Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon

Similar documents
Measurement of the CR e+/e- ratio with ground-based instruments

Cosmic Ray Physics with the MINOS Detectors. Jeff de Jong Oxford Particle Seminar Feb 24, 2009

Hadronic Interaction Studies with ARGO-YBJ

Cosmic Ray Physics with the ARGO-YBJ experiment

Experimental review of high-energy e e + and p p spectra

DIETRICH MÜLLER University of Chicago SLAC SUMMER INSTITUTE 2011

Indirect Search for Dark Matter with AMS-02

A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works

The KASCADE-Grande Experiment

Antimatter and dark matter: lessons from ballooning.

Highlights from the ARGO-YBJ Experiment

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

Cosmic Ray Physics with ARGO-YBJ

Experimental results on the atmospheric muon charge ratio

Cosmic Ray Physics with ARGO-YBJ

Search for diffuse cosmic neutrino fluxes with the ANTARES detector

Cosmic Antimatter. Stéphane. Coutu The Pennsylvania State University. 3 rd. Astrophysics Arequipa,, Peru August 28-29, 29, 2008

Fluxes of Galactic Cosmic Rays

Geomagnetic cutoff simulations for low-energy cosmic rays

Air Shower Measurements from PeV to EeV

Mass Composition Study at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Measurement of a Cosmic-ray Electron Spectrum with VERITAS

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

THE AMS RICH COUNTER

ISAPP Gran Sasso June 28-July 9, Observations of Cosmic Rays

DARK MATTER SEARCHES WITH AMS-02 EXPERIMENT

The LHAASO-KM2A detector array and physical expectations. Reporter:Sha Wu Mentor: Huihai He and Songzhan Chen

The VERITAS Dark M atter and Astroparticle Programs. Benjamin Zitzer For The VERITAS Collaboration

Recent Results from the ANTARES experiment

Dark Matter Searches with AMS-02. AMS: Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Neutrinos from the Milky Way. 18th Symposium on Astroparticle Physics in the Netherlands Erwin Visser

HAWC and the cosmic ray quest

Introduction History of Cosmic Ray Studies: Origin, Propagation, Spectrum, Composition

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Aug 2015

Cosmic Ray panorama. Pamela.roma2.infn.it PAMELA (2012) Experimental challenges : e + /p ~ 10-3 e + /e - ~ 10-1

OVERVIEW OF THE RESULTS

A M A N DA Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array Status and Results

arxiv:astro-ph/ v3 29 Nov 2003

Lecture 14. Dark Matter. Part IV Indirect Detection Methods

The air-shower experiment KASCADE-Grande

PoS(ICRC2015)432. Simulation Study On High Energy Electron and Gamma-ray Detection With the Newly Upgraded Tibet ASgamma Experiment

Astroparticle Physics with IceCube

Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics. PAMELA MissioN 17 December 2010 Prepared by FatiH KAYA

AugerPrime. Primary cosmic ray identification for the next 10 years. Radomír Šmída.

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments. A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

PoS(IDM2010)013. Antiproton and Electron Measurements and Dark Matter Searches in Cosmic Rays. Piergiorgio Picozza.

New results from the AMS experiment on the International Space Station. Henning Gast RWTH Aachen

Monthly Proton Flux. Solar modulation with AMS. Veronica Bindi, AMS Collaboration

Study of the arrival directions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays detected by the Pierre Auger Observatory

From the Knee to the toes: The challenge of cosmic-ray composition

COSMIC RAY COMPOSITION.

Hadronic interactions of ultra-high energy cosmic rays

The Shadow of the Moon in IceCube

MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos

Cosmic Ray Physics with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Dark Matter Models. Stephen West. and. Fellow\Lecturer. RHUL and RAL

EVIDENCE OF INTERMEDIATE-SCALE ENERGY SPECTRUM ANISOTROPY IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE FROM TELESCOPE ARRAY

Status KASCADE-Grande. April 2007 Aspen workshop on cosmic ray physics Andreas Haungs 1

Precision measurements of nuclear CR energy spectra and composition with the AMS-02 experiment

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jun 2016

Measurement of the angular resolution of the ARGO-YBJ detector

Search for Antiparticles in Cosmic Rays in Space and the Earth s Atmosphere. Philip von Doetinchem I. Phys. Inst. B, RWTH Aachen University

Gamma-Ray Astronomy with a Wide Field of View detector operated at Extreme Altitude in the Southern Hemisphere.

Trento Summary: Antimatter & Dark Matter Search. Status Dark Matter Search

Publications of Francesco Arneodo: journal articles

Antimatter in Space. Mirko Boezio INFN Trieste, Italy. PPC Torino July 14 th 2010

Recent Results from the KASCADE-Grande Data Analysis

Study of Performance Improvement for Air Shower Array with Surface Water Cherenkov Detectors

Experimental Constraints to High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models using the Pierre Auger Observatory Part II

Ultra- high energy cosmic rays

High-energy neutrino detection with the ANTARES underwater erenkov telescope. Manuela Vecchi Supervisor: Prof. Antonio Capone

Experimental Constraints to high energy hadronic interaction models using the Pierre Auger Observatory part-i

SURFACE ARRAY Détecteur de surface pour ANTARES JP Ernenwein CPPM

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 29 Jun 2008

Search for high energy neutrino astrophysical sources with the ANTARES Cherenkov telescope

Status of ARGO-YBJ: an overview

Cherenkov Telescope Array Status Report. Salvatore Mangano (CIEMAT) On behalf of the CTA consortium

Exploring the Lifetime Frontier and Cosmic Ray Physics

The PAMELA Satellite Experiment: An Observatory in Space for Particles, Antiparticles and Nuclei in the Cosmic Rays

Blazars as the Astrophysical Counterparts of the IceCube Neutrinos

Lessons 19 and 20. Detection of C.R. with energy > TeV Study of the C.R. isotropy/anisotropy Ground based detectors:

Numerical study of the electron lateral distribution in atmospheric showers of high energy cosmic rays

HARP (Hadron Production) Experiment at CERN

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 10 Mar 2003

The H.E.S.S. Standard Analysis Technique

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Experimental studies of East-West effect of the charge ratio of atmospheric muons with energies relevant to the atmospheric neutrino anomaly

Geomagnetic cutoff calculations for the interpretation of low-rigidity cosmic-ray antiparticle measurements

Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry

Indirect Dark Matter Detection

Momentum spectra of atmospheric pions, muons, electrons and positrons at balloon altitudes

Errors of Atmospheric Neutrino Flux

Multi-messenger Astronomy. Elisa Resconi ECP (Experimental Physics with Cosmic Particles) TU München

Extreme high-energy variability of Markarian 421

Transcription:

Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon Presented by: Yupeng Xu ( ETH Zürich / L3+C collaboration) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003 The L3+C Experiment Motivation: Antiprotons in space The Earth-Moon system as a spectrometer The angular resolution p/p ratio: measurement and limits Summary and outlook 2nd part: Measurement of the atmospheric muon spectrum from 20 to 2000 GeV Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 1) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

The L3+C experiment Location: 6.02 E, 46.25 N, 450 m a.s.l. Muon Detector: 30 m underground (E µ > 15 GeV) Magnet (0.5 Tesla, 1000 m 3 ) High precision drift chambers T 0 detector (202 m 2 of scintillator) Geom. acceptance: Σ Ω 200 m 2 sr GPS timing: 1 µs Trigger and DAQ: independent of L3 Air shower detector: 50 scint.s at surface Muon data: 1999-2000 1.2 10 10 triggers, 12 TB data 2.6965 10 7 seconds (312 days) live-time Main Topics: Spectrum, point source and GRB, solar flares, composition, large area correlation, atmospheric effects, exotic events, p/p ratio Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 2) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Motivation: Antiprotons in space The study of antiprotons (and positrons) is extremely interesting because they provide important information concerning the origin and propagation of cosmic rays in the Galaxy. Theoretical models Secondary production: Most of the CR antiprotons observed near the Earth are secondaries produced in collisions of energetic CR particles with interstellar gas Exotic sources - Primordial black hole (PBH) evaporation - Dark matter neutralino annihilation - High energy antiprotons from extragalactic sources?? Experimental Measurement Direct measurement: Balloon or satellite (< 50 GeV/c) Indirect method: - Cosmic ray µ + /µ ratio (model dependent, difficult) - The Moon shadow technique. Antiproton/proton ratio 1 10-2 10-4 10-6 AMS 2002 CAPRICE2 2001 BESS 2000 HEAT-pbar 2001 MASS2 1999 CAPRICE 1997 IMAX 1996 Bogomolov 1990 LEAP 1990 PBAR 1990 Golden 1984 Buffington 1981 L3+C 10-1 1 10 10 2 10 3 Kinetic energy (GeV) (Adapted from Boezio, M., et al., 2001, ApJ, 561, 787) Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 3) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

The Earth-Moon system as a spectrometer Cosmic rays are blocked by the Moon. = deficit of cosmic rays when looking at the Moon (Clark 1957). Size of the deficit effective angular resolution Position of the deficit pointing error Geomagnetic field: positively charged particles deflected towards the East and negatively charged particles towards the West. = ion spectrometer (Urban et al. ARTEMIS experiment) Observation since 1990 s: EAS arrays: CYGNUS(only shadow), CASA(only shadow), TIBET(new data, not published) Imaging atmospheric Cherenkov technique(iact): ARTEMIS(failed), CLUE(?) Water Cherenkov detector: MILAGRO(no limit on p/p yet) Muon detectors: MACRO(sun shadow, HE!), SOUDAN(no limit), L3+C Earth W N E Moonshadow for protons Advantage of L3+C: B Moon Moonshadow for anti-protons Excellent angular resolution and pointing Precise momentum measurement Low p min (high rate, large deflection) Real sensitivity on the earth magnetic field. p p p Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 4) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Trajectory of the Moon as seen from L3+C Sky seen by L3+C in the local coordinate system Acceptance: θ z = 0 60 1 pixel = 1 direction Geomagnetic field model: IGRF θ = f(α z, θ z, p, Z). where the parameters are direction, momentum and charge number of the primary particles. The direction of deflections mainly depends on the Moon position the deflection coordinate system defined for each Moon position in the sky: - θ H and θ V respectively parallel and orthogonal to the computed deflection direction. Example for a given day (215 transits observed): sin(θ z ) cos(α z ) sin(θ z ) sin(α z ) Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 5) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Shadow simulation Shadow simulation in 3 different coordinate systems(local/celestial/deflection): 1 a) 1 b) 1 c) θ z (degrees) 0.5 0-0.5 δ (degrees) 0.5 0-0.5 θ V (degrees) 0.5 0-0.5-1 -1-0.5 0 0.5 1 α z (degrees) -1-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 RA (degrees) -1-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 θ H (degrees) Both the offset and elongation due to the magnetic field are more clearly visible in the deflection system. Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 6) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

The Angular resolution The effective angular resolution includes: Angle between muons and primary particles Multiple scattering in the molasse Detector s intrinsic angular resolution Simulation CORSIKA: air shower (confirmed by KASCADE) GEANT: multiple scattering and detector response Double-muon events nearly parallel at detector level the data is in good agreement with the simulation Single muon simulation = angular resolution for further analysis. surface µ scintillators molasse 3 m 11 m 3 m magnet driftchambers Run # 112977 Event #129301 Data Event DAQ Time : 711 45502 x y z 9 0 0. 0 0 0 mm (GeV) E µ 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 σ2µ (degrees) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 M.C. DATA Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 7) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Data selection Selection scheme: Only one single muon is reconstructed in each event The angle with the Moon direction is < 5 p µ > 50 GeV The zenith angle θ z < 60 The fake and real Moon (p µ > 100 GeV) Density (events.ω M -1) 650 a) 600 550 500 450 Density (events.ω M -1) 650 b) 600 550 500 450 A few quality cuts 7.35 10 5 events selected.(exposure 1557.5h, 1188.7h effective live time) The first step: 1-D deficit plot 2-D smoothed shadow image 400 0 1 2 3 4 5 θ (degrees) Smoothed Data: Orthogonal to deflection ( ) Parallel to deflection ( ) 400 0 1 2 3 4 5 θ (degrees) Orthogonal to deflection ( ) Parallel to deflection ( ) Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 8) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

The Maximum Likelihood Method Work on the deflection coordinate system and assume: A planar background; p, p and 4 He have same spectral index; 75% muons come from protons, 25% come from heliums. The description of the data: g(x, y) = u x x + u y y + u z }{{} background N miss 1 + r [0.75 f 1(x x 0, y y 0, σ) }{{} p deficit where r is the ratio of antiproton to matter, f 1 and f 2 are the shadow functions for proton and helium respectively: f(x, y) = f H (x) f V (y), +0.25 f 2 (x x 0, y y 0, σ) }{{} He deficit + r f 1 (x 0 x, y 0 y, σ) ], }{{} p deficit f H (x) = (1 c) L 1 (x, a 1, b 1 ) + c L 2 (x, a 2, b 2 ), +RMoon 2 f V (y) = R Moon πrmoon 2 RMoon 2 1 u2 σ (y u) 2 2π e 2σ 2 du, parameters x 0 and y 0 describe the position of the deficit. Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 9) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Determination of the effective angular resolution and the pointing precision In this step no p are supposed in the primary flux. Results obtained in the MLH fit to the matter deficit: p µ > 100 GeV 65 GeV < p µ < 100 GeV parameter value uncertainty expected value uncertainty expected N miss 577.±5. 705.±6. x 0 ( ) 0.33 0.08 0.26 0.51 0.12 0.48 y 0 ( ) 0.05 0.04 0. -0.11 0.08 0. σ( ) 0.21 +0.04 0.03 0.24±0.01 0.28 +0.07 0.05 0.38±0.02 Significance 8.6 8.2 5.7 6. Pointing error: 0.1 for the 2 selected energy ranges. Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 10) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Measurement of the p/p ratio The antiproton search Select p µ > 65 GeV N miss was supposed to be shared between protons, helium and antiprotons and was constrained to the expected value. The value of σ was also constrained to the simulated value. Results: The total significance of the deficit is 9.4 s.d.. ln L 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 p µ > 65 GeV/c -0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 r r = 0.04 0.08 +0.09, = r < 0.11 (90% C.L.) (unified approach method. G. Feldman 1998) = r p/p < 0.15 (90% C.L.) ( He p. = 0.25 0.75 ) Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 11) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Final result 1 antiproton/proton ratio 10-2 10-4 L3+C 2003 AMS 2002 CAPRICE2 2001 BESS 2000 HEAT-pbar 2001 MASS2 1999 CAPRICE 1997 IMAX 1996 Bogomolov 1990 LEAP 1990 PBAR 1990 Golden 1984 Buffington 1981 90% C.L. 10-6 10-1 1 10 10 2 10 3 Kinetic energy (GeV) Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 12) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Summary The moon shadow has been observed with 9.4 s.d. significance. The effective angular resolution for the set of selected events are measured to be 0.21 +0.04 0.03 for p µ > 100 GeV and 0.28 +0.07 0.05 65 < p µ < 100 GeV. The pointing precision is better than 0.1. for the momentum range No event deficit on the antimatter side is observed and the upper limit of the p content is 0.11 (90% C.L.). With the assumed flux composition and antiproton spectrum, this corresponds to a p/p ratio of r p/p = 0.15 (primaries around 700 GeV). The publication is practically ready. Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 13) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Outlook Taking into account all the accumulated data At the moment only 33% of the data has been used due to restrictions in the reconstruction program. A complete reconstruction of our data by a new program is currently in progress. New simulation scenario = Improved result in the near future. Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 14) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

2nd part: The muon spectrum Measurement of the atmospheric muon spectrum from 20 to 2000 GeV Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 15) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

The muon spectrum Atmospheric muons are among the final products of primary cosmic ray induced air shower cascades. A precise measurement of the ground level muon flux can be used to estimate the primary flux, the primary composition and to study the hadronic interactions involved in the production of the muons parent mesons. It provides a crucial input to the theoretical calculation of the atmospheric neutrino flux, because each muon is produced with an accompanying muon neutrino. This is needed to interpret the observed muon neutrino flux deficit at high energy and to evaluate the background for neutrino astronomy. Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 16) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

The muon spectrum L3+C measured the vertical muon flux 20-2000 GeV the charge ratio 20-600 GeV the zenith angle dependencies up to 58 Large exposure factor of about 180 m 2 sr d Maximum detectable momentum at 4.7 ± 0.4 TeV Minimum systematic error of vertical muon flux is 2.6% Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 17) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Vertical muon spectrum and charge ratio (cos(θ) > 0.975) Φ p 3 [GeV 2 cm -2 s -1 sr -1 ] 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 µ + /µ - 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 world average L3+C 0.15 AHM71 Kiel71 MARS75 0.1 AHM79 MASS93 CAPRICE94/97/98 0.05 L3+C 10 2 10 3 p [GeV] 0.6 15 100 800 Comparison is made with other experiment results providing obsolute flux values. (inner error bar: statistical error; full error bar: total error) 1.2 1 0.8 p [GeV] Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 18) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Zenith angle dependence charge ratio - 1 + µ /µ Φ p3 [GeV2cm-2s-1sr-1] muon spectrum 0.9 cos(θ) scale offset 0.975-1.000 +0.7 9 cos(θ) scale offset 0.975-1.000 +7 0.938-0.975 +6 0.900-0.938 +5 0.825-0.900 +4 0.750-0.825 +3 0.675-0.750 +2 0.600-0.675 +1 0.525-0.600 -- 8 0.8 7 0.7 0.938-0.975 +0.6 0.900-0.938 +0.5 6 0.6 0.5 0.825-0.900 +0.4 0.4 0.750-0.825 +0.3 0.3 0.675-0.750 +0.2 5 4 3 0.2 0.600-0.675 +0.1 0.525-0.600 -- 2 0.1 10 2 10 3 10 4 p [GeV] Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 19) 1 10 2 10 3 p [GeV] PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003

Comparison with TARGET 2.2 - a hadronic interaction modes (R. Engel et al., Proc. 28th ICRC, Tsukuba, Japan, (2003) 1603) Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon (Page 20) PhD Students Seminar, PSI, October 1-2, 2003