A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

Similar documents
Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs

Optimizing Standard Preparation

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc.

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013.

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: Cascade Thornapple River Assoc. Project: Water Analysis Lab Order:

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

Blood Alcohol Determination using Static Headspace Analysis with Optimized Sample Throughput

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

Target Compound Results Summary

Measuring Environmental Volatile Organic Compounds by U.S. EPA Method 8260B with Headspace Trap GC/MS

ANNE JUREK. Abstract: soils and are found. in can also with GC/MS. poster. in series. option for. There are problems. analytes. in methanol.

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete

Reduced VOC Sample Analysis Times Using a New Dual Purge-and-Trap System

AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 1 of 5

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Electronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical Model of Analyte Uptake by Permeation Passive Samplers

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley

McCAMPBELL ANALYTICAL INC Willow Pass Road Pittsburg CA

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

METHOD 5021 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN SOILS AND OTHER SOLID MATRICES USING EQUILIBRIUM HEADSPACE ANALYSIS

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Associates. Project No.: October 25, 2017

Volatile Organic Compounds in Water PBM

Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: SDG Number: Job Description: Joint Base Cape Cod

Date Issued: April 01, 2013 Expiration Date: June 30, 2013

Volatile Organic Compounds in Every Day Food

Thermal Desorption Technical Support

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

Techniques for Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge-and-Trap/GC/MS Application

Enhanced Preconcentrator for the Analysis of Vapor Phase Volatile Organic Compounds

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Application Note 116 Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ

UCMR 3 Low-Level VOC Analysis by Purge and Trap Concentration and GC/MS using Selective Ion Monitoring

Method 1624 Revision C Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GCMS

R.E.A.C.T. Roxbury Environmental Action CoaliTion P.O. Box 244 Ledgewood, N.J Website:

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

Optimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident

Table 1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Summary Table

Kendrick mass = IUPAC mass x (14/ ) (1) Kendrick mass defect = nominal Kendrick mass exact Kendrick mass (2)

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Purgeable Organic Compounds (VOC s) in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

In-Tube Extraction Sample Preparation for Gas Chromatography

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

317 Elm Street Milford, NH (603) Fax (603)

Laboratory Report Number(s) Lone Tree Road (Deep) 10/5/15, 10/19/15, 6/13/16. Address Sample Date(s) Analyses Requested

Analysis of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Utilizing the Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70

Certificate of Accreditation

STONY HOLLOW LANDFILL, INC S. Gettysburg Ave. Dayton, OH (937) (937) Fax

January 19, Dear Mr. Nightingale:

Transcription:

JSB is an authorised partner of A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Anne Jurek #101 Introduction: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8260 is used to determine Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in a variety of matrices. These matrices can vary from water to soil to sludge. In order to determine VOCs in the assorted matrices, the sampling and analysis system needs to be calibrated as closely to the matrix as possible. Theref re, USEPA Method 8260 requires a separate calibration for waters, soils and extractions. This application note will demonstrate a patent pending, automated water sampling mode using the soil sampling station of the autosampler thus eliminating the need to have separate calibrations for waters and soils. Discussion: Environmental laboratories are always searching for ways to save time and run more samples per twelve hour increment. In order to save time, the bake time can be reduced, the purge time and flow can be changed, a dual sampling system can be run on one GC/MS, etc. However, one of the most basic ways to save time is by reducing the number of required curves and standards that need to be run. Unfortunately, the USEPA Method 8260 dictates the curves and sample experimental parameters need to be the same, and remain 5035 compliant, until now. EST Analytical has designed a patent pending, automated water sampling mode that will allow environmental laboratories to run water samples in the soil mode. Thu, water and soil curves, standards, blanks and samples can use the same sampling parameters. (See steps 1, 2, and 3 below). This innovative sampling mode would eliminate the need to have separate curves, standards, etc. for soils and waters, thus saving laboratories time and money. Step 1: Empty vials are placed in one tray while water standards or samples are placed in the second tray. The system transports the empty vial to the soil sampling station and it is moved onto the sample needle.

Step 2: The arm moves over to the full water vial, the vial is pressurized with helium gas and the prescribed water volume is removed. Internal standard (IS) is added by injecting IS into the sample as it is transported to the vial in the soil sampling station. Step 3: The sample is heated and purged in the same manner as a soil sample, and the analytes are trapped on the analytical trap. Next, the analytes are desorbed onto the GC column. Experimental: The sampling system used for this study was the EST Analytical Centurion WS autosampler and Encon Evolution concentrator. The concentrator was affixed with a Vocarb 3000 trap and connected to an Agilent 7890A GC and 5975 inert XL MS. The GC was configured with a Restek Rxi-624 Sil MS 30m x 0.25mm x 1.4µm column. The GC/MS experimental conditions are outlined in Table 1. The experiments were run using the extraction mode of the Centurion WS. Refer to Table 2 for the sampling method parameters. GC/MS Inlet Inlet Temp. Inlet Head Pressure Mode Split Ratio Column Oven Temp. Program Column Flow Rate Gas Total Flow Source Temp. Quad Temp. MS Transfer Line Temp. Scan Range Scans Solvent Delay Agilent 7890A/5975 inert XL Split/Splitless 200ºC 12.153 psi Split 40:1 Rxi-624Sil MS 30m x 0.25mm I.D. 1.4µm film thickness 45ºC hold for 1 min., ramp 15ºC/min to 220ºC, hold for 1.3 min. 1.0mL/min Helium 44.00mL/min 230ºC 180ºC m/z 35-265 3.12 scans/sec 0.7 min Table 1: GCMS Parameters

Purge and Trap Concentrator Trap Type Valve Oven Temp. Transfer Line Temp. Trap Temp. Moisture Reduction Trap (MoRT) Temp. Purge Time Purge Flow Dry Purge Temp. Dry Purge Flow Dry Purge Time Desorb Pressure Control Desorb Pressure Desorb Time Desorb Preheat Delay Desorb Temp. Moisture Reduction Trap (MoRT) Bake Temp. Bake Temp Sparge Vessel Bake Temp. Bake Time Bake Flow Purge and Trap Auto-Sampler Sample Type Sample Fill Mode Sample Volume IS Volume Needle Rinse Time Needle Sweep Time Concentrator Desorb Time Syringe Rinse Number of Syringe Rinses Sparge Rinse Time EST Encon Evolution Vocarb 3000 35ºC 39ºC 11 min ambient 1.0 min On 5psi 0.5 min 5 sec. 260ºC 230ºC 270ºC 120ºC 8 EST Centurion WS Water (Extraction Mode) Syringe 10mL 5µl 20 sec 20 sec 0.5 min On/12mL 2 Off Water Heater Temp. 85ºC Table 2: Purge and Trap Water Parameters The USEPA Method 8260 standards were acquired from Restek. The linear range of the water extraction experiment was established by running a nine point calibration curve with a range of 0.5 to 200ppb. Method detection limits were also established for each compound by examining seven replicate standards of the low calibration point. Finally, precision and accuracy were determined by running seven replicate midpoint standards. Experimental Results are listed in Table 3.

Compound %RSD RF MDL Precision (%RSD 50ppb) Accuracy 50ppb Recovery Compound %RSD RF MDL Precision (%RSD 50ppb) Accuracy 50ppb Recovery Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane diethyl ether 1,1,2-trichlorofluoroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Acetone Iodomethane Carbon Disulfide allyl chloride Methylene Chloride acetonitrile Tert Butyl Alcohol MTBE cis-1,2-dichloroethene acrylonitrile Isopropylether Vinyl acetate 1,1-Dichloroethane Ethyl Tert Butyl Ether (ETBE) trans-1,2-dichloroethene ethyl acetate 2-Butanone 2,2-Dichloropropane Bromochloromethane propionitrile methacrylonitrile THF Chloroform methyl acrylate Dibromofluoromethane SUR 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2-Chloroethylvinylether Carbon Tetrachloride 1,1-Dichloropropene methyl acetate Tert Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) Benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane propyl acetate Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane methyl methacrylate Dibromomethane Bromodichloromethane 8.39 0.681 0.18 3.19 104.57 cis-1,3-dichloropropene 10.18 0.824 0.08 1.05 108.02 9.74 1.436 0.12 2.12 100.67 4-methyl-2-pentanone 3.11 0.621 0.08 1.98 104.54 8.59 1.529 0.09 1.41 112.97 Toluene-d8 SUR 9.15 2.026 0.09 1.10 108.73 10.19 1.429 0.18 1.20 98.16 Toluene 8.6 1.383 0.09 0.94 110.91 6.12 0.622 0.23 4.61 106.65 ethyl methacrylate 10.93 0.699 0.07 2.13 112.74 5.04 1.207 0.13 1.96 102.31 trans-1,3-dichloropropene 11.07 0.803 0.12 0.90 111.66 4.39 0.593 0.15 3.06 103.62 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 7.42 0.478 0.17 1.77 106.88 3.9 0.731 0.19 1.68 102.41 Tetrachloroethene 11.34 0.641 0.22 0.96 125.02 4.26 0.680 0.10 2.02 102.43 1,3-Dichloropropane 6.91 0.833 0.10 1.45 106.40 12.08 0.329 0.57 3.55 96.00 isopropyl acetate 10.84 0.141 0.23 1.85 109.14 *0.999 0.540 0.10 3.31 98.65 butyl acetate 8.25 0.395 0.22 2.14 104.57 5.92 2.143 0.18 1.35 101.99 Dibromochloromethane 12.28 0.51 0.11 1.54 114.85 6.59 0.997 0.18 1.87 103.38 2-Hexanone 4.51 0.469 0.25 2.21 103.87 5.89 0.800 0.14 1.97 99.36 1,2-Dibromoethane 6.93 0.5 0.12 1.30 106.64 11.85 0.092 0.37 5.85 93.77 Chlorobenzene 6.12 1.409 0.11 0.99 103.75 9.98 0.144 1.09 3.46 102.11 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 12 0.492 0.15 1.62 113.41 4.96 2.449 0.07 2.78 105.59 Ethylbenzene 8.85 2.499 0.12 1.10 110.51 5.9 0.909 0.08 2.05 103.58 Xylene (m+p) 11.12 1.945 0.21 1.11 113.70 4.62 0.339 0.28 3.58 103.67 Styrene 13.39 1.559 0.09 1.27 115.55 8.98 2.315 0.10 2.03 107.06 Xylene (o) 10.51 1.968 0.08 1.26 112.84 9.98 2.712 0.04 2.67 95.55 n-amyl acetate 8.03 0.887 0.08 2.12 112.03 7.7 1.497 0.10 1.94 105.28 Bromoform 12.14 0.348 0.11 1.90 112.12 3.87 2.462 0.09 2.51 104.93 Isopropylbenzene 11.49 2.391 0.11 1.49 110.51 4.26 0.680 0.10 2.02 102.43 cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 13.82 0.21 0.18 1.74 116.59 6.41 0.141 0.23 2.10 96.26 BFB SUR 8.61 1.101 0.15 1.95 99.76 4.23 1.428 0.14 3.16 100.25 Bromobenzene 5.18 1.798 0.16 4.24 103.89 11.39 1.131 0.14 4.08 101.61 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 7.76 0.818 0.11 5.56 100.86 5.99 0.503 0.09 1.80 102.76 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 6.76 0.99 0.07 2.55 100.40 9.02 0.156 0.21 2.28 104.45 n-propylbenzene 7.36 4.695 0.09 1.83 105.83 4.23 0.519 0.12 3.00 101.44 trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 6.24 0.355 0.23 2.30 103.67 11.84 0.326 0.35 3.41 93.23 2-Chlorotoluene 4.95 0.941 0.12 1.76 100.84 4.79 1.455 0.18 1.57 104.32 4-Chlorotoluene 6.89 1.01 0.15 1.73 101.21 2.9 0.873 0.13 2.50 103.84 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 10.58 3.206 0.09 1.94 106.94 2.74 0.802 0.11 2.02 100.97 tert-butylbenzene 11.97 2.827 0.11 1.98 103.40 4.04 1.256 0.08 1.36 105.53 sec-butylbenzene 8.54 0.852 0.17 2.32 102.89 8.86 0.342 0.18 2.89 120.49 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.52 3.286 0.13 1.88 106.27 12.96 1.038 0.09 1.84 109.80 nitrobenzene *0.998 0.068 0.69 4.98 94.35 8.11 1.145 0.13 2.06 106.95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 7.31 1.915 0.12 1.64 100.26 6.01 0.859 0.10 2.50 102.39 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10.59 1.999 0.18 2.04 96.53 5.67 2.370 0.07 2.80 107.09 Isopropyltoluene 13.34 3.486 0.11 1.91 107.66 5.52 3.329 0.05 1.52 104.94 1,2,-Dichlorobenzene 8.27 1.841 0.14 2.09 99.17 4.52 1.244 0.09 2.06 103.94 n-butylbenzene 10.94 3.176 0.13 1.88 109.27 6.23 0.884 0.13 1.63 105.03 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11.97 0.219 0.35 3.12 107.17 6.86 0.328 0.10 0.57 103.48 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10.62 1.275 0.13 2.12 95.00 10.27 0.544 0.11 1.25 105.25 Naphthalene 10.87 3.271 0.12 2.69 95.76 9.17 0.474 0.08 1.82 111.39 Hexachlorobutadiene 7.03 0.529 0.13 2.77 100.38 6.64 0.351 0.11 1.40 103.25 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 11.84 1.125 0.10 2.35 97.25 9.86 0.745 0.08 1.07 109.68 8.12 1.194 0.16 2.17 104.86 2-nitropropane 5.53 0.206 0.23 1.88 105.34 Table 3: Experimental Results

Figure 1: 50ppb Chromatogram of a Water Sample Run in Soil Mode Conclusion: The patent pending sampling process of the Centurion WS proved to be a reliable and accurate sampling method for running water samples in the soil mode. The curve linearity and method detection limits both met USEPA Method 8260 requirements, and the precision and accuracy results were excellent. The water extraction option offered with the Centurion WS will save laboratories time and money because only one set of standards, curves, etc. is required for both water and soil samples. References: 1. Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS); United States Environmental Protection Agency Method 8260B, Revision 2, December 1996. Headquarters JSB International Tramstraat 15 5611 CM Eindhoven T +31 (0) 40 251 47 53 F +31 (0) 40 251 47 58 With courtesy of Zoex Europe Tramstraat 15 5611 CM Eindhoven T +31 (0) 40 257 39 72 F +31 (0) 40 251 47 58 Sales and Service Netherlands Apolloweg 2B 8239 DA Lelystad T +31 (0) 320 87 00 18 F +31 (0) 320 87 00 19 Belgium Grensstraat 7 Box 3 1831 Diegem T +32 (0) 2 721 92 11 F +32 (0) 2 720 76 22 Germany Max-Planck-Strasse 4 D-47475 Kamp-Lintfort T +49 (0) 28 42 9280 799 F +49 (0) 28 42 9732 638 UK & Ireland Cedar Court, Grove Park Business Est. White Waltham, Maidenhead Berks, SL6 3LW T +44 (0) 16 288 220 48 F +44 (0) 70 394 006 78 info@go-jsb.com www.go-jsb.com