Response curve measurement of the SiPM

Similar documents
Characterisation of Silicon Photomultipliers for the T2K Experiment

Calorimeter test-beam results with APDs

Test setup, APDs,, preamps Calibration procedure Gain monitoring with LED Beam test results Future R&D options

Functions Represent SiPM Response Especially Linear Behavior After Saturation

CALICE Test Beam Data and Hadronic Shower Models

Studies of Hadron Calorimeter

1 Introduction. KOPIO charged-particle vetos. K - RARE Meeting (Frascati) May Purpose of CPV: veto Kl

First Stage Analysis of the Energy Response and Resolution of the Scintillator ECAL in the Beam Test at FNAL, 2008

Construction of the CALICE High Granular Scintillator Based Electromagnetic Calorimeter Prototype and Its Response to Electrons

Experimental Particle Physics

Experimental Particle Physics

Development of Calibration system for AHCAL. Ivo Polak IP ASCR Prague ECFA Valencia

Development of a charged particle tracker with plastic scintillating ber and Geiger-mode avalanche photodiode

Time of Flight measurements with MCP-PMT

David Gascón. Daniel Peralta. Universitat de Barcelona, ECM department. E Diagonal 647 (Barcelona) IFAE, Universitat Aut onoma de Barcelona

7 Particle Identification. Detectors for Particle Physics Manfred Krammer Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna, Austria

Experimental Particle Physics

Simulation study of scintillatorbased

CALICE scintillator HCAL

Development of a High Precision Axial 3-D PET for Brain Imaging

PHOTODETECTORS AND SILICON PHOTO MULTIPLIER

Cherenkov Detector. Cosmic Rays Cherenkov Detector. Lodovico Lappetito. CherenkovDetector_ENG - 28/04/2016 Pag. 1

Scintillation Detectors Particle Detection via Luminescence. Kolanoski, Wermes

CHIPP Plenary Meeting University of Geneva, June 12, 2008 W. Lustermann on behalf of the AX PET Collaboration

LHCb Calorimetry Impact

Multi-Photon Time Resolution and Applications

First Stage Analysis of the Energy response and resolution of the Scintillator ECAL in the Beam Test at FNAL, 2008

A gas-filled calorimeter for high intensity beam environments

K2K and T2K experiments

The AMS-02 Anticoincidence Counter

Time-of-Flight PET using Cherenkov Photons Produced in PbF 2

Neutron Induced Nuclear Counter Effect in Hamamatsu Silicon APDs and PIN Diodes

Prospects for achieving < 100 ps FWHM coincidence resolving time in time-of-flight PET

Radiation Detector 2016/17 (SPA6309)

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

Efficiency of Solid State Photomultipliers in Photon Number Resolution

Study of timing properties of Silicon Photomultiliers

Time of Flight Technique

Correlation Matrix Method for Pb/Scint Sampling Calorimeter

Using new digital SiPM from Philips with AX-PET a new geometrical concept for PET

Scintillation Detectors Particle Detection via Luminescence

7th International Conference on New Developments In Photodetection

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Calibration and Monitoring Systems

ATLAS Hadronic Calorimeters 101

Forward Tagger Status

PoS(TIPP2014)033. Upgrade of MEG Liquid Xenon Calorimeter. Ryu SAWADA. ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

SCINTILLATORS AND WAVELENGTH SHIFTERS FOR THE DETECTION OF IONIZING RADIATION *

David B. Cassidy. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, USA. Varenna, July 09

Building IBMS Detectors for Muon g-2

New Results from the DREAM project

Development of Ring-Imaging Cherenkov Counter for Heavy Ions

Equalisation of the PMT response to charge particles for the Lucid detector of the ATLAS experiment

Searches for sterile neutrinos at the DANSS experiment. Dmitry Svirida for the DANSS Collaboration ITEP-JINR

Factors Affecting Detector Performance Goals and Alternative Photo-detectors

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

G-APD + plastic scintillator: fast timing in high magnetic fields

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Particle Identification of the LHCb detector

Mayneord-Phillips Summer School St Edmund Hall, University of Oxford July Proton decays to n, e +, ν

Detector Design Studies For High Precision Particle Physics Experiment

Characterization and Monte Carlo simulations for a CLYC detector

Kaon Identification at NA62. Institute of Physics Particle, Astroparticle, and Nuclear Physics groups Conference 2015

The LHCf experiment at LHC

Simulations for H.E.S.S.

High quantum efficiency S-20 photocathodes for photon counting applications

Beam diagnostics: Alignment of the beam to prevent for activation. Accelerator physics: using these sensitive particle detectors.

Upgrade of the CMS Forward Calorimetry

Hands on Project: Large Photocathode PMT Characterization

WbLS measurements at BNL

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Dec 2018 Fast Interaction Trigger for the upgrade of the ALICE experiment at CERN: design and performance

Digital Imaging Calorimetry for Precision Electromagnetic and Hadronic Interaction Measurements

What detectors measure

8 Calibration and Monitoring

The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511

PET. Technical aspects

Dario Barberis Evaluation of GEANT4 electromagnetic physics in ATLAS

THE main physics motivation for building the Compact

Status of the CALICE analog calorimeter technological prototypes

CALICE Si-W EM Calorimeter: Preliminary Results of the Testbeams 2006

TPC-like analysis for thermal neutron detection using a GEMdetector

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Scintillating Fibre and Radiation Damage Studies for the LHCb Upgrade

PHYS 3446 Lecture #12

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 8 Feb 2013

Precise Measurement of the Absolute Yield of Fluorescence Photons in Atmospheric Gases

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 17 Jun 2014

AIRFLY: Measurement of the Air Fluorescence induced by electrons

Fast Neutron Induced Nuclear Counter Effect in Hamamatsu Silicon PIN Diodes and APDs

PoS(PD07)020. Timing Properties of MCP-PMT. Kenji Inami. Nagoya university, Nagoya, Japan

Performance of the MCP-PMT for the Belle II TOP counter

Inorganic scintillators. Geometries and readout

SiPM & Plastic Scintillator

A method to measure transit time spread of photomultiplier tubes with Cherenkov light

Dario Barberis Evaluation of GEANT4 Electromagnetic and Hadronic Physics in ATLAS

NEXT ELECTROLUMINESCENCE READOUT

The First Large Application of MPPC: T2K Neutrino Beam Monitor INGRID

DELAYED COINCIDENCE METHOD FOR PICOSECOND LIFETIME MEASUREMENTS

Development of a Fiber Continuity and Light Calibration Device for NOνA

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 17 Dec 2015

John Ellison University of California, Riverside. Quarknet 2008 at UCR

Transcription:

Response curve measurement of the SiPM The theoritical formula : N Fired = N pix. (1 (1 1/N pix ) Npe ) does not hold because: 1) crosstalk and afterpulses increases N Fired (by a factor 1 / (1 ε) for N pix = ) 2) illumination is not uniform 3) pixels can trigger several times Spatial distribution of photons on the SiPM surface (From Lesya's simulation) Satoru Uozumi, Study and Development of Multi Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Readout, International workshop on new photon-detectors PD07

Setup to measure the SiPM response curve LED emitting at 450nm (λ scintillator = 425nm) Pulse width 5 ns SiPM reading the WLS fiber WLS fiber (green) embeded in a piece of scintillator PMT (XP2020Q) N pe = Q PMT x n / (Q PMT for n fired pixels on the SiPM ) (Where n ~ 50) N Fired = Q SiPM / Q SiPM for 1 pe

How big is the recovery effect on the SiPM response curve? Remark: The number of photo electrons coted on the X axis is N pe, including crosstalk and afterpulses. (N pe / (1 ε), with ε = 0.22 at U=2.5 V)

How optimize the linearity? Spread the light on all the pixels Make the illumination homogeneuous Spread the light in time (slow scintillator: 230 ns decay time)

Insertion of a diffusor (tracing paper) between the fiber and the SiPM

SiPM response curve for a full illumination With a long recovery time, the SiPM should saturate at : 3136 fired pixels (without afterpulses) Remark: The number of photo electrons coted on the X axis is N pe, including crosstalk and afterpulses. (N pe / (1 ε), with ε = 0.22 at U=2.5 V)

Dependence of the response curve on the temperature A strong dependence of the recovery time on the temperature has been mentionned (*) : at 0 C, 190 µs and at 22 C, 98 µs. The reason was the increase of the resistivity of the polysilicon quenching resistors. With our SiPM, no significant dependence on the temperature is observed (*) I. Britvitch, D. Renker, Measurements of the recovery time of Geiger-mode avalance photodiodes, NIMA, vol 567 (2006), p260

Dependence of the response curve on the position SiPM 6, 42, 78 cm LED Aluminium mirror Small dependence on the position Duration for back and forth travel: T = d / v = 2 x 0.8m / (3 x 10 8 x 1.6) = 8 ns

Proposal Readout on both sides (preferably with VA64: peaking time max ~400 ns and only 1 gain) Slow scintillator to make linear the response up to 2000 pe Use thicker scintillator plate: 5 mm instead of 3 mm to compensate for the lower LY of the slow scintillator (30% less). Three calibration methods: MIP + momentum info from the tracker + beam

Proposal for the injection of light Eventualy, the light could be monitored with an APD? LED Plexiglas to distribute the light

Annex

convolution Shape of the light pulse reaching the SiPM surface Light production with Scintillator or LED + Emission of the WLS fiber: decay time of 8.8 ns (*) Illumination with LED should well reproduce the illumination produced by a shower (*) The WLS Fiber Time Properties Study, LHCb 2000-39 HCAL

Extraction of the shape of the LED light pulse PMT response for 1 pe (fitted with a Landau) PMT response for a direct LED illumination (For both fit, there are two free parameters for time delay and amplitude) Gaussian shape for the LED light pulse shows good agreement with the measurement From the fit : FWHM = 4 ns

Extraction of the WLS fiber decay time from the PMT response to the fiber readout E - t / τ + + Gaussian LED emission WLS fiber PMT response for 1 pe Free parameters for the fit are: WLS decay time, time delay, amplitude WLS decay time = 5.7 ns (The decay time measured in (*) is 8.8 ns (*) The WLS Fiber Time Properties Study, LHCb 2000-39 HCAL

Photo peaks spectrum Calibration of the Spiroc 11 ADC ch / pe

Response curve of the SiPM (measured with the Spiroc) (Spiroc saturation occurs at ~2200 fired cells.) A possible interpretation if we neglect the pixel recovery: The response curve have two contributions 1) from pixels strongly illuminated (a ring?) ----> N Fired = N pix. (1 (1 1/N pix ) Npe ) 2) from pixels lightly illuminated ---> linear response (22 % of the light is spread in this lightly illuminated region)