Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #3

Similar documents
These warmup exercises do not need to be written up or turned in.

Problem 1. Characterizing Dedekind domains (64 points)

Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #6

x mv = 1, v v M K IxI v = 1,

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Problem Set #10 Due: 12/3/2013

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Problem Set #10 Due: 4/24/2015

Elliptic Curves Spring 2019 Problem Set #7 Due: 04/08/2019

6 Ideal norms and the Dedekind-Kummer theorem

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Problem Set #2 Due: 02/20/2015

5 Dedekind extensions

Elliptic Curves Spring 2013 Problem Set #5 Due: 03/19/2013

Some algebraic number theory and the reciprocity map

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

Galois theory (Part II)( ) Example Sheet 1

Graduate Preliminary Examination

Thus, the integral closure A i of A in F i is a finitely generated (and torsion-free) A-module. It is not a priori clear if the A i s are locally

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #7 09/26/2013

5 Dedekind extensions

Lemma 1.1. The field K embeds as a subfield of Q(ζ D ).

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOCAL FIELDS

ON GALOIS GROUPS OF ABELIAN EXTENSIONS OVER MAXIMAL CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS. Mamoru Asada. Introduction

Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013

IUPUI Qualifying Exam Abstract Algebra

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

24 Artin reciprocity in the unramified case

Part II Galois Theory

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012

Galois theory of fields

IDEAL CLASSES AND RELATIVE INTEGERS

7 Orders in Dedekind domains, primes in Galois extensions

Algebra Exam, Spring 2017

Galois Theory TCU Graduate Student Seminar George Gilbert October 2015

Attempt QUESTIONS 1 and 2, and THREE other questions. penalised if you attempt additional questions.

Algebraic number theory Revision exercises

Imaginary Quadratic Fields With Isomorphic Abelian Galois Groups

Math 553 Qualifying Exam. In this test, you may assume all theorems proved in the lectures. All other claims must be proved.

NOTES FOR DRAGOS: MATH 210 CLASS 12, THURS. FEB. 22

ON 3-CLASS GROUPS OF CERTAIN PURE CUBIC FIELDS. Frank Gerth III

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

1 Fields and vector spaces

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

Algebraic Structures Exam File Fall 2013 Exam #1

Johns Hopkins University, Department of Mathematics Abstract Algebra - Spring 2013 Midterm Exam Solution

Algebra Qualifying Exam, Fall 2018

On metacyclic extensions

ON TAMELY RAMIFIED IWASAWA MODULES FOR THE CYCLOTOMIC p -EXTENSION OF ABELIAN FIELDS

QUALIFYING EXAM IN ALGEBRA August 2011

An Additive Characterization of Fibers of Characters on F p

Part II Galois Theory

Algebraic number theory

GALOIS THEORY AT WORK: CONCRETE EXAMPLES

ALGEBRA 11: Galois theory

Galois groups with restricted ramification

Parvati Shastri. 2. Kummer Theory

Explicit Methods in Algebraic Number Theory

Continuing the pre/review of the simple (!?) case...

The Kronecker-Weber Theorem

Dirichlet s Theorem and Algebraic Number Fields. Pedro Sousa Vieira

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM SOLUTIONS October 20, 2011

Homework 4 Solutions

Math 6370: Algebraic Number Theory

Chain Complexes and Herbrand Quotients

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Lecture #7 02/26/2015

p-adic fields Chapter 7

REDUCTION OF ELLIPTIC CURVES OVER CERTAIN REAL QUADRATIC NUMBER FIELDS

15 Dirichlet s unit theorem

1 Number Fields Introduction Algebraic Numbers Algebraic Integers Algebraic Integers Modules over Z...

Quasi-reducible Polynomials

Section 18 Rings and fields

LECTURE 2. Hilbert Symbols

CLASS FIELD THEORY FOR NUMBER FIELDS AND COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM September 27, 2008

Math Topics in Algebra Course Notes: A Proof of Fermat s Last Theorem. Spring 2013

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

Algebra Qualifying Exam Solutions. Thomas Goller

A Harvard Sampler. Evan Chen. February 23, I crashed a few math classes at Harvard on February 21, Here are notes from the classes.

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #24 12/03/2013

The Kronecker-Weber Theorem

Name: Solutions Final Exam

FIELD THEORY. Contents

DISCRIMINANTS IN TOWERS

Quartic and D l Fields of Degree l with given Resolvent

Solutions of exercise sheet 11

8 Complete fields and valuation rings

Notes on p-divisible Groups

Norm Groups with Tame Ramification

x = π m (a 0 + a 1 π + a 2 π ) where a i R, a 0 = 0, m Z.

Raynaud on F -vector schemes and prolongation

Algebra Questions. May 13, Groups 1. 2 Classification of Finite Groups 4. 3 Fields and Galois Theory 5. 4 Normal Forms 9

18.312: Algebraic Combinatorics Lionel Levine. Lecture 22. Smith normal form of an integer matrix (linear algebra over Z).

Class Field Theory. Anna Haensch. Spring 2012

The Kummer Pairing. Alexander J. Barrios Purdue University. 12 September 2013

Galois Representations

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Problem Set #1 Due: 02/13/2015

Total 100

Lesson 2 The Unit Circle: A Rich Example for Gaining Perspective

MATH 113 FINAL EXAM December 14, 2012

Exercises MAT2200 spring 2014 Ark 5 Rings and fields and factorization of polynomials

Math 201C Homework. Edward Burkard. g 1 (u) v + f 2(u) g 2 (u) v2 + + f n(u) a 2,k u k v a 1,k u k v + k=0. k=0 d

GALOIS THEORY. Contents

Transcription:

18.785 Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #3 Description These problems are related to the material covered in Lectures 5-7. Your solutions are to be written up in latex and submitted as a pdf-file via e-mail to the instructor on the due date. Collaboration is permitted/encouraged, but you must identify your collaborators, and any references consulted other than the lecture notes. If there are none, write Sources consulted: none at the top of your problem set. The first person to spot each typo/error in the problem set or lecture notes will receive 1-5 points of extra credit. Instructions: First do the warm up problems, then pick any combination of problems 1 5 that sums to 99 points and write up your answers in latex. Finally, be sure to complete the survey problem 6. Problem 0. These are warm up problems that do not need to be written up or turned in. (a) Show that odd primes p split over Q( d) if and only if x 2 d splits in F p [x], but that this holds for p = 2 only when d 1 mod 4. Then show that for d 1 mod 4 using x 2 x + (1 d)/4 instead of x 2 d works for every prime p. (b) Let L/K be a finite Galois extension of number fields. Prove that if K has any inert primes then Gal(L/K) is cyclic (as we shall prove later, the converse holds). (c) Let L/K be a finite extension of number fields. Show that a prime of K splits completely in L if and only if it splits completely the normal closure of L/K. Problem 1. Factoring primes in cubic fields (33 points) Let K = Q( 3 5). (a) Prove that O K = Z[ 3 5]. (b) Factor the primes p = 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 in Q( 3 5). Write the prime ideals q appearing in your factorizations in the form (p, f( 3 5)) where f Z[x] has degree at most 2. (c) Prove that the factorization patterns you found in (b) represent every possible case; that is, every possible sum [K : Q] = q (p) e q f q that can arise for this particular field K. You should find that there is one numerically possible case that does not occur for p 13; you need to prove that it cannot occur for any prime p. (d) Find a different cubic field of the form K = Q( 3 n) for which the one factorization pattern missing from (c) does occur (demonstrate this explicitly). 1

Problem 2. Factoring primes in cyclotomic fields (33 points) Let l be a prime and let ζ l denote a primitive lth root of unity. (a) Prove that Q(ζ l )/Q is a Galois extension. (b) Prove that Z[ζ l ] is the ring of integers of Q(ζ l ). (c) For each prime p l, determine the number g p of primes q of Q(ζ l ) lying above (p), the ramification index e p and the residue field degree f p (your answer will depend on a relationship between p and l that you need to determine). (d) Do the same for p = l. Problem 3. Non-monogenic fields (33 points) Let A be a Dedekind domain with fraction field K, let L be a finite Galois extension of K, and let L 1, L 2 L be subfields of L that are Galois over K and generate L. (a) Let p be a prime of K and let D q be the decomposition group of a prime q above p. Prove that p splits completely in L if and only if D q is the trivial group. (b) Prove that if p splits completely in L 1 and L 2 then p splits completely in L. (c) Now assume A = Z, K = Q and that L 1 and L 2 are distinct quadratic extensions of Q in which 2 splits completely. Prove that O L Z[α] for any α O L. (d) Show there are infinitely many non-monogenic bi-quadratic fields L (you may assume Dirichlet s theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions) and give 3 examples. Problem 4. A relative extension without an integral basis (33 points) Let K be the quadratic field Q( 6) with ring of integers A = Z[ 6], let L := K( 3) be a quadratic extension, and let B be the integral closure of A in L (so AKLB holds). (a) Show that, as an A-module, B is generated by {1, 2, ζ 3 }, where ζ 3 = 1+ 3 2 ; conclude that B is a torsion-free finitely generated A-module. (b) Show that if B is a free A-module, then it is a free A-module of rank 2. (c) Show that if B is a free A-module of rank 2, then {1, ζ 3 } is an A-module basis for B (hint: show if {β 1, β 2 } is any A-module basis for B, then the matrix that expresses {1, ζ 3 } in terms of this basis is invertible). (d) Sho w that {1, ζ 3} is not an A-module basis for B by showing that you cannot write 2 in terms of this basis. Conclude that B is not a free A-module and that the ideal class group cl(a) := I A /P A is non-trivial. (e) Show that the A-module B is isomorphic to the A-module I 1 I 2, where I 1, I 2 I A are the fractional A-ideals I (ζ 3 ) and I 2 := 3 (3, 6). 1 := 1 2

Problem 5. Modules over Dedekind domains (66 points) Let us recall some terminology from commutative algebra. Let A be a ring and let M be an A-module. A splitting of a surjective A-module homomorphism ψ : N M is an A-module homomorphism φ: M N such that ψ φ = 1 M ; we then have N = φ(m) ker(ψ) M ker(ψ). We say that M is projective if every ψ : N M admits a splitting φ: M N. A torsion element m M satisfies am = 0 for some nonzero a A. If M consists entirely of torsion elements then it is a torsion module. If M has no nonzero torsion elements then it is torsion free. Note that the zero module is a torsion-free torsion module. Now let A be a Dedekind domain with fraction field K. (a) Prove that every finitely generated torsion A-module M is isomorphic to A/I 1 A/I n, for some nonzero ideals I 1,..., I n of A (you may use the structure theorem for modules over PIDs). (b) Prove that every fractional ideal of A is a projective A-module. (c) Prove that every finitely generated torsion-free A-module M is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of nonzero fractional ideals of A (elements of I A ). (d) Prove that every finitely generated A-module is isomorphic to the direct sum of a finitely generated torsion module and a finitely generated torsion-free module. (e) Show that if M is a finitely generated torsion-free A-module then M A K K n for some n Z 0. (f) Let M be a finitely generated torsion-free A-module, and let us fix an isomorphism ι: M A K K n that embeds M in K n via m ι(m 1). Let N be the A- submodule of K generated by the determinants of all n n matrices whose columns lie in M. Prove that N I A and that its ideal class (its image in the ideal class group cl(a) := I A /P A ) is independent of ι; this is the Steinitz class of M. (g) Prove that for any I 1,..., I n I A the Steinitz class of I 1 I n is the ideal class of the product I 1 I n. (h) Prove that two finite direct sums I 1 I m and J 1 J n of elements of I A are isomorphic as A-modules if and only if m = n and the ideal classes of I 1 I m and J 1 J n are equal. (i) Prove that infinite direct sums i=1 I i and j=1 J j of elements of I A are always isomorphic as A-modules. Problem 6. Survey (1 point) Complete the following survey by rating each problem you attempted on a scale of 1 to 10 according to how interesting you found it (1 = mind-numbing, 10 = mind-blowing ), and how difficult you found it (1 = trivial, 10 = brutal ). Also estimate the amount of time you spent on each problem to the nearest half hour. 3

Problem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3 Problem 4 Problem 5 Interest Difficulty Time Spent Please rate each of the following lectures that you attended, according to the quality of the material (1= useless, 10= fascinating ), the quality of the presentation (1= epic fail, 10= perfection ), the pace (1= way too slow, 10= way too fast, 5= just right ) and the novelty of the material to you (1= old hat, 10= all new ). Date Lecture Topic Material Presentation Pace Novelty 9/27 Ideal norms, Dedekind-Kummer 9/29 Primes in Galois extensions Please feel free to record any additional comments you have on the problem sets and the lectures, in particular, ways in which they might be improved. 4

MIT OpenCourseWare https://ocw.mit.edu 18.785 Number Theory I Fall 2016 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.