ON LOWER BOUNDS FOR THE DIMENSIONS OF PROJECTIVE MODULES FOR FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS. A.E. Zalesski

Similar documents
`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups

Modular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview

Endomorphism rings of permutation modules

A NOTE ON SPLITTING FIELDS OF REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE

arxiv: v3 [math.gr] 12 Nov 2014

Heights of characters and defect groups

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009

THE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

Decomposition Matrix of GL(n,q) and the Heisenberg algebra

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Modular Representation Theory of Endomorphism Rings

Modular representation theory

Characters and triangle generation of the simple Mathieu group M 11

Degree Graphs of Simple Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups

DUALITY, CENTRAL CHARACTERS, AND REAL-VALUED CHARACTERS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE

A Crash Course in Central Simple Algebras

Higher dimensional dynamical Mordell-Lang problems

LANDAU S THEOREM, FIELDS OF VALUES FOR CHARACTERS, AND SOLVABLE GROUPS arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 26 Jun 2015

NAVARRO VERTICES AND NORMAL SUBGROUPS IN GROUPS OF ODD ORDER

Anisotropic Groups over Arbitrary Fields* Ulf Rehmann Why anisotropic groups? 1888/9 Killing classifies semisimple groups and introduces the types A

Lifting to non-integral idempotents

SELF-EQUIVALENCES OF THE DERIVED CATEGORY OF BRAUER TREE ALGEBRAS WITH EXCEPTIONAL VERTEX

On a question of B.H. Neumann

Universität Kassel, Universitat de València, University of Copenhagen

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

Conjugacy Classes in Semisimple Algebraic Groups (Revisions)

294 Meinolf Geck In 1992, Lusztig [16] addressed this problem in the framework of his theory of character sheaves and its application to Kawanaka's th

ON BRAUER'S HEIGHT 0 CONJECTURE

CONJECTURES ON CHARACTER DEGREES FOR THE SIMPLE THOMPSON GROUP

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

arxiv:math/ v3 [math.qa] 16 Feb 2003

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

THE 7-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SPORADIC O NAN GROUP

CENTRALIZERS OF INVOLUTIONS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS

QUALIFYING EXAM IN ALGEBRA August 2011

Classifying Camina groups: A theorem of Dark and Scoppola

Group Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.

ON THE ORDERS OF AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF FINITE GROUPS

SIMPLE GROUPS ADMIT BEAUVILLE STRUCTURES

Maximal subgroups of exceptional groups: representing groups in groups

The Major Problems in Group Representation Theory

R E N D I C O N T I PRIME GRAPH COMPONENTS OF FINITE ALMOST SIMPLE GROUPS

Group Gradings on Finite Dimensional Lie Algebras

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Centralizers and the maximum size of the pairwise noncommuting elements in nite groups

ON THE CHIEF FACTORS OF PARABOLIC MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS OF NORMAL LIE TYPE

Centralizers of Finite Subgroups in Simple Locally Finite Groups

Absolutely indecomposable symmetric matrices

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012

INDECOMPOSABLE LIE ALGEBRAS WITH NONTRIVIAL LEVI DECOMPOSITION CANNOT HAVE FILIFORM RADICAL

Contents. Chapter 3. Local Rings and Varieties Rings of Germs of Holomorphic Functions Hilbert s Basis Theorem 39.

Algebras and regular subgroups. Marco Antonio Pellegrini. Ischia Group Theory Joint work with Chiara Tamburini

A NOTE ON RETRACTS AND LATTICES (AFTER D. J. SALTMAN)

Sylow structure of finite groups

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

Implications of the index of a fixed point subgroup

THREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

A MOD-p ARTIN-TATE CONJECTURE, AND GENERALIZED HERBRAND-RIBET. March 7, 2017

New York Journal of Mathematics New York J. Math. 5 (1999) 115{120. Explicit Local Heights Graham Everest Abstract. A new proof is given for the expli

ALGEBRA 11: Galois theory

On p-blocks of symmetric and alternating groups with all irreducible Brauer characters of prime power degree. Christine Bessenrodt

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY. p : E B such that there exist a countable open covering {U i } i I of B and homeomorphisms

Spherical varieties and arc spaces

Category O and its basic properties

The Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras

Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

Weyl group representations on zero weight spaces

ON SOME PARTITIONS OF A FLAG MANIFOLD. G. Lusztig

FIXED POINT SETS AND LEFSCHETZ MODULES. John Maginnis and Silvia Onofrei Department of Mathematics, Kansas State University

Lecture 20 FUNDAMENTAL Theorem of Finitely Generated Abelian Groups (FTFGAG)

Character values and decomposition matrices of symmetric groups

Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups

RECOLLECTION THE BRAUER CHARACTER TABLE

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

FOURIER COEFFICIENTS OF VECTOR-VALUED MODULAR FORMS OF DIMENSION 2

Notes on D 4 May 7, 2009

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

STATE OF THE ART OF THE OPEN PROBLEMS IN: MODULE THEORY. ENDOMORPHISM RINGS AND DIRECT SUM DECOMPOSITIONS IN SOME CLASSES OF MODULES

HEIGHT 0 CHARACTERS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

The Decomposability Problem for Torsion-Free Abelian Groups is Analytic-Complete

ON THE PLESKEN LIE ALGEBRA DEFINED OVER A FINITE FIELD

Character Theory and Group Rings

Subgroups of Linear Algebraic Groups

Isogeny invariance of the BSD conjecture

Algebra Questions. May 13, Groups 1. 2 Classification of Finite Groups 4. 3 Fields and Galois Theory 5. 4 Normal Forms 9

A GENERALISATION OF A THEOREM OF WIELANDT

ON AN INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OVER A FINITE FIELD. A. M. Vershik, S. V. Kerov

arxiv: v2 [math.co] 6 Oct 2016

Proof. We omit the proof of the case when f is the reduction of a characteristic zero eigenform (cf. Theorem 4.1 in [DS74]), so assume P (X) has disti

THEORY OF GROUP REPRESENTATIONS AND APPLICATIONS

ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF CLASS GROUPS OF NUMBER FIELDS

Fields of cohomological dimension 1 versus C 1 -fields

MATH 527, Topics in Representation Theory

Transcription:

ON LOWER BOUNDS FOR THE DIMENSIONS OF PROJECTIVE MODULES FOR FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS A.E. Zalesski Group rings and Young-Baxter equations Spa, Belgium, June 2017 1

Introduction Let G be a nite group and p a prime. Let F be an algebraically closed eld of char p > 0. Projective indecomposable F G-modules (PIM) are exactly indecomposable direct summands of the regular F G-module. These were introduced by Brauer and Nesbitt in 1940 and remain important objects of study in representation theory of nite groups. However, there are very poor information on their dimensions; an extremal version of the problem can be stated as follows: Problem 1. Given a nite group G and a prime p, determine the minimum dimension of a projective F G-module.

The absolute lower bound for the dimension of a PIM is G p, the p-part of the order of G. However, it could be wrong to expect that this bound attains for every group G. There are two well known cases where this is true: 1) G has a subgroup of index G p, in particular, G is p-solvable and 2) G is a Chevalley group (or more generally, a nite reductive group) in dening characteristic p. In fact, the majority of works in the area concern with the decomposition of the characters of projective modules in terms of ordinary irreducible characters, or with computation of decomposition numbers. The matter is that every PIM corresponds to a projective indecomposable K p G-module, where K p is the ring of integers of a suitable nite extension of Q p, the p-adic number eld. The character of this can be expressed in terms of irreducible characters of G. The coecients of this are called the decomposition numbers.

In particular, the dimension of a PIM can be expressed in terms of irreducible character degrees of G and the decomposition numbers. This hints that Problem 1 can be studied in the framework of ordinary character theory. The diculty is that no way is known to characterise PIMs in term of ordinary characters. However, as the character of a projective K p G- module vanishes at the p-singular elements, one can somehow ignore this diculty as follows. Denition. An ordinary (reducible) character is called quasi-projective (QP) if it vanishes at the p-singular elements. With this, one can replace Problem 1 by the following one which belongs to the ordinary character theory and is expected to be easier: Problem 2. Determine the minimum degree a QP character of G.

Quasi-projective characters A QP-character is called indecomposable if this is not of a sum of proper QP-characters. For groups with cyclic Sylow p-subgroups the indecomposable QP characters are classied in Willems-Z (J. Alg. 2015). In particular, Theorem 1. Let χ be an indecomposable QP character. Then χ = τ + σ, where τ is irreducible, and σ is either 0, or irreducible or the sum of all exceptional characters. In addition, every PIM character is indecomposable as a QP-character. In addition, the indecomposable QP characters have a nice description in terms of the Brauer tree.

Obviously, the restriction of a quasi-projective character χ to a Sylow p-subgroup of G is a multilple of the regular character, so χ(1) = l G p, where G p is the p-part of the order of G. We call l the level of χ. This is meaningful for projective characters as well. So G p is the absolute lower bound for the degree of a QP character. The natural problem is: Problem 3. Determine reducible quasi-projective (and projective) characters of level 1. This problem was addressed in a paper by Pellegrini-Z (2016), where it was solved for simple groups of Lie type G for p to be dening characteristic of G, except for types B 3 and D 4. These two exceptional cases are still open.

For simple groups Problem 3 was studied by Malle-Weigel (2008), Z. (2013), Pellegrini-Z (2016) and Malle-Z (in preparation). Technics developed there can be used for further progress. In addition, it becomes more clear what kind of diculties arise when dealing with QP characters in comparison with projective ones. To illustrate: Problem 4. Let G = G 1 G 2 be a direct product. Describe indecomposable QP characters in terms of those for G 1, G 2. At least, one cannot expect a simple answer available for projective indecomposable characters, which are the products of those for G 1 and G 2.

A less ambitious problem useful for some application is the following: Problem 5. Set G (n) = G G (n times). Suppose that G has no indecomposable QP character of level 1. Is it true that for every m > 0 there exists n such that the levels of all QP characters of G (n) exceed m? For some groups G this is true, and used to prove the following result (Malle-Z, in preparation).

Theorem 2. Let p > 2 be a prime and A n the alternating group. Then the minimum degree of a QP character of A n tends to the innity as n. This also implies a similar result for classical groups with p to be a cross characteristic, where the degree in question grows together with the rank n of the group. In constrast, this is not true for the natural characteristic of a classical group. Theorem 2 is shown to be failed for p = 2, however, the analogue of it for classical groups is valid for p = 2. Almost nothing is known for non-simple groups, except for p-solvable.

I mention the following result on groups of Lie type (Z, J. Alg. 2013): Theorem 3. Let G = P SL n (p m ), n > 4, and χ be a reducible projective character for the prime p. Then χ(1) (n 1) G p. This bound is sharp. The existence of a projective module of dimension n G p is well known, and for q = 2 there exists such a module of dimension (n 1) G 2. In addition, there exists a QP character of the above degree. I expect that this is projective. Theorem 3 is not probably true for QP characters. In the above paper a similar result is proved also for groups E n (p m ), n = 6, 7, 8, where the bound is shown to be n G p.

Malle-Z (in preparation) complete classication of QP characters of degree G p for G simple, except for p = 2 and G = A n. The list is too large to be exposed here. Some bibliography G. Malle and Th. Weigel, Finite groups with minimal 1-PIM, Manuscripta Math. 126 (2008), 315-332. G. Malle and A. Zalesski, In preparation M. Pellegrini and A. Zalesski, On characters of Chevalley groups vanishing at the non-semisimple elements, Intern. J. Algebra and Comput. Math. 26(2016), 789-841. M. Pellegrini and A. Zalesski, Irreducible characters of Chevalley groups constant on non-identity unipotent elements, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, Vol. 136(2016), 3550. W. Willems and A. Zalesski, Quasi-projective and quasiliftable characters, J. Algebra 442(2015), 548-559. A. Zalesski, Low dimensional projective indecomposable modules for Chevalley groups in dening characteristic, J. Algebra 377(2013), 125 156. A. Zalesski, Invariants of maximal tori and unipotent constituents of some quasi-projective characters for nite classical groups, ArXiv:1705.07179v1 [math.gr] 19 May 2017