Turn Performance of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle

Similar documents
Continuous Differentiation of Complex Systems Applied to a Hypersonic Vehicle

J. F. Driscoll. University of Michigan

Flight Mechanics of Ram-Scram Transition

Effect Of Inlet Performance And Starting Mach Number On The Design Of A Scramjet Engine

FLIGHT DYNAMICS. Robert F. Stengel. Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford

Interactions between Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems of Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicles

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING

Contents. Preface... xvii

CONTENTS Real chemistry e ects Scramjet operating envelope Problems

Hypersonic Vehicle (HSV) Modeling

Mechanics of Flight. Warren F. Phillips. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Second Year - Second Term ( ) Fluid Mechanics & Gas Dynamics

Missile Interceptor EXTROVERT ADVANCED CONCEPT EXPLORATION ADL P Ryan Donnan, Herman Ryals

Rapid Analysis of Scramjet and Linear Plug Nozzles

Aerothermoelastic Simulation of Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicles

DESIGN PROJECT REPORT: Longitudinal and lateral-directional stability augmentation of Boeing 747 for cruise flight condition.

Review of Fundamentals - Fluid Mechanics

ONE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR SCRAMJET AND RAMJET FLOWPATHS

AFRL MACCCS Review. Adaptive Control of the Generic Hypersonic Vehicle

High Speed Propulsion

Introduction to Flight Dynamics

Computational Analysis of Scramjet Inlet

Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

Jet Aircraft Propulsion Prof. Bhaskar Roy Prof A M Pradeep Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Lecture #AC 3. Aircraft Lateral Dynamics. Spiral, Roll, and Dutch Roll Modes

PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

Chapter 1 Lecture 2. Introduction 2. Topics. Chapter-1

STUDY OF AN AIR-BREATHING ENGINE FOR HYPERSONIC FLIGHT

The Role of Zero Dynamics in Aerospace Systems

Scramjet Engine Model MASIV: Role of Mixing, Chemistry and Wave Interactions

/ m U) β - r dr/dt=(n β / C) β+ (N r /C) r [8+8] (c) Effective angle of attack. [4+6+6]

AME 436. Energy and Propulsion. Lecture 15 Propulsion 5: Hypersonic propulsion

DESIGN AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC NOZZLE OF SHCRAMJET ENGINE

A New Method for Computing Performance of Choked Reacting Flows and Ram-to-Scram Transition

A Scramjet Engine Model Including Effects of Precombustion Shocks and Dissociation

Comparison of drag measurements of two axisymmetric scramjet models at Mach 6

Control- Oriented Model of a Hypersonic Vehicle (MASTRIM) - Containing an Integrated, Advanced Propulsion Sub- Model (MASIV)

Introduction to Flight

Lecture1: Characteristics of Hypersonic Atmosphere

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

ME 6139: High Speed Aerodynamics

Chapter 4 The Equations of Motion

Design Refinement and Modeling Methods for Highly-Integrated Hypersonic Vehicles

Applications Linear Control Design Techniques in Aircraft Control I

THE ability to estimate quickly the properties of a supersonic

Lecture AC-1. Aircraft Dynamics. Copy right 2003 by Jon at h an H ow

Technology of Rocket

Mech 6091 Flight Control System Course Project. Team Member: Bai, Jing Cui, Yi Wang, Xiaoli

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION AND CFD ANALYSIS OF A SCRAMJET ENGINE WITH DIFFERENT MACH NUMBERS

CFD ANALYSIS OF A SCRAMJET ENGINE WITH DIFFERENT MACH NUMBERS

Performance. 5. More Aerodynamic Considerations

ADVANCES in NATURAL and APPLIED SCIENCES

Flight Dynamics, Simulation, and Control

Q. 1 Q. 25 carry one mark each.

Drag Computation (1)

I. Introduction. external compression. supersonic flow. II. Design Criteria

Aerodynamics Simulation of Hypersonic Waverider Vehicle

Section 4.1: Introduction to Jet Propulsion. MAE Propulsion Systems II

Hypersonics Research Capabilities At the University of Michigan

An Overview on Dynamics and Controls Modelling of Hypersonic Vehicles

Preface. 2 Cable space accelerator 39

The Challenges of Hypersonic and Space. Flight. Charlie Muir

LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND TRIM OF AN ARIANE 5 FLY-BACK BOOSTER

Computer mechanization of six-degree of freedom flight equations

Ascent Phase Trajectory Optimization for a Hypersonic Vehicle Using Nonlinear Programming

Applied Thermodynamics - II

3. Write a detailed note on the following thrust vector control methods:

MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING. EMEC 426 Thermodynamics of Propulsion Systems. Spring 2017

Introduction to Atmospheric Flight. Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)

DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, IIT MADRAS M.Tech. Curriculum

April 15, 2011 Sample Quiz and Exam Questions D. A. Caughey Page 1 of 9

Separable warhead mathematical model of Supersonic & Hypersonic Re-entry Vehicles

Propulsion Thermodynamics

CHAPTER 1. Introduction

Jet Aircraft Propulsion Prof. Bhaskar Roy Prof. A M Pradeep Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Compressible Flow. Professor Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer Spacecraft Propulsion Specialist

Overall Performance Design of Ramjet for Combined Engine

Balance of Moments for Hypersonic Vehicles

Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Advanced Rocket Nozzle

What is the crack propagation rate for 7075-T6 aluminium alloy.

Modeling of a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

DEVELOPMENT OF A ONE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR SCRAMJET AND RAMJET FLOWPATHS

Modeling, Analysis, and Control of a Hypersonic Vehicle with. Significant Aero-Thermo-Elastic-Propulsion Interactions:

The Simulation of Wraparound Fins Aerodynamic Characteristics

Retrospective Cost Adaptive Thrust Control of a 1D scramjet with Mach Number Disturbance

Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP

AME 436. Energy and Propulsion. Lecture 11 Propulsion 1: Thrust and aircraft range

AN INITIAL DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR OPERATIONAL HYPERSONIC MILITARY AIRCRAFT

Lecture with Numerical Examples of Ramjet, Pulsejet and Scramjet

Aim. Unit abstract. Learning outcomes. QCF level: 6 Credit value: 15

Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations

Initial Trajectory and Atmospheric Effects

Stability and Control Analysis in Twin-Boom Vertical Stabilizer Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

Drag (2) Induced Drag Friction Drag Form Drag Wave Drag

Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction (SBLI) CFD research and applications. IIT Bombay, 15th May 2012

Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota Written Preliminary Examination: Control Systems Friday, April 9, 2010

Aerospace Engineering

CFD Simulation of Internal Flowfield of Dual-mode Scramjet

NAPC Numerical investigation of axisymmetric underexpanded supersonic jets. Pratikkumar Raje. Bijaylakshmi Saikia. Krishnendu Sinha 1

MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING. EMEC 426 Thermodynamics of Propulsion Systems. Spring 2018

Transcription:

Turn Performance of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle AIAA Aircraft Flight Mechanics Conference Derek J. Dalle, Sean M. Torrez, James F. Driscoll University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 4809 August 8, 0, AFM 0 /6

Why dual-mode ram/scram again? It s that or a rocket! Competition Space access: rocket High-speed, long-range: rocket with glide High-speed loiter:? Maximum practical Mach number is about Specific Impulse [s] 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000,000,000 Turbofan Turbofan with afterburner Ramjet Rocket 0 0 4 6 8 0 Mach Number Theoretical maximum Hydrogen fuel in air Theoretical maximum Hydrocarbon fuel in air For applications where we use lift, doubling the specific impulse is a big increase Wide range of applications Possibility of a large flight envelope, AFM 0 /6

for turning not required Some applications are just a great circle, like high-speed transport. Launch vehicles Either bring all the heavy scramjet equipment into orbit along with the payload (spaceplane) or (turn around and) fly the scramjet part back to the launch area. Military applications Out-and-back trajectories obviously require turning. Even circumnavigation requires some. Then what?, AFM 0 3/6

of engine and vehicle dynamics Energy added Compression Expansion AIR (fast) Air-breathing engine Compressor work AIR + PRODUCTS (faster), AFM 0 4/6

of engine and vehicle dynamics Energy added AIR (fast) compression Air-breathing engine expansion AIR + PRODUCTS (faster), AFM 0 4/6

MASIV/MAS vehicle framework 4 (documented) parameters Takes less than 5 seconds to run Builds vehicle around engine flowpath Two elevators and two rudders >> vehicle = build_vehicle(... 'elevator_span', 0.4,... 'H_combustor_fore', 0.66); >> show_vehicle(vehicle) >> z [m] 0 5 0 5 0 5 30 y [m] 0 5 0 5 x [m], AFM 0 5/6

Canonical engine flowpath 8 a b c d a 3a 4a 4b 5a 6a Several inlet ramps for compression efficiency Arbitrarily shaped, variable-area duct Fuel injection trough any number of ports Jet mixing in combustor with recombination and external expansion, AFM 0 6/6

SAMURI Supersonic Aerodynamic Method Using Riemann Interactions domain initial conditions: p, ρ, T, M physical geometry, AFM 0 7/6

SAMURI Supersonic Aerodynamic Method Using Riemann Interactions Mach wave shock, AFM 0 7/6

SAMURI Supersonic Aerodynamic Method Using Riemann Interactions Mach wave (continuation) 4 3 expansion fan shock (continuation), AFM 0 7/6

SAMURI Supersonic Aerodynamic Method Using Riemann Interactions 4 3 7 5 6 shock slip line shock expansion fan (continuation), AFM 0 7/6

SAMURI Supersonic Aerodynamic Method Using Riemann Interactions, AFM 0 7/6

Example SAMURI solutions A sample inlet solution (temperature in K) y [m] y [m] 0 3..4.6 0 4 6 8 0 4 x [m] 000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300.5.5 3 3.5 4 x [m], AFM 0 8/6

Example SAMURI solutions Comparison with CFD Solution from CFD++ Solution from SAMURI, AFM 0 9/6

Air Flame Progress Air Mean Contour Flame Progress D equations for temperature, pressure, etc. 3D averaged fuel mixing Fuel Turbulent flame Fuel Averaged turbulent flame Averaged, quasi-steady model Mixing based on jet centerline and spreading Crossflow information collapsed before integration Finite-rate chemistry based on flamelet modeling z Flame Centerline Flame upper boundary Flame lower boundary Lines along which flame properties are computed x, AFM 0 0/6

model Almost the same as the inlet y [m] 0 3 4 8 0 4 6 8 30 x [m] Temperature [K] 500 000 500 000 500, AFM 0 /6

with hypersonic vehicle Three-dimensional vehicle with triangular panels Propulsion flowpath modeled as two-dimensional Vehicle split into propulsive and non-propulsive parts Propulsive panels in red above Vehicle geometry build around engine Neglects 3D phenomena such as lateral spillage Angular velocity not accounted for in engine model, AFM 0 /6

Earth model Equations of motion z e y e x n z n y n Rotating, ellipsoidal Earth default (WGS84) Options for flat or spherical Earth Rotation can be turned on or off independently x e equator prime meridian Submodels Somigliana gravity model 976 standard atmosphere Optional temperature offset Optional wind and wind derivatives, AFM 0 3/6

Flight parameters and control variables State variables, x Position: L, λ, h Attitude: φ, θ, ψ Velocity: M, α, β Angular velocity: p, q, r Can use alternative inputs, such as flightpath angle and heading angle Can specify absolute velocity or wind-relative velocity ẋ = f a (x,u) Control variables, u Equivalence ratio: δ ER Elevators: δ CE, δ DE Rudders: δ CR, δ DR Cowl deflections: δ cx, δ cz, δ ca Fueling location: δ ff Auxilliary parameters, a Wind: w N, w E, w D Temperature offset: T Vehicle design, AFM 0 4/6

Vehicle trim Problem statement: Find x and u such that ẋ = f(x,u) where we pick the value of ẋ beforehand. Usually we want ẋ = 0., AFM 0 5/6

Vehicle trim Problem statement: Find x and u such that ẋ = f(x,u) where we pick the value of ẋ beforehand. Usually we want ẋ = 0. Independent variables and dependent variables We want to pick some of the state variables beforehand, but not all. [ ] T x ξ = T x υ = u Now ξ has independent variables, and υ has dependent variables., AFM 0 5/6

Vehicle trim Problem statement: Find x and u such that ẋ = f(x,u) where we pick the value of ẋ beforehand. Usually we want ẋ = 0. Independent variables and dependent variables We want to pick some of the state variables beforehand, but not all. [ ] T x ξ = T x υ = u Now ξ has independent variables, and υ has dependent variables. Implementation Solving for υ gives us a trim function. υ = g(ξ,ẋ), AFM 0 5/6

Vehicle trim Problem statement: Find x and u such that ẋ = f(x,u) where we pick the value of ẋ beforehand. Usually we want ẋ = 0. Independent variables and dependent variables We want to pick some of the state variables beforehand, but not all. [ ] T x ξ = T x υ = u Now ξ has independent variables, and υ has dependent variables. Implementation Technically that s only an equality constraint. min φ(ξ,υ) subject to υ = g(ξ,ẋ), AFM 0 5/6

High-speed turning flight Slightly altered load factor definition North East Down Normal definition (flat Earth equations of motion), AFM 0 6/6

High-speed turning flight Slightly altered load factor definition North East Down Altered definition (any other equations of motion), AFM 0 6/6

High-speed turning flight Slightly altered load factor definition North East Down Comparison, AFM 0 6/6

System linearization Mathematical concept Find a trimmed condition x = F( x,ū) Calculate the derivative F = F( x + h ie i,ū) F( x,ū) x i h j First-order Taylor series ẋ = F F x + x u u, AFM 0 7/6

System linearization Mathematical concept Find a trimmed condition x = F( x,ū) Calculate the derivative F = F( x + h ie i,ū) F( x,ū) x i h j First-order Taylor series ẋ = F F x + x u u Problem: jagged function Installed thrust coefficient 0.04 0.03 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.03 6 7 8 9 0 Mach number, AFM 0 7/6

System linearization Mathematical concept Find a trimmed condition x = F( x,ū) Calculate the derivative F = F( x + h ie i,ū) F( x,ū) x i h j First-order Taylor series Solution ẋ = F F x + x u u Problem: jagged function Installed thrust coefficient 0.04 0.03 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.03 6 7 8 9 0 Mach number Use a cloud of points around the trimmed condition to create an overdetermined system Use linear least squares to solve for the best-fitting plane Result is hopefully the derivative of the underlying function, AFM 0 7/6

Operating map Non-turning flight conditions h [km] h [km] 3 3 30 9 8 7 6 5 0.4 0.60.6 Equivalence ratio 0.4. 0.6 0.6.4..6.4.8 4 6 7 8 9 0 M 3 3 30 9 8 7 6 Elevator deflection angle [degrees] 0.4 0.60.6 0.4. 0.60.6.4..6.4.8 0.3 0.5 0. 0.5 0. 4 3 h [km] 3 3 30 9 8 7 6 5 0.4 0.60.6 Angle of attack [degrees] 0.4. 0.60.6.4..6.4.8 4 6 7 8 9 0 M 5 4 6 7 8 9 0 M, AFM 0 8/6.5.5 0.5 Calculate trim for a range of altitude and Mach number Example shown for half-fueled MAX- flying east at the equator Dotted lines show dynamic pressure in atmospheres 0

Operating map flight conditions: g-turn h [km] h [km] 0.4 0.60.6 0.4 0.60.6 Equivalence ratio Angle of attack [degrees] 3 3 3 3 5 30 30 4 9 0.6 9 8 8 3 7 0.4 7 6 6 5 0. 5 4 4 6 7 8 9 0 6 7 8 9 0 M M Elevator deflection angle [degrees] Roll angle [degrees] 3 3 3 3 3 65 30.5 30 64.5 9 9 64 8 8 7.5 7 63.5 6 6 63 5 0.5 5 6.5 4 4 6 7 8 9 0 6 7 8 9 0 M M, AFM 0 9/6 0.4. 0.4. 0.60.6.4..6.4.8 0.60.6.4..6.4.8 h [km] h [km] 0.4 0.60.6 0.4 0.60.6 0.4 0.4.. 0.60.6.4..6.4.8 0.6 0.6.4..6.4.8

4 Operating map This time holding dynamic pressure constant at atm.8 Equivalence ratio 0. 0.5 0.3.8 Angle of attack [degrees].5 n [g].6.4. 0.5 6 7 8 9 0 M.8 Elevator deflection angle [degrees] 3.5 3.5.5 0.5 n [g].6.4. 0.5 0 6 7 8 9 0 M.8 Roll angle [degrees] 60 n [g].6.4. 4.5 0 0 0 0 6 7 8 9 0 6 7 8 9 0 M M, AFM 0 0/6 n [g].6.4. 50 40 30 0 0

Pole/zero plots Mach 8 flight, L = 0, h = 6km, σ = 90, n = Longitudinal dynamics Lateral-directional dynamics 0.05 6 4 Imaginary part 0 Imaginary part 0 4 0.05 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 Real part 6 4 0 4 Real part Above example for M = 8, h = 6km, no turning Can be calculated for any flight condition Consistent with expected behavior, AFM 0 /6

Pole/zero plots Mach 8 flight, L = 0, h = 6km, σ = 90, n = Imaginary part 0. 0.05 0 0.05 Longitudinal dynamics Imaginary part 0.5 0 0.5 Lateral-directional dynamics 0. 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 Real part 5 0 5 Real part Above example for M = 8, h = 6km, g-turn Can be calculated for any flight condition Differs from non-turning condition, AFM 0 /6

Primary The vehicle can turn. We can generate operating maps., AFM 0 3/6

Primary The vehicle can turn. We can generate operating maps. Other Development of a low-order vehicle model Stability substantially affected by amount of turning Effects of turning on operating map Verification of inlet design ideas, AFM 0 3/6

Acknowledgments This research was supported by U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory grant FA 8650-07--3744 for the Michigan Air Force Research Laboratory Collaborative Center for Control Science. Mike Bolender as technical monitor Scott G. V. Frendreis This research was completed as part of the Michigan/AFRL Collaborative Center for Control Science, AFM 0 4/6

Mode shapes and properties Mach 8 flight, L = 0, h = 6km, σ = 90, n = State variables: h, altitude; V, total velocity; α, angle of attack; β, sideslip angle; φ, roll angle; θ, pitch angle; ψ, yaw angle; p, q, r, angular velocity Short period mode Pole Time to double Variables.46 0.3 α, q.07 0.38 α, q Spiral mode Dutch-roll mode Pole Time to double Variables 3.87 β, r 3.83 β, r Roll mode Pole Time to double Variables 0.0036 9 φ Phugoid-altitude mode Pole Time to double Variables.5 p Pole Time to double Damping ratio Variables.8 0 3 45.6 h, V.49 0 4 ± 4.5 0 j 5.49 0 h, θ, AFM 0 5/6

Mode shapes and properties Mach 8 flight, L = 0, h = 6km, σ = 90, n = State variables: h, altitude; V, total velocity; α, angle of attack; β, sideslip angle; φ, roll angle; θ, pitch angle; ψ, yaw angle; p, q, r, angular velocity Short period mode Pole Damping Variables 0.35 ± 0.090j 0.97 α, q Spiral mode Pole Time to double Variables 0.36.93 φ Phugoid-altitude mode Dutch-roll mode Pole Time to double Variables 4. 0.7 β, r 4.5 0.7 β, r Roll mode Pole Time to double Variables.5 p Pole Time to double Damping ratio Variables.6 0 3 440 h, V.99 0 ± 3.5 0 j 0.49 h, θ, AFM 0 6/6