Analytical method related to authorised feed additive - 1i534

Similar documents
H 3 CO H 3 CO S CH 3

The analysis of organic acid content of additives, premix, feed, and water.

RESOLUTION OENO 33/2004 DETERMINATION OF SHIKIMIC ACID IN WINE BY HPLC AND UV-DETECTION

637. Thiamethoxam. HPLC method

Sulfotepp impurities in Chlorpyrifos EC formulations

IDENTIFICATION AND DETERMINATION OF HYDROQUINONE IN COSMETIC PRODUCTS 2 14/11/17 ACM 003 BY TLC AND HPLC

DISCLAIMER: This method:

Anion and Cation analysis with Professional IC - automatic dilution and sample preparation with SPM

Chemistry Gas Chromatography: Separation of Volatile Organics

Annex 2 Formaldehyde

Determination of Caffeine by HPLC

--> Buy True-PDF --> Auto-delivered in 0~10 minutes. GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB5009.

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF

This method describes the identification of the following prohibited colorants in cosmetic products:

CIPAC. CIPAC Free relevant impurities methods:

PYRIPROXYFEN TECHNICAL

TECHNICAL TEMEPHOS. 1. Specification. Full specification WHO/SIT/19.R4 Revised 10 December Description

Technical Procedure for Concentration Determination of Methamphetamine in Liquids via HPLC

Comparing the MICROLAB 600 to Volumetric Glassware and Air Displacement Pipettes. June 2011

Liquid storage: Holds the solvent which is going to act as the mobile phase. Pump: Pushes the solvent through to the column at high pressure.

VALIDATION OF A UPLC METHOD FOR A BENZOCAINE, BUTAMBEN, AND TETRACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE TOPICAL SOLUTION

National standard of People s Republic of China

Determination of Polymer Modifier in Asphalt

TECHNICAL BRODIFACOUM

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

SECTION D.2 AMMONIA NITROGEN

DETERMINATION OF DRUG RELEASE DURING DISSOLUTION OF NICORANDIL IN TABLET DOSAGE FORM BY USING REVERSE PHASE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY

Draft Method proposal: determination of glucoheptonic acid (HGA) in fertilizers.

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN AFRICA A. M. E. C. E. A

Exercise 6: Determination of Hardness of Water

Unit 3 Chemistry - Volumetric Analysis

Quantitative determination of ethephon in soluble concentration (SL) by Ion chromatography

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

Chemistry 3200 High Performance Liquid Chromatography: Quantitative Determination of Headache Tablets

Comparing the Microlab 600 to Volumetric Glassware and Air Displacement Pipettes. January 2013

GB/T Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB/T

The Nitrofurantoin Capsules Revision Bulletin supersedes the currently official monograph.

Experiment 6: Dehydration of 2-Methylcyclohexanol

Anethole. Gas chromatograhpy determination of trans-anethole in Spirit srinks of viti-vinicultural origin

*Correspondence to:

ANALYTICAL METHOD DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE ALDEHYDES IN AMBIENT AIR Page 1 of 11 Air sampling and analysis

Application Note No. 117 / 2013 Ammonia determination in hair dye

Solution Concentration

STUDY INITIATION DATE November 18, ANALYTICAL REPORT DATE December 12, AUTHORS Andrew Bosio Timothy D. Ballard

Tex-620-J, Determining Chloride and Sulfate Contents in Soil

INTERNATIONAL CHEMISTRY TESTING. 258 Main Street- Suite 311- Milford, MA Tel: Fax:

Ch 4-5 Practice Problems - KEY

Supporting information Online HPLC-ESI-HRMS Method for the Analysis and Comparison of Different Dissolved Organic Matter Samples

Development and Validation of a HPLC Method for Chlorphenamine Maleate Related Substances in Multicomponents Syrups and Tablets

EXPERIMENTS. Testing products of combustion: Reducing Copper(III) Oxide to Copper. Page 4

SIMULTANEOUS RP HPLC DETERMINATION OF CAMYLOFIN DIHYDROCHLORIDE AND PARACETAMOL IN PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS.

Technical Report. Determination of Nitrite and Nitrate in Smokeless Tobacco Products by Ion Chromatography and Continuous Flow Analysis

ANALYTICAL METHOD PROCEDURES

NaBr, H2SO4 CH3CH2CH2CH2Br + NaHSO4 + H2O. 1-Bromobutane bp C den MW n 1.439

Chapter 4 Chemical Quantities and Aqueous Reactions

Determination of Carbonyl Compounds In Water by Dinitrophenylhydrazine Derivatization and HPLC/UV*

Stoichiometry ( ) ( )

7. Stability indicating analytical method development and validation of Ramipril and Amlodipine in capsule dosage form by HPLC.

Ester Synthesis And Analysis: Aspirin and Oil of Wintergreen. Vanessa Jones November 19, 2015 Thursday 8:30 Lab Section Lab Partner: Melissa Blanco

Cyanide and sulfide analysis using amperometric detection and Metrosep A Supp /4.0

Carbonate content. SCAN-N 32:98 Revised White, green and black liquors and burnt lime sludge

Chemistry 301 Test #1

METHOD 8030A ACROLEIN AND ACRYLONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

NEW SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS FOR THE QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF OXOLAMINE IN FORMULATION

TERTIARY BUTYLHYDROQUINONE

SpeedDigester K-436, K-439 Determination of Hydroxyproline in Meat after Acid Hydrolyzation (Photometric method)

DOXYCYCLINE HYCLATE Final text to replace published monograph in The International Pharmacopoeia (November 2007)

Determination of Trace Cations in Power Plant Waters Containing Morpholine

High Pressure/Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

BRIEFING. (EXC: K. Moore.) RTS C Propylparaben C 10 H 12 O Benzoic acid, 4 hydroxy, propyl ester; Propyl p hydroxybenzoate [ ].

METHOD 8032A ACRYLAMIDE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

Teacher Resource and Assessment Book Exercises Unit 3 answers

Sodium Chloride - Analytical Standard

Development and validation a RP-HPLC method: Application for the quantitative determination of quetiapine fumarate from marketed bulk tablets

TEMPLATE FOR AN EXAMPLE STANDARD TEST METHOD

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

METHOD 3520B CONTINUOUS LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION

Supporting Information

IDENTIFICATION OF STEROIDS IN COSMETIC PRODUCTS BY TLC AND HPLC 1 02/12/2005 ACM 007 A. THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY (TLC)

#13 ph-titration of Weak Acids with Strong Bases

Figure 1. Structures for Vitamin B2 and Vitamin B1.

Selective Formation of Benzo[c]cinnoline by Photocatalytic Reduction of 2,2 Dinitrobiphenyl with TiO 2 and UV light irradiation

Appendix II- Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation

4023 Synthesis of cyclopentanone-2-carboxylic acid ethyl ester from adipic acid diethyl ester

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 83

GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYTICAL METHODS INTENDED FOR CIPAC COLLABORATIVE STUDY

Egualen Sodium Granules

Sample Preparation of Electronic Device Components for Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IEC Method :2017

METHOD 3665 SULFURIC ACID/PERMANGANATE CLEANUP

Final Report. Characterisation of Sample Report. Job No 2016/11/12-34 AS No. 1234A. Client Example Contact Sample. Signed Date 2017.

Determination of Total Bromine and Iodine Emission Spectrometric Method (ICP-OES) EuSalt/AS

Bulk ring-opening transesterification polymerization of the renewable δ-decalactone using

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

LAP-013. Procedure Title: Date: 6/28/96. Author: Raymond Ruiz and Tina Ehrman ISSUE DATE: 8/26/96 SUPERSEDES: 11/01/94.

Diquat 1,1 -ethylene-2,2 -bipyridium dibromide salt Paraquat 1,1 -dimethyl-4,4 -bipyridium dichloride salt Initial Preparation

HPLC Praktikum Skript

METHOD 3510B SEPARATORY FUNNEL LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION

Uncontrolled Copy. SOP 109 Ethylene Glycol Screen by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Table of Contents. 1. Principle of Assay...

Volumetric Analysis. Quantitative analysis answers the second question

Chapter 4: Verification of compendial methods

Transcription:

Title DETERMINATION OF MESO-TARTARIC ACID, (D- + L-TARTARIC ACID), OXALIC ACID, MONO- AND DIHYDROXYMALONIC ACID IN mta-solutions Subtitle Liquid chromatography

1 SCOPE Determination of 50-60 mg of meso-tartaric acid, 20-30 mg of (D- + L-tartaric acid), 0.05-2.5 mg of oxalic acid, 0.05-2.5 mg of monohydroxymalonic acid and 0.05-2.5 mg of dihydroxymalonic acid in 0.6 g of concentrated or 1.5 g of diluted mta-solution (see 8.1). All components are expressed in the H-form on anhydrous base. 2 PRINCIPLE Decomposition of Fe-tartrate complexes by reaction with an excess of hydroxide. Filtration of the formed Fe(OH) 3. Liquid chromatographic separation of the components by using an IOA 1000 Organic Acids column as stationary phase and sulphuric acid, c(h 2 SO 4 ) = 0.01 mol/l, as mobile phase. Detection with a Refractive Index-detector (see 8.6). Calculation versus an external standard. 3 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT 3.1 Liquid chromatograph 3.1.1 Pump : e.g. Gyrokotek High Precision pump model 300. 3.1.2 Injection valve : e.g. Rheodyne 7010 provided with a 20 µl sample loop. 3.1.3 Column : see 4.2. 3.1.4 Column oven : e.g. Spark Mistral. 3.1.5 Detector : Refractive Index, e.g. Showa-Denko model RI-71. 3.2 Output facilities 3.2.1 Data acquisition and integration system, e.g. Chromeleon. 3.3 Further requirements 3.3.1 Syringe filters, disposable, diameter 30 mm, pore size 0.45 m, PTFE/PP FFL/ML, color code green, Whatman ReZist TM Catalog Number 10463513. 3.3.2 Syringe, 2 ml, disposable. 3.3.3 Vials, glass, e.g. Alltech No. 66022. 3.3.4 Piston pipette, e.g. Eppendorf Research pipette, 0.1-10 ml. 4 REAGENTS 4.1 Mobile phase 4.1.1 Sulphuric acid, c(h 2 SO 4 ) = 0.01 mol/l. 4.2 Column 4.2.1 Stainless steel tube, length 300 mm, internal diameter 7.8 mm, IOA 1000 Organic Acids, as supplied by Alltech (No. 9646). Page 2 of 8

4.3 Calibration substances (see 8.3) 4.3.1 Meso-tartaric acid, c(c 4 H 6 O 6..H 2 O) > 98 % (m/m), e.g. Sigma T3259. Determine the meso-tartaric acid concentration ànd the concentration of D-+Ltartaric acid according to this SMA 992.05, 9.1.2 or applying NMR ( X % (m/m) of meso-tartaric acid.0aq ànd Y % of D-+L-tartaric acid.0aq). 4.3.2 D-tartaric acid, c(c 4 H 6 O 6 ) > 99 % (m/m), e.g. Aldrich T20-6. 4.3.3 L-tartaric acid, c(c 4 H 6 O 6 ) > 99 % (m/m), e.g. Aldrich T10-9. 4.3.4 Oxalic acid, c(c 2 H 2 O 4.2H 2 O) > 99 % (m/m), e.g. Aldrich 24753-7. 4.3.5 Monohydroxymalonic acid (tartronic acid), c(c 3 H 4 O 5 ) 97 % (m/m), e.g. Fluka 86320. Store this product in a refrigirator at 4 o C. 4.3.6 Disodium dihydroxymalonic acid (disodium mesoxalate), c(c 3 H 2 Na 2 O 6.H 2 O) 98 % (m/m), e.g. Aldrich 71740. 4.3.7 Multi component standard solutions A (2 x; see 8.4). Transfer to a 50 ml flask 55-65 mg of meso-tartaric acid, C 4 H 6 O 6..H 2 O (4.3.1; = Mcq 1 mg] and 20-30 mg of D-tartaric acid (4.3.2; = Mcq 2 mg)) or L-tartaric acid (4.3.3), each component weighted to the nearest 0.01 mg. Add 50 ml of sulfuric acid, c(h 2 SO 4 ) = 0.01 mol/l (4.1.1) and dissolve. Determine the mass of the contents to the nearest 0.1 mg (= Mt g). Analyze the solutions on the day of preparation (see 8.10). Prepare 2 separate solutions with slightly different amounts of meso- and L, D- tartaric acid; both calibration samples bracketing the test sample solution (see 6.3). 4.3.8 Multi component standard solution B, c(each component in anhydrous H-form) 0.25 mg/ml. Transfer to a 0.5 l flask 250 mg of oxalic acid (4.3.4; = Mcq 3 mg), 250 mg of monohydroxymalonic acid (4.3.5; = Mcq 4 mg) and 250 mg of disodium hydroxymalonic acid (4.3.6; = Mcq 5 mg), each component weighted to the nearest 0.1 mg. Dissolve in and dilute to 0.5 l with sulfuric acid, c(h 2 SO 4 ) = 0.01 mol/l (4.1.1). Determine the mass of the contents to the nearest 1 mg (= Mt g). 4.4 Further requirements 4.4.1 Water, doubly distilled or of equivalent purity. For example prepared by the Milli-RO/Milli-Q-System (Millipore). 4.4.2 Sodium hydroxide solution, c(naoh) = 5 mol/l. 5 SAMPLE Store the sample in a completely filled brown plastic flask or tube. Close the flask/tube properly to exclude oxygen. If the flask/tube cannot be completely filled cover the liquid with a nitrogen blanket. Avoid sunlight (UV light) and store the vessel in a refrigerator at 4 o C. The sample solutions are stable for at least 2 weeks. See 9.2.6. 6 PROCEDURE 6.1 Instrument settings (somewhat dependent on the instrument) Column : IOA 1000 Organic Acids, 300 x 7.8 mm. Temperature column : 10 o C. Mobile phase : sulphuric acid, c(h 2 SO 4 ) = 0.01 mol/l (4.1). Mobile phase flow : 0.3 ml/minute. Injection volume : 20 µl. Detector : RI-detector. Page 3 of 8

6.2 Calibration samples 6.2.1 Meso, D-+L-tartrate Analyze both standard solutions A (4.3.7) according to 6.4. 6.2.2 Decomposition products Prepare the calibration solutions (I - VII) as follows: transfer, using a piston pipette (3.3.4), the respective volume (= Vc g) of the multi standard-solution B (4.3.8) to seven 50 ml flasks, as stated in the next Table: Solution I II III IV V VI VII in ml in ml in ml in ml in ml in ml in ml Multi standard-solution (4.3.8) 0 0.2 1.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Add 50 ml of sulfuric acid, c(h 2 SO 4 ) = 0.01 mol/l (4.1.1). Determine the mass of the contents to the nearest 0.1 mg (= Maq g). Proceed according to 6.4. 6.3 Test sample Dilute 600 or 1500 mg (= Ms mg, weighted to the nearest 0.1 mg) of test portion with 25 ml of water in a 50 ml flask. Add an excess (see 8.8) of 1 ml of sodium hydroxide solution (4.4.2) and let the iron hydroxide precipitate for at least 1 hour (see 8.9). Determine the total mass of the contents to the nearest 0.1 mg (= M 2 g). Proceed according to 6.4. 6.4 Measurement Fill a syringe (3.3.2) with calibration/test sample solution and pass - for the test samples only - the solution through the clean-up filter (3.3.1) into a glass vial (3.3.3). Inject 20 µl of filtered (calibration) sample into the liquid chromatograph. Record the chromatogram with the RI-detector using identical integrator settings for the calibration and test samples, and determine (3.2.1) the peak areas of the components (= A). 7 EXPRESSION OF RESULTS 7.1 Calculation 7.1.1 Calibration functions (see 10.4) Calculate according to 9.1.1 the calibration functions: where: y = aq + bq.x aq = intercept of the calibration line for component q; bq = slope of the calibration line for component q; y = peak area (Ac) of component q in the calibration sample; x = concentration (= c) of mg of component q/g of calibration sample, calculated from (see formulae (01) (02) in 7.1.1.1): Mt = mass, in g, of each multicomponent standard solution prepared in 4.3.7; or Mt = mass, in g of the multicomponent standard solution prepared in 4.3.8 ànd Vc = aliquot, in g taken in 6.2.2; Maq = mass, in mg, of each calibration solution (6.2.2). Mcq = mass, in mg, of component q in the H-form on an anhydrous base (see 8.5), in the standard solutions (4.3.7; 4.3.8), using the formulae (03) (07) in 7.1.1.2. Page 4 of 8

7.1.1.1 Formulae for the calculation of x Meso- and D+L-tartaric acid x = Mcq Mt mg/g (01) Oxalic acid, mono- and dihydroxymalonic acid x = Mcq Vc. Mt Maq mg/g (02) 7.1.1.2 Formulae for the calculation of Mcq meso-tartaric acid: D-+L-tartaric acid: Mcq = Mcq 1. 150.1 X. 168.1 100 (03) Mcq = Mcq 2 + [Mcq 1. 150.1 Y. ] (04) 168.1 100 X = % (m/m) of meso-tartaric acid.0aq in the calibration substance 4.3.1; Y = % (m/m) of D-+L-tartaric acid.0aq in the calibration substance 4.3.1; Mcq 1 = mg of meso-tartaric acid.1aq in standard solution 4.3.7; Mcq 2 = mg of D- or L-tartaric acid.0aq in standard solution 4.3.7. Oxalic acid: Mcq = Mcq 3. 90. 0 1261. (05) Monohydroxymalonic acid: Mcq = Mcq 4 (06) Dihydroxymalonic acid: Mcq = Mcq 5. 136.1 180.0 (07) 7.1.2 Test sample Calculate the concentration of each component q, c(q), in the test sample using the formula: Asq - aq. c(q) = Ms. bq M 2. 100 % Page 5 of 8

where: aq, bq = see 7.1.1; Asq = peak area of component q in the test sample solution; Ms = mass, in mg, of the test portion; M 2 = mass, in g, of the contents of the 50 ml flask (see 6.3). Report the results to the nearest 0.01 %. 7.2 Statistical data 7.2.1 Repeatability Product Component c n k p r Sample A D+L tartaric acid 2.71 6 2 3 0.07 Meso tartaric acid 5.65 6 2 3 0.11 Sample B D+L tartaric acid 2.20 6 2 3 0.08 Meso tartaric acid 6.12 6 2 3 0.14 Sample C D+L tartaric acid 2.22 6 2 3 0.10 Meso tartaric acid 6.14 6 2 3 0.12 c n k p r : overall mean value, in % (m/m); : number of replicates per series; : number of laboratories; : number of series; : repeatability limit, in % (m/m). 7.2.2 Reproducibility Product Component c n k p R Sample A D+L tartaric acid 2.71 6 2 3 0.24 Meso tartaric acid 5.65 6 2 3 0.37 Sample B D+L tartaric acid 2.20 6 2 3 0.37 Meso tartaric acid 6.12 6 2 3 0.18 Sample C D+L tartaric acid 2.22 6 2 3 0.32 Meso tartaric acid 6.14 6 2 3 0.20 c : overall mean value, in % (m/m); n : number of replicates per series; k : number of laboratories; p : number of series; R : intermediate reproducibility limit, in % (m/m). 7.2.3 Limit of quantitation (LOQ) The limit of quantitation is not relevant for meso-, D+L-tartrate. For the 3 decomposition products the LOQ is calculated based on standard error of estimation, s e, of each of the calibration functions. Page 6 of 8

8 NOTES 8.1 mta-solutions Next to meso-tartaric acid and D- and L-tartaric acid the aqueous mta-solutions contain NaCl and Fe and various concentrations of decomposition products: oxalic acid, mono-and dihydroxymalonic acid. Diluted mta-solution: 0.58 % Fe, 1.6 % meso-tartaric acid, 0.7 % D- + L-tartaric acid. Concentrated mta-solution: 2.2 % Fe, 5.8 % meso-tartaric acid, 2.9 % D- + L-tartaric acid. The molar ratio meso : Fe = 1 : 1. Total tartaric acid: 67 % meso-tartaric acid + 33 % (D- + L-) tartaric acid. 8.2 Calibration substances Commercially available meso-tartaric acid can be contaminated with D+L-tartaric acid. Check the quality of the calibration substance using this HPLC-analysis, NMR- or ICanalysis. Performing additionally an acid-base titration and a KF-titration for the water concentration, can be required too. 8.3 Calibration A 2-point bracketing calibration is performed for quantifying the meso- and the D- +L-tartrate concentration. o The calibration equation is only valid within the small bracketing range. o An alternative is to use the average of the calibration factor (F q = x/y) for each component in further calculations. o A 7-points calibration procedure is used to quantify decomposition products. 8.4 D-, L-tartaric acid The retention time and sensitivity of D-tartaric acid and L-tartaric acid are the same. 8.5 Molecular masses C 4 H 6 O 6.H 2 O [meso-tartaric acid.h 2 O] : 168.1; C 4 H 6 O 6 [(meso)-tartaric acid] : 150.1; C 4 H 4 O 6 [(meso)-tartrate] : 148.1; C 2 H 2 O 4 [oxalic acid] : 90.0; C 2 H 2 O 4.2H 2 O [oxalic acid.2h 2 O] : 126.1; C 3 H 4 O 5 [monohydroxymalonic acid] : 120.1; C 3 H 4 O 6 [dihydroxymalonic acid] : 136.1; C 3 H 2 Na 2 O 6.H 2 O [disodium dihydroxy malonic acid] : 198.0. 8.6 Detector Instead of the RI-detector an UV-detector ( = 210 nm) can be used. 8.7 Accuracy Determine if Mcq < 100 mg its mass to the nearest 0.01 mg or incorporate a dilution step based on weights. 8.8 ph of the test sample solution A typical ph-value for mta-solutions is ph 4. Page 7 of 8

8.9 Fe-free filtrate The filtrate should be iron-free: c(fe) < 1 g in 25 ml filtrate 99.99 % removal efficiency. A Fe-removal efficiency of > 99 % is found in daily practice. 8.10 Stability multi-component standard solutions A Slightly alkaline standard solutions A have an increased stability. 9 REFERENCES None Page 8 of 8