Advanced Tokamak Research in JT-60U and JT-60SA

Similar documents
Dependence of Achievable β N on Discharge Shape and Edge Safety Factor in DIII D Steady-State Scenario Discharges

ITER operation. Ben Dudson. 14 th March Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK

Analysis and modelling of MHD instabilities in DIII-D plasmas for the ITER mission

HIGH PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENTS IN JT-60U REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES

THE DIII D PROGRAM THREE-YEAR PLAN

Recent Development of LHD Experiment. O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science

Optimization of Stationary High-Performance Scenarios

Physics Basis of ITER-FEAT

Localized Electron Cyclotron Current Drive in DIII D: Experiment and Theory

Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U

Stationary, High Bootstrap Fraction Plasmas in DIII-D Without Inductive Current Control

MHD. Jeff Freidberg MIT

Computational Study of Non-Inductive Current Buildup in Compact DEMO Plant with Slim Center Solenoid

Securing High β N JT-60SA Operational Space by MHD Stability and Active Control Modelling

Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U

PHYSICS OF CFETR. Baonian Wan for CFETR physics group Institute of Plasma Physcis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.

Ion Heating Experiments Using Perpendicular Neutral Beam Injection in the Large Helical Device

Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIII-D

Dynamics of ion internal transport barrier in LHD heliotron and JT-60U tokamak plasmas

Current density modelling in JET and JT-60U identity plasma experiments. Paula Sirén

Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations

Control of Neo-classical tearing mode (NTM) in advanced scenarios

(Motivation) Reactor tokamaks have to run without disruptions

Overview of Pilot Plant Studies

Local organizer. National Centralized Tokamak

Heating and Current Drive by Electron Cyclotron Waves in JT-60U

- Effect of Stochastic Field and Resonant Magnetic Perturbation on Global MHD Fluctuation -

Study of Current drive efficiency and its correlation with photon temperature in the HT-7 tokomak

Extension of High-Beta Plasma Operation to Low Collisional Regime

Performance limits. Ben Dudson. 24 th February Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK

Development of a Systematic, Self-consistent Algorithm for the K-DEMO Steady-state Operation Scenario

OPERATION OF ITER OVER A RANGE OF TOROIDAL FIELDS POSES CHALLENGES FOR THE ECH SYSTEM. What can the ECH system do at different toroidal fields?

Progress Toward High Performance Steady-State Operation in DIII D

STABILIZATION OF m=2/n=1 TEARING MODES BY ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE IN THE DIII D TOKAMAK

Role of the Electron Temperature in the Current Decay during Disruption in JT-60U )

Plan of Off-axis Neutral Beam Injector in KSTAR

Control of Sawtooth Oscillation Dynamics using Externally Applied Stellarator Transform. Jeffrey Herfindal

DIII D. by F. Turco 1. New York, January 23 rd, 2015

Plasma Stability in Tokamaks and Stellarators

Tokamak/Helical Configurations Related to LHD and CHS-qa

1999 RESEARCH SUMMARY

Comparison of Ion Internal Transport Barrier Formation between Hydrogen and Helium Dominated Plasmas )

TOKAMAK EXPERIMENTS - Summary -

Joint ITER-IAEA-ICTP Advanced Workshop on Fusion and Plasma Physics October Introduction to Fusion Leading to ITER

DT Fusion Ignition of LHD-Type Helical Reactor by Joule Heating Associated with Magnetic Axis Shift )

Core and edge toroidal rotation study in JT-60U

DIII D UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROL OF TRANSPORT IN ADVANCED TOKAMAK REGIMES IN DIII D QTYUIOP C.M. GREENFIELD. Presented by

DIAGNOSTICS FOR ADVANCED TOKAMAK RESEARCH

Comparative Transport Analysis of JET and JT-60U Discharges

Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas )

A Hybrid Inductive Scenario for a Pulsed- Burn RFP Reactor with Quasi-Steady Current. John Sarff

Influence of Beta, Shape and Rotation on the H-mode Pedestal Height

Progressing Performance Tokamak Core Physics. Marco Wischmeier Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Garching marco.wischmeier at ipp.mpg.

Disruption dynamics in NSTX. long-pulse discharges. Presented by J.E. Menard, PPPL. for the NSTX Research Team

STEADY-STATE EXHAUST OF HELIUM ASH IN THE W-SHAPED DIVERTOR OF JT-60U

Neoclassical Tearing Modes

Summary of CDBM Joint Experiments

Der Stellarator Ein alternatives Einschlusskonzept für ein Fusionskraftwerk

Effects of stellarator transform on sawtooth oscillations in CTH. Jeffrey Herfindal

Toward the Realization of Fusion Energy

Direct drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks

Integrated Modelling of ITER Scenarios with ECCD

Design concept of near term DEMO reactor with high temperature blanket

DIII D Research in Support of ITER

MHD instability driven by supra-thermal electrons in TJ-II stellarator

NIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU. General Atomics. Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997

Characteristics of Internal Transport Barrier in JT-60U Reversed Shear Plasmas

GA A26242 COMPREHENSIVE CONTROL OF RESISTIVE WALL MODES IN DIII-D ADVANCED TOKAMAK PLASMAS

The performance of improved H-modes at ASDEX Upgrade and projection to ITER

Critical Physics Issues for DEMO

Evaluation of CT injection to RFP for performance improvement and reconnection studies

Development in DIII D Tokamak Hybrid Operation Scenarios

Dimensionless Identity Experiments in JT-60U and JET

Effects of Alpha Particle Transport Driven by Alfvénic Instabilities on Proposed Burning Plasma Scenarios on ITER

Impact of High Field & High Confinement on L-mode-Edge Negative Triangularity Tokamak (NTT) Reactor

Studies of Next-Step Spherical Tokamaks Using High-Temperature Superconductors Jonathan Menard (PPPL)

Role of Magnetic Configuration and Heating Power in ITB Formation in JET.

Overview of Tokamak Rotation and Momentum Transport Phenomenology and Motivations

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Chengdu, China, October 2006

MHD-particle simulations and collective alpha-particle transport: analysis of ITER scenarios and perspectives for integrated modelling

On tokamak plasma rotation without the neutral beam torque

Electron temperature barriers in the RFX-mod experiment

Non-Solenoidal Plasma Startup in

MHD Stabilization Analysis in Tokamak with Helical Field

GA A25351 PHYSICS ADVANCES IN THE ITER HYBRID SCENARIO IN DIII-D

ELM Suppression in DIII-D Hybrid Plasmas Using n=3 Resonant Magnetic Perturbations

ASSESSMENT AND MODELING OF INDUCTIVE AND NON-INDUCTIVE SCENARIOS FOR ITER

Correlation between the edge and the internal transport barriers in JT-60U

Rotation and Neoclassical Ripple Transport in ITER

Plasma Physics Performance. Rebecca Cottrill Vincent Paglioni

STATIONARY, HIGH BOOTSTRAP FRACTION PLASMAS IN DIII-D WITHOUT INDUCTIVE CURRENT CONTROL

Dimensionless Identity Experiments in JT-60U and JET

TH/P8-4 Second Ballooning Stability Effect on H-mode Pedestal Scalings

SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T-10 TOKAMAK PLASMAS

Integrated Heat Transport Simulation of High Ion Temperature Plasma of LHD

Studies of H Mode Plasmas Produced Directly by Pellet Injection in DIII D

The Advanced Tokamak: Goals, prospects and research opportunities

First plasma operation of Wendelstein 7-X

Mission Elements of the FNSP and FNSF

Non-inductive plasma startup and current profile modification in Pegasus spherical torus discharges

Transcription:

I-07 Advanced Tokamak Research in and JT-60SA A. Isayama for the JT-60 team 18th International Toki Conference (ITC18) December 9-12, 2008 Ceratopia Toki, Toki Gifu JAPAN

Contents Advanced tokamak development in Physics understanding in AT regime Physics assessment for JT-60SA Summary JT-60SA DEMO ITER

Advanced tokamak development in

This talk Sakamoto (Thu, AM) Advanced Tokamak research in In ITER & DEMO, simultaneous achievement of - High beta (β N ) - High confinement (H H98(y,2) ) - High non-inductive CD fraction f NI (=f BS +f CD ) with sufficient duration is required In AT research, - High β p H-mode (~ITER Hybrid) - Reversed shear (~ITER SS) have been developed β N 5 4 3 2 1 0 N T M ITER SS ITER Hybrid Positive shear JT-60SA R W M DEMO No-wall β limit: 3-4 l i Reversed shear 0 20 40 60 80 100 f BS AT target Standard Advanced Progress in ITER Physics Basis, Chap.1

β N H H98(y,2) >2.6 was sustained for 25s (~14τ R ) in high β p H-mode plasma β N =2.6, H H98(y,2) =1.0-1.1, f BS ~0.4: >~ ITER Hybrid performance Avoidance of NTM onset by p & q optimization: q=1.5, 2 surfaces far from steep p 0.9MA/1.55T, q 95 =3.2, H H ~1, n e /n GW ~0.49-0.55

Central heating is effective in keeping ITB E45436(2006) E48158(2008) 2008 w/o FST w/ FST ITER Hybrid FST 2006 Fast ion loss has been reduced by installing ferritic steel tile (FST) (2005) Power supply of 3 PERP-NBs for central heating was modified for 30s injection (2007) Peaked pressure can be kept with smaller P net

Physics understanding in AT regime - NTM suppression - RWM suppression Last shot of (2008/8/29)

NTM stabilization with ECCD in Neoclassical Tearing Modes (NTMs) - appear in a high β plasma with positive shear ITER Standard and Hybrid scenarios - set achievable beta at β N <β N ideal - sometimes cause disruption NTM control is important: m/n=3/2 and 2/1 NTM avoidance long-pulse high-beta exp. NTM stabilization: ECCD Previous results in with ECCD Stabilization with O1 & X2 ECCD Stabilization with real-time mirror steering Preemptive stabilization Simulation with TOPICS-IB code NTM research in 2007-8 Stabilization with modulated ECCD Modulation Frequency [khz] 8 6 4 2 0 Progress in modulation NTM stabilization Heat wave propagation 2002 2004 2006 2008 Year

Stabilization effect is significantly affected by the phase difference between db/dt and ECCD Modulated ECCD: phasing is required for O-point ECCD 0º 90º 180º 0º phase difference: stabilization effect 90º phase difference: no clear effect 180º phase difference: destabilization effect Phasing is important

Detailed phase scan showed that phase error should be smaller for effective stabilization ECCD efficiency: η EC Hegna, PoP 97 Perkins EPS 97 Giruzzi, NF 99 50% degradation O-point ECCD ~exp[-t/τ decay ] 300ms B ~ time Modified Rutherford equation dw/dt=f(w) η EC (W) g(w) τ decay : minimum at ~ 10º O-point ECCD τ decay ~4s for unmodulated ECCD modulated ECCD : > x2 more effective α c Similar to experiments

RWM study in Resistive Wall Modes (RWMs) - appear at β N > β N - terminate the plasma by disruption Rotation can stabilize RWM RMW control by V t control : Variety of NBI pattern Previous RWM study Identification of minimum V t for RWM stability V crit t ~0.3% of V A M. Takechi PRL (2007) C β = β N β N β N ideal-wall β N RWM research in 2007-8 Detailed study on RWM stability (dv t /dr, etc) Sustainment of β N > β N plasma

Two new instabilities have been observed just before RWM: EWM and RWM precursor Discharge duration was limited by a variety of MHD instabilities Two new instabilities at β N >β N (1) Energetic particle driven Wall Mode (EWM) directly induce RWM even at V t >V t crit (2) RWM Precursor strongly affects V t profile at q=2, and finally induces RWM Strategy for longer sustainment - Sustain enough V t & dv t /dr to avoid RWM - Reduce perpendicular NB to avoid EWM/RWM precursor G. Matsunaga, IAEA2008

High β N (> β N ) was sustained for ~5s (~3τ R ) β N ~3.0 (C β ~0.4) was sustained by keeping V t > V t crit Sustained duration: ~5s (~3τ R ) limited by increase of β N due to gradual j(r) penetration f NI >80% and f BS ~50% (ACCOME code calculation) Successful sustainment by RWM suppression β N ~5s (~3τ R ) High β N regime above β N has been extended

Physics assessment for JT-60SA

JT-60SA program JT-60SA (JT-60 Super Advanced) Combined program of - ITER Satellite Tokamak Program of JA and EU - Japanese National Program Mission of JT-60SA Early realization of fusion energy by - supporting exploitation of ITER - research toward DEMO Target area of JT-60SA plasma Wide range of operational regime - Break-even class plasmas at I p <~5.5 MA - High β N full-cd plasmas for 100 s Wide range of plasma equilibrium - High shape parameter: S~6 - Low aspect ratio: A~2.5 S=(I p /ab)q 95 A -1 {1+κ 2 (1+2δ 2 )} Better stability with higher A -1, κ, δ a measure of stability improvement β t (=Sβ N /q 95 ) increases with S

Main parameters in JT-60SA Active MHD stabilization tools - 110GHz ECRF for NTM - In-vessel coils for RWM Nominal Parameter Major radius R [m] Minor radius a [m] Plasma current I p [MA] Toroidal Field B t [T] Plasma Volume [m 3 ] Greenwald density [10 20 m -3 ] Shape Parameter S Flattop flux @li=0.85 [Wb] TF Ripple at R+a 2.97 1.18 5.5 Aspect ratio A 2.5 Elongation κ x Triangularity δ x 1.93 0.57 Safety factor q 95 ~3 2.25 ~140 1.24 6.1 ~8 0.85%

Profiles in full consistent calculations of CD for steady-state scenarios j (MA/m 2 ) T e, T i (kev), n e (10 19 m -3 ) 0.8 5 Total 0.6 4 q 0.4 BS 3 0.2 NB 2 0 0 0.2 EC 0.4 0.6 ρ 0.8 1 1 8 6 n e T i 4 T e 2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 ρ 0.8 1 q Example of Full-CD I p =2.3MA B t =1.76T q 95 =5.4 f GW =0.85 f BS =0.65 β N =4.1 H H =1.3 I BS =1.49MA I NB =0.821MA I EC =0.015MA P PNB =20MW P NNB =10MW P EC =1.5MW

Summary advanced tokamak research Long pulse high β p H-mode - High integrated performance plasma with β N =2.6, H H98(y,2) ~1.0, f BS =0.4 was sustained for 25s (~14τ R ) by NTM avoidance NTM control - Importance of phasing was demonstrated - Modulated ECCD is >x2 superior to unmodulated ECCD RWM control - 2 new instabilities at β N >β N : EWM & RWM precursor - β N >β N was sustained for 5s (~3τ R ) by RWM suppression JT-60SA advanced tokamak research Design activity & physics assessment - Wide range of operational regime and plasma equilibrium - Full CD capability confirmed by simulation