Categorical relativistic quantum theory. Chris Heunen Pau Enrique Moliner Sean Tull

Similar documents
Mix Unitary Categories

Categorical quantum mechanics

Endomorphism Semialgebras in Categorical Quantum Mechanics

Topological aspects of restriction categories

1 Categorical Background

In the beginning God created tensor... as a picture

A Graph Theoretic Perspective on CPM(Rel)

MONADS ON DAGGER CATEGORIES

Infinite-dimensional Categorical Quantum Mechanics

MONADS ON DAGGER CATEGORIES

Categories and Quantum Informatics

1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.

Categories and Quantum Informatics: Hilbert spaces

Quantum Logic in Dagger Kernel Categories

Teooriaseminar. TTÜ Küberneetika Instituut. May 10, Categorical Models. for Two Intuitionistic Modal Logics. Wolfgang Jeltsch.

Reversible Monadic Computing

SERRE FINITENESS AND SERRE VANISHING FOR NON-COMMUTATIVE P 1 -BUNDLES ADAM NYMAN

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

Bases as Coalgebras. Bart Jacobs

Categorical Models for Quantum Computing

REVERSIBLE MONADIC COMPUTING

Connecting the categorical and the modal logic approaches to Quantum Mech

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

The Structure of Fusion Categories via Topological Quantum Field Theories

Involutive Categories and Monoids, with a GNS-correspondence

THE LOGIC OF BUNDLES

Category Theory. Travis Dirle. December 12, 2017

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

Custom Hypergraph Categories via Generalized Relations

NOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS

Categorical quantum channels

Manifolds, Higher Categories and Topological Field Theories

CRITERIA FOR HOMOTOPIC MAPS TO BE SO ALONG MONOTONE HOMOTOPIES

Types in categorical linguistics (& elswhere)

Categorical lattice-valued topology Lecture 1: powerset and topological theories, and their models

SPECTRAL-LIKE DUALITY FOR DISTRIBUTIVE HILBERT ALGEBRAS WITH INFIMUM

P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis. 1. Introduction

C -ALGEBRAS MATH SPRING 2015 PROBLEM SET #6

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

Maps and Monads for Modal Frames

Quantum Quandaries: A Category Theoretic Perspective

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY

Quantum groupoids and logical dualities

Partial Transformations: Semigroups, Categories and Equations. Ernie Manes, UMass, Amherst Semigroups/Categories workshop U Ottawa, May 2010

2-DIMENSIONAL TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM FIELD THEORIES AND FROBENIUS ALGEBRAS. Contents 1. The main theorem 1

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

Some Quantum Logic and a few Categories

SOME PROBLEMS AND RESULTS IN SYNTHETIC FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS

Embedding locales and formal topologies into positive topologies

Introduction to Quantum Logic. Chris Heunen

Two-sided multiplications and phantom line bundles

Characterising E-projectives via Co-monads

Notes about Filters. Samuel Mimram. December 6, 2012

THE GROTHENDIECK GROUP OF A QUANTUM PROJECTIVE SPACE BUNDLE

On a Categorical Framework for Coalgebraic Modal Logic

MV-algebras and fuzzy topologies: Stone duality extended

III A Functional Approach to General Topology

Coreflections in Algebraic Quantum Logic

The Logic of Partitions

Vector Bundles and Projective Modules. Mariano Echeverria

Monads Need Not Be Endofunctors

LECTURE X: KOSZUL DUALITY

A categorical model for a quantum circuit description language

A quantum double construction in Rel

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Two Roads to Classicality

CLASSIFYING TANGENT STRUCTURES USING WEIL ALGEBRAS

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.

On injective constructions of S-semigroups. Jan Paseka Masaryk University

Cellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems

Quantum Logic in Dagger Categories with Kernels

Complementarity in categorical. quantum mechanics.

FUNCTORS AND ADJUNCTIONS. 1. Functors

A Functorial Approach to Group C -Algebras

Fourier transforms from strongly complementary observables

h M (T ). The natural isomorphism η : M h M determines an element U = η 1

Completeness and zero-dimensionality arising from the duality between closures and lattices. Didier Deses

Physics, Language, Maths & Music

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 29 Jan 2001

Topological K-theory, Lecture 3

Derived Algebraic Geometry III: Commutative Algebra

Homological Algebra and Differential Linear Logic

The space of located subsets

Equilogical spaces and algebras for a double-power monad

A brief Introduction to Category Theory

Calculating deformation rings

DEFINITIONS: OPERADS, ALGEBRAS AND MODULES. Let S be a symmetric monoidal category with product and unit object κ.

Causal categories: a backbone for a quantumrelativistic universe of interacting processes

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis

Complexes of Hilbert C -modules

Determinant lines and determinant line bundles

Symbol Index Group GermAnal Ring AbMonoid

Auslander-Yoneda algebras and derived equivalences. Changchang Xi ( ~) ccxi/

Transparency condition in the categories of Yetter-Drinfel d modules over Hopf algebras in braided categories

THE CELLULARIZATION PRINCIPLE FOR QUILLEN ADJUNCTIONS

1 Cartesian bicategories

A Bridge between Algebra and Topology: Swan s Theorem

Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor

Universal Properties in Quantum Theory

Transcription:

Categorical relativistic quantum theory Chris Heunen Pau Enrique Moliner Sean Tull 1 / 15

Idea Hilbert modules: naive quantum field theory Idempotent subunits: base space in any category Support: where morphisms live Causal structures: relativistic quantum information 2 / 15

Base space Let X be locally compact Hausdorff space. C 0 (X) = {f : X C cts ε > 0 K X cpt: f(x \ K) < ε} C f ε K X C b (X) = {f : X C cts f < t X : f(t) f } 3 / 15

Hilbert spaces C-module H with complete C-valued inner product tensor product over C tensor unit C complex numbers C finite dimensional adjoints orthonormal basis fin-dim C*-algebra monoidal category tensor unit I scalars I I dual objects dagger commutative dagger Frobenius structure dagger Frobenius structure 4 / 15

Hilbert modules C 0 (X)-module H with complete C 0 (X)-valued inner product tensor product over C 0 (X) tensor unit C 0 (X) complex numbers C b (X) finitely presented adjoints finite coverings unif fin-dim C*-bundles monoidal category tensor unit I scalars I I dual objects dagger commutative dagger Frobenius structure dagger Frobenius structure Scalars are not numbers 4 / 15

Bundles of Hilbert spaces Bundle E X, each fibre Hilbert space, operations continuous E t E t X 5 / 15

Bundles of Hilbert spaces Bundle E X, each fibre Hilbert space, operations continuous, with E t E t X 5 / 15

Bundles of Hilbert spaces Bundle E X, each fibre Hilbert space, operations continuous, with E t E t X Hilbert C 0 (X)-modules bundles of Hilbert spaces over X sections vanishing at infinity E X E localisation 5 / 15

Idempotent subunits Definition: ISub(C) = {s: S I id S s: S S S I iso}/ 6 / 15

Idempotent subunits Definition: ISub(C) = {s: S I id S s: S S S I iso}/ Analysis: ISub(Hilb C0 (X)) = {S X open}: idempotent subunits are open subsets of base space 6 / 15

Idempotent subunits Definition: ISub(C) = {s: S I id S s: S S S I iso}/ Analysis: ISub(Hilb C0 (X)) = {S X open}: idempotent subunits are open subsets of base space Logic: ISub(Sh(X)) = {S X open}: idempotent subunits are truth values 6 / 15

Idempotent subunits Definition: ISub(C) = {s: S I id S s: S S S I iso}/ Analysis: ISub(Hilb C0 (X)) = {S X open}: idempotent subunits are open subsets of base space Logic: ISub(Sh(X)) = {S X open}: idempotent subunits are truth values Order theory: ISub(Q) = {x Q x 2 = x 1} for quantale Q: idempotent subunits are side-effect-free observations 6 / 15

Idempotent subunits Definition: ISub(C) = {s: S I id S s: S S S I iso}/ Analysis: ISub(Hilb C0 (X)) = {S X open}: idempotent subunits are open subsets of base space Logic: ISub(Sh(X)) = {S X open}: idempotent subunits are truth values Order theory: ISub(Q) = {x Q x 2 = x 1} for quantale Q: idempotent subunits are side-effect-free observations Algebra: ISub(Mod R ) = {S R ideal S = S 2 } idempotent subunits are idempotent ideals 6 / 15

Semilattice Proposition: ISub(C) is a semilattice, =, 1 = id I T I S Caveat: C must be firm, i.e. s id T monic, and size issue 7 / 15

Semilattice Proposition: ISub(C) is a semilattice, =, 1 = id I T I S Caveat: C must be firm, i.e. s id T monic, and size issue id SemiLat ISub FirmCat 7 / 15

Spatial categories Call C spatial when ISub(C) is frame SemiLat Frame ISub ISub FirmCat SpatCat (C, ) ([C op, Set] supp, Day ) 8 / 15

Support Say s ISub(C) supports f : A B when A B f B S B I id s 9 / 15

Support Say s ISub(C) supports f : A B when A B f B S B I id s f {s s supports f} supp Pow(ISub(C)) C 2 9 / 15

Support Say s ISub(C) supports f : A B when A B f B S B I id s Monoidal functor: supp(f) supp(g) supp(f g) f {s s supports f} supp Pow(ISub(C)) C 2 9 / 15

Support Say s ISub(C) supports f : A B when A B f B S B I id s Monoidal functor: supp(f) supp(g) supp(f g) f {s s supports f} supp Pow(ISub(C)) C 2 F F Q Frame universal with F (f) = {F (s) s ISub(C) supports f} 9 / 15

Restriction Full subcategory C s of A with id A s invertible: monoidal with tensor unit S coreflective: C s C tensor ideal: if A C and B C s, then A B C s monocoreflective: counit ε I monic (and id A ε I iso for A C s ) 10 / 15

Restriction Full subcategory C s of A with id A s invertible: monoidal with tensor unit S coreflective: C s C tensor ideal: if A C and B C s, then A B C s monocoreflective: counit ε I monic (and id A ε I iso for A C s ) Proposition: ISub(C) {monocoreflective tensor ideals in C} 10 / 15

Localisation A graded monad is a monoidal functor E [C, C] (η : A T (1), µ: T (t) T (s) T (s t)) Lemma: s C s is an ISub(C)-graded monad 11 / 15

Localisation A graded monad is a monoidal functor E [C, C] (η : A T (1), µ: T (t) T (s) T (s t)) Lemma: s C s is an ISub(C)-graded monad universal property of localisation for Σ = {id E s E C} ( ) S C C s = C[Σ 1 ] F inverting Σ D 11 / 15

Spacetime What if X is more than just space? Lorentzian manifold with time orientation: s t: there is future-directed timelike curve s t s t: there is future-directed non-spacelike curve s t chronological causal future I + (t) = {s X t s} J + (t) = {s X t s} past I (t) = {s X s t} J (t) = {s X s t} 12 / 15

Spacetime What if X is more than just space? Lorentzian manifold with time orientation: s t: there is future-directed timelike curve s t s t: there is future-directed non-spacelike curve s t chronological causal future I + (t) = {s X t s} J + (t) = {s X t s} past I (t) = {s X s t} J (t) = {s X s t} If S X open, then I + (S) = s S I+ (s) = s S J + (s) = J + (S) I + and I give future and past operators 12 / 15

Causal structure Closure operator on partially ordered set P is function C : P P : if s t, then C(s) C(t); s C(s); C(C(s)) C(s). Causal structure on C is pair C ± of closure operators on ISub(C) 13 / 15

Causal structure Closure operator on partially ordered set P is function C : P P : if s t, then C(s) C(t); s C(s); C(C(s)) C(s). Causal structure on C is pair C ± of closure operators on ISub(C) Proposition: if r ISub(C) and C is closure operator on C, then D(s) = C(s) r is closure operator on C r Causal structure restricts 13 / 15

Teleportation Restriction = propagation Alice Bob pair creation compact category + support + causal structure = teleportation only successful on intersection of future sets 14 / 15

Further relativistic quantum information protocols causality proof analysis control flow data flow concurrency graphical calculus 15 / 15

Complements Subunit is split when S I s id SISub(C) is a sub-semilattice of ISub(C) (don t need firmness)

Complements s Subunit is split when id S I SISub(C) is a sub-semilattice of ISub(C) (don t need firmness) If C has zero object, ISub(C) has least element 0 s, s are complements if s s = 0 and s s = 1

Complements s Subunit is split when id S I SISub(C) is a sub-semilattice of ISub(C) (don t need firmness) If C has zero object, ISub(C) has least element 0 s, s are complements if s s = 0 and s s = 1 Proposition: when C has finite biproducts, then s, s SISub(C) are complements if and only if they are biproduct injections Corollary: if distributes over, then SISub(C) is a Boolean algebra (universal property?)

Linear logic if T : C C monoidal monad, Kl(T ) is monoidal semilattice morphism {η I s s ISub(C), T (s) is monic in C} ISub(Kl(T )) is not injective, nor surjective

Linear logic if T : C C monoidal monad, Kl(T ) is monoidal semilattice morphism {η I s s ISub(C), T (s) is monic in C} ISub(Kl(T )) is not injective, nor surjective model for linear logic: -autonomous category C with finite products, monoidal comonad!: (C, ) (C, ) (then Kl(!) cartesian closed) if ε epi, then ISub(C, ) ISub(Kl(!), ) (but hard to compare to ISub(C, ))