Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions. defined by an integral operator

Similar documents
Starlike Functions of Complex Order

An Investigation on Minimal Surfaces of Multivalent Harmonic Functions 1

SUBCLASS OF HARMONIC STARLIKE FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SALAGEAN DERIVATIVE

ON A SUBCLASS OF HARMONIC UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY CONVOLUTION AND INTEGRAL CONVOLUTION

HARMONIC CLOSE-TO-CONVEX MAPPINGS

SUBCLASS OF HARMONIC UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DERIVATIVE OPERATOR

On a subclass of certain p-valent starlike functions with negative coefficients 1

The Inner Mapping Radius of Harmonic Mappings of the Unit Disk 1

Subclass of Meromorphic Functions with Positive Coefficients Defined by Frasin and Darus Operator

On a New Subclass of Salagean Type Analytic Functions

Notes on Starlike log-harmonic Functions. of Order α

Convolution Properties of Convex Harmonic Functions

Int. J. Open Problems Complex Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2011 ISSN ; Copyright c ICSRS Publication,

AClassofMultivalentHarmonicFunctionsInvolvingSalageanOperator

Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions

SOME PROPERTIES OF A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY A GENERALIZED SRIVASTAVA-ATTIYA OPERATOR. Nagat. M. Mustafa and Maslina Darus

On sandwich theorems for p-valent functions involving a new generalized differential operator

On Multivalent Functions Associated with Fixed Second Coefficient and the Principle of Subordination

A linear operator of a new class of multivalent harmonic functions

Coefficient bounds for some subclasses of p-valently starlike functions

THE FEKETE-SZEGÖ COEFFICIENT FUNCTIONAL FOR TRANSFORMS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Communicated by Mohammad Sal Moslehian. 1.

Rosihan M. Ali and V. Ravichandran 1. INTRODUCTION

FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS

Rosihan M. Ali, M. Hussain Khan, V. Ravichandran, and K. G. Subramanian. Let A(p, m) be the class of all p-valent analytic functions f(z) = z p +

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Mapping problems and harmonic univalent mappings

On a New Subclass of Meromorphically Multivalent Functions Defined by Linear Operator

Coefficient Estimates and Bloch s Constant in Some Classes of Harmonic Mappings

SOME SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR. Maslina Darus and Imran Faisal

ON POLYHARMONIC UNIVALENT MAPPINGS

SOME APPLICATIONS OF SALAGEAN INTEGRAL OPERATOR. Let A denote the class of functions of the form: f(z) = z + a k z k (1.1)

On a class of analytic functions related to Hadamard products

A general coefficient inequality 1

A Note on Coefficient Inequalities for (j, i)-symmetrical Functions with Conic Regions

Subordination and Superordination Results for Analytic Functions Associated With Convolution Structure

An Application of Wilf's Subordinating Factor Sequence on Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions

Applied Mathematics Letters

SUBORDINATION RESULTS FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIVALENT MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

COEFFICIENT BOUNDS FOR A SUBCLASS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

Old and new order of linear invariant family of harmonic mappings and the bound for Jacobian

A NEW SUBCLASS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTION WITH POSITIVE COEFFICIENTS

On Quasi-Hadamard Product of Certain Classes of Analytic Functions

On neighborhoods of functions associated with conic domains

Majorization for Certain Classes of Meromorphic Functions Defined by Integral Operator

ON CERTAIN CLASSES OF MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS INVOLVING A GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR

ON A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC CLOSE TO CONVEX FUNCTIONS IN q ANALOGUE ASSOCIATED WITH JANOWSKI FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction and definitions

Certain classes of p-valent analytic functions with negative coefficients and (λ, p)-starlike with respect to certain points

A Class of Univalent Harmonic Mappings

ON CERTAIN CLASS OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH CONIC DOMAINS INVOLVING SOKÓ L - NUNOKAWA CLASS

On subclasses of n-p-valent prestarlike functions of order beta and type gamma Author(s): [ 1 ] [ 1 ] [ 1 ] Address Abstract KeyWords

Radius of close-to-convexity and fully starlikeness of harmonic mappings

Subclasses of Analytic Functions with Respect. to Symmetric and Conjugate Points

Fekete-Szegö Inequality for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Associated with Srivastava-Attiya Integral Operator

SOME CRITERIA FOR STRONGLY STARLIKE MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS

Differential Operator of a Class of Meromorphic Univalent Functions With Negative Coefficients

SOME INCLUSION PROPERTIES OF STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH HOHLOV OPERATOR. II

A note on a subclass of analytic functions defined by a generalized Sălăgean and Ruscheweyh operator

INTEGRAL MEANS AND COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES ON PLANAR HARMONIC MAPPINGS

Weak Subordination for Convex Univalent Harmonic Functions

Convolutions of Certain Analytic Functions

On α-uniformly close-to-convex and. quasi-convex functions with. negative coefficients

ON THE GAUSS MAP OF MINIMAL GRAPHS

A Certain Subclass of Multivalent Functions Involving Higher-Order Derivatives

ON FACTORIZATIONS OF ENTIRE FUNCTIONS OF BOUNDED TYPE

SOME CLASSES OF MEROMORPHIC MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH POSITIVE COEFFICIENTS INVOLVING CERTAIN LINEAR OPERATOR

On a new class of (j, i)-symmetric function on conic regions

Subclass Of K Uniformly Starlike Functions Associated With Wright Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

UDC S. Yu. Graf ON THE SCHWARZIAN NORM OF HARMONIC MAPPINGS

ON CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS AND RADIUS PROPERTIES

FABER POLYNOMIAL COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES FOR A NEW SUBCLASS OF MEROMORPHIC BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS ADNAN GHAZY ALAMOUSH, MASLINA DARUS

HADAMARD PRODUCT OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF FUNCTIONS

du+ z f 2(u) , which generalized the result corresponding to the class of analytic functions given by Nash.

COEFFICIENTS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS INVOLVING PSEUDO-STARLIKENESS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS

Quasiconformal and Lipschitz harmonic mappings of the unit disk onto bounded convex domains

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Convolution properties for subclasses of meromorphic univalent functions of complex order. Teodor Bulboacă, Mohamed K. Aouf, Rabha M.

DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION AND SUPERORDINATION OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY THE MULTIPLIER TRANSFORMATION

Meromorphic Starlike Functions with Alternating and Missing Coefficients 1

Inclusion and argument properties for certain subclasses of multivalent functions defined by the Dziok-Srivastava operator

BIII/. Malaysinn Math. Sc. Soc. (Second Series) 26 (2003) Coefficients of the Inverse of Strongly Starlike Functions. ROSlHAN M.

Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications

Coefficient Estimate for Two Subclasses with Certain Close-to-Convex Functions

A NOTE ON A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY A GENERALIZED SĂLĂGEAN OPERATOR. Alina Alb Lupaş, Adriana Cătaş

Uniformly convex functions II

NEW SUBCLASS OF MULTIVALENT HYPERGEOMETRIC MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

A New Subclasses of Meromorphic p-valent Functions with Positive Coefficient Defined by Fractional Calculus Operators

a n z n, z U.. (1) f(z) = z + n=2 n=2 a nz n and g(z) = z + (a 1n...a mn )z n,, z U. n=2 a(a + 1)b(b + 1) z 2 + c(c + 1) 2! +...

Second Hankel Determinant Problem for a Certain Subclass of Univalent Functions

THIRD HANKEL DETERMINANT FOR THE INVERSE OF RECIPROCAL OF BOUNDED TURNING FUNCTIONS HAS A POSITIVE REAL PART OF ORDER ALPHA

Coefficient Inequalities for Classes of Uniformly. Starlike and Convex Functions Defined by Generalized. Ruscheweyh Operator

arxiv: v3 [math.cv] 11 Aug 2014

Coecient bounds for certain subclasses of analytic functions of complex order

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 18/2009 SOME SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Firas Ghanim and Maslina Darus

ON SOME LENGTH PROBLEMS FOR ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

Research Article Pascu-Type Harmonic Functions with Positive Coefficients Involving Salagean Operator

Research Article A Subclass of Harmonic Univalent Functions Associated with q-analogue of Dziok-Srivastava Operator

Convolution and Subordination Properties of Analytic Functions with Bounded Radius Rotations

Faber polynomial coefficient bounds for a subclass of bi-univalent functions

Fekete-Szegö Problem for Certain Subclass of Analytic Univalent Function using Quasi-Subordination

Differential Subordinations and Harmonic Means

Transcription:

Journal of Applied Mathematics & Bioinformatics, vol.2, no.3, 2012, 99-114 ISSN: 1792-6602 (print), 1792-6939 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2012 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions defined by an integral operator Amit Kumar Yadav 1 Abstract The object of this article is to study a class M H (p) of harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions of the form f(z) h(z)+g(z), 0 < z < 1, where h and g are meromorphic functions. An integral operator is considered and is used to define a subclass M H (p,α,m,c) of M H (p). SomepropertiesofM H (p)arestudiedwiththepropertieslikecoefficient condition, bounds, extreme points, convolution condition and convex combination for functions belongs to M H (p,α,m,c) class. Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45, 30C50, 30C55 Keywords: Meromorphic Function, Starlike functions, Integral Operator 1 Introduction and Prelimnaries A function f u + iv, which is continuos complex-valued harmonic in a domain D C, if both u and v are real harmonic in D. Cluine and Sheil- 1 Department of Information Technology Ibra College of Technology, PO Box : 327, Postal Code: 400, Alsharqiyah, Ibra, Sultanate of Oman, e-mail: amitkumar@ict.edu.om Article Info: Received : July 2, 2012. Revised : August 2, 2012 Published online : December 30, 2012

100 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... small 3] investigated the family of all complex valued harmonic mappings f definedontheopenunitdisku,whichadmitstherepresentationf(z) h(z)+ g(z) where h and g are analytic univalent in U. Hengartner and Schober 4] considered the class of functions which are harmonic, meromorphic, orientation preserving and univalent in Ũ {z : z > 1} so that f( ). Such functions admit the representation f(z) h(z)+g(z)+alog z, (1) where h(z) αz + a n z n, g(z) βz + b n z n are analytic in Ũ {z z > 1}, α,β,a C with 0 β α and w(z) f z /f z is analytic with w(z) < 1 for z Ũ. H denotes a class of functions of the form (1) with α 1,β 0. The class H has been studied in various research papers such as 5], 6] and 7]. Theorem 1.1. 4] If f H, then the diameter D f of C\f(U), satisfies D f 2 1+b 1. This estimate is sharp for f(z) z +b 1 /z +Alog z whenever b 1 < 1 and A ( 1 b 1 2) / 1+b 1, b 1 1 and A 0, or b 1 1 and A 2. A function is said to be meromorphic if poles are its only singularities in the complex plane C. Let M p (p N 0 {1,2,...}) be a class of multivalent meromorphic functions of the form: h(z) a p a p n+p 1 z n+p 1, a p 0,a n+p 1 C,z U U\{0}. (2)

Amit Kumar Yadav 101 Definition 1.2. A Bernardi type integral operator I m p,c(m 0,c > p) for meromorphic multivalent function h M p is defined as : I 0 p,ch(z) h(z) I 1 p,ch(z) c p+1 z c+1 I m p,ch(z) c p+1 z c+1 z 0 z 0 t c I 0 p,ch(t)dt t c I m 1 p,c h(t)dt, m 1. The Series expansion of I m p,ch(z) for h(z) of the form (2) is given by Ip,ch(z) m a p θ m (n) a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 (c > p,m 0), (3) where ( ) m c p+1 θ m (n). (4) n+p+c ( Note that 0 < θ m (n) < θ m c p+1 m. (1) 1+p+c) For fixed integer p 1, denote by M H (p), a family of harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions of the form f(z) h(z)+g(z), z U, (5) where h M p with a p > 0 of the form (2) and g M p of the form g(z) b n+p 1 z n+p 1,b n+p 1 C, z U. (6) In the expression (5), h is called a meromorphic part and g co-meromorphic part of f. The class M H (p) with its subclass has been studied in 1] and 8] for a p 1. A quite similar to the above mentioned integral operator was used for harmonic analytic functions in 2]. In terms of the operator defined in Defininition 1.2, an operator f M H (p) is defined as follows: Definition 1.3. Let f h + g be of the form (5), the integral operator I m p,cf(z) is defined as I m p,cf(z) I m p,ch(z)+( 1) m I m p,cg(z),z U (7)

102 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... the series expansions for Ip,ch(z) m is given by (3) with a p > 0 and for Ip,cg(z) m with g(z) of the form (6) is given as: Ip,cg(z) m θ m (n)b n+p 1 z n+p 1 (c > p,m 0). (8) Involving operator I m p,c define by (7), a class M H (p,α,m,c) of functions f M H (p) is defined as follows: Definition 1.4. A function f M H (p) is said to be in M H (p,α,m,c) if and only if it satisfies { I m } p,c f(z) Re > α, z U,0 α < 1, c > p, m N. (9) Ip,c m+1 f(z) Let M H (p,α,m,c) be a subclass of M H (p,α,m,c), consists of harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions f m h m + g m, where h m and g m are of the form h m (z) a p z a p n+p 1 z n+p 1, a p > 0 and (10) g m (z) ( 1) m+1 b n+p 1 z n+p 1. 2 Some results for the class M H (p) In this section, some results for M H (p) class are derived. Theorem 2.1. Let f M H (p) be of the form (5), then the diameter D f of clf(u ) satisfies D f 2 a p. This estimate is sharp for f(z) a p z p.

Amit Kumar Yadav 103 Proof. Let D f (r) denotes the diameter of clf(u r)(r), where U r(r) {z : 0 < z < r, 0 < r < 1} and Since D f (r) D f(r), it follows that D f (r) ] 2 4 2π 1 2π 0 a p 2 4 + r 2p a p 2 Df(r) : max f(z) f( z). z r f(re iθ ) f( re iθ ) 2 dθ r 2p + 4 a p 2 r 2p, ] ( a2n+p 2 2 + b 2n+p 2 2) r 2(2n+p 2), p is odd ] ( a2n+p 1 2 + b 2n+p 1 2) r 2(2n+p 1), p is even noted that as r 1, D f (r) decreases to D f, which concludes the result. Remark 2.2. 4]Taking p 1,a p 1 and w(z) : f(1/z) in Theorem 2.1, same result as Theorem 1.1 has been obtained for w(z), which is of the form (1) with A 0. Theorem 2.3. If f M H (p) be of the form (5), then (n+p 1) ( a n+p 1 2 b n+p 1 2) p a p 2. Equality occurs if and only if C\f(U ) has zero area. Proof. The area of the ommited set is 1 1 lim fdf lim r 12i z r r 1 2i z rhh dz + 1 ] gg 2i dz z r π p a p 2 + (n+p 1) ( a n+p 1 2 b n+p 1 2)] 0.

104 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... Remark 2.4. 4]Taking p 1,a p 1 and w(z) : f(1/z) in Theorem 2.3, then for w H,with A 0, it follows that n ( a n 2 b n 2) 1+2Rb 1. 3 Coefficient Conditions In this section, sufficient coefficient condition for a functiom f M H (p) to beinm H (p,α,m,c)classisestablishedandthenitisshownthatthiscoefficient condition is necessary for its subclass M H (p,α,m,c). Theorem 3.1. Let f(z) h(z)+g(z) be the form (5) and θ m (n) is given by (4) if θ m (n) ( 1 αθ 1 (n) ) a n+p 1 + ( 1+αθ 1 (n) ) b n+p 1 ], (11) holds for 0 α < 1 and m N, then f(z) is harmonic in U and f M H (p,α,m,c). Proof. Let the function f(z) h(z)+g(z) be the form (5) satisfying (11). In order to show f M H (p,α,m,c), it suffices to show that or, Re { I m } p,c f(z) Re > α (12) Ip,c m+1 f(z) { I m p,c h(z)+( 1) m I m p,cg(z) I m+1 p,c h(z)+( 1) m+1 I m+1 p,c g(z) where z re iθ, 0 < r 1, 0 θ 2π and 0 α < 1. Let } > α A(z) : I m p,ch(z)+( 1) m I m p,cg(z) (13) and B(z) : I m+1 p,c h(z)+( 1) m+1 I m+1 p,c g(z). (14)

Amit Kumar Yadav 105 It is observed that (12) holds if A(z)+(1 α)b(z) A(z) (1+α)B(z) 0. (15) From (13) and (14), it follows that A(z)+(1 α)b(z) and Ip,ch(z)+( 1) m m Ip,cg(z)+(1 α) m ( I m+1 p,c h(z)+( 1) m+1 I m+1 p,c g(z)) (2 α)a p θ m (n)+(1 α)θ m+1 (n) ] a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 (2 α)a p z p +( 1) m θ m (n) (1 α)θ m+1 (n) ] b n+p 1 z n+p 1 θ m (n) 1+(1 α)θ 1 (n) ] a n+p 1 z n+p 1 θ m (n) 1 (1 α)θ 1 (n) ] b n+p 1 z n+p 1 A(z) (1+α)B(z) Ip,ch(z)+( 1) m m Ip,cg(z) (1+α) m ( I m+1 p,c h(z)+( 1) m+1 I m+1 p,c g(z)) ( α)a p θ m (n) (1+α)θ m+1 (n) ] a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 +( 1) m θ m (n)+(1+α)θ m+1 (n) ] b n+p 1 z n+p 1 αa p z θ m (n) (1+α)θ m+1 (n) ] a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 α a p z p + ( 1) m θ m (n)+(1+α)θ m+1 (n) ] b n+p 1 z n+p 1 θ m (n) 1 (1+α)θ 1 (n) ] a n+p 1 z n+p 1 + θ m (n) 1+(1+α)θ 1 (n) ] b n+p 1 z n+p 1.

106 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... Thus A(z)+(1 α)b(z) A(z) (1+α)B(z) 2 z p 2 θ m (n) 1 αθ 1 (n) ] a n+p 1 z n+p 1 2 θ m (n) 1+αθ 1 (n) ] b n+p 1 z n+p 1 { 2 z p a p (1 α) 2 0, { θ m (n) 1 αθ 1 (n) ] a n+p 1 z n 1 θ m (n) 1+αθ 1 (n) ] } b n+p 1 z n 1 θ m (n) ( 1 αθ 1 (n) ) a n+p 1 + ( 1+αθ 1 (n) ) b n+p 1 ]} if (11) holds. This proves the Theorem. Theorem 3.2. Let f m h m +g m where h m and g m are of the form (10) then f m M H (p,α,m,c) under the same parametric conditions taken in Theorem 3.1, if and only if the inequality (11) holds. Proof. Since M H (p,α,m,c) M H (p,α,m,c), if part is proved in Theorem 3.1. It only needs to prove the only if part of the Theorem. For this, it suffices to show that f m / M H (p,α,m,c) if the condition (11) does not hold. If f m M H (p,α,m,c), } then writing corresponding series expansions in (9), it follows that Re 0 for all values of z in U where and { ξ(z) η(z) ξ(z) (1 α) a p θ m (n) 1 αθ 1 (n) ] a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 θ m (n) 1+αθ 1 (n) ] b n+p 1 z n+p 1 η(z) a p θ m+1 (n) a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 θ m+1 (n) b n+p 1 z n+p 1.

Amit Kumar Yadav 107 Since hence the condition Re { } ξ(z) ξ(z) η(z) Re 0, η(z) } 0 holds if { ξ(z) η(z) θ m (n)(1 αθ 1 (n)) a n+p 1 +(1+αθ 1 (n)) b n+p 1 ]r n+2p 1 a p + θ m+1 (n) a n+p 1 r n+2p 1 + 0. θ m+1 (n) b n+p 1 r n+2p 1 (16) Now if the condition (11) does not holds then the numerator of above equation is non-positive for r sufficiently close to 1, which contradicts that f m M H (p,α,m,c) and this proves the required result. 4 Bounds and Extreme Points In this section, bounds for functions belonging to the class M H (p,α,m,c) are obtained and also provide extreme points for the same class. Theorem 4.1. If f m h m +g m M H (p,α,m,c) for 0 α < 1, 0 < z r < 1, and θ m (n) is given by (4), under the same parametric conditions taken in Theorem 3.1 then a p r p rp 1 αθ 1 (1)] I m p,cf k (z) a p r p +rp 1 αθ 1 (1)]. Proof. Let f m h m +g m M H (p,α,m,c). Taking the absolute value of I m p,cf m from (7), it follows that I m p,cf m (z) a p θ m (n) a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 +( 1) 2m+1 θ m (n) b n+p 1 z n+p 1 a p z + θ m (n)( a p n+p 1 b n+p 1 )z n+p 1

108 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... I m p,cf m (z) a p r p +rp and I m p,cf m (z) a p r p +rp a p r p + a p r p + θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n)] θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n)] θm (n)( a n+p 1 + b n+p 1 ) θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n)] θ m (n)1 αθ 1 (n)] θm (n)( a n+p 1 + b n+p 1 ) r p θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n) ] ( a 1 αθ 1 n+p 1 + b n+p 1 ) (1)] r p θ m (n) ( 1 αθ 1 (n) ) a 1 αθ 1 n+p 1 ] (1)] a p r p +rp 1 αθ 1 (1)] I m p,cf m (z) a p r p rp + θ m (n) ( 1+αθ 1 (n) ) b n+p 1 ]] a p θ m (n) a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 +( 1) 2m+1 θ m (n) b n+p 1 z n+p 1 a p z + θ m (n)( a p n+p 1 b n+p 1 )z n+p 1 a p r p rp a p r p θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n)] θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n)] θm (n)( a n+p 1 + b n+p 1 ) θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n)] θ m (n)1 αθ 1 (n)] θm (n)( a n+p 1 + b n+p 1 ) r p θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n) ] ( a 1 αθ 1 n+p 1 + b n+p 1 ) (1)] a p r r p θ m (n) ( 1 αθ 1 (n) ) a p 1 αθ 1 n+p 1 ] (1)] + θ m (n) ( 1+αθ 1 (n) ) b n+p 1 ]] a p r p rp 1 αθ 1 (1)] This proves the required result.

Amit Kumar Yadav 109 Corollary 4.2. Let f m h m +g m M H (p,α,m,c), for z U and θ m (n) is given by (4), under the same parametric conditions taken in Theorem 3.1 then { w : w < a p (1 α)a } p f(u ). 1 αθ 1 (1)] Theorem 4.3. Let f m h m +g m, where h m and g m are of the form (10) then f m M H (p,α,m,c) and θ m (n) is given by (4), under the same parametric conditions taken in Theorem 3.1, if and only if f m can be expressed as: f m (z) where z U and ( xn+p 1 h mn+p 1(z)+y n+p 1 g ) mn+p 1(z), (17) n0 h mp 1 (z) a p z, h p m n+p 1 (z) a p z + p θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n) zn+p 1, (18) g mp 1 (z) a p z, g p m n+p 1 (z) a p z p +( 1)m+1 θ m (n)+αθ m+1 (n) zn+p 1 (19) for n 1,2,3,..., and Proof. Let f m (z) (x n+p 1 +y n+p 1 ) 1, x n+p 1, y n+p 1 0. (20) ( xn+p 1 h mn+p 1(z)+y n+p 1 g ) mn+p 1(z) n0 ( ) a p x p 1 h mp 1 +y p 1 g mp 1 + x n+p 1 z + p θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n) zn+p 1 ( ) a p + y n+p 1 z p +( 1)m+1 θ m (n)+αθ m+1 (n) zn+p 1 f m (z) (x n+p 1 +y n+p 1 ) a p {( ) p θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n) x n+p 1 n0 } +( 1) m+1 θ m (n)+αθ m+1 (n) y n+p 1 z n+p 1.

110 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... Thus by Theorem 3.2, f m M H (p,α,m,c), since, { ( ) θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n) (1 α)a p θ m (n) αθ m+1 (n) x n+p 1 ( )} θm (n)+αθ m+1 (n) θ m (n)+αθ m+1 (n) y n+p 1 (x n+p 1 +y n+p 1 ) (1 x p 1 y p 1 ) 1. Conversly, suppose that f m M H (p,α,m,c), then (11) holds. Setting which satisfy (20), thus x n+p 1 θm (n) αθ m+1 (n) a n+p 1 y n+p 1 θm (n)+αθ m+1 (n) b n+p 1 f m (z) a p a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 +( 1) m+1 b n+p 1 z n+p 1 a p p θ m (n)+αθ m+1 (n) x n+p 1z n+p 1 +( 1) m+1 θ m (n)+αθ m+1 (n) y n+p 1z n+p 1 a p h p mn+p 1 a ] p x z p n+p 1 + g mn+p 1 a ] p y z p n+p 1 a p 1 x z p n+p 1 y n+p 1 ]+ h mn+p 1 x n+p 1 +g mn+p 1 y n+p 1 x p 1 h mp 1 +y p 1 g mp 1 + h mn+p 1 x n+p 1 + g mn+p 1 y n+p 1 ( xn+p 1 h mn+p 1(z)+y n+p 1 g ) mn+p 1(z) This proves the Theorem.

Amit Kumar Yadav 111 Remark 4.4. The extreme points for the class M H (p,α,m,c) are given by (18) and (19). 5 Convolution and Integral Convolution In this section, convolution and integral convolution properties of the class M H (p,α,m,c) are established. Let f m,f m M H (p) be defined as follows: f m (z) a p a p n+p 1 z n+p 1 +( 1) m+1 b n+p 1 z n+p 1, z U, F m (z) a p A p n+p 1 z n+p 1 +( 1) m+1 B n+p 1 z n+p 1, z U. The convolution of f m and F m for m N, z U is defined as: (f m F m )(z) f m (z) F m (z) a p a p n+p 1 A n+p 1 z n+p 1 + (21) +( 1) m+1 b n+p 1 B n+p 1 z n+p 1. The integral convolution of f m and F m for m N, z U is defined as: (f m F m )(z) f m (z) F m (z) a p p a n+p 1 A n+p 1 z n+p 1 (22) p n+p 1 +( 1) m+1 p b n+p 1 B n+p 1 z n+p 1. n+p 1 Theorem 5.1. For 0 α < 1, m N. If f m,f m M H (p,α,m,c) and θ m (n) is given by (4) then (f m F m ) M H (p,α,m,c).

112 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... Proof. Since F m M H (p,α,m,c), then by Theorem 3.2, A n+p 1 1 and B n+p 1 1, hence, { 1 αθ θ m 1 (n) (n) (1 α)a p { 1+αθ 1 (n) + { } 1 αθ θ m 1 (n) (n) a n+p 1 (1 α)a p { 1+αθ 1 (n) + 1 } A n+p 1 a n+p 1 } ] B n+p 1 b n+p 1 } ] b n+p 1 as f m M H (p,α,m,c). Thus by the Theorem 3.2, (f m F m ) M H (p,α,m,c). Theorem 5.2. For 0 α < 1, m N. If f m,f m M H (p,α,m,c) and θ m (n) is given by (4) then (f m F m ) M H (p,α,m,c). Proof. Since F m M H (p,α,m,c), then by Theorem 3.2, A n+p 1 1, p B n+p 1 1 and 1 hence, n+p 1 { } 1 αθ θ m 1 (n) p an+p 1 A n+p 1 (n) (1 α)a p n+p 1 { } ] 1+αθ 1 (n) p bn+p 1 B n+p 1 + n+p 1 { } 1 αθ θ m 1 (n) (n) a n+p 1 (1 α)a p { } ] 1+αθ 1 (n) + b n+p 1 1 as f m M H (p,α,m,c). Thus by the Theorem 3.2, (f m F m ) M H (p,α,m,c).

Amit Kumar Yadav 113 6 Convex Combination In this section, it is proved that the class M H (p,α,m,c) is closed under convex linear combination of its members. Theorem 6.1. Let the functions f mj (z) defined as: f mj (z) a p a p n+p 1,j z n+p 1 +( 1) m+1 b n+p 1,j z n+p 1, z U. be in the class M H (p,α,m,c) for every j 1,2,3..., then the function ψ(z) c j f mj (z) j1 is also in the class M H (p,α,m,c), where c j 1 for c j 0 (j 1,2,3...). Proof. From the definition ψ(z) a ( p ) ( ) c p j a n+p 1,j z n+p 1 +( 1) m+1 c j b n+p 1,j z n+p 1. j1 j1 j1 (23) Since f mj (z) M H (p,α,m,c) for every j 1,2,3..., then by Theorem 3.2, it follows that {1 αθ } ( θ m 1 ) (n) (n) c j a n+p 1,j j1 { } ( 1+αθ 1 )] (n) + c j b n+p 1,j ( { 1 αθ 1 (n) c j (1 α)a p { 1+αθ 1 (n) + c j.1 1. j1 j1 j1 } a n+p 1,j } ) b n+p 1,j Hence ψ(z) M H (p,α,m,c), which is the desired result.

114 Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions... References 1] H. Bostanci and M. Öztürk, New Classes of Salagean type Meromorphic Harmonic Functions, Int. J. Math. Sc., 2(1), (2008), 52-57. 2] L.I. Cotuirlua, Harmonic Multivalent Functions defined by Integral Operator, Studia Univ. Babes-Bolyai, Mathematica, LIV(1), (March, 2009). 3] J. Clunie and T. Sheil-Small, Harmonic Univalent Functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. AI Math., 9, (1984), 3-25. 4] W. Hengartner and G.Schober, Univalent Harmonic Functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 299(1), (1987), 1-31. 5] J.M. Jahangiri and H. Silverman, Harmonic Meromorphic Univalent Functions with negative Coefficients, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 36(4), (1999), 763-770. 6] J.M. Jahangiri, Harmonic Meromorphic Starlike Functions, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 37, (2001), 291-301. 7] J.M. Jahangiri and O.P. Ahuja, Multivalent Harmonic Starlike Functions, Ann. Univ. Marie Curie-Sklodowska, Sect. A. LVI, (2001), 1-13. 8] K.Al. Shaqsi and M. Darus, On Meromorphic Harmonic Functions with respect to k-symmetric points, J. In. Ap., 2008, Art. 259205.