Combustion fronts in porous media with two layers

Similar documents
Stability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games

Traveling stripes in the Klausmeier model of vegetation pattern formation

Problem set 7 Math 207A, Fall 2011 Solutions

Introduction LECTURE 1

Turning points and traveling waves in FitzHugh-Nagumo type equations

Morse Theory for Lagrange Multipliers

Alexei A. Mailybaev Organizing Committee

The Higgins-Selkov oscillator

The first order quasi-linear PDEs

A Study of the Van der Pol Equation

CODIMENSION-ONE RIEMANN SOLUTIONS: MISSING RAREFACTIONS IN TRANSITIONAL WAVE GROUPS

BIFURCATION PHENOMENA Lecture 4: Bifurcations in n-dimensional ODEs

NBA Lecture 1. Simplest bifurcations in n-dimensional ODEs. Yu.A. Kuznetsov (Utrecht University, NL) March 14, 2011

Laminar Premixed Flames: Flame Structure

Canards at Folded Nodes

Hyperbolicity singularities in rarefaction waves

Chapter 3 Second Order Linear Equations

Spike-adding canard explosion of bursting oscillations

On low speed travelling waves of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation.

Front Speeds, Cut-Offs, and Desingularization: A Brief Case Study

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems

Integrodifferential Hyperbolic Equations and its Application for 2-D Rotational Fluid Flows

Shilnikov bifurcations in the Hopf-zero singularity

Math 4200, Problem set 3

ANSWERS Final Exam Math 250b, Section 2 (Professor J. M. Cushing), 15 May 2008 PART 1

THE CRITICAL WAVE SPEED FOR THE FISHER-KOLMOGOROV-PETROWSKII-PISCOUNOV EQUATION WITH CUT-OFF

Numerical Methods for Modern Traffic Flow Models. Alexander Kurganov

Travelling waves. Chapter 8. 1 Introduction

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Eighth Class

MA 201: Partial Differential Equations D Alembert s Solution Lecture - 7 MA 201 (2016), PDE 1 / 20

Homework Exercises and Solutions for Mathematics Fall 2016

8.1 Bifurcations of Equilibria

APPPHYS217 Tuesday 25 May 2010

Connecting orbits and invariant manifolds in the spatial three-body problem

Streamline calculations. Lecture note 2

1 Introduction Definitons Markov... 2

Math 124A October 11, 2011

Midterm 2 Nov 25, Work alone. Maple is allowed but not on a problem or a part of a problem that says no computer.

Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory

Exam in TMA4195 Mathematical Modeling Solutions

The stability of travelling fronts for general scalar viscous balance law

Stability of Patterns

Alberto Bressan. Department of Mathematics, Penn State University

Introduction to multiscale modeling and simulation. Explicit methods for ODEs : forward Euler. y n+1 = y n + tf(y n ) dy dt = f(y), y(0) = y 0

MATH 173: PRACTICE MIDTERM SOLUTIONS

On the Stability of the Best Reply Map for Noncooperative Differential Games

Solutions for B8b (Nonlinear Systems) Fake Past Exam (TT 10)

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

Front Propagation. Chapter Reaction-Diffusion Systems Single component systems

Answers to Problem Set # 01, MIT (Winter-Spring 2018)

Stochastic differential equations in neuroscience

tutorial ii: One-parameter bifurcation analysis of equilibria with matcont

Journal of Differential Equations

Exponentially small splitting of separatrices of the pendulum: two different examples. Marcel Guardia, Carme Olivé, Tere M-Seara

MS: Nonlinear Wave Propagation in Singular Perturbed Systems

Oct : Lecture 15: Surface Integrals and Some Related Theorems

CANARDS AND HORSESHOES IN THE FORCED VAN DER POL EQUATION

Figure 1: Ca2+ wave in a Xenopus oocyte following fertilization. Time goes from top left to bottom right. From Fall et al., 2002.

Answers to Problem Set Number 02 for MIT (Spring 2008)

A slow pushed front in a Lotka-Volterra competition model

Cyclicity of common slow fast cycles

Nonlinear Autonomous Dynamical systems of two dimensions. Part A

Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory

Rio de Janeiro, October 19 th, Alexei A. Mailybaev Organizing Committee

Melnikov Method for Autonomous Hamiltonians

This exam will be over material covered in class from Monday 14 February through Tuesday 8 March, corresponding to sections in the text.

CANARDS AT FOLDED NODES

Waves in a Shock Tube

1.7. Stability and attractors. Consider the autonomous differential equation. (7.1) ẋ = f(x),

Problem Set Number 01, MIT (Winter-Spring 2018)

Calculation of critical conditions for the filtration combustion model

Undercompressive shock waves and the Dafermos regularization

MATH 614 Dynamical Systems and Chaos Lecture 2: Periodic points. Hyperbolicity.

Differential Equations for Dyson Processes

Mathématiques appliquées (MATH0504-1) B. Dewals, Ch. Geuzaine

Hyperbolic PDEs. Chapter 6

LECTURE 1 INTRODUCTION TO NONLINEAR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS I. NONLINEAR DIFFUSION EQUATION

Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait

Numerical Methods for Problems with Moving Fronts Orthogonal Collocation on Finite Elements

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ

Controllability of linear PDEs (I): The wave equation

MATH 220: MIDTERM OCTOBER 29, 2015

TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA

Existence and Stability of Traveling Pulses in a Reaction-Diffusion-Mechanics System

One Dimensional Dynamical Systems

WIDELY SEPARATED FREQUENCIES IN COUPLED OSCILLATORS WITH ENERGY-PRESERVING QUADRATIC NONLINEARITY

SHOCK WAVES FOR RADIATIVE HYPERBOLIC ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS

Computation of homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits for flows

Governing Equations of Fluid Dynamics

Lecture 3: Asymptotic Methods for the Reduced Wave Equation

Conduction velocity restitution in models of electrical excitation in the heart

7 Planar systems of linear ODE

Regularity of competitive equilibria in a production economy with externalities

Bifurcation of Fixed Points

Partial Differential Equations

Hopf bifurcations, and Some variations of diffusive logistic equation JUNPING SHIddd

Group Method. December 16, Oberwolfach workshop Dynamics of Patterns

Name: Instructor: Lecture time: TA: Section time:

Coupling Between Fuel Mass Transfer and Free-Stream Mass Flow in Hybrid Combustion

EXACT DARK SOLITON, PERIODIC SOLUTIONS AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS IN A PERTURBED GENERALIZED NONLINEAR SCHRODINGER EQUATION

Transcription:

Combustion fronts in porous media with two layers layer 1 layer 2 Steve Schecter North Carolina State University (USA) Jesus Carlos da Mota Universidade Federal de Goiás (Brazil) 1

Overview Subject: Propagation of a combustion front through a porous medium with two parallel layers having different properties. Each layer admits a traveling combustion wave. The layers are coupled by heat transfer. Question: Does the two-layer system admit a traveling combustion wave? Answer, for a very simplified model: Small heat transfer: Yes, if the combustion waves in individual layers have approximately equal speed. Large heat transfer: Yes. Motivations: Relevant to thermally enhanced oil recovery. Little work on traveling waves in coupled systems. Exception: Amitabha Bose, Symmetric and antisymmetric pulses in parallel coupled nerve fibres, SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 55 (1995), pp. 1650 1674. Thanks to: Dan Marchesin (IMPA, Rio de Janeiro).

Model Porous medium with two layers: layer 1 layer 2 In each layer: porous rock coke (fuel) gas = oxygen + other We ignore heat loss to surrounding rock. Reaction: [coke] + [oxygen] [other gas] + [heat]

Balance of energy in each layer: t x [rock energy + gas energy + coke energy] = [flux of gas energy] + [heat produced by reaction] [heat transported to other layer] + [diffusion of heat] heat gas rock coke gas heat gas heat to other layer Balance of coke mass in each layer: t [coke mass] = [rate of consumption of coke in reaction] Assume the gas is incompressible, with specific volume and pressure independent of its composition. Then seepage velocity of gas is constant, and we can ignore balance of mass of gas and oxygen.

Dimensionless variables: u(x,t) temperature of layer 1 y(x, t) remaining coke in layer 1 v(x,t) temperature of layer 2 z(x,t) remaining coke in layer 2 Normalizations: Reservoir temperature is u = v = 0: no reaction. 0 y, z 1 Arrhenius reaction-rate function: f(u, y) = { ye E u if u > 0, 0 if u 0. y u Graph of f for fixed y

PDEs for two-layer model: ( ) (a 1 + b 1 y)u + ( ) 2 (0.1) u c 1 u = d 1 f(u, y) q(u v) + λ 1 t x x, 2 y (0.2) t = A 1f(u, y), ( ) (a 2 + b 2 z)v + ( ) 2 (0.3) v c 2 v = d 2 f(v,z) q(v u) + λ 2 t x x, 2 z (0.4) t = A 2f(v, z).

Finite-interval simulations Simulation with q = 0: 2 Temperature q = 0.0 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 In each layer a traveling wave forms, but the waves have different left states (combustion temperature) and different speeds.

Simulation with q = 0.47: 2 Temperature q = 0.47 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Moving from right to left: Ahead of the combustion front the temperature is 0 (the initial temperature). In the combustion zones, which differ in the two layers, the temperature rises rapidly to the layer combustion temperature, which is higher in layer 1 than layer 2. Behind the combustion zones the temperatures equilibrate at an intermediate value. The part of the solution from here to the right propagates as a traveling wave. Behind this point the solution in each layer approaches the boundary condition.

Simulation with q = 117.61: 2 Temperature q = 117.61 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Temperature profiles in the two layers are extremely close.

Simulations with different left boundary and initial conditions: 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 The traveling combustion wave that forms is independent of the injection temperature. It depends only on the system parameters and q.

For all simulations we use typical parameter values from the engineering literature: a 1 = 19.4840, a 2 = 16.7032, b 1 = 1.0, b 2 = 1.0, c 1 = 1.8054, c 2 = 2.1063, d 1 = 62.5415, d 2 = 50.9796, A 1 = 5.4093, A 2 = 4.4093, λ 1 = 0.0815, λ 2 = 0.0815. We shift and rescale the temperature so that 0 corresponds to the initial temperature of the porous medium T 0, and 1 corresponds to T 0 + 773.15.

Traveling wave system Look for traveling wave solution ( u(ξ),y(ξ), v(ξ),z(ξ) ), ξ = x σt, satisfying the boundary conditions u L u ξ y 1 ξ At the left, temperature is high, all coke is burned. At the right, reservoir temperature, all coke is present. u L, v L, and σ are unknown. (u,y, v, z)( ) = (u L, 0, v L, 0) (burned), (u,y, v, z)( ) = (0, 1, 0, 1) (unburned), ( u,ẏ, v, ż)( ) = ( u, ẏ, v, ż)( ) = (0, 0, 0, 0).

Second-order traveling wave system: (0.5) (0.6) (0.7) (0.8) σ d ( (a1 + b 1 y)u ) + d dξ dξ (c d 2 u 1u) = d 1 f(u, y) q(u v) + λ 1 dξ, 2 σ dy dξ = A 1f(u, y), σ d ( (a2 + b 2 z)v ) + d dξ dξ (d d 2 v 2v) = d 2 f(v,z) + q(u v) + λ 2 dξ, 2 σ dz dξ = A 2f(v, z). To convert to a first-order system: Integrate (0.5) (0.8) from ξ to +, and use (u,y, v,z)( ) = (0, 1, 0, 1) and u( ) = v( ) = 0:

λ 1 u = σ(a 1 + b 1 y)u + c 1 u + d 1 f(u, y) d ξ σ(1 y) = A 1 f(u, y) d ξ, ξ λ 2 v = σ(a 2 + b 2 z)v + c 2 v + d 2 f(v, z)d ξ σ(1 z) = A 2 f(v, z) d ξ. ξ ξ ξ ξ ξ q(u v)d ξ, q(v u) d ξ, Let w(ξ) = ξ q(u v)d ξ, the total heat difference between the layers from ξ to the right.

Two-layer traveling-wave system: (0.9) (0.10) (0.11) (0.12) (0.13) u = 1 ( σ ( b 1 uy + a 1 u + d 1 (y 1) ) ) + c 1 u w, λ 1 A 1 ẏ = 1 σ A 1f(u, y), v = 1 ( σ ( b 2 vz + a 2 v + d 2 (z 1) ) ) + c 2 v + w λ 2 A 2 ż = 1 σ A 2f(v,z), ẇ = q(v u). Boundary conditions: (u,y, v, z,w)( ) = (u L, 0, v L, 0, w L ) (burned), (u,y, v,z, w)( ) = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0) (unburned). One-layer traveling wave system: Set w = 0 in (0.9) (0.10), with boundary conditions (u, y)( ) = (u L, 0), (u,y)( ) = (0, 1).,

Combustion fronts in one layer One-layer traveling wave system (system parameters fixed): (0.14) (0.15) u = 1 ( σ ( b 1 uy + a 1 u + d 1 (y 1) ) ) + c 1 u, λ 1 A 1 ẏ = 1 σ A 1f(u, y). Phase portrait for σ > c 1 a 1 : y 1?. u=0 u L (σ) u We want a connecting orbit from the hyperbolic saddle U L (σ) = (u L (σ), 0) to the nonhyperbolic equilibrium U R = (0, 1).

y 1?. u=0 u L (σ) u Definition 0.1. A connecting orbit from a hyperbolic equilibrium U L to a nonhyperbolic equilibrium U R is called strong if it lies in the stable manifold of U R. The corresponding traveling wave is also called strong. Theorem 0.2. There is a number σ, with c 1 a 1 < σ <, such that the onelayer system has a connecting orbit from U L (σ) to U R if and only if σ σ <. The connecting orbit is strong if and only if σ = σ.

Proof. 1. Phase portrait of (0.14) (0.15) for large σ: Let σ = 1, multiply the resulting system by by ǫ: ǫ (0.16) (0.17) u = 1 λ 1 ( ( b 1 uy + a 1 u + d 1 ẏ = ǫ 2 A 1 f(u, y). Fast-slow form. Phase portrait for ǫ = 0: y (y 1) ) ) + ǫc 1 u A 1, 1 d 1 /(a 1 A 1 ) u There is a normally hyperbolic curve of equilibria. Therefore for small ǫ, near it there is a normally hyperbolic invariant curve.

Phase portrait for small ǫ or large σ: y 1 u For large σ, there are connections, but they are not strong. 2. Phase portrait of (0.14) (0.15) for small σ > c 1 a 1 : Let σ = c 1 a 1 +τ. Since u(σ) as τ 0, also let u = 1 s. We obtain the following system for s > 0 (corresponding to u > 0): (0.18) ṡ = s ( ( c 1 + τ) ( b 1 y + a 1 + d 1 (y 1)s ) ) c 1, λ 1 a 1 A 1 (0.19) ẏ = A 1a 1 c 1 + a 1 τ ye Es.

Phase portrait for τ = 0: y s Phase portrait for small τ > 0: y s Phase portrait of (0.14) (0.15) for small σ > c 1 a 1 : 1 y For small σ > c 1 a 1, there is no connection. There must be a connection for some intermediate σ. u

3. Define a separation function S(σ) between W u (U L (σ)) and W s (U R ). y 1 S(σ)<0 At a value σ = σ where the separation is 0 (i.e., where there is a strong connection), let the connecting solution be (u (t),y (t)), and let T(t) = u u (u (t),y (t)) + ẏ y (u (t), y (t)). Then we have the well-known Melnikov integral formula ( t ) S (σ ) = exp T(s) ds This is positive. 0 ( u (t),ẏ (t)) u ( ẏ σ (u (t), y (t)), u ) σ (u (t), y (t)) Therefore the value of σ at which a strong connection exists is unique. dt.

We regard only strong traveling waves as physical. Reasons: In numerical simulations of the PDE, only strong combustion fronts seem to form. If (u (ξ),y (ξ)) is a strong connection, ξ 0 u (ξ) dξ is finite, because u(ξ) approaches 0 exponentially. Thus the total heat ahead of the combustion front is finite. This conclusion does not hold for connections that are not strong. Since the source of the heat is the combustion front, how could there be an infinite amount of heat ahead of it? In other combustion contexts, the addition to the equations of perturbation terms such as heat loss to the rock formation causes the zero eigenvalues at unburned states to become positive, thus eliminating connections that are not strong. (However, the unburned states remain equilibria, even though they are nonhyperbolic before perturbation.)

Two-layer traveling wave system: equilibria u = 1 ( σ ( b 1 uy + a 1 u + d 1 (y 1) ) ) + c 1 u w, λ 1 A 1 ẏ = 1 σ A 1f(u, y), v = 1 ( σ ( b 2 vz + a 2 v + d 2 (z 1) ) ) + c 2 v + w, λ 2 A 2 ż = 1 σ A 2f(v,z), ẇ = q(v u). Restrict to: 0 y, z 1. Assume: σ > max ( c1 a 1, c 2 a 2 ). For q = 0: ẇ = 0. There is a normally hyperbolic curve of equilibria with y = z = 0. There is a nonhyperbolic equilibrium X R = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0).

(0,1,0,1,0) y,z 2d 3d u,v w (u L (w,σ),0,v L (w,σ),0,w) There is one value of w, w = w L (σ), for which u L (σ) = v L (σ).

For q > 0: There is a normally hyperbolic invariant curve of equilibria with y = z = 0. It contains one equilibrium X L (σ), for which u = v and w = w L (σ). There is a nonhyperbolic equilibrium X R = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0). y,z (0,1,0,1,0) 2d 3d u,v w (u L (w,σ),0,u L (w,σ),0,w) with w=w L (σ) We want a strong connecting orbit from X L (σ) to X R. We expect strong connections for isolated values of σ.

Combustion fronts in two layers for large q Fix the system parameters. Theorem 0.3. If q is sufficiently large, there is a wave speed σ (q) for which the traveling wave system has a strong connection from X L (σ ) to X R. Proof. Let Using to denote d dη, we obtain q = 1 ǫ 2, w = ω ǫ, ξ = ǫη. (0.20) (0.21) u = ǫh(u, y, σ) ω λ 1, v = ǫk(v,z,σ) + ω λ 2, (0.22) y = ǫ A 1 f(u, y), σ (0.23) z = ǫ A 2 f(v, z), σ (0.24) ω = v u,

Set ǫ = 0: (0.25) (0.26) (0.27) (0.28) (0.29) u = ω, λ 1 v = ω, λ 2 y = 0, z = 0, ω = v u. A linear equation. There is a 3-dimensional plane of equilibria S 0 = {(u, v,y, z, ω) : v = u and ω = 0}. The eigenvalues of (0.25) (0.29) are 0, 0, 0, ±( 1 λ 1 + 1 λ 2 ) 1 2, so S 0 is a normally hyperbolic. For small ǫ > 0, any compact part of S 0 perturbs to a normally hyperbolic invariant manifold S ǫ. In S ǫ, v u everywhere. For variables on S ǫ we use (u,y, z).

DE on S ǫ, in the variables (u, y,z), in the slow time ξ: (0.30) u = 1 λ 1 + λ 2 (λ 1 h(u,y, σ) + λ 2 k(u,y,σ)), (0.31) ẏ = A 1 f(u, y), σ (0.32) ż = A 2 f(u, z), σ plus terms of order ǫ. With ǫ = 0, this describes one-layer with two fuels. Phase portrait on S ǫ to lowest order for σ > c 1+c 2 a 1 +a 2 ; y 1 z 1 u Study large σ and small σ > c 1+c 2 a 1 +a 2 as in the one-layer case. We have not been able to show σ is unique.

Combustion fronts in two layers for small q P = system parameter space. For Π P and q = 0, there is a strong traveling wave in layer i with speed σ i (Π). M = {Π P : σ 1 (Π) = σ 2 (Π)}. A point Π M is regular if D(σ 1 σ 2 )(Π) 0. Theorem 0.4. Let Π be a regular point of M, and let σ = σ 1 (Π ) = σ 2 (Π ). Then for small q > 0 there is an open subset U q of P near Π where there is a strong traveling wave with speed near σ. q π Π M

Explanation: Write Π = ( Π, π), where π is chosen so that at Π = ( Π, π ), the partial derivative σ 1 σ 2 in the π-direction is nonzero. Fix Π = Π. Write the traveling wave system as (0.33) (0.34) (0.35) (0.36) (0.37) U = G(U,w,σ,π), V = H(V, w,σ,π), ẇ = q(v u), σ = 0, π = 0, with U = (u, y), V = (v, z), G = (G 1,G 2 ) and H = (H 1,H 2 ). State space is now UV wσπ-space (dimension = 7), and q is a parameter. In short: X = F(X, q), X = (U,V, w,σ,π).

Important equilibria for q = 0: L 0 = {(u,y, v,z, w,σ, π) : u = u L (w,σ,π) = σd 1 A 1 w A 1 (σa 1 c 1 ), v = v L (w,σ,π) = σd 2 + A 2 w A 2 (σa 2 c 2 ), y = z = 0}, R 0 = {(u, y,v, z,w,σ,π) : u = v = w = 0 and y = z = 1}. R 0 y,z u,v w,σ,π L 0 L 0 has dimension 3, it s a normally hyperbolic manifold of equilibria. W u (L 0 ) has dimension 5 R 0 has dimension 2. W s (R 0 ) has dimension 4 We expect W u (L 0 ) W s (R 0 ) to have dimension 2. What is it?

Let u L = u L(0,σ, π ). v L = v L(0, σ,π ). W u (L 0 ) and W s (R 0 ) meet transversally along the a two-dimensional sheet of connections from (u L, 0,v L, 0, 0, σ,π ) to (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, σ, π ): (U,V, w,σ,π) = (U (ξ),v (ξ + η), 0, σ,π ). v,z.. (u* L,0,0,1) (0,1,0,1).. (u* L,0,v* L,0) (0,1,v* L,0) u,y Same picture is in paper of Bose.

For small q > 0: R 0 persists as a 2-dimensional set of equilibria R q. W s (R q ) has dimension 4. There is a 3-dimensional normally hyperbolic invariant manifold L q near L 0. W u (L q ) has dimension 5. W u (L q ) W s (R q ) has dimension 2 (persistence of transversal intersections). What do orbits in W u (L q ) W s (R q ) look like? DE on L q to lowest order, in slow time: (0.38) (0.39) (0.40) w = v L (w,σ,π) u L (w,σ,π), σ = 0, π = 0. For small q > 0: There is a 2-dimensional sheet of equilibria E q in L q given exactly by w = w L (σ,π). All equilibria in E q have u = v and are repelling within L q.

Solutions in W u (L q ) W s (R q ) are near a singular solution : y,z (0,1,0,1,0) 2d fast w L (σ*,π*) slow w (σ,π)=(σ*,π*) u,v Proceeding backward from (0, 1, 0, 1, 0): Fast part: one of the connections in the last picture to (u L, 0,v L, 0, 0) (i.e., a pair of one-layer combustion waves, perhaps shifted). Slow part: y and z remain 0 (the coke is burned), the temperatures slowly equilibrate (at a value between u L and v L ).

To study small q > 0, parameterize the connecting orbits from (u L, 0,v L, 0, 0) to (0, 1, 0, 1, 0) for (σ,π,q) = (σ,π, 0) by ζ, α ζ β: v,z.. (u* L,0,0,1) (0,1,0,1) X(β) X(ζ).. (u* L,0,v* L,0) X(α) (0,1,v* L,0) u,y Separation function between W u (L q ) and W s (R q ): S : ζσπq-space R 2. S(ζ,σ,π, 0) 0 The implicit function lets us solve the equation for (σ,π) in terms of (ζ,q) with S(ζ,σ,π, q) = 0 (σ(ζ, 0), π(ζ, 0)) = (σ, π ).

Graph of π(ζ,q): q S=0 π* π ζ We wish to show that π q (ζ, 0) is not constant. Theorem 0.5. As ζ α, π q π (ζ, 0), and as ζ β, (ζ, 0) ; or q the reverse. In particular, for small q > 0, the range of π(ζ,q) includes an open interval.

Proof. π q (ζ, 0) = M q(ζ)n σ M σ N q (ζ) M σ N π M π Nσ, with each term a Melnikov integral. In particular, M q (ζ) = ψ15(ξ) F ( q dξ = ψ15(ξ) v ( ξ + η (ζ) ) ) u (ξ) dξ and N q (ζ) = φ 25(η) F ( q dη = φ 25(η) v (η) u ( η η (ζ) )) dη. Near ζ = α, the uy-component of the orbit arrives near (0, 1) while the vzcomponent is still near (vl, 0). The orbit spends a long time with (u,y, v,z) near (0, 1,vL, 0), where v u is large positive. Meanwhile ξ is very large, so ψ 15(ζ) is near a positive constant. The integral becomes large. The traveling wave associated with a nearby connecting orbit has the combustion zones in the two layers displaced.

Concluding remarks Numerical results have been pretty well explained. Stability of these waves has not yet been analyzed. It may be possible to prove existence of a strong connection for any values of the system parameters using the Conley index. Can other models be analyzed similarly?