Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies Luis C. Ho ( 何子山 ) The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science
Ho 2008, ARA&A Nuclear Activity in Nearby Galaxies Kormendy & Ho 2013, ARA&A Coevolution of Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies Ho 2013a, ApJ A Recalibration of the Black Hole Mass Scale for AGNs Ho 2013b, ApJ Quasars and the Mass Assembly of Elliptical Galaxies
Gebhardt et al. (2000) Ferrarese & Merritt (2000) Gültekin et al. (2009) black hole bulge
Courtesy of S. Heinz
0.0-0.5 log SFR / M O yr -1 Mpc -3-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5 0 2 4 6 Redshift (z)
79 3.0 All galaxies Early-type galaxies 2.5 u-r color 2.0 1.5 1.0 3.0 Indeterminate-type galaxies All AGN 1%AGN 3% AGN 5% AGN 8% AGN 10% AGN Late-type galaxies 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 Stellar Mass log M (solar masses) * Figure 8.3.1 Schawinski et al. (2010)
?
??
What is Mmin and Mmax?? What is scatter? What is slope? What is zeropoint? Active cf. inactive? Redshift evolution??
black hole demography
NGC 4889: M = 2 x 1010 M (McConnell et al. 2011)
7 New Megamasers! Kuo et al. (2011)
7 New Megamasers! Kuo et al. (2011)
Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion
Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion
Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs NGC 5548 FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Peterson et al. (2002)
Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs Radius-Luminosity NGC 5548 Relation FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Bentz et al. (2009) Peterson et al. (2002)
Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs Radius-Luminosity NGC 5548 Relation FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Bentz et al. (2009) Peterson et al. (2002) Woo et al. (2010)
Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs Radius-Luminosity NGC 5548 Relation FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Bentz et al. (2009) Peterson et al. (2002) M can be estimated to an accuracy of 0.3 0.5 dex for z 0 6 Woo et al. (2010)
-2-4 z = 0.40 z = 0.60 z = 0.80 z = 1.00-6 -8 log (M BH ) [Mpc -3 dex -1 ] -4-6 -8-4 -6-8 z = 1.20 z = 1.40 z = 1.60 z = 1.80 z = 2.15 z = 2.65 z = 3.20 z = 3.75-4 z = 4.25 z = 4.75 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11-6 Kelly & Shen (2012) -8-10 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 log M BH / M O
Greene & Ho (2004, 2007a, 2007b) Dong, Ho et al. (2012)
200 new sources Greene & Ho (2004, 2007a, 2007b) Dong, Ho et al. (2012)
NGC 4395 Filippenko & Ho (2003)
Greene, Ho & Barth (2008) Jiang, Greene & Ho (2011a, 2011b) HST/ACS
M galaxy correlations
Kormendy & Ho (2013)
NGC 1277
Kormendy & Ho (2013)
M σ relation
M σ relation M 10 9 M = 0.309 +0.037 0.033 200 km s 1 4.38±0.29 intrinsic scatter = 0.28.
M M bulge relation
M M bulge relation M 10 9 M = 0.51 +0.06 Mbulge 0.05 10 11 M 1.19±0.08 ; intrinsic scatter = 0.28 dex
M M bulge relation M 10 9 M = 0.51 +0.06 Mbulge 0.05 10 11 M 1.19±0.08 ; intrinsic scatter = 0.28 dex old value
extension to AGNs...
quasars in interacting host galaxies from our Cycle 12 amera makes it possible to detect tidal tails, interacting ve been missed with the ACS/HRC, WFPC2/PC, or Kim, Ho, et al. (2008a, 2008b) HST/ACS WFC G quasars, from our Cycle 12 ACS program. The AGN ff using GALFIT, leaving the host galaxy morphology
Kim, Ho, et al. (2013a, 2013b) Jiang, Greene & Ho (2011a, 2011b)
Gravitationally Lensed Quasars CASTLES Survey/NICMOS C. Y. Peng Ph.D. Thesis (2005)
Gravitationally Lensed Quasars CASTLES Survey/NICMOS C. Y. Peng Ph.D. Thesis (2005)
Gravitationally Lensed Quasars CASTLES Survey/NICMOS C. Y. Peng Ph.D. Thesis (2005)
CaT Mg Ib Fe Ca H+K Fe II emission A stars Greene & Ho (2006a, 2006b)
A new approach using H I (and other radio lines) Ho (2007a, ApJ, 668, 94) Bulge and Halo Kinematics Across the Hubble Sequence Ho (2007b, ApJ, 669, 821) The CO Tully-Fisher Relation and Implications for the Host Galaxies of High-Redshift Quasars Ho, Darling, & Greene (2008a, ApJS, 177, 103) A New H I Survey of Active Galaxies Ho, Darling, & Greene (2008b, ApJ, 681, 128) Properties of Active Galaxies Deduced from H I Observations
Tully-Fisher Relation
z = 6.42 Bertoldi et al. (2003)
[C II] 158 μm z = 6.42 Maiolino et al. (2012)
z = 7.1 Venemans et al. (2012)
evolution (?)
Woo et al. (2006, 2008) Treu et al. (2007)
Woo Bennert et al. et (2006, al. (2011) 2008) Treu et al. (2007)
Peng, Impey, Ho et al. (2006)
Δα = +0.70 dex Peng, Impey, Ho et al. (2006)
z = 2 6.4 z = 0 Ho (2007b) cf. Shields et al. (2006); Wu (2007); Wang et al. (2010) FWHM(CO)
Δα = +0.70 dex z = 2 6.4 z = 0 Ho (2007b) cf. Shields et al. (2006); Wu (2007); Wang et al. (2010) FWHM(CO)
evolution (?)... not so fast
Ho (2013a, 2013b)
AGN Feedback when, where, how?
Jahnke & Maccio (2010)
Jahnke & Maccio (2010) Kormendy & Ho (2013)
van Dokkum et al. (2010)
3C 303 MS 0719.9+7100 NGC 5548 PG 0157+001 MS 0144.2 0055 MS 1214.3+3811 MS 1232.4+1530 MS 1420.1+2956 Kim, Ho, et al. (2013a, 2013b)
Home Registration Abstract Submission Accommodation Contact Us Login