Dark anti-atoms. Quentin Wallemacq IFPA, AGO Dept., University of Liège. CosPa Meeting 19 th of November 2014

Similar documents
Strongly interacting dark matter doesn t explain the DAMA signal

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 7 Nov 2012

Technical Specifications and Requirements on Direct detection for Dark Matter Searches

Milli-interacting dark matter interpretation of the direct-search experiments

Status of Dark Matter Detection Experiments

A survey of recent dark matter direct detection results

Dark Matter Searches. Marijke Haffke University of Zürich

SuperCDMS: Recent Results for low-mass WIMPS

DARK MATTER. Martti Raidal NICPB & University of Helsinki Tvärminne summer school 1

No combined analysis of all experiments available

SuperCDMS SNOLAB: A G2 Dark Matter Search. Ben Loer, Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics On behalf of the SuperCDMS Collaboration

Esperimenti bolometrici al Gran Sasso: CUORE e CRESST

What is the probability that direct detection experiments have observed Dark Matter?

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 4 Nov 2017

Composite dark matter

The Direct Search for Dark Matter

Direct dark matter search with XMASS. K. Abe for the XMASS collaboration

Measurement of 39 Ar in Underground Argon for Dark Matter Experiments

Status of DM Direct Detection. Ranny Budnik Weizmann Institute of Science

DarkSide new results and prospects

Down-to-earth searches for cosmological dark matter

ASTROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF MIRROR DARK MATTER

Sensitivity of sodium iodide cryogenic scintillation-phonon detectors to WIMP signals

Dark Matter and Dark Energy components chapter 7

Dark atoms with nuclear shell: a status review

Background and sensitivity predictions for XENON1T

Search for Inelastic Dark Matter with the CDMS experiment. Sebastian Arrenberg Universität Zürich Doktorierendenseminar 2010 Zürich,

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Toward A Consistent Picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA. Chris Kelso Fermilab and University of Chicago Cosmology on the Beach Jan.

Lecture 12. Dark Matter. Part II What it could be and what it could do

Direct Detection of Dark Matter. Lauren Hsu Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics TRISEP Summer School, June 10, 2014

Standard LHC

Recent developments in the understanding of Dark Matter

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 6 Oct 2010

Collaborazione DAMA & INR-Kiev. XCVIII Congresso SIF Napoli, 18 Settembre F. Cappella

Searches for Low-Mass WIMPs with CDMS II and SuperCDMS

Inelastic Dark Matter and DAMA

On Symmetric/Asymmetric Light Dark Matter

Vincenzo Caracciolo for the ADAMO collaboration National Laboratory of Gran Sasso - INFN.

BubXe: a liquid xenon bubble chamber for Dark Matter detection!

light dm in the light of cresst-ii

Background Studies for the XENON100 Experiment. Alexander Kish Physics Institute, University of Zürich Doktorandenseminar August 30, 2010 UZH

Detectors for astroparticle physics

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

Direct detection detection of recoil nuclei after interaction of DM particle in large underground scale detector. DAMA, CDMS, ZENON... experiments.

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Inert Doublet Model and DAMA:

Effective theory of dark matter direct detection. Riccardo Catena. Chalmers University of Technology

Search for Low Energy Events with CUORE-0 and CUORE

TWO-PHASE DETECTORS USING THE NOBLE LIQUID XENON. Henrique Araújo Imperial College London

Dark Matter. Evidence for Dark Matter Dark Matter Candidates How to search for DM particles? Recent puzzling observations (PAMELA, ATIC, EGRET)

Ge and Dark Matter Searches: CDEX, present and future

Dennis Silverman UC Irvine Physics and Astronomy Talk to UC Irvine OLLI May 9, 2011

The Sommerfeld Enhancement for Thermal Relic Dark Matter with an Excited State

CHANNELING IN DIRECT DARK MATTER DETECTION

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 22 Dec 2016

The XENON1T experiment

Development of a New Paradigm

LUX: A Large Underground Xenon detector. WIMP Search. Mani Tripathi, INPAC Meeting. Berkeley, May 5, 2007

Measuring Dark Matter Properties with High-Energy Colliders

Doojin Kim University of Wisconsin, WI November 14th, 2017

Puzzles of Dark Matter in the Light of Dark Atoms

Whither WIMP Dark Matter Search? Pijushpani Bhattacharjee AstroParticle Physics & Cosmology Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata

Dark matter search with the SABRE experiment

Sensitivity and Backgrounds of the LUX Dark Matter Search

Direct Detection of! sub-gev Dark Matter

Light Dark Matter and XENON100. For the XENON100 Collaboration Rafael F. Lang Columbia University

Axion Searches Overview. Andrei Afanasev The George Washington University Washington, DC

LHC searches for dark matter.! Uli Haisch

The Mystery of Dark Matter

UCLA Dark Matter 2014 Symposium. Origins and Distributions of the Backgrounds. 15 min

Scintillation efficiency measurement of Na recoils in NaI(Tl) below the DAMA/LIBRA energy threshold

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN. K. Scholberg, Duke University On behalf of the COHERENT collaboration August 2, 2017 DPF 2017, Fermilab

Project Paper May 13, A Selection of Dark Matter Candidates

Chapter 12. Dark Matter

Publications of Francesco Arneodo: journal articles

ANAIS: Status and prospects

The interaction of radiation with matter

Week 3 - Part 2 Recombination and Dark Matter. Joel Primack

Beam Dump Experiments at JLab and SLAC

The Search for Dark Matter. Jim Musser

Recent results from PandaX- II and status of PandaX-4T

The Search for Dark Matter with the XENON Experiment

DETECTOR RESPONSE TO LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR RECOILS. D Ann Barker and D.-M. Mei University of South Dakota

Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams

DARK MATTER SEARCHES AT CANFRANC: ANAIS AND ROSEBUD: an update INTRODUCTION AND EXPERIMENTAL GOALS SUMMARY OF RECENT ACHIEVEMENTS AND EFFORTS

6 Neutrons and Neutron Interactions

Dark Matter Search Results from the Silicon Detectors of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment

Direct dark matter search using liquid noble gases

Dark matter search by exclusive studies of X-rays following WIMPs nuclear interactions

LZ and Direct Dark Matter Detection

Update on Dark Matter and Dark Forces

Lecture 3: Big Bang Nucleosynthesis The First Three Minutes

Prospects for the Direct Detection of the Cosmic Neutrino Background

COLUMNAR RECOMBINATION JIN LI INSTITUTE FOR BASIC SCIENCE CYGNUS2015 CONFERENCE JUN.3, 2015

Cryodetectors, CRESST and Background

Neutrinos and DM (Galactic)

Surprises in (Inelastic) Dark Matter

Physics 100 PIXE F06

Not reviewed, for internal circulation only

Transcription:

Dark anti-atoms Quentin Wallemacq IFPA, AGO Dept., University of Liège CosPa Meeting 19 th of November 2014 Q. Wallemacq, J.R. Cudell, arxiv:1411.3178

Introduction The status of direct-search experiments DAMA/LIBRA: CDMS-II/Si: 3 nuclear recoils at 8.2, 9.5 and 12.3 kev with a 5%-probability to be due to background Annual modulation of the event rate at the 9.3σ C.L. in the (2-6) kev energy interval CoGeNT: CDMS-II/Ge, supercdms, XENON100, LUX: No signal that cannot be explained by background Annual modulation of the bulk events at the 2.2σ C.L. in the (0.5-2) kev energy interval 1/11

Introduction The status of direct-search experiments Rules of the game: - DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation at the 9.3σ C.L. exists and is due to DARK MATTER! - CoGeNT annual modulation does not exist Davis et al. (2014) - CDMS-II/Si events are due to a fluctuation of the background - Ensure full consistency with the null results from CDMS-II/Ge, supercdms, XENON100 and LUX 2/11

Dark anti-atoms The model DAMA: no distinction between NUCLEAR RECOILS (neutrons, WIMPs) and ELECTRON RECOILS (X/γ-ray photons, charged particles,...) 3/11

Dark anti-atoms The model DAMA: no distinction between NUCLEAR RECOILS (neutrons, WIMPs) and ELECTRON RECOILS (X/γ-ray photons, charged particles,...) No NR in all the others Need to THERMALIZE in terrestrial crust 3/11

Dark anti-atoms The model DAMA: no distinction between NUCLEAR RECOILS (neutrons, WIMPs) and ELECTRON RECOILS (X/γ-ray photons, charged particles,...) No NR in all the others Need to THERMALIZE in terrestrial crust Thermal DM particles: formation of BOUND STATES with atoms in the detector DM SM γ Signal! 3/11

Dark anti-atoms The model DAMA: no distinction between NUCLEAR RECOILS (neutrons, WIMPs) and ELECTRON RECOILS (X/γ-ray photons, charged particles,...) No NR in all the others Need to THERMALIZE in terrestrial crust Thermal DM particles: formation of BOUND STATES with atoms in the detector DM SM γ Signal! Bound state: need for an attractive interaction Dark anti-atoms 3/11

Dark anti-atoms The model Dark anti-hydrogen atom Standard atom e + a 0 γ ε γ Ze - 1 Å p - p - and e + electric milli-charges of values ±εe Holdom (1986), Foot (2000), Feldman et al. (2007), Cline (2012) Zp 4/11

Dark anti-atoms The model Dark anti-hydrogen atom Standard atom e + a 0 γ ε γ Ze - 1 Å p - p - and e + electric milli-charges of values ±εe Holdom (1986), Foot (2000), Feldman et al. (2007), Cline (2012) Zp 3 model parameters: m ~ 1 TeV (m=m p >>m e ) ε ~ 5.10-4 a 0 ~ 30 fm 4/11

Constraints on milli-charges From cosmology, astrophysics: Cooling of red giants and white dwarfs Raffelt (1996), Davidson et al. (2000) Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Davidson et al. (2000) ε < 10-14 for m p, m e < 1 MeV OK since m p ~ 1 TeV m e ~ 1 GeV From laboratory: Invisible decay of positronium: ε < 3.4 10-5 for m p, m e < m e Badertscher et al. (2007) Accelerators: ε < 0.1 for, > 1 GeV m p m e Prinz et al. (1998) OK OK 5/11

Constraints on self-interacting DM Self-interacting dark matter: Constraints from: Bullet cluster Halo shapes Formation of a dark disk Randall et al. (2013) SUBDOMINANT dark sector: at most 5% of total dark mass of halos ρ dark atoms = f ρ local 0.3 GeV/cm 3 6/11

From space to underground detectors Thermalization in terrestrial matter Dark matter wind Dark atoms hit the surface of the earth Lose energy Undergo elastic collisions with terrestrial atoms Energy loss per unit path length: de dx E 0 de Penetration length: x= Eth < 1 km de /dx Typical depth of underground detectors Drift towards the center of the earth (~10 cm/s) Reach underground detector with thermal energies 7/11

From space to underground detectors Bound-state-formation events Radiative capture of thermal dark anti-atoms by atoms of the active medium: E ~ T d 8/11

From space to underground detectors Bound-state-formation events Radiative capture of thermal dark anti-atoms by atoms of the active medium: E1 p-bound state E ~ T d γ Below threshold 8/11

From space to underground detectors Bound-state-formation events Radiative capture of thermal dark anti-atoms by atoms of the active medium: E ~ T d E1 p-bound state E1 s-bound state γ γ Below threshold ~ kev 8/11

From space to underground detectors Bound-state-formation events Radiative capture of thermal dark anti-atoms by atoms of the active medium: E ~ T d E1 p-bound state E1 s-bound state γ γ Below threshold ~ kev Electron Nuclear recoils! Bound-state-formation rate: R ~ capt v Maxwell- Boltzann velocity distribution at T d 8/11

Binding to very heavy elements DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation: R ~ 0.04 cpd/kg Requires small values of a 0 ~ 30 fm Strong screening Binding only to high-z elements (Z > Z min ) m = 1 TeV ε = 5.10-4 9/11

Binding to very heavy elements DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation: R ~ 0.04 cpd/kg Requires small values of a 0 ~ 30 fm Strong screening Binding only to high-z elements (Z > Z min ) Above tungsten (Z=74) m = 1 TeV ε = 5.10-4 9/11

Binding to very heavy elements DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation: R ~ 0.04 cpd/kg Requires small values of a 0 ~ 30 fm Strong screening Binding only to high-z elements (Z > Z min ) Above tungsten (Z=74) m = 1 TeV ε = 5.10-4 DAMA: NaI(Tl) crystal Binding to thallium (Z=81) dopant present at the 10-3 level 9/11

Binding to very heavy elements DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation: R ~ 0.04 cpd/kg Requires small values of a 0 ~ 30 fm Strong screening Binding only to high-z elements (Z > Z min ) Above tungsten (Z=74) m = 1 TeV ε = 5.10-4 DAMA: NaI(Tl) crystal Binding to thallium (Z=81) dopant present at the 10-3 level Elastic collisions in crust (silicon Z=14) 9/11

Binding to very heavy elements DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation: R ~ 0.04 cpd/kg Requires small values of a 0 ~ 30 fm Strong screening Binding only to high-z elements (Z > Z min ) Above tungsten (Z=74) m = 1 TeV ε = 5.10-4 DAMA: NaI(Tl) crystal Binding to thallium (Z=81) dopant present at the 10-3 level Elastic collisions in crust (silicon Z=14) Only pay attention to lead (Z=82) in crust and shieldings 9/11

Binding to very heavy elements DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation: R ~ 0.04 cpd/kg Requires small values of a 0 ~ 30 fm Strong screening Binding only to high-z elements (Z > Z min ) Above tungsten (Z=74) m = 1 TeV ε = 5.10-4 DAMA: NaI(Tl) crystal Binding to thallium (Z=81) dopant present at the 10-3 level Elastic collisions in crust (silicon Z=14) Only pay attention to lead (Z=82) in crust and shieldings No bound state with germanium, xenon Consistent with CDMS-II/Ge, supercdms, XENON100, LUX (CoGeNT, CDMS-II/Si) 9/11

Results DAMA modulation + constraints/requirements Limit from production of superheavy isotopes of heavy elements: m > 300 GeV 10/11

Conclusions Sub-dominant dark sector made of dark anti-atoms interacting with standard sector through electric milli-charges Thermalization in terrestrial crust before 1 km deep Formation of bound states with atoms of the active medium Binding only to heavy elements (Z > 74) Explains: DAMA, CDMS-II/Ge, supercdms, XENON100, LUX Does not explain (if signals actually present): CoGeNT, CDMS-II/Si Predictions: - one photon emitted below kev - emission of spectral lines - addition of high-z material (thallium, lead,...) will enhance the signal 11/11

Thank you!