PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH

Similar documents
LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

t, H = 0, E = H E = 4πρ, H df = 0, δf = 4πJ.

Gravitation: Tensor Calculus

Metrics and Holonomy

Tensors, and differential forms - Lecture 2

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science School of Mathematics

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus

7 Curvature of a connection

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Mathematical Relativity, Spring 2017/18 Instituto Superior Técnico

1 First and second variational formulas for area

TENSORS AND DIFFERENTIAL FORMS

CALCULATING THE CURVATURE TENSOR FOR THE 3D GODEL-LIKE SPACETIMES

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

Tensors - Lecture 4. cos(β) sin(β) sin(β) cos(β) 0

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

4.7 The Levi-Civita connection and parallel transport

1.13 The Levi-Civita Tensor and Hodge Dualisation

Homogeneous Lorentzian structures on the generalized Heisenberg group

j=1 ωj k E j. (3.1) j=1 θj E j, (3.2)

1 Vector fields, flows and Lie derivatives

Notes on torsion. Arkadiusz Jadczyk. October 11, 2010

PAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Elements of differential geometry

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy

Integration of non linear conservation laws?

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Physics 236a assignment, Week 2:

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

Complete integrability of geodesic motion in Sasaki-Einstein toric spaces

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

Inequivalence of First and Second Order Formulations in D=2 Gravity Models 1

GLASGOW Paolo Lorenzoni

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

The Einstein-Hilbert type action on foliated metric-affine manifolds

The Matrix Representation of a Three-Dimensional Rotation Revisited

Gravity theory on Poisson manifold with R-flux

Let F be a foliation of dimension p and codimension q on a smooth manifold of dimension n.

Geometry of SpaceTime Einstein Theory. of Gravity. Max Camenzind CB Sept-2010-D5

Tensor Calculus, Part 2

Introduction to relativistic quantum mechanics

Differential Geometry of Surfaces

Noncommutative Spacetime Geometries

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions

Noncommutative geometry, quantum symmetries and quantum gravity II

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

New Geometric Formalism for Gravity Equation in Empty Space

Theory. V H Satheeshkumar. XXVII Texas Symposium, Dallas, TX December 8 13, 2013

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

d F = (df E 3 ) E 3. (4.1)

Physics/Astronomy 226, Problem set 4, Due 2/10 Solutions. Solution: Our vectors consist of components and basis vectors:

Differential Forms, Integration on Manifolds, and Stokes Theorem

Lecture 4 - Lie Algebra Cohomology I

1 Normal (geodesic) coordinates

General tensors. Three definitions of the term V V. q times. A j 1...j p. k 1...k q

Orientation transport

Twist deformation quantization, gravity and Einstein spaces. Paolo Aschieri U.Piemonte Orientale, Alessandria

7 The cigar soliton, the Rosenau solution, and moving frame calculations

5.2 The Levi-Civita Connection on Surfaces. 1 Parallel transport of vector fields on a surface M

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Euler Characteristic of Two-Dimensional Manifolds

New Geometric Formalism for Gravity Equation in Empty Space

CS 468 (Spring 2013) Discrete Differential Geometry

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

Stationarity of non-radiating spacetimes

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 12 Jul 1994

LECTURE 5: SURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SPACE. 1. Projective space

X Y = (X Y j ) Y i (x) j (y) = y j. x i. j + Y i

Minimal timelike surfaces in a certain homogeneous Lorentzian 3-manifold II

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

Intrinsic Differential Geometry with Geometric Calculus

Fundamental Materials of Riemannian Geometry

Gravitational radiation

is the desired collar neighbourhood. Corollary Suppose M1 n, M 2 and f : N1 n 1 N2 n 1 is a diffeomorphism between some connected components

The Hodge Star Operator

Connection Variables in General Relativity

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Modern Cosmology Solutions 2: Relativistic Gravity

Gravitation: Special Relativity

Tensors and Special Relativity

Vectors, metric and the connection

ON THE GEOMETRY OF TANGENT BUNDLE OF A (PSEUDO-) RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLD

Perelman s Dilaton. Annibale Magni (TU-Dortmund) April 26, joint work with M. Caldarelli, G. Catino, Z. Djadly and C.

Survey on exterior algebra and differential forms

On homogeneous Randers spaces with Douglas or naturally reductive metrics

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

CLASSIFICATION OF MÖBIUS ISOPARAMETRIC HYPERSURFACES IN THE UNIT SIX-SPHERE

Notes for an Introduction to General Relativity. Fall 2011.

Cosmology. April 13, 2015

Higher dimensional Kerr-Schild spacetimes 1

CS 468. Differential Geometry for Computer Science. Lecture 13 Tensors and Exterior Calculus

Transcription:

PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH 1. Differential Forms To start our discussion, we will define a special class of type (0,r) tensors: Definition 1.1. A differential form of order r or an r-form is a totally antisymmetric tensor of type (0, r). Before, we built higher rank tensors out of covariant and contravariant vectors using the tensor product. In a similar way, a p-form will be decomposed into 1-forms using the wedge product. Definition 1.. The wedge product of r 1-forms is the totally anti-symmetric tensor product dx µ1 dx µ... dx µr = 1 sgn(p )dx µp (1) dx µp ()... dx µp (r) r! P S r we can easily show that the wedge product satisfies the following conditions: dx µ1 dx µ... dx µr = 0 if some index µ appears at least twice. dx µ1 dx µ... dx µr = sgn(p )dx µ P (1) dx µ P ()... dx µ P (r) dx µ1 dx µ... dx µr is linear in each dx µ. 1 Denoting the vector space of r-forms at p M by Ω r p(m), the set of r-forms forms a basis of Ω r p(m) and an element ω Ω r p(m) may be expressed as ω = 1 r! w µ 1µ...µ r dx µ1 dx µ... dx µr The dimension of Ω r p(m) is dimω r p = ( ) m r where m is the dimension of the manifold M. Due to this, the vector spaces Ω r p(m) and Ωp m r (M) are isomorphic since they have the same dimension. We can generalize the wedge product to an exterior product of a q-form and an r-form : Ω q p(m) Ω r p(m) Ω q+r p (M) Denoting ω Ω q p(m) and ζ Ω r p(m), the action of the q + r form ω ζ on q + r arbitrary vectors, V i T p M is [ω ζ](v 1,..., V q+r ) = 1 sgn(p )ω(v P (1),..., V P (q) )ζ(v P (q+1),..., V P (q+r) ) q!r! P S q+r Notice that if q + r > m then ω ζ vanishes automatically. There is one more operation we must define before we can discuss non-coordinate bases and the Cartan Structure equations. We must define the exterior derivative of an r-form. Definition 1.3. The exterior derivative d r is a map Ω r (M) Ω r+1 (M) whose action on an r-form ω = 1 r! ω µ 1,...µ r dx µ1 dx µ... dx µr is defined as d r ω = 1 ( ) r! x ν ω µ 1...µ r dx ν dx µ1 dx µ... dx µr. 1

PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH Without proof, we have three useful statements about the exterior derivative: For ζ Ω 1 (M) and ω Ω r (M) we have d(ζ ω) = dζ ω + ( 1) q ζ dω For X, Y T p (M) and ω Ω 1 (M), we have dω(x, Y ) = X(ω(Y )) Y (ω(x)) ω([x, Y ]). For an r-form ω Ω r (M) this becomes r dω(x 1,..., X r+1 ) = ( 1) i+1 X i ω(x 1,..., ˆX i,...x r+1 ) i=1 + i<j( 1) i+j ω([x i, X j ], X 1,..., ˆX i,..., ˆX j,..., X r+1 ) where a hatted quantity indicates it is being omitted. Defining the inner product i X Ω r (M) Ω r 1 (M) where X T p M, and ω Ω r (M) as i X ω(x 1,..., X r 1 ) = ω(x, X 1,..., X r 1 ) where X i T p M, i = 1,...r are arbitrary vectors. The Lie derivative of ω Ω 1 (M) in the direction of X is L X ω = (di X + i X d)ω Amazingly, there is no change in this formula for a general r-form ω Ω r (M) 1. Non-Coordinate Bases In this class we have worked in a coordinate basis, so that T p M was spanned by {e µ } = { } x and T µ p M spanned by {θ µ } = {dx µ }. There are alternative choices for our bases of these spaces, in particular if the manifold M is equipped with a metric g then we can consider the linear combinations e i = e µ i x µ, {e µ i } GL(m, R) with det e µ i > 0. We have a new frame of basis vectors {e i } obtained by a GL(m, R)-transformation of the original coordinate basis which preserves the orientation. To differentiate between the original coordinate basis and the noncoordinate basis, we will use the indices i, j, k, l [1, 4] when we discuss vectors represented in the new basis. We require that {e i } must be orthonormal with respect to g g(e i, e k ) = e µ i ej ν g µν = η ij If the metric was Riemannian then η ij would be replaced with δ ij. Using the inverse of e µ i which we will denote as e i µ this identity yields g µν = e i µe j νη ij A vector is independent of the basis chosen, so we have V = V µ e µ = V i e i = V i e µ i e µ 1 See Nakahara, section 5.8 Thus, we have e i µ ei ν = δµ ν and ei µ e µ j = δ i j.

PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH 3 and so, V µ = V i e µ i, V i = e i µv µ. If we introduce the dual basis {θ i } such that the inner product < θ i, e j >= δ i j, then θ i = e i µdx µ. We can express the metric in terms of {θ i } as g µν dx µ dx ν = δ ij θ i θ j {e i } and {θ i } are called non-coordinate bases The coefficients e µ i are called the veirbeins if the space is four dimensional, and vielbeins if it is n-dimensional with n > 4. Unlike the coordinate basis, the non-coordinate basis has non-vanishing Lie bracket, where c k Example.1. The metric on S is [e i, e j ] p = c k ij (p)e k P ij (p) = e k ν[e µ µ ej ν e µ µe ν ](p) i g = dθ + sin θdφ = (θ 1 ) + (θ ) where θ 1 = dθ and θ = sin θdφ. The zweibeins are e 1 θ = 1, e1 φ = 0, e θ = 0, e φ = sin θ. The non-vanishing components of c k ij are c 1 = c 1 = cot θ. 3. Cartan s Structure Equations The most common definitions for the curvature tensor R and the torsion tensor T are R(X, Y )Z = X Y Z Y X Z [X,Y ] Z T (X, Y ) = X Y Y X [X, Y ] Let {e i } and {θ i } be a non-coordinate basis and dual basis respectively, then the vector fields {e i } satisfy [e i, e j ] = cij ke k. We define connection coefficients with respect to the basis {e i } as i e j = ei e j = Γ k ije k Denoting the coordinate basis as {ê α }, we have e i = e µ i ê µ then this expression becomes from which it follows e µ i ( µ ej ν + ej λ Γ ν µλ)ê ν = Γ k ijek ν ê ν Γ k ij = e k νe µ i ( µ ej ν + ej λ Γ ν µλ) = e k νe µ i µ e ν j i j.

4 PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH The components of T and R in this basis are given by T i jk = < θ i, T (e j, e k ) >=< θ i, j e k k e j [e j, e k ] > = Γ i jk Γ i kj c i jk R i jkl = < θ i, k l e j l k e j [ek,e l ]e j > = < θ i, k (Γ l0 lj e l 0 l Γ l0 kj e l 0 ) c l0 kl l 0 e j > = e k [Γ i lj] e l [Γ i kj] + Γ l0 lj Γi kl 0 Γ l0 kj Γi ll 0 c l0 kl Γi l 0j To simplify the calculations we introduce a matrix-valued one-form ω i j called the connection one-form by ω i j = Γ i kjθ k. it may be shown that ω i j plays an important role in computing the curvature and torsion tensors 3 Theorem 3.1. The connection one-form ω i j satisfies Cartan s Structure Equations dθ i + ω i k θ j = T i dω i j + ω j k ωk j = R i j where T i = 1 T i jk θj θ k is the torsion two-form and R i j = 1 Ri jkl θk θ l is the curvature two form. Furthermore, the Bianchi identities follow by taking the exterior derivative of these equations dt i + ω i jt j = R i j θ j dr i j + ω i k R k j R i k ω k j = 0 4. The Local Frame In an m-dimensional Riemannian manifold the metric tensor g µν degrees of freedom, while the vielbein e µ i has m degrees of freedom. For a given metric, there are uncountably many non-coordinate bases which yield the same metric. Each of these bases are related to the other by the local orthogonal rotations θ i θ i (p) = Λ i j(p)θ j (p) at each point p. The vielbein transform as e i µ(p) = e a µ (p) = Λ i j(p)e j µ(p) has m(m+1) Remark 4.1. Unlike the indices µ, ν, λ,... which transform under coordinate changes, the indices i, j, k, l,... transform under the local orthogonal rotation and are inert under coordinate changes. Since the metric tensor is invariant under the rotation, Λ i j, we have Λ i jη il Λ l k = η jk 3 See Nakahara, section 7.8. for proof of theorem.

PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH 5 for any Lorentzian spacetime. Therefore Λ i j (p) SO(m 1, 1), the subset of the Lorentzian transformations with determinant 1. Treating this as a Lie group, it has dimension m(m 1) = m m(m + 1) which is the difference between the degrees of freedom of e µ i and g µν. Under the local frame rotation Λ i j (p) the indices i, j, k, l are rotated while the indices ν, µ, λ,... are not affected. Under the rotation, the basis vector transforms as e i e i = e j (Λ 1 ) j i With this rule, we see that upper non-coordinate indices are rotated by Λ i j while the lower indices are rotated by (Λ 1 ) i j Example 4.. Given a tensor field of type (1,1) we have t = t i j e iθ j in the new frame {e i } = {e j(λ 1 ) j i } and θ i } = {Λ i j θj } then t i j t i j = Λ i kt k l(λ 1 ) l j It should be clear that the torsion two-form and curvature two-form transform homogeneously due to this, i.e. T j Λ i j and i R k = Λ i k Rk l (Λ 1 ) l j. Using this we can determine the transformation rule for the connection oneform ω i j. Applying a frame transformation to the torsion tensor, and applying the identity dλλ 1 + ΛdΛ 1 = 0 we find ω i j = Λ i kω k l(λ 1 ) l j + Λ i k(dλ 1 ) k j 5. Levi-Civita Connection in a Non-Coordinate Basis Supposing is the Levi-Civita connection on (M, g), i.e., X g = 0 and Γ λ [µnu] = 0, the components Γ λ µν and Γ i jk are related to each other by a transformation rule. If we define the Ricci rotation coefficients Γ ijk = η il Γ l jk the metric compatibility becomes Γ ijk = η il e l λe µ j µe λ k = η il ek λ e µ j µe l λ = η kl e l λe µ j µe λ i = Γ kji where µ g = 0 has been used. Lowering the first index on the connection one-form ω ij = η ik ω k j this is simply ω ij = ω ji This condition allows us to compute cij k relation c k ij e k = [e i, e j ] = i e j j e i of the basis {e i}, using the commutation where we have exploited the torsion-free condition. Therefore in terms of connection coefficients c k ij = Γ k ij Γ k ji Substituting this into the expression for the Riemann curvature tensor, this is R i jkl = e k [Γ i lj] e l [Γ i kj] + Γ l0 lj Γi kl 0 Γ l0 kj Γi ll 0 [Γ l0 kl Γl0 lk )Γi l 0j

6 PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH Example 5.1. Recall that the sphere S the zweibein, e i µ, has non-zero components: e 1 θ = 1, e φ = sin θ The metric condition implies ω 11 = ω = 0 hence ω 1 1 = ω = 0 and so the one-forms obtained from the torsion free condition are d(dθ) + ω 1 (sin θdφ) = 0 d(sin θdφ) + ω 1 dθ = 0 From this we can solve to find ω 1 = cos θdφ and the metric condition ω 1 = ω 1 tells us that ω 1 = cos θdφ. The Riemann tensor may be found from the second structure equation ω 1 ω 1 = 1 R61 1ijθ i θ j dω 1 = 1 R1 ij θ1 θ j dω 1 = 1 R 1ij θ1 θ j ω 1 ω 1 = 1 R ij θ1 θ j The non-vanishing components are R 1 1 = R 1 1 = sin θ and R 11 = R 11 = sin θ. To return this to the coordinate basis, simply use e µ i and e i µ to transform the indices, i.e., R θ φθφ = ei θ e j φ ek θe l φr i jkl = 1 sin θ R1 1 = 1 sin θ Example 5.. The Schwarzschild metric is ( ds = 1 M ) ( dt 1 M ) 1 dr r (dθ + sin θdφ ) = (θ 0 ) (θ 1 ) (θ ) (θ 3 ) r r where θ 0 = ( 1 M r ) 1 ( dt, θ 1 = 1 M r ) 1 dr, θ = rdθ, θ 3 = r sin θdφ with parameters ranging 0 < m < r, 0 θπ and 0 φ < π. As before the metric condition implies ω i i = 0 for i = 0, 1,, 3.