Control Problem 1 (15%) Figure 1 shows a tan with a level control system. The outlet pump (the actuator) is a positive displacement pump. Figure 1 The process model is the following differential equation of the liquid level, derived from mass balance: A*dh/dt = Fin - Fout = Fin - u where u is the control signal generated by the level controller. The liquid surface area (tan cross-sectional area) is A = 2000 m2. Assume that the tan is a buffer tan aiming at attenuating inflow variations, i.e. the outflow becomes smoother than the inflow. It is specified that the level is reduced by less than 0.5 m after a stepwise reduction of the inflow of step amplitude 1 m3/s. Tune LC1 as a PI controller. For your answer you may use the following design formula for the closed loop time-constant: Tc = A*Δhmax/ΔFin Problem 2 (30%) Assume the tan in Figure 1 is used as a storage tan aiming at eeping the level at or close to its setpoint, hsp. The liquid surface area (tan cross-sectional area) is A = 2000 m2. a (10%) Assume that the dynamics of the outlet pump is represented by a time-delay τ = 10 s. Tune LC1 as a PI controller. b (10%) Fin is regarded as a process disturbance. Derive a feedforward controller for the level control system. c (5%) Shall LC1 have direct or reverse control action? Give a reason for your answer. d (5%) Assume that the outflow pump manipulated by the level controller is a centrifugal pump. The flow through a centrifugal pump is not given by the rotational speed of the pump alone. Instead, the flow depends on the rotational speed and environmental variables or disturbances lie variations of the pressure 2

difference across the pump inflow and outflow. Thus, if the level controller manipulates the rotational speed of the pump directly, it may happen that the actual pump flow varies due to disturbances. Assume that such flow variations are unfortunate, and that we want the actual pump flow to follow the flow demanded by the level controller (= flow setpoint) closely, despite the disturbances. Suggest an amendment of the level control structure shown in Figure 1 to obtain the aim that the actual pump flow becomes equal (or very close to) to the flow demanded by the level controller. Your answer should be in form of a Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&I D) of the (amended) level control system. Problem 3 (10%) Explain, and supplement with a figure, the principle (the behaviour) of a model-based predictive controller (MPC). Why is a state estimator an important part of an MPC? Problem 4 (5%) Figure 2 shows the response in the methane flow after a setpoint change in a methane flow control system of a biogas reactor. The controller is a PI controller with controller gain = 2 (in appropriate units) and Ti = 0.8 d. The stability of the control system is deemed too bad. Retune the PI controller from the response. Figure 2 Problem 5 (5%) Describe the (three) main elements of a sequential function chart (SFC), and include one example for each element. Also, show how these elements appear in an SFC (however, it is not necessary to draw a complete SFC). Problem 6 (5%) Why are PI controllers more often used than PID controllers in practical control systems? Why are PI controllers more often used than P controllers in practical control systems? Problem 7 (10%) Derive the transfer function H(s) = u(s)/e(s) of a PID controller. 3

Problem 8 (20%) Typical basic control requirements of a continuous production line are as follows: 1. The product flow is controlled (to follow its setpoint). 2. The product quality is controlled. 3. The mass (of liquid, gas) in vessels are controlled. 4. The temperature of vessels or pipelines are controlled. Draw a Piping & Instrumentation Diagram of a production line (imaginary or real) which is controlled according to the above requirements. 4

University of South-Eastern Norway Finn Aare Haugen (finn.haugen@usn.no) Appendix for the exam in PEF3006 Process Control 30.11 2018: Formulas etc. which may be useful at the exam dm(t) dt de(t) dt = i = i w i (t) (1) Q i (t) (2) E = CT = cmt = cρv T (3) Q = cf T (4) m v(t) = mẍ(t) = ma(t) = i F i (t) (5) 1 F 1 (s) + 2 F 2 (s) 1 f 1 (t) + 2 f 2 (t) (6) F (s)e τs f(t τ) (7) s n F (s) (n) f (t) (8) (step of amplitude ) (9) s s 2 t (ramp of slope ) (10) T s + 1 (T s + 1)s y(t) = K e t/t (11) T ( ) 1 e t/t (12) y(s) = H(s)u(s) (13) t 0 u dτ y(s) = K s }{{} H(s) u(s) (14) y(s) = K u(s) (15) } T s {{ + 1 } H(s) 1 5

y(t) = u(t τ) y(s) = e τs u(s) (16) }{{} H(s) T r i T i (17) u e { }}{ K t p de u = u 0 + K p e + e dτ + K p T d (18) }{{} T i 0 u p }{{}}{{ dt} u i u d P B = 100% K p (19) K p = 0.8K GG (20) T i = 1.5T ou (21) Process type H psf (s) (process) K p T i T d Integrator with delay K i s e τs 1 K i (T C +τ) 2 (T C + τ) 0 K Time-constant with delay T s+1 e τs T K(T C +τ) min [T, 2 (T C + τ)] 0 K i = S U (22) T C = τ (23) K p T i T d P 0, 5K pu 0 P PI 0.45K u pu 1,2 0 P PID 0.6K u P u pu 2 8 = T i 4 Instrumentation codes: K p T i T d PI 0.32K pu P u 0 As first letter: F = Flow. L = Level. P = Pressure. Q = Quality. T = Temperature. As subsequent letter: C = Controller. I = Indicator. T = Transmitter (sensor). V = Valve. Y = Function (math). 2 6