Barycentric coordinates

Similar documents
On the Circumcenters of Cevasix Configurations

On Emelyanov s Circle Theorem

SOME NEW THEOREMS IN PLANE GEOMETRY. In this article we will represent some ideas and a lot of new theorems in plane geometry.

Geometry. Class Examples (July 29) Paul Yiu. Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University. Summer 2014

Geometry JWR. Monday September 29, 2003

Construction of a Triangle from the Feet of Its Angle Bisectors

The circumcircle and the incircle

Cevian Projections of Inscribed Triangles and Generalized Wallace Lines

On Tripolars and Parabolas

A Quadrilateral Half-Turn Theorem

Isogonal Conjugates. Navneel Singhal October 9, Abstract

Pairs of Cocentroidal Inscribed and Circumscribed Triangles

Isotomic Inscribed Triangles and Their Residuals

XIII GEOMETRICAL OLYMPIAD IN HONOUR OF I.F.SHARYGIN The correspondence round. Solutions

arxiv: v1 [math.ho] 10 Feb 2018

Bicevian Tucker Circles

Three Natural Homoteties of The Nine-Point Circle

The Apollonius Circle and Related Triangle Centers

PARABOLAS AND FAMILIES OF CONVEX QUADRANGLES

A Note on the Barycentric Square Roots of Kiepert Perspectors

Chapter 14. Cevian nest theorem Trilinear pole and polar Trilinear polar of a point

Homogeneous Barycentric Coordinates

Conic Construction of a Triangle from the Feet of Its Angle Bisectors

Chapter 8. Feuerbach s theorem. 8.1 Distance between the circumcenter and orthocenter

Triangle Centers. Maria Nogin. (based on joint work with Larry Cusick)

Simple Proofs of Feuerbach s Theorem and Emelyanov s Theorem

The Kiepert Pencil of Kiepert Hyperbolas

Forum Geometricorum Volume 6 (2006) FORUM GEOM ISSN Simmons Conics. Bernard Gibert

Triangles III. Stewart s Theorem (1746) Stewart s Theorem (1746) 9/26/2011. Stewart s Theorem, Orthocenter, Euler Line

A MOST BASIC TRIAD OF PARABOLAS ASSOCIATED WITH A TRIANGLE

Isogonal Conjugacy Through a Fixed Point Theorem

Collinearity/Concurrence

Chapter 5. Menelaus theorem. 5.1 Menelaus theorem

Menelaus and Ceva theorems

The Lemoine Cubic and Its Generalizations

Collinearity of the First Trisection Points of Cevian Segments

Menelaus and Ceva theorems

Heptagonal Triangles and Their Companions

Chapter 2. The laws of sines and cosines. 2.1 The law of sines. Theorem 2.1 (The law of sines). Let R denote the circumradius of a triangle ABC.

The Apollonius Circle as a Tucker Circle

Parabola Conjugate to Rectangular Hyperbola

Chapter y. 8. n cd (x y) 14. (2a b) 15. (a) 3(x 2y) = 3x 3(2y) = 3x 6y. 16. (a)

The Isogonal Tripolar Conic

Advanced Euclidean Geometry

XIV GEOMETRICAL OLYMPIAD IN HONOUR OF I.F.SHARYGIN The correspondence round. Solutions

22 SAMPLE PROBLEMS WITH SOLUTIONS FROM 555 GEOMETRY PROBLEMS

Singapore International Mathematical Olympiad Training Problems

Classical Theorems in Plane Geometry 1

Hagge circles revisited

Affine Maps and Feuerbach s Theorem

INVERSION IN THE PLANE BERKELEY MATH CIRCLE

Vectors - Applications to Problem Solving

XI Geometrical Olympiad in honour of I.F.Sharygin Final round. Grade 8. First day. Solutions Ratmino, 2015, July 30.

The Menelaus and Ceva Theorems

Chapter 6. Basic triangle centers. 6.1 The Euler line The centroid

Geometry in the Complex Plane

Topic 2 [312 marks] The rectangle ABCD is inscribed in a circle. Sides [AD] and [AB] have lengths

The Cevian Simson Transformation

15.1 The power of a point with respect to a circle. , so that P = xa+(y +z)x. Applying Stewart s theorem in succession to triangles QAX, QBC.

Power Round: Geometry Revisited

XII Geometrical Olympiad in honour of I.F.Sharygin Final round. Solutions. First day. 8 grade

Geometry. Class Examples (July 10) Paul Yiu. Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University. Summer 2014

1. Matrices and Determinants

Synthetic foundations of cevian geometry, II: The center of the cevian conic

Survey of Geometry. Paul Yiu. Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University. Spring 2007

TRIANGLE CENTERS DEFINED BY QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS

Berkeley Math Circle, May

The Napoleon Configuration

Concurrency and Collinearity

A Distance Property of the Feuerbach Point and Its Extension

On the Feuerbach Triangle

Inversion in the Plane. Part II: Radical Axes 1

INTERSECTIONS OF LINES AND CIRCLES. Peter J. C. Moses and Clark Kimberling

Generalized Mandart Conics

SOME NEW THEOREMS IN PLANE GEOMETRY II

Nagel, Speiker, Napoleon, Torricelli. Centroid. Circumcenter 10/6/2011. MA 341 Topics in Geometry Lecture 17

Tucker cubics and Bicentric Cubics

Isogonal Conjugates in a Tetrahedron

How Pivotal Isocubics Intersect the Circumcircle

GEOMETRY OF KIEPERT AND GRINBERG MYAKISHEV HYPERBOLAS

Chapter 1. Theorems of Ceva and Menelaus

Square Wreaths Around Hexagons

Cubics Related to Coaxial Circles

Gergonne Meets Sangaku

Some Collinearities in the Heptagonal Triangle

Midcircles and the Arbelos

Geometry. Class Examples (July 3) Paul Yiu. Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University. Summer 2014

Generalized Archimedean Arbelos Twins

Another Proof of van Lamoen s Theorem and Its Converse

SMT Power Round Solutions : Poles and Polars

Notes on Barycentric Homogeneous Coordinates

Geometry. Class Examples (July 1) Paul Yiu. Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University. Summer 2014

Calgary Math Circles: Triangles, Concurrency and Quadrilaterals 1

1998 IMO Shortlist BM BN BA BC AB BC CD DE EF BC CA AE EF FD

Euclidean Spaces. Euclidean Spaces. Chapter 10 -S&B

A Note on Reflections

QUESTION BANK ON STRAIGHT LINE AND CIRCLE

Mathematics 2260H Geometry I: Euclidean geometry Trent University, Fall 2016 Solutions to the Quizzes

Conics Associated with a Cevian Nest

Constructing a Triangle from Two Vertices and the Symmedian Point

Transcription:

arycentric coordinates by Paris Pamfilos The artist finds a greater pleasure in painting than in having completed the picture. Seneca, Letter to Lucilius ontents 1 Preliminaries and definition 2 2 Traces, ratios, harmonic conjugation 3 3 Lines in barycentric coordinates 4 4 Menelaus in barycentrics 5 5 eva in barycentrics 6 6 Trilinear polar in barycentrics 6 7 Relation to cartesian coordinates, inner product 8 8 The circumcircle of in barycentrics 8 9 Displacement vectors, inner product, distance 9 10 Power of a point relative to a circle, general circle 10 11 Orthogonality of displacement vectors, onway symbols 10 12 Orthogonality of lines 11 13 Distance of a point from a line 12 14 Meaning of line coefficients 14 15 Medial line in barycentrics 15 16 entroid, Incenter, ircumcenter, Symmedian point 15 17 Euler line, Orthocenter, center of Euler s circle 16 18 Triangle rea in arycentrics 17 19 ircumcevian triangle of a point 18 20 ircle through three points 19 21 The associated affine transformation 20 22 Remarks on working with barycentrics 22

1 Preliminaries and definition 2 1 Preliminaries and definition In the subsequent discussion points {,,...} of the plane are identified with two dimensional vectors {(a 1, a 2 ), (b 1, b 2 )...}. Next properties are easily verified ([Ped90, p.30]): 1. Three points of the plane {,,} are collinear, if and only, there are three numbers {x, y, z} not all zero, such that x + y + cz = 0 and x + y + z = 0. 2. Let the points of the plane {,,} be non-collinear. Then, for every other point D of the plane there are unique numbers {x, y, z} with x + y + z = 1 and D = x + y + z. 3. For non-collinear points {,,} the point D, defined by the equation OD = x O + y O + z O, with arbitrary origin O and x + y + z = 1, (1) is independent of the choice of origin and depends only on {x, y, z}. 4. The numbers {x, y, z} with x + y + z = 1 expressing D in the previous equation are equal to the quotients of signed areas: E D O Figure 1: arycentric coordinates (x, y, z) of E x = rea(d) rea(), y = rea(d) rea(), z = rea(d) rea(). (2) Nr-1. If x + y + z = 0 and x + y + z = 0, then ( y z) + y + z = 0 y( ) + z( ) = 0 i.e. {,,} are collinear. For the converse, simply reverse the previous implications. Nr-2. Extend the two-dimensional vectors {(x, y)} to three dimensional {(x, y, 1)} and denote the corresponding space-points by {,,, D }. pply first nr-1 to see that {,, } are independent. Then express D in the basis {,, } to find the uniquely defined (x, y, z) as required. Nr-3. Using another point O for origin, the same equation and the analogous numbers (x, y, z ) to express D : O D = x O + y O + z O

2 Traces, ratios, harmonic conjugation 3 and substracting we get: OD O D = (x O + y O + z O) (x O + y O + z O ) = (x x ) + (y y ) + (z z ) (xo x O + yo y O + zo z O ) OO = O O = (x x ) + (y y ) + (z z ) (O O ) (x x ) + (y y ) + (z z ) = 0. y nr-1 this implies {(x x ) = 0, (y y ) = 0, (z z ) = 0}, as desired. Nr-4. Using the independence of (x, y, z) from the position of O we select O = D and use the relation x = 1 y z implying (1 y z)d + yd + zd = 0 D + y(d D) + z(d D) = 0 D = y() + z (). Multiplying externally by we get i D = z( ) z( ) = D. nalogous equations result also for y and x. Taking the positive orientation in the direction D we have the stated result. The numbers {x, y, z} in (2) are called absolute barycentric homogeneous coordinates of the point D, relative to the triangle. The multiples by a constant k 0 : (k x, k y, k z) are called barycentric homogeneous coordinates or barycentrics of the point D ([as93, p.64], [Yiu13, p.25], [Yiu00], [Mon17]). The signs of the numbers result from the orientations of the corresponding triangles e.g. if {D, } are on the same side of then x is positive. Otherwise it is negative and for D on it is zero x = 0. In fact x = 0 characterizes line. nalogous properties are valid also for y and z. Remark-1 Figure 1 shows a point E defined by an equation as in nr-3, but without the restriction s = x + y + z = 1. Point D is then obtained by dividing with s. Thus, the points are collinear with O and defined by the equations OE = xo + yo + zo and OD = x s O + y s O + z s O. 2 Traces, ratios, harmonic conjugation Varying x alone, moves D along a fixed line through. For x = 0, we get a point D = y + z on the line. Point D is called the trace of D on the side of the triangle. nalogously are defined the traces D and D. The oriented ratio r = D /D, calculated using y + z = 1, gives the value r = (z/y). Theorem 1. Given a point P = y + z on the line the harmonic conjugate of P w.r. (,) is P = y z. This follows from the expression of the ratio P/P = z/y and correspondingly for the conjugate P : P /P = z/y, from which follows that (P/P) : (P /P ) = 1. Remark-1 Since any line can be described in parametric form P = y + z and points

3 Lines in barycentric coordinates 4 D D D D Figure 2: Traces D, D, D of D on the sides of {,} can be complemented by a point non-collinear with {,} to a triangle of reference, the previous property is generally valid for any two points on a line. Remark-2 The centroid G of the triangle, i.e. the intersection-point of its medians, defines triangles {G, G, G } with equal areas. Thus it has barycentric homogeneous coordinates equal to (1, 1, 1). This identifies these coordinates with the projective homogeneous coordinates w.r. to the projective base {,,, G} with G the unit point (see file Projective coordinates). 3 Lines in barycentric coordinates The following facts concerning the representation of lines with barycentric coordinates are easily verifiable: 1. line ε is represented by an equation of the form ε : ax + by + cz = 0. (3) 2. The intersection point of line ε with the line ε : a x + b y + c z = 0 is given by the vector product of the vectors of the coefficients: ε ε = (bc cb, ca ac, ab ba ). (4) 3. The line at infinity is represented by the equation ε : x + y + z = 0. (5) 4. The point at infinity of the line ε : ax + by + cz = 0 i.e. its intersection with the line at infinity is given by ε ε = (b c, c a, a b). (6) 5. Two lines {ε, ε } are parallel if they meet at a point at infinity, hence their coefficients satisfy: bc cb + ca ac + ab ba = 0. (7) 6. The line passing through two given points {P(a, b, c), P (a, b, c )} has coefficients the coordinates of the vector product and can be expressed by a determinant: line PP : (bc cb, ca ac, ab ba a b c ), equation: a b c = 0. (8) x y z

4 Menelaus in barycentrics 5 7. The middle M of two points (a, b, c) and (a, b, c ) is found as the harmonic conjugate of the point at infinity of line. pplying the previous calculations it is found to be (the equality being for the tripples of coordinates) M = (a + b + c) + (a + b + c ). (9) 8. The line η parallel from (a, b, c) to the given line ε : a x + b y + c z = 0 is the line joining with the point at infinity of the line ε, which is (b c, c a, a b ). Thus the equation of this line is b c c a a b a b c x y z = 0, and the coefficients of this line, written in the form px + qy + rz = 0, are given by: (p, q,r) = (a + b + c)(a, b, c ) (aa + bb + cc )(1, 1, 1). (10) Thus, the line η can be written as a linear combination of the given line ε and the line at infinity ε, in the form η : (a + b + c)ε (aa + bb + cc )ε = 0 (11) η : (a + b + c)(a x + b y + c z) (aa + bb + cc )(x + y + z) = 0. (12) 4 Menelaus in barycentrics It is obvious, that the points {,, } on the sides of the triangle of reference are on a line px + qy + rz = 0, if and only if they can be written in the form: Their ratios satisfy then the equation: (0, r, q), (r, 0, p), ( q, p, 0). = 1. (13) This follows from the expression of the ratio D/D = z/y, for D = y + z, seen in z=0 y=0 px+qy+rz=0 '(-q,p,0) '(r,0,-p) '(0,-r,q) x=0 Figure 3: Menelaus theorem section 2. y this = r + q / = q/r etc. (See Figure 3). For another more conventional view of Menelaus theorem look at the file Menelaus.

5 eva in barycentrics 6 5 eva in barycentrics Three points {,, } on the sides of the triangle of reference are the traces of a point P(x, y, z) if and only if they can be written in the form: (0, y, z), (x, 0, z), (x, y, 0). (14) Their ratios on the triangle s sides satisfy then the equation: '(x,0,z) '(x,y,0) P(x,y,z) '(0,y,z) Figure 4: eva s theorem = 1. (15) s in the previous section, this follows from the expressions of the ratios = z y, P = x z, = y x. Multiplying the three ratios gives the value 1. The inverse is also obvious. If the product of the three ratios is 1, then {x, y, z} can be found such that {,, } have the shown coordinates. This defines uniquely P(x, y, z). For another more conventional view of eva s theorem look at the file eva. 6 Trilinear polar in barycentrics The trilinear polar or tripolar ε P of the point P w.r. to the triangle is the line containing the harmonic conjugates of the traces {,, } of P on the sides of : = (), = (), = (). That these three points {,, } are on a line follows by writing P = u + v + w. Then the traces are given by { = v + w, P = w + u, P = u + v}. y section 2 the harmonic conjugates of the traces are then { = v w, = w u, = u v} and satisfy + + = 0 showing that is on the line of. lternatively, the barycentrics of {,, } are respectively (0, v, w), ( u, 0, w), (u, v, 0), which up to a multiplicative factor can be writen in the form (0, 1/w, 1/v), ( 1/w, 0, 1/u), (1/v, 1/u, 0), implying that they are points of the line described by the next theorem:

6 Trilinear polar in barycentrics 7 '' trilinear polar of P '' '(u,v,0) P(u,v,w) '(u,0,w) '' '(0,v,w) Figure 5: Trilinear polar of P Theorem 2. For every point P(u, v, w) of the plane, different from the vertices of the triangle of reference, the corresponding trilinear polar tr(p) is described by the equation: x u + y v + z w = 0. (16) onversely, every line ε : pu + qv + rw = 0 of the plane, not passing through a vertex of is the trilinear polar tr(p) of the point ( 1 P p, 1 q, 1 ), (17) r which is called tripole of the line ε. Remark-1 The map P tr(p) is one-to-one for all points of the plane except those lying on the side-lines of the triangle of reference. For these points P, if they are different from a vertex and lie on a side-line ε, the corresponding line tr(p) coincides with ε. For the vertices of the trilinear polar cannot be uniquely defined. D' ε P tr(p) D Figure 6: Trilinear polars for P ε pass all through D Remark-2 Using the definition of the trilinear polar, it is easy to see, that for the points P of a line ε passing through a vertex, say, of the triangle of reference, the corresponding trilinear polar tr(p) passes through the harmonic conjugate point D = D(), where D = ε. s the point P approaches, the corresponding trilinear polar tr(p) tends to coincide with the harmonic conjugate line D of D w.r. to the line-pair (, ). Remark-3 From its proper definition follows that the trilinear polar of the centroid with equation ε : u + v + w = 0,

7 Relation to cartesian coordinates, inner product 8 is the line at infinity of the plane. 7 Relation to cartesian coordinates, inner product Denoting by (x, y) the cartesian coordinates and by (u, v, w) the absolute barycentrics of the same point P, the relation between the two is expressed in matrix form by translating equation 1: x y = M u v 1 w = 1 1 1 2 2 2 u v. (18) 1 1 1 w This can be used to express other geometric objects through relations of the barycentrics. For example the equation of a line, which in cartesian coordinates is translates into barycentrics to the equation ax + by + c = (a, b, c) x y = 0 1 a u + b v + c w = 0 with (a, b, c ) = (a, b, c) M. The inner product in cartesian coordinates is also expressible through a bilinear form : The matrix M t M is easily seen to be x xx + yy = (x, y, 1) y 1 = (u, v, w)m t M v 1. (19) 1 w M t M = 2 2 + 1 1 1 1 1 1. (20) 2 1 1 1 Taking into account that u + v + w = u + v + w = 1, we find that u xx + yy = (u, v, w)n v, with N = 2 2. (21) w 2 8 The circumcircle of in barycentrics y the discussion in section 1 we can take the origin of cartesian coordinates anywhere we like. Selecting it at the circumcenter O of the circumcircle of the triangle of reference, we find that u 2 = 2 = 2 = R 2, = R 2 cos(2γ), = R 2 cos(2β), = R 2 cos(2α), where {α, β, γ} the angles of the triangle opposite respectively to {,, } and R is the circumradius of the triangle of reference. Setting cos(2γ) = 1 2 sin(γ) 2,... we find 1 1 1 0 sin(γ) 2 sin(β) 2 N = R 2 1 1 1 2R 2 sin(γ) 2 0 sin(α) 2 1 1 1 sin(β) 2 sin(α) 2 0

9 Displacement vectors, inner product, distance 9 N = R 2 N 1 1 1 1 1 2 N 2 = R 2 1 1 1 1 0 c 2 b 2 c 2 0 a 2, (22) 2 1 1 1 b 2 a 2 0 where {a =, b =, c = } the side lengths of the triangle. Taking into account the condition {u + v + w = 1,...} for absolute barycentric coordinates, we find that the expression of the inner product xx + yy in terms of the corresponding absolute barycentric coordinates: u v xx + yy = (u, v, w)n = R 2 1 w 2 (c2 (uv + u v) + b 2 (wu + w u) + a 2 (vw + v w)). (23) Having selected the center of coordinates at the circumcenter of, the equation of the circumcircle κ of in barycentric coordinates can be found from the corresponding equation in cartesian coordinates: R 2 = x 2 + y 2 = R 2 (c 2 uv + b 2 wu + a 2 vw) (24) a 2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv = 0. (25) 9 Displacement vectors, inner product, distance Displacement vectors are differences of absolute barycentric coordinates of two points (p, q,r) = (u, v, w) (u, v, w ). Since u + v + w = u + v + w = 1, they satisfy p + q + r = 0 and represent through their corresponding cartesian coordinate vectors, defined by equation (18), the usual displacement from one point to the other. The inner product of the corresponding cartesian coordinate vectors can be calculated using the same bilinear form (22). Thus, introducing the vectorial notation x = (x, y) and P = (p, q, r) for cartesian, respectively barycentric cordinates, and also denoting by x P = MP, we have: x PQ = x Q x P = M(Q P) = M PQ and from this, the expression of the usual inner product: x PQ x P Q = PQt N P Q = 1 2 (p, q,r) 0 c 2 b 2 c 2 0 a 2 q, b 2 a 2 0 r where we set PQ = Q P = (p, q,r) and P Q = Q P = (p, q,r ). Expanding this, we get: x PQ x P Q = 1 2 [a2 (qr + q r) + b 2 (rp + r p) + c 2 (pq + p q)]. (26) This expresses the fundamental relation allowing the computation of euclidean distances and angles in terms of barycentric coordinates. Thus, for example, the distance of two points represented in absolute barycentric coordinates {P, Q} can be expressed through their displacement vector PQ = (p, q,r) and the formula: PQ 2 = a 2 qr b 2 rp c 2 pq. (27) p

10 Power of a point relative to a circle, general circle 10 10 Power of a point relative to a circle, general circle The expression in barycentrics of the power of a point P(u, v, w) relative to a circle, can be found from the corresponding expression in cartesian coordinates. In fact, in cartesian coordinates the power of the point P w.r. to the circle κ(o,r) is PO 2 r 2, which, using equation (27) for the respective absolute barycentrics {O(u 0, v 0, w 0 ), P(u, v, w)} becomes: (PO 2 r 2 ) = a 2 (v 0 v)(w 0 w) + b 2 (u 0 u)(w 0 w) + c 2 (u 0 u)(v 0 v) + r 2. The equation of the circle κ(o,r) results by equating this to zero: a 2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv +a 2 v 0 w 0 + b 2 u 0 w 0 + c 2 u 0 v 0 + r 2 a 2 (v 0 w + vw 0 ) b 2 (w 0 u + wu 0 ) c 2 (u 0 v + uv 0 ) = 0. (28) Taking into account that u + v + w = 1, the two last rows are seen to sum into the linear term: (r 2 O 2 )u + (r 2 O 2 )v + (r 2 O 2 )w. (29) Thus the equation of the circle κ(o,r) becomes a 2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv + (r 2 O 2 )u + (r 2 O 2 )v + (r 2 O 2 )w = 0, which represents the equation of the circle κ as a sum of the corresponding expression of the circumcircle of the triangle of reference and a certain line. Thus, the difference of the expressions of the two circles is the expression of the radical line of the two circles and the following theorem is valid. Theorem 3. The equation (r 2 O 2 )u + (r 2 O 2 )v + (r 2 O 2 )w = 0 (30) represents the radical axis of the circle κ(o,r) and the circumcircle κ 0 of the triangle of reference. The expression of the equation of the general circle in absolute barycentric coordinates is the sum the corresponding expressions of κ 0 and this line: κ(o,r) : a 2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv + (r 2 O 2 )u + (r 2 O 2 )v + (r 2 O 2 )w = 0. (31) Remark-1 The previous equation can be homogenized by multiplying with 1 = x + y + z, thus leading to the homogeneous equation: a 2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv + ((r 2 O 2 )u + (r 2 O 2 )v + (r 2 O 2 )w)(u + v + w) = 0. (32) 11 Orthogonality of displacement vectors, onway symbols lso the orthogonality of two displacement vectors {PQ, P Q } can be expressed equating the right side of equation (26) to zero. Thus, the detection of the displacements orthogonal to PQ = (p, q,r) amounts to the solution of the homogeneous linear system: } (b 2 r + c 2 q)p + (c 2 p + a 2 r)q + (a 2 q + b 2 p)r = 0, p + q + r (33) = 0,

12 Orthogonality of lines 11 leading to solutions (p, q,r ), which are constant multiples of the vector ( a 2 (q r) + p(b 2 c 2 ), b 2 (r p) + q(c 2 a 2 ), c 2 (p q) + r(a 2 b 2 ) ). (34) Introducing the onway symbols S = (b 2 + c 2 a 2 )/2, S = (c 2 + a 2 b 2 /2), S = (a 2 + b 2 c 2 )/2, where {a, b, c} are the side-lengths of the triangle of reference, and calculating the expression S pp + S qq + S rr, we find it to be a multiple p + q + r = 0, hence the theorem: Theorem 4. Two displacement vectors {(p, q,r), (p, q,r )} are orthogonal, if and only if they satisfy the equation: S pp + S qq + S rr = 0. (35) Remark-1 It is easy verifiable that the onway symbols satisfy the conditions: S + S = a 2, S + S = b 2, S + S = c 2, (36) S S + S S + S S = S 2, (37) S S + c 2 S = S S + a 2 S = S S + b 2 S = S 2. (38) a 2 S + b 2 S + c 2 S = 2S 2. (39) where S denotes twice the area of the triangle of reference ([Yiu13, p.33]). More general, for an angle of measure φ we can define the compatible to the previous symbol S φ = S cot(φ). (40) Since for a displacement vector we have p + q + r = 0, the equation (27), after a short computation, is seen to be equivalent with PQ 2 = S p 2 + S q 2 + S r 2. (41) More generally the inner product of two displacement vectors is also represented by the corresponding bilinear form, resulting from (26) for the displacement vectors PQ = (p, q,r), P Q = (p, q,r ) : PQ P Q = S pp + S qq + S rr. (42) 12 Orthogonality of lines The parametric form of a line represented in barycentrics by the equation can be given in the form pu + qv + rw = 0, (u, v, w) = (q, p, 0) + t(r q, p r, q p). The last vector on the right is a formal displacement vector, i.e. it satisfies the equation u + v + w = 0, and represents in barycentrics the direction of the line. Notice that it is also the point at infinity of that line, i.e. its intersection with the line at infinity, represented in barycentrics by the equation u + v + w = 0. Thus, two lines {pu + qv + rw = 0, p u + q v + r w = 0} are orthogonal, precisely when their directions (p d, q d, r d ) = (r q, p r, q p), (p d, q d, r d ) = (r q, p r, q p ) are orthogonal displacements, i.e. they satisfy equation (35). Doing the calculations, we arive at the theorem ([Lon91, II,p.57]):

13 Distance of a point from a line 12 Theorem 5. The lines ε : px + qy + rz = 0 and ε p x + q y + r z = 0 are orthogonal if and only if their coefficients satisfy the equation a 2 pp + b 2 qq + c 2 rr S (qr + q r) S (rp + r p) S (pq + p q) = 0. (43) Remark-1 The bilinear form involved in equation (43) is degenerate, since the corresponding matrix H satisfies: (1, 1, 1)H = (1, 1, 1) a 2 S S S b 2 S = 0. (44) S S c 2 Remark-2 Last equation conforms to the fact that if lines {ε = 0, ε = 0} are orthogonal the same is true for {ε + k ε, ε }, where ε is the line at infinity. y section 3-nr-5 the lines {ε + k ε = 0} represent, for variable k, all the parallels to line ε = 0. Remark-3 The expression in equation (43) contains the coefficients of the lines themselves. This in contrast to equation (35), which contains displacement vectors and could also be used to express the orthogonality of two lines, by considering their directions i.e. the displacement vectors {(p d, q d,r d ), (p d, q d,r d )}. 13 Distance of a point from a line Representing the coordinates by U = (u, v, w), the direction of the line is its intersection ε : f (U) = pu + qv + rw = 0 (45) (r q, p r, q p) (46) with the line at infinity as explained in section 12. The orthogonal direction to this can be calculated by equation (34) and leads to a multiple of the displacement vector V : (v 1 = S (p r) S (q p), v 2 = S (q p) S (r q), v 3 = S (r q) S (p r) ). Which in matrix form is represented by the equation: v 1 v 2 V = v 3 = 0 S S S 0 S r q p r. (47) S S 0 q p The line ε, passing through the point U 0 = (u 0, v 0, w 0 ), and orthogonal to ε has the U 0 U t ε Figure 7: alculate the distance U 0 U 1 in barycentrics parametric rerpesentation ε : U t = U 0 + tv.

13 Distance of a point from a line 13 Its intersection point U t with ε satisfies the equation of line ε : f (U 0 + tv) = 0 f (U 0 ) + t f (V) = 0 t = f (U 0) f (V). Taking into account equation (47), we find that f (V) = (p, q,r) 0 S S S 0 S r q p r = S (r q) 2 + S (p r) 2 + S (q p) 2. (48) S S 0 q p Thus, the displacement vector U t U 0 and its length is, according to equation (27): U t U 0 = f (U 0) f (V) V U t U 0 2 = f (U 0) 2 f (V) 2 ( a2 v 2 v 3 b 2 v 3 v 1 c 2 v 1 v 2 ). (49) The parenthesis on the right is V 2 = a 2 v 2 v 3 b 2 v 3 v 1 c 2 v 1 v 2 = 1 2 (v 1, v 2, v 3 ) 0 c 2 b 2 v 1 c 2 0 a 2 v 2, b 2 a 2 0 v 3 which, taking into account equation (47), leads to where K is the matrix V 2 = 1 r q (r q, p r, q p) K p r, (50) 2 q p K = 0 S S 0 c 2 b 2 0 S S S 0 S c 2 0 a 2 S 0 S. S S 0 b 2 a 2 0 S S 0 arrying out the computation we find that K = 2 a 2 S 2 S S S S S S S S S b 2 S 2 S S S. (51) S S S S S S c 2 S 2 This, using the relations in section 12 of the onway symbols becomes a 2 S 2 + S S S = S (S S a 2 S ) = S (S S (S + S )S ) = S (2S S (S S + S S + S S )) = 2S S S S S 2 a 2 S 2 = S S S S S 2. Thus, matrix K can be written in the form 1 1 1 S K 0 0 2 = S S S 1 1 1 S 2 0 S 0. (52) 1 1 1 0 0 S Introducing this into equation (50) we find that V 2 = S 2 (S (r q) 2 + S (p r) 2 + S (q p) 2 ). (53) This introduced to equation (49) leads finally to the expression for the distance of the point U 0 from the line ε : f (U) = pu + qv + rw = 0 :

14 Meaning of line coefficients 14 Theorem 6. The distance dist(u 0, ε) of the point U 0 from the line ε : f (U) = pu + qv + rw = 0 is given by the formula: dist(u 0, ε) 2 = U t U 0 2 = S 2 (pu 0 + qv 0 + rw 0 ) 2 S (r q) 2 + S (p r) 2 + S (q p) 2. (54) Measuring the distance dist(, ε) of the vertex (1, 0, 0) from the line ε and doing this also for the other vertices, we find the following property: Theorem 7. The coefficients of the line ε : pu + qv + rw = 0 are proportional to the distances of the vertices of the triangle of reference from the line: dist(, ε) 2 dist(, ε)2 dist(, ε)2 p 2 = q 2 = r 2 = S 2 S (r q) 2 + S (p r) 2 + S (q p) 2. (55) nother aspect of the ratio on the right is found by considering the normalized coefficients of the line, satisfying p + q + r = 1, and the centroid of the triangle G(1, 1, 1). These, replaced into equation (54), lead to: S (r q) 2 + S (p r) 2 + S (q p) 2 = 14 Meaning of line coefficients S 2 dist(g, ε) 2. (56) The meaning of line coefficients, expressed through equation (55), can be explained geometrically and more directly, than it was done in section 13, whose purpose was the general formula of distance of a point from a line, as described by equation (54). For this it suffices to use the results of section 4. In fact, the intersection points {,, } '(0,-r,q) pu+qv+rw=0 '(-q,p,0) '(-r,0,p) '' '' '' Figure 8: oefficients proportional to distances p = q = r of the line ε : pu + qv + rw = 0 with the sides triangle of reference (See Figure 8), have corresponding coordinates (0, r, q), ( r, 0, p), ( q, p, 0). nd the ratio of the distances {,, } is = = q r q =. r nalogously is seen that /q = /p. Notice that in order to have valid equations p = q =, r the distances must be signed and their signs must be properly chosen.

15 Medial line in barycentrics 15 15 Medial line in barycentrics The middle of a segment determined by two points (u, v, w) and (u, v, w ) is found by 3-nr-7 to be N = (u + v + w) + (u + v + w ). The line ε = is found by 3-nr-6 to have coefficients ε : (p, q,r) = = (vw v w, wu w u,uv u v). y 3-nr-9 a line with coefficients ε with coefficients ε : (p, q,r ) orthogonal to ε satisfies the equation involving the symmetric matrix H : (p, q,r )H p q = 0, (57) r Thus ε, seen as a tripple satisfying simultaneously ε (Mε t ) = 0 and ε N = 0, is (its coefficients) a multiple of the vector product ε = (εm) N. (58) short computation shows that this is equal to the vector consisting of the minors of the matrix: ( a 2 (3p s ε ) b 2 (3q s ε ) c 2 ) (3r s ε ) s u + s u s v + s v s w + s w where s X represents the sum of the coordinates of X and {a, b, c} are, as usual, the side-lengths of the triangle of reference. This vector product can be represented in the form ε = [diag(a 2, b 2, c 2 )(3ε s ε ε )] [s + s ], (59) where diag(a 2, b 2, c 2 ) is the diagonal matrix with these elements, and ε 0 is identified with the vector (1, 1, 1) representing the coefficients of the line at infinity. In this formula we can replace line ε with a parallel to it ε 0 for which s ε0 = 0, line ε 0 being defined by ε 0 = ε s ε 3 ε. (60) Making this modification the coefficients of the medial line of are given by ε = [diag(a 2, b 2, c 2 )ε 0 ] [s + s ]. (61) 16 entroid, Incenter, ircumcenter, Symmedian point These remarkable points are the simplest examples of triangle centers of the triangle of reference, whose barycentric coordinates can be easily calculated. The first, the centroid X 2 in the notation of Kimberling ([Kim18]), is the unit point of the projective base {,,,G} defining the barycentrics and has coordinates (1, 1, 1). The incenter X 1, using the definition of barycentrics through areas, is easily seen to be (a, b, c). The circumcenter X 3 of the triangle is also calculated using the area definition of barycentrics. In fact, the area of the triangle X 3 is (X 3 ) = 1 4 2 cot(α) =... = R 4abc a2 S X 3 = (a 2 S, b 2 S, c 2 S ),

17 Euler line, Orthocenter, center of Euler s circle 16 with corresponding absolute barycentrics: X 3 = 1 2S 2 (a2 S, b 2 S, c 2 S ). (62) The symmedian point X 6 (see file Symmedian) is characterized by its property to have distances from the sides analogous to these sides. Thus, the ratio of the areas (X 6 ) (X 6 ) = c2 b 2 X 6 = (a 2, b 2, c 2 ). The equalities X k = (u, v, w) for barycentrics must be understood in a wider sense and often is used the symbol X k = (u : v : w) to stress the fact that the barycentrics are defined up to multiplicative constants, so that only their relative ratios are uniquely defined. lternatively, we use also the symbol X (u, v, w). 17 Euler line, Orthocenter, center of Euler s circle Having the barycentrics {(1, 1, 1), (a 2 S, b 2 S, c 2 S )} of the centroid and the circumcenter, the Euler line, which passes through them, is easily seen (section 3) to have coefficients Euler line : (b 2 S c 2 S )u + (c 2 S a 2 S )v + (a 2 S b 2 S )w = 0. Its point at infinity X 30 calculated to be i.e. its intersection with the line at infinity u + v + w = 0 is then X 30 = (2a 2 S b 2 S c 2 S,... ) = ((2a 4 (b 2 + c 2 )a 2 (b 2 c 2 ) 2,... ), where the dots indicate the remaining coordinates resulting by cyclic permutations of the letters {a, b, c} and {,,}. On the Euler line are located some other triangle centers, like the orthocenter H or X 4 and the center of the Euler circle E or X 5. The barycentrics of κ H N G O Euler Figure 9: Points {H = X 4, N = X 5 } on the Euler line the orthocenter are easily found using the ratio rules of section 2 and the well known ratio HO/HG = 3/2 : H = 3 G 2 O = (1, 1, 1) 2 (a2 S,... ) s G s O s ( ) O = 1 2 a2 S 2S 2,... = 1 S 2 (S S,... ) (S S,... ) H = ( S S : S S : S S ).

18 Triangle rea in arycentrics 17 where s X is the sum of coordinates of X. nalogously are computed the barycentrics of the center N = X 5 of the Euler circle, which is the middle of the segment HO : N s O H + s H O = 2S 2 H + S 2 O ( S 2 + S S, S 2 + S S, S 2 + S S ). (63) Remark-1 The expression of the center N = X 5 (S 2 + S S,... ) as a linear combination of the centers {G, H} defining the Euler line generalizes for all notable triangle centers lying on that line, which can be also written as linear combinations X = ( m S 2 + n S S,... ). The coefficients {m, n} are called Shinagawa coefficients of the triangle center X ([Kim18]). 18 Triangle rea in arycentrics onsider the triangle of reference and a second one DE F, whose vertices have absolute barycentric coordinates w.r. to : D(d 1, d 2, d 3 ), E(e 1, e 2, e 3 ), F( f 1, f 2, f 3 ). The basic relations between barycentric and cartesian coordinates have been discussed in section 7. Denoting by (X 1, X 2 ) the cartesian coordinates of the points X of the plane and using equation (18), we obtain: D 1 E 1 F 1 D 2 E 2 F 2 = 1 1 1 d 1 e 1 f 1 2 2 2 d 2 e 2 f 2. (64) 1 1 1 1 1 1 d 3 e 3 f 3 Taking the determinants, we obtain the relation of the areas d 1 e 1 f 1 (DEF) = () d 2 e 2 f 2 d 3 e 3 f 3, (65) expressing the area (DE F) in terms of the absolute barycentrics of the vertices of the triangle. s an application, we can easily compute the area of the cevian triangle of a point P(x, y, z) (see figure 4). The traces of P on the sides of the triangle of reference are { (0, y, z), (x, 0, z), (x, y, 0)}. With a short calculation we find then ( () 0 x x ) = (y + z)(z + x)(x + y) y 0 y z z 0 = xyzs (y + z)(z + x)(x + y). (66) Some more effort in calculation is required for the pedal triangle of a point P(u, v, w) w.r. to the triangle of reference (See Figure 10). From the discussion in section 13 we can compute the coordinates of the points {,, } found to be: (0, a 2 v + us, a 2 w + us ), (b 2 u + vs, 0, b 2 w + vs ), (c 2 u + ws, c 2 v + ws, 0). Then, assuming the coordinates in normal form i.e. satisfying u + v + w = 1, and using equation (38), we find the crucial determinant 0 b 2 u + vs c 2 u + ws a 2 v + us 0 c 2 v + ws a 2 w + us b 2 w + vs 0 = S2 (a 2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv). (67) This, for general, not necessarily normal barycentric coordinates, implies the formula for the area ( ) of the pedal of the point P(u, v, w) w.r. to the triangle of reference: ( ) = S 3 2(u + v + w) 2 a2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv a 2 b 2 c 2. (68)

19 ircumcevian triangle of a point 18 ' P ' ' Figure 10: Pedal triangle of w.r. to P 19 ircumcevian triangle of a point Given a triangle and a point P the circumcevian triangle of P w.r. to is the triangle formed by the second intercepts {,, } of the cevians {P, P,P} of P with the circumcircle κ of (See Figure 11). The main property of the circumcevian ' '' '' ' P '' Figure 11: The circumcevian triangle of P w.r. to ' triangle is: Theorem 8. The circumcevian triangle of P is similar to the corresponding pedal triangle of P. Figure 11 shows the way to prove that the two triangles have the same angles. Returning to computations, the equations of the cevians are: : zv + yw = 0, : xw + zu = 0, : yu + xv = 0. (69) The points {,, } are calculated to be: = a 2 yz b 2 yz + c 2 y 2, = a 2 xz + c 2 x 2 b 2 xz, = a 2 xy + b 2 x 2 b 2 xy + a 2 y 2. (70) c 2 yz + b 2 z 2 c 2 xz + a 2 z 2 c 2 xy Their determinant is seen to be det(,, ) = (a 2 yz + b 2 zx + c 2 xy) 3. (71)

20 ircle through three points 19 The determination of the area ( ) requires the division with the product s s s of the sums of the coordinates of these points: s = (b 2 + c 2 a 2 )yz + b 2 z 2 + c 2 y 2 = S (y + z) 2 + S y 2 + S z 2, s = (c 2 + a 2 b 2 )zx + c 2 x 2 + a 2 z 2 = S (z + x) 2 + S z 2 + S x 2, s = (a 2 + b 2 c 2 )xy + a 2 y 2 + b 2 x 2 = S (x + y) 2 + S x 2 + S y 2. 20 ircle through three points The expression in barycentrics of the circle passing through three points {P i (u i, v i, w i )}, can be found from the corresponding expression in cartesian coordinates, using the transformation X i = MP i of section 7. In fact, using cartesian coordinates {X i = (x i, y i )}, the circle through these points is represented by the equation: X1 2 X2 2 X3 2 X 2 0 = x 1 x 2 x 3 x y 1 y 2 y 3 y 1 1 1 1 = X1 2 x 2 x 3 x y 2 y 3 y 1 1 1 x 1 x 3 x X2 2 y 1 y 3 y 1 1 1 + x 1 x 2 x X2 3 y 1 y 2 y 1 1 1 x 1 x 2 x 3 X2 y 1 y 2 y 3 1 1 1 = X1 2 MP 2, MP 3, MP X2 2 MP 1, MP 3, MP + X3 2 MP 1, MP 2, MP X 2 MP 1, MP 2, MP 3 ( ) = X1 2 P 2, P 3, P X2 2 P 1, P 3, P + X3 2 P 1, P 2, P X 2 P 1, P 2, P 3 M X 2 1 P 2, P 3, P + X 2 2 P 3, P 1, P + X 2 3 P 1, P 2, P X 2 P 1, P 2, P 3 = 0. (72) Here M denotes the determinant of the matrix M and P, Q, R denotes the determinant of the matrix of the columns of absolute barycentric coordinates vectors {P,Q, R}. y equation (23) the inner products are: X 2 i = R 2 (a 2 v i w i + b 2 w i u i + c 2 u i v i ). Replacing with this in equation (72), we see that the terms involving R 2 factor into P 2, P 3, P + P 3, P 1, P + P 1, P 2, P P 1, P 2, P 3 = 0, because this is the determinant of the matrix having two equal rows: 1 1 1 1 x 1 x 2 x 3 x y 1 y 2 y 3 y = 0. 1 1 1 1 From this follows that the circle through the three points is described by the equation: (a 2 v 1 w 1 + b 2 w 1 u 1 + c 2 u 1 v 1 ) P 2, P 3, P +(a 2 v 2 w 2 + b 2 w 2 u 2 + c 2 u 2 v 2 ) P 3, P 1, P +(a 2 v 3 w 3 + b 2 w 3 u 3 + c 2 u 3 v 3 ) P 1, P 2, P (a 2 vw + b 2 wu + c 2 uv) P 1, P 2, P 3 = 0. (73)

21 The associated affine transformation 20 Notice that the three first rows are the expressions of line equations, and the determinants { P 2, P 3, P = 0,...} represent respectively the side-lines of the triangle P 1 P 2 P 3. Since the expression in the last row is the one of the equation of the circumcircle of, the linear part of the first three rows represents the equation of the radical axis of the circle κ through the three points and the circumcircle κ 0 of the triangle of reference. Thus, we have the theorem Theorem 9. The equation (a 2 v 1 w 1 + b 2 w 1 u 1 + c 2 u 1 v 1 ) P 2, P 3, P +(a 2 v 2 w 2 + b 2 w 2 u 2 + c 2 u 2 v 2 ) P 3, P 1, P +(a 2 v 3 w 3 + b 2 w 3 u 3 + c 2 u 3 v 3 ) P 1, P 2, P = 0, (74) represents the radical axis of the circle κ through the three points {P 1, P 2, P 3 } expressed in absolute barycentrics and the circumcircle κ 0 of the triangle of reference. 21 The associated affine transformation Here we return in section 7 and the matrix M defining the transformation from barycentrics to cartesian coordinates. x y = M u v 1 w = The matrix M is invertible and its inverse is 1 1 1 2 2 2 u v. 1 1 1 w M 1 1 = 1 ( 2 2 ) + 1 ( 2 2 ) + 1 ( 2 2 ) 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 = 1 S 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1. (75) 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 The matrix M defines an invertible linear transformation L M (an isomorphism) of R 3 onto itself and the set of all absolute barycentrics satisfying u + v + w = 1 represents the plane ε of R 3, which is orthogonal to the vector (1, 1, 1) R 3 and passes through 1 the point 3 (1, 1, 1) R3. The image ε = L M (ε) is the plane of R 3 parallel to the (x, y) plane through the point z = 1. The linear transformation L M introduces by its restriction M = L M ε an affine transformation between the planes {ε, ε }: M : ε ε, with M(u, v, w) = (x, y, 1). It is interesting to see some consequences of this interpretation as, for example, the transformation of lines to lines, the preservation of ratios on lines and the preservation of quotiens of areas. These are general properties of the affine transformations but can be also deduced here directly for this special case. In fact, a line in ε is the intersection of ε with a plane through the origin η of R 3 : represented by an equation of the form η : pu + qv + rw = 0. The image-plane η = M(η) is found by writing the equation using matrix notation: pu + qv + rw = 0 0 = (p, q, v) u v = (p, q, v)m 1 M u v. w w

21 The associated affine transformation 21 Hence the image of the plane η is the plane represented by the equation η : p x + q y + r z = 0, where (p, q,r ) = (p, q,r)m 1, (76) and the line of the plane ε is the intersection ε η. In particular, the line at infinity of ε, represented through its intersection with the plane η : u + v + w = 0, maps to the line at infinity, which is the intersection of the plane ε with the plane with coefficients η : (1, 1, 1)M 1 = (0, 0, 1) i.e the plane z = 0. nother consequence of the affine property of the transformation M and its inverse is the preservation of ratios along lines. Thus, for two points {P,Q} of the plane and their line S(t) = (1 t)p + tq, with r = t t 1 the corresponding barycentrics satisfy the same relation: equal to the signed ratio: r = SP SQ, (77) S 1 (t) (1 t)p 1 + tq 1 M 1 S(t) = M 1 S 2 (t) = M 1 (1 t)p 2 + tq 2 = (1 t)(m 1 P) + t(m 1 Q). 1 1 t + t Notice that the function r = f (t) = t/(t 1) has inverse f 1 = f, so that given the ratio r = SP/SQ and taking t = r/(r 1), and seting {P,Q,...} for the corresponding barycentric vectors of the points {P,Q,...}, we have that S (t) = (1 t)p + tq S (r) = 1 1 r (P rq ), (78) satisfies precisely the relation SP/SQ = r. If the ratio r is expressed in the form r = m/n, then for the point S r satisfying this condition and the corresponding barycentrics vectors we obtain ([MP07]): S r P S r Q = r = m n S r = 1 n m (np mq ). (79) s an application, we prove the collinearity of the incenter I(a : b : c), centroid G(1 : 1 : 1) I G N Figure 12: The collinearity of {I, G, N} and Nagel point N(b + c a,...) (see file Nagel Point). The relation to verify is GN/GI = r = 2 t = r/(r 1) = 2/3. Thus, turning to absolute barycentrics by dividing the previous barycentrics vectors with s N = s I = a + b + c = 2s, we obtain: (1 t) N 2s + t I 2s = 1 6s (N + 2I) = 1 6s ((b + c a) + 2a,...) = 1 3 (1, 1, 1) = G. third property of the affine transformation M, already seen in section 18, is the multiplication of areas by a constant, in this case expressed through equation (65).

22 Remarks on working with barycentrics 22 22 Remarks on working with barycentrics The vectors of barycentric coordinates {U P,U Q,U R R 3 } representing the points of the plane {P,Q, R, R 2 } are not the points we see. What we see are the points of R 2. This is clearly understood in the case of the triangle of reference. The barycentricsvectors representing it are {(1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), (0, 0, 1)} and define the vertices of an equilateral triangle lying on the plane ε : u + v + w = 1 of R 3. The map L M of section 21 is the affine transformation mapping the equilateral onto. y means of it, all '(1,0,0) λ κ L M λ' κ' G G'(1,1,1)/3 0 '(0,1,0) ' 0 '(0,0,1) 1 ' 1 Figure 13: We see and work with properties of the triangle correspond to properties of the equilateral and vice versa. In particular, properties of the equilateral which are preserved by affine transformations map to similar properties of. characteristic example is the circumcircle κ of the equilateral, which carries also the symmetrics { 1, 1, 1 } of the vertices w.r. to the center G of the equilateral (See Figure 13). The map L M transforms G to the centroid G of and the circumcircle of to the Steiner outer ellipse κ of, characterized by the fact to pass through the vertices of and their symmetrics 1, 1, 1 w.r. to G, point G being its center. Similarly, L M maps the incircle λ of to the Steiner inner ellipse λ of the triangle, characterized by its tangency at the middles 0, 0, 0 of the sides of. The homothety of {κ, λ } with center G and ratio 2 : 1 translates to the homothety of {κ, λ} with center G and the same ratio. Invertible affine transformations or affinities like L M, besides the preservation of ratios along lines, map also areas σ to multiples kσ, with k a constant factor. This implies, that points P with barycentrics (u : v : w ) w.r. to map to corresponding points P = L M (P ) with the same barycentrics (u : v : w) = (u : v : w ) w.r. to. Thus, for example, the circumcircle of the equilateral with side a =, whose equation, according to section 8 is a 2 v w + a 2 w u + a 2 u v = 0 v w + w u + u v = 0, maps to the Steiner outer ellipse, which in barycentrics w.r. to must satisfy the same equation: vw + wu + uv = 0. (80) On the other hand, the incircle of the equilateral, which, according to section 10, is represented in barycentrics w.r. to by the equation a 2 (vw + wu + vw) a2 4 (u + v + w)2 = 0 u 2 + v 2 + w 2 2(vw + wu + uv) = 0,

ILIOGRPHY 23 maps to the Steiner inner ellipse, which in barycentrics w.r. to is represented by the same equation: u 2 + v 2 + w 2 2(vw + wu + uv) = 0. (81) ibliography [as93] John asey. treatise on the analytical geometry of the point, line, circle and conic sections. Hodges Figgis and o., Dublin, 1893. [Kim18] Klark Kimberling. Encyclopedia of Triangle enters, http://faculty.evansville.edu/. ck6/encyclopedia/et.html, 2018. [Lon91] S. Loney. The elements of coordinate geometry I, II. ITS publishers, Delhi, 1991. [Mon17] ngel Montesdeoca. Geometria metrica y proyectiva en el plano con coordenadas baricentricas. lgunos topicos. https://amontes.webs.ull.es/pdf/geoba.pdf, 2017. [MP07] Kimberling. Moses P. Intersections of lines and circles. Missouri J. Math. Sci, 19:176 187, 2007. [Ped90] D Pedoe. course of Geometry. Dover, New York, 1990. [Yiu00] [Yiu13] Paul Yiu. The uses of homogeneous barycentric coordinates in plane euclidean geometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31:569 578, 2000. Paul Yiu. Introduction to the Geometry of the Triangle. http://math.fau.edu/yiu/ Geometry.html, 2013.